Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #351566 > unrolled thread

Snit trying to learn responsive web design

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  Snit trying to learn responsive web design Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 17:52 -0700
    Re: Snit trying to learn responsive web design John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-24 14:22 -0700
      Re: Snit trying to learn responsive web design Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-24 14:27 -0700
        Re: Snit trying to learn responsive web design Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 11:41 -0700
      Awesome! This page is mobile-friendly John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-24 15:04 -0700
        Re: Awesome! This page is mobile-friendly owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-24 22:49 +0000
        Re: Awesome! This page is mobile-friendly "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.invalid> - 2016-04-24 23:11 +0000
          Re: Awesome! This page is mobile-friendly John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-24 16:25 -0700

#351566 — Snit trying to learn responsive web design

http://www.leedgoldstein.com

Before Snit changes it check and see the bottom where it says it was made by his "company".

Do you know what it is not? Made with Dreamweaver! Check the code. Not one Dreamweaver line or comment.

What a piece of shit site but at least it is somewhat responsive, if you count the page being percentage based as "responsive". Google does not.

https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/mobile-friendly/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.leedgoldstein.com

Text too small to read
Mobile viewport not set
Links too close together



Get your shit together Snit!

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#351669

On Saturday, April 23, 2016 at 8:52:19 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote:
> http://www.leedgoldstein.com
> 
> Before Snit changes it check and see the bottom where it says it was made by his "company".
> 
> Do you know what it is not? Made with Dreamweaver! Check the code. Not one Dreamweaver line or comment.
> 
> What a piece of shit site but at least it is somewhat responsive, if you count the page being percentage based as "responsive". Google does not.
> 
> https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/mobile-friendly/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.leedgoldstein.com
> 
> Text too small to read
> Mobile viewport not set
> Links too close together
> 
> 
> 
> Get your shit together Snit!

Awesome! This page is mobile-friendly.

https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/mobile-friendly/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnaturalhealthperspective.com%2Fweb%2Flinux%2F

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#351670

On 4/24/16, 2:22 PM, in article
a4acbbee-d729-41f6-a28b-ce1fdc655e71@googlegroups.com, "John Gohde"
<john.h.gohde@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Saturday, April 23, 2016 at 8:52:19 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> http://www.leedgoldstein.com
>> 
>> Before Snit changes it check and see the bottom where it says it was made by
>> his "company".
>> 
>> Do you know what it is not? Made with Dreamweaver! Check the code. Not one
>> Dreamweaver line or comment.
>> 
>> What a piece of shit site but at least it is somewhat responsive, if you
>> count the page being percentage based as "responsive". Google does not.
>> 
>> https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/mobile-friendly/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww
>> .leedgoldstein.com
>> 
>> Text too small to read
>> Mobile viewport not set
>> Links too close together
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Get your shit together Snit!
> 
> Awesome! This page is mobile-friendly.
> 
> https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/mobile-friendly/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnatu
> ralhealthperspective.com%2Fweb%2Flinux%2F

In the past Carroll has told me that pages / sites of mine which Google
rates as being mobile friendly are not. He did this by viewing pages as they
are viewed on the desktop as opposed to viewing them in mobile view (which
mobile users view automatically).



-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#351798

On Sunday, April 24, 2016 at 3:28:05 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
> On 4/24/16, 2:22 PM, in article
> a4acbbee-d729-41f6-a28b-ce1fdc655e71@googlegroups.com, "John Gohde"
> <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Saturday, April 23, 2016 at 8:52:19 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote:
> >> http://www.leedgoldstein.com
> >> 
> >> Before Snit changes it check and see the bottom where it says it was made by
> >> his "company".
> >> 
> >> Do you know what it is not? Made with Dreamweaver! Check the code. Not one
> >> Dreamweaver line or comment.
> >> 
> >> What a piece of shit site but at least it is somewhat responsive, if you
> >> count the page being percentage based as "responsive". Google does not.
> >> 
> >> https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/mobile-friendly/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww
> >> .leedgoldstein.com
> >> 
> >> Text too small to read
> >> Mobile viewport not set
> >> Links too close together
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Get your shit together Snit!
> > 
> > Awesome! This page is mobile-friendly.
> > 
> > https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/mobile-friendly/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnatu
> > ralhealthperspective.com%2Fweb%2Flinux%2F
> 
> In the past Carroll has told me that pages / sites of mine which Google
> rates as being mobile friendly are not. 

