Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #327971 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-23 12:10 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-10-30 07:55 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 101 — 9 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 12:10 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 21:14 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 14:35 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 21:58 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 15:16 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 22:46 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 15:53 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 22:57 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 16:11 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 23:46 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 21:10 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 21:14 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 21:58 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 20:57 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 21:55 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 14:40 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 21:53 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 15:34 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 22:43 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 20:52 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-24 18:06 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-24 12:17 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-24 23:03 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-24 16:27 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-24 23:41 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-24 16:57 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 00:11 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-24 17:17 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 00:25 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-24 17:47 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 12:54 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 10:36 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 18:23 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 14:32 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 18:46 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 16:45 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 21:08 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 11:45 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 14:54 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 19:18 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 15:23 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 19:34 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 15:37 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 19:58 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 16:01 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 20:11 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 16:11 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 20:27 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 16:27 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 20:38 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 16:47 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 21:02 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 17:08 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 21:31 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 17:33 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 21:51 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 18:07 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 22:28 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:17 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:32 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:20 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 17:28 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 21:37 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:21 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:15 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:14 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 20:23 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:13 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 17:25 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 17:30 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 20:06 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 20:12 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:22 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:11 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 20:13 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 08:44 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 00:39 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 20:42 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-25 20:58 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 03:53 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:46 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 03:56 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 23:57 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 04:46 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 22:22 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 05:43 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 13:05 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 21:11 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 04:48 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 22:27 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 05:51 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 13:05 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 15:47 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 15:10 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-27 22:46 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-10-29 00:31 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-29 07:10 -0500
