Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #328955 > unrolled thread
| Started by | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-27 21:55 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-10-28 00:18 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 194 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-10-27 21:55 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 15:16 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-27 22:16 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 15:32 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-10-27 22:36 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 15:45 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-27 23:21 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-27 20:07 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 00:34 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 17:41 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-28 01:49 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 17:56 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 08:47 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 08:50 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 13:36 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 10:50 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 14:22 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 11:48 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 17:13 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 14:21 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 00:57 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 08:49 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 08:52 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 16:06 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 09:17 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 09:53 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 14:07 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 13:37 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 10:46 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 04:36 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-28 00:48 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 09:01 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 09:04 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 08:44 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 08:47 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-28 11:27 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 02:35 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 20:06 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-29 05:11 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 10:11 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 15:39 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-29 12:11 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 12:28 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-29 12:30 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 09:49 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 11:25 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 09:52 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 17:01 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 13:23 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 12:05 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 11:30 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 20:37 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 17:20 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 21:53 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 01:18 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 01:58 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 02:32 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 05:16 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 09:04 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-30 09:42 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 17:03 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 17:27 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 13:28 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 15:32 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 09:06 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 20:25 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 14:16 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 16:50 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 17:48 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 10:29 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 07:43 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 12:23 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 09:48 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-30 09:48 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 11:28 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 17:08 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 13:19 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 17:30 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 17:47 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 17:52 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 13:55 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 03:53 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-31 06:05 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 08:49 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 16:28 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 09:54 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 17:02 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 11:14 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 13:19 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 10:44 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 18:03 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 11:21 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 20:34 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 16:46 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 08:50 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 10:06 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 15:41 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 11:29 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 16:36 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 09:56 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 13:57 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 20:35 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 03:51 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-30 06:07 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-30 09:32 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-30 14:38 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 09:57 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-30 15:02 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 10:15 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-30 10:08 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 12:33 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 10:04 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 10:18 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 15:32 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 00:59 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 01:18 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 01:33 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 01:41 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 02:07 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 21:57 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-31 10:12 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 10:42 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 21:56 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-31 18:02 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-31 14:35 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-31 22:56 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 12:03 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 23:44 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-31 02:22 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 13:49 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-31 09:05 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-10-31 20:21 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:40 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 23:57 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 09:47 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 16:37 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-29 12:44 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 14:00 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-29 15:10 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 20:41 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 22:25 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 18:45 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 01:22 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 02:12 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 20:36 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 15:34 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 09:59 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 17:20 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 11:15 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 00:59 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 18:16 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 18:44 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 02:01 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 19:06 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 19:11 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 02:29 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 19:48 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 03:01 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 20:05 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 03:11 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 20:21 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 03:27 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 20:36 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 03:46 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 21:16 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 04:23 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 08:34 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 15:55 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 09:07 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 20:11 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 08:56 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 09:03 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 19:50 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 03:23 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 20:40 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 03:50 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 21:15 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 07:07 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 09:02 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 09:05 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 13:40 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 10:57 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 14:06 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 11:21 -0700
The Quran Peaceful? My ass Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-28 14:32 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 08:35 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 16:01 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 21:00 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 18:01 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 17:41 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 17:02 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-27 19:30 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 17:05 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 00:18 +0000
Page 5 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 10 Next page →
| From | JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 13:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <slrnn34qtd.rjp.jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
| In reply to | #329496 |
On 2015-10-29, ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 11:25:51 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote:
>
>> On 2015-10-29, ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:11:08 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2015-10-29, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 20:06:57 -0700 Snit
>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/28/15, 7:35 PM, in article n0s0lf$bfl$1@dont-email.me, "ronb"
>>>>>> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:27:04 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >> ...I've always called fundies "American Talibani" or something
>>>>>> >> comparable.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Which really says more about your incessant anti-Christian
>>>>>> > crankdom than anything else. When Christians start regularly
>>>>>> > beheading non-Christians, bring it to my attention.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Right, because killing people in other ways (and a LOT more of them)
>>>>>> is somehow not as bad.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I mean, really, is that the best you have?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> I could not resist to not react on this. Crackpot.
>>>>
>>>> At this point, fundies in America are more about blunting social
>>>> progress
>>>> and trying to drag us backwards than obvious ethnic cleansing.
>>>>
>>>> They can't quite manage living in the modern world but don't have
>>>> the
>>>> balls to turn their back on it like more dedicated (and more harmless)
>>>> groups that just keep to themselves.
