Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #330042 > unrolled thread

OT: A *truly* presidential response

Started bySnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
First post2015-10-31 22:00 -0700
Last post2015-11-02 13:37 -0500
Articles 20 on this page of 160 — 11 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy


Contents

  OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 22:00 -0700
    Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-01 06:21 +0000
      Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 09:09 -0700
        Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-01 17:03 +0000
          Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 10:12 -0700
            Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-01 17:32 +0000
              Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 10:36 -0700
                Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-01 17:42 +0000
                  Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 10:57 -0700
                    Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-01 18:05 +0000
                      Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 11:27 -0700
                        Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-01 18:48 +0000
                          Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 12:12 -0700
                            Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-01 19:20 +0000
                              Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 12:24 -0700
                        Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 14:54 -0500
                          Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 13:54 -0700
                    Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 14:38 -0500
                      Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 13:26 -0700
                  Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 14:36 -0500
                    Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-01 19:42 +0000
                    Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 13:29 -0700
                      Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 15:37 -0500
                        Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 13:55 -0700
        Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 14:30 -0500
          Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 12:42 -0700
            Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 15:06 -0500
              Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 13:36 -0700
      Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 14:24 -0500
        Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 12:42 -0700
          Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 15:08 -0500
            Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 13:31 -0700
    Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 14:22 -0500
      Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-01 19:39 +0000
        Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 13:40 -0700
      Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 12:43 -0700
        Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 15:09 -0500
          Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 13:38 -0700
            Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 15:57 -0500
              Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 14:09 -0700
    Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 07:15 -0800
      Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 10:40 -0500
        Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 08:09 -0800
          Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 12:27 -0500
            Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 10:31 -0700
              Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 12:49 -0500
                Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 11:22 -0700
                Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 11:30 -0700
                  Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 10:52 -0800
                  Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-02 19:02 +0000
                    Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 12:06 -0700
                      Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 11:16 -0800
                        Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 14:50 -0500
                          Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 13:44 -0700
                            Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 17:41 -0500
                              Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-02 17:43 -0500
                                Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 18:39 -0500
                                  Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 07:51 -0500
                                    Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 09:15 -0500
                                      Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 10:48 -0800
                                      Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 10:50 -0800
                                      Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 13:54 -0500
                              Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-02 23:10 +0000
                                Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 00:17 +0000
                              Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 18:44 -0500
                                Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 19:30 -0500
                                  Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 19:57 -0500
                                    Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 20:47 -0500
                                      Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 21:50 -0500
                        Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-02 12:44 -0800
                          Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 12:55 -0800
                          Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 17:41 -0500
                      Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 14:46 -0500
                        Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 13:49 -0700
                          Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-02 12:56 -0800
                            Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 13:27 -0800
                          Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 13:06 -0800
                            Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-03 07:42 +0000
                              Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 06:55 -0800
                                Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-04 23:28 +0000
                                  Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 15:53 -0800
                                  Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 19:55 -0800
                              Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 09:19 -0800
                                Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 12:20 -0500
                                Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 13:38 -0500
                                  Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 10:56 -0800
                                    Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 14:42 -0500
                                      Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 15:51 -0500
                                        Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 17:12 -0500
                                          Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-04 00:31 +0000
                                            Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 19:37 -0500
                          Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 17:46 -0500
                            Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 18:50 -0500
                              Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 19:36 -0500
                                Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 00:55 +0000
                                  Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 01:08 +0000
                                    Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 01:45 +0000
                                      Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 02:09 +0000
                                        Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 02:30 +0000
                                          Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 02:45 +0000
                                            Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 03:07 +0000
                                              Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 03:54 +0000
                                                Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 05:24 +0000
                                                  Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-03 04:30 -0800
                                                    Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 07:45 -0800
                                                  Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 09:01 -0500
                                                  Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 17:52 +0000
                                                    Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 19:31 +0000
                                              Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 08:51 -0500
                                                Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 09:02 -0500
                                                  Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 09:25 -0500
                                Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 19:55 -0500
                                  Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 20:49 -0500
                                    Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 21:54 -0500
                                      Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 03:03 +0000
                                        Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 03:35 +0000
                                          Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 04:42 +0000
                                            Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 17:46 +0000
                                              Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 19:26 +0000
                                        Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 08:29 -0500
                                          Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 13:35 -0500
                                            Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 14:48 -0500
                                              Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-03 12:03 -0800
                                                Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 15:21 -0500
                                                  Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 15:53 -0500
                                                    Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 17:14 -0500
                                                      Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 17:28 -0500
                                                        Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 18:34 -0500
                                                          Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 18:53 -0500
                                                  Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-03 13:02 -0800
                                              Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 17:08 -0500
                                            Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-03 13:41 -0600
                                      Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 08:36 -0500
                                        Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 08:49 -0500
                                          Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 09:20 -0500
                                            Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 14:17 -0500
                                        Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 09:24 -0800
                                          Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 12:30 -0500
                                        Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 13:36 -0500
                                          Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 19:36 +0000
                                          Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 14:49 -0500
                                            Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 17:09 -0500
                            Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 16:24 -0800
                              Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 19:55 -0600
                                Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-03 07:13 +0000
                                  Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-03 13:02 -0600
                      Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-02 19:53 +0000
                        Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-02 15:21 -0500
                        Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 13:40 -0700
                          Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-02 12:46 -0800
                        Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 12:51 -0800
                        Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 17:38 -0500
            Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 09:59 -0800
        Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 10:27 -0700
          Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-02 18:31 +0100
            Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 12:48 -0500
              Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 11:18 -0700
                Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 13:38 -0500
            Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 11:13 -0700
              Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 13:37 -0500

