Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #683622 > unrolled thread
| Started by | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-01-10 12:37 -0500 |
| Last post | 2025-01-16 11:35 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 186 — 27 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-10 12:37 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-10 12:43 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-10 13:59 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 09:30 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-11 07:30 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-20 16:39 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-20 20:39 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-21 06:05 -0600
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-21 08:49 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-10 20:14 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-10 16:35 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 09:31 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-01-11 12:15 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-12 23:20 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-13 12:45 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-13 22:50 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-21 22:43 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 12:54 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 09:27 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 04:32 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-11 07:38 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-11 07:28 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-12 08:38 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-12 09:36 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-13 12:40 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-13 10:05 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-11 20:11 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-11 17:28 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-12 08:40 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-12 09:55 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-13 12:44 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-12 08:39 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-12 23:23 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs MikeS <MikeS@fred.com> - 2025-01-13 21:25 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-13 16:32 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-13 17:44 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-13 17:54 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-13 18:10 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-13 18:25 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Hank Rogers <Hank@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-13 17:52 -0600
Cult of Unix (was: Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-15 00:30 +0000
Re: Cult of Unix Hank Rogers <Hank@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-14 20:05 -0600
Re: Cult of Unix Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-15 03:16 -0500
Re: Cult of Unix vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-15 09:02 +0000
Re: Cult of Unix ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 11:10 -0700
Re: Cult of Unix Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-16 05:03 +0000
Re: 🏳️🌈Cult of Unix🏳️🌈 🌈💐🌻🌺🌹🌻💐🌷🌺🌈Jen🌈💐🌻🌺🌹🌻💐🌷🌺🌈 Dershmender 💐🌻🌺🌹🌻💐🌷🌺🐶笛🌈💐🌻🌺🌹🌻💐🌷🌺🌈 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2025-01-16 05:28 +0000
Re: Cult of Unix Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-16 10:34 -0500
Re: Cult of Unix vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-16 16:04 +0000
Re: Cult of Unix Hank Rogers <Hank@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-16 14:48 -0600
Re: Cult of Unix Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-16 18:06 -0500
Re: Cult of Unix Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-17 02:49 +0000
Re: Cult of Unix vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-17 03:51 +0000
Re: Cult of Unix Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-17 02:10 -0500
Re: Cult of Unix Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-17 23:55 +0000
Re: Cult of Unix Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-17 20:53 -0500
Re: Cult of Unix Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-19 00:54 +0000
Re: Cult of Unix Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-01-17 16:46 +0000
Re: Cult of Unix Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-17 23:56 +0000
Re: Cult of Unix Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-17 20:54 -0500
Re: Cult of Unix Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-19 00:55 +0000
Re: Cult of Unix Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 20:01 -0500
Re: Cult of Unix Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-17 00:10 +0000
Re: 🏳️🌈Cult of Unix (was: Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs)🏳️🌈 🌈💐🌻🌺🌹🌻💐🌷🌺🌈Jen🌈💐🌻🌺🌹🌻💐🌷🌺🌈 Dershmender 💐🌻🌺🌹🌻💐🌷🌺🐶笛🌈💐🌻🌺🌹🌻💐🌷🌺🌈 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2025-01-15 05:24 +0000
Setting up old-style backup on Windows 11 (was: Re: Cult of Unix) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-15 08:38 +0000
Re: 🏳️🌈Setting up old-style backup on Windows 11 (was: Re: Cult of Unix)🏳️🌈 🌈💐🌻🌺🌹🌻💐🌷🌺🌈Jen🌈💐🌻🌺🌹🌻💐🌷🌺🌈 Dershmender 💐🌻🌺🌹🌻💐🌷🌺🐶笛🌈💐🌻🌺🌹🌻💐🌷🌺🌈 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2025-01-15 17:22 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-13 21:44 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Manu Raju <MR@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-14 03:09 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-15 06:56 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-15 02:52 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-17 00:11 +0000
