Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #90034 > unrolled thread
| Started by | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2026-08-18 01:44 -0400 |
| Last post | 2026-08-19 22:21 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 206 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc
What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-18 01:44 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-18 01:59 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-18 06:05 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2026-08-18 08:10 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-08-18 11:33 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-18 22:16 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-19 03:32 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-19 14:05 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-19 13:23 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-19 14:10 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-19 15:15 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-19 21:53 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-08-19 22:54 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Anton Antimo <anton@safunu.org> - 2026-08-20 10:31 -0300
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-21 13:10 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Anton Antimo <anton@safunu.org> - 2026-08-20 10:30 -0300
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-08-20 18:04 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-19 14:01 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-19 15:24 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-19 22:07 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-22 04:02 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-22 06:48 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-22 16:15 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2026-08-23 21:52 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-24 01:07 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-24 11:15 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-24 19:26 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-25 11:45 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-25 18:39 +0000
Power lines Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-08-25 06:48 -0700
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-25 15:10 +0100
Re: Power lines Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-08-26 18:04 -0700
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 03:23 -0400
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-27 12:09 +0100
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 22:15 -0400
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-28 03:21 +0000
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-28 02:42 -0400
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 13:15 +0100
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-28 18:40 +0000
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 10:37 +0100
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-29 20:13 +0000
Re: Power lines "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2026-08-29 21:28 +0100
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 23:23 +0100
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-29 22:47 +0000
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 23:20 +0100
Re: Power lines "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-30 13:43 +0200
Re: Power lines Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-08-30 15:49 +0000
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-30 18:40 +0000
Re: Power lines "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-30 21:23 +0200
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-30 19:36 +0000
Re: Power lines Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-08-31 15:50 +0000
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-01 02:55 -0400
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 07:41 +0000
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-01 03:49 -0400
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 13:17 +0100
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 18:24 +0000
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-02 01:33 -0400
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-02 11:43 +0100
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 13:15 +0100
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-02 01:32 -0400
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 13:12 +0100
Re: Power lines Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-01 18:14 +0000
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 19:22 +0100
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 21:06 +0000
Re: Power lines Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-01 23:40 +0000
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-02 11:32 +0100
Re: Power lines Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-01 23:40 +0000
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-02 01:28 -0400
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-02 11:41 +0100
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 13:04 +0100
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 13:09 +0100
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 13:06 +0100
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-27 14:19 +0000
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-27 15:25 +0100
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 22:24 -0400
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 13:18 +0100
Re: Power lines Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-08-28 05:56 -0700
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 15:33 +0100
Re: Power lines Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2026-08-28 16:06 +0000