Page 2 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8  Next page →


#330110

Fromowl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date2015-11-01 19:42 +0000
Message-ID<shgfue9.30fa@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to#330105
Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
> On 2015-11-01 12:42 PM, owl wrote:
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 11/1/15, 10:32 AM, in article seug943.gkai@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 11/1/15, 10:03 AM, in article fhsnv83.f0ae@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
>>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 10/31/15, 11:21 PM, in article sfhue8fa.aerf@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
>>>>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> http://www.jta.org/?p=1086888>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What other candidate is willing to be this direct and honest. Amazing.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For those in COLA who attack Muslims *this* is what I wish you would
>>>>>>>>> learn
>>>>>>>>> from.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fuck Bernie Sanders and all the rest of you radical left-wing appeasers.
>>>>>>>> That hunchback freak must feel right at home with the muslim rapists
>>>>>>>> that are currently destroying Europe.  It's ok though -- women like a
>>>>>>>> good rape, right Bernie?  I notice that the girl didn't seem to want to
>>>>>>>> get too close to him.  I don't blame her.  He was a bit creepy with all
>>>>>>>> that touchy-feely business.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://barbwire.com/2014/12/09/christian-children-murdered-refusing-islami
>>>>>>>> c-
>>>>>>>> co
>>>>>>>> nversion-love-jesus/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Payback is coming soon, bitches.
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I said I *wish* you would learn to give up your bigotry, not that I
>>>>>>> expected
>>>>>>> you to. Sanders is *exactly* right on this, and you are *exactly* wrong.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Prove it.
>>>>>>
>>>>> To me equal rights is a starting premise that needs no proof...
>>>>
>>>> Strawman.
>>>>
>>>>> but we can
>>>>> see from around the world how scape-goating and blaming minorities in a
>>>>> society causes problems.
>>>>
>>>> Pointing the blame at those responsible is not scapegoating.
>>>
>>> The woman in the video is, apparently, a Muslim. Explain what you know SHE
>>> has done wrong. 
>>>
>> 
>> She starts out her rant describing Republican candidates as "islamophobic"
>> and calling Ben Carson and Donald Trump "bigots."  So she's a fucking liar
>> out of the gate.
> 
> Agreed. As far as I know, Trump never made any comments on Islam or on
> Muslims. He targeted Mexicans and said that a good proportion of those
> coming over to the United States, illegally, are criminals but he was
> correct in saying that anyway.
> 
>>> Answer: nothing. You know NOTHING of her. You use her as a scapegoat and are
>>> doing EXACTLY what Sanders talks about. You are, sadly, proving him right.
>>>
>> 
>> I know I would not trust her not to blow herself up in a crowd.
> 
> Until she removes her ninja outfit, I don't trust her either.
> 

LOL "ninja outfit"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#330137

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2015-11-01 13:29 -0700
Message-ID<D25BC42A.6248B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#330105
On 11/1/15, 12:36 PM, in article n15pge$rs3$6@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna"
<.m@nsn.s> wrote:

...
>>> The woman in the video is, apparently, a Muslim. Explain what you know SHE
>>> has done wrong.
>>> 
>> 
>> She starts out her rant describing Republican candidates as "islamophobic"
>> and calling Ben Carson and Donald Trump "bigots."  So she's a fucking liar
>> out of the gate.
> 
> Agreed. As far as I know, Trump never made any comments on Islam or on
> Muslims. He targeted Mexicans and said that a good proportion of those
> coming over to the United States, illegally, are criminals but he was
> correct in saying that anyway.

He has noted many Muslims are "wonderful people" but still speaks of the
"Muslim problem". Now think in terms of other groups: Jews, blacks,
Christians, etc. None of these would be acceptable. It is only because of
the commonality of the bigotry in the US where it is OK to say this about
Muslims. 

>>> Answer: nothing. You know NOTHING of her. You use her as a scapegoat and are
>>> doing EXACTLY what Sanders talks about. You are, sadly, proving him right.
>> 
>> I know I would not trust her not to blow herself up in a crowd.
> 
> Until she removes her ninja outfit, I don't trust her either.

So based on NOTHING she has done, and knowing NOTHING about her, you judge
her differently than you do others. That is my point.


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#330143

FromCharmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s>
Date2015-11-01 15:37 -0500
Message-ID<n15t2h$bo5$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#330137
On 2015-11-01 3:29 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 11/1/15, 12:36 PM, in article n15pge$rs3$6@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna"
> <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
> 
> ...
>>>> The woman in the video is, apparently, a Muslim. Explain what you know SHE
>>>> has done wrong.
>>>>
>>>
>>> She starts out her rant describing Republican candidates as "islamophobic"
>>> and calling Ben Carson and Donald Trump "bigots."  So she's a fucking liar
>>> out of the gate.
>>
>> Agreed. As far as I know, Trump never made any comments on Islam or on
>> Muslims. He targeted Mexicans and said that a good proportion of those
>> coming over to the United States, illegally, are criminals but he was
>> correct in saying that anyway.
> 
> He has noted many Muslims are "wonderful people" but still speaks of the
> "Muslim problem". Now think in terms of other groups: Jews, blacks,
> Christians, etc. None of these would be acceptable. It is only because of
> the commonality of the bigotry in the US where it is OK to say this about
> Muslims. 

There IS a Muslim problem. Denying it is blissful ignorance.

