Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #679184 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sales <sales@drpepper.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-12-07 15:08 -0800 |
| Last post | 2024-12-09 10:26 -0600 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 362 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Sales <sales@drpepper.com> - 2024-12-07 15:08 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 18:47 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-07 15:51 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 19:12 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-07 16:46 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 19:59 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-07 17:04 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 20:18 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-07 17:27 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 20:33 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-07 17:49 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 21:01 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-07 18:13 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 22:45 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-07 20:08 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 23:24 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-07 22:47 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 08:15 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 10:37 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 15:37 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 15:34 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 18:57 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 16:13 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 19:19 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 16:25 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 19:49 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 16:52 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 20:05 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 17:14 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-09 07:38 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 08:23 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 10:40 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-09 13:52 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 14:05 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 09:13 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 10:39 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 09:21 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 11:28 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 10:20 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 10:39 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 10:37 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 00:26 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-07 22:47 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 10:41 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 10:34 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 10:30 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-07 21:14 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 22:45 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-08 03:54 +0000
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-08 07:42 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 08:21 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 10:39 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 15:41 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 15:32 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 18:59 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 16:24 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 19:47 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 16:53 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 20:06 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 17:16 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 20:20 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 18:02 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 10:31 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 10:44 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 14:09 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 11:21 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 14:31 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 11:33 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 14:52 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 12:28 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 15:49 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 14:29 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 10:05 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 10:18 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 13:37 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 10:42 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 13:53 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 13:06 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 11:19 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 14:24 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 12:04 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 15:13 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 12:14 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 15:51 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 13:02 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 16:17 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 13:23 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 17:14 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 14:19 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 17:34 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 14:57 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 18:10 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 15:13 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:26 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:26 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:24 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-11 20:42 +0000
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Howie Feltersnatch <a@apple.sux> - 2024-12-14 20:53 +0100
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-14 12:06 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-10 23:06 +0000
