Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #330042 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-31 22:00 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-11-02 13:37 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 160 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 22:00 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-01 06:21 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 09:09 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-01 17:03 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 10:12 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-01 17:32 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 10:36 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-01 17:42 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 10:57 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-01 18:05 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 11:27 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-01 18:48 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 12:12 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-01 19:20 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 12:24 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 14:54 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 13:54 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 14:38 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 13:26 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 14:36 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-01 19:42 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 13:29 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 15:37 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 13:55 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 14:30 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 12:42 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 15:06 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 13:36 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 14:24 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 12:42 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 15:08 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 13:31 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 14:22 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-01 19:39 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 13:40 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 12:43 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 15:09 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 13:38 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 15:57 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 14:09 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 07:15 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 10:40 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 08:09 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 12:27 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 10:31 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 12:49 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 11:22 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 11:30 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 10:52 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-02 19:02 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 12:06 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 11:16 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 14:50 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 13:44 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 17:41 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-02 17:43 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 18:39 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 07:51 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 09:15 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 10:48 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 10:50 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 13:54 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-02 23:10 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 00:17 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 18:44 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 19:30 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 19:57 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 20:47 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 21:50 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-02 12:44 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 12:55 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 17:41 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 14:46 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 13:49 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-02 12:56 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 13:27 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 13:06 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-03 07:42 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 06:55 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-04 23:28 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 15:53 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 19:55 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 09:19 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 12:20 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 13:38 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 10:56 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 14:42 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 15:51 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 17:12 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-04 00:31 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 19:37 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 17:46 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 18:50 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 19:36 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 00:55 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 01:08 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 01:45 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 02:09 