< snip >

-- 
Charmed Tuna

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#330152

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2015-11-01 13:55 -0700
Message-ID<D25BCA5E.624B5%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#330143
On 11/1/15, 1:37 PM, in article n15t2h$bo5$3@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna"
<.m@nsn.s> wrote:

> On 2015-11-01 3:29 PM, Snit wrote:
>> On 11/1/15, 12:36 PM, in article n15pge$rs3$6@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna"
>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>> 
>> ...
>>>>> The woman in the video is, apparently, a Muslim. Explain what you know SHE
>>>>> has done wrong.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> She starts out her rant describing Republican candidates as "islamophobic"
>>>> and calling Ben Carson and Donald Trump "bigots."  So she's a fucking liar
>>>> out of the gate.
>>> 
>>> Agreed. As far as I know, Trump never made any comments on Islam or on
>>> Muslims. He targeted Mexicans and said that a good proportion of those
>>> coming over to the United States, illegally, are criminals but he was
>>> correct in saying that anyway.
>> 
>> He has noted many Muslims are "wonderful people" but still speaks of the
>> "Muslim problem". Now think in terms of other groups: Jews, blacks,
>> Christians, etc. None of these would be acceptable. It is only because of
>> the commonality of the bigotry in the US where it is OK to say this about
>> Muslims. 
> 
> There IS a Muslim problem. Denying it is blissful ignorance.
> 
> < snip >

In the US, right wing Christian terrorism is more of a threat, at least as
judged by most law enforcement agencies. We have more of a Christian problem
than a Muslim one. Of course, this does not mean the term "Christian
problem" is a reasonable one given how most Christians, as with most
Muslims, are not a part of the problem.


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#330103

FromCharmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s>
Date2015-11-01 14:30 -0500
Message-ID<n15p47$rs3$5@dont-email.me>
In reply to#330064
On 2015-11-01 11:09 AM, Snit wrote:
> On 10/31/15, 11:21 PM, in article sfhue8fa.aerf@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> http://www.jta.org/?p=1086888>
>>>
>>> What other candidate is willing to be this direct and honest. Amazing.
>>>
>>> For those in COLA who attack Muslims *this* is what I wish you would learn
>>> from.
>>>
>>
>> Fuck Bernie Sanders and all the rest of you radical left-wing appeasers.
>> That hunchback freak must feel right at home with the muslim rapists
>> that are currently destroying Europe.  It's ok though -- women like a
>> good rape, right Bernie?  I notice that the girl didn't seem to want to
>> get too close to him.  I don't blame her.  He was a bit creepy with all
>> that touchy-feely business.
>>
>> http://barbwire.com/2014/12/09/christian-children-murdered-refusing-islamic-co
>> nversion-love-jesus/
>>
>> Payback is coming soon, bitches.
>>  
> 
> I said I *wish* you would learn to give up your bigotry, not that I expected
> you to. Sanders is *exactly* right on this, and you are *exactly* wrong.

Hating Islam is not bigotry, it's logic. You're the only person who
hasn't yet noticed that no matter how much damage these fuckers do, they
always _successfully_ use the "islamophobia" argument to distract
everyone. It doesn't matter that they gang rape 14 year-olds, carjack
vehicles, kill Christians or take over someone else's home because
denying them that "right" is "islamophobia" and we're all bigots.

Your liberalism is a sickness and I do hope that you'll get well soon.


-- 
Charmed Tuna

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#330111

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2015-11-01 12:42 -0700
Message-ID<D25BB939.62463%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#330103
On 11/1/15, 12:30 PM, in article n15p47$rs3$5@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna"
<.m@nsn.s> wrote:

>>> Fuck Bernie Sanders and all the rest of you radical left-wing appeasers.
>>> That hunchback freak must feel right at home with the muslim rapists
>>> that are currently destroying Europe.  It's ok though -- women like a
>>> good rape, right Bernie?  I notice that the girl didn't seem to want to
>>> get too close to him.  I don't blame her.  He was a bit creepy with all
>>> that touchy-feely business.
>>> 
>>> http://barbwire.com/2014/12/09/christian-children-murdered-refusing-islamic-
>>> co
>>> nversion-love-jesus/
>>> 
>>> Payback is coming soon, bitches.
>>>  
>> 
>> I said I *wish* you would learn to give up your bigotry, not that I expected
>> you to. Sanders is *exactly* right on this, and you are *exactly* wrong.
> 
> Hating Islam is not bigotry, it's logic.

Same can be said of Christianity. But I do not hate either. I do not, of
course, approve of all acts done in the names of these religions!

> You're the only person who hasn't yet noticed that no matter how much damage
> these fuckers do,

What damage has the woman in the video I shown done? I do not know of any.

> they always _successfully_ use the "islamophobia" argument
> to distract everyone. It doesn't matter that they gang rape 14 year-olds,
> carjack vehicles, kill Christians or take over someone else's home because
> denying them that "right" is "islamophobia" and we're all bigots.

I do not see any evidence she has done as you say Muslims do. I do not see
any evidence she backs it. She might... but there is no evidence to suggest
it.

> Your liberalism is a sickness and I do hope that you'll get well soon.

I back equal rights and personal responsibility. You can call that a
"sickness" but I will not change it.


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#330129

FromCharmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s>
Date2015-11-01 15:06 -0500
Message-ID<n15r8p$66d$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#330111
On 2015-11-01 2:42 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 11/1/15, 12:30 PM, in article n15p47$rs3$5@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna"
> <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
> 
>>>> Fuck Bernie Sanders and all the rest of you radical left-wing appeasers.
>>>> That hunchback freak must feel right at home with the muslim rapists
>>>> that are currently destroying Europe.  It's ok though -- women like a
>>>> good rape, right Bernie?  I notice that the girl didn't seem to want to
>>>> get too close to him.  I don't blame her.  He was a bit creepy with all
>>>> that touchy-feely business.
>>>>
>>>> http://barbwire.com/2014/12/09/christian-children-murdered-refusing-islamic-
>>>> co
>>>> nversion-love-jesus/
>>>>
>>>> Payback is coming soon, bitches.
>>>>  
>>>
>>> I said I *wish* you would learn to give up your bigotry, not that I expected
>>> you to. Sanders is *exactly* right on this, and you are *exactly* wrong.
>>
>> Hating Islam is not bigotry, it's logic.
> 
> Same can be said of Christianity. But I do not hate either. I do not, of
> course, approve of all acts done in the names of these religions!
> 
>> You're the only person who hasn't yet noticed that no matter how much damage
>> these fuckers do,
> 
> What damage has the woman in the video I shown done? I do not know of any.

