Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #330042 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-31 22:00 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-11-02 13:37 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 160 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 22:00 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-01 06:21 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 09:09 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-01 17:03 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 10:12 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-01 17:32 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 10:36 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-01 17:42 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 10:57 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-01 18:05 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 11:27 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-01 18:48 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 12:12 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-01 19:20 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 12:24 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 14:54 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 13:54 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 14:38 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 13:26 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 14:36 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-01 19:42 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 13:29 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 15:37 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 13:55 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 14:30 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 12:42 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 15:06 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 13:36 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 14:24 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 12:42 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 15:08 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 13:31 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 14:22 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-01 19:39 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 13:40 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 12:43 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 15:09 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 13:38 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 15:57 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 14:09 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 07:15 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 10:40 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 08:09 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 12:27 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 10:31 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 12:49 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 11:22 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 11:30 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 10:52 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-02 19:02 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 12:06 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 11:16 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 14:50 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 13:44 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 17:41 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-02 17:43 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 18:39 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 07:51 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 09:15 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 10:48 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 10:50 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 13:54 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-02 23:10 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 00:17 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 18:44 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 19:30 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 19:57 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 20:47 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 21:50 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-02 12:44 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 12:55 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 17:41 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 14:46 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 13:49 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-02 12:56 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 13:27 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 13:06 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-03 07:42 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 06:55 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-04 23:28 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 15:53 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 19:55 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 09:19 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 12:20 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 13:38 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 10:56 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 14:42 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 15:51 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 17:12 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-04 00:31 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 19:37 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 17:46 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 18:50 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 19:36 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 00:55 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 01:08 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 01:45 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 02:09 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 02:30 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 02:45 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 03:07 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 03:54 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 05:24 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-03 