Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #32743
| From | FR <fr@random.info> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.os.linux, comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: US-ASCII is a subset of the set of Unicode code points. |
| Followup-To | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Date | 2021-08-06 17:57 +0000 |
| Organization | NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95 |
| Message-ID | <sejt5s02us@news3.newsguy.com> (permalink) |
| References | <sejhjm022lo@news2.newsguy.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Aug.6--8.15am.Seattle.2021> <sejkuh$1nj1$1@gioia.aioe.org> <sejllr026a9@news4.newsguy.com> <sejr9n02b17@news4.newsguy.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Followups directed to: comp.os.linux.advocacy
On Fri, 06 Aug 2021 17:25:11 +0000, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > On 2021-08-06, FR <fr@random.info> wrote: > >> On Fri, 06 Aug 2021 17:36:37 +0200, R.Wieser wrote: >> > > To sum up, there is whitespace and there is whitespace. The > differences between the various characters may be subtle, but > that doesn't mean that you should treat them all the same. > Each has its own special use. > Whitespace can be independent of format. When doing a search, for example, a whitespace char is simply skipped over. Formatting is also something that is independent of a particular character set. Formatting is achieved by an application such as a word processor, type setter, etc. that would use its own internal codes and not that of the charset. Although the old ASCII format codes are still present in Unicode they, aside from EOL, should not be interpreted as such when processing a UTF-8 text file, for example. In Unicode their interpretation is ambiguous. Anyone composing with UTF-8 would never use them. Unicode does have many unambiguous formatting characters such as U+2028, line separator, and U+2029, paragraph separator, but, not being an expert in Unicode, I wouldn't know how or where to use them. Unicode is supposed to provide the symbols but not the formatting instructions. Some languages might require special codes for a proper construction, but this is not the same as formatting.
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Any Unicode Experts? FR <fr@random.info> - 2021-08-06 14:39 +0000
Re: Any Unicode Experts? FR <fr@random.info> - 2021-08-06 15:01 +0000
US-ASCII is a subset of the set of Unicode code points. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-08-06 08:15 -0700
Re: US-ASCII is a subset of the set of Unicode code points. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2021-08-06 17:36 +0200
Re: US-ASCII is a subset of the set of Unicode code points. FR <fr@random.info> - 2021-08-06 15:49 +0000
Re: US-ASCII is a subset of the set of Unicode code points. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2021-08-06 18:48 +0200
Re: US-ASCII is a subset of the set of Unicode code points. FR <fr@random.info> - 2021-08-06 17:57 +0000
Re: Any Unicode Experts? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-08-06 18:10 +0000
Re: Any Unicode Experts? Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2021-08-06 20:27 +0000
Re: Any Unicode Experts? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-08-07 09:36 +0100
Re: Any Unicode Experts? Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2021-08-08 04:32 +0000
Re: Any Unicode Experts? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-08-07 22:50 -0600
Re: Any Unicode Experts? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-08-08 17:27 +0000
Re: Any Unicode Experts? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-08-08 20:21 +0200
Re: Any Unicode Experts? Jack Strangio <jackstrangio@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-09 13:58 +0000
Re: Any Unicode Experts? jak <nospam@please.ty> - 2021-08-08 20:32 +0200
Re: Any Unicode Experts? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-08-08 18:00 -0600
"while(1);" borks Visual Studio. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-08-08 18:11 -0700
Re: "while(1);" borks Visual Studio. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-08-08 22:19 -0600
Re: "while(1);" borks Visual Studio. Soviet_Mario <SovietMario@CCCP.MIR> - 2021-08-16 16:06 +0200
Re: "while(1);" borks Visual Studio. jak <nospam@please.ty> - 2021-08-10 18:02 +0200
while(malloc(666)); Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-08-10 09:28 -0700
Re: while(malloc(666)); jak <nospam@please.ty> - 2021-08-10 18:39 +0200
Re: Any Unicode Experts? jak <nospam@please.ty> - 2021-08-09 07:28 +0200
Re: Any Unicode Experts? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-08-09 07:56 -0600
Re: Any Unicode Experts? jak <nospam@please.ty> - 2021-08-10 10:33 +0200
Re: Any Unicode Experts? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-08-10 12:49 +0100
Re: Any Unicode Experts? jak <nospam@please.ty> - 2021-08-10 15:26 +0200
Re: Any Unicode Experts? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2021-08-10 13:43 +0000
Re: Any Unicode Experts? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-08-10 21:12 -0600
Re: Any Unicode Experts? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-08-11 12:25 +0100
Re: Any Unicode Experts? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-08-11 16:52 +0000
Re: Any Unicode Experts? jak <nospam@please.ty> - 2021-08-11 20:19 +0200
Re: Any Unicode Experts? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-08-12 16:37 +0000
Re: Any Unicode Experts? jak <nospam@please.ty> - 2021-08-12 20:32 +0200
Re: Any Unicode Experts? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-08-12 20:40 -0600
Re: Any Unicode Experts? Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-08-10 16:11 -0400
Re: Any Unicode Experts? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2021-08-13 17:42 +0000
csiph-web