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 02:30 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 02:45 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 03:07 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 03:54 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 05:24 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-03 04:30 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 07:45 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 09:01 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 17:52 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 19:31 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 08:51 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 09:02 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 09:25 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 19:55 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 20:49 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 21:54 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 03:03 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 03:35 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 04:42 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 17:46 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 19:26 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 08:29 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 13:35 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 14:48 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-03 12:03 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 15:21 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 15:53 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 17:14 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 17:28 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 18:34 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 18:53 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-03 13:02 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 17:08 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-03 13:41 -0600
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 08:36 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 08:49 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 09:20 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 14:17 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 09:24 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 12:30 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 13:36 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 19:36 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 14:49 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 17:09 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 16:24 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 19:55 -0600
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-03 07:13 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-03 13:02 -0600
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-02 19:53 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-02 15:21 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 13:40 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-02 12:46 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 12:51 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 17:38 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 09:59 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 10:27 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-02 18:31 +0100
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 12:48 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 11:18 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 13:38 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 11:13 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 13:37 -0500
Page 8 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8]
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 14:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1b2vr$a0u$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #330694 |
On 2015-11-03 2:09 PM, Snit wrote: > On 11/3/15, 11:36 AM, in article n1aumc$mls$4@dont-email.me, "Slimer" > <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > >>>> It's in their fucking religion. Stop defending it just because you know >>>> a couple of friendly Muslims. Muslims who don't believe that it is their >>>> right to rape infidel women and girls are in the minority OR are waiting >>>> until their numbers become significant enough to gain the right to do >>>> such things. As long as they remain a minority, they know that they will >>>> be punished for doing so but significant enough numbers means that the >>>> Sharia law is implemented and it does not believe that it is a crime to >>>> force sex on an infidel. >>> >>> You have already been shown the passages from the Bible which ALSO support >>> atrocities and immoral behavior. >> >> Which all coincidentally come from the passages that have been added by >> whoever was in charge. I exclusively read the apostles as should >> everyone else. > > What you think the religion SHOULD be does not change what it is and how > people use it. Many Muslims think those who use their religion to condone > violence are completely wrong. Find them for me. -- Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 17:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1bb6t$e7l$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #330724 |
