Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #688211 > unrolled thread

NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> - 2025-03-26 20:41 -0400
    Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-03-27 00:56 +0000
      Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-03-28 11:02 -0400
        Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-03-29 12:03 +0000
          Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-29 11:34 -0700
            Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-03-29 21:56 +0000
              Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-29 18:05 -0400
              Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-29 21:16 -0700
          Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-03-29 18:08 -0400
            Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-03-29 22:29 +0000
              Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-29 18:36 -0400
                Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Skeeter <none@none.com> - 2025-03-29 16:45 -0600
                  Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-29 18:48 -0400
                    Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Skeeter <none@none.com> - 2025-03-29 17:49 -0600
                  Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-03-29 23:06 +0000
                    Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-29 19:08 -0400
                      Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-03-29 23:25 +0000
                        Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-29 19:42 -0400
                          Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Skeeter <none@none.com> - 2025-03-29 17:50 -0600
                            Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-03-29 23:55 +0000
                Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-03-30 01:35 +0000
                  Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-29 21:38 -0400
                    Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-03-30 01:41 +0000
                      Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-03-30 02:39 -0400
                        Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-03-30 06:56 -0400
                          Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-03-30 11:19 +0000
                            Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-30 11:08 -0700
                              Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-03-30 19:09 +0000
                                Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-30 15:20 -0400
                                  Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-03-30 19:46 +0000
                                    Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-30 16:03 -0400
                                      Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-03-30 20:30 +0000
                                      Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Skeeter <none@none.com> - 2025-03-30 14:41 -0600
                                    Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-03-31 01:38 -0400
                                  Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Skeeter <none@none.com> - 2025-03-30 14:05 -0600
                                Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-30 14:35 -0700
                                  Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-03-30 22:04 +0000
                                    Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-30 17:00 -0700
                                      Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop onion@anon.invalid (Mr Ön!on) - 2025-03-31 01:08 +0100
                                        Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-30 20:13 -0400
                                      Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-03-31 00:12 +0000
                                    Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-03-31 01:39 -0400
                                      Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-03-31 02:16 -0400
                                        Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-03-31 08:55 +0000
                                          Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-03-31 09:10 -0400
                                        Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-31 06:48 -0700
                            Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-03-31 01:37 -0400
                            Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop "P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-31 23:53 +0000
                          Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-03-30 07:34 -0400
                            Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-03-31 00:41 +0000
                      Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-30 13:57 -0400
                    Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-03-30 02:25 +0000
                      Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-30 14:46 -0400
                        Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Rudy Canoza <rc@jolly.invalid> - 2025-03-30 14:55 -0400
                        Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Skeeter <none@none.com> - 2025-03-30 14:04 -0600
                          Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-03-31 01:14 +0000
                            Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop "P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-31 23:53 +0000
                              Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-31 19:57 -0400
                                Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-04-01 00:14 +0000
                              Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-01 00:34 -0400
                                Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Skeeter <none@none.com> - 2025-04-01 05:42 -0600
                      Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-03-30 16:31 -0400
                        Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Skeeter <none@none.com> - 2025-03-30 14:42 -0600
                        Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-08 23:30 -0400
                    Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Skeeter <none@none.com> - 2025-03-30 06:54 -0600
              Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-03-30 11:27 -0400

Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4  Next page →

#688407

On 2025-03-29, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>On 2025-03-29, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Do you even know how many pennies of your tax dollars pay for PBS?
>>
>>If it's even a single 1/100000th of a cent it's too much.
>>I want zero of my tax dollars going to that garbage.
>
>
> Just stop, crazy person, it's not "garbage", it's just something that
> challenges your boneheaded, idiotic outlook.  Grow a brain, and cope
> with the fact that the Corporation for Public Broadcasting is about
> giving a foundation to independent public media, do you want the
> networks to control the airwaves entirely, you fucking dumbfuck?
>
> Get with it.
>

PBS sucks... haven't tuned in for years.
They fundraise every three weeks, mostly shit programming... self help
gurus, cooking nonsense, travel scam shows, left wing news.
Some shows try to tempt one into buying the show available on DVD.
Seems to be mostly programs that need government funding, because the
viewers find nothing of value.

The only good shows they ever had on were Masterpiece, Nova(older ones).
I get that type of programming by subscribing to Britbox, Acorn TV.
160 bucks a year, watch entire series when I want without a single
interruption.