Her headdress, for one, while not damaging in any real sense still
encourages women to believe that it is appropriate and somehow even
liberating for them to cover themselves up when in public. I don't
respect the headdress and would love to see it be forcefully removed
from my society like it has been in France. However, she lied about
Trump and claimed that he had offended Islam when he had done no such
thing. She defamed him -  probably because she expects that he won't be
favorable to overlooking Muslims' crimes - and should be charged since
no evidence exists that he discriminates against Islam in any way.

>> they always _successfully_ use the "islamophobia" argument
>> to distract everyone. It doesn't matter that they gang rape 14 year-olds,
>> carjack vehicles, kill Christians or take over someone else's home because
>> denying them that "right" is "islamophobia" and we're all bigots.
> 
> I do not see any evidence she has done as you say Muslims do. I do not see
> any evidence she backs it. She might... but there is no evidence to suggest
> it.

She mentioned islamophobia so I'm not sure how you managed not to
see/hear that evidence.

>> Your liberalism is a sickness and I do hope that you'll get well soon.
> 
> I back equal rights and personal responsibility. You can call that a
> "sickness" but I will not change it.

And that's fine, but respect anyone who believes that the Western world
needs to take a conservative, prudent, Christian approach to dealing
with the Muslims. The Christian faith has helped to build the West into
a society where people are respected, crimes are punished and good
values are advocated. Islam preaches hatred, discrimination and a
patriarchy. One is good for the United States and the other should be
decimated at all costs regardless of how peaceful its faithful believe
that they and their "religion" are.


-- 
Charmed Tuna

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#330141

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2015-11-01 13:36 -0700
Message-ID<D25BC5FB.6249C%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#330129
On 11/1/15, 1:06 PM, in article n15r8p$66d$1@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna"
<.m@nsn.s> wrote:

> On 2015-11-01 2:42 PM, Snit wrote:
>> On 11/1/15, 12:30 PM, in article n15p47$rs3$5@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna"
>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>> 
>>>>> Fuck Bernie Sanders and all the rest of you radical left-wing appeasers.
>>>>> That hunchback freak must feel right at home with the muslim rapists
>>>>> that are currently destroying Europe.  It's ok though -- women like a
>>>>> good rape, right Bernie?  I notice that the girl didn't seem to want to
>>>>> get too close to him.  I don't blame her.  He was a bit creepy with all
>>>>> that touchy-feely business.
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://barbwire.com/2014/12/09/christian-children-murdered-refusing-islami
>>>>> c-
>>>>> co
>>>>> nversion-love-jesus/
>>>>> 
>>>>> Payback is coming soon, bitches.
>>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> I said I *wish* you would learn to give up your bigotry, not that I
>>>> expected
>>>> you to. Sanders is *exactly* right on this, and you are *exactly* wrong.
>>> 
>>> Hating Islam is not bigotry, it's logic.
>> 
>> Same can be said of Christianity. But I do not hate either. I do not, of
>> course, approve of all acts done in the names of these religions!
>> 
>>> You're the only person who hasn't yet noticed that no matter how much damage
>>> these fuckers do,
>> 
>> What damage has the woman in the video I shown done? I do not know of any.
> 
> Her headdress, for one, while not damaging in any real sense still
> encourages women to believe that it is appropriate and somehow even
> liberating for them to cover themselves up when in public.

I think people should wear pretty much whatever they want. Nothing indecent
about her clothing.

> I don't respect the headdress and would love to see it be forcefully removed
> from my society like it has been in France. However, she lied about Trump and
> claimed that he had offended Islam when he had done no such thing. She defamed
> him -  probably because she expects that he won't be favorable to overlooking
> Muslims' crimes - and should be charged since no evidence exists that he
> discriminates against Islam in any way.

He has spoken of the "Muslim problem". Imagine if Sanders' walked around
speaking of the "Christian problem". Would you find that acceptable?
 
I would NOT. Sure, many Christians act in reprehensible ways and even push a
lie about a "War on Christmas", demand special entitlements, etc. But I do
not put this on ALL Christians.

>>> they always _successfully_ use the "islamophobia" argument
>>> to distract everyone. It doesn't matter that they gang rape 14 year-olds,
>>> carjack vehicles, kill Christians or take over someone else's home because
>>> denying them that "right" is "islamophobia" and we're all bigots.
>> 
>> I do not see any evidence she has done as you say Muslims do. I do not see
>> any evidence she backs it. She might... but there is no evidence to suggest
>> it.
> 
> She mentioned islamophobia so I'm not sure how you managed not to
> see/hear that evidence.

What is wrong with her mentioning that? If Sanders talked about
anti-Semitism would that be bad?

>>> Your liberalism is a sickness and I do hope that you'll get well soon.
>> 
>> I back equal rights and personal responsibility. You can call that a
>> "sickness" but I will not change it.
> 
> And that's fine, but respect anyone who believes that the Western world
> needs to take a conservative, prudent, Christian approach to dealing
> with the Muslims. The Christian faith has helped to build the West into
> a society where people are respected, crimes are punished and good
> values are advocated. Islam preaches hatred, discrimination and a
> patriarchy. One is good for the United States and the other should be
> decimated at all costs regardless of how peaceful its faithful believe
> that they and their "religion" are.