I didn't start this thread, Mr. Forger (as you know) but they aren't quite as "mobile friendly" from Google's perspective as using "Responsive design" is:

"Responsive design is Google's recommended design pattern."

> He did this by viewing pages as they
> are viewed on the desktop as opposed to viewing them in mobile view (which
> mobile users view automatically).

It had a different URL than the desktop version so I didn't need to look (but I did, so you're wrong anyway). The idea of "Responsive design" means it "Serves the same HTML code on the same URL".

https://developers.google.com/webmasters/mobile-sites/mobile-seo/#choose_your_mobile_configuration

How do you know so little about this stuff, Snit? You do know that this...

http://prescottcomputerguy.com/

... is not the same as this...

http://prescottcomputerguy.com/mobile/

... right?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#351672 — Awesome! This page is mobile-friendly

On Sunday, April 24, 2016 at 5:22:07 PM UTC-4, John Gohde wrote:
> On Saturday, April 23, 2016 at 8:52:19 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > http://www.leedgoldstein.com
> > 
> > Before Snit changes it check and see the bottom where it says it was made by his "company".
> > 
> > Do you know what it is not? Made with Dreamweaver! Check the code. Not one Dreamweaver line or comment.
> > 
> > What a piece of shit site but at least it is somewhat responsive, if you count the page being percentage based as "responsive". Google does not.
> > 
> > https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/mobile-friendly/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.leedgoldstein.com
> > 
> > Text too small to read
> > Mobile viewport not set
> > Links too close together
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Get your shit together Snit!
> 
> Awesome! This page is mobile-friendly.
> 
> https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/mobile-friendly/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnaturalhealthperspective.com%2Fweb%2Flinux%2F


This review is awesome! 

I had only made a few more additional changes to my CSS file. I am in the process of making some more major changes to it. It encourages me to put some more effort into it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#351674 — Re: Awesome! This page is mobile-friendly

John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, April 24, 2016 at 5:22:07 PM UTC-4, John Gohde wrote:
>> On Saturday, April 23, 2016 at 8:52:19 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> > http://www.leedgoldstein.com
>> > 
>> > Before Snit changes it check and see the bottom where it says it was made by his "company".
>> > 
>> > Do you know what it is not? Made with Dreamweaver! Check the code. Not one Dreamweaver line or comment.
>> > 
>> > What a piece of shit site but at least it is somewhat responsive, if you count the page being percentage based as "responsive". Google does not.
>> > 
>> > https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/mobile-friendly/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.leedgoldstein.com
>> > 
>> > Text too small to read
>> > Mobile viewport not set
>> > Links too close together
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > Get your shit together Snit!
>> 
>> Awesome! This page is mobile-friendly.
>> 
>> https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/mobile-friendly/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnaturalhealthperspective.com%2Fweb%2Flinux%2F
> 
> 
> This review is awesome! 
> 
> I had only made a few more additional changes to my CSS file. I am in the process of making some more major changes to it. It encourages me to put some more effort into it.

Good job, putz.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#351677 — Re: Awesome! This page is mobile-friendly

John Gohde wrote:

> This review is awesome!

An automated message from Google isn't a review, you putz.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#351679 — Re: Awesome! This page is mobile-friendly

On Sunday, April 24, 2016 at 7:15:08 PM UTC-4, Dr. John Grubor wrote:
> John Gohde wrote:
> 
> > This review is awesome!
> 
> An automated message from Google isn't a review, you putz.


Your NEGATIVITY gives me a good laugh every once and a while.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web