If PBS were any good, I'd pay for it, but it's "garbage".
Stop sending taxpayer money to keep crap on air.

-- 
End Transmission

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#688408

Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> wrote:
>On 2025-03-29, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>On 2025-03-29, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Do you even know how many pennies of your tax dollars pay for PBS?
>>>
>>>If it's even a single 1/100000th of a cent it's too much.
>>>I want zero of my tax dollars going to that garbage.
>>
>> Just stop, crazy person, it's not "garbage", it's just something that
>> challenges your boneheaded, idiotic outlook.  Grow a brain, and cope
>> with the fact that the Corporation for Public Broadcasting is about
>> giving a foundation to independent public media, do you want the
>> networks to control the airwaves entirely, you fucking dumbfuck?
>>
>> Get with it.
>
>PBS sucks... haven't tuned in for years.
>They fundraise every three weeks, mostly shit programming... self help
>gurus, cooking nonsense, travel scam shows, left wing news.
>Some shows try to tempt one into buying the show available on DVD.
>Seems to be mostly programs that need government funding, because the
>viewers find nothing of value.
>
>The only good shows they ever had on were Masterpiece, Nova(older ones).
>I get that type of programming by subscribing to Britbox, Acorn TV.
>160 bucks a year, watch entire series when I want without a single
>interruption.
>
>If PBS were any good, I'd pay for it, but it's "garbage".
>Stop sending taxpayer money to keep crap on air.


Ignorant.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#688409

On 2025-03-30, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> wrote:
>>On 2025-03-29, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>>On 2025-03-29, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you even know how many pennies of your tax dollars pay for PBS?
>>>>
>>>>If it's even a single 1/100000th of a cent it's too much.
>>>>I want zero of my tax dollars going to that garbage.
>>>
>>> Just stop, crazy person, it's not "garbage", it's just something that
>>> challenges your boneheaded, idiotic outlook.  Grow a brain, and cope
>>> with the fact that the Corporation for Public Broadcasting is about
>>> giving a foundation to independent public media, do you want the
>>> networks to control the airwaves entirely, you fucking dumbfuck?
>>>
>>> Get with it.
>>
>>PBS sucks... haven't tuned in for years.
>>They fundraise every three weeks, mostly shit programming... self help
>>gurus, cooking nonsense, travel scam shows, left wing news.
>>Some shows try to tempt one into buying the show available on DVD.
>>Seems to be mostly programs that need government funding, because the
>>viewers find nothing of value.
>>
>>The only good shows they ever had on were Masterpiece, Nova(older ones).
>>I get that type of programming by subscribing to Britbox, Acorn TV.
>>160 bucks a year, watch entire series when I want without a single
>>interruption.
>>
>>If PBS were any good, I'd pay for it, but it's "garbage".
>>Stop sending taxpayer money to keep crap on air.
>
>
> Ignorant.
>

How much do you send to PBS during their long running fundraisers?

-- 
End Transmission

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#688422

On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 01:41:05 -0000 (UTC), Adison Vohn Caterson
<Adison@Caterson.invalid> wrote:

>On 2025-03-30, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> wrote:
>>>On 2025-03-29, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>>>On 2025-03-29, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you even know how many pennies of your tax dollars pay for PBS?
>>>>>
>>>>>If it's even a single 1/100000th of a cent it's too much.
>>>>>I want zero of my tax dollars going to that garbage.
>>>>
>>>> Just stop, crazy person, it's not "garbage", it's just something that
>>>> challenges your boneheaded, idiotic outlook.  Grow a brain, and cope
>>>> with the fact that the Corporation for Public Broadcasting is about
>>>> giving a foundation to independent public media, do you want the
>>>> networks to control the airwaves entirely, you fucking dumbfuck?
>>>>
>>>> Get with it.
>>>
>>>PBS sucks... haven't tuned in for years.
>>>They fundraise every three weeks, mostly shit programming... self help
>>>gurus, cooking nonsense, travel scam shows, left wing news.
>>>Some shows try to tempt one into buying the show available on DVD.
>>>Seems to be mostly programs that need government funding, because the
>>>viewers find nothing of value.
>>>
>>>The only good shows they ever had on were Masterpiece, Nova(older ones).
>>>I get that type of programming by subscribing to Britbox, Acorn TV.
>>>160 bucks a year, watch entire series when I want without a single
>>>interruption.
>>>
>>>If PBS were any good, I'd pay for it, but it's "garbage".
>>>Stop sending taxpayer money to keep crap on air.
>>
>>
>> Ignorant.
>>
>
>How much do you send to PBS during their long running fundraisers?