04:30 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 07:45 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 09:01 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 17:52 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 19:31 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 08:51 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 09:02 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 09:25 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 19:55 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 20:49 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 21:54 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 03:03 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 03:35 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 04:42 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 17:46 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 19:26 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 08:29 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 13:35 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 14:48 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-03 12:03 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 15:21 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 15:53 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 17:14 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 17:28 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 18:34 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 18:53 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-03 13:02 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 17:08 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-03 13:41 -0600
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 08:36 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 08:49 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 09:20 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 14:17 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 09:24 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 12:30 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 13:36 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 19:36 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 14:49 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 17:09 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 16:24 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 19:55 -0600
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-03 07:13 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-03 13:02 -0600
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-02 19:53 +0000
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-02 15:21 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 13:40 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-02 12:46 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 12:51 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 17:38 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 09:59 -0800
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 10:27 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-02 18:31 +0100
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 12:48 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 11:18 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 13:38 -0500
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 11:13 -0700
Re: OT: A *truly* presidential response Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 13:37 -0500
Page 1 of 8 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-31 22:00 -0700 |
| Subject | OT: A *truly* presidential response |
| Message-ID | <D25AEA8C.623D0%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
http://www.jta.org/?p=1086888> What other candidate is willing to be this direct and honest. Amazing. For those in COLA who attack Muslims *this* is what I wish you would learn from. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-01 06:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sfhue8fa.aerf@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #330042 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > http://www.jta.org/?p=1086888> > > What other candidate is willing to be this direct and honest. Amazing. > > For those in COLA who attack Muslims *this* is what I wish you would learn > from. > Fuck Bernie Sanders and all the rest of you radical left-wing appeasers. That hunchback freak must feel right at home with the muslim rapists that are currently destroying Europe. It's ok though -- women like a good rape, right Bernie? I notice that the girl didn't seem to want to get too close to him. I don't blame her. He was a bit creepy with all that touchy-feely business. http://barbwire.com/2014/12/09/christian-children-murdered-refusing-islamic-conversion-love-jesus/ Payback is coming soon, bitches.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-01 09:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D25B8755.62413%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #330044 |
On 10/31/15, 11:21 PM, in article sfhue8fa.aerf@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> http://www.jta.org/?p=1086888> >> >> What other candidate is willing to be this direct and honest. Amazing. >> >> For those in COLA who attack Muslims *this* is what I wish you would learn >> from. >> > > Fuck Bernie Sanders and all the rest of you radical left-wing appeasers. > That hunchback freak must feel right at home with the muslim rapists > that are currently destroying Europe. It's ok though -- women like a > good rape, right Bernie? I notice that the girl didn't seem to want to > get too close to him. I don't blame her. He was a bit creepy with all > that touchy-feely business. > > http://barbwire.com/2014/12/09/christian-children-murdered-refusing-islamic-co > nversion-love-jesus/ > > Payback is coming soon, bitches. > I said I *wish* you would learn to give up your bigotry, not that I expected you to. Sanders is *exactly* right on this, and you are *exactly* wrong. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-01 17:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhsnv83.f0ae@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #330064 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/31/15, 11:21 PM, in article sfhue8fa.aerf@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> http://www.jta.org/?p=1086888> >>> >>> What other candidate is willing to be this direct and honest. Amazing. >>> >>> For those in COLA who attack Muslims *this* is what I wish you would learn >>> from. >>> >> >> Fuck Bernie Sanders and all the rest of you radical left-wing appeasers. >> That hunchback freak must feel right at home with the muslim rapists >> that are currently destroying Europe. It's ok though -- women like a >> good rape, right Bernie? I notice that the girl didn't seem to want to >> get too close to him. I don't blame her. He was a bit creepy with all >> that touchy-feely business. >> >> http://barbwire.com/2014/12/09/christian-children-murdered-refusing-islamic-co >> nversion-love-jesus/ >> >> Payback is coming soon, bitches. >> > > I said I *wish* you would learn to give up your bigotry, not that I expected > you to. Sanders is *exactly* right on this, and you are *exactly* wrong. > Prove it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-01 10:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D25B961D.6241E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #330065 |
On 11/1/15, 10:03 AM, in article fhsnv83.f0ae@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 10/31/15, 11:21 PM, in article sfhue8fa.aerf@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> http://www.jta.org/?p=1086888> >>>> >>>> What other candidate is willing to be this direct and honest. Amazing. >>>> >>>> For those in COLA who attack Muslims *this* is what I wish you would learn >>>> from. >>>> >>> >>> Fuck Bernie Sanders and all the rest of you radical left-wing appeasers. >>> That hunchback freak must feel right at home with the muslim rapists >>> that are currently destroying Europe. It's ok though -- women like a >>> good rape, right Bernie? I notice that the girl didn't seem to want to >>> get too close to him. I don't blame her. He was a bit creepy with all >>> that touchy-feely business. >>> >>> http://barbwire.com/2014/12/09/christian-children-murdered-refusing-islamic- >>> co >>> nversion-love-jesus/ >>> >>> Payback is coming soon, bitches. >>> >> >> I said I *wish* you would learn to give up your bigotry, not that I expected >> you to. Sanders is *exactly* right on this, and you are *exactly* wrong. >> > > Prove it. > To me equal rights is a starting premise that needs no proof... but we can see from around the world how scape-goating and blaming minorities in a society causes problems. Nazi Germany is a good example. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-01 17:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <seug943.gkai@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #330066 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 11/1/15, 10:03 AM, in article fhsnv83.f0ae@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 10/31/15, 11:21 PM, in article sfhue8fa.aerf@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> http://www.jta.org/?p=1086888> >>>>> >>>>> What other candidate is willing to be this direct and honest. Amazing. >>>>> >>>>> For those in COLA who attack Muslims *this* is what I wish you would learn >>>>> from. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Fuck Bernie Sanders and all the rest of you radical left-wing appeasers. >>>> That hunchback freak must feel right at home with the muslim rapists >>>> that are currently destroying Europe. It's ok though -- women like a >>>> good rape, right Bernie? I notice that the girl didn't seem to want to >>>> get too close to him. I don't blame her. He was a bit creepy with all >>>> that touchy-feely business. >>>> >>>> http://barbwire.com/2014/12/09/christian-children-murdered-refusing-islamic- >>>> co >>>> nversion-love-jesus/ >>>> >>>> Payback is coming soon, bitches. >>>> >>> >>> I said I *wish* you would learn to give up your bigotry, not that I expected >>> you to. Sanders is *exactly* right on this, and you are *exactly* wrong. >>> >> >> Prove it. >> > To me equal rights is a starting premise that needs no proof... Strawman. > but we can > see from around the world how scape-goating and blaming minorities in a > society causes problems. Pointing the blame at those responsible is not scapegoating. > Nazi Germany is a good example. > Yes, a good example of what needs to be done.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-01 10:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D25B9B9B.62427%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #330068 |
On 11/1/15, 10:32 AM, in article seug943.gkai@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 11/1/15, 10:03 AM, in article fhsnv83.f0ae@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 10/31/15, 11:21 PM, in article sfhue8fa.aerf@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> http://www.jta.org/?p=1086888> >>>>>> >>>>>> What other candidate is willing to be this direct and honest. Amazing. >>>>>> >>>>>> For those in COLA who attack Muslims *this* is what I wish you would >>>>>> learn >>>>>> from. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Fuck Bernie Sanders and all the rest of you radical left-wing appeasers. >>>>> That hunchback freak must feel right at home with the muslim rapists >>>>> that are currently destroying Europe. It's ok though -- women like a >>>>> good rape, right Bernie? I notice that the girl didn't seem to want to >>>>> get too close to him. I don't blame her. He was a bit creepy with all >>>>> that touchy-feely business. >>>>> >>>>> http://barbwire.com/2014/12/09/christian-children-murdered-refusing-islami >>>>> c- >>>>> co >>>>> nversion-love-jesus/ >>>>> >>>>> Payback is coming soon, bitches. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I said I *wish* you would learn to give up your bigotry, not that I >>>> expected >>>> you to. Sanders is *exactly* right on this, and you are *exactly* wrong. >>>> >>> >>> Prove it. >>> >> To me equal rights is a starting premise that needs no proof... > > Strawman. > >> but we can >> see from around the world how scape-goating and blaming minorities in a >> society causes problems. > > Pointing the blame at those responsible is not scapegoating. The woman in the video is, apparently, a Muslim. Explain what you know SHE has done wrong. Answer: nothing. You know NOTHING of her. You use her as a scapegoat and are doing EXACTLY what Sanders talks about. You are, sadly, proving him right. >> Nazi Germany is a good example. >> > > Yes, a good example of what needs to be done. > -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-01 17:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sdhf03.afp@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #330069 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 11/1/15, 10:32 AM, in article seug943.gkai@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 11/1/15, 10:03 AM, in article fhsnv83.f0ae@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 10/31/15, 11:21 PM, in article sfhue8fa.aerf@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> http://www.jta.org/?p=1086888> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What other candidate is willing to be this direct and honest. Amazing. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For those in COLA who attack Muslims *this* is what I wish you would >>>>>>> learn >>>>>>> from. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Fuck Bernie Sanders and all the rest of you radical left-wing appeasers. >>>>>> That hunchback freak must feel right at home with the muslim rapists >>>>>> that are currently destroying Europe. It's ok though -- women like a >>>>>> good rape, right Bernie? I notice that the girl didn't seem to want to >>>>>> get too close to him. I don't blame her. He was a bit creepy with all >>>>>> that touchy-feely business. >>>>>> >>>>>> http://barbwire.com/2014/12/09/christian-children-murdered-refusing-islami >>>>>> c- >>>>>> co >>>>>> nversion-love-jesus/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Payback is coming soon, bitches. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I said I *wish* you would learn to give up your bigotry, not that I >>>>> expected >>>>> you to. Sanders is *exactly* right on this, and you are *exactly* wrong. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Prove it. >>>> >>> To me equal rights is a starting premise that needs no proof... >> >> Strawman. >> >>> but we can >>> see from around the world how scape-goating and blaming minorities in a >>> society causes problems. >> >> Pointing the blame at those responsible is not scapegoating. > > The woman in the video is, apparently, a Muslim. Explain what you know SHE > has done wrong. > She starts out her rant describing Republican candidates as "islamophobic" and calling Ben Carson and Donald Trump "bigots." So she's a fucking liar out of the gate. > Answer: nothing. You know NOTHING of her. You use her as a scapegoat and are > doing EXACTLY what Sanders talks about. You are, sadly, proving him right. > I know I would not trust her not to blow herself up in a crowd.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-01 10:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D25BA0B2.6242C%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #330070 |
On 11/1/15, 10:42 AM, in article sdhf03.afp@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> but we can >>>> see from around the world how scape-goating and blaming minorities in a >>>> society causes problems. >>> >>> Pointing the blame at those responsible is not scapegoating. >> >> The woman in the video is, apparently, a Muslim. Explain what you know SHE >> has done wrong. >> > > She starts out her rant describing Republican candidates as "islamophobic" > and calling Ben Carson and Donald Trump "bigots." So she's a fucking liar > out of the gate. Ben Carson directly said, contrary to the no-religious-test clause, that he thinks there SHOULD be a religious test: no Muslims as president. To deny his bigotry is silly. >> Answer: nothing. You know NOTHING of her. You use her as a scapegoat and are >> doing EXACTLY what Sanders talks about. You are, sadly, proving him right. > > I know I would not trust her not to blow herself up in a crowd. Right: you are a bigot. That is the point. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-01 18:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fsheu93.f69a@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #330072 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 11/1/15, 10:42 AM, in article sdhf03.afp@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>>>> but we can >>>>> see from around the world how scape-goating and blaming minorities in a >>>>> society causes problems. >>>> >>>> Pointing the blame at those responsible is not scapegoating. >>> >>> The woman in the video is, apparently, a Muslim. Explain what you know SHE >>> has done wrong. >>> >> >> She starts out her rant describing Republican candidates as "islamophobic" >> and calling Ben Carson and Donald Trump "bigots." So she's a fucking liar >> out of the gate. > > Ben Carson directly said, contrary to the no-religious-test clause, that he > thinks there SHOULD be a religious test: no Muslims as president. To deny > his bigotry is silly. > I believe what he said was that he would personally not be comfortable with a muslim as president. Who would be? >>> Answer: nothing. You know NOTHING of her. You use her as a scapegoat and are >>> doing EXACTLY what Sanders talks about. You are, sadly, proving him right. >> >> I know I would not trust her not to blow herself up in a crowd. > > Right: you are a bigot. That is the point. > You are labeling me based on my beliefs, and somehow that makes *me* the bigot? Look in the mirror.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-01 11:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D25BA789.62437%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #330073 |
On 11/1/15, 11:05 AM, in article fsheu93.f69a@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 11/1/15, 10:42 AM, in article sdhf03.afp@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>>>>> but we can >>>>>> see from around the world how scape-goating and blaming minorities in a >>>>>> society causes problems. >>>>> >>>>> Pointing the blame at those responsible is not scapegoating. >>>> >>>> The woman in the video is, apparently, a Muslim. Explain what you know SHE >>>> has done wrong. >>>> >>> >>> She starts out her rant describing Republican candidates as "islamophobic" >>> and calling Ben Carson and Donald Trump "bigots." So she's a fucking liar >>> out of the gate. >> >> Ben Carson directly said, contrary to the no-religious-test clause, that he >> thinks there SHOULD be a religious test: no Muslims as president. To deny >> his bigotry is silly. > > I believe what he said was that he would personally not be comfortable > with a muslim as president. Who would be? No better or worse than a Christian as president. In both cases their religious "law" has no place in the nation's laws. And he did not say he would merely be uncomfortable with it, he said a Christian was fine but a Muslim was not. Absolute bigotry... and looking