Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #13585
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: operating systems design |
| Date | 2015-02-03 20:52 +0000 |
| Organization | NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95 |
| Message-ID | <marcdt122sh@news6.newsguy.com> (permalink) |
| References | <maeb6o$sn9$1@reader1.panix.com> <map3hb$dcc$3@news.albasani.net> |
On 2015-02-03, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: > I think what he means is that having a set of specific ISRs on a per > hardware basis is preferable to having one ISR and polling all the > hardware to find out which one did it, and then vectoring to ITS ISR On the other hand, you could have a master ISR to which the hardware presents the address of the interrupting device, and this could be used to index into a table of vectors to subsidiary ISRs appropriate to each device. (This table could be built at boot time by scanning for and identifying attached devices - or, as in the bad old days, the table could be hard-coded as a result of the sysgen process.) -- /~\ cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid (Charlie Gibbs) \ / I'm really at ac.dekanfrus if you read it the right way. X Top-posted messages will probably be ignored. See RFC1855. / \ HTML will DEFINITELY be ignored. Join the ASCII ribbon campaign!
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
operating systems design ruben safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com> - 2015-01-29 17:11 -0500
Re: operating systems design Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-01-29 22:29 +0000
Re: operating systems design ruben safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com> - 2015-01-30 08:19 -0500
Re: operating systems design "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2015-01-30 09:01 -0500
Re: operating systems design Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2015-01-30 08:07 -0600
Re: operating systems design Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2015-01-30 15:43 +0100
Re: operating systems design Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2015-01-30 09:09 -0600
Re: operating systems design Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-01-30 15:21 +0000
Re: operating systems design Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2015-01-30 11:27 -0600
Re: operating systems design Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-01-30 19:10 +0000
Re: operating systems design Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8@verizon.net> - 2015-02-02 08:29 -0500
Re: operating systems design Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-02-02 15:09 +0000
Re: operating systems design The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-02-03 00:11 +0000
Re: operating systems design Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2015-01-30 09:28 +0100
Re: operating systems design The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-02-03 00:08 +0000
Re: operating systems design Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-02-03 20:52 +0000
Re: operating systems design The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-02-03 21:06 +0000
Re: operating systems design Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-02-03 21:19 +0000
csiph-web