Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #14671 > unrolled thread

What determines the width of the virtual consoles?

Started bygazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack)
First post2015-04-28 23:56 +0000
Last post2015-04-29 13:00 -0500
Articles 6 on this page of 26 — 15 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc


Contents

  What determines the width of the virtual consoles? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-04-28 23:56 +0000
    Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-04-29 05:13 +0100
      Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2015-04-29 06:43 +0200
        Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-04-29 06:30 +0100
          Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2015-04-29 15:14 +0000
            Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-04-29 15:53 +0000
        Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-04-29 11:33 +0000
          Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2015-04-29 06:51 -0500
            Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-04-29 13:07 +0000
              Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2015-04-29 09:15 -0500
            Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2015-05-22 08:05 +0000
              Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? Lucas Levrel <lucas.levrel@u-pec.fr> - 2015-05-22 15:38 +0200
          Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? ruben safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com> - 2015-05-09 19:41 -0400
        Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? Andreas Kohlbach <apr15.7.ankman@spamgourmet.net> - 2015-04-29 18:09 -0400
          Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2015-04-30 01:02 +0200
            Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? Andreas Kohlbach <may15.7.ankman@spamgourmet.net> - 2015-05-02 16:28 -0400
              Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? Chris <cmilnec@spam.net> - 2015-05-04 03:40 +0000
                Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-05-04 11:23 +0000
                Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? Andreas Kohlbach <may15.7.ankman@spamgourmet.net> - 2015-05-05 16:45 -0400
                  Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2015-05-06 00:21 +0200
                    Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? Andreas Kohlbach <may15.7.ankman@spamgourmet.net> - 2015-05-06 17:07 -0400
              Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? Bill Marcum <bill.marcum57@gmail.com> - 2015-05-06 03:22 -0400
                Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? Chick Tower <c.tower@deadspam.com> - 2015-05-08 21:30 +0000
                  Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? Andreas Kohlbach <may15.7.ankman@spamgourmet.net> - 2015-05-09 16:28 -0400
    Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2015-04-29 06:56 -0500
      Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? "Rinaldi J. Montessi" <rinaldi@notaserver.com> - 2015-04-29 13:00 -0500

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]


#14720

FromAndreas Kohlbach <may15.7.ankman@spamgourmet.net>
Date2015-05-06 17:07 -0400
Message-ID<87bnhxxvnb.fsf@usenet.ankman.de>
In reply to#14713
Aragorn wrote on 05. May 2015:
>
> On Tuesday 05 May 2015 22:45, Andreas Kohlbach conveyed the following to 
> comp.os.linux.misc...
>
>> I tried that and I also get the low-resolution text. But then X won't
>> come up. Getting
>> 
>> | [KMS] drm report modesetting isn't supported.
>> 
>> in the Xorg log.
>> 
>> I set "modeset=1" again. And will investigate this weekend if there
>> isn't a way to have both.
>
> If you want high resolution graphics in X without using a modesetting 
> driver, then you must blacklist the modesetting driver ─ in your case, 
> that's "radeon" ─ and use the proprietary driver for X ─ in your case, 
> fglrx.

I used fglrx before, which caused other problems, so I went back to the
open source radeon.

Seems I won't have low-res on TTYs then...
-- 
Andreas

I use a Unix based operating system, which means I get laid almost as often as I
have to reboot my computer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#14716

FromBill Marcum <bill.marcum57@gmail.com>
Date2015-05-06 03:22 -0400
Message-ID<micfgi$8e6$1@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#14690
On 05/02/2015 04:28 PM, Andreas Kohlbach wrote:
> Aragorn wrote on 29. April 2015:
>> Have you tried setting "vga=0" in your grub.cfg?
>
> Thanks.
>
> I tried both, "nokmsboot" and "vga=0" at the boot prompt. None produces
> the result I hoped for. Not even when I pass both to the kernel at the
> same boot.
>
You might try "vga=ask". That should give you a list of choices and then
if you find one you like, change it to "vga=n".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#14743

FromChick Tower <c.tower@deadspam.com>
Date2015-05-08 21:30 +0000
Message-ID<mij9t2$74q$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#14716
On 2015-05-06, Bill Marcum wrote:
> You might try "vga=ask". That should give you a list of choices and then
> if you find one you like, change it to "vga=n".