>>>
>>> You're a crank on this subject. You speak in the abstract and because
>>> produce the facts. I don't have to speak in the abstract when talking
>>
>> Facts? They sabotage educational standards in many states. They try
>> to deny equal rights to certain parties EVERYWHERE. They actually do
>> KILL some people they disagree with badly enough. They try to sabotage
>> medical care because organizations providing it have a contrary
>> political point of view. They want to inject their religion into
>> government and public education. They advocate corporations imposing
>> their religious views on their employees.
>>
>> They aren't beheading people but they aren't harmless either.
>
> How do "fundies" "sabotage educational standards in many states?" You
> mean by insisting that their children are not force fed the religion of
> Evolutionism, or that they are not forced to deny their Creator?
>
> By denying equal rights to certain parties -- I assume you're speaking of
> marriage among homosexuals. I happen to agree with that. Marriage,
> specifically, is a contract between a man and a woman, its central
> purpose is procreation (families) -- hence the man and woman part.
I guess I had you pegged wrong. You are a fundie and you're just
butthurt because you're getting called out on it.
NEWSFLASH: So called "Christian nations" are now secular societies.
If you want a theocracy, go move to Iran. Good luck with that.
[deletia]
You can do what you like in your churches and temples. The moment you
step outside you have to conform to modern standards of behavior and law.
Although "equality under the law" is hardly a "modern" thing in the
Anglo-Saxon tradition.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-30 03:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n0upkl$ih9$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #329535 |
On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 13:55:41 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: > I guess I had you pegged wrong. You are a fundie and you're just > butthurt because you're getting called out on it. You're a crank, it's in your nature to get it wrong. That's alright, you CAN be cured. First you have to accept the fact that you are an anti- Christian crank -- a kind of "snit" on this subject. That, alone, should horrify you and shock some sense into you. -- Zero tolerance for WinDrones and iCultists & anti-Christian cranks
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-31 06:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1278s$iv5$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #329661 |
On 10/29/2015 10:53 PM, ronb wrote: > On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 13:55:41 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: > >> I guess I had you pegged wrong. You are a fundie and you're just >> butthurt because you're getting called out on it. > > You're a crank, it's in your nature to get it wrong. That's alright, you > CAN be cured. First you have to accept the fact that you are an anti- > Christian crank -- a kind of "snit" on this subject. That, alone, should > horrify you and shock some sense into you. What, you mean you're not a Catholic Fundamentalist? :-D Jeez, talk about a glaring contradiction...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 08:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D2578E2C.61EB8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #329427 |
On 10/29/15, 8:11 AM, in article slrnn34doc.1ld.jedi@nomad.mishnet, "JEDIDIAH" <jedi@nomad.mishnet> wrote: > On 2015-10-29, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 20:06:57 -0700 >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> On 10/28/15, 7:35 PM, in article n0s0lf$bfl$1@dont-email.me, "ronb" >>> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:27:04 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>> >>>>> ...I've always called fundies "American Talibani" or something >>>>> comparable. >>>> >>>> Which really says more about your incessant anti-Christian crankdom >>>> than anything else. When Christians start regularly beheading >>>> non-Christians, bring it to my attention. >>> >>> Right, because killing people in other ways (and a LOT more of them) >>> is somehow not as bad. >>> >>> I mean, really, is that the best you have? >>> >>> >> >> I could not resist to not react on this. Crackpot. > > At this point, fundies in America are more about blunting social progress > and trying to drag us backwards than obvious ethnic cleansing. And their policies kill far more people than the beheadings some are obsessing about. It is not that anyone is defending the beheadings, it is just insane to say those deaths count and others do not. > They can't quite manage living in the modern world but don't have the > balls to turn their back on it like more dedicated (and more harmless) groups > that just keep to themselves. > -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 16:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sghemvjd821.a0a@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #329440 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/29/15, 8:11 AM, in article slrnn34doc.1ld.jedi@nomad.mishnet, > "JEDIDIAH" <jedi@nomad.mishnet> wrote: > >> On 2015-10-29, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 20:06:57 -0700 >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 10/28/15, 7:35 PM, in article n0s0lf$bfl$1@dont-email.me, "ronb" >>>> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:27:04 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> ...I've always called fundies "American Talibani" or something >>>>>> comparable. >>>>> >>>>> Which really says more about your incessant anti-Christian crankdom >>>>> than anything else. When Christians start regularly beheading >>>>> non-Christians, bring it to my attention. >>>> >>>> Right, because killing people in other ways (and a LOT more of them) >>>> is somehow not as bad. >>>> >>>> I mean, really, is that the best you have? