Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #328955 > unrolled thread
| Started by | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-27 21:55 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-10-28 00:18 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 194 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-10-27 21:55 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 15:16 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-27 22:16 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 15:32 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-10-27 22:36 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 15:45 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-27 23:21 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-27 20:07 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 00:34 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 17:41 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-28 01:49 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 17:56 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 08:47 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 08:50 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 13:36 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 10:50 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 14:22 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 11:48 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 17:13 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 14:21 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 00:57 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 08:49 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 08:52 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 16:06 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 09:17 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 09:53 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 14:07 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 13:37 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 10:46 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 04:36 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-28 00:48 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 09:01 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 09:04 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 08:44 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 08:47 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-28 11:27 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 02:35 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 20:06 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-29 05:11 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 10:11 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 15:39 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-29 12:11 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 12:28 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-29 12:30 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 09:49 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 11:25 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 09:52 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 17:01 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 13:23 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 12:05 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 11:30 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 20:37 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 17:20 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 21:53 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 01:18 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 01:58 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 02:32 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 05:16 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 09:04 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-30 09:42 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 17:03 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 17:27 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 13:28 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 15:32 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 09:06 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 20:25 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 14:16 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 16:50 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 17:48 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 10:29 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 07:43 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 12:23 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 09:48 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-30 09:48 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 11:28 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 17:08 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 13:19 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 17:30 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 17:47 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 17:52 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 13:55 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 03:53 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-31 06:05 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 08:49 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 16:28 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 09:54 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 17:02 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 11:14 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 13:19 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 10:44 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 18:03 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 11:21 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 20:34 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 16:46 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 08:50 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 10:06 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 15:41 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 11:29 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 16:36 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 09:56 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 13:57 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 20:35 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 03:51 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-30 06:07 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-30 09:32 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-30 14:38 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 09:57 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-30 15:02 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 10:15 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-30 10:08 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 12:33 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 10:04 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 10:18 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 15:32 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 00:59 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 01:18 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 01:33 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 01:41 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 02:07 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 21:57 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-31 10:12 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 10:42 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 21:56 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-31 18:02 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-31 14:35 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-31 22:56 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 12:03 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 23:44 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-31 02:22 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 13:49 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-31 09:05 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-10-31 20:21 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:40 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 23:57 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 09:47 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 16:37 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-29 12:44 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 14:00 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-29 15:10 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 20:41 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 22:25 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 18:45 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 01:22 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 02:12 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 20:36 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 15:34 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 09:59 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 17:20 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 11:15 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 00:59 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 18:16 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 18:44 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 02:01 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 19:06 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 19:11 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 02:29 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 19:48 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 03:01 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 20:05 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 03:11 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 20:21 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 03:27 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 20:36 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 03:46 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 21:16 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 04:23 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 08:34 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 15:55 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 09:07 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 20:11 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 08:56 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 09:03 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 19:50 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 03:23 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 20:40 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 03:50 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 21:15 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 07:07 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 09:02 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 09:05 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 13:40 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 10:57 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 14:06 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 11:21 -0700
The Quran Peaceful? My ass Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-28 14:32 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 08:35 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 16:01 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 21:00 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 18:01 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 17:41 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 17:02 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-27 19:30 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 17:05 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 00:18 +0000
Page 8 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 Next page →
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 22:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fa33.padffa@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #329561 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 10/29/15, 1:41 PM, in article fshgmcnbj83.sjd@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>
...
>>
>> Just like niggers and faggots have a false martyr complex, eh Jeb?
>
> Those are insults. I am open to seeing how Xian is. Can you show it?
>
I'm a Christian an I find it insulting. Other Christians do also.
That's about all you need to know about it. Just as blacks are insulted
by the lazy forms of the word "Negro" ("Niggra" and "Nigger").
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 18:45 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0u7da$1t7$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #329582 |
On 2015-10-29 6:25 PM, owl wrote:
> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 10/29/15, 1:41 PM, in article fshgmcnbj83.sjd@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>
> ...
