Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #689406 > unrolled thread
| Started by | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-04-23 09:11 -0400 |
| Last post | 2025-04-25 01:27 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 258 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-23 09:11 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-24 12:43 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-24 09:07 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-25 01:25 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-25 05:12 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-26 02:53 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-04-25 19:27 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-25 15:38 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-26 00:42 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-24 13:31 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-24 09:47 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-25 01:28 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-25 12:06 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-25 23:16 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-26 00:50 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-26 01:21 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-26 03:03 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-26 07:34 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-26 08:04 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-26 03:00 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-26 10:09 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-04-26 05:53 -0500
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-26 11:02 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-26 23:00 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-27 07:24 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-27 08:50 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-28 12:41 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-29 02:50 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-29 13:52 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-27 06:35 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-27 07:18 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-04-27 08:45 -0500
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-28 11:44 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-04-28 17:05 -0500
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-04-28 17:11 -0500
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-29 02:51 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-29 09:02 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-29 14:08 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-29 11:07 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-30 10:24 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-30 09:13 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-01 14:15 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-01 14:42 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-02 15:03 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-02 20:33 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-05-03 08:18 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-03 21:34 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-01 18:43 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-02 00:17 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-01 21:47 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-02 07:43 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-02 09:13 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-02 20:16 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-05-02 20:47 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-02 19:31 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-03 00:13 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-02 22:16 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-03 10:50 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-03 09:31 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-04 09:51 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-04 08:23 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-04 13:38 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-04 18:00 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-05 11:03 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-05 08:40 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-05-04 14:40 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-05-04 11:52 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-04 20:05 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-05 04:50 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-05-05 18:50 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-05-05 14:55 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-03 04:29 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-02 15:20 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-02 11:28 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-03 00:11 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-02 20:15 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-03 01:02 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-02 22:24 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-03 10:56 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-05-03 08:29 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-03 10:39 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-04 10:04 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-04 08:24 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-04 20:10 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-05 04:48 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-05 08:36 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-05 17:06 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-05 14:04 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-05 18:59 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-05 15:24 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-06 02:21 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-06 11:00 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-06 20:58 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-06 19:43 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-08 00:29 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-08 03:28 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-08 10:02 -0400
Linux again (was: Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-05-07 04:18 +0000