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> I could not resist to not react on this. Crackpot. >> >> At this point, fundies in America are more about blunting social progress >> and trying to drag us backwards than obvious ethnic cleansing. > > And their policies kill far more people than the beheadings some are > obsessing about. It is not that anyone is defending the beheadings, it is > just insane to say those deaths count and others do not. > What's insane is trying to draw a moral equivalence with Christians participating in a secular war by virtue of their demographic representation, and Muslims killing in the name of their religion. The modern wars being waged by Western powers in the Middle East have nothing to do with any religious "Crusade" -- and even the historical Crusades were only a natural and much belated response to 500 years of Islamic aggression in the region.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 09:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D2579D3C.61F00%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #329461 |
On 10/29/15, 9:28 AM, in article sghemvjd821.a0a@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> I could not resist to not react on this. Crackpot. >>> >>> At this point, fundies in America are more about blunting social >>> progress >>> and trying to drag us backwards than obvious ethnic cleansing. >> >> And their policies kill far more people than the beheadings some are >> obsessing about. It is not that anyone is defending the beheadings, it is >> just insane to say those deaths count and others do not. > > What's insane is trying to draw a moral equivalence with Christians > participating in a secular war by virtue of their demographic > representation, and Muslims killing in the name of their religion. Christians are looking to kill people, too. And the DO kill people. > The modern wars being waged by Western powers in the Middle East have > nothing to do with any religious "Crusade" Yet they invoke the name of the Christian deity to defend them. > -- and even the historical > Crusades were only a natural and much belated response to 500 years of > Islamic aggression in the region. Support? By support I mean by a real source, not Fox or InfoWars or the like. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 17:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sruger93.kidf@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #329484 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/29/15, 9:28 AM, in article sghemvjd821.a0a@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>>>> I could not resist to not react on this. Crackpot. >>>> >>>> At this point, fundies in America are more about blunting social >>>> progress >>>> and trying to drag us backwards than obvious ethnic cleansing. >>> >>> And their policies kill far more people than the beheadings some are >>> obsessing about. It is not that anyone is defending the beheadings, it is >>> just insane to say those deaths count and others do not. >> >> What's insane is trying to draw a moral equivalence with Christians >> participating in a secular war by virtue of their demographic >> representation, and Muslims killing in the name of their religion. > > Christians are looking to kill people, too. And the DO kill people. > Who does? >> The modern wars being waged by Western powers in the Middle East have >> nothing to do with any religious "Crusade" > > Yet they invoke the name of the Christian deity to defend them. > Who does? >> -- and even the historical >> Crusades were only a natural and much belated response to 500 years of >> Islamic aggression in the region. > > Support? By support I mean by a real source, not Fox or InfoWars or the > like. > Source? Are you kidding me? Get a history book. The First Crusade didn't start until 1096. Islamic Conquest of the Middle East had been going on since 623.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 11:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D257B00C.61F33%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #329495 |
On 10/29/15, 10:02 AM, in article sruger93.kidf@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 10/29/15, 9:28 AM, in article sghemvjd821.a0a@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>>>>> I could not resist to not react on this. Crackpot. >>>>> >>>>> At this point, fundies in America are more about blunting social >>>>> progress >>>>> and trying to drag us backwards than obvious ethnic cleansing. >>>> >>>> And their policies kill far more people than the beheadings some are >>>> obsessing about. It is not that anyone is defending the beheadings, it is >>>> just insane to say those deaths count and others do not. >>> >>> What's insane is trying to draw a moral equivalence with Christians >>> participating in a secular war by virtue of their demographic >>> representation, and Muslims killing in the name of their religion. >> >> Christians are looking to kill people, too. And the DO kill people. > > Who does? Let us start with Bush and Cheney. Heck, you can add Obama to that list, too. Sure, he killed fewer in the name of the Christian deity but that is not exactly a great endorsement. >>> The modern wars being waged by Western powers