Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #17036

Re: How do *nix machos handle M$ problems?

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Unknown <dog@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.misc
Subject Re: How do *nix machos handle M$ problems?
Date Thu, 17 Mar 2016 09:42:51 -0000 (UTC)
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 29
Message-ID <pan.2016.03.17.19.47.13@gmail.com> (permalink)
References <n5i7ap@dont-email.me> <n5k3pncq@news.xmission.com> <4ffdf217fbcdd908d0f1596646de0a24@remailer.privacy.at> <n5n1v4$1dk$1@news.xmission.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
Injection-Date Thu, 17 Mar 2016 09:42:51 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="878ab2efada68a7f7a2b4b004f42f337"; logging-data="19080"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/mCgfhPU/gHZ8BPNvxmdcSdG8sDvnzCU8="
User-Agent Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies)
Cancel-Lock sha1:SORDZ165e3mjIobTkZw4ic3Atcs=
Xref csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:17036

Show key headers only | View raw


On Sat, 26 Dec 2015 21:48:20 +0000, Kenny McCormack wrote:

> In article <4ffdf217fbcdd908d0f1596646de0a24@remailer.privacy.at>,
> Anonymous Remailer (austria) <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> ranted and
> raved:
>>
>>Kenny McCormack <gaze...@shell.xmission.com> [KM]: KM>     1) It /is/
>>more restrictive in what are legal filename KM>     characters.  IMHO,
>>the Unix method (of allowing just about KM>     anything) is just plain
>>nuts.
>>
>>If all unix users lived in an english speaking country, then ASCII
>>characters plus a few punctuation marks for filenames might suffice. Now
>>japanese and korean people obviously cannot say the same. The world out
>>there is bigger than what we think and your notion of "legal" does not
>>apply universally... Unicode and its various encodings are the norm for
>>millions of people, who don't share (and don't give a dime about) your
>>view of what is legal.
>>
>>It's a good thing that unix, although invented and first used in the US,
>>does not impose ad-hoc unnecessary restrictions on filenames. Learn how
>>to live with this.
>>
Yes catering for japanese and korean and Arabic, Cyrillic, Hindi ...
via Unicode is great.
But messing ASCII for ENGLISH by replacing the quote with 3 bytes is
ABSURD!!

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: How do *nix machos handle M$ problems? "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2015-12-26 16:30 +0100
  Re: How do *nix machos handle M$ problems? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-12-26 21:48 +0000
    Re: How do *nix machos handle M$ problems? J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2015-12-27 00:06 +0000
      Re: How do *nix machos handle M$ problems? Caver1 <caver1@inthemud.org> - 2015-12-26 19:24 -0500
        Re: How do *nix machos handle M$ problems? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-03 05:27 +0000
          Re: How do *nix machos handle M$ problems? Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2016-01-02 22:05 -0800
    Re: How do *nix machos handle M$ problems? Unknown <dog@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 09:42 +0000
      Re: How do *nix machos handle M$ problems? "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2016-03-17 16:30 +0100
        Re: How do *nix machos handle M$ problems? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2016-03-17 15:54 +0000

csiph-web