Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #328955 > unrolled thread
| Started by | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-27 21:55 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-10-28 00:18 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 403 — 20 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-10-27 21:55 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 15:16 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-27 22:16 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 15:32 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-10-27 22:36 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 15:45 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-27 23:21 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-27 20:07 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 00:34 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 17:41 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-28 01:49 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 17:56 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 08:47 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 08:50 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 13:36 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 10:50 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 14:22 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 11:48 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 17:13 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 14:21 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 00:57 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 08:49 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 08:52 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 16:06 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 09:17 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 09:53 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 14:07 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 13:37 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 10:46 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 04:36 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-28 00:48 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 09:01 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 09:04 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 08:44 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 08:47 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-28 11:27 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 02:35 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 20:06 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-29 05:11 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 10:11 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 15:39 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-29 12:11 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 12:28 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-29 12:30 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 09:49 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 11:25 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 09:52 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 17:01 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 13:23 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 12:05 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 11:30 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 20:37 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 17:20 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 21:53 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 01:18 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 01:58 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 02:32 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 05:16 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 09:04 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-30 09:42 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 17:03 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 17:27 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 13:28 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 15:32 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 09:06 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 20:25 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 14:16 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 16:50 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 17:48 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 10:29 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 07:43 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 12:23 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 09:48 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-30 09:48 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 11:28 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 17:08 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 13:19 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 17:30 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 17:47 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 17:52 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 13:55 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 03:53 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-31 06:05 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 08:49 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 16:28 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 09:54 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 17:02 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 11:14 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 13:19 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 10:44 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 18:03 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 11:21 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 20:34 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 16:46 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 08:50 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 10:06 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 15:41 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 11:29 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 16:36 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 09:56 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 13:57 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 20:35 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 03:51 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-30 06:07 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-30 09:32 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-30 14:38 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 09:57 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-30 15:02 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 10:15 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-30 10:08 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 12:33 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 10:04 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 10:18 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 15:32 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 00:59 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 01:18 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 01:33 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 01:41 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 02:07 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 21:57 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-31 10:12 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-05 13:06 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-05 13:08 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-05 12:54 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 10:42 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 21:56 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-31 18:02 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-31 14:35 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-31 22:56 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 12:03 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 11:10 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-02 11:56 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-02 15:38 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-02 15:38 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 11:11 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 23:44 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-31 02:22 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 13:49 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-31 09:05 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-10-31 20:21 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-31 18:48 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 02:45 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-11-01 03:10 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 04:17 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 21:34 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 10:45 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 21:47 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 16:16 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 00:53 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 19:48 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 04:27 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-03 08:52 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-03 08:50 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 15:37 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 17:55 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 19:27 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 17:05 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-03 15:46 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-03 13:37 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 17:04 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 09:06 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 09:09 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 04:25 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-03 00:34 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 01:09 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 01:41 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 20:54 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 21:51 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 02:07 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 02:24 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 02:38 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 21:49 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 08:46 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 10:16 -0800
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 20:51 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 19:49 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 10:44 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 21:39 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 14:49 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 16:13 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 01:07 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 19:52 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 04:27 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-03 07:37 +0000
@ronb is fucked in the head, big time. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-03 03:14 -0800
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-03 13:27 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 04:23 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 09:58 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-04 14:16 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 22:33 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-04 19:31 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 22:40 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-05 17:53 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 04:21 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 09:54 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-04 09:56 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 07:16 -0800
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-04 14:14 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 22:36 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-04 19:32 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 22:50 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-06 10:04 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-04 22:24 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 22:31 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-05 00:24 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-04 19:29 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 19:47 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 22:45 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 15:02 -0800
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 17:52 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 19:39 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 19:58 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 20:46 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 21:51 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 08:39 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 17:59 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 19:32 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 17:06 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 13:39 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 14:49 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-03 15:53 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-03 19:28 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 09:35 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 09:44 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 07:02 -0800
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 10:50 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 08:06 -0800
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 12:09 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 12:34 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 10:15 -0800
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-04 09:40 -0800
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 12:44 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-04 13:38 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-04 09:19 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-04 16:40 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere "vallor" <vallor@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 23:57 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-02 18:15 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 00:48 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-03 07:16 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-03 06:26 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 04:25 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 04:24 +0000
Women need choices, not enslavement. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-02 17:39 -0800
Re: Women need choices, not enslavement. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 08:56 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-03 07:14 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-03 06:45 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 04:07 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere "JEDIDIAH" <nomad@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-04 06:47 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-04 06:45 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 15:01 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 06:42 -0800
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 15:00 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-04 10:11 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 22:29 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-04 18:55 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 22:46 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 07:42 -0800
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-04 14:19 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-04 15:35 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 22:34 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-05 00:26 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 22:35 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-05 17:53 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-04 19:34 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 22:51 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-05 07:17 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-05 09:23 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-04 22:45 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-04 19:37 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 21:25 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-05 12:58 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-05 17:39 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 22:38 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 22:37 +0000
Evolution and the RC church vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-06 00:23 +0000
Re: Evolution and the RC church vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-06 00:30 +0000
Re: Evolution and the RC church Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-05 19:47 -0500
Re: Evolution and the RC church ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 04:15 +0000
Re: Evolution and the RC church vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-06 04:36 +0000
Re: Evolution and the RC church Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-06 06:04 -0500
Re: Evolution and the RC church chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-06 07:05 -0600
Re: Evolution and the RC church Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-06 08:14 -0500
Re: Evolution and the RC church Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-06 10:57 -0500
Re: Evolution and the RC church Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-06 11:06 -0500
Re: Evolution and the RC church ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 01:16 +0000
Re: Evolution and the RC church GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-06 16:14 -0700
Re: Evolution and the RC church Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-06 16:47 -0700
Re: Evolution and the RC church Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 15:53 -0800
