Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #7807
| From | Joe Beanfish <joebeanfish@nospam.duh> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.networking, comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Mental-model of multiprocessing? |
| Date | 2013-04-08 14:47 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <kjula5$cpl$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <rovg2ax8ap.ln2@news.roaima.co.uk> <kj500f$qll$1@dont-email.me> <kjc9b1$nf5$1@dont-email.me> <kjgnhc$qbf$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 08:00:35 +0000, Unknown wrote: > What *is* EOF for cat's stdIn? <EnterKey> ? Nothing to do with "cat". If stdin is a file EOF is when all of the file is read. If stdin is a pipe EOF is when the writer closes the pipe. If stdin is a terminal EOF is typically ^D at the beginning of a line but can be changed by stty. There are exceptions, like if non-blocking is set, but those are the norms. > BTW, I've been telling myself and others how good *nix is, because it > uses the concatenative paradigm: where you can pipe transformations. > And if stage N tests OK, you don't need to worry/remember previous > stages. > Now I find that, in this example, if the ()-block is 222-lines, you only > find at the END what FD3 is. So you've got to carry that info all that > way. That's crap !! One can write well structured, modular, reusable code in just about any language on just about any OS. One can also write complete shinola in those same languages and systems. Don't blame the tools for how people use them.
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Mental-model of multiprocessing? Avoid9Pdf@gmail.com - 2013-03-27 11:13 +0000
Re: Mental-model of multiprocessing? Joe Beanfish <joebeanfish@nospam.duh> - 2013-03-27 14:02 +0000
Re: Mental-model of multiprocessing? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2013-03-27 14:13 +0000
Re: Mental-model of multiprocessing? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-03-27 14:35 +0000
Re: Mental-model of multiprocessing? Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2013-03-27 15:30 +0000
Re: Mental-model of multiprocessing? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-03-27 18:57 +0000
Re: Mental-model of multiprocessing? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2013-03-27 21:15 +0000
Re: Mental-model of multiprocessing? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-03-27 21:36 +0000
Re: Mental-model of multiprocessing? Aragorn <stryder@telenet.be.invalid> - 2013-03-28 06:56 +0100
Re: Mental-model of multiprocessing? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2013-03-27 21:47 +0000
Re: Mental-model of multiprocessing? Avoid9Pdf@gmail.com - 2013-03-29 14:28 +0000
Re: Mental-model of multiprocessing? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-03-29 15:32 +0000
Re: Mental-model of multiprocessing? J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2013-03-29 22:36 +0000
Re: Mental-model of multiprocessing? Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2013-03-29 17:31 +0000
Re: Mental-model of multiprocessing? Avoid9Pdf@gmail.com - 2013-03-29 21:10 +0000
Re: Mental-model of multiprocessing? "Chris F.A. Johnson" <cfajohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-03-29 18:55 -0400
Re: Mental-model of multiprocessing? Unknown <dog@gmail.com> - 2013-03-30 06:01 +0000
Re: Mental-model of multiprocessing? Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2013-03-30 21:28 +0000
Re: Mental-model of multiprocessing? Joe Beanfish <joebeanfish@nospam.duh> - 2013-04-01 15:32 +0000
Re: Mental-model of multiprocessing? Unknown <dog@gmail.com> - 2013-04-03 08:00 +0000
Re: Mental-model of multiprocessing? Joe Beanfish <joebeanfish@nospam.duh> - 2013-04-08 14:47 +0000
Re: Mental-model of multiprocessing? Unknown <dog@gmail.com> - 2013-04-03 08:02 +0000
csiph-web