Re: Linux again (was: Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-05-07 00:56 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-06 07:13 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-06 08:04 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-06 20:43 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-06 06:54 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-05-07 17:30 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-05-08 07:06 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-06 06:53 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-06 06:42 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-06 11:02 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-03 19:36 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-03 04:02 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-03 08:16 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-03 21:23 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-03 19:45 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-04 02:06 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-04 07:37 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-30 18:17 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-01 14:03 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-01 13:52 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-29 22:49 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-26 22:57 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-27 07:33 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-27 08:51 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-28 12:02 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-29 02:47 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-04-27 09:12 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-28 01:15 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-28 11:51 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-04-28 08:37 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-29 02:48 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-04-27 08:49 -0500
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-28 11:45 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-27 06:33 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-27 07:31 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-27 08:53 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-04-27 08:51 -0500
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-28 07:33 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-28 08:45 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-04-28 17:42 -0500
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-28 18:51 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-29 02:26 +0000
Re: Evolution (was Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-29 02:54 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-28 12:33 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-29 02:56 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-29 13:59 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-06-10 01:06 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-28 07:27 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-28 12:14 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-29 02:53 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-29 14:01 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-06-10 01:05 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-26 08:15 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-26 23:03 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-27 06:46 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-27 07:41 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-27 14:30 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-28 02:51 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-28 08:33 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-27 06:45 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-27 08:15 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-28 07:35 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-27 14:41 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-28 07:42 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-28 11:40 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-28 12:25 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-28 08:49 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-28 18:03 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-28 20:01 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-28 16:47 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-29 06:15 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-29 09:23 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-29 14:21 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-29 11:24 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-29 21:11 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-29 17:33 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-29 22:14 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-29 19:37 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-30 00:25 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-04-30 00:30 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-29 18:22 -0700
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-04-30 01:39 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-30 08:53 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-01 13:54 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-01 13:28 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-02 00:09 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-01 21:45 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-02 15:31 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-02 11:41 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-30 10:15 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-30 09:07 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-29 21:03 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-02 22:56 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-02 19:48 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-30 10:13 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-02 22:51 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-03 03:49 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-02 22:49 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-02 19:45 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-03 05:27 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-03 08:18 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-04 06:58 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-04 08:14 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-05 04:41 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-30 10:11 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-04-29 15:26 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-29 08:56 -0700
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-04-29 16:10 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-29 09:48 -0700
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-30 10:10 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-30 09:05 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-01 14:24 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-05-01 17:04 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-05-01 11:01 -0700
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-01 19:18 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-01 23:30 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-02 16:01 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-01 18:47 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-02 23:26 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-03 01:09 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-03 03:56 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-03 05:42 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-03 10:45 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-04 07:02 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-04 08:39 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-05 04:44 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-05 06:24 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-30 18:20 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-01 14:01 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-02 23:15 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-02 19:55 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-03 05:32 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-03 08:23 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-03 01:06 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-03 05:36 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-03 04:14 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-29 13:26 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-28 08:48 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-28 19:58 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-28 16:46 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-29 06:11 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-29 13:38 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-04-29 00:11 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-28 17:20 -0700
