Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #688729 > unrolled thread

Rightwing Bullshit Site Claims 50 Countries Already Coming to the Table on Tariffs

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  Rightwing Bullshit Site Claims 50 Countries Already Coming to the Table on Tariffs Marmalade King <x@y.com> - 2025-04-06 21:10 +0000
    Re: Rightwing Bullshit Site Claims 50 Countries Already Coming to the Table on Tariffs Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-04-06 17:13 -0400
      Re: Rightwing Bullshit Site Claims 50 Countries Already Coming to the Table on Tariffs Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-04-07 00:23 +0000
        Re: Rightwing Bullshit Site Claims 50 Countries Already Coming to the Table on Tariffs Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-04-06 20:34 -0400
          Re: Rightwing Bullshit Site Claims 50 Countries Already Coming to the Table on Tariffs Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-08 06:47 -0400
            Re: Rightwing Bullshit Site Claims 50 Countries Already Coming to the Table on Tariffs Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> - 2025-04-08 07:32 -0600
            Re: Rightwing Bullshit Site Claims 50 Countries Already Coming to the Table on Tariffs Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-04-08 20:05 +0000
              Re: Rightwing Bullshit Site Claims 50 Countries Already Coming to the Table on Tariffs Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-09 02:01 -0400

#688729 — Rightwing Bullshit Site Claims 50 Countries Already Coming to the Table on Tariffs

>https://www.breitbart.com

Consider the source.

Lapping up the right wing bullshit again.


https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/breitbart/


    Overall, we rate Breitbart Questionable based on extreme right-wing 
bias, the publication of conspiracy theories and propaganda, as well as 
numerous false claims.

Detailed Report

Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: RIGHT (8.1)
 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#688730

Marmalade King <x@y.com> wrote:

>>https://www.breitbart.com
>
>Consider the source.
>
>Lapping up the right wing bullshit again.
>
>
>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/breitbart/
>
>
>    Overall, we rate Breitbart Questionable based on extreme right-wing 
>bias, the publication of conspiracy theories and propaganda, as well as 
>numerous false claims.
>
>Detailed Report
>
>Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Failed Fact Checks
>Bias Rating: RIGHT (8.1)


You sure did your homework, heh.  Some would kind of see it as
obvious, self-evidently right-wing media misdirecting, misinforming
people.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#688734

On 2025-04-06, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> Marmalade King <x@y.com> wrote:
>
>>>https://www.breitbart.com
>>
>>Consider the source.
>>
>>Lapping up the right wing bullshit again.
>>
>>
>>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/breitbart/
>>
>>
>>    Overall, we rate Breitbart Questionable based on extreme right-wing 
>>bias, the publication of conspiracy theories and propaganda, as well as 
>>numerous false claims.
>>
>>Detailed Report
>>
>>Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Failed Fact Checks
>>Bias Rating: RIGHT (8.1)
>
>
> You sure did your homework, heh.  Some would kind of see it as
> obvious, self-evidently right-wing media misdirecting, misinforming
> people.
>

At least you think it's unintentional.
I think they are _directing_ you to their site.
If they were _misdirecting_ you, you'd be reading something else ;)

-- 
End Transmission

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#688735

Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> wrote:
>On 2025-04-06, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Marmalade King <x@y.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>https://www.breitbart.com
>>>
>>>Consider the source.
>>>
>>>Lapping up the right wing bullshit again.
>>>
>>>
>>>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/breitbart/
>>>
>>>
>>>    Overall, we rate Breitbart Questionable based on extreme right-wing 
>>>bias, the publication of conspiracy theories and propaganda, as well as 
>>>numerous false claims.
>>>
>>>Detailed Report
>>>
>>>Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Failed Fact Checks
>>>Bias Rating: RIGHT (8.1)
>>
>> You sure did your homework, heh.  Some would kind of see it as
>> obvious, self-evidently right-wing media misdirecting, misinforming
>> people.
>
>At least you think it's unintentional.
>I think they are _directing_ you to their site.
>If they were _misdirecting_ you, you'd be reading something else ;)


I don't think you understood my point.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#688752

On Sun, 06 Apr 2025 20:34:36 -0400, Joel wrote:
>Adison Vohn Caterson  wrote:
>>On 2025-04-06, Joel  wrote:
>>> Marmalade King wrote:
>>>>>https://www.breitbart.com
>>>>Consider the source.
>>>>Lapping up the right wing bullshit again.
>>>>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/breitbart/
>>>>    Overall, we rate Breitbart Questionable based on extreme right-wing 
>>>>bias, the publication of conspiracy theories and propaganda, as well as 
>>>>numerous false claims.
>>>>
>>>>Detailed Report
>>>>Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Failed Fact Checks
>>>>Bias Rating: RIGHT (8.1)

>>> You sure did your homework, heh.  Some would kind of see it as
>>> obvious, self-evidently right-wing media misdirecting, misinforming
>>> people.
>>
>>At least you think it's unintentional.