Defragging (was: Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-17 03:45 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-17 23:10 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 10:40 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 23:14 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-15 20:15 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-01-16 01:29 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-17 05:05 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-17 08:53 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-17 10:43 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-17 11:07 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-17 17:19 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-17 18:17 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-20 16:40 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-20 20:41 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-17 17:18 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-17 18:15 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 13:07 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-18 16:08 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 17:22 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-01-18 23:30 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 19:04 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-19 04:40 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-18 18:50 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 19:08 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-18 21:10 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-18 22:14 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 11:38 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-19 12:23 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 12:32 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-19 15:54 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 15:59 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-19 18:44 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 20:28 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-19 21:10 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 22:22 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 07:22 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-19 06:03 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-20 03:53 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 23:08 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-20 08:45 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-21 06:40 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-19 19:36 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-20 03:56 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-01-19 08:53 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-19 06:09 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-14 12:46 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-15 13:51 +0100
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-15 09:58 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-15 16:20 +0100
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 23:20 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-16 15:36 +0100
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-17 00:12 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 18:09 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-16 15:47 +0100
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-14 05:48 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Hank Rogers <Hank@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-13 16:48 -0600
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 23:54 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 11:33 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 10:46 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-15 11:33 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-15 17:02 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-15 12:33 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-16 05:40 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-16 06:27 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-27 22:49 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 14:32 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-15 15:52 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-15 20:34 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 00:41 -0600
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-16 06:42 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 14:40 -0600
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-16 16:34 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 16:56 -0600
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-16 22:40 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-17 02:04 -0600
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-17 07:34 -0600
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs roger <rduffy@hotmail.com.invalid - 2025-01-17 14:01 -0600
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-17 17:15 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-17 15:57 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-17 16:50 -0600
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-17 21:52 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-01-16 21:38 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-16 18:33 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 15:44 -0600
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 15:51 -0600
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 16:11 -0600
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux> - 2025-01-17 13:03 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-17 16:00 -0600
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-01-17 23:15 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-17 18:10 -0600
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-17 18:13 -0600