in the Middle East have >>> nothing to do with any religious "Crusade" >> >> Yet they invoke the name of the Christian deity to defend them. > > Who does? Which US was has NOT been done in the name of the Christian deity? >>> -- and even the historical >>> Crusades were only a natural and much belated response to 500 years of >>> Islamic aggression in the region. >> >> Support? By support I mean by a real source, not Fox or InfoWars or the >> like. >> > > Source? Are you kidding me? Get a history book. The First Crusade > didn't start until 1096. Islamic Conquest of the Middle East had > been going on since 623. And this gave them right to kill Jews and others? -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 13:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0tkb0$jpg$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #329484 |
On 2015-10-29 12:54 PM, Snit wrote: > On 10/29/15, 9:28 AM, in article sghemvjd821.a0a@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>>>> I could not resist to not react on this. Crackpot. >>>> >>>> At this point, fundies in America are more about blunting social >>>> progress >>>> and trying to drag us backwards than obvious ethnic cleansing. >>> >>> And their policies kill far more people than the beheadings some are >>> obsessing about. It is not that anyone is defending the beheadings, it is >>> just insane to say those deaths count and others do not. >> >> What's insane is trying to draw a moral equivalence with Christians >> participating in a secular war by virtue of their demographic >> representation, and Muslims killing in the name of their religion. > > Christians are looking to kill people, too. And the DO kill people. Prove it, especially since we have since established that countries where religion does not interfere with the state are NOT Christian countries. >> The modern wars being waged by Western powers in the Middle East have >> nothing to do with any religious "Crusade" > > Yet they invoke the name of the Christian deity to defend them. No, they don't. Bush did, and the world has since established that he was a moron. Christians mostly disagree with his desire to interfere with the rest of the world's affairs. >> -- and even the historical >> Crusades were only a natural and much belated response to 500 years of >> Islamic aggression in the region. > > Support? By support I mean by a real source, not Fox or InfoWars or the > like. Any historical book. -- Charmed Tuna
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 10:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D257A917.61F28%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #329502 |
On 10/29/15, 10:19 AM, in article n0tkb0$jpg$2@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > On 2015-10-29 12:54 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 10/29/15, 9:28 AM, in article sghemvjd821.a0a@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>>>>> I could not resist to not react on this. Crackpot. >>>>> >>>>> At this point, fundies in America are more about blunting social >>>>> progress >>>>> and trying to drag us backwards than obvious ethnic cleansing. >>>> >>>> And their policies kill far more people than the beheadings some are >>>> obsessing about. It is not that anyone is defending the beheadings, it is >>>> just insane to say those deaths count and others do not. >>> >>> What's insane is trying to draw a moral equivalence with Christians >>> participating in a secular war by virtue of their demographic >>> representation, and Muslims killing in the name of their religion. >> >> Christians are looking to kill people, too. And the DO kill people. > > Prove it, especially since we have since established that countries > where religion does not interfere with the state are NOT Christian > countries. A government does not need to be tied to a religion for people of the religion to cause harm. A BIG example of a war which was pushed by many Christians (though certainly not all) and was waged in the name of the Christian deity was Iraq. It was a disaster... but even if you disagree, it is clear millions died in the name of the Christian deity. >>> The modern wars being waged by Western powers in the Middle East have >>> nothing to do with any religious "Crusade" >> >> Yet they invoke the name of the Christian deity to defend them. > > No, they don't. Bush did, and the world has since established that he > was a moron. Christians mostly disagree with his desire to interfere > with the rest of the world's affairs. Much of the Christian right backed it. But, sure, not all Christians did... just as not all Muslims back the violence of some Muslims. >>> -- and even the historical >>> Crusades were only a natural and much belated response to 500 years of >>> Islamic aggression in the region. >> >> Support? By support I mean by a real source, not Fox or InfoWars or the >> like. > > Any historical book. Have a good online resource to back it? -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 18:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fsjg8r.jai@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #329509 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/29/15, 10:19 AM, in article n0tkb0$jpg$2@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" > <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > >> On 2015-10-29 12:54 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 10/29/15, 9:28 AM, in article sghemvjd821.a0a@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> I could not resist to not react on this. Crackpot. >>>>>> >>>>>> At this point, fundies in America are more