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 10:30 +0100
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-28 18:51 +0000
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 10:39 +0100
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-29 20:26 +0000
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 23:25 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-25 01:46 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-25 11:50 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-25 18:43 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-26 04:07 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Enoch Powell <e.powell@tutanatu.kom> - 2026-08-27 10:54 -0600
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-27 19:11 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Enoch Powell <e.powell@tutanatu.kom> - 2026-08-27 12:57 -0600
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 12:55 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-28 18:25 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 00:27 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-28 00:45 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 13:02 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2026-08-28 16:13 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 10:32 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-29 19:38 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 22:57 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-30 06:10 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 22:55 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-25 23:34 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2026-08-26 04:27 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-26 08:57 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-08-27 06:30 -0700
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-27 13:57 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 22:22 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 13:16 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-28 18:36 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-08-28 19:42 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 10:28 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-29 20:04 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 23:18 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-29 22:50 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-30 18:03 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-30 18:35 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-31 00:43 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-31 02:21 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-31 12:33 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-31 09:22 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-31 13:01 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-31 03:00 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-31 12:47 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-31 18:36 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-01 02:09 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 07:11 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-01 03:47 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 13:56 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 18:00 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 19:11 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-01 18:17 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-01 18:19 +0000
[OT] Finland, and Russia (was: Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ?) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 23:49 +0100
Re: [OT] Finland, and Russia (was: Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-02 02:53 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-02 02:46 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 13:54 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 18:17 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 19:23 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-01 21:23 +0200
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 21:18 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-02 02:00 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-02 11:44 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 13:43 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 18:12 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Stanislav N. aka pztrn" <pztrn@oldproto.invalid> - 2026-08-30 07:55 +0500
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-30 02:08 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-30 06:30 +0000
[OT] Russian Federation, wars (was: Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ?) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-30 10:04 +0100
Re: [OT] Russian Federation, wars Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-08-30 10:22 +0100
Re: [OT] Russian Federation, wars "Stanislav N. aka pztrn" <pztrn@oldproto.invalid> - 2026-08-30 16:13 +0500
Re: [OT] Russian Federation, wars The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-30 18:12 +0100
Re: [OT] Russian Federation, wars "Stanislav N. aka pztrn" <pztrn@oldproto.invalid> - 2026-08-30 16:47 +0500
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-29 13:58 +0200
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-08-29 10:11 -0700
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-29 22:20 +0200
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-29 23:06 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-30 02:14 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-30 06:35 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-30 19:28 +0200
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-31 02:15 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 22:55 +0100
Salmonella (Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-08-30 09:28 -0700