I say equal rights and personal responsibility. Any Muslim or Christian who
works against that I think is wrong to do so. Or, of course, any Jew or
atheist or anyone else.



-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#330097

FromCharmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s>
Date2015-11-01 14:24 -0500
Message-ID<n15opo$rs3$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#330044
On 2015-11-01 1:21 AM, owl wrote:
> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> http://www.jta.org/?p=1086888>
>>
>> What other candidate is willing to be this direct and honest. Amazing.
>>
>> For those in COLA who attack Muslims *this* is what I wish you would learn
>> from.
>>
> 
> Fuck Bernie Sanders and all the rest of you radical left-wing appeasers.

+1.

> That hunchback freak must feel right at home with the muslim rapists
> that are currently destroying Europe.  It's ok though -- women like a
> good rape, right Bernie?  I notice that the girl didn't seem to want to
> get too close to him.  I don't blame her.  He was a bit creepy with all
> that touchy-feely business.
> 
> http://barbwire.com/2014/12/09/christian-children-murdered-refusing-islamic-conversion-love-jesus/
> 
> Payback is coming soon, bitches.

It's only a matter of time before society discards political correctness
entirely and hangs these people by the balls. It's what they deserve.

-- 
Charmed Tuna

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#330112

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2015-11-01 12:42 -0700
Message-ID<D25BB94F.62464%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#330097
On 11/1/15, 12:24 PM, in article n15opo$rs3$2@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna"
<.m@nsn.s> wrote:

> On 2015-11-01 1:21 AM, owl wrote:
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> http://www.jta.org/?p=1086888>
>>> 
>>> What other candidate is willing to be this direct and honest. Amazing.
>>> 
>>> For those in COLA who attack Muslims *this* is what I wish you would learn
>>> from.
>>> 
>> 
>> Fuck Bernie Sanders and all the rest of you radical left-wing appeasers.
> 
> +1.
> 
>> That hunchback freak must feel right at home with the muslim rapists
>> that are currently destroying Europe.  It's ok though -- women like a
>> good rape, right Bernie?  I notice that the girl didn't seem to want to
>> get too close to him.  I don't blame her.  He was a bit creepy with all
>> that touchy-feely business.
>> 
>> http://barbwire.com/2014/12/09/christian-children-murdered-refusing-islamic-c
>> onversion-love-jesus/
>> 
>> Payback is coming soon, bitches.
> 
> It's only a matter of time before society discards political correctness
> entirely and hangs these people by the balls. It's what they deserve.

What has the woman in the video I pointed to done? Where is the evidence?


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#330130

FromCharmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s>
Date2015-11-01 15:08 -0500
Message-ID<n15rbg$66d$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#330112
On 2015-11-01 2:42 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 11/1/15, 12:24 PM, in article n15opo$rs3$2@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna"
> <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
> 
>> On 2015-11-01 1:21 AM, owl wrote:
>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>> http://www.jta.org/?p=1086888>
>>>>
>>>> What other candidate is willing to be this direct and honest. Amazing.
>>>>
>>>> For those in COLA who attack Muslims *this* is what I wish you would learn
>>>> from.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Fuck Bernie Sanders and all the rest of you radical left-wing appeasers.
>>
>> +1.
>>
>>> That hunchback freak must feel right at home with the muslim rapists
>>> that are currently destroying Europe.  It's ok though -- women like a
>>> good rape, right Bernie?  I notice that the girl didn't seem to want to
>>> get too close to him.  I don't blame her.  He was a bit creepy with all
>>> that touchy-feely business.
>>>
>>> http://barbwire.com/2014/12/09/christian-children-murdered-refusing-islamic-c
>>> onversion-love-jesus/
>>>
>>> Payback is coming soon, bitches.
>>
>> It's only a matter of time before society discards political correctness
>> entirely and hangs these people by the balls. It's what they deserve.
> 
> What has the woman in the video I pointed to done? Where is the evidence?

She publicly defamed Trump. You can't make such statements without
evidence and if you do, you should be held accountable. Anyone who said
such lies against a Muslim would see their life threatened, I don't see
why she is allowed to get off without any kind of repercussions because
of "islamophobia."

-- 
Charmed Tuna

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#330138

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2015-11-01 13:31 -0700
Message-ID<D25BC4B2.6248D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#330130
On 11/1/15, 1:08 PM, in article n15rbg$66d$2@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna"
<.m@nsn.s> wrote:

>>>> That hunchback freak must feel right at home with the muslim rapists
>>>> that are currently destroying Europe.  It's ok though -- women like a
>>>> good rape, right Bernie?  I notice that the girl didn't seem to want to
>>>> get too close to him.  I don't blame her.  He was a bit creepy with all
>>>> that touchy-feely business.
>>>> 
>>>> http://barbwire.com/2014/12/09/christian-children-murdered-refusing-islamic
>>>> -c
>>>> onversion-love-jesus/
>>>> 
>>>> Payback is coming soon, bitches.
>>> 
>>> It's only a matter of time before society discards political correctness
>>> entirely and hangs these people by the balls. It's what they deserve.
>> 
>> What has the woman in the video I pointed to done? Where is the evidence?
> 
> She publicly defamed Trump. You can't make such statements without
> evidence and if you do, you should be held accountable.

