Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #689449 > unrolled thread

Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court 51st State <beyond@hope.com> - 2025-04-25 11:26 +0200
    Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-25 08:58 -0700
      Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court slothe <slothe@netcom.com> - 2025-04-25 17:21 +0000
        Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-04-25 13:44 -0400
          Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-04-25 19:34 +0000
            Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court "P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-04-26 18:03 +0000
            Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-04-26 15:21 -0400
              Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) - 2025-04-26 19:53 +0000
                Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-04-26 16:06 -0400
                  Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) - 2025-04-26 20:14 +0000
                    Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court Tyler Coop <tcoop@uraniumone.com> - 2025-04-26 20:24 +0000
                      Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) - 2025-04-27 01:25 +0000
                        Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> - 2025-04-27 03:54 -0400
                          Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) - 2025-04-27 12:00 +0000
                        Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court Tyler Coop <tcoop@uraniumone.com> - 2025-04-28 03:11 +0000
                    Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-04-26 16:38 -0400
                      Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) - 2025-04-27 01:25 +0000
                        Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-04-27 07:40 -0400
                          Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) - 2025-04-27 12:01 +0000
                            Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> - 2025-04-27 09:51 -0400
                            Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-04-27 14:53 -0400
                              Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> - 2025-04-27 16:04 -0400
                                Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-04-27 16:08 -0400
                                  Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) - 2025-04-27 23:29 +0000
                                  Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> - 2025-04-28 12:33 -0400
                                    Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-04-29 10:31 -0400
                                      Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> - 2025-04-29 13:02 -0400
                                        Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-04-29 13:21 -0400
                                          Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> - 2025-04-29 14:12 -0400
                                            Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-04-29 15:06 -0400
                                Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) - 2025-04-27 23:29 +0000
                                  Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> - 2025-04-28 12:34 -0400
                Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court Tyler Coop <tcoop@uraniumone.com> - 2025-04-26 20:17 +0000
                  Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) - 2025-04-27 01:24 +0000
                    Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court Tyler Coop <tcoop@uraniumone.com> - 2025-04-28 03:03 +0000
                      Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-04-27 23:10 -0400
                        Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court Tyler Coop <tcoop@uraniumone.com> - 2025-04-28 03:18 +0000
                          Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-04-27 23:57 -0400
                      Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) - 2025-04-28 05:19 +0000

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#689557

doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:

>>>>Amendment XIV
>>>>Section 1.
>>>>
>>>>[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
>>>>abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
>>>>United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
>>>>life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
>>>>nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
>>>>protection of the laws.
>>>>
>>>>Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
>>>>liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
>>>
>>>That law has nothing to do with Canadian Politics.
>>
>>I was talking about something other than my sig, you are ignoring
>>that.  So your response has nothing to do with any post in any group
>>in this thread.
>
>Then why bring up US Law in can.politics?


You're the one doing that, bozo, it's a sig that I've had for a long
time, because I am going to overturn the Dobbs Supreme Court decision
with my vast political authority.  It had nothing to do with my reply
in *this thread*, which is crossposted to your Canada group.  If you
want to address what I posted, fine.  If you want to talk about my
sig, fine.  If you want to whine about me having a sig, fuck off.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689560

Joel wrote:
> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
> 
>>>>> Amendment XIV
>>>>> Section 1.
>>>>>
>>>>> [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
>>>>> abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
>>>>> United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
>>>>> life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
>>>>> nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
>>>>> protection of the laws.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
>>>>> liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
>>>>
>>>> That law has nothing to do with Canadian Politics.
>>>
>>> I was talking about something other than my sig, you are ignoring
>>> that.  So your response has nothing to do with any post in any group
>>> in this thread.
>>
>> Then why bring up US Law in can.politics?
> 
> 
> You're the one doing that, bozo, it's a sig that I've had for a long
> time, because I am going to overturn the Dobbs Supreme Court decision
> with my vast political authority.  It had nothing to do with my reply
> in *this thread*, which is crossposted to your Canada group.  If you
> want to address what I posted, fine.  If you want to talk about my
> sig, fine.  If you want to whine about me having a sig, fuck off.
> 
 >
Tell binky how much you enjoy being butt banged, he
enjoys those stories.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689561

Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote:

>Tell binky how much you enjoy being butt banged, he
>enjoys those stories.