What makes you think that?

>>I think they are _directing_ you to their site.
>>If they were _misdirecting_ you, you'd be reading something else ;)
>
>
>I don't think you understood my point.

He did.  The hallmark of a hardline partisan, especially rightists, is
to deliberately misunderstand simple language and use that to spin
something completely different from what you said.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#688756

In article <pev9vjp93pcbm0paaqn27khn4cfl7uvbee@4ax.com>, 
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
> 
> On Sun, 06 Apr 2025 20:34:36 -0400, Joel wrote:
> >Adison Vohn Caterson  wrote:
> >>On 2025-04-06, Joel  wrote:
> >>> Marmalade King wrote:
> >>>>>https://www.breitbart.com
> >>>>Consider the source.
> >>>>Lapping up the right wing bullshit again.
> >>>>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/breitbart/
> >>>>    Overall, we rate Breitbart Questionable based on extreme right-wing 
> >>>>bias, the publication of conspiracy theories and propaganda, as well as 
> >>>>numerous false claims.
> >>>>
> >>>>Detailed Report
> >>>>Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Failed Fact Checks
> >>>>Bias Rating: RIGHT (8.1)
> 
> >>> You sure did your homework, heh.  Some would kind of see it as
> >>> obvious, self-evidently right-wing media misdirecting, misinforming
> >>> people.
> >>
> >>At least you think it's unintentional.
> 
> What makes you think that?
> 
> >>I think they are _directing_ you to their site.
> >>If they were _misdirecting_ you, you'd be reading something else ;)
> >
> >
> >I don't think you understood my point.
> 
> He did.  The hallmark of a hardline partisan, especially rightists, is
> to deliberately misunderstand simple language and use that to spin
> something completely different from what you said.

Like what MSM does to Trump?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#688764

On 2025-04-08, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Apr 2025 20:34:36 -0400, Joel wrote:
>>Adison Vohn Caterson  wrote:
>>>On 2025-04-06, Joel  wrote:
>>>> Marmalade King wrote:
>>>>>>https://www.breitbart.com
>>>>>Consider the source.
>>>>>Lapping up the right wing bullshit again.
>>>>>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/breitbart/
>>>>>    Overall, we rate Breitbart Questionable based on extreme right-wing 
>>>>>bias, the publication of conspiracy theories and propaganda, as well as 
>>>>>numerous false claims.
>>>>>
>>>>>Detailed Report
>>>>>Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Failed Fact Checks
>>>>>Bias Rating: RIGHT (8.1)
>
>>>> You sure did your homework, heh.  Some would kind of see it as
>>>> obvious, self-evidently right-wing media misdirecting, misinforming
>>>> people.
>>>
>>>At least you think it's unintentional.
>
> What makes you think that?

Misinformation = incorrect facts.
Disinformation = deliberate, misleading, incorrect facts.
You're welcome ;)

>
>>>I think they are _directing_ you to their site.
>>>If they were _misdirecting_ you, you'd be reading something else ;)
>>
>>
>>I don't think you understood my point.
>
> He did.  The hallmark of a hardline partisan, especially rightists, is
> to deliberately misunderstand simple language and use that to spin
> something completely different from what you said.

But I didn't *disunderstand* it.

-- 
End Transmission

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#688790

On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 20:05:31 -0000 (UTC), Adison Vohn Caterson
<Adison@Caterson.invalid> wrote:

>On 2025-04-08, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 06 Apr 2025 20:34:36 -0400, Joel wrote:
>>>Adison Vohn Caterson  wrote:
>>>>On 2025-04-06, Joel  wrote:
>>>>> Marmalade King wrote:
>>>>>>>https://www.breitbart.com
>>>>>>Consider the source.
>>>>>>Lapping up the right wing bullshit again.
>>>>>>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/breitbart/
>>>>>>    Overall, we rate Breitbart Questionable based on extreme right-wing 
>>>>>>bias, the publication of conspiracy theories and propaganda, as well as 
>>>>>>numerous false claims.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Detailed Report
>>>>>>Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Failed Fact Checks
>>>>>>Bias Rating: RIGHT (8.1)
>>
>>>>> You sure did your homework, heh.  Some would kind of see it as
>>>>> obvious, self-evidently right-wing media misdirecting, misinforming
>>>>> people.
>>>>
>>>>At least you think it's unintentional.
>>
>> What makes you think that?
>
>Misinformation = incorrect facts.
>Disinformation = deliberate, misleading, incorrect facts.
>You're welcome ;)
>
>>
>>>>I think they are _directing_ you to their site.
>>>>If they were _misdirecting_ you, you'd be reading something else ;)
>>>
>>>
>>>I don't think you understood my point.
>>
>> He did.  The hallmark of a hardline partisan, especially rightists, is
>> to deliberately misunderstand simple language and use that to spin
>> something completely different from what you said.
>
>But I didn't *disunderstand* it.

Bingo!

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web