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-30 19:27 +0200
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-30 18:31 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-30 21:30 +0200
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-30 19:43 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-30 21:57 +0200
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-31 02:35 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-31 02:50 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-31 18:29 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-31 01:52 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-31 12:47 +0200
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-31 12:37 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-08-31 15:50 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-31 18:41 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-01 02:37 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-09-01 06:26 -0700
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 19:05 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 21:07 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 18:19 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Enoch Powell <e.powell@tutanatu.kom> - 2026-08-31 17:07 -0600
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-01 01:20 -0400
[OT] Personal safety in the USA (was: Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ?) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 10:27 +0100
[OT] Personal safety in the USA (was: Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ?) John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-09-01 08:23 -0700
Re: [OT] Personal safety in the USA Enoch Powell <e.powell@tutanatu.kom> - 2026-09-01 10:24 -0600
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 13:04 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Enoch Powell <e.powell@tutanatu.kom> - 2026-09-01 11:00 -0600
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-02 01:23 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-02 11:35 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 22:49 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-08-27 16:32 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 22:44 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-19 12:57 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-19 14:03 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-19 22:24 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-18 22:07 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-19 03:42 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-19 02:14 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-19 14:13 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-19 14:14 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-19 15:27 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-08-19 16:57 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-19 14:02 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-19 13:54 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-19 22:21 -0400
Page 10 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 Next page →
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-01 18:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nfoj8jFtomiU20@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #91012 |
On Tue, 1 Sep 2026 06:26:13 -0700, Lars Poulsen wrote: > On 2026-08-31 11:41, rbowman wrote: >> On Mon, 31 Aug 2026 15:50:44 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >> >>> On 2026-08-31, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> In the US, yes. Its cheaper to keep chickens in such density so they >>>> are trampled by each other pecked by each other and covered with >>>> their own piss and shit,m and then chlorinate them afterwards. >>> >>> Sounds like typical urban planning. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_sink >> >> The planners used Calhoun's rat utopia design without reading the rest >> of the study. > > It is noteworthy that other groups replicating Calhoun's experiment have > failed to get the same results. The Science!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Enoch Powell <e.powell@tutanatu.kom> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-31 17:07 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <11751fg$1birh$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #90965 |
On 8/31/2026 9:50 AM, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > On 2026-08-31, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> In the US, yes. Its cheaper to keep chickens in such density so they are >> trampled by each other pecked by each other and covered with their own >> piss and shit,m and then chlorinate them afterwards. > > Sounds like typical urban planning. > This article sort of touches on the subject: First 9 Most Dangerous Cities In The US (The Consequences Of Being In These Places Can be Devastating, If You Don’t Know What to Expect!) This article was created for educational purposes and I suggest you take these tips and information with a good heart because it can help you prevent an unpleasant situation! It’s difficult to believe that a little over 100 years ago not only did people rarely if ever lock their doors in the United States many houses didn’t even have locks on the doors. In today’s world, filled with atrocious headlines and daily murders, that thought is as strange a concept as not having to pay federal taxes. Especially with regard to the large cities that dot the country side of America. The brutal crime rate and their remarkable progress in the 20th century are unparalleled around the world. The Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave has also given liberty to many destructive activities. These atrocities encompass every severe offense you can think of, from murder and attempted murder to reckless property crimes such as breaking and