Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #485272 > unrolled thread

OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-01-20 17:20 -0500
    Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-20 23:20 +0000
      Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 00:18 +0000
        Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 16:30 -0800
        Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 16:46 -0800
        Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-01-21 07:16 -0500
          Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 04:59 -0800
          Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 13:31 +0000
            Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-01-26 12:19 -0500
              Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-26 19:46 +0000
                Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-26 19:52 +0000
                  Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-26 23:11 +0000
          Moi enjoys dumping upon pussy whipped RonB, at every possible opportunity Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 05:44 -0800
        Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-22 12:39 -0500
          Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 19:12 +0000
            Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 12:42 -0800
            Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-22 20:05 -0500
              Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-23 01:56 +0000
                Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 18:11 -0800
                Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-23 12:43 -0500
                  Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-23 10:04 -0800
                  Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-23 14:31 -0800
              Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 19:14 -0800
      Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-21 08:19 -0600
      Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-22 12:36 -0500
        Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 10:22 -0800
        Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-01-26 12:21 -0500
          Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-26 17:51 +0000
            Re: OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-01-30 18:58 -0500
    OT: I'm rocking a new 34" widescreen monitor -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-20 15:30 -0800
    Super Wide Screens do come handy in dealing with National Weather Service Forecast Maps. Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 05:42 -0800
      Re: Super Wide Screens do come handy in dealing with National Weather Service Forecast Maps. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 05:46 -0800
    LOL - What a Dumb Fuck!  Snit openingly admits to living on COLA. Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 05:58 -0800
      Re: LOL - What a Dumb Fuck!  Snit openingly admits to living on COLA. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 06:48 -0800
      Re: LOL - What a Dumb Fuck! Snit openingly admits to living on COLA. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-21 15:13 +0000
        Snit wrote it, Snit.  May Moi be so bold as to suggest a brain transplant?  How about the Doorknob solution? Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 07:46 -0800
          Re: Snit wrote it, Snit. May Moi be so bold as to suggest a brain transplant? How about the Doorknob solution? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-21 15:51 +0000
            Nah!  ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is.  Who else but Snit, in person? Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 08:18 -0800
              Re: Nah!  ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is.  Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 08:35 -0800
                Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-21 17:55 +0000
                  Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 11:12 -0800
                Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-01-21 20:11 -0500
                  Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 17:25 -0800
                    Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-01-21 21:18 -0500
                      Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 18:39 -0800
                        Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-01-21 22:02 -0500
                          DFS reminds me of Amanda KoXXX, (Judas) Iscariot, 69 4 me. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-01-22 02:30 -0800
                            Re: DFS reminds me of Amanda KoXXX, (Judas) Iscariot, 69 4 me. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 02:35 -0800
                            Re: DFS reminds me of Amanda KoXXX, (Judas) Iscariot, 69 4 me. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 04:39 -0800
                            Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-01-22 09:23 -0500
                              Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 06:42 -0800
                          Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-22 14:34 -0500
                            Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-01-23 09:33 -0500
                              Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-23 07:24 -0800
                                Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-01-24 09:02 -0500
                                  Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-24 14:11 +0000
                                  Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 08:29 -0800
                                    Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-01-24 12:27 -0500
                                      Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 10:14 -0800
                                      Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-26 13:11 -0800
                                        Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-01-26 21:50 -0500
                                          Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 07:50 -0800
                                            Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-01-27 16:00 +0000
                                              Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 08:10 -0800
                                              Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 08:11 -0800
                                            Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-01-27 12:36 -0500
                                              Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 11:03 -0800
                                                Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-28 06:54 +0000
                                                Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-28 12:19 -0700
                                                Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 20:43 -0800
                                                  Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 01:50 -0700
                                        Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-27 06:02 +0000
                              Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-23 20:37 +0000
                              Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-23 18:24 -0500
                        Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 20:34 -0800
                    Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-22 06:11 +0000
                      Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 22:55 -0800
                  Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-22 06:11 +0000
                    Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 00:29 -0800
    LOL - What a Dumb Fuck!  Snit openingly admits to living on COLA Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 13:21 -0800
      Re: LOL - What a Dumb Fuck!  Snit openingly admits to living on COLA Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 13:47 -0800

Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5  Next page →

#485811

On Wednesday, January 23, 2019 at 10:43:09 AM UTC-7, silverslimer wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 01:56:05 -0000 (UTC), RonB
> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >On 2019-01-23, silverslimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 19:12:35 -0000 (UTC), RonB
> >><ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>On 2019-01-22, silverslimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:18:01 -0000 (UTC), RonB
> >>>><ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>On 2019-01-20, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> My wife gave it to me for Christmas.
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> https://www.amazon.com/LG-34WK650-W-34-UltraWide-21/dp/B078GSH1LV
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> Right now streaming the NFC conference game on left half of screen, and 
> >>>>>>> cola on right half.
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> Recommended res is 2560x1080.  Can fit two good sized spreadsheets 
> >>>>>>> onscreen at once, or two browser pages.
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> Nice!
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_agRSPhmDbo/hqdefault.jpg
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Was this the game the cheating NFL gave to the cheating Rams? Looks like the 
> >>>>>spent a lot of money on players and graft. Gee, I wonder why people are 
> >>>>>leaving the NFL in droves? Rams vs Patriots in the Cheater Bowl. Guess who 
> >>>>>WON'T be watching. This pass interference non-call was even worse than the 
> >>>>>non-call for face-masking on Nick Foles. So, what exactly are the NFL refs 
> >>>>>supposedly looking at when they miss these obvious calls? Did a bird fly 
> >>>>>overhead and they forget they were at a game? Unbelievable.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>I didn't even watch the game, just saw that the game was "controversial" and 
> >>>>>then watched the video. Yeah, I would say it was "controversial." Actually I 
> >>>>>would say the fix was in. Money talks and apparently the Rams talked LOUD to 
> >>>>>the NFL.
> >>>>
> >>>> I try to watch soccer and genuinely like the sport but am realizing
> >>>> that I care less and less about sports, even if a local team is
> >>>> involved in some way. I get more enjoyment from watching my cousin
> >>>> play in his shitty amateur team than a professional one. That said, I
> >>>> occasionally enjoy watching men beat the crap out of one another in
> >>>> Bellator. 
> >>>
> >>>I should ignore sports also. So much of it is rigged now. The L.A. Rams 
> >>>spent a fortune for players, they're in a new market and the NFL has been 
> >>>biased toward them all year. This was just such unbelievably obvious 
> >>>cheating that it was pretty hard to swallow. I quit watching football a few 
> >>>years ago but, unfortunately for me, I still look at the results and the 
> >>>highlights. Once I break that habit I'll be a lot happier.
> >>
> >> Tell yourself that much of these sports exist primarily to distract us
> >> from all of the bullshit politicians do. It's easy to pass unfair
> >> bills and laws if the Super Bowl is there to distract everyone from
> >> the news.
> >
> >Like the Romans' "bread and circuses." Now it's welfare and sports.
> 
> Beautifully said. It's the reason why people would benefit from
> completely ignoring mainstream sports and taking more of an interest
> in local ones if it is absolutely necessary for them to watch
> athletics. Go check out your local neighbourhood high school team or
> cheer on your family member at college since that, at least,
> accomplishes something in giving much needed support to a person of
> some worth.
> 
> One of the things that always bothered me about how people refer to
> mainstream sports is that they include themselves in the achievements
> of well-compensated strangers playing for their local team. A New
> Yorker will say "we won" when the Knicks win an important game but you
> have to wonder what that person actually did. I suppose that's why
> some people like sports more than others; a feeling of involvement.
> All I can say is that when the Montreal Canadiens or the Montreal
> Impact win something, I get nothing out of them and therefore don't
> care more than I should.



Those who know my posts knows the flood bot is not written in the manner Klaus Schadenfreude is saying, and most of them are simply manually written. bigdog wants to hurt us: If he and his shills can't play here then no one will. 

Oh goodness, that is just tons of malarky. 

At one point, bigdog said a usenet denizen was "obsessing" over him, which was defined as him posting to himself. 



-- 
Eight things to never feed your cat!!
http://www.5z8.info/dont-just-drizzle_y8q4ut_5waystokillwithamelon
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.os.linux.advocacy/tzMH39QmAmU
https://youtu.be/TETJEkaUoY4
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#485849