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-30 13:35 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-30 17:32 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-02-01 00:20 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-01 06:58 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-01 07:18 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-01 06:31 -0600
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-02-01 12:39 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-02-02 16:00 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-02-02 15:59 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-16 06:22 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-16 12:10 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-16 12:28 -0600
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-17 00:27 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-16 23:47 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-20 16:41 -0500
Gaming Laptops (was: Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-02-01 12:58 +0000
Re: Gaming Laptops Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-02-01 19:22 -0500
Re: Gaming Laptops chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-02 08:05 -0600
Re: Gaming Laptops candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-03 20:10 +0000
Re: Gaming Laptops Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-02-03 19:24 -0500
Re: Gaming Laptops pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-02-04 00:45 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Mark Lloyd <not.email@all.invalid> - 2025-01-16 18:45 +0000
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-16 16:05 -0500
Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 11:35 -0500
Page 1 of 10 [1] 2 3 … 10 Next page →
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-10 12:37 -0500 |
| Subject | Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs |
| Message-ID | <1VcgP.54962$XfF8.39289@fx04.iad> |
<https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/microsoft/microsoft-to-force-install-new-outlook-on-windows-10-pcs-in-february/> Microsoft will force install the new Outlook email client on Windows 10 systems starting with next month's security update. The announcement was made in a new message added to the company's Microsoft 365 Admin Center, tagged MC976059, and it applies to Microsoft 365 apps users. As Redmond explains, the new Outlook app will be installed on Windows 10 devices for users who deploy the optional January 28 update and force installed for all who install the February 11 security update. The new Outlook client will run alongside the classic Outlook app and will not modify configurations or user defaults. Microsoft added that there's no way to block it from being installed on Windows 10 devices; however, those who don't want it can remove it afterward. "New Outlook exists as an installed app on the device. For instance, it can be found in the Apps section of the Start Menu. It does not replace existing (classic) Outlook or change any configurations / user defaults. Both (classic) Outlook and New Outlook for Windows can run side by side," Microsoft says. "Currently, there isn't a way to block the new Outlook from being installed - if you prefer not to have new Outlook show up on your organization's devices, you can remove it after it's installed as part of the update," the company added in a support document updated on Thursday. New Outlook user interface New Outlook user interface (Microsoft) To remove the new Outlook app package after it's force installed on your Windows device, you can use the Remove-AppxProvisionedPackage cmdlet with the PackageName parameter value Microsoft.OutlookForWindows. This can be done by running the following command from a Windows PowerShell prompt and adding a new reg value: PowerShell: Remove-AppxProvisionedPackage -AllUsers -Online -PackageName (Get-AppxPackage Microsoft.OutlookForWindows).PackageFullName REG VALUE: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\WindowsUpdate\Orchestrator\UScheduler_Oobe\OutlookUpdate Next, add a REG_SZ registry setting named BlockedOobeUpdaters with a value of ["MS_Outlook"]. After removing the Outlook package, Windows Updates will not reinstall the new Outlook client. The first preview version of the new Outlook for Windows was introduced in May 2022. The app was generally available for personal accounts in September 2023 (via the September 26 Windows fall update and the Microsoft Store on Windows 11) and for commercial customers in August 2024. -- CrudeSausage Gab: @CrudeSausage Unapologetic paleoconservative
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-10 12:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vlrm7h$5ni9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683622 |
On 1/10/2025 12:37 PM, CrudeSausage wrote: > <https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/microsoft/microsoft-to-force-install-new-outlook-on-windows-10-pcs-in-february/> > > Microsoft will force install the new Outlook email client on Windows 10 > systems starting with next month's security update. Another nothing burger. Apparently you never noticed the deluge of apps a typical Linux distro forces on you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-10 13:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <76egP.617220$DYF8.550328@fx14.iad> |
| In reply to | #683625 |
On 2025-01-10 12:43, DFS wrote: > On 1/10/2025 12:37 PM, CrudeSausage wrote: >> <https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/microsoft/microsoft-to-force- >> install-new-outlook-on-windows-10-pcs-in-february/> >> >> Microsoft will force install the new Outlook email client on Windows >> 10 systems starting with next month's security update. > > Another nothing burger. > > Apparently you never noticed the deluge of apps a typical Linux distro > forces on you. Once again, you miss the point: your operating system does not care what you want or don't want because your computer doesn't belong to you. -- CrudeSausage Gab: @CrudeSausage Unapologetic paleoconservative
