Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.hardware > #3244

Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine
Date Sat, 10 Dec 2016 11:24:36 +0000
Lines 42
Message-ID <eb26vlFqh7aU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <earhh4F8si0U1@mid.individual.net> <20161208112716@news.eternal-september.org>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace individual.net AiPDBz3BzaT9v7Lqb05AqwZKcMOPNa2FP/sSwr11d6ytX92KA=
Cancel-Lock sha1:bKYOf1SCoz6q9dkwsg3iqfrQupg=
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
In-Reply-To <20161208112716@news.eternal-september.org>
Xref csiph.com comp.os.linux.hardware:3244

Show key headers only | View raw


On 12/08/2016 04:44 PM, Roger Blake wrote:
> On 2016-12-07, Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> wrote:
>> I'm wondering if there are any cheap / easy speed ups for an IO bound
>> machine?
>>
>>   ASUS M4A78 Pro motherboard
> 
> Pretty sure that board only has SATA II (3.0 Gb/sec). You can get an
> inexpensive SATA III (6.0 Gb/sec) card for it, something like this:

Mobo SATA is SATA II

> 
>   http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816124093&cm_re=sata_card-_-16-124-093-_-Product
> 

Is there a reason why you gave that one as an example, chipset,
manufacturer or was it simply an inexpensive board with useful specs?
Reason I ask is that one is not available in the UK from a quick search
and switching the newegg site to UK gives me a message what it can no
longer find that product.

> (Most likely will improve performance of the SSD the most. The mechanical
> drives are probably slow enough that the SATA II port is not a bottleneck.)
> 

I've not noticed a problem with speed with the SSD, more with the data
on the WD reds.  So as you say SATA II or SATA III unlikely to make a
difference with these drives.  However, as they are at RAID1 they will
both likely to be communicating at the same time.  Therefore I wonder
whether the SATA chipset might saturate?  If so is it worth it getting
an add on controller similar to the one you gave as an example so that I
can either put the SSD system disk on one and the WD Reds on the other,
or split the WD reds across the two controllers?  However, if that
achieves nothing then I don't need to try.

If I can speed up the system SSD that is something that might be worth
while, if the price is right, but the mechanical drives appear to be the
priority.


Back to comp.os.linux.hardware | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2016-12-07 22:41 +0000
  Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-12-08 16:44 +0000
    Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2016-12-10 11:24 +0000
      Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-12-11 01:34 +0000
        Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2016-12-11 22:07 +0000
  Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor.this.should.not.be.used@nexgo.REMOVETHIS.de> - 2016-12-10 12:43 +0100
    Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2016-12-10 20:44 +0000
      Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor.this.should.not.be.used@nexgo.REMOVETHIS.de> - 2016-12-10 23:05 +0100
        Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2016-12-11 11:54 +0000
          Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor.this.should.not.be.used@nexgo.REMOVETHIS.de> - 2016-12-11 14:10 +0100
            Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2016-12-11 22:46 +0000
              Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor.this.should.not.be.used@nexgo.REMOVETHIS.de> - 2016-12-12 19:22 +0100
            Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-12-13 10:17 +0100
              Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2016-12-14 20:03 +0000
                Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-12-15 12:55 +0100
                Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2016-12-15 23:18 +0000
                Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-12-16 09:34 +0100
        Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-12-13 09:57 +0100
  Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-12-12 09:11 +0100
    Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2016-12-12 23:08 +0000
      Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-12-13 09:29 +0100
        Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2016-12-14 23:16 +0000
          Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-12-15 13:15 +0100
            Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2016-12-15 22:50 +0000
              Re: Speed ups for a disk IO bound machine David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-12-16 09:39 +0100

csiph-web