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 18:33 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 15:36 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 09:54 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 09:16 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 12:31 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 10:19 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 13:36 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:33 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:30 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:29 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:28 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:28 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 15:41 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-11 00:27 +0000
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 09:57 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 09:18 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 12:31 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 10:21 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 13:38 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 10:45 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:37 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:36 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:35 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:17 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:15 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Howie Feltersnatch <a@apple.sux> - 2024-12-14 20:18 +0100
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-14 11:33 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:14 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:12 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 12:55 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 09:27 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 09:27 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 09:25 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 09:24 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 09:23 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 10:47 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-08 14:45 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 15:47 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-08 17:34 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 17:46 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 15:33 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 19:04 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 16:25 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 19:48 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 16:53 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 16:54 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 20:07 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 17:16 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 20:24 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 18:03 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 23:51 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 23:20 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 02:32 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 23:47 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 02:51 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 00:08 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 03:14 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 00:16 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 03:29 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 11:40 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 10:43 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 11:01 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-10 12:31 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 12:46 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 10:15 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-10 15:42 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 16:00 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 13:04 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 16:23 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 13:28 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 17:31 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 14:46 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 18:00 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 15:09 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-10 20:02 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 14:07 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:58 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:56 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-10 19:55 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:54 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:54 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 10:24 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 13:40 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 10:44 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 13:57 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 11:21 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 14:27 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 12:05 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 15:15 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 12:22 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 15:53 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 13:02 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 16:21 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 13:26 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 17:24 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 14:55 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 18:03 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 15:07 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 10:30 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 09:19 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 12:29 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 10:19 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-12-11 18:27 +0000