I can't take you seriously when you post from Win8.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689564

In article <kk3t0k5vi8ues2b2p3jvtqhpnthv33vbdi@4ax.com>,
Joel  <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>Paedophile Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote:
>
>>Tell binky how much you enjoy being butt banged, he
       ^^^^^<-Peadophile talker Rudy Canoza noted
>>enjoys those stories.
>
>
>I can't take you seriously when you post from Win8.
>
>-- 
>Joel W. Crump
>
>Amendment XIV
>Section 1.
>
>[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
>abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
>United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
>life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
>nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
>protection of the laws.
>
>Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
>liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.


-- 
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Canada -Save the Nation from Donald Trump - Vote Liberal!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689606

Joel wrote:
> Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote:
> 
>> Tell binky how much you enjoy being butt banged, he
>> enjoys those stories.
> 
> 
> I can't take you seriously when you post from Win8.
> 
 >
You proudly take cock up your shitter, and you must be cum drunk, I'm
on Windows 10.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689682

Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote:

>User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
>
>>> Tell binky how much you enjoy being butt banged, he
>>> enjoys those stories.
>> 
>> I can't take you seriously when you post from Win8.
>> 
>You proudly take cock up your shitter, and you must be cum drunk, I'm
>on Windows 10.


Windows NT 6.2 == Windows 8 prior to the 8.1 update.  I don't believe
your claim to post from your Win10 machine, thus.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689694

Joel wrote:
> Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote:
> 
>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
>>
>>>> Tell binky how much you enjoy being butt banged, he
>>>> enjoys those stories.
>>>
>>> I can't take you seriously when you post from Win8.
>>>
>> You proudly take cock up your shitter, and you must be cum drunk, I'm
>> on Windows 10.
> 
> 
> Windows NT 6.2 == Windows 8 prior to the 8.1 update.  I don't believe
> your claim to post from your Win10 machine, thus.
> 
 >
I couldn't care less what a limp wristed sissy like you believes,
clueless pillow biter.

https://postimg.cc/w3rRk4rz

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689695

Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote:

>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
>>>
>>>>> Tell binky how much you enjoy being butt banged, he
>>>>> enjoys those stories.
>>>>
>>>> I can't take you seriously when you post from Win8.
>>>>
>>> You proudly take cock up your shitter, and you must be cum drunk, I'm
>>> on Windows 10.
>> 
>> Windows NT 6.2 == Windows 8 prior to the 8.1 update.  I don't believe
>> your claim to post from your Win10 machine, thus.
>> 
>I couldn't care less what a limp wristed sissy like you believes,
>clueless pillow biter.


I could kick your ass.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689697

Joel wrote:
> Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote:
> 
>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
>>>>
>>>>>> Tell binky how much you enjoy being butt banged, he
>>>>>> enjoys those stories.
>>>>>
>>>>> I can't take you seriously when you post from Win8.
>>>>>
>>>> You proudly take cock up your shitter, and you must be cum drunk, I'm
>>>> on Windows 10.
>>>
>>> Windows NT 6.2 == Windows 8 prior to the 8.1 update.  I don't believe
>>> your claim to post from your Win10 machine, thus.
>>>
>> I couldn't care less what a limp wristed sissy like you believes,
>> clueless pillow biter.
> 
> https://postimg.cc/w3rRk4rz
 >
 >
> I could kick your ass.
> 
 >
You're nothing more than an internet pansy retard.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689700

Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote:

>>>> Windows NT 6.2 == Windows 8 prior to the 8.1 update.  I don't believe
>>>> your claim to post from your Win10 machine, thus.
>>>>
>>> I couldn't care less what a limp wristed sissy like you believes,
>>> clueless pillow biter.
>> 
>> I could kick your ass.
>> 
>You're nothing more than an internet pansy retard.