entering. Are there neighborhoods in the U.S. that are too dangerous to visit? I’ve driven through all of the 50 most dangerous neighborhoods in America, one of my many unusual travel goals, and very few were uncomfortably unsafe just driving through. I wouldn’t get out of the car and walk around though. To answer the question, there are probably nine neighborhoods of the 70,000 across America that I personally wouldn’t recommend anyone visiting, even merely driving through, unless you’re a local or have family there. Continue reading at link below: https://www.theburningplatform.com/2026/08/24/first-9-most-dangerous-cities-in-the-us-the-consequences-of-being-in-these-places-can-be-devastating-if-you-dont-know-what-to-expect/ -- Israel’s Ben Gvir Calls For Nightly Kill Quota In Gaza Ben Gvir: “There are people there who are not alive. They don’t need to live. They are not people. I’m doing them a favor by calling them people.” https://x.com/RyanRozbiani/status/2088695627702002109 https://www.globalgulag.us
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-01 01:20 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <KomcnSutk4pZ_Qv3nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #90982 |
On 8/31/26 19:07, Enoch Powell wrote: > On 8/31/2026 9:50 AM, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >> On 2026-08-31, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> >>> In the US, yes. Its cheaper to keep chickens in such density so they are >>> trampled by each other pecked by each other and covered with their own >>> piss and shit,m and then chlorinate them afterwards. >> >> Sounds like typical urban planning. >> > > This article sort of touches on the subject: Oh ... CHICKENS ... about a minus-one IQ. > First 9 Most Dangerous Cities In The US (The Consequences Of Being In > These Places Can be Devastating, If You Don’t Know What to Expect!) > > This article was created for educational purposes and I suggest you take > these tips and information with a good heart because it can help you > prevent an unpleasant situation! Almost NOBODY, NO place, is really set up for a Major Disaster. Being so would be TOO expensive. You could spend an entire national GDP on trying to set THAT up. TOO many ways things can go to crap. So, sorry, sometimes you're just gonna be On Your Own for awhile, maybe a LONG while. Prepared ??? Plan ??? What DO you do ???
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-01 10:27 +0100 |
| Subject | [OT] Personal safety in the USA (was: Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ?) |
| Message-ID | <11765pk$1leom$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #90982 |
On 2026-09-01, Enoch Powell wrote: > Are there neighborhoods in the U.S. that are too dangerous to visit? Besides places where the local law enforcement authorities were already more of high school bullies, I guess that now has to include any place to which ICE has been deployed. When you can be killed by a law enforcement officer "restraining" you way beyond proportional or legal response, or beaten or shot to death merely by existing around high school bullies with ICE badges, you can't really say that's a place that's not dangerous. I'd not be surprised if deaths and violence caused by ICE ended up surpassing non-ICE crimes in a lot of places. -- Nuno Silva
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-01 08:23 -0700 |
| Subject | [OT] Personal safety in the USA (was: Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ?) |
| Message-ID | <20260901082357.00003753@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #90982 |
On Mon, 31 Aug 2026 17:07:28 -0600 Enoch Powell <e.powell@tutanatu.kom> wrote: > This article sort of touches on the subject: > > First 9 Most Dangerous Cities In The US (The Consequences Of Being In > These Places Can be Devastating, If You Don’t Know What to Expect!) The clickbait headline and cartoon melodrama of the prose tell you a lot about the author's intent here, I think. Urban blight may be real enough, but in my experience most people's takes on it say more about their preconceptions of a neighborhood than the place itself. Still remember going to see Dragonforce in a south Minneapolis club ca. 2022 and having relatives absolutely *insist* on picking us up afterward because they were dead convinced it was a "war zone" after the 2020 protests. What'd we run into on the mean streets? Just a buncha totally ordinary city folk hustling from one corner to the next. People here in CA talk about Oakland the same way; I've been through there and gotten nothing but funny looks.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Enoch Powell <e.powell@tutanatu.kom> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-01 10:24 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] Personal safety in the USA |
| Message-ID | <1176u8j$20284$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #91013 |
On 9/1/2026 9:23 AM, John Ames wrote: > On Mon, 31 Aug 2026 17:07:28 -0600 > Enoch Powell <e.powell@tutanatu.kom> wrote: > >> This article sort of touches on the subject: >> >> First 9 Most Dangerous Cities In The US (The Consequences Of Being In >> These Places Can be Devastating, If You Don’t Know What to Expect!) https://www.theburningplatform.com/2026/08/24/first-9-most-dangerous-cities-in-the-us-the-consequences-of-being-in-these-places-can-be-devastating-if-you-dont-know-what-to-expect/ > > The clickbait headline and cartoon melodrama of the prose tell you a > lot about the author's intent here, Oh, I don't know. The author stated that if you stay on the main boulevards you can go into the areas he mentioned, but that side streets with no street signs where GPS is spotty could make you a target for property crime, carjacking, or worse. It seems like good advice to me, especially if you were, say, a German tourist family in Florida visiting America