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 10:38 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-11 15:14 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 13:34 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 10:44 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 13:56 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 11:07 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 14:19 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 11:22 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 14:38 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-11 15:42 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 13:33 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 18:03 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 15:22 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 18:34 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 15:44 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 19:13 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 16:20 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 19:31 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 16:38 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 19:57 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 17:00 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 20:21 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 17:23 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 20:39 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 17:45 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 21:02 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 18:08 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 21:18 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 18:57 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 22:48 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 19:51 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 21:49 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 18:58 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 22:37 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 19:43 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 22:49 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 19:53 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-12 12:51 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-12 10:44 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-12 14:22 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-12 11:33 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-12 14:49 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-12 12:10 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-12 15:20 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-12 12:27 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-12 15:38 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 13:26 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 17:24 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 15:18 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 18:30 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 15:42 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 18:47 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 15:50 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:52 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 14:40 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-02 12:58 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 17:05 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-02 16:43 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 19:51 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-02 17:54 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 21:23 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-02 18:35 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 21:40 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-02 20:13 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 15:05 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-03 14:55 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 18:45 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-03 16:19 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 19:30 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-03 17:11 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 20:25 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-03 17:41 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 21:01 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-03 19:39 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. paranoia <mixmaster@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2025-01-03 22:23 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-03 23:52 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 20:36 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-05 18:19 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 14:48 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-05 13:00 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 16:43 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-05 18:18 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 21:27 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. AlphaHeater <AlphaHeater21@6959.concepte.store> - 2025-01-06 02:52 +0000
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-05 19:03 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-05 19:47 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel Crump <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 22:58 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-05 23:33 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 06:31 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-06 09:42 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 13:03 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-06 10:19 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 13:23 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-06 10:53 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 14:17 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-06 11:23 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 14:36 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-06 15:49 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 19:01 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-06 16:20 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 19:35 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-06 16:41 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 19:54 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-06 16:56 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 20:09 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-06 17:12 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 20:23 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-06 17:27 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 20:37 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-06 17:49 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 20:55 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-06 18:05 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 21:11 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-06 18:58 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 22:08 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-06 20:42 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. ron <ronbarnes@linuxmail.org> - 2025-01-12 22:59 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-07 