I drink Icehouse, Guinness Extra Stout and IPAs.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689563

In article <183a45911fcc6f24$101772$5831$66dd6c6a@news.thecubenet.com>,
Paedophile Rudy Canoza  <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote:
>Joel wrote:
>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>> 
>>>>>> Amendment XIV
>>>>>> Section 1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
>>>>>> abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
>>>>>> United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
>>>>>> life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
>>>>>> nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
>>>>>> protection of the laws.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
>>>>>> liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
>>>>>
>>>>> That law has nothing to do with Canadian Politics.
>>>>
>>>> I was talking about something other than my sig, you are ignoring
>>>> that.  So your response has nothing to do with any post in any group
>>>> in this thread.
>>>
>>> Then why bring up US Law in can.politics?
>> 
>> 
>> You're the one doing that, bozo, it's a sig that I've had for a long
>> time, because I am going to overturn the Dobbs Supreme Court decision
>> with my vast political authority.  It had nothing to do with my reply
>> in *this thread*, which is crossposted to your Canada group.  If you
>> want to address what I posted, fine.  If you want to talk about my
>> sig, fine.  If you want to whine about me having a sig, fuck off.
>> 
> >
>Tell binky how much you enjoy being butt banged, he
      ^^^^^<-Peadophile talker Rudy Canoza noted
>enjoys those stories.


-- 
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Canada -Save the Nation from Donald Trump - Vote Liberal!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689607

The Binky Doctor wrote:
> In article <183a45911fcc6f24$101772$5831$66dd6c6a@news.thecubenet.com>,
> Paedophile Rudy Canoza  <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote:
>> Joel wrote:
>>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> Amendment XIV
>>>>>>> Section 1.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
>>>>>>> abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
>>>>>>> United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
>>>>>>> life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
>>>>>>> nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
>>>>>>> protection of the laws.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
>>>>>>> liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That law has nothing to do with Canadian Politics.
>>>>>
>>>>> I was talking about something other than my sig, you are ignoring
>>>>> that.  So your response has nothing to do with any post in any group
>>>>> in this thread.
>>>>
>>>> Then why bring up US Law in can.politics?
>>>
>>>
>>> You're the one doing that, bozo, it's a sig that I've had for a long
>>> time, because I am going to overturn the Dobbs Supreme Court decision
>>> with my vast political authority.  It had nothing to do with my reply
>>> in *this thread*, which is crossposted to your Canada group.  If you
>>> want to address what I posted, fine.  If you want to talk about my
>>> sig, fine.  If you want to whine about me having a sig, fuck off.
>>>
>>>
>> Tell binky how much you enjoy being butt banged, he
>        ^^^^^<-Peadophile talker Rudy Canoza noted
>> enjoys those stories.
> 
> 
 >
Binky erroneously calls everyone a pedo because of what his pappy did
to him.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689506

On 26 Apr 2025, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted some
news:vujdk3$1afr$14@gallifrey.nk.ca: 

> In article <8fcq0k5c7bs7uvje0fnqqrpfud9ba079ag@4ax.com>,
> Joel  <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>On 2025-04-25, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> slothe <slothe@netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>On 25 Apr 2025, a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> posted some
>>>>>news:qiOOP.2639593$OrR5.2009332@fx18.iad: 
>>>>
>>>>>> Simply amazing!
>>>>>> I want it all!
>>>>>> I want it both ways!
>>>>>> And I want all of you to pay for it!
>>>>>> ---------- Court - OK, sounds fine to us.
>>>>>
>>>>>That's ridiculous.  
>>>>
>>>> They may have accidentally done the right thing.  This particular
>>>> surgery is just fucking insane but it seems to be the wish of the
>>>> person acquiring it - I could never advise anyone to modify their
>>>> genitals but if they choose that they choose with free will to
>>>> pretend that God screwed up and it requires a knife to the balls.
>>>
>>>Looks like the insult "go fu%k yourself" has taken on a whole new
>>>meaning. 
>>>
>>>ROTFLMAO! 
>>
>>
>>They would need a partner, not being able to use the penis to
>>penetrate their own makeshift vagina.  I say if a person is delusional
>>enough to think they're bigender and should literally have surgery to
>>have both parts, let them.
>>
>>-- 
>>Joel W. Crump
>>
>>Amendment XIV
>>Section 1.
>>
>>[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
>>abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
>>United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
>>life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
>>nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
>>protection of the laws.
>>
>>Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
>>liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
> 
> What does this have to do with Canadian Politics?