On Wednesday, January 23, 2019 at 10:43:09 AM UTC-7, silverslimer wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 01:56:05 -0000 (UTC), RonB
> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >On 2019-01-23, silverslimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 19:12:35 -0000 (UTC), RonB
> >><ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>On 2019-01-22, silverslimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:18:01 -0000 (UTC), RonB
> >>>><ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>On 2019-01-20, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> My wife gave it to me for Christmas.
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> https://www.amazon.com/LG-34WK650-W-34-UltraWide-21/dp/B078GSH1LV
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> Right now streaming the NFC conference game on left half of screen, and 
> >>>>>>> cola on right half.
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> Recommended res is 2560x1080.  Can fit two good sized spreadsheets 
> >>>>>>> onscreen at once, or two browser pages.
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> Nice!
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_agRSPhmDbo/hqdefault.jpg
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Was this the game the cheating NFL gave to the cheating Rams? Looks like the 
> >>>>>spent a lot of money on players and graft. Gee, I wonder why people are 
> >>>>>leaving the NFL in droves? Rams vs Patriots in the Cheater Bowl. Guess who 
> >>>>>WON'T be watching. This pass interference non-call was even worse than the 
> >>>>>non-call for face-masking on Nick Foles. So, what exactly are the NFL refs 
> >>>>>supposedly looking at when they miss these obvious calls? Did a bird fly 
> >>>>>overhead and they forget they were at a game? Unbelievable.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>I didn't even watch the game, just saw that the game was "controversial" and 
> >>>>>then watched the video. Yeah, I would say it was "controversial." Actually I 
> >>>>>would say the fix was in. Money talks and apparently the Rams talked LOUD to 
> >>>>>the NFL.
> >>>>
> >>>> I try to watch soccer and genuinely like the sport but am realizing
> >>>> that I care less and less about sports, even if a local team is
> >>>> involved in some way. I get more enjoyment from watching my cousin
> >>>> play in his shitty amateur team than a professional one. That said, I
> >>>> occasionally enjoy watching men beat the crap out of one another in
> >>>> Bellator. 
> >>>
> >>>I should ignore sports also. So much of it is rigged now. The L.A. Rams 
> >>>spent a fortune for players, they're in a new market and the NFL has been 
> >>>biased toward them all year. This was just such unbelievably obvious 
> >>>cheating that it was pretty hard to swallow. I quit watching football a few 
> >>>years ago but, unfortunately for me, I still look at the results and the 
> >>>highlights. Once I break that habit I'll be a lot happier.
> >>
> >> Tell yourself that much of these sports exist primarily to distract us
> >> from all of the bullshit politicians do. It's easy to pass unfair
> >> bills and laws if the Super Bowl is there to distract everyone from
> >> the news.
> >
> >Like the Romans' "bread and circuses." Now it's welfare and sports.
> 
> Beautifully said. It's the reason why people would benefit from
> completely ignoring mainstream sports and taking more of an interest
> in local ones if it is absolutely necessary for them to watch
> athletics. Go check out your local neighbourhood high school team or
> cheer on your family member at college since that, at least,
> accomplishes something in giving much needed support to a person of
> some worth.
> 
> One of the things that always bothered me about how people refer to
> mainstream sports is that they include themselves in the achievements
> of well-compensated strangers playing for their local team. A New
> Yorker will say "we won" when the Knicks win an important game but you
> have to wonder what that person actually did. I suppose that's why
> some people like sports more than others; a feeling of involvement.
> All I can say is that when the Montreal Canadiens or the Montreal
> Impact win something, I get nothing out of them and therefore don't
> care more than I should.



A constant, fierce, posting itch, regardless of content - basically slippery snake prostitutes, and satisfactorily-waxed fish, tied up with ropes for his own personal purposes. Klaus Schadenfreude would never deny the flooder is John 'The Flooder' Gohde, who is a demonstrable C developer but I don't know if it could be used to automate this. John 'The Flooder' Gohde and the other trolls imply Googling for a suggestion for a FOSS application is attacking. 

John 'The Flooder' Gohde can't get anything else to work, either. Now that nobody is speaking to John 'The Flooder' Gohde, he's making it sound like he's broken LibreOffice -- when in fact, people are just finally wisening up to his crap. John 'The Flooder' Gohde and Klaus Schadenfreude both lie nonstop and outrageously and continue to do so. So no motivation in showing any further care or restraint. 

--
What Every Entrepreneur Must Know
http://www.5z8.info/dont-just-drizzle_y8q4ut_5waystokillwithamelon
https://youtu.be/TETJEkaUoY4
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#485734

On Tuesday, January 22, 2019 at 6:05:23 PM UTC-7, silverslimer wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 19:12:35 -0000 (UTC), RonB
> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >On 2019-01-22, silverslimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:18:01 -0000 (UTC), RonB
> >><ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>On 2019-01-20, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
> >>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> >>>>> My wife gave it to me for Christmas.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> https://www.amazon.com/LG-34WK650-W-34-UltraWide-21/dp/B078GSH1LV
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Right now streaming the NFC conference game on left half of screen, and 
> >>>>> cola on right half.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Recommended res is 2560x1080.  Can fit two good sized spreadsheets 
> >>>>> onscreen at once, or two browser pages.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Nice!
> >>>>> 
> >>>>
> >>>> https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_agRSPhmDbo/hqdefault.jpg
> >>>
> >>>Was this the game the cheating NFL gave to the cheating Rams? Looks like the 
> >>>spent a lot of money on players and graft. Gee, I wonder why people are 
> >>>leaving the NFL in droves? Rams vs Patriots in the Cheater Bowl. Guess who 
> >>>WON'T be watching. This pass interference non-call was even worse than the 
> >>>non-call for face-masking on Nick Foles. So, what exactly are the NFL refs 
> >>>supposedly looking at when they miss these obvious calls? Did a bird fly 
> >>>overhead and they forget they were at a game? Unbelievable.
> >>>
> >>>I didn't even watch the game, just saw that the game was "controversial" and 
> >>>then watched the video. Yeah, I would say it was "controversial." Actually I 
> >>>would say the fix was in. Money talks and apparently the Rams talked LOUD to 
> >>>the NFL.
> >>
> >> I try to watch soccer and genuinely like the sport but am realizing
> >> that I care less and less about sports, even if a local team is
> >> involved in some way. I get more enjoyment from watching my cousin
> >> play in his shitty amateur team than a professional one. That said, I
> >> occasionally enjoy watching men beat the crap out of one another in
> >> Bellator. 
> >
> >I should ignore sports also. So much of it is rigged now. The L.A. Rams 
> >spent a fortune for players, they're in a new market and the NFL has been 
> >biased toward them all year. This was just such unbelievably obvious 
> >cheating that it was pretty hard to swallow. I quit watching football a few 
> >years ago but, unfortunately for me, I still look at the results and the 
> >highlights. Once I break that habit I'll be a lot happier.
> 
> Tell yourself that much of these sports exist primarily to distract us
> from all of the bullshit politicians do. It's easy to pass unfair
> bills and laws if the Super Bowl is there to distract everyone from
> the news.