22:02 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-06 13:56 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel Crump <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 14:25 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-06 13:55 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-06 13:53 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-06 13:31 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 13:47 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-06 08:21 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-03 09:49 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-03 09:46 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-03 09:45 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-03 09:42 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:47 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:44 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:44 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:42 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:41 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 14:43 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:39 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 13:17 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 10:52 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 14:13 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 11:15 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 14:06 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 14:05 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 13:02 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 12:09 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-09 09:53 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 10:31 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 10:39 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 14:07 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 11:25 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 14:34 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 11:36 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 09:17 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 11:39 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 11:38 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 11:36 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 11:34 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 10:46 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 10:27 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 10:26 -0600
Page 15 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 13 14 [15] 16 17 … 19 Next page →
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-05 18:19 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vlfeil$1abm6$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683059 |
On 2025-01-05 17:36, Joel wrote: > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >> On 2025-01-03 22:23, paranoia wrote: >>> On 1/3/2025 7:39 PM, Alan wrote: >>>> >>>> Windows copied much of its structure from VMS. >>> >>> Windows didn't "copy" anything of the sort. Cutler used ~some~ similar >>> CLI/CMD features and the hierarchical file systems. Otherwise there is >>> little in common between ntoskrnl and the OpenVMS kernel. >>> >>> I have Windows 2000RC2 AXP running on an AlphaServer DS10 that also >>> boots Tru64 5.1B and OpenVMS 8.3. You have to change the BIOS from SRM >>> to AlphaBIOS to run Windows. >> >> You should do a little more research. > > > Your use of "copy" is the problem. > In what way? Did they copy the structures of VMS? Yes. They did.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-05 14:48 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <6eolnjp7m82qmtkg3ag94g73084j6jjbqo@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #682689 |
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >> Windows did not come about by copying anything else, >> doing the same thing as, sure, not copying. >Copying. > >It's been documented. > >Windows copied much of its structure from VMS. That's saying it incorrectly, face it. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-05 13:00 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vlersr$16oeg$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683007 |
On 2025-01-05 11:48, Joel wrote: > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: > >>> Windows did not come about by copying anything else, >>> doing the same thing as, sure, not copying. >> Copying. >> >> It's been documented. >> >> Windows copied much of its structure from VMS. > > > That's saying it incorrectly, face it. > In what way is it incorrect? 'The I/O Manager Windows NT has a very distinctive and unique I/O manager. Actually, it's not quite unique, because it the same as the VMS manager. Unlike many other systems, VMS and NT I/O is packet based and asynchronous. To communicate with the outside world, a programme asks the kernel to send some information to a device, and potentially return the reply. This is when the kernel uses the I/O manager.' 'Memory management As mentioned above, NT, VMS and even RSX-11M, VMS's predecessor, split the memory in two - half for the kernel and half for the user. However, the similarities go deeper than this. As RSX-11M was expected to work on such a small machine (the PDP-11), its memory management was very efficient and sophisticated. One of the ideas that it, and VMS, used were `working sets'; every process had one. What a working set did was define the upper and lower limit of the amount of physical memory allocatable to that process. This system ensures that one process using large amounts of memory will not squash other, smaller processes into smaller and smaller amounts of memory. Windows NT's memory manager also uses working sets, along with all the other optimizations, algorithms and methods used by RSX-11M to get the most out a computer's memory, no matter how small.' <https://everything2.com/title/The+similarities+between+VMS+and+Windows+NT> It goes on to describe many more ways that NT copied VMS: Kernel and Executive subsytem Interrupt handling I/O in general Scheduling And this: 'Conclusion Obviously, DEC weren't happy with the apparent similarity of Windows NT and their product, VMS. In fact, when DEC's engineers noticed the problem, and brought their concern to the senior management, suing Microsoft for intellectual property violation was a possibility. Instead, there was an out of court settlement with Microsoft. As a result, `Affinity for OpenVMS', a scheme to train DEC's technicians and promote NT and OpenVMS as complimentary pieces of a networking solution was announced in summer of 1995. Plus, Microsoft promised to maintain NT support for the DEC Alpha processor and paid DEC up to $100 million. I'd say Bill Gates got off quite lightly.'