Ontario isn't part of Canada?  Let's nuke that LGBTIQA+ dump!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689514

In article <205053037b.1745698653@ydhzu.uq>,
Tyler Coop  <tcoop@uraniumone.com> wrote:
>On 26 Apr 2025, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted some
>news:vujdk3$1afr$14@gallifrey.nk.ca: 
>
>> In article <8fcq0k5c7bs7uvje0fnqqrpfud9ba079ag@4ax.com>,
>> Joel  <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>>On 2025-04-25, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> slothe <slothe@netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>On 25 Apr 2025, a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> posted some
>>>>>>news:qiOOP.2639593$OrR5.2009332@fx18.iad: 
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Simply amazing!
>>>>>>> I want it all!
>>>>>>> I want it both ways!
>>>>>>> And I want all of you to pay for it!
>>>>>>> ---------- Court - OK, sounds fine to us.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>That's ridiculous.  
>>>>>
>>>>> They may have accidentally done the right thing.  This particular
>>>>> surgery is just fucking insane but it seems to be the wish of the
>>>>> person acquiring it - I could never advise anyone to modify their
>>>>> genitals but if they choose that they choose with free will to
>>>>> pretend that God screwed up and it requires a knife to the balls.
>>>>
>>>>Looks like the insult "go fu%k yourself" has taken on a whole new
>>>>meaning. 
>>>>
>>>>ROTFLMAO! 
>>>
>>>
>>>They would need a partner, not being able to use the penis to
>>>penetrate their own makeshift vagina.  I say if a person is delusional
>>>enough to think they're bigender and should literally have surgery to
>>>have both parts, let them.
>>>
>>>-- 
>>>Joel W. Crump
>>>
>>>Amendment XIV
>>>Section 1.
>>>
>>>[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
>>>abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
>>>United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
>>>life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
>>>nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
>>>protection of the laws.
>>>
>>>Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
>>>liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
>> 
>> What does this have to do with Canadian Politics?
>
>Ontario isn't part of Canada?  Let's nuke that LGBTIQA+ dump!
>

Yes, but the about Amendment is US Law.
-- 
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Canada -Save the Nation from Donald Trump - Vote Liberal!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689569

On 26 Apr 2025, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted some
news:vuk101$e9u$8@gallifrey.nk.ca: 

> In article <205053037b.1745698653@ydhzu.uq>,
> Tyler Coop  <tcoop@uraniumone.com> wrote:
>>On 26 Apr 2025, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted some
>>news:vujdk3$1afr$14@gallifrey.nk.ca: 
>>
>>> In article <8fcq0k5c7bs7uvje0fnqqrpfud9ba079ag@4ax.com>,
>>> Joel  <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>>>On 2025-04-25, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> slothe <slothe@netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>On 25 Apr 2025, a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> posted some
>>>>>>>news:qiOOP.2639593$OrR5.2009332@fx18.iad: 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Simply amazing!
>>>>>>>> I want it all!
>>>>>>>> I want it both ways!
>>>>>>>> And I want all of you to pay for it!
>>>>>>>> ---------- Court - OK, sounds fine to us.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>That's ridiculous.  
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They may have accidentally done the right thing.  This particular
>>>>>> surgery is just fucking insane but it seems to be the wish of the
>>>>>> person acquiring it - I could never advise anyone to modify their
>>>>>> genitals but if they choose that they choose with free will to
>>>>>> pretend that God screwed up and it requires a knife to the balls.
>>>>>
>>>>>Looks like the insult "go fu%k yourself" has taken on a whole new
>>>>>meaning. 
>>>>>
>>>>>ROTFLMAO! 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>They would need a partner, not being able to use the penis to
>>>>penetrate their own makeshift vagina.  I say if a person is
>>>>delusional enough to think they're bigender and should literally
>>>>have surgery to have both parts, let them.
>>>>
>>>>-- 
>>>>Joel W. Crump
>>>>
>>>>Amendment XIV
>>>>Section 1.
>>>>
>>>>[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
>>>>abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
>>>>United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
>>>>life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
>>>>nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
>>>>protection of the laws.
>>>>
>>>>Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
>>>>liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
>>> 
>>> What does this have to do with Canadian Politics?
>>
>>Ontario isn't part of Canada?  Let's nuke that LGBTIQA+ dump!
>>
> 
> Yes, but the about Amendment is US Law.

