Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #14671 > unrolled thread
| Started by | gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-04-28 23:56 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-04-29 13:00 -0500 |
| Articles | 6 on this page of 26 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc
What determines the width of the virtual consoles? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-04-28 23:56 +0000
Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-04-29 05:13 +0100
Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2015-04-29 06:43 +0200
Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-04-29 06:30 +0100
Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2015-04-29 15:14 +0000
Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-04-29 15:53 +0000
Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-04-29 11:33 +0000
Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2015-04-29 06:51 -0500
Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-04-29 13:07 +0000
Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2015-04-29 09:15 -0500
Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2015-05-22 08:05 +0000
Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? Lucas Levrel <lucas.levrel@u-pec.fr> - 2015-05-22 15:38 +0200
Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? ruben safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com> - 2015-05-09 19:41 -0400
Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? Andreas Kohlbach <apr15.7.ankman@spamgourmet.net> - 2015-04-29 18:09 -0400
Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2015-04-30 01:02 +0200
Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? Andreas Kohlbach <may15.7.ankman@spamgourmet.net> - 2015-05-02 16:28 -0400
Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? Chris <cmilnec@spam.net> - 2015-05-04 03:40 +0000
Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-05-04 11:23 +0000
Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? Andreas Kohlbach <may15.7.ankman@spamgourmet.net> - 2015-05-05 16:45 -0400
Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2015-05-06 00:21 +0200
Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? Andreas Kohlbach <may15.7.ankman@spamgourmet.net> - 2015-05-06 17:07 -0400
Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? Bill Marcum <bill.marcum57@gmail.com> - 2015-05-06 03:22 -0400
Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? Chick Tower <c.tower@deadspam.com> - 2015-05-08 21:30 +0000
Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? Andreas Kohlbach <may15.7.ankman@spamgourmet.net> - 2015-05-09 16:28 -0400
Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2015-04-29 06:56 -0500
Re: What determines the width of the virtual consoles? "Rinaldi J. Montessi" <rinaldi@notaserver.com> - 2015-04-29 13:00 -0500
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | Andreas Kohlbach <may15.7.ankman@spamgourmet.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-05-06 17:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <87bnhxxvnb.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> |
| In reply to | #14713 |
Aragorn wrote on 05. May 2015: > > On Tuesday 05 May 2015 22:45, Andreas Kohlbach conveyed the following to > comp.os.linux.misc... > >> I tried that and I also get the low-resolution text. But then X won't >> come up. Getting >> >> | [KMS] drm report modesetting isn't supported. >> >> in the Xorg log. >> >> I set "modeset=1" again. And will investigate this weekend if there >> isn't a way to have both. > > If you want high resolution graphics in X without using a modesetting > driver, then you must blacklist the modesetting driver ─ in your case, > that's "radeon" ─ and use the proprietary driver for X ─ in your case, > fglrx. I used fglrx before, which caused other problems, so I went back to the open source radeon. Seems I won't have low-res on TTYs then... -- Andreas I use a Unix based operating system, which means I get laid almost as often as I have to reboot my computer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bill Marcum <bill.marcum57@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-05-06 03:22 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <micfgi$8e6$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #14690 |
On 05/02/2015 04:28 PM, Andreas Kohlbach wrote: > Aragorn wrote on 29. April 2015: >> Have you tried setting "vga=0" in your grub.cfg? > > Thanks. > > I tried both, "nokmsboot" and "vga=0" at the boot prompt. None produces > the result I hoped for. Not even when I pass both to the kernel at the > same boot. > You might try "vga=ask". That should give you a list of choices and then if you find one you like, change it to "vga=n".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chick Tower <c.tower@deadspam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-05-08 21:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mij9t2$74q$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #14716 |
On 2015-05-06, Bill Marcum wrote:
> You might try "vga=ask". That should give you a list of choices and then
> if you find one you like, change it to "vga=n".
Where "n" is a number, such as 769, I assume? That number, as well as
"vga=normal", should give the OP what he wants, although it sounds like
it isn't doing so in his postings.
--
Chick Tower
For e-mail: colm DOT sent DOT towerboy AT xoxy DOT net
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andreas Kohlbach <may15.7.ankman@spamgourmet.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-05-09 16:28 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <87twvlqyvd.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> |
| In reply to | #14743 |
Chick Tower wrote on 08. May 2015: > > On 2015-05-06, Bill Marcum wrote: >> You might try "vga=ask". That should give you a list of choices and then >> if you find one you like, change it to "vga=n". > > Where "n" is a number, such as 769, I assume? Yeah, VGA modes. I found this table. | Depth 800x600 1024x768 1152x864 1280x1024 1600x1200 | 8 bit vga=771 vga=773 vga=353 vga=775 vga=796 | 16 bit vga=788 vga=791 vga=355 vga=794 vga=798 | 24 bit vga=789 vga=792 vga=795 vga=799 > That number, as well as "vga=normal", should give the OP what he wants, > although it sounds like it isn't doing so in his postings. The "vga=" is obsolete, replaced by "gfxpayload". At least here it has no effect. Also I wanted text-mode 640x480 pixels with 80x25 characters, not framebuffer. -- Andreas I use a Unix based operating system, which means I get laid almost as often as I have to reboot my computer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | philo <philo@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-29 06:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mhqgr7$nbu$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #14671 |
On 04/28/2015 06:56 PM, Kenny McCormack wrote: > What I mean is: The number displayed as the number of columns when I do > "stty -a", like this: stty -a -F /dev/tty1 > > I have two systems, running the same OS on the same hardware. One one > machine, when I do: sudo stty -a -F /dev/tty1, it says "164 columns". > On the other one, when I do the same command, it says "222 columns". > > Note that on both machines (and, as far as I know, on any Linux system), > you get the same result for any of the virtual consoles (/dev/tty1, > /dev/tty2, etc). But you seem to get different results on different > systems. > > What determines this? > https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ConsoleFramebuffer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rinaldi J. Montessi" <rinaldi@notaserver.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-29 13:00 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <55411C2C.7070702@notaserver.com> |
| In reply to | #14678 |
Zaphod Beeblebrox decreed, Read These Runes!: > On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 06:56:20 -0500, philo wrote: > >> On 04/28/2015 06:56 PM, Kenny McCormack wrote: >>> What I mean is: The number displayed as the number of columns when I do >>> "stty -a", like this: stty -a -F /dev/tty1 >>> >>> I have two systems, running the same OS on the same hardware. One one >>> machine, when I do: sudo stty -a -F /dev/tty1, it says "164 columns". >>> On the other one, when I do the same command, it says "222 columns". >>> >>> Note that on both machines (and, as far as I know, on any Linux >>> system), >>> you get the same result for any of the virtual consoles (/dev/tty1, >>> /dev/tty2, etc). But you seem to get different results on different >>> systems. What determines this? >> >> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ConsoleFramebuffer > > Good partial answer. My HDMI 1920x1080 monitor isn't listed, I wonder > what resolution it's using. It says "rows 67 columns 240". The one > piece that seems to be missing here is the choice of font for the tty. I can offer a solution that works well here: fbset -a -xres 1920 -yres 1080 #in rc.local setfont -v iso02-12x22.psfu.gz #in rc.font Season to taste for your distro's init.. -- "An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of purge."
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web