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 08:36 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-29 14:46 +0100
Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-29 09:41 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 07:55 -0700
Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 17:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D252C60F.61716%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #328427 |
On 10/25/15, 5:39 PM, in article asd39r.gjiua@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 10/25/15, 12:58 PM, in article fsd.kbkc93x@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>>> I don't need to join the school of snit to watch him schooling you on every >>>> topic. >>>> >>> You mean how he schooled me in math class? >>> >>> I had written this: >>> Message-ID: <mbjcur96.kdi@rooftop.invalid> >>> [owl]: >>> "Now that's funny. 154 rounds in 264 seconds with a semi-auto AR-15. >>> That's 1 round every 1.714 seconds." >>> >>> So Snit came up with this nonsense: >>> Message-ID: <D1A24EE6.4D65B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> [Snit]: >>> "And it would NOT be even an AVERAGE of "1 round every 1.714 seconds", it >>> would be an AVERAGE of 1 round every 0.583 seconds." >>> >>> See, school is NOT boring. It's full of comedy! >> >> Yes! When you could not get the concept of an average. That WAS funny! >> >> I also goofed on math and then openly admitted it. Yup. I made a mistake. >> But not so funny when someone openly admits it. >> >> I did. You NEVER did. >> >> And you won't now, will you? A simple "no" would have done. > When you provide proof that the rounds fired at Sandy Hook were *not* > fired at a rate of *exactly* 1 round every 1.714 seconds, which was very > likely the case given that the so-called shooter was a known Assburger > who may well have been fixated on that number, Rainman that he was, > then we can take it as an average. LOL! ... -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-26 03:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sdgl.bmxj85@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #328431 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/25/15, 5:39 PM, in article asd39r.gjiua@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 10/25/15, 12:58 PM, in article fsd.kbkc93x@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>> I don't need to join the school of snit to watch him schooling you on every >>>>> topic. >>>>> >>>> You mean how he schooled me in math class? >>>> >>>> I had written this: >>>> Message-ID: <mbjcur96.kdi@rooftop.invalid> >>>> [owl]: >>>> "Now that's funny. 154 rounds in 264 seconds with a semi-auto AR-15. >>>> That's 1 round every 1.714 seconds." >>>> >>>> So Snit came up with this nonsense: >>>> Message-ID: <D1A24EE6.4D65B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> [Snit]: >>>> "And it would NOT be even an AVERAGE of "1 round every 1.714 seconds", it >>>> would be an AVERAGE of 1 round every 0.583 seconds." >>>> >>>> See, school is NOT boring. It's full of comedy! >>> >>> Yes! When you could not get the concept of an average. That WAS funny! >>> >>> I also goofed on math and then openly admitted it. Yup. I made a mistake. >>> But not so funny when someone openly admits it. >>> >>> I did. You NEVER did. >>> >>> And you won't now, will you? > > A simple "no" would have done. > >> When you provide proof that the rounds fired at Sandy Hook were *not* >> fired at a rate of *exactly* 1 round every 1.714 seconds, which was very >> likely the case given that the so-called shooter was a known Assburger >> who may well have been fixated on that number, Rainman that he was, >> then we can take it as an average. > > LOL! > So you have no evidence to back up your wild claim that it was not exactly 1 round every 1.714 seconds. Got it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 23:57 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <1x32cjfbontks.uhm0hk8l11hh.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #328469 |
