Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #89440 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2026-08-02 06:17 +0000 |
| Last post | 2026-08-03 10:10 -0700 |
| Articles | 8 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc
ZDNet: “What We Really Think Of The Steam Machine” Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-02 06:17 +0000
Re: ZDNet: “What We Really Think Of The Steam Machine” VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2026-08-02 02:26 -0500
Re: ZDNet: “What We Really Think Of The Steam Machine” Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-02 07:38 +0000
Re: ZDNet: “What We Really Think Of The Steam Machine” VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2026-08-02 03:04 -0500
Re: ZDNet: “What We Really Think Of The Steam Machine” Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-02 08:34 +0000
Re: ZDNet: “What We Really Think Of The Steam Machine” Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-08-02 11:39 -0400
Re: ZDNet: “What We Really Think Of The Steam Machine” Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-02 23:00 +0000
Re: ZDNet: “What We Really Think Of The Steam Machine” John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-08-03 10:10 -0700
| From | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-02 06:17 +0000 |
| Subject | ZDNet: “What We Really Think Of The Steam Machine” |
| Message-ID | <114mneh$8d26$1@dont-email.me> |
Steam Machine review summary: interesting to see how the reviewers <https://www.zdnet.com/video/what-we-really-think-of-the-steam-machine/> take for granted features that a Windows-based PC cannot provide. One of them talks about taking the box into the living room, and using it there, without a second thought (or complaints from the spouse). Remember, Microsoft tried to do its “Living Room PC” thing with Windows Media Center, and failed. But this Linux-based SteamOS operates without any drama in that role. And then there is the well-known friction with everything Windows-based, including regularly having to download tons of updates before you can actually play your games. SteamOS actually gets close to the switch-on-and-go experience of a console, even as consoles themselves seem to be losing some of that smoothness themselves. Very likely, the attractiveness of the form factor will prompt vendors to launch Windows-based rivals, just as happened with the handheld Steam Deck. And just like with the Steam Deck, the awkwardness of Windows will simply throw the slickness of the Linux-based interface into even more stark relief; to the point where some of those competitors will want to adopt SteamOS for their offerings as well.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-02 02:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <us8hj47gxmdc$.dlg@v.nguard.lh> |
| In reply to | #89440 |
Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: > Steam Machine review summary: interesting to see how the reviewers > <https://www.zdnet.com/video/what-we-really-think-of-the-steam-machine/> > take for granted features that a Windows-based PC cannot provide. > > One of them talks about taking the box into the living room, and using > it there, without a second thought (or complaints from the spouse). > Remember, Microsoft tried to do its “Living Room PC” thing with > Windows Media Center, and failed. But this Linux-based SteamOS > operates without any drama in that role. > > And then there is the well-known friction with everything > Windows-based, including regularly having to download tons of updates > before you can actually play your games. SteamOS actually gets close > to the switch-on-and-go experience of a console, even as consoles > themselves seem to be losing some of that smoothness themselves. > > Very likely, the attractiveness of the form factor will prompt vendors > to launch Windows-based rivals, just as happened with the handheld > Steam Deck. And just like with the Steam Deck, the awkwardness of > Windows will simply throw the slickness of the Linux-based interface > into even more stark relief; to the point where some of those > competitors will want to adopt SteamOS for their offerings as well. Oh great. No article, just a video without a text transcription. In the video, a comment appears saying the price is $1049 for 512GB (which is probably the drive size, not the RAM). Pretty small storage capacity for a $1K box. Wouldn't take many video games to fill that up (for what is left after consumption by the OS, the Steam app, and whatever they bundled on the drive), especially since some games have fan missions that could occupy more than a terabyte of storage. https://store.steampowered.com/hardware/steammachine Shows pricing for better models. While they claim 4K video, even they recommend staying down at 1080 to avoid lag in gameplay. I'm not impressed, but then I don't a crappy computer setup. I jobbed my own high-end $2800 PC with a hell of lot more RAM, a hell of lot bigger nVME and SSD drives, and sustainable and stable 4K video. I didn't buy some prebuilt meant for business-only use. The Steam Machine would be a severe downgrade for me. Oh, wowie, it runs a Linux distro - SteamOS - but still has to use the Steam app. Seems every couple days when I load the Steam app that I have to wait until it completes yet another update. And sometimes it also lags on logging in. And there are which games you can play on this. Does the Steam app ensure it present or offers games that have been curated as playable on this box? With the low FPS on this box for 4K games, they should also mentioned Steam's recommendation for video resolution on this box (which will probably the 1080p they downgraded their claim, and changing their claim to "up to" 4K). Or, are users yet again left to hoping a game they want to buy, download, and play will work on this box? Oh, and right now you can only join a waitlist hoping to get one, but not knowing when.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-02 07:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <114ms5m$a1e3$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #89443 |