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-11 09:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vltdnc$hnde$9@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683635 |
On 2025-01-10, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > On 2025-01-10 12:43, DFS wrote: >> On 1/10/2025 12:37 PM, CrudeSausage wrote: >>> <https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/microsoft/microsoft-to-force- >>> install-new-outlook-on-windows-10-pcs-in-february/> >>> >>> Microsoft will force install the new Outlook email client on Windows >>> 10 systems starting with next month's security update. >> >> Another nothing burger. >> >> Apparently you never noticed the deluge of apps a typical Linux distro >> forces on you. > > Once again, you miss the point: your operating system does not care what > you want or don't want because your computer doesn't belong to you. What "apps" does Linux "force" on you, DuFuS? I guess you've never heard of minimal Linux installations? (Sorry to hijack your post, Crude.) -- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-11 07:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <uvtgP.479488$DPl.278796@fx13.iad> |
| In reply to | #683698 |
On 2025-01-11 04:30, RonB wrote: > On 2025-01-10, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >> On 2025-01-10 12:43, DFS wrote: >>> On 1/10/2025 12:37 PM, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>> <https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/microsoft/microsoft-to-force- >>>> install-new-outlook-on-windows-10-pcs-in-february/> >>>> >>>> Microsoft will force install the new Outlook email client on Windows >>>> 10 systems starting with next month's security update. >>> >>> Another nothing burger. >>> >>> Apparently you never noticed the deluge of apps a typical Linux distro >>> forces on you. >> >> Once again, you miss the point: your operating system does not care what >> you want or don't want because your computer doesn't belong to you. > > What "apps" does Linux "force" on you, DuFuS? I guess you've never heard of > minimal Linux installations? > > (Sorry to hijack your post, Crude.) Yeah, I don't think that he's experienced minimal installations that every distribution including Ubuntu allows nowadays. A default install obviously puts what it believes will be necessary apps for the user. However, nowadays they are aware that you might prefer Dragon Player over VLC or Brave over Firefox so they offer you a blank slate to work with. -- CrudeSausage Gab: @CrudeSausage Unapologetic paleoconservative
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-20 16:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vmmfpq$3et6v$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683635 |
On 1/10/2025 1:59 PM, CrudeSausage wrote: > On 2025-01-10 12:43, DFS wrote: >> On 1/10/2025 12:37 PM, CrudeSausage wrote: >>> <https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/microsoft/microsoft-to-force- >>> install-new-outlook-on-windows-10-pcs-in-february/> >>> >>> Microsoft will force install the new Outlook email client on Windows >>> 10 systems starting with next month's security update. >> >> Another nothing burger. >> >> Apparently you never noticed the deluge of apps a typical Linux distro >> forces on you. > > Once again, you miss the point: your operating system does not care what > you want or don't want because your computer doesn't belong to you. You're drinking way too much GuhNoo kook-aid lately. Linux distros don't care what you want or don't want - they put whatever THEY want on it, and you're usually forced to install it. Maybe some pieces can be uninstalled, and maybe not. The claim that most distros offer 'minimal installations' is totally untrue. Distrowatch recent ranking Distro minimal desktop install avail -------------- ----------------------------- 1 Mint no 2 MX Linux yes (Fluxbox only) 3 EndeavourOS yes 4 Debian yes 5 CachyOS no 6 Manjaro no 7 Pop!_OS no 8 Ubuntu no 9 Fedora yes (CoreOS) 10 openSUSE yes (network image) 11 Zorin no 12 Nobara no 13 elementary no 14 KDE neon no 15 antiX yes And your FOSS computer operating system doesn't belong to you in any way, shape or form. It's permissively licensed, but it's not yours. Many MS-hater kooks blather on about 'software freedom' and 'you have the source - fix it yourself'. Having the source code is nice, but the extreme difficulty of modifying and re/deploying 3rd party code means you're effectively locked into whatever they give you. Now what point did I miss?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-20 20:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <iVCjP.72721$oCrf.15913@fx33.iad> |
| In reply to | #684391 |
On 1/20/25 4:39 PM, DFS wrote: > On 1/10/2025 1:59 PM, CrudeSausage wrote: >> On 2025-01-10 12:43, DFS wrote: >>> On 1/10/2025 12:37 PM, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>> <https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/microsoft/microsoft-to-force- >>>> install-new-outlook-on-windows-10-pcs-in-february/> >>>> >>>> Microsoft will force install the new Outlook email client on Windows >>>> 10 systems starting with next month's security update. >>> >>> Another nothing burger. >>> >>> Apparently you never noticed the deluge of apps a typical Linux >>> distro forces on you. >> >> Once again, you miss the point: your operating system does not care >> what you want or don't want because your computer doesn't belong to you. > > > You're drinking way too much GuhNoo kook-aid lately. > > Linux distros don't care what you want or don't want - they put whatever > THEY want on it, and you're usually forced to install it. Maybe some > pieces can be uninstalled, and maybe not. > > The claim that most distros offer 'minimal installations' is totally > untrue. > > Distrowatch recent ranking > Distro minimal desktop install avail > -------------- ----------------------------- > 1 Mint no > 2 MX Linux yes (Fluxbox only) > 3 EndeavourOS yes > 4 Debian yes > 5 CachyOS no > 6 Manjaro no > 7 Pop!