with your wife and kids who were targeted by "youths", never cautioned by the "woke" car rental company to avoid certain areas known to be high crime danger zones. I lived in Washington, DC, and remember parts of DC where you lock your car doors and don't stop at stop signs or red lights if you want to avoid being a victim of crime. Situational awareness is a good survival instinct in lots of places. That Ukrainian woman who was killed by a Black man on an Charlotte, NC light rail train while other passengers "minded their own business" would be alive today had she been more fearful of the homeless dude that slit her throat. Just saying. https://globalnews.ca/news/11404303/ukrainian-woman-iryna-zarutska-stabbed-attack-train-decarlos-brown-jr/ According to an affidavit viewed by ABC News, Iryna Zarutska boarded the train and sat in an aisle seat directly in front of the suspect, Decarlos Brown Jr., 34, who can be seen in a window seat wearing an orange sweatshirt. The train travels for “approximately four and a half minutes before the suspect pulls a knife out of his pocket, unfolds the knife, pauses, then stands up, and strikes at the victim three times,” according to the outlet. Before the stabbing, there appeared to be “no interaction between the victim and defendant,” the affidavit said. Zarutska was pronounced dead at the scene, and witnesses directed officials to the location of the suspect. I think. Urban blight may be real > enough, but in my experience most people's takes on it say more about > their preconceptions of a neighborhood than the place itself. Still > remember going to see Dragonforce in a south Minneapolis club ca. 2022 > and having relatives absolutely *insist* on picking us up afterward > because they were dead convinced it was a "war zone" after the 2020 > protests. What'd we run into on the mean streets? Just a buncha totally > ordinary city folk hustling from one corner to the next. People here in > CA talk about Oakland the same way; I've been through there and gotten > nothing but funny looks. Others may not be so lucky. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_on_Reginald_Denny Reginald Oliver Denny (born 1953) is a former construction truck driver who was pulled from his truck and severely beaten during the 1992 Los Angeles riots. His attackers, a group of black men who came to be known as the "L.A. Four", targeted Denny because he was white. The attack was captured on video by a news helicopter and broadcast live on U.S. national television. Four other black L.A. residents who had witnessed the attack on live television came to Denny's aid, placing him back in his truck and driving him to the hospital. Denny suffered a fractured skull and impairment of his speech and ability to walk, for which he underwent years of rehabilitative therapy. After unsuccessfully suing the City of Los Angeles, Denny moved to Arizona, where he worked as an independent boat mechanic and has mostly avoided media contact. -- Israel’s Ben Gvir Calls For Nightly Kill Quota In Gaza Ben Gvir: “There are people there who are not alive. They don’t need to live. They are not people. I’m doing them a favor by calling them people.” https://x.com/RyanRozbiani/status/2088695627702002109 https://www.globalgulag.us
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-01 13:04 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1176evk$1o1ba$16@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #90965 |
On 31/08/2026 16:50, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > On 2026-08-31, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> In the US, yes. Its cheaper to keep chickens in such density so they are >> trampled by each other pecked by each other and covered with their own >> piss and shit,m and then chlorinate them afterwards. > > Sounds like typical urban planning. > The 'projects', for fowl... -- "If you don’t read the news paper, you are un-informed. If you read the news paper, you are mis-informed." Mark Twain
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Enoch Powell <e.powell@tutanatu.kom> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-01 11:00 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <11770c2$20ohf$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #91004 |
On 9/1/2026 6:04 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 31/08/2026 16:50, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >> On 2026-08-31, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> >>> In the US, yes. Its cheaper to keep chickens in such density so they are >>> trampled by each other pecked by each other and covered with their own >>> piss and shit,m and then chlorinate them afterwards. >> >> Sounds like typical urban planning. >> > The 'projects', for fowl... > Aushwitz Farms. -- Israel’s Ben Gvir Calls For Nightly Kill Quota In Gaza Ben Gvir: “There are people there who are not alive. They don’t need to live. They are not people. I’m doing them a favor by calling them people.” https://x.com/RyanRozbiani/status/2088695627702002109 https://www.globalgulag.us
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-02 01:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <9i-dnRZXrsZ2Lwr3nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #91004 |
On 9/1/26 08:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 31/08/2026 16:50, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >> On 2026-08-31, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> >>> In the US, yes. Its cheaper to keep chickens in such density so they are >>> trampled by each other pecked by each other and covered with their own >>> piss and shit,m and then chlorinate them afterwards. >> >> Sounds like typical urban planning. >> > The 'projects', for fowl... Heh heh ! Anyway, chickens, minus-1 IQs. Not gonna worry TOO much about them, except which sauce makes 'em taste best.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-02 11:35 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1178u5n$2mjch$8@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #91053 |