Carroll, 4/10/2015 4:04 PM:
    -----
    Cute trick... To the guy who hacked my Google account.
    -----
No details. Seems to treat it as a joke.

Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:02 PM, <https://goo.gl/51rsmZ>:
    -----
    Email Hacking Is A Serious Crime
    -----    
No longer "cute"... now it is a serious crime. OK.

Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:07 PM:
By now he is posting more links to how serious this crime against him is.

Carroll, 4/10/2015 7:25 PM:
    -----
    I didn't write that.
    -----
Now he is denying the posts from his own account. OK, he was "hacked". Someone else posted this. Hard to hack a gmail account given how they use two-step authentication and someone would need access to his phone or the like... but at least POSSIBLE. 

Even then, though, if someone tries to guess your password Google alerts you and lets you know what IP address and other info. I know because someone in a Denver internet cafe has tried mine on several occasions.

Google even forces you to change your password when this happens. Very hard to hack these days. 

So already Carroll's story is unlikely. 

But let us accept it... someone somehow hacked his account bypassing the two step verification. This person did not, however, change his password and Carroll posted within an hour of the "hacker". Before that, unless he is an idiot, he changed his password and the "hacker" was locked out. The "hacker" got one post in. 

But Carroll could not leave his story there.

Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:36 PM, <https://goo.gl/NJ2bMH>:
    -----
    Someone hacked my fretwizzer gmail acct so, for the time being,
    don't trust anything from it.
    -----
Wait. What? Even after Carroll figured out this "hacker" who was too stupid to change his password had broken into his account and Carroll *surely* must have changed his own password, he is saying the "hacker" might still have access. Might be able to break Google's two-step verification process *again*. 

This is *very* unlikely... to the point of being unbelievable. 

Even worse for him: he notes which of his accounts he is claiming was hacked - but in the past he has denied even using the other accounts! LOL! He screwed up and made it very clear he has multiple accounts and felt the need to note which one. He made the same mistake in the next quote where he speaks of WHICH of his gmail accounts he is claiming was hacked. Oops! If he only posts with one there would be no need to specify which one!

He has completely screwed up in his game to pretend he posts with only one gmail account. Completely idiotic of him, too!

Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:38 PM, <https://goo.gl/YA7gMO>:
    -----
    Some mentally deficient child hacked my 'fretwizzer' gmail account
    so I may have to kill it. For the time being, don't assume
    anything that's coming from it was written by me.
    -----
He is still saying that he may have to kill the account instead of just changing the password which anyone with half a brain would have already done (and Google *forces* you to do when someone even tries to hack your account... I know because someone in the Denver area has tried to hack mine multiple times... likely Carroll but I have no proof of this). And he specifies WHICH of his accounts! He is directly admitting he uses more than one account! His claim of being "forged" with his second account is a lie. Proved.

Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:40 PM, <https://goo.gl/j6yCuV>:
    -----
    Looks like it's still being hacked despite me taking precautions,
    I may have to kill the account.
    -----
What makes it look like its still being hacked? And what precautions other than changing the two-step verification options does he need? And how would someone bypass this... is he really on the NSA watch list? Seems you would need someone at that level to be doing this. He watches too much TV where they computer hackers spend thirty seconds and bypass all security.

Just nonsense.

Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:05 PM:
    -----
    Apparently Google is having issues with their accounts to the
    point where they're ready to undertake some additional measures.
    -----
But, of course, no evidence of this... and what measures? They already alert users if someone else tries to guess your password and use two-step authentication and even force you to make a new password if it seems someone is trying to hack you.
    -----
    They're now involving several federal agencies in things they
    didn't bother with previously in an effort to deal with people who
    hack into accounts. They've asked me to leave the account open.
    -----
So now Google is letting Carroll know how they are handling these things - and asking him to leave a *hacked* account open... one someone can be using to steal his identity. No. This does not pass the sniff test in any way. Even if they were doing this for some bizarre sting operation, which is in itself far fetched, they would have told Carroll to not make it public information so the hacker would not know.

Just insanity. His own story is so idiotic and full of idiotic claims it simply cannot be true. Carroll uses his secondary Google account - the one he accesses via Tor and is referred to as his Tor account - to have plausible deniability for things he says there. Now he is working to do the same thing with his main account. Maybe Carroll read a report like this: <http://cnnmon.ie/111QeT8> [money.com]. If so he missed the part where they note if you are *really* hacked, which is rare, the hackers change your password and lock you out. Why would they not?
    -----
    There's some new legislation that will help them deal with this
    issue... which probably means more BS for us ;)
    -----
Yes, new legislation to make sure Carroll does not have to deal with "hackers" and "forgers" which do not even exist. 