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-06 01:34 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-05 20:37 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-06 09:13 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-06 09:39 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-06 09:19 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-06 06:02 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 04:06 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:40 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 23:57 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 02:41 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-11-01 04:06 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 03:52 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-11-02 05:03 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 13:47 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-01 11:28 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 04:16 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 21:25 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-31 18:44 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 02:43 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-11-01 03:20 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 04:19 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 21:33 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-11-02 05:08 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 13:14 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-11-15 13:52 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 03:53 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-16 12:52 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 17:56 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-01 01:04 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-02 07:56 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 14:18 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 09:35 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-02 17:52 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 10:22 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-02 17:59 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 21:48 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 11:09 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 11:15 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 21:44 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 14:51 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-02 22:35 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-02 23:03 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-02 23:36 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 00:14 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 01:00 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 01:13 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 01:39 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 02:16 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 02:50 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 03:25 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 04:41 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 09:29 -0800
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 17:44 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 17:53 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 09:47 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 16:37 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-29 12:44 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 14:00 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-29 15:10 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 20:41 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 22:25 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 18:45 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 01:22 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 02:12 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 20:36 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 15:34 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 09:59 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 17:20 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 11:15 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 00:59 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 18:16 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 18:44 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 02:01 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 19:06 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 19:11 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 02:29 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 19:48 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 03:01 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 20:05 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 03:11 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 20:21 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 03:27 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 20:36 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 03:46 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 21:16 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 04:23 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 08:34 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 15:55 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 09:07 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 20:11 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 08:56 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 09:03 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 19:50 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 03:23 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 20:40 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 03:50 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 21:15 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 07:07 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 09:02 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 09:05 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 13:40 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 10:57 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 14:06 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 11:21 -0700
The Quran Peaceful? My ass Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-28 14:32 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 08:35 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 16:01 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 21:00 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 18:01 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 17:41 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 17:02 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-27 19:30 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 17:05 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 00:18 +0000
Page 3 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 21 Next page →
| From | ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 15:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n0tekb$ep8$8@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #329427 |
On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:11:08 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: > On 2015-10-29, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 20:06:57 -0700 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 10/28/15, 7:35 PM, in article n0s0lf$bfl$1@dont-email.me, "ronb" >>> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:27:04 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>> > >>> >> ...I've always called fundies "American Talibani" or something >>> >> comparable. >>> > >>> > Which really says more about your incessant anti-Christian crankdom >>> > than anything else. When Christians start regularly beheading >>> > non-Christians, bring it to my attention. >>> >>> Right, because killing people in other ways (and a LOT more of them) >>> is somehow not as bad. >>> >>> I mean, really, is that the best you have? >>> >>> >>> >> I could not resist to not react on this. Crackpot. > > At this point, fundies in America are more about blunting social > progress > and trying to drag us backwards than obvious ethnic cleansing. > > They can't quite manage living in the modern world but don't have > the > balls to turn their back on it like more dedicated (and more harmless) > groups that just keep to themselves. You're a crank on this subject. You speak in the abstract and because produce the facts. I don't have to speak in the abstract when talking about what ISIS is doing to Christians. Beheading people vs standing up for your beliefs are completely different things. Or do you deny the right of "fundies" to have their beliefs? By the way, I'm not a "fundie" -- I'm a Catholic, but you either believe in freedom of religion, or you don't. Cranks don't. They believe their "religious" social mores (which, BTW, are destroying our country and the fundamental unit of society -- the family) are sacrosanct. This really doesn't have anything to do with Linux, but I guess it's more interesting than the constant iCultist and WinDrone trolling. -- Zero tolerance for WinDrones and iCultists
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 12:11 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <1aekfqxp1dxw6.1xk17eyorj1e7$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #329435 |
On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 15:39:56 +0000 (UTC), ronb wrote: > On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:11:08 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: > >> On 2015-10-29, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 20:06:57 -0700 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 10/28/15, 7:35 PM, in article n0s0lf$bfl$1@dont-email.me, "ronb" >>>> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:27:04 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> ...I've always called fundies "American Talibani" or something >>>> >> comparable. >>>> > >>>> > Which really says more about your incessant anti-Christian crankdom >>>> > than anything else. When Christians start regularly beheading >>>> > non-Christians, bring it to my attention. >>>> >>>> Right, because killing people in other ways (and a LOT more of them) >>>> is somehow not as bad. >>>> >>>> I mean, really, is that the best you have? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> I could not resist to not react on this. Crackpot. >> >> At this point, fundies in America are more about blunting social >> progress >> and trying to drag us backwards than obvious ethnic cleansing. >> >> They can't quite manage living in the modern world but don't have >> the >> balls to turn their back on it like more dedicated (and more harmless) >> groups that just keep to themselves. > > You're a crank on this subject. Jed is a crank on any subject. He speaks in extreme generalities because he doesn't have the facts and/or the facts go against his somewhat obtuse opinions. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 12:28 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0thbn$4fd$8@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #329435 |
On 2015-10-29 11:39 AM, ronb wrote: > On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:11:08 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: > >> On 2015-10-29, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 20:06:57 -0700 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 10/28/15, 7:35 PM, in article n0s0lf$bfl$1@dont-email.me, "ronb" >>>> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:27:04 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> ...I've always called fundies "American Talibani" or something >>>>>> comparable. >>>>> >>>>> Which really says more about your incessant anti-Christian crankdom >>>>> than anything else. When Christians start regularly beheading >>>>> non-Christians, bring it to my attention. >>>> >>>> Right, because killing people in other ways (and a LOT more of them) >>>> is somehow not as bad. >>>> >>>> I mean, really, is that the best you have? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> I could not resist to not react on this. Crackpot. >> >> At this point, fundies in America are more about blunting social >> progress >> and trying to drag us backwards than obvious ethnic cleansing. >> >> They can't quite manage living in the modern world but don't have >> the >> balls to turn their back on it like more dedicated (and more harmless) >> groups that just keep to themselves. > > You're a crank on this subject. You speak in the abstract and because > produce the facts. I don't have to speak in the abstract when talking > about what ISIS is doing to Christians. Beheading people vs standing up > for your beliefs are completely different things. Or do you deny the > right of "fundies" to have their beliefs? By the way, I'm not a "fundie" > -- I'm a Catholic, but you either believe in freedom of religion, or you > don't. Cranks don't. They believe their "religious" social mores (which, > BTW, are destroying our country and the fundamental unit of society -- > the family) are sacrosanct. > > This really doesn't have anything to do with Linux, but I guess it's more > interesting than the constant iCultist and WinDrone trolling. I agree and I thank you for the post. -- Charmed Tuna
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 12:30 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <151qyq06jonjn$.17ncn1rx8nkfm.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #329462 |
On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 12:28:44 -0400, Charmed Tuna wrote: > On 2015-10-29 11:39 AM, ronb wrote: >> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:11:08 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >> >>> On 2015-10-29, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 20:06:57 -0700 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 10/28/15, 7:35 PM, in article n0s0lf$bfl$1@dont-email.me, "ronb" >>>>> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:27:04 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> ...I've always called fundies "American Talibani" or something >>>>>>> comparable. >>>>>> >>>>>> Which really says more about your incessant anti-Christian crankdom >>>>>> than anything else. When Christians start regularly beheading >>>>>> non-Christians, bring it to my attention. >>>>> >>>>> Right, because killing people in other ways (and a LOT more of them) >>>>> is somehow not as bad. >>>>> >>>>> I mean, really, is that the best you have? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I could not resist to not react on this. Crackpot. >>> >>> At this point, fundies in America are more about blunting social >>> progress >>> and trying to drag us backwards than obvious ethnic cleansing. >>> >>> They can't quite manage living in the modern world but don't have >>> the >>> balls to turn their back on it like more dedicated (and more harmless) >>> groups that just keep to themselves. >> >> You're a crank on this subject. You speak in the abstract and because >> produce the facts. I don't have to speak in the abstract when talking >> about what ISIS is doing to Christians. Beheading people vs standing up >> for your beliefs are completely different things. Or do you deny the >> right of "fundies" to have their beliefs? By the way, I'm not a "fundie" >> -- I'm a Catholic, but you either believe in freedom of religion, or you >> don't. Cranks don't. They believe their "religious" social mores (which, >> BTW, are destroying our country and the fundamental unit of society -- >> the family) are sacrosanct. >> >> This really doesn't have anything to do with Linux, but I guess it's more >> interesting than the constant iCultist and WinDrone trolling. > > I agree and I thank you for the post. +1 Nice post by Ronb -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 09:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D2579C13.61EF2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #329462 |
On 10/29/15, 9:28 AM, in article n0thbn$4fd$8@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > On 2015-10-29 11:39 AM, ronb wrote: >> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:11:08 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >> >>> On 2015-10-29, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 20:06:57 -0700 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 10/28/15, 7:35 PM, in article n0s0lf$bfl$1@dont-email.me, "ronb" >>>>> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:27:04 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> ...I've always called fundies "American Talibani" or something >>>>>>> comparable. >>>>>> >>>>>> Which really says more about your incessant anti-Christian crankdom >>>>>> than anything else. When Christians start regularly beheading >>>>>> non-Christians, bring it to my attention. >>>>> >>>>> Right, because killing people in other ways (and a LOT more of them) >>>>> is somehow not as bad. >>>>> >>>>> I mean, really, is that the best you have? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I could not resist to not react on this. Crackpot. >>> >>> At this point, fundies in America are more about blunting social progress >>> and trying to drag us backwards than obvious ethnic cleansing. >>> >>> They can't quite manage living in the modern world but don't have the balls >>> to turn their back on it like more dedicated (and more harmless) groups that >>> just keep to themselves. >>> >> You're a crank on this subject. You speak in the abstract and because produce >> the facts. I don't have to speak in the abstract when talking about what ISIS >> is doing to Christians. Nor is it abstract to say what Christians are doing. >> Beheading people vs standing up for your beliefs are completely different >> things. Nobody said otherwise. >> Or do you deny the right of "fundies" to have their beliefs? By the way, I'm >> not a "fundie" -- I'm a Catholic, but you either believe in freedom of >> religion, or you don't. Cranks don't. They believe their "religious" social >> mores (which, BTW, are destroying our country and the fundamental unit of >> society -- the family) are sacrosanct. This is pretty much his point: those who are pushing their religion as the one and only right way to do things, and are willing to harm others based on this are wrong. Does not matter if they are Christian or Muslim (or other). >> This really doesn't have anything to do with Linux, but I guess it's more >> interesting than the constant iCultist and WinDrone trolling. >> > I agree and I thank you for the post. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 11:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <slrnn34i4f.4rj.jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
| In reply to | #329435 |
On 2015-10-29, ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:11:08 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote:
>
>> On 2015-10-29, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 20:06:57 -0700 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10/28/15, 7:35 PM, in article n0s0lf$bfl$1@dont-email.me, "ronb"
>>>> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:27:04 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> ...I've always called fundies "American Talibani" or something
>>>> >> comparable.