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-05 16:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <o2vlnjpu74a0g88c3nvho09iqki2711lnc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #683018 |
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>> Windows copied much of its structure from VMS. >> >> That's saying it incorrectly, face it. > >In what way is it incorrect? > >'The I/O Manager > >Windows NT has a very distinctive and unique I/O manager. Actually, it's >not quite unique, because it the same as the VMS manager. Unlike many >other systems, VMS and NT I/O is packet based and asynchronous. To >communicate with the outside world, a programme asks the kernel to send >some information to a device, and potentially return the reply. This is >when the kernel uses the I/O manager.' > >'Memory management > >As mentioned above, NT, VMS and even RSX-11M, VMS's predecessor, split >the memory in two - half for the kernel and half for the user. However, >the similarities go deeper than this. >As RSX-11M was expected to work on such a small machine (the PDP-11), >its memory management was very efficient and sophisticated. One of the >ideas that it, and VMS, used were `working sets'; every process had one. >What a working set did was define the upper and lower limit of the >amount of physical memory allocatable to that process. This system >ensures that one process using large amounts of memory will not squash >other, smaller processes into smaller and smaller amounts of memory. >Windows NT's memory manager also uses working sets, along with all the >other optimizations, algorithms and methods used by RSX-11M to get the >most out a computer's memory, no matter how small.' > ><https://everything2.com/title/The+similarities+between+VMS+and+Windows+NT> > >It goes on to describe many more ways that NT copied VMS: > >Kernel and Executive subsytem > >Interrupt handling > >I/O in general > >Scheduling > >And this: > >'Conclusion > >Obviously, DEC weren't happy with the apparent similarity of Windows NT >and their product, VMS. In fact, when DEC's engineers noticed the >problem, and brought their concern to the senior management, suing >Microsoft for intellectual property violation was a possibility. >Instead, there was an out of court settlement with Microsoft. >As a result, `Affinity for OpenVMS', a scheme to train DEC's technicians >and promote NT and OpenVMS as complimentary pieces of a networking >solution was announced in summer of 1995. Plus, Microsoft promised to >maintain NT support for the DEC Alpha processor and paid DEC up to $100 >million. I'd say Bill Gates got off quite lightly.' "Getting off lightly" in a settlement means plaintiffs gave up their butthurt suit, for a small token settlement - M$ had little to lose, with it. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-05 18:18 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vlfehg$1abm6$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683026 |
On 2025-01-05 13:43, Joel wrote: > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: > >>>> Windows copied much of its structure from VMS. >>> >>> That's saying it incorrectly, face it. >> >> In what way is it incorrect? >> >> 'The I/O Manager >> >> Windows NT has a very distinctive and unique I/O manager. Actually, it's >> not quite unique, because it the same as the VMS manager. Unlike many >> other systems, VMS and NT I/O is packet based and asynchronous. To >> communicate with the outside world, a programme asks the kernel to send >> some information to a device, and potentially return the reply. This is >> when the kernel uses the I/O manager.' >> >> 'Memory management >> >> As mentioned above, NT, VMS and even RSX-11M, VMS's predecessor, split >> the memory in two - half for the kernel and half for the user. However, >> the similarities go deeper than this. >> As RSX-11M was expected to work on such a small machine (the PDP-11), >> its memory management was very efficient and sophisticated. One of the >> ideas that it, and VMS, used were `working sets'; every process had one. >> What a working set did was define the upper and lower limit of the >> amount of physical memory allocatable to that process. This system >> ensures that one process using large amounts of memory will not squash >> other, smaller processes into smaller and smaller amounts of memory. >> Windows NT's memory manager also uses working sets, along with all the >> other optimizations, algorithms and methods used by RSX-11M to get the >> most out a computer's memory, no matter how small.' >> >> <https://everything2.com/title/The+similarities+between+VMS+and+Windows+NT> >> >> It goes on to describe many more ways that NT copied VMS: >> >> Kernel and Executive subsytem >> >> Interrupt handling >> >> I/O in general >> >> Scheduling >> >> And this: >> >> 'Conclusion >> >> Obviously, DEC weren't happy with the apparent similarity of Windows NT >> and their product, VMS. In fact, when DEC's engineers noticed the >> problem, and brought their concern to the senior management, suing >> Microsoft for intellectual property violation was a possibility. >> Instead, there was an out of court settlement with Microsoft. >> As a result, `Affinity for OpenVMS', a scheme to train DEC's technicians >> and promote NT and OpenVMS as complimentary pieces of a networking >> solution was announced in summer of 1995. Plus, Microsoft promised to >> maintain NT support for the DEC Alpha processor and paid DEC up to $100 >> million. I'd say Bill Gates got off quite lightly.' > > > "Getting off lightly" in a settlement means plaintiffs gave up their > butthurt suit, for a small token settlement - M$ had little to lose, > with it. > $100 million in the mind '90s was hardly a "token".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-05 21:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <apfmnjd4fvfrn3afsdk3udg07dpskn2ls1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #683069 |