about blunting social >>>>>> progress >>>>>> and trying to drag us backwards than obvious ethnic cleansing. >>>>> >>>>> And their policies kill far more people than the beheadings some are >>>>> obsessing about. It is not that anyone is defending the beheadings, it is >>>>> just insane to say those deaths count and others do not. >>>> >>>> What's insane is trying to draw a moral equivalence with Christians >>>> participating in a secular war by virtue of their demographic >>>> representation, and Muslims killing in the name of their religion. >>> >>> Christians are looking to kill people, too. And the DO kill people. >> >> Prove it, especially since we have since established that countries >> where religion does not interfere with the state are NOT Christian >> countries. > > A government does not need to be tied to a religion for people of the > religion to cause harm. A BIG example of a war which was pushed by many > Christians (though certainly not all) and was waged in the name of the > Christian deity was Iraq. It was a disaster... but even if you disagree, it > is clear millions died in the name of the Christian deity. > >>>> The modern wars being waged by Western powers in the Middle East have >>>> nothing to do with any religious "Crusade" >>> >>> Yet they invoke the name of the Christian deity to defend them. >> >> No, they don't. Bush did, and the world has since established that he >> was a moron. Christians mostly disagree with his desire to interfere >> with the rest of the world's affairs. > > Much of the Christian right backed it. But, sure, not all Christians did... > just as not all Muslims back the violence of some Muslims. > >>>> -- and even the historical >>>> Crusades were only a natural and much belated response to 500 years of >>>> Islamic aggression in the region. >>> >>> Support? By support I mean by a real source, not Fox or InfoWars or the >>> like. >> >> Any historical book. > > Have a good online resource to back it? > Your ignorance is astonishing. Start here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_conquests https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Crusade
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 11:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D257B1C1.61F38%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #329512 |
On 10/29/15, 11:03 AM, in article fsjg8r.jai@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
<owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 10/29/15, 10:19 AM, in article n0tkb0$jpg$2@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna"
>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2015-10-29 12:54 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>> On 10/29/15, 9:28 AM, in article sghemvjd821.a0a@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>> I could not resist to not react on this. Crackpot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> At this point, fundies in America are more about blunting social
>>>>>>> progress
>>>>>>> and trying to drag us backwards than obvious ethnic cleansing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And their policies kill far more people than the beheadings some are
>>>>>> obsessing about. It is not that anyone is defending the beheadings, it is
>>>>>> just insane to say those deaths count and others do not.
>>>>>
>>>>> What's insane is trying to draw a moral equivalence with Christians
>>>>> participating in a secular war by virtue of their demographic
>>>>> representation, and Muslims killing in the name of their religion.
>>>>
>>>> Christians are looking to kill people, too. And the DO kill people.
>>>
>>> Prove it, especially since we have since established that countries
>>> where religion does not interfere with the state are NOT Christian
>>> countries.
>>
>> A government does not need to be tied to a religion for people of the
>> religion to cause harm. A BIG example of a war which was pushed by many
>> Christians (though certainly not all) and was waged in the name of the
>> Christian deity was Iraq. It was a disaster... but even if you disagree, it
>> is clear millions died in the name of the Christian deity.
>>
>>>>> The modern wars being waged by Western powers in the Middle East have
>>>>> nothing to do with any religious "Crusade"
>>>>
>>>> Yet they invoke the name of the Christian deity to defend them.
>>>
>>> No, they don't. Bush did, and the world has since established that he
>>> was a moron. Christians mostly disagree with his desire to interfere
>>> with the rest of the world's affairs.
>>
>> Much of the Christian right backed it. But, sure, not all Christians did...
>> just as not all Muslims back the violence of some Muslims.
>>
>>>>> -- and even the historical
>>>>> Crusades were only a natural and much belated response to 500 years of
>>>>> Islamic aggression in the region.
>>>>
>>>> Support? By support I mean by a real source, not Fox or InfoWars or the
>>>> like.
>>>
>>> Any historical book.
>>
>> Have a good online resource to back it?
>>
>
> Your ignorance is astonishing.
> Start here:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_conquests
What part of this do you think is being questioned?
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Crusade
The First Crusade (10961099)... regain the Holy Lands taken in the Muslim
conquests of the Levant (632661).
That is like pushing a war NOW over things that happened in the 1600s!
And then there is this tidbit:
-----
The Crusaders arrived at Jerusalem, launched an assault on the
city, and captured it in July 1099, massacring many of the city's
Muslim, Christian, and Jewish inhabitants.