>>>> >
>>>> > Which really says more about your incessant anti-Christian crankdom
>>>> > than anything else. When Christians start regularly beheading
>>>> > non-Christians, bring it to my attention.
>>>>
>>>> Right, because killing people in other ways (and a LOT more of them)
>>>> is somehow not as bad.
>>>>
>>>> I mean, really, is that the best you have?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I could not resist to not react on this. Crackpot.
>>
>> At this point, fundies in America are more about blunting social
>> progress
>> and trying to drag us backwards than obvious ethnic cleansing.
>>
>> They can't quite manage living in the modern world but don't have
>> the
>> balls to turn their back on it like more dedicated (and more harmless)
>> groups that just keep to themselves.
>
> You're a crank on this subject. You speak in the abstract and because
> produce the facts. I don't have to speak in the abstract when talking
Facts? They sabotage educational standards in many states. They try
to deny equal rights to certain parties EVERYWHERE. They actually do KILL
some people they disagree with badly enough. They try to sabotage medical
care because organizations providing it have a contrary political point
of view. They want to inject their religion into government and public
education. They advocate corporations imposing their religious views on
their employees.
They aren't beheading people but they aren't harmless either.
> about what ISIS is doing to Christians. Beheading people vs standing up
> for your beliefs are completely different things. Or do you deny the
> right of "fundies" to have their beliefs? By the way, I'm not a "fundie"
> -- I'm a Catholic, but you either believe in freedom of religion, or you
> don't. Cranks don't. They believe their "religious" social mores (which,
Here we go with the faux martyrdom.
You're such a martyr because someone doesn't buy into your bullshit
and has the audacity to say so. Sorry honey but that's just free speech
in action. If you can't handle it, an ISIS regime really is more your
speed.
[deletia]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 09:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D2579CDC.61EFE%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #329464 |
On 10/29/15, 9:25 AM, in article slrnn34i4f.4rj.jedi@nomad.mishnet, "JEDIDIAH" <jedi@nomad.mishnet> wrote: ... >>> They can't quite manage living in the modern world but don't have the balls >>> to turn their back on it like more dedicated (and more harmless) groups that >>> just keep to themselves. >>> >> You're a crank on this subject. You speak in the abstract and because produce >> the facts. I don't have to speak in the abstract when talking >> > Facts? They sabotage educational standards in many states. They try to deny > equal rights to certain parties EVERYWHERE. They actually do KILL some people > they disagree with badly enough. But rarely with beheadings... so these deaths somehow are not as bad? I do not get the focus on beheadings. > They try to sabotage medical care because > organizations providing it have a contrary political point of view. They want > to inject their religion into government and public education. They advocate > corporations imposing their religious views on their employees. > > They aren't beheading people but they aren't harmless either. Exactly. Then also look at Iraq and how it was pushed and supported mostly by Christians and they even used their deity to defend the crimes. And a LOT more people died from that than the few beheadings we have seen. NOT that those are acceptable, they are not, but why focus on one type of harm and ignore others. It is insane. >> about what ISIS is doing to Christians. Beheading people vs standing up for >> your beliefs are completely different things. Or do you deny the right of >> "fundies" to have their beliefs? By the way, I'm not a "fundie" -- I'm a >> Catholic, but you either believe in freedom of religion, or you don't. Cranks >> don't. They believe their "religious" social mores (which, >> > Here we go with the faux martyrdom. > > You're such a martyr because someone doesn't buy into your bullshit and has > the audacity to say so. Sorry honey but that's just free speech in action. If > you can't handle it, an ISIS regime really is more your speed. Standing up for your beliefs is fine. Pushing harm and denying equality for others is not. RonB is trying to equate these two things - in other words he is being amazingly naïve or openly dishonest. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 17:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n0tjcj$4lt$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #329464 |
On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 11:25:51 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: > On 2015-10-29, ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:11:08 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >> >>> On 2015-10-29, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 20:06:57 -0700 Snit >>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 10/28/15, 7:35 PM, in article n0s0lf$bfl$1@dont-email.me, "ronb" >>>>> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:27:04 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> >> ...I've always called fundies "American Talibani" or something >>>>> >> comparable. >>>>> > >>>>> > Which really says more about your incessant anti-Christian >>>>> > crankdom than anything else. When Christians start regularly >>>>> > beheading non-Christians, bring it to my attention. >>>>> >>>>> Right, because killing people in other ways (and a LOT more of them) >>>>> is somehow not as bad. >>>>> >>>>> I mean, really, is that the best you have? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I could not resist to not react on this. Crackpot. >>> >>> At this point, fundies in America are more about blunting social >>> progress >>> and trying to drag us backwards than obvious ethnic cleansing. >>> >>> They can't quite manage living in the modern world but don't have >>> the >>> balls to turn their back on it like more dedicated (and more harmless) >>> groups that just keep to themselves. >> >> You're a crank on this subject. You speak in the abstract and because >> produce the facts. I don't have to speak in the abstract when talking > > Facts? They sabotage educational standards in many states. They try > to deny equal rights to certain parties EVERYWHERE. They actually do > KILL some people they disagree with badly enough. They try to sabotage > medical care because organizations providing it have a contrary > political point of view. They want to inject their religion into > government and public education. They advocate corporations imposing > their religious views on their employees. > > They aren't beheading people but they aren't harmless either. How do "fundies" "sabotage educational standards in many states?" You mean by insisting that their children are not force fed the religion of Evolutionism, or that they are not forced to deny their Creator? By denying equal rights to certain parties -- I assume you're speaking of marriage among homosexuals. I happen to agree with that. Marriage, specifically, is a contract between a man and a woman, its central purpose is procreation (families) -- hence the man and woman part. Protestants (including the "fundie" branch) cut their legs out from under themselves when they accepted birth control in the early 1930s ... but we're going far afield here (especially for a Linux newsgroup) here. (I'll be arguing with everybody.) But, what the heck. Let's talk about denying rights and those who do it. Homosexual activists are now demanding that businessmen and women directly oppose their beliefs by printing teeshirts with pro-homosexual messages, or by making cakes for homosexual "marriages," etc. If they obey the unlawful dictates of judges (who think the can make law) they are fined or even jailed. Right to our religious beliefs have always been fundamental in country. By forcing men and women to directly oppose their beliefs -- by threats -- you are destroying their rights. Perhaps you should look at it from the other side every now and then. As for sabotaging medical care ... what you're talking about is abortion (murder) and birth control -- and the government forcing those who don't believe in it to provide it. Again, who is being forced to do something against their will here. The abortionists or the "fundies?" (Or