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-04-29 01:27 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-29 02:52 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-29 13:29 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-27 08:13 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-26 02:57 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-04-24 18:54 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-04-24 20:35 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-24 14:04 -0700
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-24 17:26 -0400
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-04-24 21:45 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-04-24 21:48 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-24 14:57 -0700
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-24 21:53 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-24 14:58 -0700
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-25 01:29 +0000
Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-04-25 01:27 +0000
Page 10 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 Next page →
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-30 08:53 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <X2pQP.3067392$TBhc.2625105@fx16.iad> |
| In reply to | #689727 |
On 2025-04-29 21:22, % wrote: > vallor wrote: >> On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:25:31 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro >> <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in <vurqlr$2utdn$2@dont-email.me>: >> >>> On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:37:14 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >>> >>>> "But just to be extra clear: Fuck Nazis, GNOME is Antifa." >>> >>> Who could possibly object to that? >>> >>> Except perhaps closet Nazis ... >> >> Unfortunately, they are all over the Usenet. >> >> (And some not-so-closet Nazis...) >> > i'm glad you support them Just when I was considering unblocking him. In his opinion, anyone who is or supports conservatives is a Nazi, even though Hitler himself was nowhere near conservative and neither was his party. He'll have to entertain himself with the effeminate posts by Joel and Chris Ahlstrom because I doubt that anyone else is excited by how he updated his kernel. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-01 13:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrn1016v8c.2qk.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> |
| In reply to | #689741 |
On 2025-04-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > On 2025-04-29 21:22, % wrote: >> vallor wrote: >>> On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:25:31 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro >>> <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in <vurqlr$2utdn$2@dont-email.me>: >>> >>>> On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:37:14 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>> >>>>> "But just to be extra clear: Fuck Nazis, GNOME is Antifa." >>>> >>>> Who could possibly object to that? >>>> >>>> Except perhaps closet Nazis ... >>> >>> Unfortunately, they are all over the Usenet. >>> >>> (And some not-so-closet Nazis...) >>> >> i'm glad you support them > > Just when I was considering unblocking him. In his opinion, anyone who > is or supports conservatives is a Nazi, even though Hitler himself was > nowhere near conservative and neither was his party. > > He'll have to entertain himself with the effeminate posts by Joel and > Chris Ahlstrom because I doubt that anyone else is excited by how he > updated his kernel. > I don't think they really believe that. Its a useful rhetorical device when you want to wield power. In the past, people would change tracks and try to disprove this spurious allegations, which gave them moral and political leverage. This is why so many organisations have let them in, just a little, to stop the accusations. Its not a statement of fact, or genuine, its to illicit fear and put you on the backfoot. Companies will spend $$$$ to not have people like him accuse them of being uninclusive or whatever.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-01 13:28 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <jbOQP.3$TI75.2@fx47.iad> |
| In reply to | #689795 |
On 2025-05-01 09:54, Borax Man wrote: > On 2025-04-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >> On 2025-04-29 21:22, % wrote: >>> vallor wrote: >>>> On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:25:31 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro >>>> <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in <vurqlr$2utdn$2@dont-email.me>: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:37:14 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> "But just to be extra clear: Fuck Nazis, GNOME is Antifa." >>>>> >>>>> Who could possibly object to that? >>>>> >>>>> Except perhaps closet Nazis ... >>>> >>>> Unfortunately, they are all over the Usenet. >>>> >>>> (And some not-so-closet Nazis...) >>>> >>> i'm glad you support them >> >> Just when I was considering unblocking him. In his opinion, anyone who >> is or supports conservatives is a Nazi, even though Hitler himself was >> nowhere near conservative and neither was his party. >> >> He'll have to entertain himself with the effeminate posts by Joel and >> Chris Ahlstrom because I doubt that anyone else is excited by how he >> updated his kernel. >> > > I don't think they really believe that. Its a useful rhetorical device > when you want to wield power. In the past, people would change tracks > and try to disprove this spurious allegations, which gave them moral and > political leverage. This is why so many organisations have let them in, > just a little, to stop the accusations. Its not a statement of fact, or > genuine, its to illicit fear and put you on the backfoot. Companies > will spend $$$$ to not have people like him accuse them of being > uninclusive or whatever. Being inclusive is the dumbest strategy I've ever seen. The public school I'm at has no choice but to be inclusive and accept all of what the people living here have to offer. The result is that the school is ranked near the bottom of the list for academic excellence. There's a reason private schools outperform the public ones all the time: excluding obvious garbage is a winning strategy. How to know what's garbage? Give potential students a test. But you can't do that, can you? You see, providing a test written black on white on a paper without even looking at what the student looks like is "racist" because blacks and brown-skinned people don't succeed as well. It's not the person's fault. No, no, the test is racist! -- God be with you, CrudeSausage KDE & LibreOffice supporter John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-02 00:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m7igp1Fdhc7U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #689807 |