Nothing.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#688427

Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

> On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 01:41:05 -0000 (UTC), Adison Vohn Caterson
> <Adison@Caterson.invalid> wrote:
>
>>>> <shitsnip>
>>>>
>>>>If PBS were any good, I'd pay for it, but it's "garbage".
>>>>Stop sending taxpayer money to keep crap on air.
>>>
>>> Ignorant.
>>
>>How much do you send to PBS during their long running fundraisers?
>
> Nothing.

PBS has a nice app you can run on Roku or Google TV to view
good programs at your leisure.

The PBS Newshour is fairly even-handed, and can go more in depth than
the evening news of the main teevee channels.

I remember, growing up in rural Illinois outside of Chicago, watching
a lot of channel 11, WTTW ("Window to the World"). Interesting shows you'd
never see on the other channels. I particularly remember "Soundstage",
which introduced me to the fusion group Return to Forever and to Gil
Scott-Heron.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTB_GDmFbGk

    Gil Scott-Heron - H2Ogate Blues

-- 
Love is always open arms.  With arms open you allow love to come and
go as it wills, freely, for it will do so anyway.  If you close your
arms about love you'll find you are left only holding yourself.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#688431

On 2025-03-30, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
> Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
>
>> On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 01:41:05 -0000 (UTC), Adison Vohn Caterson
>> <Adison@Caterson.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>>> <shitsnip>
>>>>>
>>>>>If PBS were any good, I'd pay for it, but it's "garbage".
>>>>>Stop sending taxpayer money to keep crap on air.
>>>>
>>>> Ignorant.
>>>
>>>How much do you send to PBS during their long running fundraisers?
>>
>> Nothing.
>
> PBS has a nice app you can run on Roku or Google TV to view
> good programs at your leisure.

If you are a subscriber.
Otherwise shows are taken off, unavailable rather quickly.
But, the last I used the app was when the newest "Sherlock" was on.
That show became unavailable rather quickly, stll can watch it on
Britbox.

>
> The PBS Newshour is fairly even-handed, and can go more in depth than
> the evening news of the main teevee channels.

Even handed with the right hand bandaged over, held behind the back.

> I remember, growing up in rural Illinois outside of Chicago, watching
> a lot of channel 11, WTTW ("Window to the World"). Interesting shows you'd
> never see on the other channels. I particularly remember "Soundstage",
> which introduced me to the fusion group Return to Forever and to Gil
> Scott-Heron.
>
>     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTB_GDmFbGk
>
>     Gil Scott-Heron - H2Ogate Blues
>

Never liked music TV, the bluegrass in a cave was the worst. ;)
If you like it, you should support it with money, then it can live on in
your house.

-- 
End Transmission

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#688457

On 30/3/25 4:19, Adison Vohn Caterson wrote:
>> The PBS Newshour is fairly even-handed, and can go more in depth than
>> >the evening news of the main teevee channels.
> Even handed with the right hand bandaged over, held behind the back.
>

For example?

Do not blame them that reality has a liberal bias.

-- 
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied.  @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'                    /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0        / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#688460

On 2025-03-30, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On 30/3/25 4:19, Adison Vohn Caterson wrote:
>>> The PBS Newshour is fairly even-handed, and can go more in depth than
>>> >the evening news of the main teevee channels.
>> Even handed with the right hand bandaged over, held behind the back.
>>
>
> For example?

https://www.allsides.com/news-source/pbs-newshour

> Do not blame them that reality has a liberal bias.

They "cater" to a liberal audience, obviously.
But, the fix was easy... delete PBS channels from my TV.

-- 
End Transmission

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#688461

Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> wrote:
>On 2025-03-30, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On 30/3/25 4:19, Adison Vohn Caterson wrote:

>>>> The PBS Newshour is fairly even-handed, and can go more in depth than
>>>> >the evening news of the main teevee channels.
>>> Even handed with the right hand bandaged over, held behind the back.
>>
>> For example?
>
>https://www.allsides.com/news-source/pbs-newshour
>
>> Do not blame them that reality has a liberal bias.
>
>They "cater" to a liberal audience, obviously.
>But, the fix was easy... delete PBS channels from my TV.