Trump has spoken of the "Muslim problem". But what problem is she, a Muslim,
bringing to the country? None that we know of.

> Anyone who said such lies against a Muslim would see their life threatened, I
> don't see why she is allowed to get off without any kind of repercussions
> because of "islamophobia."

What lie? 

I do find it amazing who conservatives tend to pick as their examples of
fine citizens: <https://youtu.be/47NWmhalMD8>.

Great bit. :)

-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#330095

FromCharmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s>
Date2015-11-01 14:22 -0500
Message-ID<n15oma$rs3$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#330042
On 2015-11-01 1:00 AM, Snit wrote:
> http://www.jta.org/?p=1086888>
> 
> What other candidate is willing to be this direct and honest. Amazing.
> 
> For those in COLA who attack Muslims *this* is what I wish you would learn
> from.

There is nothing wrong with hating Islam. It's a despicable religion and
its faithful enjoy acting like victims to make you believe that they're
peaceful while they simultaneously rape your women and behead anyone
whom they believe offended their prophet, their god or their faith in
general.

Unfortunately, a lot of brainwashed liberals subscribe to the belief
that there is such a thing as islamophobia; there isn't. Anyone who
reads about Islam and sees what Muslims do to "infidels" and even to
each other around the world knows that its faithful cannot be trusted
and that it is best to keep their guard up with them. Unfortunately, you
believe that Islam is no worse than Christianity even though it is clear
to everyone that it is an aggressive "faith" which encourages killing,
raping and enslaving. It's not the rest of the newsgroup which needs to
wake up, it's you.

-- 
Charmed Tuna

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#330107

Fromowl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date2015-11-01 19:39 +0000
Message-ID<sefaao.bj3@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to#330095
Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
> On 2015-11-01 1:00 AM, Snit wrote:
>> http://www.jta.org/?p=1086888>
>> 
>> What other candidate is willing to be this direct and honest. Amazing.
>> 
>> For those in COLA who attack Muslims *this* is what I wish you would learn
>> from.
> 
> There is nothing wrong with hating Islam. It's a despicable religion and
> its faithful enjoy acting like victims to make you believe that they're
> peaceful while they simultaneously rape your women and behead anyone
> whom they believe offended their prophet, their god or their faith in
> general.
> 
> Unfortunately, a lot of brainwashed liberals subscribe to the belief
> that there is such a thing as islamophobia; there isn't. Anyone who
> reads about Islam and sees what Muslims do to "infidels" and even to
> each other around the world knows that its faithful cannot be trusted
> and that it is best to keep their guard up with them. Unfortunately, you
> believe that Islam is no worse than Christianity even though it is clear
> to everyone that it is an aggressive "faith" which encourages killing,
> raping and enslaving. It's not the rest of the newsgroup which needs to
> wake up, it's you.
> 

Your wisdom is wasted on that one.  His brain has been washed to mush.
We can only pray that Bernie decides to run as an independent when he
loses the Democrat nomination.  The fact that this scumbag actually *is*
an independent, not a Democrat, says everything about his character.
He has no business running as a false Democrat.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#330147

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2015-11-01 13:40 -0700
Message-ID<D25BC6C0.6249F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#330107
On 11/1/15, 12:39 PM, in article sefaao.bj3@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
<owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:

> Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>> On 2015-11-01 1:00 AM, Snit wrote:
>>> http://www.jta.org/?p=1086888>
>>> 
>>> What other candidate is willing to be this direct and honest. Amazing.
>>> 
>>> For those in COLA who attack Muslims *this* is what I wish you would learn
>>> from.
>> 
>> There is nothing wrong with hating Islam. It's a despicable religion and
>> its faithful enjoy acting like victims to make you believe that they're
>> peaceful while they simultaneously rape your women and behead anyone
>> whom they believe offended their prophet, their god or their faith in
>> general.
>> 
>> Unfortunately, a lot of brainwashed liberals subscribe to the belief
>> that there is such a thing as islamophobia; there isn't. Anyone who
>> reads about Islam and sees what Muslims do to "infidels" and even to
>> each other around the world knows that its faithful cannot be trusted
>> and that it is best to keep their guard up with them. Unfortunately, you
>> believe that Islam is no worse than Christianity even though it is clear
>> to everyone that it is an aggressive "faith" which encourages killing,
>> raping and enslaving. It's not the rest of the newsgroup which needs to
>> wake up, it's you.
>> 
> 
> Your wisdom is wasted on that one.  His brain has been washed to mush.
> We can only pray that Bernie decides to run as an independent when he
> loses the Democrat nomination.  The fact that this scumbag actually *is*
> an independent, not a Democrat, says everything about his character.
> He has no business running as a false Democrat.
> 
<http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bigot>
    -----
    a person who strongly and unfairly dislikes other people, ideas,
    etc. : a bigoted person; especially : a person who hates or
    refuses to accept the members of a particular group (such as a
    racial or religious group)
    -----

The two of you are painting over 1 billion people with the same brush
because of their religion. By definition that is a form of bigotry.

As far as Sanders, I look forward to his upcoming speech where he talks more
about his views on Socialism and what he means by it. I think he owes that
to the American people.




-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#330113

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2015-11-01 12:43 -0700
Message-ID<D25BB97E.62465%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#330095
On 11/1/15, 12:22 PM, in article n15oma$rs3$1@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna"
<.m@nsn.s> wrote:

> On 2015-11-01 1:00 AM, Snit wrote:
>> http://www.jta.org/?p=1086888>
>> 
>> What other candidate is willing to be this direct and honest. Amazing.
>> 
>> For those in COLA who attack Muslims *this* is what I wish you would learn
>> from.
> 
> There is nothing wrong with hating Islam.