On 2015-11-03 3:42 PM, Snit wrote: > On 11/3/15, 12:49 PM, in article n1b2vr$a0u$5@dont-email.me, "Slimer" > <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > >> On 2015-11-03 2:09 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 11/3/15, 11:36 AM, in article n1aumc$mls$4@dont-email.me, "Slimer" >>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> >>>>>> It's in their fucking religion. Stop defending it just because you know >>>>>> a couple of friendly Muslims. Muslims who don't believe that it is their >>>>>> right to rape infidel women and girls are in the minority OR are waiting >>>>>> until their numbers become significant enough to gain the right to do >>>>>> such things. As long as they remain a minority, they know that they will >>>>>> be punished for doing so but significant enough numbers means that the >>>>>> Sharia law is implemented and it does not believe that it is a crime to >>>>>> force sex on an infidel. >>>>> >>>>> You have already been shown the passages from the Bible which ALSO support >>>>> atrocities and immoral behavior. >>>> >>>> Which all coincidentally come from the passages that have been added by >>>> whoever was in charge. I exclusively read the apostles as should >>>> everyone else. >>> >>> What you think the religion SHOULD be does not change what it is and how >>> people use it. Many Muslims think those who use their religion to condone >>> violence are completely wrong. >> >> Find them for me. >> > The passages? I have pointed out somewhere around 2000 to you already. The people who condemn the violence and DON'T secretly support them. In Canada, Muslims condemn the violent acts all the time and we discover that they either are or support terrorism later. -- Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-02 16:24 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <91688368-dec0-4b79-89fb-929e2f7c402d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #330494 |
On Monday, November 2, 2015 at 4:00:26 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 11/2/15, 3:46 PM, in article n18ovb$771$1@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" > <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > > > On 2015-11-02 3:49 PM, Snit wrote: > > > > < snip > > > > >>> For my part, I like black people. They're generally friendlier and more > >>> accepting of me than everyone else and get along with Muslims quite well. > >>> The fact that I can't stand the refugees and believe that they don't deserve > >>> any kind of shelter in Europe doesn't make me a bigot, it makes me logical > >>> considering we've all seen what those same refugees are doing TO the > >>> countries which are accepting them. > >> > >> What are these people supposed to do? They are living in a war torn area of > >> the world where they have little chance to have decent lives. > > > > So what gives them the right to rape women, to death in some cases, in > > the countries that accept and welcome them? > > Nobody said anyone had such a right, but your question implies they all do > this. That is absurd. Whined the hypocrite who didn't just 'imply' but actually said "the Republican party in the US"... not just *some* of the party, "the" party... "caters to racism and other forms of bigotry". It's "interesting" how you afford yourself a leeway you won't give to another, isn't it, you weasel? "True... but the Republican party in the US clearly caters to racism and other forms of bigotry..." - Snit Your absolute statement here 'implies all' more than his statement does. Yes, I know... that you often can't comprehend what you've read is... as expected from you... everyone else's fault. We're all aware we must all pay that price when dealing with you. It's bad enough that society has to pay the rest of your way but, for a guy who *claims* he supports "personal responsibility" this falls clearly into the horsesh*t category.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-02 19:55 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <slrnn3g50n.4s0.jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
| In reply to | #330536 |
On 2015-11-03, Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday, November 2, 2015 at 4:00:26 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: >> On 11/2/15, 3:46 PM, in article n18ovb$771$1@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" >> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >> >> > On 2015-11-02 3:49 PM, Snit wrote: >> > >> > < snip > >> > >> >>> For my part, I like black people. They're generally friendlier and more >> >>> accepting of me than everyone else and get along with Muslims quite well. >> >>> The fact that I can't stand the refugees and believe that they don't deserve >> >>> any kind of shelter in Europe doesn't make me a bigot, it makes me logical >> >>> considering we've all seen what those same refugees are doing TO the >> >>> countries which are accepting them. >> >> >> >> What are these people supposed to do? They are living in a war torn area of >> >> the world where they have little chance to have decent lives. I dunno... perhaps seek refuge closer to home in countries that are more culturally in step with them? If nothing else, Europe just seems like an unneccesary schlep. [deletia]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 07:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <56385e9b$0$4222$c3e8da3$12bcf670@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #330573 |
On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 19:55:35 -0600, JEDIDIAH wrote: > On 2015-11-03, Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Monday, November 2, 2015 at 4:00:26 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: >>> On 11/2/15, 3:46 PM, in article n18ovb$771$1@dont-email.me, "Charmed >>> Tuna" >>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> >>> > On 2015-11-02 3:49 PM, Snit wrote: >>> > >>> > < snip > >>> > >>> >>> For my part, I like black people. They're generally friendlier and >>> >>> more accepting of me than everyone else and get along with Muslims >>> >>> quite well. The fact that I can't stand the refugees and believe >>> >>> that they don't deserve any kind of shelter in Europe doesn't make >>> >>> me a bigot, it makes me logical considering we've all seen what >>> >>> those same refugees are doing TO the countries which are accepting >>> >>> them. >>> >> >>> >> What are these people supposed to do? They are living in a war torn >>> >> area of the world where they have little chance to have decent >>> >> lives. > > I dunno... perhaps seek refuge closer to home in countries that are > more > culturally in step with them? > > If nothing else, Europe just seems like an unneccesary schlep. > > [deletia] "in countries more culturally in step with them". Like...? There are no muslim countries that aren't in turmoil due to the fallout from the Arab Spring, the Iraq war, or aren't havens for repressive regimes. Cablegate destabilized the region. -- -v Kernel:4.1.5-sd Desktop:Xfce 4.12.2 Distro:Linux Mint 17.2 Rafaela