On 02/09/2026 06:23, c186282 wrote: > Anyway, chickens, minus-1 IQs. Not gonna > worry TOO much about them, except which > sauce makes 'em taste best. > If they scratch around in the dirt eating worms, they don't NEED any sauce... -- The theory of Communism may be summed up in one sentence: Abolish all private property. Karl Marx
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-29 22:49 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <116vk4f$3j6fu$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #90820 |
On 29/08/2026 12:58, Carlos E. R. wrote: > On 2026-08-28 14:16, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 28/08/2026 03:22, c186282 wrote: >>> Salmonella in frozen blueberries. Eh ? >> >> Eggs reared under EU rather than UK rules >> > > What's the difference? > Relaxed standards for Eastern European countries. -- When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it. Frédéric Bastiat
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-27 16:32 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <nfb3gqF7jarU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #90487 |
c186282 wrote: > GoogleEarth showed large quantities of "blue tarp" roofs there for > YEARS 🙂 > > BUT, Laura Bush DID show up to distribute water bottles and MREs ! I though that was Waffle House's job?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-27 22:44 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <wxednY4-Uqqhaw33nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #90687 |
On 8/27/26 11:32, Andy Burns wrote: > > c186282 wrote: > >> GoogleEarth showed large quantities of "blue tarp" roofs there for >> YEARS 🙂 >> >> BUT, Laura Bush DID show up to distribute water bottles and MREs ! > > I though that was Waffle House's job? As I remember, the nearest WH had been trashed. BAD storms ! By popular convention, no WH = no civilization.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-19 12:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <116498l$2l1f7$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #90085 |
c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote: > On 8/18/26 04:10, vallor wrote: >> At 18 Aug 2026 06:05:55 GMT, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 18 Aug 2026 01:44:51 -0400, c186282 wrote: >>> >>>> Tried FFox and Chromium the past few days. The site is ULTRA-slow, >>>> useless. >>> >>> Brave browser. Went to the site, paged through the instructions, went to >>> the Cinnamon download, selected the Clarkson mirror, and the download >>> started immediately. Canceled the download. >>> >>> Like I've said before you have a lot more problems than the average bear. >> >> Well, his clock is off -- probably not enough to effect TLS, but >> figuring that out is above my current paygrade. >> >> Dear Mr. c-cipher, >> >> Please run: >> >> $ ntpdate -q time.nist.gov >> >> And post what you see. Mine says: >> >> 2026-08-18 01:06:57.105142 (-0700) +0.000209 +/- 0.016759 time.nist.gov 132.163.96.6 s1 no-leap > > > Checked, MY clock is dead on. > > Anyway, they took away my hardwire and gave me a 5G where the > antenna is many miles away. Weak signal almost always, perhaps > packet errors too. > > But why the Mint site so notably ??? Perhaps Mint's servers were put on the other side of another 5G gateway? > Weirdness spanned DAYS too. Or, perhaps the AI bots were busying downloading, in parallel, every file offered on the Mint website, over-saturating Mint's outbound network link.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-19 14:03 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <11649jq$2le0s$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #90085 |
On 19/08/2026 03:16, c186282 wrote: > Weak signal almost always, perhaps packet > errors too. > > But why the Mint site so notably ??? > Weirdness spanned DAYS too. Different mint servers have different loading at different times Its often better for me to download from other than UK based ones -- "Nature does not give up the winter because people dislike the cold." ― Confucius
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-19 22:24 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <e--dnUBUO5z_-Bv3nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #90121 |
On 8/19/26 09:03, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 19/08/2026 03:16, c186282 wrote: >> Weak signal almost always, perhaps packet >> errors too. >> >> But why the Mint site so notably ??? >> Weirdness spanned DAYS too. > > Different mint servers have different loading at different times > > Its often better for me to download from other than UK based ones Can't remember - but it MAY have been using a Euro site to serve the download. Anyway, the effect lasted for days.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-18 22:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <_46cnQkXs59Hkhj3nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #90039 |
On 8/18/26 02:05, rbowman wrote: > On Tue, 18 Aug 2026 01:44:51 -0400, c186282 wrote: > >> Tried FFox and Chromium the past few days. The site is ULTRA-slow, >> useless. > > Brave browser. Went to the site, paged through the instructions, went to > the Cinnamon download, selected the Clarkson mirror, and the download > started immediately. Canceled the download. > > Like I've said before you have a lot more problems than the average bear. It's true. In PART it's because I'm stuck with a somewhat balky 5G net connection. At times the signal strength goes to about naught, other times weird delays in transmission - packet errors ? It's why I was wondering about StarLink a little while back. Alas seems you need a pretty clear northeast 'view' from where I am - and I don't HAVE one ... big trees most everywhere. I'd have to run a 100' cable out under the yard to get a good clear point. StarLink MAY still be a viable "backup" however. Even a half-assed signal is better than none at all. Anyway, after a LONG wait, finally did get the download page to come up. Grabbed the latest XFCE version. Good enough.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-19 03:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nekn1aFe0jfU10@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #90083 |