The funny part is, this happened shortly after someone in the Denver area, likely Carroll, tried to guess *my* passwords and they did it from an Internet café (Google tells you the IP and that can be used to trace back). 

My guess: Carroll is the one who was working to guess my password and figured this new lie of his was a good way to deny his own words even more than he does with his Tor account *and* a way to make it so if I had talked about him trying to hack my account he could say I was just copying his comments. "Proving" I read his posts... which for now I am to see how absurd his lies are. :)

Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:25 PM:
    -----
    The person who hacked into my Gmail acct. changed the wording on
    this post. I've removed the others but Google asked me to leave
    one standing for some odd reason. 
    -----
Here Carroll claims the hacker changed the wording on a post of his from *before* he had even claimed he was hacked. So this hacker not only can *post* for him but edit his old Usenet posts.

I call utter bullshit on this. Out and out lie from Carroll. And then Carroll says Google asked him to not delete these "hacked" posts... this is nonsense. Why would Google want him to leave forged posts in the public and why would Google not just keep their own copy? Even Carroll notes it is for "some odd reason" - yeah, because Carroll is telling stories that make *no* sense at all.

Carroll is lying. Maybe there is some kernel of truth to his stories? Even if so - and frankly it is unlikely he will ever show any evidence to back his claims - the details he is posting are absurd.

Carroll, 4/11/2015 2:10 PM:
    -----
    And he's so high he thinks people still have to manually enter all
    their passwords in whenever they want to use anything that's been
    password protected ;)
    -----
Nobody had suggested, hinted, implied, or said anything like what Carroll says they did.

Maybe his story will be someone stole his laptop (or mobile device) and he had his passwords saved? If so why not have the device deactivated remotely? Why has he not said anything about this? 

My guess: he realizes he screwed up when trying to guess my passwords and is now building a story so he can say his computer was stolen and it was not him. Or, LOL, maybe someone broke into his house and did it. 

This unknown hacker knew he was obsessed with me and carried on acting like him. Makes complete sense, eh?

Carroll, 4/12/2015 8:45 AM, <https://goo.gl/KMf4pa>:
    -----
    The first one, that has since been deleted. My bad for having such
    a feeble password on this account.
    -----
Now he suggests it was merely from someone guessing his password - which contradicts his above insinuations that it could have been from a saved password on a device he had.

His story changes with the telling.

But as noted, when someone tries to guess your password Google has ways to deal with it. I know - Carroll or someone in his neck of the woods recently tried it with me.

Carroll, 4/12/2015 9:29 AM:
    -----
    The account in question here is a gmail account. Contrary to
    Snit's delusions, I have no idea what a TOR account looks like but
    it's a good bet it doesn't bear much of a resemblance to a gmail
    account. 
    -----
Here Carroll plays stupid and pretends that if when he or anyone uses the Tor browser *Carroll* pointed to this somehow changes the way the gmail interface looks. Um, no. Worse it might do is make Google think you are in another country and you would have to set it back to English. But the basic look stays the same.

He is playing stupid and pretending to not know how the Tor browser he pointed to works. Just idiotic of him.
    -----
    That idiocy aside, I love how Snit has repeatedly, for years, 
    feigned ignorance about gmail accounts, yet, he keeps disclosing
    info that proves he knows about them. Some fools do stuff like
    this when they believe people are as stupid as the fool needs them
    to be ;)
    -----
I do not think Google would allow you to edit your Usenet / groups posts but I do not use it much and do not know for sure. Seems absurd that they would... and others have now said they do not. But given how I do not use Google Groups for posting why would I know the details of their system for certain? 

Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:47 PM:
    -----
    Your obsession with me is insane. Working with Google I now have
    proof you and ebot worked together to hack me. Clever. If I press
    charges against you I have to also include her so you remain safe
    for now.

    Do not think this is over.
    -----
    
No evidence of working with Google on this (and all out and out lies). Carroll is making public threats based on lies. 

Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:50 PM:
    -----
    I promised COLA your trolling days were over so you contacted ebot
    and worked with her to hack my account. I might not be able to get
    your ass handed to you in court over this but wait until your boss
    at Yavapai College contacts you.

    Maybe you should make that call first. Ask about your comments on
    incest.

    See if those can not be quoted.
    -----
    
Direct lies and threats by Carroll.

Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:51 PM:
    -----
    You went too far this time Snit. We have trolled each other for
    years but to contact ebot and get her to help you hack my account
    was over a line.
    -----
    
A complete and utter lie from Carroll. 

Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:52 PM:
    -----
    The above post is Snit hacking my account.
    -----
A complete and utter lie... more false accusations from him.

Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:53 PM:
    -----
    You edited those posts when you hacked my account. Do not trust
    anything from my fretwizzer account now that Snit and ebot have
    access to it.
    -----
More unsupported claims and attacks by Carroll.