On Thu, 1 May 2025 13:28:47 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > But you can't do that, can you? You see, providing a test written black > on white on a paper without even looking at what the student looks like > is "racist" because blacks and brown-skinned people don't succeed as > well. It's not the person's fault. No, no, the test is racist! https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/black-intelligence- test-cultural-homogeneity-and-wechsler-adult https://gwern.net/doc/iq/1977-matarazzo.pdf The second link is a closer examination of the BITCH. The test succeeds in showing blacks speak ghetto better than whites. However there wasn't enough spread in the black scores to tell the smart ones from the mediocre.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-01 21:45 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <8tVQP.28968$quzb.15082@fx11.iad> |
| In reply to | #689829 |
On 2025-05-01 20:09, rbowman wrote: > On Thu, 1 May 2025 13:28:47 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > >> But you can't do that, can you? You see, providing a test written black >> on white on a paper without even looking at what the student looks like >> is "racist" because blacks and brown-skinned people don't succeed as >> well. It's not the person's fault. No, no, the test is racist! > > https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/black-intelligence- > test-cultural-homogeneity-and-wechsler-adult > > https://gwern.net/doc/iq/1977-matarazzo.pdf > > The second link is a closer examination of the BITCH. The test succeeds in > showing blacks speak ghetto better than whites. However there wasn't > enough spread in the black scores to tell the smart ones from the > mediocre. It should be a badge of honour that whites can't speak ghetto. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage KDE & LibreOffice supporter John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-02 15:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrn1019pag.2rt.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> |
| In reply to | #689807 |
On 2025-05-01, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > On 2025-05-01 09:54, Borax Man wrote: >> On 2025-04-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>> On 2025-04-29 21:22, % wrote: >>>> vallor wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:25:31 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro >>>>> <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in <vurqlr$2utdn$2@dont-email.me>: >>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:37:14 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> "But just to be extra clear: Fuck Nazis, GNOME is Antifa." >>>>>> >>>>>> Who could possibly object to that? >>>>>> >>>>>> Except perhaps closet Nazis ... >>>>> >>>>> Unfortunately, they are all over the Usenet. >>>>> >>>>> (And some not-so-closet Nazis...) >>>>> >>>> i'm glad you support them >>> >>> Just when I was considering unblocking him. In his opinion, anyone who >>> is or supports conservatives is a Nazi, even though Hitler himself was >>> nowhere near conservative and neither was his party. >>> >>> He'll have to entertain himself with the effeminate posts by Joel and >>> Chris Ahlstrom because I doubt that anyone else is excited by how he >>> updated his kernel. >>> >> >> I don't think they really believe that. Its a useful rhetorical device >> when you want to wield power. In the past, people would change tracks >> and try to disprove this spurious allegations, which gave them moral and >> political leverage. This is why so many organisations have let them in, >> just a little, to stop the accusations. Its not a statement of fact, or >> genuine, its to illicit fear and put you on the backfoot. Companies >> will spend $$$$ to not have people like him accuse them of being >> uninclusive or whatever. > > Being inclusive is the dumbest strategy I've ever seen. The public > school I'm at has no choice but to be inclusive and accept all of what > the people living here have to offer. The result is that the school is > ranked near the bottom of the list for academic excellence. There's a > reason private schools outperform the public ones all the time: > excluding obvious garbage is a winning strategy. How to know what's > garbage? Give potential students a test. > > But you can't do that, can you? You see, providing a test written black > on white on a paper without even looking at what the student looks like > is "racist" because blacks and brown-skinned people don't succeed as > well. It's not the person's fault. No, no, the test is racist! > It's a big beat up really. Just treat people with the respect they deserve (not I didn't say just treat people with respect). Some people try to find problems, and when you deliberately go rooting for problems, you'll find them. So everyone tries hard to avoid being accused. It's a racket. If you can convince everyone that systemic racism is everywhere, you can charge $$$$$ to "fix" the problem with your workshops and speeches. The fact is, scared people are throwing money at them, scared devs are allowing them into software projects to "fix" them. Scared companies are putting their programs in place for fear of being sued, or having bad press. This is why in Australia, and I'm sure in the US, the casting for television commercials seems to be done very carefully to avoid any potential accusations of not being inclusive. Few believe in this stuff, they're just trying to avoid being called bad names. It leads people to make bad, bad mistakes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-02 11:41 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <iI5RP.13336$rUp4.9718@fx45.iad> |
| In reply to | #689863 |
On 2025-05-02 11:31, Borax Man wrote: > On 2025-05-01, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >> On 2025-05-01 09:54, Borax Man wrote: >>> On 2025-04-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>> On 2025-04-29 21:22, % wrote: >>>>> vallor wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:25:31 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro >>>>>> <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in <vurqlr$2utdn$2@dont-email.me>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:37:14 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "But just to be extra clear: Fuck Nazis, GNOME is Antifa." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Who could possibly object to that? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Except perhaps closet Nazis ... >>>>>> >>>>>> Unfortunately, they are all over the Usenet. >>>>>> >>>>>> (And some not-so-closet Nazis...) >>>>>> >>>>> i'm glad you support them >>>> >>>> Just when I was considering unblocking him. In his opinion, anyone who >>>> is or supports conservatives is a Nazi, even though Hitler himself was >>>> nowhere near conservative and neither was his party. >>>> >>>> He'll have to entertain himself with the effeminate posts by Joel and >>>> Chris Ahlstrom because I doubt that anyone else is excited by how he >>>> updated his kernel. >>>> >>> >>> I don't think they really believe that. Its a useful rhetorical device >>> when you want to wield power. In the past, people would change tracks >>> and try to disprove this spurious allegations, which gave them moral and >>> political leverage. This is why so many organisations have let them in, >>> just a little, to stop the accusations. Its not a statement of fact, or >>> genuine, its to illicit fear and put you on the backfoot. Companies >>> will spend $$$$ to not have people like him accuse them of being >>> uninclusive or whatever. >> >> Being inclusive is the dumbest strategy I've ever seen. The public >> school I'm at has no choice but to be inclusive and accept all of what >> the people living here have to offer. The result is that the school is >> ranked near the bottom of the list for academic excellence. There's a >> reason private schools outperform the public ones all the time: >> excluding obvious garbage is a winning strategy. How to know what's >> garbage? Give potential students a test. >> >> But you can't do that, can you? You see, providing a test written black >> on white on a paper without even looking at what the student looks like >> is "racist" because blacks and brown-skinned people don't succeed as >> well. It's not the person's fault. No, no, the test is racist! >> > > It's a big beat up really. Just treat people with the respect they > deserve (not I didn't say just treat people with respect). Some people > try to find problems, and when you deliberately go rooting for problems, > you'll find them. So everyone tries hard to avoid being accused. It's a > racket. If you can convince everyone that systemic racism is > everywhere, you can charge $$$$$ to "fix" the problem with your > workshops and speeches. The fact is, scared people are throwing money > at them, scared devs are allowing them into software projects to "fix" > them. Scared companies are putting their programs in place for fear of > being sued, or having bad press. > > This is why in Australia, and I'm sure in the US, the casting for > television commercials seems to be done very carefully to avoid any > potential accusations of not being inclusive. Few believe in this > stuff, they're just trying to avoid being called bad names. It leads > people to make bad, bad mistakes. Every commercial today has a white woman with a black guy or a frail-looking white guy with an unbelievably ugly black woman. This is what they want from us: for our beautiful women to procreate with brain-dead black guys and us white guys to procreate with whatever's left, which just happens to be women nobody in their right mind would want even if they weren't repulsive. It's "inclusive" to the politically correct but in reality, it's a poorly disguised plan to eradicate the white race. Even at my worst, I wouldn't have agreed to procreate with a baboon that looks like vallor with black skin. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage KDE & LibreOffice supporter John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-30 10:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrn1013u14.1aev.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> |
| In reply to | #689722 |
On 2025-04-30, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: > On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:25:31 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro ><ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in <vurqlr$2utdn$2@dont-email.me>: > >> On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:37:14 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >> >>> "But just to be extra clear: Fuck Nazis, GNOME is Antifa." >> >> Who could possibly object to that? >> >> Except perhaps closet Nazis ... > > Unfortunately, they are all over the Usenet. > > (And some not-so-closet Nazis...) > Nazis. Sure man. They're everywhere. The place if full Nazis. Nazis everywhere. What comical paranoia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-30 09:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ogpQP.1850130$BrX.1394984@fx12.iad> |
| In reply to | #689738 |
On 2025-04-30 06:15, Borax Man wrote: > On 2025-04-30, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >> On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:25:31 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro >> <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in <vurqlr$2utdn$2@dont-email.me>: >> >>> On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:37:14 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >>> >>>> "But just to be extra clear: Fuck Nazis, GNOME is Antifa." >>> >>> Who could possibly object to that? >>> >>> Except perhaps closet Nazis ... >> >> Unfortunately, they are all over the Usenet. >> >> (And some not-so-closet Nazis...) >> > > Nazis. Sure man. They're everywhere. The place if full Nazis. Nazis everywhere. > > What comical paranoia. It is seriously pathetic to watch. Imagine your life having so little meaning and having so little courage that you believe doxxing people is a heroic act as is punching grandma on the street. I look forward to the day that these clowns are themselves outed and hanged on the streets for the damage they've done to their communities. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage KDE & LibreOffice supporter John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-29 21:03 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <YFeQP.760864$D41.186562@fx45.iad> |
| In reply to | #689721 |
On 2025-04-29 20:25, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:37:14 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > >> "But just to be extra clear: Fuck Nazis, GNOME is Antifa." > > Who could possibly object to that? > > Except perhaps closet Nazis ... I don't care about the first part since idiots tend to think that everyone who disagrees with them on anything is a Nazi. It's the second part I can't stomach. If they're Antfia, I won't be using their software and I definitely won't ever donate to them. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage LibreOffice supporter John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-02 22:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrn101ajdu.2sik.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home> |
| In reply to | #689725 |
On 2025-04-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > On 2025-04-29 20:25, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >> On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:37:14 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >> >>> "But just to be extra clear: Fuck Nazis, GNOME is Antifa." >> >> Who could possibly object to that? >> >> Except perhaps closet Nazis ... > > I don't care about the first part since idiots tend to think that > everyone who disagrees with them on anything is a Nazi. It's the second > part I can't stomach. If they're Antfia, I won't be using their software > and I definitely won't ever donate to them. The "Gnome is Antifa" claim is one that Tobias Bernard is making in his personal blog and HE'S the one who is mad at the Gnome Foundation for some reason. So, apparently, Gnome is not doing what he wants them to do. This indicates that not everyone at Gnome is an unhinged, Woke moron. -- Jesus sat with sinners: He didn't sin with them. Know the difference.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-02 19:48 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <tRcRP.27552$0jW7.3521@fx09.iad> |
| In reply to | #689881 |
