Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #16980
| From | Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: EUFI and LIVE CD/USB issues |
| Date | 2016-03-14 10:41 +0000 |
| Organization | terraraq NNTP server |
| Message-ID | <87poux1gw3.fsf@mantic.terraraq.uk> (permalink) |
| References | <nc2s3k$oe1$1@dont-email.me> <nc4fho$fgg$1@dont-email.me> <nc54f0$sm6$1@dont-email.me> <20160313225410@news.eternal-september.org> <nc5rjl$ksa$1@dont-email.me> |
Arkadiusz Drabczyk <arkadiusz@drabczyk.org> writes: > On 2016-03-14, Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> wrote: >> On 2016-03-14, T <T@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> I think I need to look for "secure boot" and disable it. But,on the >>> last HP $400 pieces of ..., I don't believe there was that option. >> >> Unless it's changed that was supposed to be a required part of the secure >> boot spec for x86. It still is. > I am not sure if this was clarified in the spec but apparently MS has > their own view on that matter. As this > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_10 wikipedia article says: > > "Unlike Windows 8, OEMs are no longer required to make Secure Boot > settings user-configurable, meaning that devices may optionally be > locked to run only Microsoft-signed operating systems." > > They cite this article: > http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/03/windows-10-to-make-the-secure-boot-alt-os-lock-out-a-reality/ That’s a presentation, not a specification, though for some reason it’s popular to cite it instead of the actual specification, which requires, among other things: | On non-ARM systems, the platform MUST implement the ability for a | physically present user to select between two Secure Boot modes in | firmware setup: “Custom” and “Standard”. Custom Mode allows for more | flexibility as specified in the following: | | * It shall be possible for a physically present user to use the Custom | Mode firmware setup option to modify the contents of the Secure Boot | signature databases and the PK. This may be implemented by simply | providing the option to clear all Secure Boot databases (PK, KEK, | db, dbx), which puts the system into setup mode. | | * If the user ends up deleting the PK then, upon exiting the Custom | Mode firmware setup, the system is operating in Setup Mode with | SecureBoot turned off. | | * The firmware setup shall indicate if Secure Boot is turned on, and | if it is operated in Standard or Custom Mode. The firmware setup | must provide an option to return from Custom to Standard Mode which | restores the factory defaults. On an ARM system, it is forbidden to | enable Custom Mode. Only Standard Mode may be enabled. I don’t know UEFI secure boot well, but my understanding is that PK is the trust anchor, making the ability to change or remove it sufficient to boot anything you like. -- http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
EUFI and LIVE CD/USB issues T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-12 21:02 -0800
Re: UEFI and LIVE CD/USB issues Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2016-03-13 11:28 +0100
Re: EUFI and LIVE CD/USB issues Arkadiusz Drabczyk <arkadiusz@drabczyk.org> - 2016-03-13 19:37 +0000
Re: EUFI and LIVE CD/USB issues T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-13 18:37 -0700
Re: EUFI and LIVE CD/USB issues Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-03-14 02:51 +0000
Re: EUFI and LIVE CD/USB issues Arkadiusz Drabczyk <arkadiusz@drabczyk.org> - 2016-03-14 08:09 +0000
Re: EUFI and LIVE CD/USB issues "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@invalid.es> - 2016-03-14 10:29 +0100
Re: EUFI and LIVE CD/USB issues Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2016-03-14 10:41 +0000
Re: EUFI and LIVE CD/USB issues The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-14 10:01 +0000
Re: EUFI and LIVE CD/USB issues dlbendigo <laidlaws@hotkey.net.au> - 2016-03-15 08:42 +1100
csiph-web