Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.embedded > #719
| From | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.linux.embedded, uk.telecom.broadband, uk.politics.misc |
| Subject | Re: Next gen gate keeper modem/routers need improvement for IoT |
| Followup-To | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Date | 2014-11-02 22:58 +0100 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <20141102225816.54a5b4bc@maxa-pc> (permalink) |
| References | <Hmu5w.39527$7w2.27895@fx01.am4> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Followups directed to: comp.os.linux.advocacy
On Sun, 02 Nov 2014 18:04:22 +0000 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> wrote: > Next gen gate keeper modem/routers need improvement for IoT > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > > The idea of ports needs to be replaced with > unique service names that can handle > a 64 bit identifier for unique names. > There are going to tons of new service names for IoT > devices if they are to take off. > There aren't enough ports to handle this kind of traffic. > > The idea of ip address also need to replaced with > unique host names. Port identifies protocol (there aren't that many) and ip address identifies particular host. I see only problem with ipv4 (32bit address), but what's wrong with ipv6 (128bit addresses)? You can't use host/protocol name in ip packet as it is unnecessary bloat... -- Manjaro all the way! http://manjaro.org/
Back to comp.os.linux.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Next gen gate keeper modem/routers need improvement for IoT 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2014-11-02 18:04 +0000
Re: Next gen gate keeper modem/routers need improvement for IoT White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-11-02 19:14 +0000
Re: Next gen gate keeper modem/routers need improvement for IoT 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2014-11-02 19:49 +0000
Re: Next gen gate keeper modem/routers need improvement for IoT flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-02 16:18 -0500
Re: Next gen gate keeper modem/routers need improvement for IoT 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2014-11-02 22:01 +0000
Re: Next gen gate keeper modem/routers need improvement for IoT White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-11-02 22:48 +0000
Re: Next gen gate keeper modem/routers need improvement for IoT Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-02 22:58 +0100
csiph-web