for special entitlements for his religion, even though both the Bible and the Qu'ran are completely inconsistent with the principles of the nation. <https://youtu.be/rC-kVUOooEA> He is completely and utterly wrong. >>>> Answer: nothing. You know NOTHING of her. You use her as a scapegoat and >>>> are doing EXACTLY what Sanders talks about. You are, sadly, proving him >>>> right. >>>> >>> I know I would not trust her not to blow herself up in a crowd. >>> >> Right: you are a bigot. That is the point. > > You are labeling me based on my beliefs, and somehow that makes *me* the > bigot? Look in the mirror. My noting your bigotry does not make you a bigot. You have the cause and effect reversed. You openly speak of your bigoted views. Look above for examples of your bigotry. It is not as if you even try to hide it. You are a bigot. Why speak of your bigoted views but deny the label? -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-01 18:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sh0faw.pe@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #330076 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 11/1/15, 11:05 AM, in article fsheu93.f69a@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 11/1/15, 10:42 AM, in article sdhf03.afp@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> but we can >>>>>>> see from around the world how scape-goating and blaming minorities in a >>>>>>> society causes problems. >>>>>> >>>>>> Pointing the blame at those responsible is not scapegoating. >>>>> >>>>> The woman in the video is, apparently, a Muslim. Explain what you know SHE >>>>> has done wrong. >>>>> >>>> >>>> She starts out her rant describing Republican candidates as "islamophobic" >>>> and calling Ben Carson and Donald Trump "bigots." So she's a fucking liar >>>> out of the gate. >>> >>> Ben Carson directly said, contrary to the no-religious-test clause, that he >>> thinks there SHOULD be a religious test: no Muslims as president. To deny >>> his bigotry is silly. >> >> I believe what he said was that he would personally not be comfortable >> with a muslim as president. Who would be? > > No better or worse than a Christian as president. In both cases their > religious "law" has no place in the nation's laws. And he did not say he > would merely be uncomfortable with it, he said a Christian was fine but a > Muslim was not. Absolute bigotry... and looking for special entitlements for > his religion, even though both the Bible and the Qu'ran are completely > inconsistent with the principles of the nation. > > <https://youtu.be/rC-kVUOooEA> > > He is completely and utterly wrong. > Cenk Uygur, Armenian Holocaust denier, has zero credibility. >>>>> Answer: nothing. You know NOTHING of her. You use her as a scapegoat and >>>>> are doing EXACTLY what Sanders talks about. You are, sadly, proving him >>>>> right. >>>>> >>>> I know I would not trust her not to blow herself up in a crowd. >>>> >>> Right: you are a bigot. That is the point. >> >> You are labeling me based on my beliefs, and somehow that makes *me* the >> bigot? Look in the mirror. > > My noting your bigotry does not make you a bigot. You have the cause and > effect reversed. You openly speak of your bigoted views. Look above for > examples of your bigotry. It is not as if you even try to hide it. You are a > bigot. Why speak of your bigoted views but deny the label? > I suppose your liberal brainwashing would likewise put you in support of mountain lions on the jogging trail.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-01 12:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D25BB218.62447%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #330077 |
On 11/1/15, 11:48 AM, in article sh0faw.pe@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 11/1/15, 11:05 AM, in article fsheu93.f69a@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 11/1/15, 10:42 AM, in article sdhf03.afp@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>> but we can see from around the world how scape-goating and blaming >>>>>>>> minorities in a society causes problems. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Pointing the blame at those responsible is not scapegoating. >>>>>>> >>>>>> The woman in the video is, apparently, a Muslim. Explain what you know >>>>>> SHE has done wrong. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> She starts out her rant describing Republican candidates as "islamophobic" >>>>> and calling Ben Carson and Donald Trump "bigots." So she's a fucking liar >>>>> out of the gate. >>>>> >>>> Ben Carson directly said, contrary to the no-religious-test clause, that he >>>> thinks there SHOULD be a religious test: no Muslims as president. To deny >>>> his bigotry is silly. >>>> >>> I believe what he said was that he would personally not be comfortable with >>> a muslim as president. Who would be? >>> >> No better or worse than a Christian as president. In both cases their >> religious "law" has no place in the nation's laws. And he did not say he >> would merely be uncomfortable with it, he said a Christian was fine but a >> Muslim was not. Absolute bigotry... and looking for special entitlements for >> his religion, even though both the Bible and the Qu'ran are completely >> inconsistent with the principles of the nation. >> >> <https://youtu.be/rC-kVUOooEA> >> >> He is completely and utterly wrong. > > Cenk Uygur, Armenian Holocaust denier, has zero credibility. So you have NO evidence to show he is wrong. Comes down to he is at least mostly right (there are some nits I can pick, but whatever). You are Carson are clearly bigots... and when your own bigoted views are pointed out you try to turn the tables. Not biting. > >>>>>> Answer: nothing. You know NOTHING of her. You use her as a scapegoat and >>>>>> are doing EXACTLY what Sanders talks about. You are, sadly, proving him >>>>>> right. >>>>>> >>>>> I know I would not trust her not to blow herself up in a crowd. >>>>> >>>> Right: you are a bigot. That is the point. >>> >>> You are labeling me based on my beliefs, and somehow that makes *me* the >>> bigot? Look in the mirror. >> >> My noting your bigotry does not make you a bigot. You have the cause and >> effect reversed. You openly speak of your bigoted views. Look above for >> examples of your bigotry. It is not as if you even try to hide it. You are a >> bigot. Why speak of your bigoted views but deny the label? >> > > I suppose your liberal brainwashing would likewise put you in support > of mountain lions on the jogging trail. Again: not biting. You insults and accusations do not in any way change the fact you are a bigot. Nor does it change the fact that we have NO evidence of the woman who talked to Sanders doing any wrong, nor any reason to think Sanders' words were anything but true and excellent. You have bigotry and special entitlements. I have a belief in equal rights and personal responsibility. We cannot find a middle ground there. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-01 19:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <shgue90a.fe@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #330087 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 11/1/15, 11:48 AM, in article sh0faw.pe@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 11/1/15, 11:05 AM, in article fsheu93.f69a@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 11/1/15, 10:42 AM, in article sdhf03.afp@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>> but we can see from around the world how scape-goating and blaming >>>>>>>>> minorities in a society causes problems. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Pointing the blame at those responsible is not scapegoating. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> The woman in the video is, apparently, a Muslim. Explain what you know >>>>>>> SHE has done wrong. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> She starts out her rant describing Republican candidates as "islamophobic" >>>>>> and calling Ben Carson and Donald Trump "bigots." So she's a fucking liar >>>>>> out of the gate. >>>>>> >>>>> Ben Carson directly said, contrary to the no-religious-test clause, that he >>>>> thinks there SHOULD be a religious test: no Muslims as president. To deny >>>>> his bigotry is silly. >>>>> >>>> I believe what he said was that he would personally not be comfortable with >>>> a muslim as president. Who would be? >>>> >>> No better or worse than a Christian as president. In both cases their >>> religious "law" has no place in the nation's laws. And he did not say he >>> would merely be uncomfortable with it, he said a Christian was fine but a >>> Muslim was not. Absolute bigotry... and looking for special entitlements for >>> his religion, even though both the Bible and the Qu'ran are completely >>> inconsistent with the principles of the nation. >>> >>> <https://youtu.be/rC-kVUOooEA> >>> >>> He is completely and utterly wrong. >> >> Cenk Uygur, Armenian Holocaust denier, has zero credibility. > > So you have NO evidence to show he is wrong. > He is a lying conspiracy theorist. > Comes down to he is at least mostly right (there are some nits I can pick, > but whatever). You are Carson are clearly bigots... and when your own > bigoted views are pointed out you try to turn the tables. Not biting. > I have no idea what he said. As soon as I saw whose vid it was, I clicked off it. I don't watch that liar. >> >>>>>>> Answer: nothing. You know NOTHING of her. You use her as a scapegoat and >>>>>>> are doing EXACTLY what Sanders talks about. You are, sadly, proving him >>>>>>> right. >>>>>>> >>>>>> I know I would not trust her not to blow herself up in a crowd. >>>>>> >>>>> Right: you are a bigot. That is the point. >>>> >>>> You are labeling me based on my beliefs, and somehow that makes *me* the >>>> bigot? Look in the mirror. >>> >>> My noting your bigotry does not make you a bigot. You have the cause and >>> effect reversed. You openly speak of your bigoted views. Look above for >>> examples of your bigotry. It is not as if you even try to hide it. You are a >>> bigot. Why speak of your bigoted views but deny the label? >>> >> >> I suppose your liberal brainwashing would likewise put you in support >> of mountain lions on the jogging trail. > > Again: not biting. So you think that mountain lions on the jogging trail are ok as long as they are not biting? How do you plan to keep them from biting? And what about their claws? Those are at least as dangerous as their teeth.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-01 12:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D25BB51B.62456%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #330094 |
On 11/1/15, 12:20 PM, in article shgue90a.fe@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: ... >> So you have NO evidence to show he is wrong. > > He is a lying conspiracy theorist. Do you deny that being an excellent description of you? >> Comes down to he is at least mostly right (there are some nits I can pick, >> but whatever). You are Carson are clearly bigots... and when your own >> bigoted views are pointed out you try to turn the tables. Not biting. > > I have no idea what he said. As soon as I saw whose vid it was, I clicked > off it. I don't watch that liar. In other words you have no counter. Fine. ... >> Again: not biting. > > So you think that mountain lions on the jogging trail are ok as long > as they are not biting? How do you plan to keep them from biting? > And what about their claws? Those are at least as dangerous as their > teeth. Again: not biting. You speak of your bigotry and how you want special entitlements. I speak of equality and personal responsibility. There is no middle ground for us. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-01 14:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n15qhe$31c$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #330076 |
On 2015-11-01 1:27 PM, Snit wrote: > On 11/1/15, 11:05 AM, in article fsheu93.f69a@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 11/1/15, 10:42 AM, in article sdhf03.afp@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> but we can >>>>>>> see from around the world how scape-goating and blaming minorities in a >>>>>>> society causes problems. >>>>>> >>>>>> Pointing the blame at those responsible is not scapegoating. >>>>> >>>>> The woman in the video is, apparently, a Muslim. Explain what you know SHE >>>>> has done wrong. >>>>> >>>> >>>> She starts out her rant describing Republican candidates as "islamophobic" >>>> and calling Ben Carson and Donald Trump "bigots." So she's a fucking liar >>>> out of the gate. >>> >>> Ben Carson directly said, contrary to the no-religious-test clause, that he >>> thinks there SHOULD be a religious test: no Muslims as president. To deny >>> his bigotry is silly. >> >> I believe what he said was that he would personally not be comfortable >> with a muslim as president. Who would be? > > No better or worse