Yes it is and it was finally corrected so the responsibility rests with
the states where it should have been all along. 

Now, why doesn't Canada provide the roto-rooter but leave the penis
procedure?  Why do they have to go to the US state of steers and queers?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689570

Tyler Coop <tcoop@uraniumone.com> wrote:
>On 26 Apr 2025, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted some
>news:vuk101$e9u$8@gallifrey.nk.ca: 
>> In article <205053037b.1745698653@ydhzu.uq>,
>> Tyler Coop  <tcoop@uraniumone.com> wrote:
>>>On 26 Apr 2025, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted some
>>>news:vujdk3$1afr$14@gallifrey.nk.ca: 
>>>> In article <8fcq0k5c7bs7uvje0fnqqrpfud9ba079ag@4ax.com>,
>>>> Joel  <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>Amendment XIV
>>>>>Section 1.
>>>>>
>>>>>[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
>>>>>abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
>>>>>United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
>>>>>life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
>>>>>nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
>>>>>protection of the laws.
>>>>>
>>>>>Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
>>>>>liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
>>>> 
>>>> What does this have to do with Canadian Politics?
>>>
>>>Ontario isn't part of Canada?  Let's nuke that LGBTIQA+ dump!
>> 
>> Yes, but the about Amendment is US Law.
>
>Yes it is and it was finally corrected so the responsibility rests with
>the states where it should have been all along. 


Incorrect, moron, look at my quote of the 14th amendment, it's right
there in the quoting.  This is a federal constitutional right for
women and people assigned female at birth, pro-life is anti-female.
Alito has a view of law that cannot be defended but yet it is by
Thomas and Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett.  And so many sadistic
misogynists out there.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689572

On 27 Apr 2025, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> posted some news:r4st0kps5trcqjsthlnibmc81kg80u7cta@4ax.com:

> Tyler Coop <tcoop@uraniumone.com> wrote:
>>On 26 Apr 2025, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted some
>>news:vuk101$e9u$8@gallifrey.nk.ca: 
>>> In article <205053037b.1745698653@ydhzu.uq>,
>>> Tyler Coop  <tcoop@uraniumone.com> wrote:
>>>>On 26 Apr 2025, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted some
>>>>news:vujdk3$1afr$14@gallifrey.nk.ca: 
>>>>> In article <8fcq0k5c7bs7uvje0fnqqrpfud9ba079ag@4ax.com>,
>>>>> Joel  <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Amendment XIV
>>>>>>Section 1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
>>>>>>abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
>>>>>>United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
>>>>>>life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
>>>>>>nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
>>>>>>protection of the laws.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
>>>>>>liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
>>>>> 
>>>>> What does this have to do with Canadian Politics?
>>>>
>>>>Ontario isn't part of Canada?  Let's nuke that LGBTIQA+ dump!
>>> 
>>> Yes, but the about Amendment is US Law.
>>
>>Yes it is and it was finally corrected so the responsibility rests with
>>the states where it should have been all along. 
> 
> 
> Incorrect, moron, look at my quote of the 14th amendment, it's right
> there in the quoting.  This is a federal constitutional right for
> women and people assigned female at birth, pro-life is anti-female.