-----
And this:
-----
At a local level, the preaching of the First Crusade ignited
violence against Jews, which some historians have deemed "the
first Holocaust".[65] At the end of 1095 and beginning of 1096,
months before the departure of the official crusade in August,
there were attacks on Jewish communities in France and Germany. In
May 1096, Emicho of Flonheim (sometimes incorrectly known as
Emicho of Leiningen) attacked the Jews at Speyer and Worms. Other
unofficial crusaders from Swabia, led by Hartmann of Dillingen,
along with French, English, Lotharingian and Flemish volunteers,
led by Drogo of Nesle and William the Carpenter, as well as many
locals, joined Emicho in the destruction of the Jewish community
of Mainz at the end of May.[66] In Mainz, one Jewish woman killed
her children rather than see them killed; the chief rabbi,
Kalonymus Ben Meshullam, committed suicide in anticipation of
being killed.[67]
-----
Did you even skim your own source? What part do you think *I* am denying?
Comes down to you are biased and think Christians are somehow better than
other religions. Nope. There are good and bad deeds done in the name of
each.
--
* OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 20:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <seut93a.jiu@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #329520 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/29/15, 11:03 AM, in article fsjg8r.jai@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 10/29/15, 10:19 AM, in article n0tkb0$jpg$2@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" >>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-10-29 12:54 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 10/29/15, 9:28 AM, in article sghemvjd821.a0a@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>> I could not resist to not react on this. Crackpot. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> At this point, fundies in America are more about blunting social >>>>>>>> progress >>>>>>>> and trying to drag us backwards than obvious ethnic cleansing. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And their policies kill far more people than the beheadings some are >>>>>>> obsessing about. It is not that anyone is defending the beheadings, it is >>>>>>> just insane to say those deaths count and others do not. >>>>>> >>>>>> What's insane is trying to draw a moral equivalence with Christians >>>>>> participating in a secular war by virtue of their demographic >>>>>> representation, and Muslims killing in the name of their religion. >>>>> >>>>> Christians are looking to kill people, too. And the DO kill people. >>>> >>>> Prove it, especially since we have since established that countries >>>> where religion does not interfere with the state are NOT Christian >>>> countries. >>> >>> A government does not need to be tied to a religion for people of the >>> religion to cause harm. A BIG example of a war which was pushed by many >>> Christians (though certainly not all) and was waged in the name of the >>> Christian deity was Iraq. It was a disaster... but even if you disagree, it >>> is clear millions died in the name of the Christian deity. >>> >>>>>> The modern wars being waged by Western powers in the Middle East have >>>>>> nothing to do with any religious "Crusade" >>>>> >>>>> Yet they invoke the name of the Christian deity to defend them. >>>> >>>> No, they don't. Bush did, and the world has since established that he >>>> was a moron. Christians mostly disagree with his desire to interfere >>>> with the rest of the world's affairs. >>> >>> Much of the Christian right backed it. But, sure, not all Christians did... >>> just as not all Muslims back the violence of some Muslims. >>> >>>>>> -- and even the historical >>>>>> Crusades were only a natural and much belated response to 500 years of >>>>>> Islamic aggression in the region. >>>>> >>>>> Support? By support I mean by a real source, not Fox or InfoWars or the >>>>> like. >>>> >>>> Any historical book. >>> >>> Have a good online resource to back it? >>> >> >> Your ignorance is astonishing. >> Start here: >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_conquests > > What part of this do you think is being questioned? > Apparently you question all of it, since by asking for proof that it happened you seemed to indicate that you doubted it. >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Crusade > > The First Crusade (10961099)... regain the Holy Lands taken in the Muslim > conquests of the Levant (632661). > > That is like pushing a war NOW over things that happened in the 1600s! > That's what the ISIS is doing, actually. Glad you've seen the light. > And then there is this tidbit: > ----- > The Crusaders arrived at Jerusalem, launched an assault on the > city, and captured it in July 1099, massacring many of the city's > Muslim, Christian, and Jewish inhabitants. > ----- > So? Newsflash: War is Hell. > And this: > ----- > At a local level, the preaching of the First Crusade ignited > violence against Jews, which some historians have deemed "the > first Holocaust".[65] At the end of 1095 and beginning of 1096, > months before the departure of the official crusade in August, > there were attacks on Jewish communities in France and Germany. In > May 1096, Emicho of Flonheim (sometimes incorrectly known as > Emicho of Leiningen) attacked the Jews at Speyer and Worms. Other > unofficial crusaders from Swabia, led by Hartmann of Dillingen, > along with French, English, Lotharingian and Flemish volunteers, > led by Drogo of Nesle and William the Carpenter, as well as many > locals, joined Emicho in the destruction of the Jewish community > of Mainz at the end of May.[66] In Mainz, one Jewish woman killed > her children rather than see them killed; the chief rabbi, > Kalonymus Ben Meshullam, committed suicide in anticipation of > being killed.[67] > ----- > So? > Did you even skim your own source? What part do you think *I* am denying? > You questioned the fact that the Crusades were in reponse to 500 years of Muslim aggression. Now you know the truth. > Comes down to you are biased and think Christians are somehow better than > other religions. Nope. There are good and bad deeds done in the name of > each. > You asked for support for the idea the the Crusades were in response to 500 years of Muslim aggression in the Middle East. You got it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 16:46 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0u0f6$8e2$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #329509 |