>>>
>>> Just like niggers and faggots have a false martyr complex, eh Jeb?
>>
>> Those are insults. I am open to seeing how Xian is. Can you show it?
>>
>
> I'm a Christian an I find it insulting. Other Christians do also.
> That's about all you need to know about it. Just as blacks are insulted
> by the lazy forms of the word "Negro" ("Niggra" and "Nigger").
It insults me too. If you're going to refer to Christmas, then have the
decency to refer to its origins which were a celebration of Jesus's
supposed birth (even though the date itself is actually a compromise of
the winter solstice Roman pagans celebrated and Jesus' birthday which
was more than likely around September). It doesn't matter that Christmas
has since been bastardized into a worship of Saint Nicholas (whose name
was modified to Santa Claus because people are stupid), it's still a
celebration of Christ's birth and that's all it should be.
--
Charmed Tuna
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-30 01:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <adfue93.adjf@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #329582 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 10/29/15, 3:25 PM, in article fa33.padffa@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 10/29/15, 1:41 PM, in article fshgmcnbj83.sjd@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>> ...
>>
>>>>
>>>> Just like niggers and faggots have a false martyr complex, eh Jeb?
>>>
>>> Those are insults. I am open to seeing how Xian is. Can you show it?
>>
>> I'm a Christian an I find it insulting.
>
> Irrelevant.
>
Absolutely relevant.
>> Other Christians do also. That's about all you need to know about it. Just as
>> blacks are insulted by the lazy forms of the word "Negro" ("Niggra" and
>> "Nigger").
>
> Not at all the same thing.
Absolutely the same thing.
> You do NOT have a right to not be offended.
Of course I do.
> You
> have not shown at all how the term is in any way bigoted or against
> Christians.
>
It is used by atheist bigots to denigrate Christianity by X'ing out
"Christ" from "Christmas" and "Christian."
> As I said, I tend to not use it simply because I do not know the history of
> it - though as I showed with Xmas the X is not an offensive thing in Xmas,
> or at least has not been historically.
>
Do you commonly spout off your opinion on things you don't know about?
Oh that's right... of course you do.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-30 02:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fshentu3.akg@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #329614 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/29/15, 6:22 PM, in article adfue93.adjf@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 10/29/15, 3:25 PM, in article fa33.padffa@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 10/29/15, 1:41 PM, in article fshgmcnbj83.sjd@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>> ... >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Just like niggers and faggots have a false martyr complex, eh Jeb? >>>>> >>>>> Those are insults. I am open to seeing how Xian is. Can you show it? >>>> >>>> I'm a Christian an I find it insulting. >>> >>> Irrelevant. >> >> Absolutely relevant. > > How is it relevant? What if I said I found the term "Christian" to be Blah. Your atheist privilege is showing. "Xmas" is just as offensive to some Christians as "Nigger" is to a black. I don't find the words "nigger" and "faggot" offensive. Does that mean that they are not offensive to others? And this is not just a case of whether or not some random Christian is offended by the term. The truth is that Jeb is using it intentionally to be offensive. So this is not a matter of an atheist being immune to the offense and therefore not being able to comprehend it -- here we have Jeb, and atheist with a chip on his shoulder for whatever reason, going out of his way to offend. Even after this was pointed out to him, instead of apologizing he goes on a defensive rant, accusing Christians of being "butthurt" and "false martyrs". (Now that's rich -- Christians as "false martyrs" -- I wonder how he would like being lion food for Roman entertainment). JEDEDIAH is a unrepentant bigot. And if you condone that language, then you are a bigot as well.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 20:36 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <4LWdnS32U_RZSq_LnZ2dnUU7-SWdnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #329539 |