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 13:02 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <slrnn3i15q.nca.jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
| In reply to | #330599 |
On 2015-11-03, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: > On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 19:55:35 -0600, JEDIDIAH wrote: > >> On 2015-11-03, Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Monday, November 2, 2015 at 4:00:26 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: >>>> On 11/2/15, 3:46 PM, in article n18ovb$771$1@dont-email.me, "Charmed >>>> Tuna" >>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>> >>>> > On 2015-11-02 3:49 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> > >>>> > < snip > >>>> > >>>> >>> For my part, I like black people. They're generally friendlier and >>>> >>> more accepting of me than everyone else and get along with Muslims >>>> >>> quite well. The fact that I can't stand the refugees and believe >>>> >>> that they don't deserve any kind of shelter in Europe doesn't make >>>> >>> me a bigot, it makes me logical considering we've all seen what >>>> >>> those same refugees are doing TO the countries which are accepting >>>> >>> them. >>>> >> >>>> >> What are these people supposed to do? They are living in a war torn >>>> >> area of the world where they have little chance to have decent >>>> >> lives. >> >> I dunno... perhaps seek refuge closer to home in countries that are >> more >> culturally in step with them? >> >> If nothing else, Europe just seems like an unneccesary schlep. >> >> [deletia] > > "in countries more culturally in step with them". > > Like...? Jordan, Saudia Arabia, Egypt, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan. [deletia]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-02 19:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <srbgngjd8.jaid@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #330424 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 11/2/15, 12:02 PM, in article sdf84fa.jfu@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 11/2/15, 10:49 AM, in article n187iv$sl7$4@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" >>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> >>>>>> Conservatism is not racism. >>>>> >>>>> True... but the Republican party in the US clearly caters to racism and >>>>> other forms of bigotry, and does so much more than the Democrats. >>>> >>>> Please show how they "clearly" cater to racism. >>> >>> I think this is pretty clear: <https://youtu.be/O0TYwTjRqb0> >>> >> >> Ah, yes. The Ed Schultz show. Back before MSNBC fired his ass for >> being too leftist even by their insane standards. >> > Look at the conservatives in this group and how they talk about blacks and > Muslims. Do you see liberals sharing such ignorant and bigoted views? If so, > where? > I see Al Sharpton as a rascist of the highest order -- himself, at least until recently -- also an employee of MSNBC. I see MSNBC employee Melissa Harris-Perry as a racist posing as a journalist. I see Cenk Uygur, former MSNBC employee, as a racist Armenian Holocaust denier and a left-wing kook. So MSNBC seems to be more of a hotbed of racism than is the Republican party. I see the Democratic Party embracing the blatantly racist Black Lives Matter organization. I see the race card being played at every opportunity by the Left in general, to the extent that blacks cannot *be* "racist" but that being a white male, or a conservative, makes you automatically racist by definition. Finally, I see you spouting this same nonsense over and over as if it were an accepted Truth, while simultaneously blind to that *obvious* aggressive, violent racism and bigotry among those you view as fellow "victims." And let's just look at what is said in the video you linked. That was from 2012, and was in response to John Sununu's [later cowardly retracted] assertion that Colin Powell had voiced support for Obama simply because he was black. That original assertion reflected the truth, but RINO Wilkerson uses it as an opportunity to blast "fellow" Republicans as racist.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-02 15:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n18ggm$52a$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #330435 |
"owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote in message news:srbgngjd8.jaid@rooftop.invalid... > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 11/2/15, 12:02 PM, in article sdf84fa.jfu@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >> > I see Al Sharpton as a rascist of the highest order -- himself, > at least until recently -- also an employee of MSNBC. I see MSNBC > employee Melissa Harris-Perry as a racist posing as a journalist. > I see Cenk Uygur, former MSNBC employee, as a racist Armenian Holocaust > denier and a left-wing kook. So MSNBC seems to be more of a hotbed > of racism than is the Republican party. > One of the benefits of working at MSNBC is that you no longer have to pay taxes. <quote> 4 MSNBC hosts plagued by tax debt By Dylan Byers 04/22/15 01:48 PM EDT The National Review reports that Touré Neblett, the co-host of MSNBC's The Cycle, owes more than $59,000 in taxes, according to public records. New York issued a state tax warrant to Neblett and his wife for $46,862.68... These revelations come one week after the Winston-Salem Journal reported that MSNBC weekend host Melissa Harris-Perry and her husband owe about $70,000 in delinquent taxes to the Internal Revenue Service. The IRS filed a tax lien on the Perrys on April 6 for the outstanding debt.... Then there is the Rev. Al Sharpton. As The New York Times reported in November, Sharpton had "more than $4.5 million in current state and federal tax liens against him and his for-profit businesses." The same report found that Sharpton's taxes with the state of New York were growing, even as he and his National Action Network "repeatedly failed to pay travel agencies, hotels and landlords." </quote> http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2015/04/4-msnbc-hosts-plagued-by-tax-debt-205942 If I owed 1/10th of what Sharpton owes in taxes then my ass would have been a jail a long time ago. How much you want to bet that Sharpton will *never* pay back the taxes (and debts) he owes? -- "Knowing 'Word or Excel' is a hindrance." <KLJcr.103621$4c4.97437@news.usenetserver.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-02 13:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D25D184C.626B1%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #330435 |
