Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #11096

Re: pthread mutex used like a semaphore. Why does it work?

From "Charles T. Smith" <cts.private.yahoo@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.misc
Subject Re: pthread mutex used like a semaphore. Why does it work?
Date 2014-05-19 08:16 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <llceki$2ob$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <llavfa$tsr$1@dont-email.me> <llc8il$kc6$7@news.httrack.net>

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, 19 May 2014 08:32:53 +0200, Xavier Roche wrote:

> On 05/18/2014 08:51 PM, Charles T. Smith wrote:
>> I'm looking at a piece of code where one thread locks a mutex at
>> regular intervals and a different thread frees that lock.  I thought it
>> was an error for a different thread to free a mutex, but it seems to be
>> working and there's no error code.
> 
> It probably "works", but it is also probably... not thread-safe.

In what way, not thread-safe?  You mean if there were more than these two 
threads?  I mean, if it works in this, the intended case, then what could 
be unsafe about it...

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

pthread mutex used like a semaphore.  Why does it work? "Charles T. Smith" <cts.private.yahoo@gmail.com> - 2014-05-18 18:51 +0000
  Re: pthread mutex used like a semaphore.  Why does it work? "Charles T. Smith" <cts.private.yahoo@gmail.com> - 2014-05-18 19:26 +0000
  Re: pthread mutex used like a semaphore.  Why does it work? Xavier Roche <xroche@free.fr.NOSPAM.invalid> - 2014-05-19 08:32 +0200
    Re: pthread mutex used like a semaphore.  Why does it work? "Charles T. Smith" <cts.private.yahoo@gmail.com> - 2014-05-19 08:16 +0000
  Re: pthread mutex used like a semaphore.  Why does it work? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2014-05-19 09:12 +0100
    Re: pthread mutex used like a semaphore.  Why does it work? "Charles T. Smith" <cts.private.yahoo@gmail.com> - 2014-05-19 08:27 +0000
  Re: pthread mutex used like a semaphore.  Why does it work? Mark <i@dontgetlotsofspamanymore.invalid> - 2014-05-19 10:50 +0100
  Re: pthread mutex used like a semaphore.  Why does it work? Chick Tower <c.tower@deadspam.com> - 2014-05-19 19:16 +0000
    Re: pthread mutex used like a semaphore.  Why does it work? "Charles T. Smith" <cts.private.yahoo@gmail.com> - 2014-05-20 10:24 +0000
      Re: pthread mutex used like a semaphore.  Why does it work? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-05-20 21:27 +0200
      Re: pthread mutex used like a semaphore.  Why does it work? Chick Tower <c.tower@deadspam.com> - 2014-05-21 02:22 +0000
    Re: pthread mutex used like a semaphore.  Why does it work? Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2014-05-20 22:33 -0400
  Re: pthread mutex used like a semaphore.  Why does it work? James Moe <jimoeDESPAM@sohnen-moe.com> - 2014-05-20 11:13 -0700
    Re: pthread mutex used like a semaphore.  Why does it work? "Charles T. Smith" <cts.private.yahoo@gmail.com> - 2014-05-20 19:39 +0000
      Re: pthread mutex used like a semaphore.  Why does it work? Mark <i@dontgetlotsofspamanymore.invalid> - 2014-05-22 08:59 +0100

csiph-web