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>> Obviously, DEC weren't happy with the apparent similarity of Windows NT >>> and their product, VMS. In fact, when DEC's engineers noticed the >>> problem, and brought their concern to the senior management, suing >>> Microsoft for intellectual property violation was a possibility. >>> Instead, there was an out of court settlement with Microsoft. >>> As a result, `Affinity for OpenVMS', a scheme to train DEC's technicians >>> and promote NT and OpenVMS as complimentary pieces of a networking >>> solution was announced in summer of 1995. Plus, Microsoft promised to >>> maintain NT support for the DEC Alpha processor and paid DEC up to $100 >>> million. I'd say Bill Gates got off quite lightly.' >> >> "Getting off lightly" in a settlement means plaintiffs gave up their >> butthurt suit, for a small token settlement - M$ had little to lose, >> with it. > >$100 million in the mind '90s was hardly a "token". For an individual, sure, but to M$ as a cost of doing business, likely worth it. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | AlphaHeater <AlphaHeater21@6959.concepte.store> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-06 02:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <20250106025230.1F3311200AE@fleegle.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #683075 |
In article <apfmnjd4fvfrn3afsdk3udg07dpskn2ls1@4ax.com> Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote: This thread needs to die, as it's very repetitive and super boring.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-05 19:03 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vlfh5a$1ao46$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683079 |
On 2025-01-05 18:52, AlphaHeater wrote: > In article <apfmnjd4fvfrn3afsdk3udg07dpskn2ls1@4ax.com> > Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote: > > This thread needs to die, as it's very repetitive and super boring. So don't read it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-05 19:47 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vlfjof$1epbt$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683075 |
On 2025-01-05 18:27, Joel wrote: > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: > >>>> Obviously, DEC weren't happy with the apparent similarity of Windows NT >>>> and their product, VMS. In fact, when DEC's engineers noticed the >>>> problem, and brought their concern to the senior management, suing >>>> Microsoft for intellectual property violation was a possibility. >>>> Instead, there was an out of court settlement with Microsoft. >>>> As a result, `Affinity for OpenVMS', a scheme to train DEC's technicians >>>> and promote NT and OpenVMS as complimentary pieces of a networking >>>> solution was announced in summer of 1995. Plus, Microsoft promised to >>>> maintain NT support for the DEC Alpha processor and paid DEC up to $100 >>>> million. I'd say Bill Gates got off quite lightly.' >>> >>> "Getting off lightly" in a settlement means plaintiffs gave up their >>> butthurt suit, for a small token settlement - M$ had little to lose, >>> with it. >> >> $100 million in the mind '90s was hardly a "token". > > > For an individual, sure, but to M$ as a cost of doing business, likely > worth it. > In 1995, Microsoft's net income after taxes were $1,453,000,000. So $100 million was almost 7% of that. Hardly a "token". And that's what they paid to avoid a suit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel Crump <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-05 22:58 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <677b54b0$0$2787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> |
| In reply to | #683086 |
On 1/5/25 10:47 PM, Alan wrote: > On 2025-01-05 18:27, Joel wrote: >> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >> >>>>> Obviously, DEC weren't happy with the apparent similarity of >>>>> Windows NT >>>>> and their product, VMS. In fact, when DEC's engineers noticed the >>>>> problem, and brought their concern to the senior management, suing >>>>> Microsoft for intellectual property violation was a possibility. >>>>> Instead, there was an out of court settlement with Microsoft. >>>>> As a result, `Affinity for OpenVMS', a scheme to train DEC's >>>>> technicians >>>>> and promote NT and OpenVMS as complimentary pieces of a networking >>>>> solution was announced in summer of 1995. Plus, Microsoft promised to >>>>> maintain NT support for the DEC Alpha processor and paid DEC up to >>>>> $100 >>>>> million. I'd say Bill Gates got off quite lightly.' >>>> >>>> "Getting off lightly" in a settlement means plaintiffs gave up their >>>> butthurt suit, for a small token settlement - M$ had little to lose, >>>> with it. >>> >>> $100 million in the mind '90s was hardly a "token". >> >> For an individual, sure, but to M$ as a cost of doing business, likely >> worth it. > > In 1995, Microsoft's net income after taxes were $1,453,000,000. > > > So $100 million was almost 7% of that. > > Hardly a "token". > > And that's what they paid to avoid a suit. How much did Windows XP or 7 bring in? -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-05 23:33 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vlg0vm$1epbu$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683088 |
On 2025-01-05 19:58, Joel Crump wrote: > On 1/5/25 10:47 PM, Alan wrote: >> On 2025-01-05 18:27, Joel wrote: >>> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>> Obviously, DEC weren't happy with the apparent similarity of >>>>>> Windows NT >>>>>> and their product, VMS. In fact, when DEC's engineers noticed the >>>>>> problem, and brought their concern to the senior management, suing >>>>>> Microsoft for intellectual property violation was a possibility. >>>>>> Instead, there was an out of court settlement with Microsoft. >>>>>> As a result, `Affinity for OpenVMS', a scheme to train DEC's >>>>>> technicians >>>>>> and promote NT and OpenVMS as complimentary pieces of a networking >>>>>> solution was announced in summer of 1995. Plus, Microsoft promised to >>>>>> maintain NT support for the DEC Alpha processor and paid DEC up to >>>>>> $100 >>>>>> million. I'd say Bill Gates got off quite lightly.' >>>>> >>>>> "Getting off lightly" in a settlement means plaintiffs gave up their >>>>> butthurt suit, for a small token settlement - M$ had little to lose, >>>>> with it. >>>> >>>> $100 million in the mind '90s was hardly a "token". >>> >>> For an individual, sure, but to M$ as a cost of doing business, likely >>> worth it. >> >> In 1995, Microsoft's net income after taxes were $1,453,000,000. >> >> >> So $100 million was almost 7% of that. >> >> Hardly a "token". >> >> And that's what they paid to avoid a suit. > > > How much did Windows XP or 7 bring in? > I literally just told you what Microsoft net income was at the time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-06 06:31 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <3lfnnjpbg4gh8br44ucbckls88g4t8dnn0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #683092 |