Carroll, 4/16/2015 8:56 PM:
    -----
    Working with Google I now have proof Snit and ebot hacked the
    account. Many of the older posts were edited. You can see evidence
    of this by Snit pointing to "old" posts which have been modified to
    say I claimed I was his "personal newsgroup rapist", a phrase I
    have never used.
    -----
    
No evidence of Carroll working with Google. No evidence of any older posts being edited.

--
Puppy Videos
https://youtu.be/UkAyrfOZaXc
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#485364

> some dumb fsck wrote:
>>
>> https://www.amazon.com/LG-34WK650-W-34-UltraWide-21/dp/B078GSH1LV
>> 
>> Recommended res is 2560x1080.  Can fit two good sized spreadsheets 
>> onscreen at once, or two browser pages.

Only 1080 vertical?  Ish.  I had 1024 vertical, 25 fsckng years ago.

-- 
"Huh?  [Bit rot] also affects Linux you puffed up little suck up."  -
"True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#485647

On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 23:20:53 +0000 (UTC), owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
wrote:

>DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>> My wife gave it to me for Christmas.
>> 
>> https://www.amazon.com/LG-34WK650-W-34-UltraWide-21/dp/B078GSH1LV
>> 
>> Right now streaming the NFC conference game on left half of screen, and 
>> cola on right half.
>> 
>> Recommended res is 2560x1080.  Can fit two good sized spreadsheets 
>> onscreen at once, or two browser pages.
>> 
>> Nice!
>> 
>
>https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_agRSPhmDbo/hqdefault.jpg

Inbreeding.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#485654

On Tuesday, January 22, 2019 at 10:36:44 AM UTC-7, silverslimer wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 23:20:53 +0000 (UTC), owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
> wrote:
> 
> >DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> >> My wife gave it to me for Christmas.
> >> 
> >> https://www.amazon.com/LG-34WK650-W-34-UltraWide-21/dp/B078GSH1LV
> >> 
> >> Right now streaming the NFC conference game on left half of screen, and 
> >> cola on right half.
> >> 
> >> Recommended res is 2560x1080.  Can fit two good sized spreadsheets 
> >> onscreen at once, or two browser pages.
> >> 
> >> Nice!
> >> 
> >
> >https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_agRSPhmDbo/hqdefault.jpg
> 
> Inbreeding.



The Mac has more integrated tools. 

No one here has ever read my script, much less found a bug; still, in the back of my mind, I'm thinking, "bigdog could do this better". I am more honest with myself than Sandman, AKA Jonas Eklundh is. This forum is a septic tank. 

What bigdog does is certainly more productive. 

Like most everyone else in the world, Sandman, AKA Jonas Eklundh relies on mainstream media to blindly inform his positions on the news. Ergo, he only knows and accepts the authenticated claims which also happens to be the ones which characterize conspiracy theories in a very hopeful and ethical way. It was Sandman, AKA Jonas Eklundh who forged me and admitted to having done so. 

But Sandman, AKA Jonas Eklundh feels the need to please the herd. So be it. Wow! How did Sandman, AKA Jonas Eklundh get so egotistical he concludes everything is about him?? 



-- 
What Every Entrepreneur Must Know!!
https://youtu.be/IhOfBmWwCVY
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#486019

silverslimer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 23:20:53 +0000 (UTC), owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>>DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>> My wife gave it to me for Christmas.
>>> 
>>> https://www.amazon.com/LG-34WK650-W-34-UltraWide-21/dp/B078GSH1LV
>>> 
>>> Right now streaming the NFC conference game on left half of screen, and 
>>> cola on right half.
>>> 
>>> Recommended res is 2560x1080.  Can fit two good sized spreadsheets 
>>> onscreen at once, or two browser pages.
>>> 
>>> Nice!
>>> 
>>
>>https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_agRSPhmDbo/hqdefault.jpg
>
> Inbreeding.

You bastards!

Besides, you can post pix of "white" inbreeding as well, or of genetic
defects.


-- 
A visit to a strange place will bring fresh work.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#486020

Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
> silverslimer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> 
>> On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 23:20:53 +0000 (UTC), owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>> My wife gave it to me for Christmas.
>>>> 
>>>> https://www.amazon.com/LG-34WK650-W-34-UltraWide-21/dp/B078GSH1LV
>>>> 
>>>> Right now streaming the NFC conference game on left half of screen, and 
>>>> cola on right half.
>>>> 
>>>> Recommended res is 2560x1080.  Can fit two good sized spreadsheets 
>>>> onscreen at once, or two browser pages.
>>>> 
>>>> Nice!
>>>> 
>>>
>>>https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_agRSPhmDbo/hqdefault.jpg
>>
>> Inbreeding.
> 
> You bastards!
> 
> Besides, you can post pix of "white" inbreeding as well, or of genetic
> defects.
> 