On 2015-10-29 1:44 PM, Snit wrote: > On 10/29/15, 10:19 AM, in article n0tkb0$jpg$2@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" > <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > >> On 2015-10-29 12:54 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 10/29/15, 9:28 AM, in article sghemvjd821.a0a@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> I could not resist to not react on this. Crackpot. >>>>>> >>>>>> At this point, fundies in America are more about blunting social >>>>>> progress >>>>>> and trying to drag us backwards than obvious ethnic cleansing. >>>>> >>>>> And their policies kill far more people than the beheadings some are >>>>> obsessing about. It is not that anyone is defending the beheadings, it is >>>>> just insane to say those deaths count and others do not. >>>> >>>> What's insane is trying to draw a moral equivalence with Christians >>>> participating in a secular war by virtue of their demographic >>>> representation, and Muslims killing in the name of their religion. >>> >>> Christians are looking to kill people, too. And the DO kill people. >> >> Prove it, especially since we have since established that countries >> where religion does not interfere with the state are NOT Christian >> countries. > > A government does not need to be tied to a religion for people of the > religion to cause harm. A BIG example of a war which was pushed by many > Christians (though certainly not all) and was waged in the name of the > Christian deity was Iraq. It was a disaster... but even if you disagree, it > is clear millions died in the name of the Christian deity. > >>>> The modern wars being waged by Western powers in the Middle East have >>>> nothing to do with any religious "Crusade" >>> >>> Yet they invoke the name of the Christian deity to defend them. >> >> No, they don't. Bush did, and the world has since established that he >> was a moron. Christians mostly disagree with his desire to interfere >> with the rest of the world's affairs. > > Much of the Christian right backed it. But, sure, not all Christians did... > just as not all Muslims back the violence of some Muslims. > >>>> -- and even the historical >>>> Crusades were only a natural and much belated response to 500 years of >>>> Islamic aggression in the region. >>> >>> Support? By support I mean by a real source, not Fox or InfoWars or the >>> like. >> >> Any historical book. > > Have a good online resource to back it? How about we stop relying on on-line, subjective sources with no credibility whatsoever and start relying on books published by experts in their fields that are promoted by established universities. Those I read demonstrated that Christians indeed had a reason to feel threatened by Islam and an obligation to protect the Holy Land. Did some of them profit from the Crusades? Of course, just like some profited from the wars of the 20th century. Is Christianity evil? Of course not, but it is easily corrupted by evil people. -- Charmed Tuna
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 08:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D2578E5C.61EB9%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #329352 |
On 10/28/15, 9:11 PM, in article 20151029051119.101a3070@maxa-pc, "Melzzzzz" <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 20:06:57 -0700 > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 10/28/15, 7:35 PM, in article n0s0lf$bfl$1@dont-email.me, "ronb" >> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:27:04 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>> >>>> ...I've always called fundies "American Talibani" or something >>>> comparable. >>> >>> Which really says more about your incessant anti-Christian crankdom >>> than anything else. When Christians start regularly beheading >>> non-Christians, bring it to my attention. >> >> Right, because killing people in other ways (and a LOT more of them) >> is somehow not as bad. >> >> I mean, really, is that the best you have? >> >> > > I could not resist to not react on this. Crackpot. This whole line of "beheadings" thought is insane. Somehow being killed in other ways is not a bad thing but beheadings is? Utterly mad. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 10:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <slrnn34df0.1ld.jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
| In reply to | #329348 |
On 2015-10-29, ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:27:04 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote:
>
>> ...I've always called fundies "American Talibani" or something
>> comparable.
>
> Which really says more about your incessant anti-Christian crankdom than
> anything else. When Christians start regularly beheading non-Christians,
> bring it to my attention.
>
Nope. Not anti-Xian, anti-fundie. There's a big difference.
There is a not insignificant chunk of the evangelical right that would
most happily impose theocracy upon America and view it as being "oppressed"
when they don't get their way in this regard.
