Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #8569
| From | Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: How do you pronounce Linux? |
| Date | 2013-06-25 03:56 +0000 |
| Organization | none-at-all |
| Message-ID | <slrnksi589.5tv.spamtrap42@one.localnet> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <HyCwt.63253$hw2.55626@newsfe04.iad> <kpuvt1$ti7$2@dont-email.me> <Zfcxt.64038$hw2.6278@newsfe04.iad> <kq3jtc$a1n$1@dont-email.me> <MBTxt.81598$x%1.9430@newsfe10.iad> |
On 2013-06-24, unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> wrote: > On 2013-06-22, Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> wrote: >> On Saturday 22 June 2013 09:21, unruh conveyed the following to >> comp.os.linux.misc... >> >>> On 2013-06-20, Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> On Thursday 20 June 2013 14:27, unruh conveyed the following to >>>> comp.os.linux.misc... >>>> >>>>> On 2013-06-20, Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> it in any way. Free Software is software which may or may not >>>>>> be distributed commercially - e.g. RedHat EL is Free Software, >>>>>> but it is only available from RedHat itself as a commercial >>>>>> bundle, which >>> >>>>> >>>>> No. Redhat ELsoftware is specifically released under GPL, and any >>>>> further restrictions (eg restrictions which they have at times tried >>>>> to impose related to trademarks etc) are clearly in violation of the >>>>> GPL and can thus be ignored. Their support contract is proprietary, >>>>> but the software is not. >>>> >>>> Uhh, that's what I said, Bill. >>> >>> ?? Sorry that was not how \i read 'It is only available from Redhat >>> itself as a commercial bundle' >> >> That was a reference in particular to RedHat Enterprise Linux, which is >> a commercial bundle, comprised of Free Software, possibly a few bits of >> proprietary software and a limited support contract. There was a hyphen >> separating that part about RedHat from the rest of my sentence. ;-) >> >> That said, those who do actually want to use a RHEL without paying for >> it and without the support contract can always download CentOS, which is >> identical to RedHat (in terms of the software packages) except for the >> branding, the omission of non-free software and of course the absence of >> a support contract. > > Agreed. However, the GPL explicitly states that any attempt to reduce > the rights of the user, including proprietary software, trademarks, etc. > invalidates the permission to distribute the GPL material. Redhat does > use trademarks/proprietary software to attempt to limit theuserr's > rights to run and distribute the GPL software. That means that Redhat > has no right to distribute the software, (but anyone who gets it does > have the right to use and distrribute it). > The support contract is of course up to them, but the updates to the > software is also GPL and if it is distributed to anyone it must be > available (or can be made available) to all. Redhat has long tried hard ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > to skirt the legal edges of the GPL, spending most of their time outside > those edges. There's a rather subtle issue with the highlighted phrase above: If HatRed distributes GPL software to someone (let's call that person party B), HatRed is under _NO_ obligation to distribute said GPL software to anyone else. Neither is party B obligated to redistribute said GPL software. What the GPL requires is that HatRed cannot prohibit party B (who received the software from HatRed) from redistributing it to anyone else party B wishes to redistribute it to. I agree HatRed has spent a great deal of their recent time outside the lines. -- Robert Riches spamtrap42@jacob21819.net (Yes, that is one of my email addresses.)
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: How do you pronounce Linux? Kevin <kevhod@gmail.com> - 2013-06-19 04:11 -0700
Re: How do you pronounce Linux? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2013-06-19 12:32 -0400
Re: How do you pronounce Linux? Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2013-06-20 04:43 +0200
Re: How do you pronounce Linux? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-06-20 12:27 +0000
Re: How do you pronounce Linux? Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2013-06-20 15:30 +0200
Re: How do you pronounce Linux? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-06-22 07:21 +0000
Re: How do you pronounce Linux? Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2013-06-22 09:37 +0200
Re: How do you pronounce Linux? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-06-24 08:40 +0000
Re: How do you pronounce Linux? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2013-06-25 03:56 +0000
Re: How do you pronounce Linux? Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2013-06-25 07:02 +0200
Re: How do you pronounce Linux? Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2013-06-20 08:31 -0700
Re: How do you pronounce Linux? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-06-20 12:20 +0000
csiph-web