Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #94862
| Path | csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV |
| Date | 31 Oct 2026 19:21:19 GMT |
| Lines | 8 |
| Message-ID | <nkmtdfFftq4U3@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <18e37e973e22a7a6$1$3179723$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <8733tmaqnk.fsf@atr2.ath.cx> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net KD8EgaNGcykIQN5J0hanjAdVLie/1+WvIOFzkYjmpOCnunTagb |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:WGfUYUG/YPLdRZ82Ams7G8FRpdM= sha256:yX9wBwklr1WIZAa4lXqZK+e3lu6+G1OQcJ8I98Xmh5k= |
| User-Agent | Pan/0.165 (Kostiantynivka) |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:94862 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Sat, 31 Oct 2026 10:30:39 -0400, jayjwa wrote: > If you're not building such things, you probably don't need it. I hear > the LLVM license is more permissive, though that doesn't affect me. It now uses the Apache 2.0 license as does Clang. Apple originally tried to use gcc with LLVM for Objective C. There were technical difficulties plus the GPL.
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-10-31 03:11 +0000
Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2026-10-31 17:28 +1000
Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-10-31 13:25 +0000
Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV jayjwa <jayjwa@atr2.ath.cx.invalid> - 2026-10-31 10:30 -0400
Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-10-31 15:12 +0000
Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-31 19:21 +0000
Re: GCC vs. LLVM Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-10-31 21:06 +0000
Re: GCC vs. LLVM Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-11-01 00:39 +0000
Re: GCC vs. LLVM rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-11-01 01:45 +0000
Re: GCC vs. LLVM Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-11-01 09:05 +0000
Re: GCC vs. LLVM c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-11-01 03:51 -0500
Re: GCC vs. LLVM Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-11-01 02:16 -0800
Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-11-01 10:07 -0500
Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-11-01 18:31 +0000
csiph-web