On 10/29/15 13:27, Snit wrote: > On 10/29/15, 12:00 PM, in article slrnn34r69.rjp.jedi@nomad.mishnet, > "JEDIDIAH"<jedi@nomad.mishnet> wrote: > >> On 2015-10-29, Big Fish in a Small Crotch<bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> >> wrote: >>> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 16:37:48 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>> >>>> JEDIDIAH<jedi@nomad.mishnet> wrote: >>>>> On 2015-10-29, ronb<ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:27:04 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> ...I've always called fundies "American Talibani" or something >>>>>>> comparable. >>>>>> >>>>>> Which really says more about your incessant anti-Christian crankdom than >>>>>> anything else. When Christians start regularly beheading non-Christians, >>>>>> bring it to my attention. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Nope. Not anti-Xian, anti-fundie. There's a big difference. >>>>> >>>>> There is a not insignificant chunk of the evangelical right that would >>>>> most happily impose theocracy upon America and view it as being "oppressed" >>>>> when they don't get their way in this regard. >>>>> >>>>> Although they aren't entirely harmless. The do still manage to do some >>>>> real damage, they aren't quite up to burnings yet. >>>>> >>>>> That's what Xians do to heretics. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Only atheist bigots use the term "Xian". >>> >>> Maybe Jeb is really snit :) >> >> Ever heard of Xmas? >> >> X is an just ancient abbreviation for Christ. >> How about OS X? Does it mean Apple sells OS Christ? >> Butthurt over over one of your own abbreviation. >> >> Classic false martyr complex. > > Exactly... your use of that term he refers to terms that refer back to > slavery and other atrocities toward blacks. Just insane. > > Sometimes, JED has a few strange ideas that he doesn't communicate very well to others. -- When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the bottom, and have a longer blanket."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-30 15:34 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <GN-dnecDLd77f67LnZ2dnUU7-f-dnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #329653 |
On 10/29/15 20:48, Snit wrote: > On 10/29/15, 7:36 PM, in article > 4LWdnS32U_RZSq_LnZ2dnUU7-SWdnZ2d@bresnan.com, "GreyCloud"<cumulus@mist.com> > wrote: > > ... >>>>> Maybe Jeb is really snit :) >>>> >>>> Ever heard of Xmas? >>>> >>>> X is an just ancient abbreviation for Christ. >>>> >> >> How about OS X? Does it mean Apple sells OS Christ? > > LOL! I doubt that Tim Cook would consider the idea tho. ;-)) -- When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the bottom, and have a longer blanket."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 09:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D2579E99.61F03%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #329475 |
On 10/29/15, 9:37 AM, in article ghsemjg9.ppae@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Only atheist bigots use the term "Xian". Many Chinese use the term. Do you think they are all atheist bigots? :) -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 17:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sfhufe0.aefa@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #329490 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/29/15, 9:37 AM, in article ghsemjg9.ppae@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Only atheist bigots use the term "Xian". > > Many Chinese use the term. Do you think they are all atheist bigots? > > :) > Do you make jokes about the term "nigger" as well?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 11:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D257B068.61F36%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #329503 |
On 10/29/15, 10:20 AM, in article sfhufe0.aefa@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 10/29/15, 9:37 AM, in article ghsemjg9.ppae@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Only atheist bigots use the term "Xian". >> >> Many Chinese use the term. Do you think they are all atheist bigots? >> >> :) >> > > Do you make jokes about the term "nigger" as well? > WTF? You see the word Xian as being comparable to that. THAT says a lot about you. There is nothing implying forced servitude and murder in the term "Xian"... though it is one I do not use myself. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 00:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sghak30.adfi@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #329018 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/27/15, 5:34 PM, in article fhgks83.a0f@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>>>> It's also very telling that all the clown had to talk about was a domain >>>>> name, and not his own logical fallacy. >>>>> >>>>> Oh well -- no reason to take the guy seriously. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Because of PC muz butthurt, Jabba's Palace is no more. >>>> >>>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2302312/Muslim-victory-fight-anti-Is >>>> lamic-lego-Denmark-axes-Jabbas-Palace-toy.html >>>> <quote> >>>> Muslims declare victory in fight over 'anti-Islamic' Lego as Denmark >>>> promises to axe ???Jabba???s Palace??? toy >>>> </quote> >>>> >>>> Is vallor's house in order? >>> >>> One has to wonder if there is anything the Muslims aren't offended by. >>> >> >> History's crybabies. > > Christians and Muslims are much the same. > > Both oppose a woman's right to control her body. > Both oppose birth control. > Both oppose drug legalization. > Both oppose equality for gays. > Both oppose pornography. > Both oppose pre-marital sex. > Both oppose prostitution. > Both oppose secularism. > Both support the death penalty. > Both support prayer in school. > Both support pushing their views on others. > > Etc. > > They are natural allies. One minor difference... Christian: "Convert and be saved." Muslim: "Convert or die."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-27 18:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D2556FF5.61BBA%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #329027 |
On 10/27/15, 5:59 PM, in article sghak30.adfi@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 10/27/15, 5:34 PM, in article fhgks83.a0f@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>>>>> It's also very telling that all the clown had to talk about was a domain >>>>>> name, and not his own logical fallacy. >>>>>> >>>>>> Oh well -- no reason to take the guy seriously. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Because of PC muz butthurt, Jabba's Palace is no more. >>>>> >>>>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2302312/Muslim-victory-fight-anti- >>>>> Is >>>>> lamic-lego-Denmark-axes-Jabbas-Palace-toy.html >>>>> <quote> >>>>> Muslims declare victory in fight over 'anti-Islamic' Lego as Denmark >>>>> promises to axe ???Jabba???s Palace??? toy >>>>> </quote> >>>>> >>>>> Is vallor's house in order? >>>> >>>> One has to wonder if there is anything the Muslims aren't offended by. >>>> >>> >>> History's crybabies. >> >> Christians and Muslims are much the same. >> >> Both oppose a woman's right to control her body. >> Both oppose birth control. >> Both oppose drug legalization. >> Both oppose equality for gays. >> Both oppose pornography. >> Both oppose pre-marital sex. >> Both oppose prostitution. >> Both oppose secularism. >> Both support the death penalty. >> Both support prayer in school. >> Both support pushing their views on others. >> >> Etc. >> >> They are natural allies. > > One minor difference... > Christian: "Convert and be saved." > Muslim: "Convert or die." You do not know much about Christianity! <http://jdstone.org/cr/files/converttochristianityordie.html> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_conversion#Christianity> -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-27 18:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <39d8d871-8f7e-40cb-8857-1685733110a8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #329029 |
On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 7:16:29 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 10/27/15, 5:59 PM, in article sghak30.adfi@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 10/27/15, 5:34 PM, in article fhgks83.a0f@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> > >>>>>> It's also very telling that all the clown had to talk about was a domain > >>>>>> name, and not his own logical fallacy. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Oh well -- no reason to take the guy seriously. > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Because of PC muz butthurt, Jabba's Palace is no more. > >>>>> > >>>>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2302312/Muslim-victory-fight-anti- > >>>>> Is > >>>>> lamic-lego-Denmark-axes-Jabbas-Palace-toy.html > >>>>> <quote> > >>>>> Muslims declare victory in fight over 'anti-Islamic' Lego as Denmark > >>>>> promises to axe ???Jabba???s Palace??? toy > >>>>> </quote> > >>>>> > >>>>> Is vallor's house in order? > >>>> > >>>> One has to wonder if there is anything the Muslims aren't offended by. > >>>> > >>> > >>> History's crybabies. > >> > >> Christians and Muslims are much the same. > >> > >> Both oppose a woman's right to control her body. > >> Both oppose birth control. > >> Both oppose drug legalization. > >> Both oppose equality for gays. > >> Both oppose pornography. > >> Both oppose pre-marital sex. > >> Both oppose prostitution. > >> Both oppose secularism. > >> Both support the death penalty. > >> Both support prayer in school. > >> Both support pushing their views on others. > >> > >> Etc. > >> > >> They are natural allies. > > > > One minor difference... > > Christian: "Convert and be saved." > > Muslim: "Convert or die." > > You do not know much about Christianity! > > <http://jdstone.org/cr/files/converttochristianityordie.html> > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_conversion#Christianity> He's clearly talking about *today*, you dishonest weasel: "They are natural allies" Your words, present tense.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 02:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fheuas9.jgiuae3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #329030 |