You just admitted that a "conservative" audience is less intelligent,
on the whole.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#688462

On 2025-03-30, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> wrote:
>>On 2025-03-30, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> On 30/3/25 4:19, Adison Vohn Caterson wrote:
>
>>>>> The PBS Newshour is fairly even-handed, and can go more in depth than
>>>>> >the evening news of the main teevee channels.
>>>> Even handed with the right hand bandaged over, held behind the back.
>>>
>>> For example?
>>
>>https://www.allsides.com/news-source/pbs-newshour
>>
>>> Do not blame them that reality has a liberal bias.
>>
>>They "cater" to a liberal audience, obviously.
>>But, the fix was easy... delete PBS channels from my TV.
>
>
> You just admitted that a "conservative" audience is less intelligent,
> on the whole.

How so?
I don't watch it because I'm not interested in it's views, so I removed
it. I remove other channels I don't watch. Sounds pretty fuckin
intelligent to me.

I also don't watch golf, basketball, wrestling, reality Tv, dogs licking
themselves, traffic accidents, tampon commercials, etc...

-- 
End Transmission

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#688463

Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> wrote:

>>>They [PBS] "cater" to a liberal audience, obviously.
>>>But, the fix was easy... delete PBS channels from my TV.
>>
>> You just admitted that a "conservative" audience is less intelligent,
>> on the whole.
>
>How so?
>I don't watch it because I'm not interested in it's views, so I removed
>it. I remove other channels I don't watch. Sounds pretty fuckin
>intelligent to me.
>
>I also don't watch golf, basketball, wrestling, reality Tv, dogs licking
>themselves, traffic accidents, tampon commercials, etc...


This is the thing - I find PBS NewsHour and such kind of tedious,
myself, at times, but that's because they're presenting things in an
intellectual manner, they don't have the flashy BS of the networks.
Public broadcasting *isn't* really biased, it just happens to be
accepted more among the left, the right wants crap like FNC.  But it'd
be a mistake to think there aren't people on the right who are the
exception, and are more intelligent/rational, who do look at PBS/NPR/
BBC, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting does a service for all of
us, truly.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#688467

On 2025-03-30, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> wrote:
>
>>>>They [PBS] "cater" to a liberal audience, obviously.
>>>>But, the fix was easy... delete PBS channels from my TV.
>>>
>>> You just admitted that a "conservative" audience is less intelligent,
>>> on the whole.
>>
>>How so?
>>I don't watch it because I'm not interested in it's views, so I removed
>>it. I remove other channels I don't watch. Sounds pretty fuckin
>>intelligent to me.
>>
>>I also don't watch golf, basketball, wrestling, reality Tv, dogs licking
>>themselves, traffic accidents, tampon commercials, etc...
>
>
> This is the thing - I find PBS NewsHour and such kind of tedious,
> myself, at times, but that's because they're presenting things in an
> intellectual manner, they don't have the flashy BS of the networks.

I don't really watch network news. If I'm interested in finding out
something, I just read a few search results, and come to my own
conclusion.

> Public broadcasting *isn't* really biased, it just happens to be
> accepted more among the left, the right wants crap like FNC.  But it'd
> be a mistake to think there aren't people on the right who are the
> exception, and are more intelligent/rational, who do look at PBS/NPR/
> BBC, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting does a service for all of
> us, truly.

I'm not quite sure how you associate PBS news viewership with
intelligence.

It's like thinking all intelligent people play chess.

I do watch BBC News at times, no rationalization needed.
Flip past it, stop channel button pressing, watch ;)