No more than there being anything wrong with hating Christianity.

> It's a despicable religion and
> its faithful enjoy acting like victims to make you believe that they're
> peaceful while they simultaneously rape your women and behead anyone
> whom they believe offended their prophet, their god or their faith in
> general.
> 
> Unfortunately, a lot of brainwashed liberals subscribe to the belief
> that there is such a thing as islamophobia; there isn't. Anyone who
> reads about Islam and sees what Muslims do to "infidels" and even to
> each other around the world knows that its faithful cannot be trusted
> and that it is best to keep their guard up with them. Unfortunately, you
> believe that Islam is no worse than Christianity even though it is clear
> to everyone that it is an aggressive "faith" which encourages killing,
> raping and enslaving. It's not the rest of the newsgroup which needs to
> wake up, it's you.

What has the woman in the video done wrong? I do not see it.

-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#330131

FromCharmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s>
Date2015-11-01 15:09 -0500
Message-ID<n15rdl$66d$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#330113
On 2015-11-01 2:43 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 11/1/15, 12:22 PM, in article n15oma$rs3$1@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna"
> <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
> 
>> On 2015-11-01 1:00 AM, Snit wrote:
>>> http://www.jta.org/?p=1086888>
>>>
>>> What other candidate is willing to be this direct and honest. Amazing.
>>>
>>> For those in COLA who attack Muslims *this* is what I wish you would learn
>>> from.
>>
>> There is nothing wrong with hating Islam.
> 
> No more than there being anything wrong with hating Christianity.

You can hate it all that you want and true Christians won't care because
we have been told to turn the other cheek to all forms of assault
against us.

>> It's a despicable religion and
>> its faithful enjoy acting like victims to make you believe that they're
>> peaceful while they simultaneously rape your women and behead anyone
>> whom they believe offended their prophet, their god or their faith in
>> general.
>>
>> Unfortunately, a lot of brainwashed liberals subscribe to the belief
>> that there is such a thing as islamophobia; there isn't. Anyone who
>> reads about Islam and sees what Muslims do to "infidels" and even to
>> each other around the world knows that its faithful cannot be trusted
>> and that it is best to keep their guard up with them. Unfortunately, you
>> believe that Islam is no worse than Christianity even though it is clear
>> to everyone that it is an aggressive "faith" which encourages killing,
>> raping and enslaving. It's not the rest of the newsgroup which needs to
>> wake up, it's you.
> 
> What has the woman in the video done wrong? I do not see it.

Liberalism has made you blind, I am not surprised.

-- 
Charmed Tuna

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#330144

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2015-11-01 13:38 -0700
Message-ID<D25BC658.6249D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#330131
On 11/1/15, 1:09 PM, in article n15rdl$66d$3@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna"
<.m@nsn.s> wrote:

> On 2015-11-01 2:43 PM, Snit wrote:
>> On 11/1/15, 12:22 PM, in article n15oma$rs3$1@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna"
>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2015-11-01 1:00 AM, Snit wrote:
>>>> http://www.jta.org/?p=1086888>
>>>> 
>>>> What other candidate is willing to be this direct and honest. Amazing.
>>>> 
>>>> For those in COLA who attack Muslims *this* is what I wish you would learn
>>>> from.
>>> 
>>> There is nothing wrong with hating Islam.
>> 
>> No more than there being anything wrong with hating Christianity.
> 
> You can hate it all that you want and true Christians won't care because
> we have been told to turn the other cheek to all forms of assault
> against us.

But yet many will. Heck, I personally have had rocks thrown at me, been told
I will burn in hell forever, etc. just because I stand up and said
non-Christian (and non-offensive) prayers at scout camps.

>>> It's a despicable religion and
>>> its faithful enjoy acting like victims to make you believe that they're
>>> peaceful while they simultaneously rape your women and behead anyone
>>> whom they believe offended their prophet, their god or their faith in
>>> general.
>>> 
>>> Unfortunately, a lot of brainwashed liberals subscribe to the belief
>>> that there is such a thing as islamophobia; there isn't. Anyone who
>>> reads about Islam and sees what Muslims do to "infidels" and even to
>>> each other around the world knows that its faithful cannot be trusted
>>> and that it is best to keep their guard up with them. Unfortunately, you
>>> believe that Islam is no worse than Christianity even though it is clear
>>> to everyone that it is an aggressive "faith" which encourages killing,
>>> raping and enslaving. It's not the rest of the newsgroup which needs to
>>> wake up, it's you.
>> 
>> What has the woman in the video done wrong? I do not see it.
> 
> Liberalism has made you blind, I am not surprised.

What has she done wrong? Elsewhere you say her clothing offends you. That is
about you, though, not her.

-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#330153

FromCharmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s>
Date2015-11-01 15:57 -0500
Message-ID<n15u88$hj7$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#330144
On 2015-11-01 3:38 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 11/1/15, 1:09 PM, in article n15rdl$66d$3@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna"
> <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
> 
>> On 2015-11-01 2:43 PM, Snit wrote:
>>> On 11/1/15, 12:22 PM, in article n15oma$rs3$1@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna"
>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2015-11-01 1:00 AM, Snit wrote:
>>>>> http://www.jta.org/?p=1086888>
>>>>>
>>>>> What other candidate is willing to be this direct and honest. Amazing.
>>>>>
>>>>> For those in COLA who attack Muslims *this* is what I wish you would learn
>>>>> from.
>>>>
>>>> There is nothing wrong with hating Islam.
>>>
>>> No more than there being anything wrong with hating Christianity.
>>
>> You can hate it all that you want and true Christians won't care because
>> we have been told to turn the other cheek to all forms of assault
>> against us.
> 
> But yet many will. Heck, I personally have had rocks thrown at me, been told
> I will burn in hell forever, etc. just because I stand up and said
> non-Christian (and non-offensive) prayers at scout camps.