On Sun, 2 Aug 2026 02:26:16 -0500, VanguardLH wrote: > Oh, wowie, it runs a Linux distro - SteamOS - but still has to use > the Steam app. Seems every couple days when I load the Steam app > that I have to wait until it completes yet another update. And > sometimes it also lags on logging in. Well-known Windows-specific problems, in other words ... > And there are which games you can play on this. Does the Steam app > ensure it present or offers games that have been curated as playable > on this box? There are lots of games that have been validated for SteamOS. As mentioned in the video, some even offer presets that are optimized for Steam Deck/Steam Box.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-02 03:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pvzzy8r538xk$.dlg@v.nguard.lh> |
| In reply to | #89444 |
Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: > On Sun, 2 Aug 2026 02:26:16 -0500, VanguardLH wrote: > >> Oh, wowie, it runs a Linux distro - SteamOS - but still has to use >> the Steam app. Seems every couple days when I load the Steam app >> that I have to wait until it completes yet another update. And >> sometimes it also lags on logging in. > > Well-known Windows-specific problems, in other words ... Nothing to do under which OS the Steam app runs. The app has to get updated, and often. As for lags during login, no user on any platform controls the responsiveness of the authentication server. It's not just the Steam app that gets updated. It's also the Steam games. See https://steamdb.info/patchnotes/. Presumably on a Steam box, the Steam app is configured to load on OS startup, and stay loaded. The app and game updates probably occur in the background, but that doesn't obviate they happen. I could leave the Steam app running all the time on my Windows box, too, but I don't, and why I notice when it lags on load to perform updates. >> And there are which games you can play on this. Does the Steam app >> ensure it present or offers games that have been curated as playable >> on this box? > > There are lots of games that have been validated for SteamOS. As > mentioned in the video, some even offer presets that are optimized for > Steam Deck/Steam Box. When using the Steam app to visit the Steam store, does it actually flag which games are curated for the Steam Machine platform? You saying some games are doesn't mean the users are informed instead of having to research it before buying. Sound like you don't know. I do know that what the Steam app lists at the Steam Store does *NOT* check sysreqs for my platform against the games they list.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-02 08:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <114mvef$b2ug$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #89446 |
On Sun, 2 Aug 2026 03:04:39 -0500, VanguardLH wrote: > The app and game updates probably occur in the background, but that > doesn't obviate they happen. On Windows, you have this problem that files that are currently open in some running process are “locked”, and cannot be updated without quitting the offending process, and restarting it afterwards. And if that “process” happens to be buried deep inside the kernel, then a system restart becomes mandatory. On Linux, this happens a bit more seamlessly.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-02 11:39 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <114noc1$jj6g$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #89444 |
On Sun, 8/2/2026 3:38 AM, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > On Sun, 2 Aug 2026 02:26:16 -0500, VanguardLH wrote: > >> Oh, wowie, it runs a Linux distro - SteamOS - but still has to use >> the Steam app. Seems every couple days when I load the Steam app >> that I have to wait until it completes yet another update. And >> sometimes it also lags on logging in. > > Well-known Windows-specific problems, in other words ... > >> And there are which games you can play on this. Does the Steam app >> ensure it present or offers games that have been curated as playable >> on this box? > > There are lots of games that have been validated for SteamOS. As > mentioned in the video, some even offer presets that are optimized for > Steam Deck/Steam Box. > You wouldn't be much of a gamer, if you didn't hack your system. There is at least one third-party item for Patch Tuesday control. The highest friction item on an install, is the anti-cheat software, which now has a TPM dependency. A machine without a TPM is unlikely to be a good candidate for commercial gaming. The Win11 23H2 I have in a VM right now on the machine, the last Patch Tuesday for that is 2025-11. I am expected to do a Version Upgrade, if I want the Patch Tuesday to deliver more current patches. Only 24H2 and 25H2 would be receiving Patch Tuesday. Paul
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-02 23:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <114oi71$rsgh$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #89473 |
On Sun, 2 Aug 2026 11:39:45 -0400, Paul wrote: > The highest friction item on an install, is the anti-cheat software, > which now has a TPM dependency. A machine without a TPM is unlikely > to be a good candidate for commercial gaming. The games that demand this strict anti-cheat compliance are very firmly in the minority, and seem destined to stay that way. I’ve said it before, I think the problem will solve itself, just through the action of good old market forces: the user experience on the SteamOS devices is compelling enough that they will become more and more popular. And as that happens, the makers of the games that refuse to run on SteamOS will find themselves leaving more and more money on the table, which is not a rational way to run a business.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-03 10:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <20260803101004.00001ef2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #89484 |
On Sun, 2 Aug 2026 23:00:49 -0000 (UTC) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: > The games that demand this strict anti-cheat compliance are very > firmly in the minority, and seem destined to stay that way. I cannot imagine wanting to play a game badly enough that I'd let some pervert corporation install spyware on my system for it.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web