-- 
End Transmission

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#688469

In article <9l8jujhjpbgeje4js8phrpp6hojumuen1f@4ax.com>, 
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> 
> Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> wrote:
> 
> >>>They [PBS] "cater" to a liberal audience, obviously.
> >>>But, the fix was easy... delete PBS channels from my TV.
> >>
> >> You just admitted that a "conservative" audience is less intelligent,
> >> on the whole.
> >
> >How so?
> >I don't watch it because I'm not interested in it's views, so I removed
> >it. I remove other channels I don't watch. Sounds pretty fuckin
> >intelligent to me.
> >
> >I also don't watch golf, basketball, wrestling, reality Tv, dogs licking
> >themselves, traffic accidents, tampon commercials, etc...
> 
> 
> This is the thing - I find PBS NewsHour and such kind of tedious,
> myself, at times, but that's because they're presenting things in an
> intellectual manner, they don't have the flashy BS of the networks.
> Public broadcasting *isn't* really biased, it just happens to be
> accepted more among the left, the right wants crap like FNC.  But it'd
> be a mistake to think there aren't people on the right who are the
> exception, and are more intelligent/rational, who do look at PBS/NPR/
> BBC, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting does a service for all of
> us, truly.

PBS is biased and payed for. No more tax money for them.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#688490

On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 19:46:13 -0000 (UTC), Adison Vohn Caterson
<Adison@Caterson.invalid> wrote:

>I don't watch it because I'm not interested in it's views,

I'm interested in its facts.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#688465

In article <1b6jujhsqols6c036nd0sb1ttmriq6dtsd@4ax.com>, 
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> 
> Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> wrote:
> >On 2025-03-30, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> On 30/3/25 4:19, Adison Vohn Caterson wrote:
> 
> >>>> The PBS Newshour is fairly even-handed, and can go more in depth than
> >>>> >the evening news of the main teevee channels.
> >>> Even handed with the right hand bandaged over, held behind the back.
> >>
> >> For example?
> >
> >https://www.allsides.com/news-source/pbs-newshour
> >
> >> Do not blame them that reality has a liberal bias.
> >
> >They "cater" to a liberal audience, obviously.
> >But, the fix was easy... delete PBS channels from my TV.
> 
> 
> You just admitted that a "conservative" audience is less intelligent,
> on the whole.

Typical liberal spinning shit around. He never said that. 
Stop being stupid.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#688472

On 30/3/25 12:09, Adison Vohn Caterson wrote:
> They "cater" to a liberal audience, obviously.
> But, the fix was easy... delete PBS channels from my TV.

They cater to subscribers.

Do you subscribe?

Are you angry when commercial television news kills content to 
kiss the politically addled butts of advertisers?

-- 
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied.  @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'                    /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0        / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#688475

On 2025-03-30, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On 30/3/25 12:09, Adison Vohn Caterson wrote:
>> They "cater" to a liberal audience, obviously.
>> But, the fix was easy... delete PBS channels from my TV.
>
> They cater to subscribers.

One third of which don't possibly realise they are subscribing.

> Do you subscribe?

A bit, but not willingly.

> Are you angry when commercial television news kills content to 
> kiss the politically addled butts of advertisers?

I wouldn't know, so no, not angry.
I don't watch network news.
Even local news... watch the weather, change the channel.

Advertising doesn't work on me.
I know when I want something, don't need prompting ;)
I've seen Subaru commercials, never an urge to get one.

-- 
End Transmission

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#688479

On 30/3/25 15:04, Adison Vohn Caterson wrote:
> I wouldn't know, so no, not angry.
> I don't watch network news.
> Even local news... watch the weather, change the channel.

Everything you know you learned from Facebook 'researchers'.

-- 
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied.  @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'                    /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0        / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#688480

[tpg & miu dropped]

Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On 30/3/25 15:04, Adison Vohn Caterson wrote:
> > I wouldn't know, so no, not angry.
> > I don't watch network news.
> > Even local news... watch the weather, change the channel.
> 
> Everything you know you learned from Facebook 'researchers'.

Farcebook?  Does anybody still use that Zuckerthing?  Ew...

-- 
  \|/  
(((Ï)))  -  Mr Ön!on 
 
When we shake the ketchup bottle 
At first none comes and then a lot'll.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#688482

onion@anon.invalid (Mr Ön!on) wrote:

>User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.8.6b1 (ed136d9b90) (Mac OS 10.13.6)
>
>Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On 30/3/25 15:04, Adison Vohn Caterson wrote:

>> > I wouldn't know, so no, not angry.
>> > I don't watch network news.
>> > Even local news... watch the weather, change the channel.
>> 
>> Everything you know you learned from Facebook 'researchers'.
>
>Farcebook?  Does anybody still use that Zuckerthing?  Ew...


Says a guy using a Mac, heh.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web