On Tue, 18 Aug 2026 22:07:20 -0400, c186282 wrote: > It's why I was wondering about StarLink a little while back. Alas > seems you need a pretty clear northeast 'view' from where I am - and > I don't HAVE one ... big trees most everywhere. I'd have to run a > 100' cable out under the yard to get a good clear point. I was concerned about the tree but it's to the west and the receiver is oriented to 5 degrees. You can download the app for free to evaluate the site. You point the phone at the sky and rotate through 360. I was skeptical about the services using geosynchronous sats, the footprint, and how many subscribers would be in the beam. The Leos, and there are a lot of them, solve that problem. I am a bit curious how it works. Back in the day the ham sats were store and forwards and the window was only a few minutes. Of course there was only the one and not over 1000.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-19 02:14 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <KnydnRY2DeMh1Bj3nZ2dnZfqn_cAAAAA@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #90092 |
On 8/18/26 23:42, rbowman wrote: > On Tue, 18 Aug 2026 22:07:20 -0400, c186282 wrote: > >> It's why I was wondering about StarLink a little while back. Alas >> seems you need a pretty clear northeast 'view' from where I am - and >> I don't HAVE one ... big trees most everywhere. I'd have to run a >> 100' cable out under the yard to get a good clear point. > > I was concerned about the tree but it's to the west and the receiver is > oriented to 5 degrees. You can download the app for free to evaluate the > site. You point the phone at the sky and rotate through 360. I don't have the kind of phone that'll run "apps". > I was skeptical about the services using geosynchronous sats, the > footprint, and how many subscribers would be in the beam. The Leos, and > there are a lot of them, solve that problem. LONG back I put my office on geo-sync sat internet. It worked, and - sometimes - was faster than our old shotgunned dial-ups. Alas as web pages quickly became full of SHIT ... the signals bouncing 33,000 miles up and back and up and back REALLY dragged down the connection. Then the phone offered DSL and we used that for a long time. Sorry, even the speed of light is NOT nearly fast enough these days. StarLink kinda CHEATS - very low orbits and clever data-routing tricks. > I am a bit curious how it works. Back in the day the ham sats were store > and forwards and the window was only a few minutes. Of course there was > only the one and not over 1000. Well, StarLink is "in the works" even now. I think Musk still wants at least ten times as many sats, and the next-gen sats handle many more channels. A sort of extravagant system, but it's proven very useful and resistant to sabotage. ANYway, my geography is NOT so great for StarLink. It'd probably work but I'd never get the promised data speed. BIG trees everywhere. Also, their MOUNTING schemes ... searched Amazon and there was NOTHING really suitable for my house and likely weather conditions. I'd need to fab a hardwood frame and a 4-point mount to a concrete wall. Ordinary T-storm came through today ... gusts to maybe 60mph. It can get worse, much worse.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-19 14:13 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1164a5e$2le0s$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #90092 |
On 19/08/2026 04:42, rbowman wrote:
> I am a bit curious how it works. Back in the day the ham sats were store
> and forwards and the window was only a few minutes. Of course there was
> only the one and not over 1000.
Well starlink is simply an extreme case of IP routing. Your link will
pick the best signal and transmit a burst to that and your router will
be advertised as available via that satellite.
Clearly there is something like OSPF running inside starlinks network at
very high speed.
Ah.
Good old AI
"Starlink uses a custom, proprietary internal encapsulation and routing
protocol in space rather than standard Internet Protocol (IP) suites.
Standard routing protocols like OSPF or BGP cannot cope with thousands
of hyper-velocity LEO nodes changing topology every second.
Core Internal Architecture
=================
Encapsulation: Standard IPv4/IPv6 packets from user devices are
intercepted at the user terminal or Point of Presence (PoP) and wrapped
inside a lightweight, proprietary space-layer protocol.
Predictable Ephemera: Because orbital mechanics are mathematically
rigid, satellite trajectories and inter-satellite laser link (OISL)
handoffs are pre-computed on the ground rather than dynamically flooded
via traditional link-state advertisements.
Minimal Overhead: The custom layer strips out heavy traditional packet
headers to maximize data payload efficiency across space-to-ground radio
links and laser crosslinks.
Decoupled Edge: At the ground gateway or network POP, space packets are
de-encapsulated back into standard IPv4 (often via CGNAT 100.64.0.0/10)
or native IPv6 before handing off to the terrestrial internet backbone. "
So there ya go.It knows which satellites are going to be where and
routing is switched between them .
pretty cool tech. One thing's fer sure. The MusktRat never designed it
himself
--
Climate Change: Socialism wearing a lab coat.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web