Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #5411
| From | Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: PPTP and NAT, IPSec and vpnc to Draytek Vigor |
| Date | 2012-05-24 15:40 +0100 |
| Organization | Roaima. Harrogate, North Yorkshire, UK |
| Message-ID | <1st199x5kt.ln2@news.roaima.co.uk> (permalink) |
| References | <oigg89x2j4.ln2@news.roaima.co.uk> <jp7uct$1t8$1@dont-email.me> <9hov89xkj4.ln2@news.roaima.co.uk> <jplca7$9o4$1@dont-email.me> |
J G Miller <miller@yoyo.org> wrote: > Strongswan is a major piece of software so you will not understand it > all in one day. (I only understand a few small parts of it after > struggling with it for quite a while to understand the configuration > file parameters). Yes, I appreciate that :-) > Remember though that if you have > pcA -----> router1 ======== router2 <------ pcB > then the IPSEC is a tunnel going from pcA to pcB through router1 > and router2. Yes, true. But fortunately my scenario is slightly simpler: pcA -----> router1 =====/===== router2[endpoint] What I'm finding most strange is that the private IP address for pcA on my own LAN is being propagated into the network behind router2. So when I connect to a device that's on router2's LAN it sees the connection coming from my own LAN's private address space. This doesn't feel right: I would have expected pcA to be leased an address from the address space owned/managed by router2. (I think there are options to provide a static IP address but not a dynamic one from a pool. I'll have to do more reading. Later.) Cheers, Chris
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
PPTP and NAT, IPSec and vpnc to Draytek Vigor Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2012-05-18 01:09 +0100
Re: PPTP and NAT, IPSec and vpnc to Draytek Vigor Stan Bischof <stan@worldbadminton.com> - 2012-05-18 13:30 +0000
Re: PPTP and NAT, IPSec and vpnc to Draytek Vigor Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2012-05-19 01:07 +0100
Re: PPTP and NAT, IPSec and vpnc to Draytek Vigor The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-05-19 01:16 +0100
Re: PPTP and NAT, IPSec and vpnc to Draytek Vigor J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2012-05-19 10:58 +0000
Re: PPTP and NAT, IPSec and vpnc to Draytek Vigor Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2012-05-23 19:57 +0100
Re: PPTP and NAT, IPSec and vpnc to Draytek Vigor J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2012-05-24 13:15 +0000
Re: PPTP and NAT, IPSec and vpnc to Draytek Vigor Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2012-05-24 15:40 +0100
Re: PPTP and NAT, IPSec and vpnc to Draytek Vigor J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2012-05-24 15:49 +0000
Re: PPTP and NAT, IPSec and vpnc to Draytek Vigor Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2012-05-24 23:54 +0100
Re: PPTP and NAT, IPSec and vpnc to Draytek Vigor J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2012-05-25 00:10 +0000
Re: PPTP and NAT, IPSec and vpnc to Draytek Vigor Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2012-05-25 08:51 +0100
csiph-web