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 7:16:29 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 10/27/15, 5:59 PM, in article sghak30.adfi@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >> > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >> On 10/27/15, 5:34 PM, in article fhgks83.a0f@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>> It's also very telling that all the clown had to talk about was a domain >> >>>>>> name, and not his own logical fallacy. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Oh well -- no reason to take the guy seriously. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Because of PC muz butthurt, Jabba's Palace is no more. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2302312/Muslim-victory-fight-anti- >> >>>>> Is >> >>>>> lamic-lego-Denmark-axes-Jabbas-Palace-toy.html >> >>>>> <quote> >> >>>>> Muslims declare victory in fight over 'anti-Islamic' Lego as Denmark >> >>>>> promises to axe ???Jabba???s Palace??? toy >> >>>>> </quote> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Is vallor's house in order? >> >>>> >> >>>> One has to wonder if there is anything the Muslims aren't offended by. >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> History's crybabies. >> >> >> >> Christians and Muslims are much the same. >> >> >> >> Both oppose a woman's right to control her body. >> >> Both oppose birth control. >> >> Both oppose drug legalization. >> >> Both oppose equality for gays. >> >> Both oppose pornography. >> >> Both oppose pre-marital sex. >> >> Both oppose prostitution. >> >> Both oppose secularism. >> >> Both support the death penalty. >> >> Both support prayer in school. >> >> Both support pushing their views on others. >> >> >> >> Etc. >> >> >> >> They are natural allies. >> > >> > One minor difference... >> > Christian: "Convert and be saved." >> > Muslim: "Convert or die." >> >> You do not know much about Christianity! >> >> <http://jdstone.org/cr/files/converttochristianityordie.html> >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_conversion#Christianity> > > He's clearly talking about *today*, you dishonest weasel: > > "They are natural allies" > > Your words, present tense. Snit clearly believes that muslims should be held to the standards of the Middle Ages and earlier, since it would be ludicrous to attempt to hold them accountable by modern norms. I wonder which of Snit's personal rainbow coalition would be most likely to slay him for insulting their religion. No, actually I don't wonder. We all know the answer to that question.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-27 19:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D2557BA4.61BCB%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #329033 |
On 10/27/15, 7:01 PM, in article fheuas9.jgiuae3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 7:16:29 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>> On 10/27/15, 5:59 PM, in article sghak30.adfi@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 10/27/15, 5:34 PM, in article fhgks83.a0f@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's also very telling that all the clown had to talk about was a >>>>>>>>> domain >>>>>>>>> name, and not his own logical fallacy. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Oh well -- no reason to take the guy seriously. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Because of PC muz butthurt, Jabba's Palace is no more. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2302312/Muslim-victory-fight-an >>>>>>>> ti- >>>>>>>> Is >>>>>>>> lamic-lego-Denmark-axes-Jabbas-Palace-toy.html >>>>>>>> <quote> >>>>>>>> Muslims declare victory in fight over 'anti-Islamic' Lego as Denmark >>>>>>>> promises to axe ???Jabba???s Palace??? toy >>>>>>>> </quote> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is vallor's house in order? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> One has to wonder if there is anything the Muslims aren't offended by. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> History's crybabies. >>>>> >>>>> Christians and Muslims are much the same. >>>>> >>>>> Both oppose a woman's right to control her body. >>>>> Both oppose birth control. >>>>> Both oppose drug legalization. >>>>> Both oppose equality for gays. >>>>> Both oppose pornography. >>>>> Both oppose pre-marital sex. >>>>> Both oppose prostitution. >>>>> Both oppose secularism. >>>>> Both support the death penalty. >>>>> Both support prayer in school. >>>>> Both support pushing their views on others. >>>>> >>>>> Etc. >>>>> >>>>> They are natural allies. >>>> >>>> One minor difference... >>>> Christian: "Convert and be saved." >>>> Muslim: "Convert or die." >>> >>> You do not know much about