On 2025-05-02 18:56, RonB wrote: > On 2025-04-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >> On 2025-04-29 20:25, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >>> On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:37:14 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >>> >>>> "But just to be extra clear: Fuck Nazis, GNOME is Antifa." >>> >>> Who could possibly object to that? >>> >>> Except perhaps closet Nazis ... >> >> I don't care about the first part since idiots tend to think that >> everyone who disagrees with them on anything is a Nazi. It's the second >> part I can't stomach. If they're Antfia, I won't be using their software >> and I definitely won't ever donate to them. > > The "Gnome is Antifa" claim is one that Tobias Bernard is making in his > personal blog and HE'S the one who is mad at the Gnome Foundation for some > reason. So, apparently, Gnome is not doing what he wants them to do. This > indicates that not everyone at Gnome is an unhinged, Woke moron. I hope they aren't, because I doubt that the left-leaning people donate as much to open-source project as right-leaning people do. In fact, historical data usually proves that we're a lot more generous. It might have something to do with their beliefs not coinciding with the desire to freeload. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage KDE & LibreOffice supporter John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-30 10:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrn1013ttj.1aev.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> |
| In reply to | #689721 |
On 2025-04-30, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: > On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:37:14 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > >> "But just to be extra clear: Fuck Nazis, GNOME is Antifa." > > Who could possibly object to that? > > Except perhaps closet Nazis ... Or people who object to political violence and intimidation and thuggery. Good to know you support this group, you've outed yourself.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-02 22:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrn101aj33.2sik.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home> |
| In reply to | #689721 |
On 2025-04-30, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: > On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:37:14 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > >> "But just to be extra clear: Fuck Nazis, GNOME is Antifa." > > Who could possibly object to that? > > Except perhaps closet Nazis ... You think the violent asswipes at Antifa are to be admired? -- Jesus sat with sinners: He didn't sin with them. Know the difference.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-03 03:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m7li1qFsk04U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #689879 |
On Fri, 2 May 2025 22:51:12 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote: > On 2025-04-30, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: >> On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:37:14 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >> >>> "But just to be extra clear: Fuck Nazis, GNOME is Antifa." >> >> Who could possibly object to that? >> >> Except perhaps closet Nazis ... > > You think the violent asswipes at Antifa are to be admired? https://www.anesi.com/east/horstw.htm The SA arose in part as protection against the Roter Frontkämpferbund branch of the KPD. (Communist Party of Germany) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roter_Frontk%C3%A4mpferbund#Activities The Rotfront was eventually replaced with the original Antifa. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antifaschistische_Aktion We aren't there yet but if Antifa wants to FAFO...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-02 22:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrn101aj0n.2sik.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home> |
| In reply to | #689716 |
On 2025-04-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > On 2025-04-29 18:14, RonB wrote: >> On 2025-04-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>> On 2025-04-29 17:11, RonB wrote: >>>> On 2025-04-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>> On 2025-04-29 10:21, Borax Man wrote: >>>>>> On 2025-04-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2025-04-29 02:15, RonB wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2025-04-28, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2025-04-28 16:01, RonB wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2025-04-28, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:49:54 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'll admit that I didn't notice all of what installing Snaps did to my >>>>>>>>>>>> machine, but I could definitely tell that it was a mess. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You don't want to run 'df -a'. I'm up to /dev/loop62 for snap stuff. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It took me a while to root all that snap crap out of my system, but I think >>>>>>>>>> I've got it all cleared now. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There is a script you can use to automatically rid your system of it. A >>>>>>>>> quick search on your engine of choice will find it for you. Heck, it >>>>>>>>> comes up at the top of the results in Brave Search. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If I get more involved with Ubuntu I'll look it up. I was just happy to be >>>>>>>> wrong about some of my Ubuntu and Wayland assumptions. Ubuntu is not going >>>>>>>> to become my "go to" Linux distribution. It was more in the line of... "even >>>>>>>> the Linux 'flavor' I don't particularly like is pretty good." (I'm still not >>>>>>>> a fan of Gnome 3.) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I wasn't a fan, but I was happy to use it because I'm a fan of Ubuntu's >>>>>>> interface. However, I won't bother with it if the contributors are proud >>>>>>> members of Antifa. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> They are? Thats a concern if true. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm not sure why Antifa are not labelled as a terrorist organisation, >>>>>> they fit the definition. >>>>> >>>>> A contributor proudly announced that Gnome is Antifa on blogs.gnome.org. >>>> >>>> So is Lunduke basing his Antifa/Ubuntu connection theory on this one >>>> contributor? >>>> >>>> It should be mentioned that the word "ubuntu" had a "philosophical" (almost >>>> religious) meaning before it was used as the name for a Linux distribution. >>>> The fact that Canonical choose this name probably indicates their belief >>>> bias, but I haven't seen any evidence of an official Ubuntu/Antifa >>>> connection. >>>> >>>> If I'm wrong, point me to the link or documentation. >>> >>> The connection is between Antifa and Gnome, not Ubuntu. However, this is >>> pretty consistent with some of the things that have been reported in the >>> past about Gnome and its woke policies. If he provides a direct link to >>> the post eventually, I'll copy it here. >> >> Okay. Thanks. > > I found it through a routine search in Brave: ><https://blogs.gnome.org/tbernard/2025/04/23/the-elephant-in-the-room/> > > Here is the paragraph: > > "One important thing to note is that nobody involved is against Codes of > Conduct. The problem here is the Foundation’s structural dysfunction, > bad leadership, and the way the CoC was used in this case as a result. > I’m aware of the charged