the Catholics?) No, because a company opposes providing abortion pills (some forms of birth control destroys the fertilized egg) you turn reason on its head and claim the employee is forced to accept their religious belief. What is really happening is someone with a religious belief is being forced to betray that belief. Again who is the harmed party? The person who can buy birth control pills cheaply anywhere, or the company that is forced to oppose their religion to supply them? It's got nothing to do with cost, it has everyone to do with our atheistic government (with an agenda) forcing their will on Christians. In the case of Hobby Lobby, even the courts agreed that the government was taking their agenda too far. Of course none of this has anything to do with REAL persecution, like what the Communist, atheistic governments did to Christians in the Soviet Union or Red China. Nor does it have anything at all to do with what ISIS is doing to Christians in Syria and Iraq today. That's not pretend "persecution" (i.e., I don't get my way -- or the right to force someone to give me what I want -- therefore I'm being "persecuted."). >> about what ISIS is doing to Christians. Beheading people vs standing up >> for your beliefs are completely different things. Or do you deny the >> right of "fundies" to have their beliefs? By the way, I'm not a >> "fundie" >> -- I'm a Catholic, but you either believe in freedom of religion, or >> you don't. Cranks don't. They believe their "religious" social mores >> (which, > > Here we go with the faux martyrdom. > > You're such a martyr because someone doesn't buy into your bullshit > and has the audacity to say so. Sorry honey but that's just free speech > in action. If you can't handle it, an ISIS regime really is more your > speed. > > [deletia] You're the one who is is the wannabe martyr. "Christians don't agree with me. Wah, wah! Government come in and force them to give me what I want and make them agree with me!" Get over yourself, crank. -- Zero tolerance for WinDrones and iCultists
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 13:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0tkis$jpg$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #329496 |
On 2015-10-29 1:01 PM, ronb wrote: > On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 11:25:51 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: > >> On 2015-10-29, ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:11:08 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-10-29, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 20:06:57 -0700 Snit >>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 10/28/15, 7:35 PM, in article n0s0lf$bfl$1@dont-email.me, "ronb" >>>>>> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:27:04 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ...I've always called fundies "American Talibani" or something >>>>>>>> comparable. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Which really says more about your incessant anti-Christian >>>>>>> crankdom than anything else. When Christians start regularly >>>>>>> beheading non-Christians, bring it to my attention. >>>>>> >>>>>> Right, because killing people in other ways (and a LOT more of them) >>>>>> is somehow not as bad. >>>>>> >>>>>> I mean, really, is that the best you have? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> I could not resist to not react on this. Crackpot. >>>> >>>> At this point, fundies in America are more about blunting social >>>> progress >>>> and trying to drag us backwards than obvious ethnic cleansing. >>>> >>>> They can't quite manage living in the modern world but don't have >>>> the >>>> balls to turn their back on it like more dedicated (and more harmless) >>>> groups that just keep to themselves. >>> >>> You're a crank on this subject. You speak in the abstract and because >>> produce the facts. I don't have to speak in the abstract when talking >> >> Facts? They sabotage educational standards in many states. They try >> to deny equal rights to certain parties EVERYWHERE. They actually do >> KILL some people they disagree with badly enough. They try to sabotage >> medical care because organizations providing it have a contrary >> political point of view. They want to inject their religion into >> government and public education. They advocate corporations imposing >> their religious views on their employees. >> >> They aren't beheading people but they aren't harmless either. > > How do "fundies" "sabotage educational standards in many states?" You > mean by insisting that their children are not force fed the religion of > Evolutionism, or that they are not forced to deny their Creator? > > By denying equal rights to certain parties -- I assume you're speaking of > marriage among homosexuals. I happen to agree with that. Marriage, > specifically, is a contract between a man and a woman, its central > purpose is procreation (families) -- hence the man and woman part. > Protestants (including the "fundie" branch) cut their legs out from under > themselves when they accepted birth control in the early 1930s ... but > we're going far afield here (especially for a Linux newsgroup) here. > (I'll be arguing with everybody.) > > But, what the heck. Let's talk about denying rights and those who do it. > Homosexual activists are now demanding that businessmen and women > directly oppose their beliefs by printing teeshirts with pro-homosexual > messages, or by making cakes for homosexual "marriages," etc. If they > obey the unlawful dictates of judges (who think the can make law) they > are fined or even jailed. Right to our religious beliefs have always been > fundamental in country. By forcing men and women to directly oppose their > beliefs -- by threats -- you are destroying their rights. Perhaps you > should look at it from the other side every now and then. > > As for sabotaging medical care ... what you're talking about is abortion > (murder) and birth control -- and the government forcing those who don't > believe in it to provide it. Again, who is being forced to do something > against their will here. The abortionists or the "fundies?" (Or the > Catholics?) > > No, because a company opposes providing abortion pills (some forms of > birth control destroys the fertilized egg) you turn reason on its head > and claim the employee is forced to accept their religious belief. What > is really happening is someone with a religious belief is being forced to > betray that belief. Again who is the harmed party? The person who can buy > birth control pills cheaply anywhere, or the company that is forced to > oppose their religion to supply them? It's got nothing to do with cost, > it has everyone to do with our atheistic government (with an agenda) > forcing their will on Christians. In the case of Hobby Lobby, even the > courts agreed that the government was taking their agenda too far. > > Of course none of this has anything to do with REAL persecution, like > what the Communist, atheistic governments did to Christians in the Soviet > Union or Red China. Nor does it have anything at all to do with what ISIS > is doing to Christians in Syria and Iraq today. That's not pretend > "persecution" (i.e., I don't get my way -- or the right to force someone > to give me what I want -- therefore I'm being "persecuted."). > >>> about what ISIS is doing to Christians. Beheading people vs standing up >>> for your beliefs are completely different things. Or do you deny the >>> right of "fundies" to have their beliefs? By the way, I'm not a >>> "fundie" >>> -- I'm a Catholic, but you either believe in freedom of religion, or >>> you don't. Cranks don't. They believe their "religious" social mores >>> (which, >> >> Here we go with the faux martyrdom. >> >> You're such a martyr because someone doesn't buy into your bullshit >> and has the audacity to say so. Sorry honey but that's just free speech >> in action. If you can't handle it, an ISIS regime really is more your >> speed. >> >> [deletia] > > You're the one who is is the wannabe martyr. "Christians don't agree with > me. Wah, wah! Government come in and force them to give me what I want > and make them agree with me!" > > Get over yourself, crank. You've earned my respect, ronb. -- Charmed Tuna
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 12:05 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <prWdnSd3JYWe_a_LnZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #329505 |