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Obviously, DEC weren't happy with the apparent similarity of >>>>>>> Windows NT >>>>>>> and their product, VMS. In fact, when DEC's engineers noticed the >>>>>>> problem, and brought their concern to the senior management, suing >>>>>>> Microsoft for intellectual property violation was a possibility. >>>>>>> Instead, there was an out of court settlement with Microsoft. >>>>>>> As a result, `Affinity for OpenVMS', a scheme to train DEC's >>>>>>> technicians >>>>>>> and promote NT and OpenVMS as complimentary pieces of a networking >>>>>>> solution was announced in summer of 1995. Plus, Microsoft promised to >>>>>>> maintain NT support for the DEC Alpha processor and paid DEC up to >>>>>>> $100 >>>>>>> million. I'd say Bill Gates got off quite lightly.' >>>>>> >>>>>> "Getting off lightly" in a settlement means plaintiffs gave up their >>>>>> butthurt suit, for a small token settlement - M$ had little to lose, >>>>>> with it. >>>>> >>>>> $100 million in the mind '90s was hardly a "token". >>>> >>>> For an individual, sure, but to M$ as a cost of doing business, likely >>>> worth it. >>> >>> In 1995, Microsoft's net income after taxes were $1,453,000,000. >>> >>> So $100 million was almost 7% of that. >>> >>> Hardly a "token". >>> >>> And that's what they paid to avoid a suit. >> >> How much did Windows XP or 7 bring in? > >I literally just told you what Microsoft net income was at the time. It "literally" is before XP, thus not making the case M$ lost anything, here. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-06 09:42 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vlh4mr$1nndq$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683099 |
On 2025-01-06 03:31, Joel wrote: > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>> Obviously, DEC weren't happy with the apparent similarity of >>>>>>>> Windows NT >>>>>>>> and their product, VMS. In fact, when DEC's engineers noticed the >>>>>>>> problem, and brought their concern to the senior management, suing >>>>>>>> Microsoft for intellectual property violation was a possibility. >>>>>>>> Instead, there was an out of court settlement with Microsoft. >>>>>>>> As a result, `Affinity for OpenVMS', a scheme to train DEC's >>>>>>>> technicians >>>>>>>> and promote NT and OpenVMS as complimentary pieces of a networking >>>>>>>> solution was announced in summer of 1995. Plus, Microsoft promised to >>>>>>>> maintain NT support for the DEC Alpha processor and paid DEC up to >>>>>>>> $100 >>>>>>>> million. I'd say Bill Gates got off quite lightly.' >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Getting off lightly" in a settlement means plaintiffs gave up their >>>>>>> butthurt suit, for a small token settlement - M$ had little to lose, >>>>>>> with it. >>>>>> >>>>>> $100 million in the mind '90s was hardly a "token". >>>>> >>>>> For an individual, sure, but to M$ as a cost of doing business, likely >>>>> worth it. >>>> >>>> In 1995, Microsoft's net income after taxes were $1,453,000,000. >>>> >>>> So $100 million was almost 7% of that. >>>> >>>> Hardly a "token". >>>> >>>> And that's what they paid to avoid a suit. >>> >>> How much did Windows XP or 7 bring in? >> >> I literally just told you what Microsoft net income was at the time. > > > It "literally" is before XP, thus not making the case M$ lost > anything, here. > The subject was whether or not Windows NT copied much of its design and architecture from VMS. It did. It was so obvious that Microsoft paid DEC 7% of what their net income was in 1995 to avoid a lawsuit. 7% of a company's income is NOT a token amount.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-06 13:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <di6onjtphlt0kd0rgh17sivkee4m7d34i3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #683140 |
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> "Getting off lightly" in a settlement means plaintiffs gave up their >>>>>>>> butthurt suit, for a small token settlement - M$ had little to lose, >>>>>>>> with it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> $100 million in the mind '90s was hardly a "token". >>>>>> >>>>>> For an individual, sure, but to M$ as a cost of doing business, likely >>>>>> worth it. >>>>> >>>>> In 1995, Microsoft's net income after taxes were $1,453,000,000. >>>>> >>>>> So $100 million was almost 7% of that. >>>>> >>>>> Hardly a "token". >>>>> >>>>> And that's what they paid to avoid a suit. >>>> >>>> How much did Windows XP or 7 bring in? >>> >>> I literally just told you what Microsoft net income was at the time. >> >> It "literally" is before XP, thus not making the case M$ lost >> anything, here. > >The subject was whether or not Windows NT copied much of its design and >architecture from VMS. > >It did. > >It was so obvious that Microsoft paid DEC 7% of what their net income >was in 1995 to avoid a lawsuit. > >7% of a company's income is NOT a token amount. It's a bit of capital but likely well worth it to avoid the endless process. XP and 7 brought in mad bucks to M$. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-06 10:19 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vlh6qn$1nndr$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683141 |
On 2025-01-06 10:03, Joel wrote: > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> "Getting off lightly" in a settlement means plaintiffs gave up their >>>>>>>>> butthurt suit, for a small token settlement - M$ had little to lose, >>>>>>>>> with it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> $100 million in the mind '90s was hardly a "token". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For an individual, sure, but to M$ as a cost of doing business, likely >>>>>>> worth it. >>>>>> >>>>>> In 1995, Microsoft's net income after taxes were $1,453,000,000. >>>>>> >>>>>> So $100 million was almost 7% of that. >>>>>> >>>>>> Hardly a "token". >>>>>> >>>>>> And that's what they paid to avoid a suit. >>>>> >>>>> How much did Windows XP or 7 bring in? >>>> >>>> I literally just told you what Microsoft net income was at the time. >>> >>> It "literally" is before XP, thus not making the case M$ lost >>> anything, here. >> >> The subject was whether or not Windows NT copied much of its design and >> architecture from VMS. >> >> It did. >> >> It was so obvious that Microsoft paid DEC 7% of what their net income >> was in 1995 to avoid a lawsuit. >> >> 7% of a company's income is NOT a token amount. > > > It's a bit of capital but likely well worth it to avoid the endless > process. XP and 7 brought in mad bucks to M$. Again: irrelevant. A lawsuit is NOT an "endless process" and spending $100 million to avoid one means you didn't like your chances in court.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-06 13:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <0r7onjtchkh2kn3agua29t4ldc21t9rn86@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #683142 |