nature of the subject, and the potential for > feeding right wing narratives, but I think it’s also important to not > let that deter us from discussing these very real issues. But just to be > extra clear: Fuck Nazis, GNOME is Antifa." But this is not Gnome officially speaking. It's someone associated with Gnome whining because Gnome got rid of someone that he apparently respected. They guy who is attacking the Gnome Foundation is the one who wrote "Fuck Nazis, GNOME is Antifa." And this blog is, apparently, so "influential" that there has been a total of seven responses to this post. And the responses from other Gnome people have not all been supportive. Was it really necessary to call right wing people nazis? does this kind of talk benefit anyone? And... You lost me when you said “Fuck Nazis. GNOME is Antifa”. Tell me in what way Antifa is any different to the Nazi Brownshirts in 1930’s Germany? I think it would be more accurate to say: “Fuck Nazis. Antifa is Nazi”. I don't what the issue is here, or who Sonny is or why he was (apparently) banned from Gnome, but this blogger (who, notice, is opposing Gnome here) is the one who called Gnome Antifa. So, again, Lunduke is click baiting and taking a quote out of context. This guy proves again that truth is not that important to him. -- Jesus sat with sinners: He didn't sin with them. Know the difference.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-02 19:45 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nOcRP.27245$0jW7.22367@fx09.iad> |
| In reply to | #689878 |
On 2025-05-02 18:49, RonB wrote: > On 2025-04-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >> On 2025-04-29 18:14, RonB wrote: >>> On 2025-04-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>> On 2025-04-29 17:11, RonB wrote: >>>>> On 2025-04-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>> On 2025-04-29 10:21, Borax Man wrote: >>>>>>> On 2025-04-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2025-04-29 02:15, RonB wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2025-04-28, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2025-04-28 16:01, RonB wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-04-28, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:49:54 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll admit that I didn't notice all of what installing Snaps did to my >>>>>>>>>>>>> machine, but I could definitely tell that it was a mess. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You don't want to run 'df -a'. I'm up to /dev/loop62 for snap stuff. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It took me a while to root all that snap crap out of my system, but I think >>>>>>>>>>> I've got it all cleared now. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> There is a script you can use to automatically rid your system of it. A >>>>>>>>>> quick search on your engine of choice will find it for you. Heck, it >>>>>>>>>> comes up at the top of the results in Brave Search. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If I get more involved with Ubuntu I'll look it up. I was just happy to be >>>>>>>>> wrong about some of my Ubuntu and Wayland assumptions. Ubuntu is not going >>>>>>>>> to become my "go to" Linux distribution. It was more in the line of... "even >>>>>>>>> the Linux 'flavor' I don't particularly like is pretty good." (I'm still not >>>>>>>>> a fan of Gnome 3.) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I wasn't a fan, but I was happy to use it because I'm a fan of Ubuntu's >>>>>>>> interface. However, I won't bother with it if the contributors are proud >>>>>>>> members of Antifa. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They are? Thats a concern if true. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm not sure why Antifa are not labelled as a terrorist organisation, >>>>>>> they fit the definition. >>>>>> >>>>>> A contributor proudly announced that Gnome is Antifa on blogs.gnome.org. >>>>> >>>>> So is Lunduke basing his Antifa/Ubuntu connection theory on this one >>>>> contributor? >>>>> >>>>> It should be mentioned that the word "ubuntu" had a "philosophical" (almost >>>>> religious) meaning before it was used as the name for a Linux distribution. >>>>> The fact that Canonical choose this name probably indicates their belief >>>>> bias, but I haven't seen any evidence of an official Ubuntu/Antifa >>>>> connection. >>>>> >>>>> If I'm wrong, point me to the link or documentation. >>>> >>>> The connection is between Antifa and Gnome, not Ubuntu. However, this is >>>> pretty consistent with some of the things that have been reported in the >>>> past about Gnome and its woke policies. If he provides a direct link to >>>> the post eventually, I'll copy it here. >>> >>> Okay. Thanks. >> >> I found it through a routine search in Brave: >> <https://blogs.gnome.org/tbernard/2025/04/23/the-elephant-in-the-room/> >> >> Here is the paragraph: >> >> "One important thing to note is that nobody involved is against Codes of >> Conduct. The problem here is the Foundation’s structural dysfunction, >> bad leadership, and the way the CoC was used in this case as a result. >> I’m aware of the charged nature of the subject, and the potential for >> feeding right wing narratives, but I think it’s also important to not >> let that deter us from discussing these very real issues. But just to be >> extra clear: Fuck Nazis, GNOME is Antifa." > > But this is not Gnome officially speaking. It's someone associated with > Gnome whining because Gnome got rid of someone that he apparently respected. > They guy who is attacking the Gnome Foundation is the one who wrote "Fuck > Nazis, GNOME is Antifa." > > And this blog is, apparently, so "influential" that there has been a total > of seven responses to this post. And the responses from other Gnome people > have not all been supportive. > > Was it really necessary to call right wing people nazis? does this kind > of talk benefit anyone? > > And... > > You lost me when you said “Fuck Nazis. GNOME is Antifa”. Tell me in what > way Antifa is any different to the Nazi Brownshirts in 1930’s Germany? I > think it would be more accurate to say: > > “Fuck Nazis. Antifa is Nazi”. > > I don't what the issue is here, or who Sonny is or why he was (apparently) > banned from Gnome, but this blogger (who, notice, is opposing Gnome here) is > the one who called Gnome Antifa. So, again, Lunduke is click baiting and > taking a quote out of context. This guy proves again that truth is not that > important to him. Like I said, it's not the first time that GNOME has been associated with leftist politics. This is just the latest edition. At this point, I'm glad to stay away from them. Besides, I actually prefer KDE. As of yet, I haven't yet of KDE having any kind of brain-dead Marxists pushing their garbage on the project. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage KDE & LibreOffice supporter John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-03 05:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrn101baac.7uk4.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home> |
| In reply to | #689887 |
