Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #90651
| Message-ID | <6a8f6fbe@news.ausics.net> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| From | not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) |
| Subject | Re: Ancient History |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| References | <nf4koiF5rktU44@mid.individual.net> |
| Date | 2026-08-27 08:59 +1000 |
| Organization | Ausics - https://newsgroups.ausics.net |
rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > In my OCD quest to rejuvenate old machines I finally dug out the tower > buried under other junk out in the shed. Turns out it's a Compaq Presario > 4550. It has a 233 MHz AMD K6 that was AMDs challenge to the Pentium II. > It was pin compatible and could be used in a Socket 7 board. It has 48 MB > of RAM (no, that's not a typo) and a 4 GB HDD. For your computing > convenient, it has a 56K modem. There are 2 USB ports although I think it > expects the mouse and keyboard to be plugged into the PS2 ports. Very modern compared to the 120MHz Pentium 1 I'm posting this from, running old Linux. > Two distros that claim to run in 48 MB are Tiny Core and Slax. slax > specifies text only unless you have more RAM. Tiny Core isn't very > specific. For current Tiny Core I don't think their standard boot to RAM method will fit in 48MB anymore, but if you do a manual "HDD install" it will boot with 20MB RAM, and then their default Xvesa TinyX server will probably work in 48MB. > Now for the real puzzle. I was a fairly decent machine in 1997 and came > with Windows 95. Windows 95 claimed a minimum of 4 MB, recommended 8 MB, > and if you had 16 MB or more didn't bother creating a swap file. What the > flaming hell has happened to us? Even by Windows 98 24 MB was > recommended. Now you can barely run a pared down Linux in 48 MB and I > doubt it's a very appealing UX. Some bloat is from the drivers. OpenWRT separately packages a lot of modules for things that are built into the kernel in other distro's kernel builds. Since the total size of the kernel is subtracted from the RAM that's left available for everything else, that allows booting in less RAM. But even the size of that minimum kernel has grown rapidly in recent years such that they no longer officially support routers with 32MB RAM. Otherwise it's software choice. I wonder if the "UX" I choose for all my Linux systems regardless of performance isn't appealing to you since it's largely the same set of software that my Pentium 1 can run. However in some cases where I've had to find alternatives due to incompatibility with modern Linux/libraries maybe the "appealing UX" is why I classed them all as useless? Each to his own... -- __ __ #_ < |\| |< _#
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Ancient History rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-25 04:41 +0000
Re: Ancient History c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-25 03:15 -0400
Re: Ancient History John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-08-25 08:19 -0700
Re: Ancient History The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-25 19:57 +0100
Re: Ancient History c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-26 04:25 -0400
Re: Ancient History The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-26 09:33 +0100
Re: Ancient History rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-26 18:20 +0000
Re: Ancient History The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-26 21:27 +0100
Re: Ancient History rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-27 01:13 +0000
Re: Ancient History c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 03:24 -0400
Re: Ancient History "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-25 11:41 +0200
Re: Ancient History Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-25 11:53 +0100
Re: Ancient History The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-25 12:54 +0100
Re: Ancient History rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-25 19:25 +0000
Re: Ancient History "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-25 14:23 +0200
Re: Ancient History c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-26 03:28 -0400
Re: Ancient History The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-26 09:12 +0100
Re: Ancient History rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-26 18:26 +0000
Re: Ancient History c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 03:56 -0400
Re: Ancient History The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-27 12:00 +0100
Re: Ancient History rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-26 18:23 +0000
Re: Ancient History The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-26 21:29 +0100
Re: Ancient History The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-25 12:31 +0100
Re: Ancient History Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-08-25 07:53 -0400
Re: Ancient History Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-08-25 18:26 +0000
Re: Ancient History rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-25 19:37 +0000
Re: Ancient History rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-25 19:16 +0000
Re: Ancient History The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-25 20:21 +0100
Re: Ancient History rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-26 04:40 +0000
Re: Ancient History The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-25 12:30 +0100
Re: Ancient History c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-26 02:49 -0400
Re: Ancient History "Mr. Chang Man-wai" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-08-25 20:07 +0800
Re: Ancient History Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-08-25 11:20 -0400
Re: Ancient History Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2026-08-25 17:44 +0000
Re: Ancient History Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-25 21:55 +0000
Re: Ancient History not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-08-27 08:59 +1000
Re: Ancient History rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-27 01:20 +0000
Re: Ancient History c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 03:38 -0400
Re: Ancient History vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2026-08-27 08:08 +0000
Re: Ancient History c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 03:21 -0400
csiph-web