than a Christian as president. There's one line in the Holy Bible which makes a Christian a better candidate than a Muslim: Luke 6:31 - And as ye would that men should do to you, do ye also to them likewise. That fact alone makes a true Christian someone we would all benefit in having in charge. > In both cases their > religious "law" has no place in the nation's laws. It doesn't, but everyone benefits from having a grounded, moral, God-fearing individual in power. One fears that God will punish him for being a murderer, a rapist and exploiting his fellow man; the other fears that Allah will punish him for NOT murdering and raping "infidels" and exploiting them. > And he did not say he > would merely be uncomfortable with it, he said a Christian was fine but a > Muslim was not. Absolute bigotry... and looking for special entitlements for > his religion, even though both the Bible and the Qu'ran are completely > inconsistent with the principles of the nation. > > <https://youtu.be/rC-kVUOooEA> > > He is completely and utterly wrong. The laws of every Western nation, at the beginning, were inspired by the Ten Commandments of the Holy Bible and expanded upon to reflect modern reality. The laws you therefore abide to are indeed compatible with those of Christianity. As John 3:4 states: "Everyone who makes a practice of sinning also practices lawlessness; sin is lawlessness." Therefore, what is illegal is sinful and what is sinful is illegal. If you agree that murder is a crime and has no exceptions, then you agree with the Sixth Commandment. If you believe that it is immoral to cheat on your spouse, you believe in the Seventh Commandment. If you believe that it is a criminal offense to steal, you believe with the Eighth and Tenth Commandments and if you believe that lying under oath is a criminal offense, you believe in the Ninth. Muslims believe that killing is acceptable if the person is an infidel so they are automatically incompatible with the laws of this nation which only believes that adultery is not criminal (even though it should be). >>>>> Answer: nothing. You know NOTHING of her. You use her as a scapegoat and >>>>> are doing EXACTLY what Sanders talks about. You are, sadly, proving him >>>>> right. >>>>> >>>> I know I would not trust her not to blow herself up in a crowd. >>>> >>> Right: you are a bigot. That is the point. >> >> You are labeling me based on my beliefs, and somehow that makes *me* the >> bigot? Look in the mirror. > > My noting your bigotry does not make you a bigot. You have the cause and > effect reversed. You openly speak of your bigoted views. Look above for > examples of your bigotry. It is not as if you even try to hide it. You are a > bigot. Why speak of your bigoted views but deny the label? Because he is not a bigot; he simply had an opinion which varies from the norm and has good, logical reasons for doing so. Despite the fact that you fight against the herd mentality in this newsgroup, in reality you are a part of the liberal herd and like the Linux advocretins believe that anyone who thinks differently from the way you, the mainstream media and most of the country does is a bigot. If anything, it makes _you_ a bigot. -- Charmed Tuna
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-01 13:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D25BCA07.624B4%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #330117 |
On 11/1/15, 12:54 PM, in article n15qhe$31c$1@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna"
<.m@nsn.s> wrote:
...
>> No better or worse than a Christian as president.
>
> There's one line in the Holy Bible which makes a Christian a better
> candidate than a Muslim: Luke 6:31 - And as ye would that men should do
> to you, do ye also to them likewise. That fact alone makes a true
> Christian someone we would all benefit in having in charge.
Muslims ALSO have that in their holy books (they accept the Jewish and
Christian texts!)
>> In both cases their
>> religious "law" has no place in the nation's laws.
>
> It doesn't, but everyone benefits from having a grounded, moral,
> God-fearing individual in power.
Why not an atheist?
> One fears that God will punish him for
> being a murderer, a rapist and exploiting his fellow man; the other
> fears that Allah will punish him for NOT murdering and raping "infidels"
> and exploiting them.
If you need a deity to tell you not to do such things you are NOT a good
person.
>> And he did not say he
>> would merely be uncomfortable with it, he said a Christian was fine but a
>> Muslim was not. Absolute bigotry... and looking for special entitlements for
>> his religion, even though both the Bible and the Qu'ran are completely
>> inconsistent with the principles of the nation.
>>
>> <https://youtu.be/rC-kVUOooEA>
>>
>> He is completely and utterly wrong.
>
> The laws of every Western nation, at the beginning, were inspired by the
> Ten Commandments of the Holy Bible and expanded upon to reflect modern
> reality. The laws you therefore abide to are indeed compatible with
> those of Christianity.
Even the Ten Commandments are inconsistent with the Constitution.
I showed you hundreds of other passages which also are mostly incompatible
with modern views of morality.
> As John 3:4 states: "Everyone who makes a practice of sinning also practices
> lawlessness; sin is lawlessness." Therefore, what is illegal is sinful and
> what is sinful is illegal. If you agree that murder is a crime and has no
> exceptions, then you agree with the Sixth Commandment. If you believe that it
> is immoral to cheat on your spouse, you believe in the Seventh Commandment. If
> you believe that it is a criminal offense to steal, you believe with the
> Eighth and Tenth Commandments and if you believe that lying under oath is a
> criminal offense, you believe in the Ninth. Muslims believe that killing is
> acceptable if the person is an infidel so they are automatically incompatible
> with the laws of this nation which only believes that adultery is not criminal
> (even though it should be).
Again you speak of what Muslims believe as if all Muslims agree. And you
pick and select "bad" passages from Islam and "good" ones from Christianity.
Why?
>>>>>> Answer: nothing. You know NOTHING of her. You use her as a scapegoat and
>>>>>> are doing EXACTLY what Sanders talks about. You are, sadly, proving him
>>>>>> right.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I know I would not trust her not to blow herself up in a crowd.