Although they aren't entirely harmless. The do still manage to do some
real damage, they aren't quite up to burnings yet.
That's what Xians do to heretics.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 15:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n0temi$ep8$9@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #329420 |
On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:06:08 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: > On 2015-10-29, ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:27:04 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >> >>> ...I've always called fundies "American Talibani" or something >>> comparable. >> >> Which really says more about your incessant anti-Christian crankdom >> than anything else. When Christians start regularly beheading >> non-Christians, >> bring it to my attention. >> >> > Nope. Not anti-Xian, anti-fundie. There's a big difference. > > There is a not insignificant chunk of the evangelical right that > would > most happily impose theocracy upon America and view it as being > "oppressed" > when they don't get their way in this regard. > > Although they aren't entirely harmless. The do still manage to do > some > real damage, they aren't quite up to burnings yet. > > That's what Xians do to heretics. So what, exactly, have Christians done to persecute you? Again, you speak in the abstract. I'm looking for some *real* facts. -- Zero tolerance for WinDrones and iCultists
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 11:29 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <slrnn34ibc.4rj.jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
| In reply to | #329436 |
On 2015-10-29, ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:06:08 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote:
>
>> On 2015-10-29, ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:27:04 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote:
>>>
>>>> ...I've always called fundies "American Talibani" or something
>>>> comparable.
>>>
>>> Which really says more about your incessant anti-Christian crankdom
>>> than anything else. When Christians start regularly beheading
>>> non-Christians,
>>> bring it to my attention.
>>>
>>>
>> Nope. Not anti-Xian, anti-fundie. There's a big difference.
>>
>> There is a not insignificant chunk of the evangelical right that
>> would
>> most happily impose theocracy upon America and view it as being
>> "oppressed"
>> when they don't get their way in this regard.
>>
>> Although they aren't entirely harmless. The do still manage to do
>> some
>> real damage, they aren't quite up to burnings yet.
>>
>> That's what Xians do to heretics.
>
> So what, exactly, have Christians done to persecute you?
>
> Again, you speak in the abstract. I'm looking for some *real* facts.
>
It doesn't have to be me personally. It can be just my neighbors.
There's a nice German poem about the problem of turning a blind eye to
something just because you're not he one being directly abused (just yet).
You've probably heard of it.
If you SERIOUSLY don't think that fundies don't want to run amok in
America you are really out of touch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 16:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n0thu6$4lt$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #329467 |
On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 11:29:32 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: > It doesn't have to be me personally. It can be just my neighbors. > > There's a nice German poem about the problem of turning a blind eye > to > something just because you're not he one being directly abused (just > yet). > > You've probably heard of it. > > If you SERIOUSLY don't think that fundies don't want to run amok in > America you are really out of touch. So ... nothing. More abstract claims about what you think "fundies" want. For one thing "fundies" (fundamentalists) are not a coherent group. They don't have any agenda that they all agree on. There have some broad principals. Protestants, in general, split over just about everything. You're fighting an imaginary force. Your crankdom blinds you to reality of the situation. There's nothing at all like the wackos in ISIS beheading Christians. You've overstepped logic in equating the two groups. -- Zero tolerance for WinDrones and iCultists
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 09:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D2579DBC.61F01%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #329476 |
On 10/29/15, 9:36 AM, in article n0thu6$4lt$2@dont-email.me, "ronb" <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 11:29:32 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: > >> It doesn't have to be me personally. It can be just my neighbors. >> >> There's a nice German poem about the problem of turning a blind eye >> to >> something just because you're not he one being directly abused (just >> yet). >> >> You've probably heard of it. >> >> If you SERIOUSLY don't think that fundies don't want to run amok in >> America you are really out of touch. > > So ... nothing. More abstract claims about what you think "fundies" want. > For one thing "fundies" (fundamentalists) are not a coherent group. Neither are Muslims. > They don't have any agenda that they all agree on. Neither do Muslims. > There have some broad principals. Protestants, in general, split over just > about everything. > > You're fighting an imaginary force. Your crankdom blinds you to reality > of the situation. There's nothing at all like the wackos in ISIS > beheading Christians. You've overstepped logic in equating the two > groups. Why are deaths by beheadings worse to you than other types of deaths? When the Christian right pushes policies that lead to people dying they are just as responsible. When the Christian right pushes illegal wars that kill millions they are just as responsible. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web