Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #24593
| Path | csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!news.unit0.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.os.linux, comp.os.linux.misc, alt.comp.os.windows-10 |
| Subject | Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed |
| Date | Thu, 27 Sep 2018 11:22:54 -0400 |
| Lines | 41 |
| Message-ID | <g14aueFfdg9U2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <309a76cf8bed5568f4d87d680befa055@msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <g0quv3Fhk7dU1@mid.individual.net> <poamea$asa$1@news.mixmin.net> <g0skjkFs60rU1@mid.individual.net> <podcge$9e1$1@news.mixmin.net> <g0uusnFc6hmU2@mid.individual.net> <750q7f-n4a.ln1@gangtai.home.grep.be> <g120ohFvegU1@mid.individual.net> <260920181424291054%nospam@nospam.invalid> <g122hjF19bmU1@mid.individual.net> <260920181456366663%nospam@nospam.invalid> <g12t2oF6en0U1@mid.individual.net> <pohr70$sme$1@dont-email.me> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net jqVqDH80a5J4NEv0/50hlgxXCJ3B2tuMxQGQW0PpiEpH1U/+/p |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:y8tB0WCo0zu0BpLdbpdiXjFxfaE= |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <pohr70$sme$1@dont-email.me> |
| Content-Language | en-CA |
| Xref | csiph.com alt.privacy.anon-server:66403 alt.os.linux:50975 comp.os.linux.misc:24593 alt.comp.os.windows-10:75133 |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
On 27/09/2018 01.52, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 27/09/18 03:20, Carlos E. R. wrote:
>> On 26/09/2018 14.56, nospam wrote:
>>> In article <g122hjF19bmU1@mid.individual.net>, Carlos E. R.
>>> <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> People with which I needed to use encryption were unable to set any
>>>>>> encryption method up. A lawyer, for instance. I would have to go
>>>>>> to his
>>>>>> office and teach him.
>>>>>
>>>>> use an encrypted email service. there's nothing to set up. all they
>>>>> need is a browser or an app on their phone.
>>>>
>>>> That would require a binding contract and spend money, which they did
>>>> not want to do.
>>>
>>> no it wouldn't. it only needs a mutual agreement to use an encrypted
>>> medium. there are free options as well as paid ones. choose whichever
>>> one works best for all parties involved.
>>
>> Not for a lawyer, it wouldn't. He would be directly liable if the email
>> gets intercepted or somehow compromised.
>>
>>>
>>> lawyers should be using such a system anyway because they are required
>>> to keep certain information confidential.
>>
>> Good old paper and couriers.
>>
>>
> A lawuer recently requitred me to use a secure logon to download email
> because at some level their mail system identifed that I wasnt using TLS
> or something.
Google might say that thing, too. I read something about it.
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201809.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2018-09-23 19:45 +0000
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:03 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-24 10:27 +0000
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed anon <noreply@mixnym.net> - 2018-09-24 07:48 -0500
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-24 13:18 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed anon <noreply@mixnym.net> - 2018-09-25 08:16 -0500
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-25 10:26 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Wouter Verhelst <w@uter.be> - 2018-09-25 17:17 +0200
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:16 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:24 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:47 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:56 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-26 22:20 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 00:43 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-27 11:21 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 11:52 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:10 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:15 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-27 14:31 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-09-27 20:07 +0000
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 16:39 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-28 09:45 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 09:52 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-28 14:22 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 14:26 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:43 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:54 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 06:52 +0100
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-27 11:22 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8@verizon.net> - 2018-09-25 11:35 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2018-09-25 14:35 -0600
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:50 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:25 -0400
csiph-web