Are you sure that was the reason? You seem (like me) to attract negative
attention wherever you go. :)

>>>> It's a despicable religion and
>>>> its faithful enjoy acting like victims to make you believe that they're
>>>> peaceful while they simultaneously rape your women and behead anyone
>>>> whom they believe offended their prophet, their god or their faith in
>>>> general.
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately, a lot of brainwashed liberals subscribe to the belief
>>>> that there is such a thing as islamophobia; there isn't. Anyone who
>>>> reads about Islam and sees what Muslims do to "infidels" and even to
>>>> each other around the world knows that its faithful cannot be trusted
>>>> and that it is best to keep their guard up with them. Unfortunately, you
>>>> believe that Islam is no worse than Christianity even though it is clear
>>>> to everyone that it is an aggressive "faith" which encourages killing,
>>>> raping and enslaving. It's not the rest of the newsgroup which needs to
>>>> wake up, it's you.
>>>
>>> What has the woman in the video done wrong? I do not see it.
>>
>> Liberalism has made you blind, I am not surprised.
> 
> What has she done wrong? Elsewhere you say her clothing offends you. That is
> about you, though, not her.

The clothing offends me because I know, very well, that it isn't being
worn for religious reasons at all. Instead, it is worn specifically for
the purpose of standing out and excluding themselves from society. They
WANT to offend or piss off others and not because, like teenagers, they
need to feel unique. They want to push against us as much as they can
and see if they can get a reaction. Once they do, they will claim that
they're being victimized UNTIL they have the numbers and attack everyone
in sight to start their idiotic jihad. The best course of action is to
ban their headdress now and force them to integrate. Those who refuse
are welcome to return to the shithole from whence they came. You'll call
it censorship, I call it a preemptive strike.

How do I know? Some of my friends speak Arabic and worked in immigration
offices. The women were very honest about their intentions with people
whom they believed were of the same faith. It's only with Christians and
Atheists that they suddenly acted all poor and innocent and only because
they were all, like you, gullible.

-- 
Charmed Tuna

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#330160

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2015-11-01 14:09 -0700
Message-ID<D25BCDA2.624BD%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#330153
On 11/1/15, 1:57 PM, in article n15u88$hj7$1@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna"
<.m@nsn.s> wrote:

...
>>>> No more than there being anything wrong with hating Christianity.
>>> 
>>> You can hate it all that you want and true Christians won't care because
>>> we have been told to turn the other cheek to all forms of assault
>>> against us.
>> 
>> But yet many will. Heck, I personally have had rocks thrown at me, been told
>> I will burn in hell forever, etc. just because I stand up and said
>> non-Christian (and non-offensive) prayers at scout camps.
> 
> Are you sure that was the reason? You seem (like me) to attract negative
> attention wherever you go. :)

After 10 times of hearing prayers where they spoke of Jesus I would offer to
say the prayer before the meal. I said it in Hebrew and then gave the
English translation. Basically "Thank you God for the food we are about to
eat".

Also had Scout leaders repeatedly telling me I was going to burn in hell for
being Jewish.

Had a kid in my middle school repeatedly attack me for being Jewish - with
me just calmly talking to him. In 9th grade he approached me and apologized
and told me he was raised in a house with KKK members and thought all Jews
were evil. I taught him otherwise.

I had a 5th grade teacher who insisted I do an art project with a Christmas
tree... so I did: the tree was tiny and the star on top was a Jewish star
(Star of David) which took up most of the paper. I got in trouble for that
and was sent to the office. The principle told me I was in the wrong.

On and on... I have seen lots of Christians push their religion and attack
myself and others for not sharing their religion. To be clear, though, NOT
saying this is all Christians. Not at all.

... 
>>> Liberalism has made you blind, I am not surprised.
>> 
>> What has she done wrong? Elsewhere you say her clothing offends you. That is
>> about you, though, not her.
> 
> The clothing offends me because I know, very well, that it isn't being
> worn for religious reasons at all.

I accept she should be free to wear what she wants (well, there are decency
laws, but you get the idea).

> Instead, it is worn specifically for the purpose of standing out and excluding
> themselves from society.

How do you know HER reasoning?

> They WANT to offend or piss off others and not because, like teenagers, they
> need to feel unique.

You could say this about someone wearing a cross or a yamaka.

> They want to push against us as much as they can and see if they can get a
> reaction. Once they do, they will claim that they're being victimized UNTIL
> they have the numbers and attack everyone in sight to start their idiotic
> jihad. The best course of action is to ban their headdress now and force them
> to integrate. Those who refuse are welcome to return to the shithole from
> whence they came. You'll call it censorship, I call it a preemptive strike.

I personally like seeing people wearing different styles of clothing and
eating different foods, etc. I *do* see it is as a problem if she is being
forced to wear that style of clothing against her will.

> How do I know? Some of my friends speak Arabic and worked in immigration
> offices. The women were very honest about their intentions with people whom
> they believed were of the same faith. It's only with Christians and Atheists
> that they suddenly acted all poor and innocent and only because they were all,
> like you, gullible.

You are pretending to know HER reasons. But you have no evidence.

-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy


csiph-web