Why are you making this about race?  It's about eye-separation
compatability for ultrawide monitors.  Not everybody can benefit
from one.
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#486181

owl wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>> silverslimer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>> 
>>> On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 23:20:53 +0000 (UTC), owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>>> My wife gave it to me for Christmas.
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://www.amazon.com/LG-34WK650-W-34-UltraWide-21/dp/B078GSH1LV
>>>>> 
>>>>> Right now streaming the NFC conference game on left half of screen, and 
>>>>> cola on right half.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Recommended res is 2560x1080.  Can fit two good sized spreadsheets 
>>>>> onscreen at once, or two browser pages.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Nice!
>>>>> 
>>>>
>>>>https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_agRSPhmDbo/hqdefault.jpg
>>>
>>> Inbreeding.
>> 
>> You bastards!
>> 
>> Besides, you can post pix of "white" inbreeding as well, or of genetic
>> defects.
>
> Why are you making this about race?  It's about eye-separation
> compatability for ultrawide monitors.  Not everybody can benefit
> from one.

<rolls eyes>

You are an intelligent creep.


-- 
Is this really happening?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#485287

Reminds me...

We’ve been talking at work (half seriously) about hooking up a new 
system up to watch the Super Bowl on... roughly 10ft tall and 40 wide.
Only problem is that the new 4K projectors aren’t in yet...later this year.


-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#485352 — Super Wide Screens do come handy in dealing with National Weather Service Forecast Maps.

On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 5:19:28 PM UTC-5, DFS wrote:
> My wife gave it to me for Christmas.
> 
> https://www.amazon.com/LG-34WK650-W-34-UltraWide-21/dp/B078GSH1LV
> 
> Right now streaming the NFC conference game on left half of screen, and 
> cola on right half.
> 
> Recommended res is 2560x1080.  Can fit two good sized spreadsheets 
> onscreen at once, or two browser pages.
> 
> Nice!



Super Wide Screens do come handy in dealing with National Weather Service Forecast Maps. Other than that, I will gladly stick with a normal size screen.  Why junk my desk up with two different monitors?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#485355 — Re: Super Wide Screens do come handy in dealing with National Weather Service Forecast Maps.

On Monday, January 21, 2019 at 6:42:35 AM UTC-7, Simon bar Sinister wrote:
> On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 5:19:28 PM UTC-5, DFS wrote:
> > My wife gave it to me for Christmas.
> > 
> > https://www.amazon.com/LG-34WK650-W-34-UltraWide-21/dp/B078GSH1LV
> > 
> > Right now streaming the NFC conference game on left half of screen, and 
> > cola on right half.
> > 
> > Recommended res is 2560x1080.  Can fit two good sized spreadsheets 
> > onscreen at once, or two browser pages.
> > 
> > Nice!
> 
> 
> 
> Super Wide Screens do come handy in dealing with National Weather Service Forecast Maps. Other than that, I will gladly stick with a normal size screen.  Why junk my desk up with two different monitors?



Habits change. Could be the concept of a usenet group is getting outdated. Ha, ha, ha! 

A shadow of cognition, projected by Just Wondering, at the wrong time. 

--
Best CMS Solution of 2017!
http://www.5z8.info/nic_cage_naked_y8b5qk_torrentEverything
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#485358 — LOL - What a Dumb Fuck! Snit openingly admits to living on COLA.

On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 5:19:28 PM UTC-5, Snit wrote:
> 
> Right now streaming the NFC conference game on left half of screen, and 
> cola on right half.




LOL - What a Dumb Fuck!  Snit openingly admits to living on COLA.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#485370 — Re: LOL - What a Dumb Fuck! Snit openingly admits to living on COLA.

On Monday, January 21, 2019 at 6:58:21 AM UTC-7, Simon bar Sinister wrote:
> On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 5:19:28 PM UTC-5, Snit wrote:
> > 
> > Right now streaming the NFC conference game on left half of screen, and 
> > cola on right half.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> LOL - What a Dumb Fuck!  Snit openingly admits to living on COLA.



bigdog can't get anything else to work, either. 

Your system will crawl while this takes place. Frankly I do not really think you understand. Time to blame the Russians! 

bigdog is the outcome of the truth that Liberals have been hired to be in charge of schooling the next generation. It is not an accident that he is a stupid atheist. Just look at bigdog's posts and look at mine, there is nothing for me to learn from a jerk like bigdog. But knock yourself out, let him keep making a blockhead of himself. It is not like anyone believes him. 

Both of those guys get their enjoyment out of eliciting annoyed replies to their attacks, which is the very definition of a troll. Already moved on from that. Keep up! 



--
Curious how these posts are made? Email: fretwizzer@gmail.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#485375 — Re: LOL - What a Dumb Fuck! Snit openingly admits to living on COLA.

Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 5:19:28 PM UTC-5, Snit wrote:
>> 
>> Right now streaming the NFC conference game on left half of screen, and 
>> cola on right half.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> LOL - What a Dumb Fuck!  Snit openingly admits to living on COLA.
> 

I did not write that. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#485386 — Snit wrote it, Snit. May Moi be so bold as to suggest a brain transplant? How about the Doorknob solution?