_OS no > 8 Ubuntu no > 9 Fedora yes (CoreOS) > 10 openSUSE yes (network image) > 11 Zorin no > 12 Nobara no > 13 elementary no > 14 KDE neon no > 15 antiX yes > > And your FOSS computer operating system doesn't belong to you in any > way, shape or form. It's permissively licensed, but it's not yours. > > Many MS-hater kooks blather on about 'software freedom' and 'you have > the source - fix it yourself'. Having the source code is nice, but the > extreme difficulty of modifying and re/deploying 3rd party code means > you're effectively locked into whatever they give you. > > Now what point did I miss? Install any of the distributions in that list and you can remove _every_ application it comes with. You can make it as minimal as you wish if it doesn't already allow you to install minimally. A quick look at that list though says that Ubuntu doesn't allow a minimal install. It does, so your facts are wrong. You can check a review of the last few Ubuntu releases on YouTube for proof. As for the distributions there that I tried, like Pop!_OS and Nobara, a minimal install would defeat the purpose of even using the distribution. One is based on Ubuntu and has modifications to make it better for the computers it sells, power management, NVIDIA support and gaming in general. In the case of Nobara, it is Fedora with the patches necessary to make NVIDIA a better experience, same with gaming and a number of modifications for ASUS hardware. If you wanted a minimal install of either, just use Ubuntu and Fedora. I'll say it again though: all of them allow you to remove and replace whatever you wish. With Windows, you can't even remove Edge without it coming back the moment you update. -- CrudeSausage Gab: @CrudeSausage Telegram: @CrudeSausage Unapologetic paleoconservative KDE supporting member ASUS Zephyrus GA401QM on Manjaro
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-21 06:05 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <t03vojtntdfrarhbf3l6t3phghqbaebsn5@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #684399 |
CrudeSausage wrote: > some dumb fsck wrote: >> >> (idiocy and lies, snipped) Out of the other side of this dumb fsck's filthy, lying gob, he'll whine about "too many choices" in Linux distros. >Install any of the distributions in that list and you can remove _every_ >application it comes with. You can make it as minimal as you wish if it >doesn't already allow you to install minimally. > >A quick look at that list though says that Ubuntu doesn't allow a >minimal install. It does, so your facts are wrong. You can check a >review of the last few Ubuntu releases on YouTube for proof. As for the >distributions there that I tried, like Pop!_OS and Nobara, a minimal >install would defeat the purpose of even using the distribution. One is >based on Ubuntu and has modifications to make it better for the >computers it sells, power management, NVIDIA support and gaming in >general. In the case of Nobara, it is Fedora with the patches necessary >to make NVIDIA a better experience, same with gaming and a number of >modifications for ASUS hardware. If you wanted a minimal install of >either, just use Ubuntu and Fedora. Right. Even if DumFSck wasn't lying about the user's freedom to customize his installation, he's still ignoring the fact that with GNU/Linux there is orders of magnitude more choice in pre-packaged distributions, compared to WinDOS. -- "In other words, you take what they give you and you better like it." - DumFSck, lying shamelessly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-21 08:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <VBNjP.729118$2xE6.727066@fx18.iad> |
| In reply to | #684406 |
On 1/21/25 7:05 AM, chrisv wrote: > CrudeSausage wrote: > >> some dumb fsck wrote: >>> >>> (idiocy and lies, snipped) > > Out of the other side of this dumb fsck's filthy, lying gob, he'll > whine about "too many choices" in Linux distros. > >> Install any of the distributions in that list and you can remove _every_ >> application it comes with. You can make it as minimal as you wish if it >> doesn't already allow you to install minimally. >> >> A quick look at that list though says that Ubuntu doesn't allow a >> minimal install. It does, so your facts are wrong. You can check a >> review of the last few Ubuntu releases on YouTube for proof. As for the >> distributions there that I tried, like Pop!_OS and Nobara, a minimal >> install would defeat the purpose of even using the distribution. One is >> based on Ubuntu and has modifications to make it better for the >> computers it sells, power management, NVIDIA support and gaming in >> general. In the case of Nobara, it is Fedora with the patches necessary >> to make NVIDIA a better experience, same with gaming and a number of >> modifications for ASUS hardware. If you wanted a minimal install of >> either, just use Ubuntu and Fedora. > > Right. Even if DumFSck wasn't lying about the user's freedom to > customize his installation, he's still ignoring the fact that with > GNU/Linux there is orders of magnitude more choice in pre-packaged > distributions, compared to WinDOS. One of those choices is to replace whatever comes with your Linux distribution with tlp for improved power efficiency. If you're not a fan of Firefox, you can remove it and put on Chrome, Chromium or Brave without the initial browser bugging you. If Thunderbird is not your cup of tea, feel free to install Kmail, Evolution or Sylpheed without Thunderbird sending you ads telling you that you've committed the crime of thinking differently. Heck, you can change the audio system if you find that the default is lacking and even change the animations when you open, close or minimize windows if you feel that they're not your style. Even for your GPU, if you're a masochist, you can remove the proprietary driver and use the open one (I'm ignoring AMD here whose open driver is superior to the proprietary one). You can't do most of the above in Windows without buying a third-party application. I'm sure the application will do that and more, but you had to pay for the honour and the system's stability will likely be impacted anyway. -- CrudeSausage Gab: @CrudeSausage Telegram: @CrudeSausage Unapologetic paleoconservative KDE supporting member ASUS Zephyrus GA401QM on Manjaro