On 2025-05-02, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > On 2025-05-02 18:49, RonB wrote: <snips> >> >> But this is not Gnome officially speaking. It's someone associated with >> Gnome whining because Gnome got rid of someone that he apparently respected. >> They guy who is attacking the Gnome Foundation is the one who wrote "Fuck >> Nazis, GNOME is Antifa." >> >> And this blog is, apparently, so "influential" that there has been a total >> of seven responses to this post. And the responses from other Gnome people >> have not all been supportive. >> >> Was it really necessary to call right wing people nazis? does this kind >> of talk benefit anyone? >> >> And... >> >> You lost me when you said “Fuck Nazis. GNOME is Antifa”. Tell me in what >> way Antifa is any different to the Nazi Brownshirts in 1930’s Germany? I >> think it would be more accurate to say: >> >> “Fuck Nazis. Antifa is Nazi”. >> >> I don't what the issue is here, or who Sonny is or why he was (apparently) >> banned from Gnome, but this blogger (who, notice, is opposing Gnome here) is >> the one who called Gnome Antifa. So, again, Lunduke is click baiting and >> taking a quote out of context. This guy proves again that truth is not that >> important to him. > > Like I said, it's not the first time that GNOME has been associated with > leftist politics. This is just the latest edition. At this point, I'm > glad to stay away from them. Besides, I actually prefer KDE. > > As of yet, I haven't yet of KDE having any kind of brain-dead Marxists > pushing their garbage on the project. I don't doubt that Gnome can be linked to leftist politics, but that's a far cry from insinuating "Gnome is Antifa" as if the Gnome Foundation is officially endorsing these violent Antifa morons. This appears to be just more Lunduke lying by omission in order to create click bait. I don't like dishonest bullshit like this. -- Jesus sat with sinners: He didn't sin with them. Know the difference.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-03 08:18 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <SQnRP.15306$f6Vd.7784@fx11.iad> |
| In reply to | #689909 |
On 2025-05-03 01:27, RonB wrote: > On 2025-05-02, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >> On 2025-05-02 18:49, RonB wrote: > <snips> >>> >>> But this is not Gnome officially speaking. It's someone associated with >>> Gnome whining because Gnome got rid of someone that he apparently respected. >>> They guy who is attacking the Gnome Foundation is the one who wrote "Fuck >>> Nazis, GNOME is Antifa." >>> >>> And this blog is, apparently, so "influential" that there has been a total >>> of seven responses to this post. And the responses from other Gnome people >>> have not all been supportive. >>> >>> Was it really necessary to call right wing people nazis? does this kind >>> of talk benefit anyone? >>> >>> And... >>> >>> You lost me when you said “Fuck Nazis. GNOME is Antifa”. Tell me in what >>> way Antifa is any different to the Nazi Brownshirts in 1930’s Germany? I >>> think it would be more accurate to say: >>> >>> “Fuck Nazis. Antifa is Nazi”. >>> >>> I don't what the issue is here, or who Sonny is or why he was (apparently) >>> banned from Gnome, but this blogger (who, notice, is opposing Gnome here) is >>> the one who called Gnome Antifa. So, again, Lunduke is click baiting and >>> taking a quote out of context. This guy proves again that truth is not that >>> important to him. >> >> Like I said, it's not the first time that GNOME has been associated with >> leftist politics. This is just the latest edition. At this point, I'm >> glad to stay away from them. Besides, I actually prefer KDE. >> >> As of yet, I haven't yet of KDE having any kind of brain-dead Marxists >> pushing their garbage on the project. > > I don't doubt that Gnome can be linked to leftist politics, but that's a far > cry from insinuating "Gnome is Antifa" as if the Gnome Foundation is > officially endorsing these violent Antifa morons. > > This appears to be just more Lunduke lying by omission in order to create > click bait. I don't like dishonest bullshit like this. Well, it's not really clickbait in my case since I already have a lifetime subscription to his content. At this point, he doesn't make any more money from me. Either way, I'm happy that he's pointing out what's going on in the circles we don't automatically venture to. Without him pointing it out, I wouldn't have any idea how leftist Mozilla or GNOME are, and I wouldn't be aware of how much spying Firefox does by default. I don't see any real reason to dislike him. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage KDE & LibreOffice supporter John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-04 06:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrn101e40c.9g5m.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home> |
| In reply to | #689922 |
On 2025-05-03, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > On 2025-05-03 01:27, RonB wrote: >> On 2025-05-02, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>> On 2025-05-02 18:49, RonB wrote: >> <snips> >>>> >>>> But this is not Gnome officially speaking. It's someone associated with >>>> Gnome whining because Gnome got rid of someone that he apparently respected. >>>> They guy who is attacking the Gnome Foundation is the one who wrote "Fuck >>>> Nazis, GNOME is Antifa." >>>> >>>> And this blog is, apparently, so "influential" that there has been a total >>>> of seven responses to this post. And the responses from other Gnome people >>>> have not all been supportive. >>>> >>>> Was it really necessary to call right wing people nazis? does this kind >>>> of talk benefit anyone? >>>> >>>> And... >>>> >>>> You lost me when you said “Fuck Nazis. GNOME is Antifa”. Tell me in what >>>> way Antifa is any different to the Nazi Brownshirts in 1930’s Germany? I >>>> think it would be more accurate to say: >>>> >>>> “Fuck Nazis. Antifa is Nazi”. >>>> >>>> I don't what the issue is here, or who Sonny is or why he was (apparently) >>>> banned from Gnome, but this blogger (who, notice, is opposing Gnome here) is >>>> the one who called Gnome Antifa. So, again, Lunduke is click baiting and >>>> taking a quote out of context. This guy proves again that truth is not that >>>> important to him. >>> >>> Like I said, it's not the first time that GNOME has been associated with >>> leftist politics. This is just the latest edition. At this point, I'm >>> glad to stay away from them. Besides, I actually prefer KDE. >>> >>> As of yet, I haven't yet of KDE having any kind of brain-dead Marxists >>> pushing their garbage on the project. >> >> I don't doubt that Gnome can be linked to leftist politics, but that's a far >> cry from insinuating "Gnome is Antifa" as if the Gnome Foundation is >> officially endorsing these violent Antifa morons. >> >> This appears to be just more Lunduke lying by omission in order to create >> click bait. I don't like dishonest bullshit like this. > > Well, it's not really clickbait in my case since I already have a > lifetime subscription to his content. At this point, he doesn't make any > more money from me. Either way, I'm happy that he's pointing out what's > going on in the circles we don't automatically venture to. Without him > pointing it out, I wouldn't have any idea how leftist Mozilla or GNOME > are, and I wouldn't be aware of how much spying Firefox does by default. > I don't see any real reason to dislike him. Reporting that there's a dispute on a Gnome blog about a pro-Antifa dink would be one thing. Insinuating that "Gnome is Antifa" is another. I don't like inaccurate headlines (I call them click bait.) -- Jesus sat with sinners: He didn't sin with them. Know the difference.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web