On 11/2/15, 12:53 PM, in article srbgngjd8.jaid@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 11/2/15, 12:02 PM, in article sdf84fa.jfu@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 11/2/15, 10:49 AM, in article n187iv$sl7$4@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" >>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> Conservatism is not racism. >>>>>> >>>>>> True... but the Republican party in the US clearly caters to racism and >>>>>> other forms of bigotry, and does so much more than the Democrats. >>>>> >>>>> Please show how they "clearly" cater to racism. >>>> >>>> I think this is pretty clear: <https://youtu.be/O0TYwTjRqb0> >>>> >>> >>> Ah, yes. The Ed Schultz show. Back before MSNBC fired his ass for >>> being too leftist even by their insane standards. >>> >> Look at the conservatives in this group and how they talk about blacks and >> Muslims. Do you see liberals sharing such ignorant and bigoted views? If so, >> where? >> > I see Al Sharpton as a rascist of the highest order I have not seen him posting in COLA. Can you point to his posts? Heck, I have no seen anyone even reference him EXCEPT for you and maybe some other conservatives. And below you spew a bunch of unsupported accusation. Not really interested. > -- himself, > at least until recently -- also an employee of MSNBC. I see MSNBC > employee Melissa Harris-Perry as a racist posing as a journalist. > I see Cenk Uygur, former MSNBC employee, as a racist Armenian Holocaust > denier and a left-wing kook. So MSNBC seems to be more of a hotbed > of racism than is the Republican party. > > I see the Democratic Party embracing the blatantly racist Black > Lives Matter organization. You do not even suggest how they MIGHT be racist, no less show any support. And the question was about those who posted to COLA. > I see the race card being played at every > opportunity by the Left in general, to the extent that blacks cannot > *be* "racist" but that being a white male, or a conservative, makes > you automatically racist by definition. Link? Quote? I mean, really, who said ANYONE is racist by definition? Nobody in COLA. > Finally, I see you spouting > this same nonsense over and over as if it were an accepted Truth, while > simultaneously blind to that *obvious* aggressive, violent racism and > bigotry among those you view as fellow "victims." Again, no support. > And let's just look at what is said in the video you linked. That was > from 2012, and was in response to John Sununu's [later cowardly retracted] > assertion that Colin Powell had voiced support for Obama simply because > he was black. That original assertion reflected the truth You show no support for this. Nor will you. > , but RINO > Wilkerson uses it as an opportunity to blast "fellow" Republicans > as racist. Multiple Republicans have noted the racism and bigotry in their party. And then we can look at the signs they carry at rallies and the like. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-02 12:46 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <01d92d12-22d3-4b01-b651-7d8ed5b27acc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #330442 |
On Monday, November 2, 2015 at 3:40:39 PM UTC-5, Snit wrote: > > > Link? Quote? I mean, really, who said ANYONE is racist by definition? > Nobody in COLA. "the Republican party in the US clearly caters to racism and other forms of bigotry" - Snit
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-02 12:51 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <c0738064-408b-47e9-9c81-2b6eec53449d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #330435 |
On Monday, November 2, 2015 at 12:53:57 PM UTC-7, owl wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > On 11/2/15, 12:02 PM, in article sdf84fa.jfu@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>> On 11/2/15, 10:49 AM, in article n187iv$sl7$4@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" > >>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > >>> > >>>>>> Conservatism is not racism. > >>>>> > >>>>> True... but the Republican party in the US clearly caters to racism and > >>>>> other forms of bigotry, and does so much more than the Democrats. > >>>> > >>>> Please show how they "clearly" cater to racism. > >>> > >>> I think this is pretty clear: <https://youtu.be/O0TYwTjRqb0> > >>> > >> > >> Ah, yes. The Ed Schultz show. Back before MSNBC fired his ass for > >> being too leftist even by their insane standards. > >> > > Look at the conservatives in this group and how they talk about blacks and > > Muslims. Do you see liberals sharing such ignorant and bigoted views? If so, > > where? > > > I see Al Sharpton as a rascist of the highest order -- himself, > at least until recently -- also an employee of MSNBC. I consider him to be a race baiter, which is worse in my opinion. While the 'Democratic party' appears to have embraced this guy (who has a pretty bizarre history) lately, he's not part of it in any official capacity that I'm aware of. > I see MSNBC > employee Melissa Harris-Perry as a racist posing as a journalist. > I see Cenk Uygur, former MSNBC employee, as a racist Armenian Holocaust > denier and a left-wing kook. So MSNBC seems to be more of a hotbed > of racism than is the Republican party. They aren't representatives of the 'Democratic party', either. I suggest you leave these kinds of 'arguments' to people like Snit. > I see the Democratic Party embracing the blatantly racist Black > Lives Matter organization. I see the race card being played at every > opportunity