Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #14243
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Segfaults in 64-bit CentOS-6.6 |
| Followup-To | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Date | Tue, 24 Mar 2015 23:29:07 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Strider |
| Lines | 25 |
| Message-ID | <mesoe0$ikk$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <mep4fs$cqj$1@speranza.aioe.org> <wwvd23zg7js.fsf@l1AntVDjLrnP7Td3DQJ8ynzIq3lJMueXf87AxnpFoA.invalid> <merdst$2ab$1@speranza.aioe.org> <wwv4mpag02j.fsf@l1AntVDjLrnP7Td3DQJ8ynzIq3lJMueXf87AxnpFoA.invalid> <5hv8ub-cit2.ln1@raspberry-pi.bildanet.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7Bit |
| Injection-Date | Tue, 24 Mar 2015 22:28:16 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="00d654397a8151dbdcd9d574bc97ac16"; logging-data="19092"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1++3sWDkutoTa+7aF4ZWB85" |
| User-Agent | KNode/4.4.11 |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:sUzkFOi7n6oa/E2LkAVFPK2PKBM= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:14243 |
Followups directed to: comp.os.linux.misc
Show key headers only | View raw
On Tuesday 24 March 2015 21:54, Baho Utot conveyed the following to
comp.os.linux.misc...
> On 03/24/15 06:29, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
>
>> "J.B. Wood" <arl_123234@hotmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Hello, and thank you for the reply. I have 2 GB of memory installed
>>> in the 9100 and I ran the Dell BIOS memory test (the one that's
>>> usually bypassed by default) at power-on. I did receive error
>>> messages. Sincerely,
>>
>> Most likely faulty RAM then (although CPU, motherboard and other
>> parts are also possibilities).
>
> You just won the "No Shit Sherlock" award for this month.
>
> Thanks for playing
However, the Captain Obvious Award has not yet been extended, so we're
still accepting nominations! :-D
--
= Aragorn =
http://www.linuxcounter.net - registrant #223157
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Segfaults in 64-bit CentOS-6.6 "J.B. Wood" <arl_123234@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-23 09:29 -0400
Re: Segfaults in 64-bit CentOS-6.6 Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2015-03-23 13:36 +0000
Re: Segfaults in 64-bit CentOS-6.6 philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2015-03-23 15:39 -0500
Re: Segfaults in 64-bit CentOS-6.6 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-03-23 21:51 +0000
Re: Segfaults in 64-bit CentOS-6.6 philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2015-03-23 17:35 -0500
Re: Segfaults in 64-bit CentOS-6.6 "J.B. Wood" <arl_123234@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-24 06:22 -0400
Re: Segfaults in 64-bit CentOS-6.6 Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2015-03-24 10:29 +0000
Re: Segfaults in 64-bit CentOS-6.6 Baho Utot <baho-utot@columbus.rr.com> - 2015-03-24 16:54 -0400
Re: Segfaults in 64-bit CentOS-6.6 Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2015-03-24 23:29 +0100
Re: Segfaults in 64-bit CentOS-6.6 philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2015-03-24 08:39 -0500
csiph-web