Who's the moron?  "women and people assigned female at birth" doesn't 
happen, it's recorded.  

> Alito has a view of law that cannot be defended but yet it is by
> Thomas and Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett.  And so many sadistic
> misogynists out there.

Trump says there is no more transgender silliness, and if Canada had
any backbone or brains, they would too.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689574

Tyler Coop <tcoop@uraniumone.com> wrote:

>>>> [the 14th] Amendment is US Law.
>>>
>>>Yes it is and it was finally corrected so the responsibility rests with
>>>the states where it should have been all along. 
>> 
>> Incorrect, moron, look at my quote of the 14th amendment, it's right
>> there in the quoting.  This is a federal constitutional right for
>> women and people assigned female at birth, pro-life is anti-female.
>
>Who's the moron?  "women and people assigned female at birth" doesn't 
>happen, it's recorded.  


Do you see in my quote of the amendment anything that would permit a
state to enact an antiabortion law?


>> Alito has a view of law that cannot be defended but yet it is by
>> Thomas and Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett.  And so many sadistic
>> misogynists out there.
>
>Trump says there is no more transgender silliness, and if Canada had
>any backbone or brains, they would too.


Trump can kiss my ass, he's not the final judge of "transgender
silliness", you backward old codger.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#689575

In article <f014f6dd2a.1745809434@mhdxg.ah>,
Tyler Coop  <tcoop@uraniumone.com> wrote:
>On 26 Apr 2025, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted some
>news:vuk101$e9u$8@gallifrey.nk.ca: 
>
>> In article <205053037b.1745698653@ydhzu.uq>,
>> Tyler Coop  <tcoop@uraniumone.com> wrote:
>>>On 26 Apr 2025, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted some
>>>news:vujdk3$1afr$14@gallifrey.nk.ca: 
>>>
>>>> In article <8fcq0k5c7bs7uvje0fnqqrpfud9ba079ag@4ax.com>,
>>>> Joel  <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>>>>On 2025-04-25, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> slothe <slothe@netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>On 25 Apr 2025, a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> posted some
>>>>>>>>news:qiOOP.2639593$OrR5.2009332@fx18.iad: 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Simply amazing!
>>>>>>>>> I want it all!
>>>>>>>>> I want it both ways!
>>>>>>>>> And I want all of you to pay for it!
>>>>>>>>> ---------- Court - OK, sounds fine to us.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>That's ridiculous.  
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They may have accidentally done the right thing.  This particular
>>>>>>> surgery is just fucking insane but it seems to be the wish of the
>>>>>>> person acquiring it - I could never advise anyone to modify their
>>>>>>> genitals but if they choose that they choose with free will to
>>>>>>> pretend that God screwed up and it requires a knife to the balls.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Looks like the insult "go fu%k yourself" has taken on a whole new
>>>>>>meaning. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>ROTFLMAO! 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>They would need a partner, not being able to use the penis to
>>>>>penetrate their own makeshift vagina.  I say if a person is
>>>>>delusional enough to think they're bigender and should literally
>>>>>have surgery to have both parts, let them.
>>>>>
>>>>>-- 
>>>>>Joel W. Crump
>>>>>
>>>>>Amendment XIV
>>>>>Section 1.
>>>>>
>>>>>[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
>>>>>abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
>>>>>United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
>>>>>life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
>>>>>nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
>>>>>protection of the laws.
>>>>>
>>>>>Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
>>>>>liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
>>>> 
>>>> What does this have to do with Canadian Politics?
>>>
>>>Ontario isn't part of Canada?  Let's nuke that LGBTIQA+ dump!
>>>
>> 
>> Yes, but the about Amendment is US Law.
>
>Yes it is and it was finally corrected so the responsibility rests with
>the states where it should have been all along. 
>
>Now, why doesn't Canada provide the roto-rooter but leave the penis
>procedure?  Why do they have to go to the US state of steers and queers?
>

They don't!  WE have our own legal system.
-- 
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Canada -Save the Nation from Donald Trump - Vote Liberal!

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web