Christianity! >>> >>> <http://jdstone.org/cr/files/converttochristianityordie.html> >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_conversion#Christianity> >> >> He's clearly talking about *today*, you dishonest weasel: >> >> "They are natural allies" >> >> Your words, present tense. > > Snit clearly believes that muslims should be held to the standards of the > Middle Ages and earlier, since it would be ludicrous to attempt to hold them > accountable by modern norms. I wonder which of Snit's personal rainbow > coalition would be most likely to slay him for insulting their religion. > No, actually I don't wonder. We all know the answer to that question. > > I believe people should be held to high standards. You and Carroll fail. Not all Muslims are the same. Not all Christians are the same. Simple facts. And the fact you are ignorant enough to not know about forced conversions to Christianity any time since the Middle Ages shows you know NOTHING of history. I mean, really, how can you not know about slavery in the US? -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-27 19:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d19e9fa8-55e6-4fbd-adf0-c6c6226dd7f1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #329034 |
On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 8:06:19 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 10/27/15, 7:01 PM, in article fheuas9.jgiuae3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > > Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 7:16:29 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>> On 10/27/15, 5:59 PM, in article sghak30.adfi@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>>> On 10/27/15, 5:34 PM, in article fhgks83.a0f@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > >>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>> It's also very telling that all the clown had to talk about was a > >>>>>>>>> domain > >>>>>>>>> name, and not his own logical fallacy. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Oh well -- no reason to take the guy seriously. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Because of PC muz butthurt, Jabba's Palace is no more. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2302312/Muslim-victory-fight-an > >>>>>>>> ti- > >>>>>>>> Is > >>>>>>>> lamic-lego-Denmark-axes-Jabbas-Palace-toy.html > >>>>>>>> <quote> > >>>>>>>> Muslims declare victory in fight over 'anti-Islamic' Lego as Denmark > >>>>>>>> promises to axe ???Jabba???s Palace??? toy > >>>>>>>> </quote> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Is vallor's house in order? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> One has to wonder if there is anything the Muslims aren't offended by. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> History's crybabies. > >>>>> > >>>>> Christians and Muslims are much the same. > >>>>> > >>>>> Both oppose a woman's right to control her body. > >>>>> Both oppose birth control. > >>>>> Both oppose drug legalization. > >>>>> Both oppose equality for gays. > >>>>> Both oppose pornography. > >>>>> Both oppose pre-marital sex. > >>>>> Both oppose prostitution. > >>>>> Both oppose secularism. > >>>>> Both support the death penalty. > >>>>> Both support prayer in school. > >>>>> Both support pushing their views on others. > >>>>> > >>>>> Etc. > >>>>> > >>>>> They are natural allies. > >>>> > >>>> One minor difference... > >>>> Christian: "Convert and be saved." > >>>> Muslim: "Convert or die." > >>> > >>> You do not know much about Christianity! > >>> > >>> <http://jdstone.org/cr/files/converttochristianityordie.html> > >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_conversion#Christianity> > >> > >> He's clearly talking about *today*, you dishonest weasel: > >> > >> "They are natural allies" > >> > >> Your words, present tense. > > > > Snit clearly believes that muslims should be held to the standards of the > > Middle Ages and earlier, since it would be ludicrous to attempt to hold them > > accountable by modern norms. I wonder which of Snit's personal rainbow > > coalition would be most likely to slay him for insulting their religion. > > No, actually I don't wonder. We all know the answer to that question. > > > > > I believe people should be held to high standards. Said the pathologically dishonest POS who keeps trying to equate modern Christians with the human garbage that is ISIS.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 02:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <shgur8w.jgi@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #329034 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/27/15, 7:01 PM, in article fheuas9.jgiuae3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 7:16:29 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> On 10/27/15, 5:59 PM, in article sghak30.adfi@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 10/27/15, 5:34 PM, in article fhgks83.a0f@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It's also very telling that all the clown had to talk about was a >>>>>>>>>> domain >>>>>>>>>> name, and not his own logical fallacy. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Oh well -- no reason to take the guy seriously. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Because of PC muz butthurt, Jabba's Palace is no more. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2302312/Muslim-victory-fight-an >>>>>>>>> ti- >>>>>>>>> Is >>>>>>>>> lamic-lego-Denmark-axes-Jabbas-Palace-toy.html >>>>>>>>> <quote> >>>>>>>>> Muslims declare victory in fight over 'anti-Islamic' Lego as Denmark >>>>>>>>> promises to axe ???Jabba???s Palace??? toy >>>>>>>>> </quote> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Is vallor's house in order? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> One has to wonder if there is anything the Muslims aren't offended by. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> History's crybabies. >>>>>> >>>>>> Christians and Muslims are much the same. >>>>>> >>>>>> Both oppose a woman's right to control her body. >>>>>> Both oppose birth control. >>>>>> Both oppose drug legalization. >>>>>> Both oppose equality for gays. >>>>>> Both oppose pornography. >>>>>> Both oppose pre-marital sex. >>>>>> Both oppose prostitution. >>>>>> Both oppose secularism. >>>>>> Both support the death penalty. >>>>>> Both support prayer in school. >>>>>> Both support pushing their views on others. >>>>>> >>>>>> Etc. >>>>>> >>>>>> They are natural allies. >>>>> >>>>> One minor difference... >>>>> Christian: "Convert and be saved." >>>>> Muslim: "Convert or die." >>>> >>>> You do not know much about Christianity! >>>> >>>> <http://jdstone.org/cr/files/converttochristianityordie.html> >>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_conversion#Christianity> >>> >>> He's clearly talking about *today*, you dishonest weasel: >>> >>> "They are natural allies" >>> >>> Your words, present tense. >> >> Snit clearly believes that muslims should be held to the standards of the >> Middle Ages and earlier, since it would be ludicrous to attempt to hold them >> accountable by modern norms. I wonder which of Snit's personal rainbow >> coalition would be most likely to slay him for insulting their religion. >> No, actually I don't wonder. We all know the answer to that question. >> >> > I believe people should be held to high standards. You and Carroll fail. Not > all Muslims are the same. Not all Christians are the same. > > Simple facts. > > And the fact you are ignorant enough to not know about forced conversions to > Christianity any time since the Middle Ages shows you know NOTHING of > history. I mean, really, how can you not know about slavery in the US? > Slaves in the US were not forced to convert to Christianity, you moron.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-27 19:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D2558583.61BDD%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #329039 |
On 10/27/15, 7:29 PM, in article shgur8w.jgi@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> Snit clearly believes that muslims should be held to the standards of the >>> Middle Ages and earlier, since it would be ludicrous to attempt to hold them >>> accountable by modern norms. I wonder which of Snit's personal rainbow >>> coalition would be most likely to slay him for insulting their religion. >>> No, actually I don't wonder. We all know the answer to that question. >>> >>> >> I believe people should be held to high standards. You and Carroll fail. Not >> all Muslims are the same. Not all Christians are the same. >> >> Simple facts. >> >> And the fact you are ignorant enough to not know about forced conversions to >> Christianity any time since the Middle Ages shows you know NOTHING of >> history. I mean, really, how can you not know about slavery in the US? >> > > Slaves in the US were not forced to convert to Christianity, you moron. <http://atlantablackstar.com/?p=236342> <https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081218095851AAXCAKl> Really, TRY to learn a little about history. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 03:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhgjxmc3.kfa0@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #329043 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/27/15, 7:29 PM, in article shgur8w.jgi@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>>> Snit clearly believes that muslims should be held to the standards of the >>>> Middle Ages and earlier, since it would be ludicrous to attempt to hold them >>>> accountable by modern norms. I wonder which of Snit's personal rainbow >>>> coalition would be most likely to slay him for insulting their religion. >>>> No, actually I don't wonder. We all know the answer to that question. >>>> >>>> >>> I believe people should be held to high