Where "n" is a number, such as 769, I assume?  That number, as well as
"vga=normal", should give the OP what he wants, although it sounds like
it isn't doing so in his postings.
-- 
                                 Chick Tower

For e-mail:  colm DOT sent DOT towerboy AT xoxy DOT net

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#14747

FromAndreas Kohlbach <may15.7.ankman@spamgourmet.net>
Date2015-05-09 16:28 -0400
Message-ID<87twvlqyvd.fsf@usenet.ankman.de>
In reply to#14743
Chick Tower wrote on 08. May 2015:
>
> On 2015-05-06, Bill Marcum wrote:
>> You might try "vga=ask". That should give you a list of choices and then
>> if you find one you like, change it to "vga=n".
>
> Where "n" is a number, such as 769, I assume?

Yeah, VGA modes. I found this table.

| Depth  800x600 1024x768 1152x864 1280x1024 1600x1200
| 8 bit  vga=771 vga=773  vga=353   vga=775   vga=796
| 16 bit vga=788 vga=791  vga=355   vga=794   vga=798
| 24 bit vga=789 vga=792            vga=795   vga=799

> That number, as well as "vga=normal", should give the OP what he wants,
> although it sounds like it isn't doing so in his postings.

The "vga=" is obsolete, replaced by "gfxpayload".

At least here it has no effect. Also I wanted text-mode 640x480 pixels
with 80x25 characters, not framebuffer.
-- 
Andreas

I use a Unix based operating system, which means I get laid almost as often as I
have to reboot my computer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#14678

Fromphilo <philo@privacy.net>
Date2015-04-29 06:56 -0500
Message-ID<mhqgr7$nbu$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#14671
On 04/28/2015 06:56 PM, Kenny McCormack wrote:
> What I mean is: The number displayed as the number of columns when I do
> "stty -a", like this: stty -a -F /dev/tty1
>
> I have two systems, running the same OS on the same hardware.  One one
> machine, when I do: sudo stty -a -F /dev/tty1, it says "164 columns".
> On the other one, when I do the same command, it says "222 columns".
>
> Note that on both machines (and, as far as I know, on any Linux system),
> you get the same result for any of the virtual consoles (/dev/tty1,
> /dev/tty2, etc).  But you seem to get different results on different
> systems.
>
> What determines this?
>


https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ConsoleFramebuffer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#14684

From"Rinaldi J. Montessi" <rinaldi@notaserver.com>
Date2015-04-29 13:00 -0500
Message-ID<55411C2C.7070702@notaserver.com>
In reply to#14678
Zaphod Beeblebrox decreed, Read These Runes!:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 06:56:20 -0500, philo wrote:
> 
>> On 04/28/2015 06:56 PM, Kenny McCormack wrote:
>>> What I mean is: The number displayed as the number of columns when I do
>>> "stty -a", like this: stty -a -F /dev/tty1
>>>
>>> I have two systems, running the same OS on the same hardware.  One one
>>> machine, when I do: sudo stty -a -F /dev/tty1, it says "164 columns".
>>> On the other one, when I do the same command, it says "222 columns".
>>>
>>> Note that on both machines (and, as far as I know, on any Linux
>>> system),
>>> you get the same result for any of the virtual consoles (/dev/tty1,
>>> /dev/tty2, etc).  But you seem to get different results on different
>>> systems.  What determines this?
>> 
>> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ConsoleFramebuffer
> 
> Good partial answer. My HDMI 1920x1080 monitor isn't listed, I wonder
> what resolution it's using. It says "rows 67 columns 240". The one
> piece that seems to be missing here is the choice of font for the tty.

I can offer a solution that works well here:

fbset -a -xres 1920 -yres 1080 #in rc.local
setfont -v iso02-12x22.psfu.gz #in rc.font

Season to taste for your distro's init..

-- 
"An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of purge."

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc


csiph-web