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-10 20:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <luddc8Fbie3U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #683625 |
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 12:43:14 -0500, DFS wrote: > On 1/10/2025 12:37 PM, CrudeSausage wrote: >> <https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/microsoft/microsoft-to-force- install-new-outlook-on-windows-10-pcs-in-february/> >> >> Microsoft will force install the new Outlook email client on Windows 10 >> systems starting with next month's security update. > > Another nothing burger. > > Apparently you never noticed the deluge of apps a typical Linux distro > forces on you. You can pick and choose during the installation. I'll admit I go for the default and get stuff like LibreOffice that I may never use on my personal machines but I'm lazy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-10 16:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vls3rh$7sq3$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683644 |
rbowman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code: > On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 12:43:14 -0500, DFS wrote: > >> On 1/10/2025 12:37 PM, CrudeSausage wrote: >>> <https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/microsoft/microsoft-to-force- > install-new-outlook-on-windows-10-pcs-in-february/> >>> >>> Microsoft will force install the new Outlook email client on Windows 10 >>> systems starting with next month's security update. >> >> Another nothing burger. >> >> Apparently you never noticed the deluge of apps a typical Linux distro >> forces on you. > > You can pick and choose during the installation. I'll admit I go for the > default and get stuff like LibreOffice that I may never use on my personal > machines but I'm lazy. I like DFS using the word "deluge", when the disk space of this "deluge" is far smaller than getting the same kinds of apps on Windows. Big offenders: Microsoft Office and Visual Studio. Windows itself. -- * joeyh cvs commits his home directory. Aaaaaa <drow> eeeeeeek <drow> joeyh: That is simply evil. Period.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-11 09:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vltdpo$hnde$10@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683644 |
On 2025-01-10, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 12:43:14 -0500, DFS wrote: > >> On 1/10/2025 12:37 PM, CrudeSausage wrote: >>> <https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/microsoft/microsoft-to-force- > install-new-outlook-on-windows-10-pcs-in-february/> >>> >>> Microsoft will force install the new Outlook email client on Windows 10 >>> systems starting with next month's security update. >> >> Another nothing burger. >> >> Apparently you never noticed the deluge of apps a typical Linux distro >> forces on you. > > You can pick and choose during the installation. I'll admit I go for the > default and get stuff like LibreOffice that I may never use on my personal > machines but I'm lazy. Same here. Except when I'm installing Linux on small SSDs (like 8 GBs on my Wyse Thin Clients). -- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-11 12:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <678260ef$0$29746$426a74cc@news.free.fr> |
| In reply to | #683625 |
Le 10-01-2025, DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> a écrit : > On 1/10/2025 12:37 PM, CrudeSausage wrote: >> <https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/microsoft/microsoft-to-force-install-new-outlook-on-windows-10-pcs-in-february/> >> >> Microsoft will force install the new Outlook email client on Windows 10 >> systems starting with next month's security update. > > Another nothing burger. > > Apparently you never noticed the deluge of apps a typical Linux distro > forces on you. They are not forced, they are installed by default. It's something different. With Android, they are forced: you can't remove some apps. With Linux, you can remove and change every default as you want. The only difficulty will be to change the init process. Switching between systemd and something else will be, at least, difficult. But everything else can be changed. Now, you can choose either the distro who let you install only what you need instead of choosing a distro who install everything you don't want. -- Si vous avez du temps à perdre : https://scarpet42.gitlab.io
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-12 23:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vm1iog$1f1ma$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683625 |
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 12:43:14 -0500, DFS wrote: > Apparently you never noticed the deluge of apps a typical Linux distro > forces on you. Have you noticed this happening on your Linux installs? Please tell us. Or is this something else you read in The Guardian?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-13 12:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vm31t2$1pbsb$9@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683879 |
