Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.hardware > #3244
| Path | csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.hardware |
| Subject | Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine |
| Date | Sat, 10 Dec 2016 11:24:36 +0000 |
| Lines | 42 |
| Message-ID | <eb26vlFqh7aU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <earhh4F8si0U1@mid.individual.net> <20161208112716@news.eternal-september.org> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=windows-1252 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net AiPDBz3BzaT9v7Lqb05AqwZKcMOPNa2FP/sSwr11d6ytX92KA= |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:bKYOf1SCoz6q9dkwsg3iqfrQupg= |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <20161208112716@news.eternal-september.org> |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.os.linux.hardware:3244 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 12/08/2016 04:44 PM, Roger Blake wrote: > On 2016-12-07, Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> wrote: >> I'm wondering if there are any cheap / easy speed ups for an IO bound >> machine? >> >> ASUS M4A78 Pro motherboard > > Pretty sure that board only has SATA II (3.0 Gb/sec). You can get an > inexpensive SATA III (6.0 Gb/sec) card for it, something like this: Mobo SATA is SATA II > > http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816124093&cm_re=sata_card-_-16-124-093-_-Product > Is there a reason why you gave that one as an example, chipset, manufacturer or was it simply an inexpensive board with useful specs? Reason I ask is that one is not available in the UK from a quick search and switching the newegg site to UK gives me a message what it can no longer find that product. > (Most likely will improve performance of the SSD the most. The mechanical > drives are probably slow enough that the SATA II port is not a bottleneck.) > I've not noticed a problem with speed with the SSD, more with the data on the WD reds. So as you say SATA II or SATA III unlikely to make a difference with these drives. However, as they are at RAID1 they will both likely to be communicating at the same time. Therefore I wonder whether the SATA chipset might saturate? If so is it worth it getting an add on controller similar to the one you gave as an example so that I can either put the SSD system disk on one and the WD Reds on the other, or split the WD reds across the two controllers? However, if that achieves nothing then I don't need to try. If I can speed up the system SSD that is something that might be worth while, if the price is right, but the mechanical drives appear to be the priority.
Back to comp.os.linux.hardware | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2016-12-07 22:41 +0000
Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-12-08 16:44 +0000
Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2016-12-10 11:24 +0000
Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-12-11 01:34 +0000
Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2016-12-11 22:07 +0000
Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor.this.should.not.be.used@nexgo.REMOVETHIS.de> - 2016-12-10 12:43 +0100
Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2016-12-10 20:44 +0000
Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor.this.should.not.be.used@nexgo.REMOVETHIS.de> - 2016-12-10 23:05 +0100
Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2016-12-11 11:54 +0000
Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor.this.should.not.be.used@nexgo.REMOVETHIS.de> - 2016-12-11 14:10 +0100
Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2016-12-11 22:46 +0000
Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor.this.should.not.be.used@nexgo.REMOVETHIS.de> - 2016-12-12 19:22 +0100
Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-12-13 10:17 +0100
Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2016-12-14 20:03 +0000
Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-12-15 12:55 +0100
Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2016-12-15 23:18 +0000
Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-12-16 09:34 +0100
Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-12-13 09:57 +0100
Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-12-12 09:11 +0100
Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2016-12-12 23:08 +0000
Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-12-13 09:29 +0100
Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2016-12-14 23:16 +0000
Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-12-15 13:15 +0100
Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2016-12-15 22:50 +0000
Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-12-16 09:39 +0100
csiph-web