by the Left in general, to the extent that blacks cannot > *be* "racist" but that being a white male, or a conservative, makes > you automatically racist by definition. But only so by people that are as patently ridiculous as Snit often is in his 'thinking' and, even then, only done to those who are as 'sheeple' as he continually proves himself to be. Those that can actually think don't fall for this kind of silly, juvenile crap. > Finally, I see you spouting > this same nonsense over and over as if it were an accepted Truth, while > simultaneously blind to that *obvious* aggressive, violent racism and > bigotry among those you view as fellow "victims." Screeching something over and over is the best (only?) way to attempt to push a loon agenda... news at 11 ;) > And let's just look at what is said in the video you linked. That was > from 2012, and was in response to John Sununu's [later cowardly retracted] > assertion that Colin Powell had voiced support for Obama simply because > he was black. That original assertion reflected the truth, but RINO > Wilkerson uses it as an opportunity to blast "fellow" Republicans > as racist. Telling, to me, is the fact that the "Republican party" did not agree with or stand behind Sununu's suggestion (it was not an "assertion", he merely suggested the idea as something to "wonder" about).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-02 17:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n18og7$582$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #330435 |
On 2015-11-02 2:53 PM, owl wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 11/2/15, 12:02 PM, in article sdf84fa.jfu@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 11/2/15, 10:49 AM, in article n187iv$sl7$4@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" >>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> Conservatism is not racism. >>>>>> >>>>>> True... but the Republican party in the US clearly caters to racism and >>>>>> other forms of bigotry, and does so much more than the Democrats. >>>>> >>>>> Please show how they "clearly" cater to racism. >>>> >>>> I think this is pretty clear: <https://youtu.be/O0TYwTjRqb0> >>>> >>> >>> Ah, yes. The Ed Schultz show. Back before MSNBC fired his ass for >>> being too leftist even by their insane standards. >>> >> Look at the conservatives in this group and how they talk about blacks and >> Muslims. Do you see liberals sharing such ignorant and bigoted views? If so, >> where? >> > I see Al Sharpton as a rascist of the highest order -- himself, > at least until recently -- also an employee of MSNBC. I see MSNBC > employee Melissa Harris-Perry as a racist posing as a journalist. > I see Cenk Uygur, former MSNBC employee, as a racist Armenian Holocaust > denier and a left-wing kook. So MSNBC seems to be more of a hotbed > of racism than is the Republican party. > > I see the Democratic Party embracing the blatantly racist Black > Lives Matter organization. I see the race card being played at every > opportunity by the Left in general, to the extent that blacks cannot > *be* "racist" but that being a white male, or a conservative, makes > you automatically racist by definition. Finally, I see you spouting > this same nonsense over and over as if it were an accepted Truth, while > simultaneously blind to that *obvious* aggressive, violent racism and > bigotry among those you view as fellow "victims." > > And let's just look at what is said in the video you linked. That was > from 2012, and was in response to John Sununu's [later cowardly retracted] > assertion that Colin Powell had voiced support for Obama simply because > he was black. That original assertion reflected the truth, but RINO > Wilkerson uses it as an opportunity to blast "fellow" Republicans > as racist. That black cunt on MTV said that "reverse racism" doesn't exist and that it is impossible for a black person to be racist. It's stupidity, pushed by your friendly neighbourhood leftist idiot. -- Charmed Tuna
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-02 09:59 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <e56c5c6d-5c8b-45ce-80ca-400189fa328c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #330383 |
On Monday, November 2, 2015 at 10:27:24 AM UTC-7, Charmed Tuna wrote: > On 2015-11-02 11:09 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Monday, November 2, 2015 at 8:40:31 AM UTC-7, Charmed Tuna wrote: > >> On 2015-11-02 10:15 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Saturday, October 31, 2015 at 11:00:53 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>> http://www.jta.org/?p=1086888> > >>>> > >>>> What other candidate is willing to be this direct and honest. Amazing. > >>>> > >>>> For those in COLA who attack Muslims *this* is what I wish you would learn > >>>> from. > >>> > >>> The topic broached was actually regarding religious discrimination (specifically the Muslim religion), not racism. Notably, it was Bernie who *immediately* steered it towards the political pay dirt of racism, not her. He's a white politician in the U.S., did you expect him to say that he's *for* racism in 2015? He also knows that 'doing everything he can' will actually be pretty limited so it's easy to make these kinds of statements. If he gets elected, unless he personally goes out and starts shooting holdovers, watch how little he actually does towards removing that stain (and I agree it is a stain that needs removing). This is, most likely, the reason that statement didn't raise any applause when he said it here. Even these kids know it's just more of the same 'feel good' talk we've all heard our entire lives from politicians. As someone who believes that words have meaning for a reason, I believe it wasn't helpful to anyone other than himself that he sought to blur the line > be > >> tween religious discrimination and racism but politicians do that kind of disingenuous crap. > >> > >> Personally, I'm sick of people saying "this is racist," especially when > >> they apply it to things which don't have anything to do with racism at > >> all. Besides, even if I were a racist, it's my right to be one. I have a > >> right to believe what I want about blacks, whites, Natives and Muslims > >> and so long as I don't ask anyone to take up arms and hurt anyone for no > >> reason, there is nothing wrong with believing whatever I do. > > > > I agree, it's your right to believe whatever you want, it's when those beliefs get translated into unreasonable actions that the problem arises. What comprises "unreasonable" will probably always be at issue. > > And I would never advocate someone hurting another over their beliefs. Hurt comes in many forms. > >> Nowadays, > >> if I make a "racist" comment and someone points it out, I simply reply > >> "Absolutely, now fuck off." I have no interest in getting their approval > >> and want even less to hear about their idiotic liberalism. > > > > This cuts both ways, the person not wanting to listen to your beliefs has every right to tell you about it. I don't generally bother because I figure people see it and act accordingly. Someone like Snit, OTOH, has proven he will use it for his own agenda. While he's mentioned it, he's not hammering you over bigotry... and you're even flatly arguing in favor of the types he pretends to abhor. With me, he falsely created it and hammered me often. For that reason I don't believe bigotry bothers him at all; he views it as just another tool he can use to attempt to silence someone who proves his BS is BS. > > Snit is a liberal and I think that it's clear to pretty much anyone > here. I'm clearly not talking about his views, I'm talking about his actions, many of which are disingenuous. > He can believe whatever he wants but I'm free to believe that his > liberalism is a mental issue which demands a herd mentality as well. HIs mental issues have little to do with his claim of being a liberal. > >> Lastly, I want to say that it is refreshing to find that there are so > >> many conservative individuals in this newsgroup. Liberals truly make me > >> sick to my stomach and make me lose all hope for humanity. > > > > Don't get confused that I'm down with racism or that I'm even all that hard core a conservative; despite Snit's dishonest attempts to the contrary, I'm not either. > > Conservatism is not racism. Of course not. The way the political terms are often (mis)used, though, is ridiculous. One could make many arguments that "prove" Snit is conservative, and they would all be as equally silly as the stupid BS he pushes. I was surprised PK didn't include the rest of Snit's statements... in particular: "I support personal responsibility." I'd love to know how Snit believes he does that given how often he's proven otherwise on usenet and given how it's obvious he's living off the efforts of others when he's obviously capable of contributing. We all know we'll never see anything remotely approaching an honest answer from him on this and it has nothing to do with his allegedly being a liberal.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-02 10:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D25CEAF9.62630%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #330339 |
On 11/2/15, 8:40 AM, in article n18017$t3q$1@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > On 2015-11-02 10:15 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> On Saturday, October 31, 2015 at 11:00:53 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>> http://www.jta.org/?p=1086888> >>> >>> What other candidate is willing to be this direct and honest. Amazing. >>> >>> For those in COLA who attack Muslims *this* is what I wish you would learn >>> from. >> >> The topic broached was actually regarding religious discrimination >> (specifically the Muslim religion), not racism. Notably, it was Bernie who >> *immediately* steered it towards the political pay dirt of racism, not her. >> He's a white politician in the U.S., did you expect him to say that he's >> *for* racism in 2015? He also knows that 'doing everything he can' will >> actually be pretty limited so it's easy to make these kinds of statements. If >> he gets elected, unless he personally goes out and starts shooting holdovers, >> watch how little he actually does towards removing that stain (and I agree it >> is a stain that needs removing). This is, most likely, the reason that >> statement didn't raise any applause when he said it here. Even these kids >> know it's just more of the same 'feel good' talk we've all heard our entire >> lives from politicians. As someone who believes that words have meaning for a >> reason, I believe it wasn't helpful to anyone other than himself that he >> sought to blur the line be tween religious discrimination and racism but >> politicians do that kind of disingenuous crap. > > Personally, I'm sick of people saying "this is racist," especially when > they apply it to things which don't have anything to do with racism at > all. Besides, even if I were a racist, it's my right to be one. It is your right to be racist or have other forms of bigotry, I agree. With Muslims and Jews there is overlap between race and religion, but I agree people should be careful with their terms. Still, I am against any form of bigotry. > I have a right to believe what I want about blacks, whites, Natives and > Muslims and so long as I don't ask anyone to take up arms and hurt anyone for > no reason, there is nothing wrong with believing whatever I do. I can go with you have a right to believe as you wish... does not mean there is nothing wrong with such beliefs though. > Nowadays, if I make a "racist" comment and someone points it out, I simply > reply "Absolutely, now fuck off." I have no interest in getting their approval > and want even less to hear about their idiotic liberalism. > > Lastly, I want to say that it is refreshing to find that there are so many > conservative individuals in this newsgroup. Liberals truly make me sick to my > stomach and make me lose all hope for humanity. I support equal rights and a strong connection between hard work / productivity and financial reward. I support personal responsibility. I denounce special entitlements and absurd handouts by the government to those who are not in need. This makes me a "liberal"... which I am OK with - but I find it sad how many are against such things. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-02 18:31 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n186gh$lq2$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #330382 |