On 2025-01-12, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: > On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 12:43:14 -0500, DFS wrote: > >> Apparently you never noticed the deluge of apps a typical Linux distro >> forces on you. > > Have you noticed this happening on your Linux installs? Please tell us. > > Or is this something else you read in The Guardian? Yeah (to DuFuS), I've never noticed them because they are NOT forced on me. -- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-13 22:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vm4mtl$290mt$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683879 |
On 1/12/2025 6:20 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 12:43:14 -0500, DFS wrote: > >> Apparently you never noticed the deluge of apps a typical Linux distro >> forces on you. > > Have you noticed this happening on your Linux installs? Please tell us. Yes. For years I've installed distros by booting a LiveCD/DVD, trying it for a little while, and if I liked it enough, installing from the live desktop (setting it up as a dual-boot). It's been a long time since I recall being offered individual packages or roles to install - it usually just forced a lot of junk on you. > Or is this something else you read in The Guardian? You need to work on your trolling, fella. 'DFS reads the Guardian' is silly and ineffective.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-21 22:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vmp7v0$endb$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683965 |
On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 22:50:16 -0500, DFS wrote: > On 1/12/2025 6:20 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > >> On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 12:43:14 -0500, DFS wrote: >> >>> Apparently you never noticed the deluge of apps a typical Linux distro >>> forces on you. >> >> Have you noticed this happening on your Linux installs? Please tell us. > > Yes. For years I've installed distros by booting a LiveCD/DVD, trying > it for a little while, and if I liked it enough, installing from the > live desktop (setting it up as a dual-boot). It's been a long time > since I recall being offered individual packages or roles to install - > it usually just forced a lot of junk on you. It really has been a long time, hasn’t it? >> Or is this something else you read in The Guardian? > > 'DFS reads the Guardian' is silly and ineffective. But true. You admitted it yourself.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-10 12:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <8jn2oj18a4m2lvthh5he2n0f281i2cumjt@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #683622 |
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: ><https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/microsoft/microsoft-to-force-install-new-outlook-on-windows-10-pcs-in-february/> > >Microsoft will force install the new Outlook email client on Windows 10 >systems starting with next month's security update. > >The announcement was made in a new message added to the company's >Microsoft 365 Admin Center, tagged MC976059, and it applies to Microsoft >365 apps users. > >As Redmond explains, the new Outlook app will be installed on Windows 10 >devices for users who deploy the optional January 28 update and force >installed for all who install the February 11 security update. > >The new Outlook client will run alongside the classic Outlook app and >will not modify configurations or user defaults. Microsoft added that >there's no way to block it from being installed on Windows 10 devices; >however, those who don't want it can remove it afterward. > >"New Outlook exists as an installed app on the device. For instance, it >can be found in the Apps section of the Start Menu. It does not replace >existing (classic) Outlook or change any configurations / user defaults. >Both (classic) Outlook and New Outlook for Windows can run side by >side," Microsoft says. > >"Currently, there isn't a way to block the new Outlook from being >installed - if you prefer not to have new Outlook show up on your >organization's devices, you can remove it after it's installed as part >of the update," the company added in a support document updated on Thursday. > >New Outlook user interface >New Outlook user interface (Microsoft) >To remove the new Outlook app package after it's force installed on your >Windows device, you can use the Remove-AppxProvisionedPackage cmdlet >with the PackageName parameter value Microsoft.OutlookForWindows. > >This can be done by running the following command from a Windows >PowerShell prompt and adding a new reg value: > >PowerShell: Remove-AppxProvisionedPackage -AllUsers -Online -PackageName >(Get-AppxPackage Microsoft.OutlookForWindows).PackageFullName > >REG VALUE: >HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\WindowsUpdate\Orchestrator\UScheduler_Oobe\OutlookUpdate >Next, add a REG_SZ registry setting named BlockedOobeUpdaters with a >value of ["MS_Outlook"]. After removing the Outlook package, Windows >Updates will not reinstall the new Outlook client. > >The first preview version of the new Outlook for Windows was introduced >in May 2022. The app was generally available for personal accounts in >September 2023 (via the September 26 Windows fall update and the >Microsoft Store on Windows 11) and for commercial customers in August 2024. It's a good app, I'm doing well with Thunderbird, since I'm not running Windows, though. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-11 09:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vltdi6$hnde$8@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683622 |