On 10/29/15 11:23, Charmed Tuna wrote: > On 2015-10-29 1:01 PM, ronb wrote: >> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 11:25:51 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >> >>> On 2015-10-29, ronb<ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:11:08 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2015-10-29, Melzzzzz<mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 20:06:57 -0700 Snit >>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 10/28/15, 7:35 PM, in article n0s0lf$bfl$1@dont-email.me, "ronb" >>>>>>> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:27:04 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ...I've always called fundies "American Talibani" or something >>>>>>>>> comparable. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Which really says more about your incessant anti-Christian >>>>>>>> crankdom than anything else. When Christians start regularly >>>>>>>> beheading non-Christians, bring it to my attention. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Right, because killing people in other ways (and a LOT more of them) >>>>>>> is somehow not as bad. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I mean, really, is that the best you have? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> I could not resist to not react on this. Crackpot. >>>>> >>>>> At this point, fundies in America are more about blunting social >>>>> progress >>>>> and trying to drag us backwards than obvious ethnic cleansing. >>>>> >>>>> They can't quite manage living in the modern world but don't have >>>>> the >>>>> balls to turn their back on it like more dedicated (and more harmless) >>>>> groups that just keep to themselves. >>>> >>>> You're a crank on this subject. You speak in the abstract and because >>>> produce the facts. I don't have to speak in the abstract when talking >>> >>> Facts? They sabotage educational standards in many states. They try >>> to deny equal rights to certain parties EVERYWHERE. They actually do >>> KILL some people they disagree with badly enough. They try to sabotage >>> medical care because organizations providing it have a contrary >>> political point of view. They want to inject their religion into >>> government and public education. They advocate corporations imposing >>> their religious views on their employees. >>> >>> They aren't beheading people but they aren't harmless either. >> >> How do "fundies" "sabotage educational standards in many states?" You >> mean by insisting that their children are not force fed the religion of >> Evolutionism, or that they are not forced to deny their Creator? >> >> By denying equal rights to certain parties -- I assume you're speaking of >> marriage among homosexuals. I happen to agree with that. Marriage, >> specifically, is a contract between a man and a woman, its central >> purpose is procreation (families) -- hence the man and woman part. >> Protestants (including the "fundie" branch) cut their legs out from under >> themselves when they accepted birth control in the early 1930s ... but >> we're going far afield here (especially for a Linux newsgroup) here. >> (I'll be arguing with everybody.) >> >> But, what the heck. Let's talk about denying rights and those who do it. >> Homosexual activists are now demanding that businessmen and women >> directly oppose their beliefs by printing teeshirts with pro-homosexual >> messages, or by making cakes for homosexual "marriages," etc. If they >> obey the unlawful dictates of judges (who think the can make law) they >> are fined or even jailed. Right to our religious beliefs have always been >> fundamental in country. By forcing men and women to directly oppose their >> beliefs -- by threats -- you are destroying their rights. Perhaps you >> should look at it from the other side every now and then. >> >> As for sabotaging medical care ... what you're talking about is abortion >> (murder) and birth control -- and the government forcing those who don't >> believe in it to provide it. Again, who is being forced to do something >> against their will here. The abortionists or the "fundies?" (Or the >> Catholics?) >> >> No, because a company opposes providing abortion pills (some forms of >> birth control destroys the fertilized egg) you turn reason on its head >> and claim the employee is forced to accept their religious belief. What >> is really happening is someone with a religious belief is being forced to >> betray that belief. Again who is the harmed party? The person who can buy >> birth control pills cheaply anywhere, or the company that is forced to >> oppose their religion to supply them? It's got nothing to do with cost, >> it has everyone to do with our atheistic government (with an agenda) >> forcing their will on Christians. In the case of Hobby Lobby, even the >> courts agreed that the government was taking their agenda too far. >> >> Of course none of this has anything to do with REAL persecution, like >> what the Communist, atheistic governments did to Christians in the Soviet >> Union or Red China. Nor does it have anything at all to do with what ISIS >> is doing to Christians in Syria and Iraq today. That's not pretend >> "persecution" (i.e., I don't get my way -- or the right to force someone >> to give me what I want -- therefore I'm being "persecuted."). >> >>>> about what ISIS is doing to Christians. Beheading people vs standing up >>>> for your beliefs are completely different things. Or do you deny the >>>> right of "fundies" to have their beliefs? By the way, I'm not a >>>> "fundie" >>>> -- I'm a Catholic, but you either believe in freedom of religion, or >>>> you don't. Cranks don't. They believe their "religious" social mores >>>> (which, >>> >>> Here we go with the faux martyrdom. >>> >>> You're such a martyr because someone doesn't buy into your bullshit >>> and has the audacity to say so. Sorry honey but that's just free speech >>> in action. If you can't handle it, an ISIS regime really is more your >>> speed. >>> >>> [deletia] >> >> You're the one who is is the wannabe martyr. "Christians don't agree with >> me. Wah, wah! Government come in and force them to give me what I want >> and make them agree with me!" >> >> Get over yourself, crank. > > You've earned my respect, ronb. > > I have to concur on that one. Jed thinks the current mode that civilization is in is somehow modern? Even the pedophiles are now demanding they have a right to screw your children. And the pooch humpers also want their right to screw the pooch. The list is getting longer. Myself, I know the laws are still on the books against that stuff. -- When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the bottom, and have a longer blanket."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 11:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D257B3DF.61F44%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #329513 |
On 10/29/15, 11:05 AM, in article
prWdnSd3JYWe_a_LnZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@bresnan.com, "GreyCloud" <cumulus@mist.com>
wrote:
>>> You're the one who is is the wannabe martyr. "Christians don't agree with
>>> me. Wah, wah! Government come in and force them to give me what I want
>>> and make them agree with me!"
>>>
>>> Get over yourself, crank.
>>
>> You've earned my respect, ronb.
>>
>>
> I have to concur on that one.
> Jed thinks the current mode that civilization is in is somehow modern?
> Even the pedophiles are now demanding they have a right to screw your
> children.
You mean like it says in the Bible?
<http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/says_about/pedophilia.html>
The Bible is a book that promotes pedophilia! But that has nothing to do
with equality for gays!
> And the pooch humpers also want their right to screw the pooch. The list is
> getting longer. Myself, I know the laws are still on the books against that
> stuff.
In many states there are, unfortunately, no laws against bestiality!
<http://wp.me/p3dI4z-1CH>
-----
Bestiality Is Legal in the Same States That Ban Same-Sex
Marriage
...
The states which do not criminalize Bestiality, yet ban Same
Sex Marriage are as follows:
Kentucky; Montana; New Jersey; Nevada; Ohio; Texas; Virginia; West
Virginia; and Wyoming (Note: New Jersey does permit Civil Unions.)
-----
To be fair that is from 2013 and is now outdated: at the very least same sex
marriage is no longer outlawed. The push by, largely, the religious right to
control other people has been beaten in this area.