standards. You and Carroll fail. Not >>> all Muslims are the same. Not all Christians are the same. >>> >>> Simple facts. >>> >>> And the fact you are ignorant enough to not know about forced conversions to >>> Christianity any time since the Middle Ages shows you know NOTHING of >>> history. I mean, really, how can you not know about slavery in the US? >>> >> >> Slaves in the US were not forced to convert to Christianity, you moron. > > <http://atlantablackstar.com/?p=236342> > <https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081218095851AAXCAKl> > > Really, TRY to learn a little about history. > How about you try reading the links you posted. Neither of them says anything about slaves in the US being forced to convert to Christianity. Maybe you are annoyed at the idea the Christian message spread by missionaries appealed to many slaves, and they embraced it. The fact is that many slave owners forbade the slaves to worship. Damn, Snit, try seeking out historical truth instead of relying whatever crap you've read on the radical left-wing blog du jour. Start here. http://www.pbs.org/wnet/slavery/experience/religion/history.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-27 20:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D255897C.61BE5%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #329046 |
On 10/27/15, 8:01 PM, in article fhgjxmc3.kfa0@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 10/27/15, 7:29 PM, in article shgur8w.jgi@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>>>> Snit clearly believes that muslims should be held to the standards of the >>>>> Middle Ages and earlier, since it would be ludicrous to attempt to hold >>>>> them >>>>> accountable by modern norms. I wonder which of Snit's personal rainbow >>>>> coalition would be most likely to slay him for insulting their religion. >>>>> No, actually I don't wonder. We all know the answer to that question. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I believe people should be held to high standards. You and Carroll fail. >>>> Not >>>> all Muslims are the same. Not all Christians are the same. >>>> >>>> Simple facts. >>>> >>>> And the fact you are ignorant enough to not know about forced conversions >>>> to >>>> Christianity any time since the Middle Ages shows you know NOTHING of >>>> history. I mean, really, how can you not know about slavery in the US? >>>> >>> >>> Slaves in the US were not forced to convert to Christianity, you moron. >> >> <http://atlantablackstar.com/?p=236342> >> <https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081218095851AAXCAKl> >> >> Really, TRY to learn a little about history. >> > > How about you try reading the links you posted. Neither of them says anything > about slaves in the US being forced to convert to Christianity. Keep in mind you are functionally illiterate. ... -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 03:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fshge8q.bmjc@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #329047 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/27/15, 8:01 PM, in article fhgjxmc3.kfa0@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 10/27/15, 7:29 PM, in article shgur8w.jgi@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>>> Snit clearly believes that muslims should be held to the standards of the >>>>>> Middle Ages and earlier, since it would be ludicrous to attempt to hold >>>>>> them >>>>>> accountable by modern norms. I wonder which of Snit's personal rainbow >>>>>> coalition would be most likely to slay him for insulting their religion. >>>>>> No, actually I don't wonder. We all know the answer to that question. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> I believe people should be held to high standards. You and Carroll fail. >>>>> Not >>>>> all Muslims are the same. Not all Christians are the same. >>>>> >>>>> Simple facts. >>>>> >>>>> And the fact you are ignorant enough to not know about forced conversions >>>>> to >>>>> Christianity any time since the Middle Ages shows you know NOTHING of >>>>> history. I mean, really, how can you not know about slavery in the US? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Slaves in the US were not forced to convert to Christianity, you moron. >>> >>> <http://atlantablackstar.com/?p=236342> >>> <https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081218095851AAXCAKl> >>> >>> Really, TRY to learn a little about history. >>> >> >> How about you try reading the links you posted. Neither of them says anything >> about slaves in the US being forced to convert to Christianity. > > Keep in mind you are functionally illiterate. > Surely you should be able to quote some reputable historian who agrees with your claim that slaves in the US were forced to convert to Christianity. No? That's what I thought.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web