Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #14813
| From | Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Cloud hosting - good groups or forums? |
| Date | 2015-05-20 13:06 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vu9u2c-ps9.ln1@squidward.dionic.net> (permalink) |
| References | <gfks2c-n8p.ln1@squidward.dionic.net> <mjgj1l$9q6$2@dont-email.me> |
On 20/05/15 00:05, Bruce Sinclair wrote: >> (Who said outsourcing saves money?) > > > Ooo! ... ooo ! I know this one ... pick me ! ... > > > .. the outsourcers (of course :) ). > Re: Amazon EC2: http://blog.awe.sm/2012/12/18/aws-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/#~pde2twD6CvrBTH "Virtual hardware doesn’t last as long as real hardware. Our average observed lifetime for a virtual machine on EC2 over the last 3 years has been about 200 days. After that, the chances of it being “retired” rise hugely. And Amazon’s “retirement” process is unpredictable: sometime they’ll notify you ten days in advance that a box is going to be shut down; sometimes the retirement notification email arrives 2 hours after the box has already failed. Rapidly-failing hardware is not too big a deal — it’s easy to spin up fresh hardware, after all — but it’s important to be aware of it, and invest in deployment automation early, to limit the amount of time you need to burn replacing boxes all the time." That horrifies me. I can see the point of EC2 for spinning up loads of short lived VMs for a big compute job - or as media servers where it is assumed there are N identical servers and they are individually redundant. But for "proper servers" it looks a hopeless service - no to mention the lack of console access.
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Cloud hosting - good groups or forums? Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-05-19 21:53 +0100
Re: Cloud hosting - good groups or forums? noydb@no.way (Bruce Sinclair) - 2015-05-19 23:05 +0000
Re: Cloud hosting - good groups or forums? Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-05-20 07:55 +0100
Re: Cloud hosting - good groups or forums? Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-05-20 08:14 +0100
Re: Cloud hosting - good groups or forums? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-20 09:26 +0100
Re: Cloud hosting - good groups or forums? Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-05-20 10:26 +0100
Re: Cloud hosting - good groups or forums? Joe Beanfish <joebeanfish@nospam.duh> - 2015-05-20 13:44 +0000
Re: Cloud hosting - good groups or forums? Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-05-20 15:31 +0100
Re: Cloud hosting - good groups or forums? Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-05-20 13:06 +0100
Re: Cloud hosting - good groups or forums? Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-05-20 08:46 +0100
Re: Cloud hosting - good groups or forums? Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-05-21 11:11 +0100
Re: Cloud hosting - good groups or forums? Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2015-05-21 12:27 +0200
Re: Cloud hosting - good groups or forums? Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-05-21 14:52 +0100
Re: Cloud hosting - good groups or forums? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-21 22:51 +0100
Re: Cloud hosting - good groups or forums? Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-05-21 23:57 +0100
Re: Cloud hosting - good groups or forums? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-22 00:07 +0100
Re: Cloud hosting - good groups or forums? Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-05-22 08:54 +0100
csiph-web