--
* OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 20:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sfgbnch74.jg@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #329525 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/29/15, 11:05 AM, in article > prWdnSd3JYWe_a_LnZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@bresnan.com, "GreyCloud" <cumulus@mist.com> > wrote: > >>>> You're the one who is is the wannabe martyr. "Christians don't agree with >>>> me. Wah, wah! Government come in and force them to give me what I want >>>> and make them agree with me!" >>>> >>>> Get over yourself, crank. >>> >>> You've earned my respect, ronb. >>> >>> >> I have to concur on that one. >> Jed thinks the current mode that civilization is in is somehow modern? >> Even the pedophiles are now demanding they have a right to screw your >> children. > > You mean like it says in the Bible? > > <http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/says_about/pedophilia.html> > > The Bible is a book that promotes pedophilia! But that has nothing to do > with equality for gays! > >> And the pooch humpers also want their right to screw the pooch. The list is >> getting longer. Myself, I know the laws are still on the books against that >> stuff. > > In many states there are, unfortunately, no laws against bestiality! > > <http://wp.me/p3dI4z-1CH> > ----- > Bestiality Is Legal in the Same States That Ban Same-Sex > Marriage > ... > The states which do not criminalize Bestiality, yet ban Same > Sex Marriage are as follows: > > Kentucky; Montana; New Jersey; Nevada; Ohio; Texas; Virginia; West > Virginia; and Wyoming (Note: New Jersey does permit Civil Unions.) > ----- > > To be fair that is from 2013 and is now outdated: at the very least same sex > marriage is no longer outlawed. The push by, largely, the religious right to > control other people has been beaten in this area. > salon.com recently published an article sympathetic to child molestors. The Left is truly disgusting.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 17:20 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0u2eu$g4l$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #329560 |
On 2015-10-29 4:37 PM, owl wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 10/29/15, 11:05 AM, in article >> prWdnSd3JYWe_a_LnZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@bresnan.com, "GreyCloud" <cumulus@mist.com> >> wrote: >> >>>>> You're the one who is is the wannabe martyr. "Christians don't agree with >>>>> me. Wah, wah! Government come in and force them to give me what I want >>>>> and make them agree with me!" >>>>> >>>>> Get over yourself, crank. >>>> >>>> You've earned my respect, ronb. >>>> >>>> >>> I have to concur on that one. >>> Jed thinks the current mode that civilization is in is somehow modern? >>> Even the pedophiles are now demanding they have a right to screw your >>> children. >> >> You mean like it says in the Bible? >> >> <http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/says_about/pedophilia.html> >> >> The Bible is a book that promotes pedophilia! But that has nothing to do >> with equality for gays! >> >>> And the pooch humpers also want their right to screw the pooch. The list is >>> getting longer. Myself, I know the laws are still on the books against that >>> stuff. >> >> In many states there are, unfortunately, no laws against bestiality! >> >> <http://wp.me/p3dI4z-1CH> >> ----- >> Bestiality Is Legal in the Same States That Ban Same-Sex >> Marriage >> ... >> The states which do not criminalize Bestiality, yet ban Same >> Sex Marriage are as follows: >> >> Kentucky; Montana; New Jersey; Nevada; Ohio; Texas; Virginia; West >> Virginia; and Wyoming (Note: New Jersey does permit Civil Unions.) >> ----- >> >> To be fair that is from 2013 and is now outdated: at the very least same sex >> marriage is no longer outlawed. The push by, largely, the religious right to >> control other people has been beaten in this area. >> > > salon.com recently published an article sympathetic to child molestors. > The Left is truly disgusting. +1. I saw it. The very fact that Salon.com would publish it tells you what kind of credibility they have. The worst part is that I predicted, amongst my family and friends, that if people like Freak Show Jenner were glorified, it was just a matter of time before pedophiles were. Even I didn't imagine that it would happen so quickly. We're living in the most immoral of times. -- Charmed Tuna
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 21:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <srjgd983.ajdf@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #329560 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/29/15, 1:37 PM, in article sfgbnch74.jg@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 10/29/15, 11:05 AM, in article >>> prWdnSd3JYWe_a_LnZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@bresnan.com, "GreyCloud" <cumulus@mist.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>>> You're the one who is is the wannabe martyr. "Christians don't agree with >>>>>> me. Wah, wah! Government come in and force them to give me what I want >>>>>> and make them agree with me!" >>>>>> >>>>>> Get over yourself, crank. >>>>> >>>>> You've earned my respect, ronb. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I have to concur on that one. >>>> Jed thinks the current mode that civilization is in is somehow modern? >>>> Even the pedophiles are now demanding they have a right to screw your >>>> children. >>> >>> You mean like it says in the Bible? >>> >>> <http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/says_about/pedophilia.html> >>> >>> The Bible is a book that promotes pedophilia! But that has nothing to do >>> with equality for gays! >>> >>>> And the pooch humpers also want their right to screw the pooch. The list is >>>> getting longer. Myself, I know the laws are still on the books against that >>>> stuff. >>> >>> In many states there are, unfortunately, no laws against bestiality! >>> >>> <http://wp.me/p3dI4z-1CH> >>> ----- >>> Bestiality Is Legal in the Same States That Ban Same-Sex >>> Marriage >>> ... >>> The states which do not criminalize Bestiality, yet ban Same >>> Sex Marriage are as follows: >>> >>> Kentucky; Montana; New Jersey; Nevada; Ohio; Texas; Virginia; West >>> Virginia; and Wyoming (Note: New Jersey does permit Civil Unions.) >>> ----- >>> >>> To be fair that is from 2013 and is now outdated: at the very least same sex >>> marriage is no longer outlawed. The push by, largely, the religious right to >>> control other people has been beaten in this area. >>> >> >> salon.com recently published an article sympathetic to child molestors. >> The Left is truly disgusting. > > I suspect you are misrepresenting the article but by all means do post a > link. I do find this one which speaks of the topic but in no way shows any > sympathy for child molesters or child molestation: > > <http://www.salon.com/2015/09/21/im_a_pedophile_but_not_a_monster/> > > Maybe there is another though? > http://www.salon.com/2015/10/27/the_pedophile_i_could_not_help_he_was_not_a_monster_or_a_molester_the_system_destroyed_him_anyway/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-30 01:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <shfggr8s.gj@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #329578 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/29/15, 2:53 PM, in article srjgd983.ajdf@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 10/29/15, 1:37 PM, in article sfgbnch74.jg@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 10/29/15, 11:05 AM, in article >>>>> prWdnSd3JYWe_a_LnZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@bresnan.com, "GreyCloud" >>>>> <cumulus@mist.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>> You're the one who is is the wannabe martyr. "Christians don't agree >>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>> me. Wah, wah! Government come in and force them to give me what I want >>>>>>>> and make them agree with me!" >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Get over yourself, crank. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You've earned my respect, ronb. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> I have to concur on that one. >>>>>> Jed thinks the current mode that civilization is in is somehow modern? >>>>>> Even the pedophiles are now demanding they have a right to screw your >>>>>> children. >>>>> >>>>> You mean like it says in the Bible? >>>>> >>>>> <http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/says_about/pedophilia.html> >>>>> >>>>> The Bible is a book that promotes pedophilia! But that has nothing to do >>>>> with equality for gays! >>>>> >>>>>> And the pooch humpers also want their right to screw the pooch. The list >>>>>> is >>>>>> getting longer. Myself, I know the laws are still on the books against >>>>>> that >>>>>> stuff. >>>>> >>>>> In many states there are, unfortunately, no laws against bestiality! >>>>> >>>>> <http://wp.me/p3dI4z-1CH> >>>>> ----- >>>>> Bestiality Is Legal in the Same States That Ban Same-Sex >>>>> Marriage >>>>> ... >>>>> The states which do not criminalize Bestiality, yet ban Same >>>>> Sex Marriage are as follows: >>>>> >>>>> Kentucky; Montana; New Jersey; Nevada; Ohio; Texas; Virginia; West >>>>> Virginia; and Wyoming (Note: New Jersey does permit Civil Unions.) >>>>> ----- >>>>> >>>>> To be fair that is from 2013 and is now outdated: at the very least same >>>>> sex >>>>> marriage is no longer outlawed. The push by, largely, the religious right >>>>> to >>>>> control other people has been beaten in this area. >>>>> >>>> >>>> salon.com recently published an article sympathetic to child molestors. >>>> The Left is truly disgusting. >>> >>> I suspect you are misrepresenting the article but by all means do post a >>> link. I do find this one which speaks of the topic but in no way shows any >>> sympathy for child molesters or child molestation: >>> >>> <http://www.salon.com/2015/09/21/im_a_pedophile_but_not_a_monster/> >>> >>> Maybe there is another though? >>> >> >> http://www.salon.com/2015/10/27/the_pedophile_i_could_not_help_he_was_not_a_mo >> nster_or_a_molester_the_system_destroyed_him_anyway/ >> > ----- > But Jacob had not touched a child. > ----- > > You claimed they were showing sympathy for "child molesters or child > molestation" but there is not a word in that article where they do so. They > do note he was reaching out to a child and arrested for it. And no claim is > made that this should not have been the case. So it was not even defending > possible child molestation. > > They even talk about programs to REDUCE child sexual abuse... actively > working AGAINST the very thing you say they show sympathy for! > Weasel words here: "There is a very important distinction between pedophiles and child molesters." Followed later by: <quote> I tell friends, colleagues, and strangers I meet (as I believe birthday parties present an excellent opportunity to enlighten people on the matter), when they fail to understand why I am sympathetic towards pedophiles, ???How would you feel if you couldn???t ever have sex with anyone? What if you also couldn???t look at the porn you liked because it was illegal, and couldn???t confide in anyone for support???? By this point, most people begin nodding their heads in agreement. </quote> Yeah, right. But you agree with her. You must be a perv. The cops should check out your "daycare" business for sure.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-30 01:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sfheu0.afea@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #329611 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/29/15, 6:18 PM, in article shfggr8s.gj@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > ... > >>>>>> salon.com recently published an article sympathetic to child molestors. >>>>>> The Left is truly disgusting. >>>>> >>>>> I suspect you are misrepresenting the article but by all means do post a >>>>> link. I do find this one which speaks of the topic but in no way shows any >>>>> sympathy for child molesters or child molestation: >>>>> >>>>> <http://www.salon.com/2015/09/21/im_a_pedophile_but_not_a_monster/> >>>>> >>>>> Maybe there is another though? >>>>> >>>> >>>> http://www.salon.com/2015/10/27/the_pedophile_i_could_not_help_he_was_not_a_ >>>> mo >>>> nster_or_a_molester_the_system_destroyed_him_anyway/ >>>> >>> ----- >>> But Jacob had not touched a child. >>> ----- >>> >>> You claimed they were showing sympathy for "child molesters or child >>> molestation" but there is not a word in that article where they do so. They >>> do note he was reaching out to a child and arrested for it. And no claim is >>> made that this should not have been the case. So it was not even defending >>> possible child molestation. >>> >>> They even talk about programs to REDUCE child sexual abuse... actively >>> working AGAINST the very thing you say they show sympathy for! >>> >> >> Weasel words here: >> >> "There is a very important distinction between pedophiles and child >> molesters." > > Right. > >> Followed later by: >> >> <quote> >> I tell friends, colleagues, and strangers I meet (as I believe birthday >> parties present an excellent opportunity to enlighten people on the >> matter), when they fail to understand why I am sympathetic towards >> pedophiles, ???How would you feel if you couldn???t ever have sex with >> anyone? What if you also couldn???t look at the porn you liked because >> it was illegal, and couldn???t confide in anyone for support???? By this >> point, most people begin nodding their heads in agreement. >> </quote> >> >> Yeah, right. >> But you agree with her. You must be a perv. The cops should check >> out your "daycare" business for sure. > > I called you out on your misrepresentation of the article and your respond > with that. Wow. > > You spouted off about something without knowing a thing about it. > > This lunatic at salon makes a distinction between pedophiles and child molesters, and you agree with her. Fine.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-30 02:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <srn39a.af3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #329638 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/29/15, 6:58 PM, in article sfheu0.afea@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 10/29/15, 6:18 PM, in article shfggr8s.gj@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> ... >>> >>>>>>>> salon.com recently published an article sympathetic to child molestors. >>>>>>>> The Left is truly disgusting. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I suspect you are misrepresenting the article but by all means do post a >>>>>>> link. I do find this one which speaks of the topic but in no way shows >>>>>>> any >>>>>>> sympathy for child molesters or child molestation: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <http://www.salon.com/2015/09/21/im_a_pedophile_but_not_a_monster/> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Maybe there is another though? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.salon.com/2015/10/27/the_pedophile_i_could_not_help_he_was_not_ >>>>>> a_ >>>>>> mo >>>>>> nster_or_a_molester_the_system_destroyed_him_anyway/ >>>>>> >>>>> ----- >>>>> But Jacob had not touched a child. >>>>> ----- >>>>> >>>>> You claimed they were showing sympathy for "child molesters or child >>>>> molestation" but there is not a word in that article where they do so. They >>>>> do note he was reaching out to a child and arrested for it. And no claim is >>>>> made that this should not have been the case. So it was not even defending >>>>> possible child molestation. >>>>> >>>>> They even talk about programs to REDUCE child sexual abuse... actively >>>>> working AGAINST the very thing you say they show sympathy for! >>>>> >>>> >>>> Weasel words here: >>>> >>>> "There is a very important distinction between pedophiles and child >>>> molesters." >>> >>> Right. >>> >>>> Followed later by: >>>> >>>> <quote> >>>> I tell friends, colleagues, and strangers I meet (as I believe birthday >>>> parties present an excellent opportunity to enlighten people on the >>>> matter), when they fail to understand why I am sympathetic towards >>>> pedophiles, ???How would you feel if you couldn???t ever have sex with >>>> anyone? What if you also couldn???t look at the porn you liked because >>>> it was illegal, and couldn???t confide in anyone for support???? By this >>>> point, most people begin nodding their heads in agreement. >>>> </quote> >>>> >>>> Yeah, right. >>>> But you agree with her. You must be a perv. The cops should check >>>> out your "daycare" business for sure. >>> >>> I called you out on your misrepresentation of the article and your respond >>> with that. Wow. >>> >>> You spouted off about something without knowing a thing about it. >> >> This lunatic at salon makes a distinction between pedophiles and child >> molesters, and you agree with her. Fine. > > As I said, you spouted off without knowing what you were talking about and > misrepresented the article. Why do you feel the need to turn every mistake > of yours into a circus? You goofed. You thought of the article and made a > comment from memory. You were wrong. Had you just said so right off the bat > you would not have put yourself in a position to make such a fool of > yourself now. > Keep digging yourself a deeper hole, pervert.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-30 05:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhsnvbc83.gjai@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #329650 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/29/15, 7:32 PM, in article srn39a.af3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 10/29/15, 6:58 PM, in article sfheu0.afea@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 10/29/15, 6:18 PM, in article shfggr8s.gj@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> ... >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> salon.com recently published an article sympathetic to child >>>>>>>>>> molestors. >>>>>>>>>> The Left is truly disgusting. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I suspect you are misrepresenting the article but by all means do post >>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>> link. I do find this one which speaks of the topic but in no way shows >>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>> sympathy for child molesters or child molestation: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <http://www.salon.com/2015/09/21/im_a_pedophile_but_not_a_monster/> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Maybe there is another though? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.salon.com/2015/10/27/the_pedophile_i_could_not_help_he_was_no >>>>>>>> t_ >>>>>>>> a_ >>>>>>>> mo >>>>>>>> nster_or_a_molester_the_system_destroyed_him_anyway/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>> But Jacob had not touched a child. >>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You claimed they were showing sympathy for "child molesters or child >>>>>>> molestation" but there is not a word in that article where they do so. >>>>>>> They >>>>>>> do note he was reaching out to a child and arrested for it. And no claim >>>>>>> is >>>>>>> made that this should not have been the case. So it was not even >>>>>>> defending >>>>>>> possible child molestation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They even talk about programs to REDUCE child sexual abuse... actively >>>>>>> working AGAINST the very thing you say they show sympathy for! >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Weasel words here: >>>>>> >>>>>> "There is a very important distinction between pedophiles and child >>>>>> molesters." >>>>> >>>>> Right. >>>>> >>>>>> Followed later by: >>>>>> >>>>>> <quote> >>>>>> I tell friends, colleagues, and strangers I meet (as I believe birthday >>>>>> parties present an excellent opportunity to enlighten people on the >>>>>> matter), when they fail to understand why I am sympathetic towards >>>>>> pedophiles, ???How would you feel if you couldn???t ever have sex with >>>>>> anyone? What if you also couldn???t look at the porn you liked because >>>>>> it was illegal, and couldn???t confide in anyone for support???? By this >>>>>> point, most people begin nodding their heads in agreement. >>>>>> </quote> >>>>>> >>>>>> Yeah, right. >>>>>> But you agree with her. You must be a perv. The cops should check >>>>>> out your "daycare" business for sure. >>>>> >>>>> I called you out on your misrepresentation of the article and your respond >>>>> with that. Wow. >>>>> >>>>> You spouted off about something without knowing a thing about it. >>>> >>>> This lunatic at salon makes a distinction between pedophiles and child >>>> molesters, and you agree with her. Fine. >>> >>> As I said, you spouted off without knowing what you were talking about and >>> misrepresented the article. Why do you feel the need to turn every mistake >>> of yours into a circus? You goofed. You thought of the article and made a >>> comment from memory. You were wrong. Had you just said so right off the bat >>> you would not have put yourself in a position to make such a fool of >>> yourself now. >>> >> >> Keep digging yourself a deeper hole, pervert. >> >> > See: now you feel the need to call me names because you not only > misrepresented the article (easy enough to do, you referred to it just based > on your memory) but when you were called out you behaved poorly. > > Now instead of just admitting your error you push a meta-debate circus and > sink to name calling. It is a poor showing from you. > Seriously, are you on crack?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-30 09:04 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <w4jxpdm04bmf.m332fv4azpku$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #329663 |
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 05:16:11 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 10/29/15, 7:32 PM, in article srn39a.af3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 10/29/15, 6:58 PM, in article sfheu0.afea@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 10/29/15, 6:18 PM, in article shfggr8s.gj@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> ... >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> salon.com recently published an article sympathetic to child >>>>>>>>>>> molestors. >>>>>>>>>>> The Left is truly disgusting. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I suspect you are misrepresenting the article but by all means do post >>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>> link. I do find this one which speaks of the topic but in no way shows >>>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>>> sympathy for child molesters or child molestation: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> <http://www.salon.com/2015/09/21/im_a_pedophile_but_not_a_monster/> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Maybe there is another though? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://www.salon.com/2015/10/27/the_pedophile_i_could_not_help_he_was_no >>>>>>>>> t_ >>>>>>>>> a_ >>>>>>>>> mo >>>>>>>>> nster_or_a_molester_the_system_destroyed_him_anyway/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>>> But Jacob had not touched a child. >>>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You claimed they were showing sympathy for "child molesters or child >>>>>>>> molestation" but there is not a word in that article where they do so. >>>>>>>> They >>>>>>>> do note he was reaching out to a child and arrested for it. And no claim >>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>> made that this should not have been the case. So it was not even >>>>>>>> defending >>>>>>>> possible child molestation. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> They even talk about programs to REDUCE child sexual abuse... actively >>>>>>>> working AGAINST the very thing you say they show sympathy for! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Weasel words here: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "There is a very important distinction between pedophiles and child >>>>>>> molesters." >>>>>> >>>>>> Right. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Followed later by: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <quote> >>>>>>> I tell friends, colleagues, and strangers I meet (as I believe birthday >>>>>>> parties present an excellent opportunity to enlighten people on the >>>>>>> matter), when they fail to understand why I am sympathetic towards >>>>>>> pedophiles, ???How would you feel if you couldn???t ever have sex with >>>>>>> anyone? What if you also couldn???t look at the porn you liked because >>>>>>> it was illegal, and couldn???t confide in anyone for support???? By this >>>>>>> point, most people begin nodding their heads in agreement. >>>>>>> </quote> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yeah, right. >>>>>>> But you agree with her. You must be a perv. The cops should check >>>>>>> out your "daycare" business for sure. >>>>>> >>>>>> I called you out on your misrepresentation of the article and your respond >>>>>> with that. Wow. >>>>>> >>>>>> You spouted off about something without knowing a thing about it. >>>>> >>>>> This lunatic at salon makes a distinction between pedophiles and child >>>>> molesters, and you agree with her. Fine. >>>> >>>> As I said, you spouted off without knowing what you were talking about and >>>> misrepresented the article. Why do you feel the need to turn every mistake >>>> of yours into a circus? You goofed. You thought of the article and made a >>>> comment from memory. You were wrong. Had you just said so right off the bat >>>> you would not have put yourself in a position to make such a fool of >>>> yourself now. >>>> >>> >>> Keep digging yourself a deeper hole, pervert. >>> >>> >> See: now you feel the need to call me names because you not only >> misrepresented the article (easy enough to do, you referred to it just based >> on your memory) but when you were called out you behaved poorly. >> >> Now instead of just admitting your error you push a meta-debate circus and >> sink to name calling. It is a poor showing from you. >> > > Seriously, are you on crack? Snit's drug of choice is huffing glue. That's why his bawls are droopy. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-30 09:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D258EC00.62147%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #329663 |
On 10/29/15, 10:16 PM, in article fhsnvbc83.gjai@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
<owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>> See: now you feel the need to call me names because you not only
>> misrepresented the article (easy enough to do, you referred to it just based
>> on your memory) but when you were called out you behaved poorly.
>>
>> Now instead of just admitting your error you push a meta-debate circus and
>> sink to name calling. It is a poor showing from you.
>>
>
> Seriously, are you on crack?
Good grief... you post with less to say than anyone else I know. Why not
*TRY* to be an adult and just admit you misrepresented the article:
Owl:
-----
salon.com recently published an article sympathetic to child molestors.
The Left is truly disgusting.
-----
Not only did solon.com not do as you claimed, but even if they had your
conclusion would be unsupported (they do not speak for the left, nor have
the Democrats embraced such a position). You just fabricated nonsense.
Also why don't you try to figure out what your *actual* rights are:
Owl:
-----
| You do NOT have a right to not be offended.
Of course I do.
-----
Utter nonsense. And you feeling so entitled leads you to believe in what you
call "atheist privilege" - another fabrication of your own mind.
Are you competing with cc to see who can be the most absurd with their
trolling?
--
* OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 21 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web