On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 03:56:39 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 10/25/15, 5:39 PM, in article asd39r.gjiua@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 10/25/15, 12:58 PM, in article fsd.kbkc93x@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> I don't need to join the school of snit to watch him schooling you on every >>>>>> topic. >>>>>> >>>>> You mean how he schooled me in math class? >>>>> >>>>> I had written this: >>>>> Message-ID: <mbjcur96.kdi@rooftop.invalid> >>>>> [owl]: >>>>> "Now that's funny. 154 rounds in 264 seconds with a semi-auto AR-15. >>>>> That's 1 round every 1.714 seconds." >>>>> >>>>> So Snit came up with this nonsense: >>>>> Message-ID: <D1A24EE6.4D65B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>> [Snit]: >>>>> "And it would NOT be even an AVERAGE of "1 round every 1.714 seconds", it >>>>> would be an AVERAGE of 1 round every 0.583 seconds." >>>>> >>>>> See, school is NOT boring. It's full of comedy! >>>> >>>> Yes! When you could not get the concept of an average. That WAS funny! >>>> >>>> I also goofed on math and then openly admitted it. Yup. I made a mistake. >>>> But not so funny when someone openly admits it. >>>> >>>> I did. You NEVER did. >>>> >>>> And you won't now, will you? >> >> A simple "no" would have done. >> >>> When you provide proof that the rounds fired at Sandy Hook were *not* >>> fired at a rate of *exactly* 1 round every 1.714 seconds, which was very >>> likely the case given that the so-called shooter was a known Assburger >>> who may well have been fixated on that number, Rainman that he was, >>> then we can take it as an average. >> >> LOL! >> > > So you have no evidence to back up your wild claim that it was not exactly > 1 round every 1.714 seconds. Got it. I backed it up already. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-26 04:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fs3f0.pa@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #328470 |
Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: > On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 03:56:39 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 10/25/15, 5:39 PM, in article asd39r.gjiua@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 10/25/15, 12:58 PM, in article fsd.kbkc93x@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> I don't need to join the school of snit to watch him schooling you on every >>>>>>> topic. >>>>>>> >>>>>> You mean how he schooled me in math class? >>>>>> >>>>>> I had written this: >>>>>> Message-ID: <mbjcur96.kdi@rooftop.invalid> >>>>>> [owl]: >>>>>> "Now that's funny. 154 rounds in 264 seconds with a semi-auto AR-15. >>>>>> That's 1 round every 1.714 seconds." >>>>>> >>>>>> So Snit came up with this nonsense: >>>>>> Message-ID: <D1A24EE6.4D65B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>> [Snit]: >>>>>> "And it would NOT be even an AVERAGE of "1 round every 1.714 seconds", it >>>>>> would be an AVERAGE of 1 round every 0.583 seconds." >>>>>> >>>>>> See, school is NOT boring. It's full of comedy! >>>>> >>>>> Yes! When you could not get the concept of an average. That WAS funny! >>>>> >>>>> I also goofed on math and then openly admitted it. Yup. I made a mistake. >>>>> But not so funny when someone openly admits it. >>>>> >>>>> I did. You NEVER did. >>>>> >>>>> And you won't now, will you? >>> >>> A simple "no" would have done. >>> >>>> When you provide proof that the rounds fired at Sandy Hook were *not* >>>> fired at a rate of *exactly* 1 round every 1.714 seconds, which was very >>>> likely the case given that the so-called shooter was a known Assburger >>>> who may well have been fixated on that number, Rainman that he was, >>>> then we can take it as an average. >>> >>> LOL! >>> >> >> So you have no evidence to back up your wild claim that it was not exactly >> 1 round every 1.714 seconds. Got it. > > I backed it up already. > A suspicious person might wonder why a question addressed to Snit as "you" gets answered by Small Crotch as "I" ...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 22:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D25306B0.61762%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #328475 |
On 10/25/15, 9:46 PM, in article fs3f0.pa@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >> On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 03:56:39 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 10/25/15, 5:39 PM, in article asd39r.gjiua@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 10/25/15, 12:58 PM, in article fsd.kbkc93x@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't need to join the school of snit to watch him schooling you on >>>>>>>> every >>>>>>>> topic. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> You mean how he schooled me in math class? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I had written this: >>>>>>> Message-ID: <mbjcur96.kdi@rooftop.invalid> >>>>>>> [owl]: >>>>>>> "Now that's funny. 154 rounds in 264 seconds with a semi-auto AR-15. >>>>>>> That's 1 round every 1.714 seconds." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So Snit came up with this nonsense: >>>>>>> Message-ID: <D1A24EE6.4D65B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>> [Snit]: >>>>>>> "And it would NOT be even an AVERAGE of "1 round every 1.714 >>>>>>> seconds", it >>>>>>> would be an AVERAGE of 1 round every 0.583 seconds." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> See, school is NOT boring. It's full of comedy! >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes! When you could not get the concept of an average. That WAS funny! >>>>>> >>>>>> I also goofed on math and then openly admitted it. Yup. I made a mistake. >>>>>> But not so funny when someone openly admits it. >>>>>> >>>>>> I did. You NEVER did. >>>>>> >>>>>> And you won't now, will you? >>>> >>>> A simple "no" would have done. >>>> >>>>> When you provide proof that the rounds fired at Sandy Hook were *not* >>>>> fired at a rate of *exactly* 1 round every 1.714 seconds, which was very >>>>> likely the case given that the so-called shooter was a known Assburger >>>>> who may well have been fixated on that number, Rainman that he was, >>>>> then we can take it as an average. >>>> >>>> LOL! >>>> >>> >>> So you have no evidence to back up your wild claim that it was not exactly >>> 1 round every 1.714 seconds. Got it. >> >> I backed it up already. >> > > A suspicious person might wonder why a question addressed to Snit as "you" > gets answered by Small Crotch as "I" ... > Because "Nobody" is trolling. That was easy. Next. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-26 05:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <segoeapd.kgi@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #328477 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/25/15, 9:46 PM, in article fs3f0.pa@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 03:56:39 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 10/25/15, 5:39 PM, in article asd39r.gjiua@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 10/25/15, 12:58 PM, in article fsd.kbkc93x@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I don't need to join the school of snit to watch him schooling you on >>>>>>>>> every >>>>>>>>> topic. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You mean how he schooled me in math class? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I had written this: >>>>>>>> Message-ID: <mbjcur96.kdi@rooftop.invalid> >>>>>>>> [owl]: >>>>>>>> "Now that's funny. 154 rounds in 264 seconds with a semi-auto AR-15. >>>>>>>> That's 1 round every 1.714 seconds." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So Snit came up with this nonsense: >>>>>>>> Message-ID: <D1A24EE6.4D65B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>>> [Snit]: >>>>>>>> "And it would NOT be even an AVERAGE of "1 round every 1.714 >>>>>>>> seconds", it >>>>>>>> would be an AVERAGE of 1 round every 0.583 seconds." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> See, school is NOT boring. It's full of comedy! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes! When you could not get the concept of an average. That WAS funny! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I also goofed on math and then openly admitted it. Yup. I made a mistake. >>>>>>> But not so funny when someone openly admits it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I did. You NEVER did. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And you won't now, will you? >>>>> >>>>> A simple "no" would have done. >>>>> >>>>>> When you provide proof that the rounds fired at Sandy Hook were *not* >>>>>> fired at a rate of *exactly* 1 round every 1.714 seconds, which was very >>>>>> likely the case given that the so-called shooter was a known Assburger >>>>>> who may well have been fixated on that number, Rainman that he was, >>>>>> then we can take it as an average. >>>>> >>>>> LOL! >>>>> >>>> >>>> So you have no evidence to back up your wild claim that it was not exactly >>>> 1 round every 1.714 seconds. Got it. >>> >>> I backed it up already. >>> >> >> A suspicious person might wonder why a question addressed to Snit as "you" >> gets answered by Small Crotch as "I" ... >> > > Because "Nobody" is trolling. That was easy. Next. > Occam's Razor says otherwise.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-26 13:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D253D57C.6183B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #328481 |
On 10/25/15, 10:43 PM, in article segoeapd.kgi@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: ... >>> A suspicious person might wonder why a question addressed to Snit as "you" >>> gets answered by Small Crotch as "I" ... >>> >> >> Because "Nobody" is trolling. That was easy. Next. >> > Occam's Razor says otherwise. > Let me guess: everyone is Snit. Tell me you were hinting at something else. Just try. :) Then see if you can figure out what an *average* is. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 21:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D252F5E9.6175A%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #328469 |
On 10/25/15, 8:56 PM, in article sdgl.bmxj85@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> I had written this: >>>>> Message-ID: <mbjcur96.kdi@rooftop.invalid> >>>>> [owl]: >>>>> "Now that's funny. 154 rounds in 264 seconds with a semi-auto AR-15. >>>>> That's 1 round every 1.714 seconds." >>>>> >>>>> So Snit came up with this nonsense: >>>>> Message-ID: <D1A24EE6.4D65B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>> [Snit]: >>>>> "And it would NOT be even an AVERAGE of "1 round every 1.714 seconds", >>>>> it >>>>> would be an AVERAGE of 1 round every 0.583 seconds." >>>>> >>>>> See, school is NOT boring. It's full of comedy! >>>> >>>> Yes! When you could not get the concept of an average. That WAS funny! >>>> >>>> I also goofed on math and then openly admitted it. Yup. I made a mistake. >>>> But not so funny when someone openly admits it. >>>> >>>> I did. You NEVER did. >>>> >>>> And you won't now, will you? >> >> A simple "no" would have done. >> >>> When you provide proof that the rounds fired at Sandy Hook were *not* >>> fired at a rate of *exactly* 1 round every 1.714 seconds, which was very >>> likely the case given that the so-called shooter was a known Assburger >>> who may well have been fixated on that number, Rainman that he was, >>> then we can take it as an average. >> >> LOL! >> > > So you have no evidence to back up your wild claim that it was not exactly > 1 round every 1.714 seconds. Got it. LOL! You cannot help but prove me correct. You have no clue what an average is. None. You assume that the average should be accepted as the EXACT times... just idiocy from you. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-26 04:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <soa3.faop4@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #328473 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/25/15, 8:56 PM, in article sdgl.bmxj85@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>>>>> I had written this: >>>>>> Message-ID: <mbjcur96.kdi@rooftop.invalid> >>>>>> [owl]: >>>>>> "Now that's funny. 154 rounds in 264 seconds with a semi-auto AR-15. >>>>>> That's 1 round every 1.714 seconds." >>>>>> >>>>>> So Snit came up with this nonsense: >>>>>> Message-ID: <D1A24EE6.4D65B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>> [Snit]: >>>>>> "And it would NOT be even an AVERAGE of "1 round every 1.714 seconds", >>>>>> it >>>>>> would be an AVERAGE of 1 round every 0.583 seconds." >>>>>> >>>>>> See, school is NOT boring. It's full of comedy! >>>>> >>>>> Yes! When you could not get the concept of an average. That WAS funny! >>>>> >>>>> I also goofed on math and then openly admitted it. Yup. I made a mistake. >>>>> But not so funny when someone openly admits it. >>>>> >>>>> I did. You NEVER did. >>>>> >>>>> And you won't now, will you? >>> >>> A simple "no" would have done. >>> >>>> When you provide proof that the rounds fired at Sandy Hook were *not* >>>> fired at a rate of *exactly* 1 round every 1.714 seconds, which was very >>>> likely the case given that the so-called shooter was a known Assburger >>>> who may well have been fixated on that number, Rainman that he was, >>>> then we can take it as an average. >>> >>> LOL! >>> >> >> So you have no evidence to back up your wild claim that it was not exactly >> 1 round every 1.714 seconds. Got it. > > LOL! You cannot help but prove me correct. You have no clue what an average > is. None. You assume that the average should be accepted as the EXACT > times... just idiocy from you. > I see you sorted your nyms out. Too bad you still have no evidence to support your wild claims.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 22:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D25307D1.61765%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #328476 |
On 10/25/15, 9:48 PM, in article soa3.faop4@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 10/25/15, 8:56 PM, in article sdgl.bmxj85@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>>>>>> I had written this: >>>>>>> Message-ID: <mbjcur96.kdi@rooftop.invalid> >>>>>>> [owl]: >>>>>>> "Now that's funny. 154 rounds in 264 seconds with a semi-auto AR-15. >>>>>>> That's 1 round every 1.714 seconds." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So Snit came up with this nonsense: >>>>>>> Message-ID: <D1A24EE6.4D65B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>> [Snit]: >>>>>>> "And it would NOT be even an AVERAGE of "1 round every 1.714 >>>>>>> seconds", >>>>>>> it >>>>>>> would be an AVERAGE of 1 round every 0.583 seconds." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> See, school is NOT boring. It's full of comedy! >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes! When you could not get the concept of an average. That WAS funny! >>>>>> >>>>>> I also goofed on math and then openly admitted it. Yup. I made a mistake. >>>>>> But not so funny when someone openly admits it. >>>>>> >>>>>> I did. You NEVER did. >>>>>> >>>>>> And you won't now, will you? >>>> >>>> A simple "no" would have done. >>>> >>>>> When you provide proof that the rounds fired at Sandy Hook were *not* >>>>> fired at a rate of *exactly* 1 round every 1.714 seconds, which was very >>>>> likely the case given that the so-called shooter was a known Assburger >>>>> who may well have been fixated on that number, Rainman that he was, >>>>> then we can take it as an average. >>>> >>>> LOL! >>>> >>> >>> So you have no evidence to back up your wild claim that it was not exactly >>> 1 round every 1.714 seconds. Got it. >> >> LOL! You cannot help but prove me correct. You have no clue what an average >> is. None. You assume that the average should be accepted as the EXACT >> times... just idiocy from you. >> > I see you sorted your nyms out. Too bad you still have no evidence to support > your wild claims. > Gee, my nyms: Snit. THAT was easy. But clearly too complex for you. Comes down to you pushing crap to try to obfuscate the fact you cannot figure out what an average is. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-26 05:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fsdmgjvid93.fjie@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #328479 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/25/15, 9:48 PM, in article soa3.faop4@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 10/25/15, 8:56 PM, in article sdgl.bmxj85@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>> I had written this: >>>>>>>> Message-ID: <mbjcur96.kdi@rooftop.invalid> >>>>>>>> [owl]: >>>>>>>> "Now that's funny. 154 rounds in 264 seconds with a semi-auto AR-15. >>>>>>>> That's 1 round every 1.714 seconds." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So Snit came up with this nonsense: >>>>>>>> Message-ID: <D1A24EE6.4D65B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>>> [Snit]: >>>>>>>> "And it would NOT be even an AVERAGE of "1 round every 1.714 >>>>>>>> seconds", >>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>> would be an AVERAGE of 1 round every 0.583 seconds." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> See, school is NOT boring. It's full of comedy! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes! When you could not get the concept of an average. That WAS funny! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I also goofed on math and then openly admitted it. Yup. I made a mistake. >>>>>>> But not so funny when someone openly admits it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I did. You NEVER did. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And you won't now, will you? >>>>> >>>>> A simple "no" would have done. >>>>> >>>>>> When you provide proof that the rounds fired at Sandy Hook were *not* >>>>>> fired at a rate of *exactly* 1 round every 1.714 seconds, which was very >>>>>> likely the case given that the so-called shooter was a known Assburger >>>>>> who may well have been fixated on that number, Rainman that he was, >>>>>> then we can take it as an average. >>>>> >>>>> LOL! >>>>> >>>> >>>> So you have no evidence to back up your wild claim that it was not exactly >>>> 1 round every 1.714 seconds. Got it. >>> >>> LOL! You cannot help but prove me correct. You have no clue what an average >>> is. None. You assume that the average should be accepted as the EXACT >>> times... just idiocy from you. >>> >> I see you sorted your nyms out. Too bad you still have no evidence to support >> your wild claims. >> > > Gee, my nyms: Snit. > > THAT was easy. But clearly too complex for you. > > Comes down to you pushing crap to try to obfuscate the fact you cannot > figure out what an average is. > You need prove that every shot did not occur exactly 1.714 seconds apart in order to support your claim that the ratio does not represent an exact rate. Get busy proving it already, and quit whining. Did mommy promise you that you could willy nilly make scientific claims without having to break a sweat backing them up?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-26 13:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D253D581.6183B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #328482 |
On 10/25/15, 10:51 PM, in article fsdmgjvid93.fjie@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: .. >> Comes down to you pushing crap to try to obfuscate the fact you cannot >> figure out what an average is. > > You need prove that every shot did not occur exactly 1.714 seconds apart > in order to support your claim that the ratio does not represent an exact > rate. And here, again, is proof that you do not have any clue what an average is. OK. ... -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 15:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e5264dbd-c55a-4ab2-8495-3693d1fc466c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #328031 |
On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 4:34:41 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
> On 10/23/15, 2:53 PM, in article fscmvk93.izd@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> >> On 10/23/15, 2:14 PM, in article sdfmnbjc83.03pp@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
> >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Well, I haven't been feeding him lately. I've had him on a 30-day
> >>> plonk, which seems to have expired about two hours ago. It'll probably
> >>> end up going permafrost though, because I doubt he'll ever cease to be
> >>> a jackass and learn how to take a beating like a man.
> >>
> >> Ah, you think the "proper" way to take your beating is to run away for 30
> >> days and not if someone rudely corrects you again you will never talk to
> >> them again. Waaaaah!
> >>
> >> LOL!
> >>
> >> Anyway, did not even remember what debate you were running from. Now I see
> >> you were whining my quoting style with Peter was completely confusing to you
> >> ("completely wacky, intentionally deceptive and annoying, and unlike
> >> anything ever seen from a normal human.")
> >>
> >> After a month rest are you better able to understand?
> >>
> >> Peter Köhlmann:
> >> -----
> >> | For example, if I modified a BSD variant and tried to pass it
> >> | off as "Linux" to people I would be stopped. I know of no
> >> | example of this but I think it is pretty obvious the license
> >> | holders would not allow this.
> >> BSD allows such sheenigans
> >> -----
> >> The BSD license has no power to override trademarks and "allow" this.
> >>
> >> Message-ID: l98q2g$nj1$1@dont-email.me
> >> <http://goo.gl/zvo4fv>
> >>
> >
> > Wrong thread.
>
> This is the exact right thread I meant to ask the question in.
So you're trying to suggest that it's your obsession with PK that has made people avoid associating with you? If anything I'd say PK's responses were more credit worthy. Even young Andrzej Matuch was whining about 'too much Snit in the soup' after seeing PK's posts ;)
> The fact it
> references another is not in question. But after a month of relaxing from
> your humiliation of yourself do you understand the quote style?
>
> Pretty much you have noted if I beat you down again you will kill filter me
> for life. I am happy if you do.
It appears you're alienating everyone anyway so what's one more to worry about.
> To be fair, I should give you another chance...