The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: <> > I support equal rights and a strong connection between hard work / > productivity and financial reward. This is hilarious, coming from Snit Michael Glasser. The parasite who hasn't done any gainful work in years and squanders the income of his wife in order to troll usenet 24/7
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-02 12:48 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n187h2$sl7$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #330390 |
On 2015-11-02 12:31 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > > <> >> I support equal rights and a strong connection between hard work / >> productivity and financial reward. > > This is hilarious, coming from Snit Michael Glasser. The parasite who hasn't > done any gainful work in years and squanders the income of his wife in order > to troll usenet 24/7 Neither have you, Klöwn. We're all looking forward to you revealing that great code you've been working on. Maybe, if you show it to your kids, they might stop being embarrassed of their lazy, useless dad and stop buying Macs to dissociate themselves from you. -- Charmed Tuna
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-02 11:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D25CF702.6266B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #330399 |
On 11/2/15, 10:48 AM, in article n187h2$sl7$3@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > On 2015-11-02 12:31 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: >> >> <> >>> I support equal rights and a strong connection between hard work / >>> productivity and financial reward. >> >> This is hilarious, coming from Snit Michael Glasser. The parasite who hasn't >> done any gainful work in years and squanders the income of his wife in order >> to troll usenet 24/7 > > Neither have you, Klöwn. We're all looking forward to you revealing that > great code you've been working on. Maybe, if you show it to your kids, > they might stop being embarrassed of their lazy, useless dad and stop > buying Macs to dissociate themselves from you. Peter is simply lashing out because he feels poorly about himself. The more he attacks someone the more jealous he is of the person - and I am his main target. This indicates he does not believe a word he says about me. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-02 13:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n18afd$9mh$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #330410 |
On 2015-11-02 1:18 PM, Snit wrote: > On 11/2/15, 10:48 AM, in article n187h2$sl7$3@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" > <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > >> On 2015-11-02 12:31 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: >>> >>> <> >>>> I support equal rights and a strong connection between hard work / >>>> productivity and financial reward. >>> >>> This is hilarious, coming from Snit Michael Glasser. The parasite who hasn't >>> done any gainful work in years and squanders the income of his wife in order >>> to troll usenet 24/7 >> >> Neither have you, Klöwn. We're all looking forward to you revealing that >> great code you've been working on. Maybe, if you show it to your kids, >> they might stop being embarrassed of their lazy, useless dad and stop >> buying Macs to dissociate themselves from you. > > Peter is simply lashing out because he feels poorly about himself. > > The more he attacks someone the more jealous he is of the person - and I am > his main target. This indicates he does not believe a word he says about me. Poor Peter the Klöwn. It must be difficult for him to live with the burden of being Germany's happiest person. -- Charmed Tuna
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-02 11:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D25CF5CA.6265F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #330390 |
On 11/2/15, 10:31 AM, in article n186gh$lq2$3@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > > <> >> I support equal rights and a strong connection between hard work / >> productivity and financial reward. > > This is hilarious, coming from Snit Michael Glasser. The parasite who hasn't > done any gainful work in years and squanders the income of his wife in order > to troll usenet 24/7 > > See: you feel so poorly about yourself you post things like the above. The sad thing is you think it speaks of me when it is ALL about you. Seriously, none of what you posted says ANYTHING about me. Not a word. You are crying for help, publicly. So go get it. Find a professional to help you with your issues. Please! -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-02 13:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n18aca$9mh$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #330406 |
On 2015-11-02 1:13 PM, Snit wrote: > On 11/2/15, 10:31 AM, in article n186gh$lq2$3@dont-email.me, "Peter > Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > >> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: >> >> <> >>> I support equal rights and a strong connection between hard work / >>> productivity and financial reward. >> >> This is hilarious, coming from Snit Michael Glasser. The parasite who hasn't >> done any gainful work in years and squanders the income of his wife in order >> to troll usenet 24/7 >> >> > See: you feel so poorly about yourself you post things like the above. The > sad thing is you think it speaks of me when it is ALL about you. Seriously, > none of what you posted says ANYTHING about me. Not a word. > > You are crying for help, publicly. So go get it. Find a professional to help > you with your issues. Please! Peter the Klöwn already looked for help in his country but most are just as accurate as he is. He was diagnosed as being "too pleasant." -- Charmed Tuna
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web