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> "Getting off lightly" in a settlement means plaintiffs gave up their >>>>>>>>>> butthurt suit, for a small token settlement - M$ had little to lose, >>>>>>>>>> with it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> $100 million in the mind '90s was hardly a "token". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For an individual, sure, but to M$ as a cost of doing business, likely >>>>>>>> worth it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In 1995, Microsoft's net income after taxes were $1,453,000,000. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So $100 million was almost 7% of that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hardly a "token". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And that's what they paid to avoid a suit. >>>>>> >>>>>> How much did Windows XP or 7 bring in? >>>>> >>>>> I literally just told you what Microsoft net income was at the time. >>>> >>>> It "literally" is before XP, thus not making the case M$ lost >>>> anything, here. >>> >>> The subject was whether or not Windows NT copied much of its design and >>> architecture from VMS. >>> >>> It did. >>> >>> It was so obvious that Microsoft paid DEC 7% of what their net income >>> was in 1995 to avoid a lawsuit. >>> >>> 7% of a company's income is NOT a token amount. >> >> It's a bit of capital but likely well worth it to avoid the endless >> process. XP and 7 brought in mad bucks to M$. >Again: irrelevant. > >A lawsuit is NOT an "endless process" and spending $100 million to avoid >one means you didn't like your chances in court. BS, MS would've eventually prevailed, but at what cost? -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-06 10:53 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vlh8s0$1nndr$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683144 |
On 2025-01-06 10:23, Joel wrote: > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> "Getting off lightly" in a settlement means plaintiffs gave up their >>>>>>>>>>> butthurt suit, for a small token settlement - M$ had little to lose, >>>>>>>>>>> with it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> $100 million in the mind '90s was hardly a "token". >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For an individual, sure, but to M$ as a cost of doing business, likely >>>>>>>>> worth it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In 1995, Microsoft's net income after taxes were $1,453,000,000. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So $100 million was almost 7% of that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hardly a "token". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And that's what they paid to avoid a suit. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How much did Windows XP or 7 bring in? >>>>>> >>>>>> I literally just told you what Microsoft net income was at the time. >>>>> >>>>> It "literally" is before XP, thus not making the case M$ lost >>>>> anything, here. >>>> >>>> The subject was whether or not Windows NT copied much of its design and >>>> architecture from VMS. >>>> >>>> It did. >>>> >>>> It was so obvious that Microsoft paid DEC 7% of what their net income >>>> was in 1995 to avoid a lawsuit. >>>> >>>> 7% of a company's income is NOT a token amount. >>> >>> It's a bit of capital but likely well worth it to avoid the endless >>> process. XP and 7 brought in mad bucks to M$. >> Again: irrelevant. >> >> A lawsuit is NOT an "endless process" and spending $100 million to avoid >> one means you didn't like your chances in court. > > > BS, MS would've eventually prevailed, but at what cost? > So they paid $100 million to avoid... ...nothing?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-06 14:17 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <fvaonjhr98at1461h5kn08135hrod15nl6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #683152 |
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>> Microsoft paid DEC 7% of what their net income >>>>> was in 1995 to avoid a lawsuit. >>>>> >>>>> 7% of a company's income is NOT a token amount. >>>> >>>> It's a bit of capital but likely well worth it to avoid the endless >>>> process. XP and 7 brought in mad bucks to M$. >>> Again: irrelevant. >>> >>> A lawsuit is NOT an "endless process" and spending $100 million to avoid >>> one means you didn't like your chances in court. >> >> BS, MS would've eventually prevailed, but at what cost? > >So they paid $100 million to avoid... ...nothing? It's definitely not nothing, it's a drag. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-06 11:23 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vlhajp$1nndq$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683162 |
On 2025-01-06 11:17, Joel wrote: > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: > >>>>>> Microsoft paid DEC 7% of what their net income >>>>>> was in 1995 to avoid a lawsuit. >>>>>> >>>>>> 7% of a company's income is NOT a token amount. >>>>> >>>>> It's a bit of capital but likely well worth it to avoid the endless >>>>> process. XP and 7 brought in mad bucks to M$. >>>> Again: irrelevant. >>>> >>>> A lawsuit is NOT an "endless process" and spending $100 million to avoid >>>> one means you didn't like your chances in court. >>> >>> BS, MS would've eventually prevailed, but at what cost? >> >> So they paid $100 million to avoid... ...nothing? > > > It's definitely not nothing, it's a drag. > Look. Learn to admit when you're wrong. People who actually know about operating systems have pointed out... ...IN DETAIL... ...how Windows NT copied the design and architecture of VMS.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-06 14:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <k0conj10uqm8tc2f22k4ipjq74jsc5ii78@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #683166 |
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>> MS would've eventually prevailed, but at what cost? >>> >>> So they paid $100 million to avoid... ...nothing? >> >> It's definitely not nothing, it's a drag. > >Look. > >Learn to admit when you're wrong. Take that advice, yourself. >People who actually know about operating systems have pointed out... > >...IN DETAIL... > >...how Windows NT copied the design and architecture of VMS. That's not a contradiction of my claim. They didn't copy code. It's unlikely DEC would prove anything infringing, in fact impossible. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 15 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 13 14 [15] 16 17 … 19 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web