On Monday, January 21, 2019 at 10:13:44 AM UTC-5, Snit wrote:
> Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 5:19:28 PM UTC-5, Snit wrote:
> >> 
> >> Right now streaming the NFC conference game on left half of screen, and 
> >> cola on right half.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > LOL - What a Dumb Fuck!  Snit openingly admits to living on COLA.
> > 
> 
> I did not write that.




Snit wrote it, Snit.  May Moi be so bold as to suggest a brain transplant?  How about the Doorknob solution?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#485390 — Re: Snit wrote it, Snit. May Moi be so bold as to suggest a brain transplant? How about the Doorknob solution?

Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, January 21, 2019 at 10:13:44 AM UTC-5, Snit wrote:
>> Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 5:19:28 PM UTC-5, Snit wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Right now streaming the NFC conference game on left half of screen, and 
>>>> cola on right half.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> LOL - What a Dumb Fuck!  Snit openingly admits to living on COLA.
>>> 
>> 
>> I did not write that.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Snit wrote it, Snit.  May Moi be so bold as to suggest a brain
> transplant?  How about the Doorknob solution?
> 
> 

The old everyone is Snit gag. Got it. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#485401 — Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person?

On Monday, January 21, 2019 at 10:51:21 AM UTC-5, Snit wrote:
> Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Monday, January 21, 2019 at 10:13:44 AM UTC-5, Snit wrote:
> >> Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 5:19:28 PM UTC-5, Snit wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>> Right now streaming the NFC conference game on left half of screen, and 
> >>>> cola on right half.
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> LOL - What a Dumb Fuck!  Snit openingly admits to living on COLA.
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> I did not write that.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Snit wrote it, Snit.  May Moi be so bold as to suggest a brain
> > transplant?  How about the Doorknob solution?
> > 
> > 
> 
> The old everyone is Snit gag. Got it.




Nah!  ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is.  Who else but Snit, in person?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#485405 — Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person?

On Monday, January 21, 2019 at 9:18:23 AM UTC-7, Simon bar Sinister wrote:
> On Monday, January 21, 2019 at 10:51:21 AM UTC-5, Snit wrote:
> > Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Monday, January 21, 2019 at 10:13:44 AM UTC-5, Snit wrote:
> > >> Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>> On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 5:19:28 PM UTC-5, Snit wrote:
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> Right now streaming the NFC conference game on left half of screen, and 
> > >>>> cola on right half.
> > >>> 
> > >>> 
> > >>> 
> > >>> 
> > >>> LOL - What a Dumb Fuck!  Snit openingly admits to living on COLA.
> > >>> 
> > >> 
> > >> I did not write that.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Snit wrote it, Snit.  May Moi be so bold as to suggest a brain
> > > transplant?  How about the Doorknob solution?
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > The old everyone is Snit gag. Got it.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Nah!  ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is.  Who else but Snit, in person?

The battle of the meds!  In the 'red' (communist) corner,
standing in a puddle of piss with a snot bubble in his nose,
we have Crackatoa Cratek weighing in at 3lbs. of Lexapro
boasting a record of 12 counts of fraud, 16 audits and stint 
in a psychiatric facility for the criminally insane. In the 'blue' 
(poor circulation) corner, weighing in at  just over 500,000
IU of various vitamin D compounds, we have John 'Toxicity' 
Godhe with a record of...  (crowd loudly cheers Godhe)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#485428 — Re: Nah! ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is. Who else but Snit, in person?

Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, January 21, 2019 at 9:18:23 AM UTC-7, Simon bar Sinister wrote:
>> On Monday, January 21, 2019 at 10:51:21 AM UTC-5, Snit wrote:
>>> Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Monday, January 21, 2019 at 10:13:44 AM UTC-5, Snit wrote:
>>>>> Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 5:19:28 PM UTC-5, Snit wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Right now streaming the NFC conference game on left half of screen, and 
>>>>>>> cola on right half.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> LOL - What a Dumb Fuck!  Snit openingly admits to living on COLA.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I did not write that.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Snit wrote it, Snit.  May Moi be so bold as to suggest a brain
>>>> transplant?  How about the Doorknob solution?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> The old everyone is Snit gag. Got it.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Nah!  ONLY one person is as dumb as Snit is.  Who else but Snit, in person?
> 
> The battle of the meds!  In the 'red' (communist) corner,
> standing in a puddle of piss with a snot bubble in his nose,
> we have Crackatoa Cratek weighing in at 3lbs. of Lexapro
> boasting a record of 12 counts of fraud, 16 audits and stint 
> in a psychiatric facility for the criminally insane. In the 'blue' 
> (poor circulation) corner, weighing in at  just over 500,000
> IU of various vitamin D compounds, we have John 'Toxicity' 
> Godhe with a record of...  (crowd loudly cheers Godhe)
> 

Interesting how you word that so carefully in case your family or the
police see it. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web