LOL! You're hilarious ;)
Serious question: Where will you go when COLA becomes like CSMA? As your reputation precedes you to the extent it now does, it seems it'd be difficult for you to gain traction anywhere.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 15:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1f9fb35a-fae2-4473-af7a-5cb5b847e575@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #327996 |
On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 3:40:31 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 10/23/15, 2:14 PM, in article sdfmnbjc83.03pp@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > > Well, I haven't been feeding him lately. I've had him on a 30-day > > plonk, which seems to have expired about two hours ago. It'll probably > > end up going permafrost though, because I doubt he'll ever cease to be > > a jackass and learn how to take a beating like a man. Permafrost. LOL! > Ah, you think the "proper" way to take your beating is to run away for 30 > days Said the hypocrite who has run away from the 'beatings' (which are merely me rubbing his nose in his "wrongs") that I've given him for years ;) Something does seem to be different, though, even you must see it, Snit. Another thing I noticed recently was how many posters no longer post here anymore; I was surprised, it's actually quite a lot. What are you going to do when it becomes like CSMA. You've built up such a notorious reputation that even that KDE guy was able to peg you almost immediately... so anyone will be able to do so.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-27 22:46 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0pcq1$42t$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #328014 |
On 10/23/2015 6:10 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > Another thing I noticed recently was how many posters no longer > post here anymore; I was surprised, it's actually quite a lot. It is a lot. I know because I've been here since June 2004, and I occasionally made lists of active regs to use in posts. The following were regs at one time, and are now gone: Rick (pRick) ray carter (raytard) Tim Fairchild (Dim) Ray Ingles rapskat AZ Nomad (AZ Nonads) Mark Kent Kier Richard Rasker Thad Ghost In The Machine billwg Hadron Homer High Plains Thumper Jerry McBride flatfish Robin T. Cox Schestowitz (Spamowitz) spike1 Erik Funkenbusch Tim Smith alt Daeron Ghost in the Machine Jesse Hughes Jim Richardson John Bailo Liam Slider mlw Sinister Midget
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 00:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n0rpcj$r22$1@tattoovampire.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #329042 |
DFS wrote: > The following were regs at one time, and are now gone flatty's still around under one nym or another, but the rest have headed off to wherever serious Linux discussions are still held. I wonder where that is?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 07:10 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nu243b5o6281qfbpgpheqaamm676eteift@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #329327 |
Tattoo Vampire wrote: > dumfsck wrote: >> >> The following were regs at one time, and are now gone > >flatty's still around under one nym or another, but the rest have headed >off to wherever serious Linux discussions are still held. I wonder where >that is? Hopefully, "Hadron" is doing his "true Linux advocacy" in hell. -- "Too many clueless weenines like the COLA faithful havent a CLUE about the GPL and consequences." - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 08:36 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0t3nr$f8q$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #329367 |
On 2015-10-29 8:10 AM, chrisv wrote: > Tattoo Vampire wrote: > >> dumfsck wrote: >>> >>> The following were regs at one time, and are now gone >> >> flatty's still around under one nym or another, but the rest have headed >> off to wherever serious Linux discussions are still held. I wonder where >> that is? > > Hopefully, "Hadron" is doing his "true Linux advocacy" in hell. With comments like those, you'll soon find out. -- Charmed Tuna
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 14:46 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n0t7s9$ukh$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #329367 |
chrisv wrote: > Tattoo Vampire wrote: > >> dumfsck wrote: >>> >>> The following were regs at one time, and are now gone >> >>flatty's still around under one nym or another, but the rest have headed >>off to wherever serious Linux discussions are still held. I wonder where >>that is? > > Hopefully, "Hadron" is doing his "true Linux advocacy" in hell. > Did he scream long enough before?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 09:41 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0t7he$tcv$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #329042 |
On 10/27/2015 10:46 PM, DFS wrote: > On 10/23/2015 6:10 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> Another thing I noticed recently was how many posters no longer >> post here anymore; I was surprised, it's actually quite a lot. > > > It is a lot. I know because I've been here since June 2004, and I > occasionally made lists of active regs to use in posts. > > The following were regs at one time, and are now gone: > > Rick (pRick) > ray carter (raytard) > Tim Fairchild (Dim) > Ray Ingles > rapskat > AZ Nomad (AZ Nonads) > Mark Kent > Kier > Richard Rasker > Thad > Ghost In The Machine > billwg > Hadron > Homer > High Plains Thumper > Jerry McBride > flatfish > Robin T. Cox > Schestowitz (Spamowitz) > spike1 > Erik Funkenbusch > Tim Smith > alt > Daeron > Ghost in the Machine > Jesse Hughes > Jim Richardson > John Bailo > Liam Slider > mlw > Sinister Midget I forgot Greg Shearman, Gentoo wanker from Australia. Last I heard he was having brain seizures, the kind where he would lose time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web