On 2025-01-10, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: ><https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/microsoft/microsoft-to-force-install-new-outlook-on-windows-10-pcs-in-february/> > > Microsoft will force install the new Outlook email client on Windows 10 > systems starting with next month's security update. > > The announcement was made in a new message added to the company's > Microsoft 365 Admin Center, tagged MC976059, and it applies to Microsoft > 365 apps users. > > As Redmond explains, the new Outlook app will be installed on Windows 10 > devices for users who deploy the optional January 28 update and force > installed for all who install the February 11 security update. > > The new Outlook client will run alongside the classic Outlook app and > will not modify configurations or user defaults. Microsoft added that > there's no way to block it from being installed on Windows 10 devices; > however, those who don't want it can remove it afterward. > > "New Outlook exists as an installed app on the device. For instance, it > can be found in the Apps section of the Start Menu. It does not replace > existing (classic) Outlook or change any configurations / user defaults. > Both (classic) Outlook and New Outlook for Windows can run side by > side," Microsoft says. > > "Currently, there isn't a way to block the new Outlook from being > installed - if you prefer not to have new Outlook show up on your > organization's devices, you can remove it after it's installed as part > of the update," the company added in a support document updated on Thursday. > > New Outlook user interface > New Outlook user interface (Microsoft) > To remove the new Outlook app package after it's force installed on your > Windows device, you can use the Remove-AppxProvisionedPackage cmdlet > with the PackageName parameter value Microsoft.OutlookForWindows. > > This can be done by running the following command from a Windows > PowerShell prompt and adding a new reg value: > > PowerShell: Remove-AppxProvisionedPackage -AllUsers -Online -PackageName > (Get-AppxPackage Microsoft.OutlookForWindows).PackageFullName > > REG VALUE: > HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\WindowsUpdate\Orchestrator\UScheduler_Oobe\OutlookUpdate > Next, add a REG_SZ registry setting named BlockedOobeUpdaters with a > value of ["MS_Outlook"]. After removing the Outlook package, Windows > Updates will not reinstall the new Outlook client. > > The first preview version of the new Outlook for Windows was introduced > in May 2022. The app was generally available for personal accounts in > September 2023 (via the September 26 Windows fall update and the > Microsoft Store on Windows 11) and for commercial customers in August 2024. Even if I used Windows I wouldn't use Outlook. -- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-11 04:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5ie4ojdu445pm7gskvq0c2cbchjk3hfvvp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #683697 |
RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2025-01-10, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >><https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/microsoft/microsoft-to-force-install-new-outlook-on-windows-10-pcs-in-february/> >> >> Microsoft will force install the new Outlook email client on Windows 10 >> systems starting with next month's security update. >> >> The announcement was made in a new message added to the company's >> Microsoft 365 Admin Center, tagged MC976059, and it applies to Microsoft >> 365 apps users. >> >> As Redmond explains, the new Outlook app will be installed on Windows 10 >> devices for users who deploy the optional January 28 update and force >> installed for all who install the February 11 security update. >> >> The new Outlook client will run alongside the classic Outlook app and >> will not modify configurations or user defaults. Microsoft added that >> there's no way to block it from being installed on Windows 10 devices; >> however, those who don't want it can remove it afterward. >> >> "New Outlook exists as an installed app on the device. For instance, it >> can be found in the Apps section of the Start Menu. It does not replace >> existing (classic) Outlook or change any configurations / user defaults. >> Both (classic) Outlook and New Outlook for Windows can run side by >> side," Microsoft says. >> >> "Currently, there isn't a way to block the new Outlook from being >> installed - if you prefer not to have new Outlook show up on your >> organization's devices, you can remove it after it's installed as part >> of the update," the company added in a support document updated on Thursday. >> >> New Outlook user interface >> New Outlook user interface (Microsoft) >> To remove the new Outlook app package after it's force installed on your >> Windows device, you can use the Remove-AppxProvisionedPackage cmdlet >> with the PackageName parameter value Microsoft.OutlookForWindows. >> >> This can be done by running the following command from a Windows >> PowerShell prompt and adding a new reg value: >> >> PowerShell: Remove-AppxProvisionedPackage -AllUsers -Online -PackageName >> (Get-AppxPackage Microsoft.OutlookForWindows).PackageFullName >> >> REG VALUE: >> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\WindowsUpdate\Orchestrator\UScheduler_Oobe\OutlookUpdate >> Next, add a REG_SZ registry setting named BlockedOobeUpdaters with a >> value of ["MS_Outlook"]. After removing the Outlook package, Windows >> Updates will not reinstall the new Outlook client. >> >> The first preview version of the new Outlook for Windows was introduced >> in May 2022. The app was generally available for personal accounts in >> September 2023 (via the September 26 Windows fall update and the >> Microsoft Store on Windows 11) and for commercial customers in August 2024. > >Even if I used Windows I wouldn't use Outlook. I would use it under Win11 in another life, where I wasn't supported by the OSS community. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 10 [1] 2 3 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web