>>>>>
>>>> Right: you are a bigot. That is the point.
>>>
>>> You are labeling me based on my beliefs, and somehow that makes *me* the
>>> bigot? Look in the mirror.
>>
>> My noting your bigotry does not make you a bigot. You have the cause and
>> effect reversed. You openly speak of your bigoted views. Look above for
>> examples of your bigotry. It is not as if you even try to hide it. You are a
>> bigot. Why speak of your bigoted views but deny the label?
>
> Because he is not a bigot; he simply had an opinion which varies from
> the norm and has good, logical reasons for doing so. Despite the fact
> that you fight against the herd mentality in this newsgroup, in reality
> you are a part of the liberal herd and like the Linux advocretins
> believe that anyone who thinks differently from the way you, the
> mainstream media and most of the country does is a bigot. If anything,
> it makes _you_ a bigot.
>
<http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bigot>
-----
a person who strongly and unfairly dislikes other people, ideas,
etc. : a bigoted person; especially : a person who hates or
refuses to accept the members of a particular group (such as a
racial or religious group)
-----
You and he are fitting this definition. I am not. As far as being a part of
some "liberal herd", which one? And what *ideas* of mine do you think are
wrong?
I was able to list a whole set of ideas the COLA herd has which are
unsupported and / or irrational. I am open to you listing such things for
me. Make a list and I will note which I believe and which I do not.
--
* OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-01 14:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n15pjc$rs3$7@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #330072 |
On 2015-11-01 12:57 PM, Snit wrote: > On 11/1/15, 10:42 AM, in article sdhf03.afp@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>>>> but we can >>>>> see from around the world how scape-goating and blaming minorities in a >>>>> society causes problems. >>>> >>>> Pointing the blame at those responsible is not scapegoating. >>> >>> The woman in the video is, apparently, a Muslim. Explain what you know SHE >>> has done wrong. >>> >> >> She starts out her rant describing Republican candidates as "islamophobic" >> and calling Ben Carson and Donald Trump "bigots." So she's a fucking liar >> out of the gate. > > Ben Carson directly said, contrary to the no-religious-test clause, that he > thinks there SHOULD be a religious test: no Muslims as president. To deny > his bigotry is silly. Considering Islam is very much incompatible with the founding fathers' principles as well as the Constitution, his belief is a good one. It doesn't make him a bigot, it makes him a Constitutionalist. >>> Answer: nothing. You know NOTHING of her. You use her as a scapegoat and are >>> doing EXACTLY what Sanders talks about. You are, sadly, proving him right. >> >> I know I would not trust her not to blow herself up in a crowd. > > Right: you are a bigot. That is the point. He's not. If anything, owl sees the world for what it is whereas you seem to see it with rose-coloured glasses. -- Charmed Tuna
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-01 13:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D25BC387.62489%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #330106 |
On 11/1/15, 12:38 PM, in article n15pjc$rs3$7@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna"
<.m@nsn.s> wrote:
> On 2015-11-01 12:57 PM, Snit wrote:
>> On 11/1/15, 10:42 AM, in article sdhf03.afp@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>>>> but we can
>>>>>> see from around the world how scape-goating and blaming minorities in a
>>>>>> society causes problems.
>>>>>
>>>>> Pointing the blame at those responsible is not scapegoating.
>>>>
>>>> The woman in the video is, apparently, a Muslim. Explain what you know SHE
>>>> has done wrong.
>>>>
>>>
>>> She starts out her rant describing Republican candidates as "islamophobic"
>>> and calling Ben Carson and Donald Trump "bigots." So she's a fucking liar
>>> out of the gate.
>>
>> Ben Carson directly said, contrary to the no-religious-test clause, that he
>> thinks there SHOULD be a religious test: no Muslims as president. To deny
>> his bigotry is silly.
>
> Considering Islam is very much incompatible with the founding fathers'
> principles as well as the Constitution, his belief is a good one. It
> doesn't make him a bigot, it makes him a Constitutionalist.
Christianity is no more compatible, if you go with what it says in the
Bible. I mean, really, look at all the passages just about intolerance:
<http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/int/long.html>. Maybe you can say some of
those are not fair or whatever, but all 700 of them. No. Not even the Qu'ran
has nearly that many:
<http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/quran/int/long.html>.
Just because the Qu'ran has "only" 537 does not mean, of course, that it is
better. Depends on how you rate each one of the hundreds of each, and those
are not the only passages showing poor morality that we can look at.
But BOTH teach horrid lessons - but many of each religion ignore those and
are still good people. Christians and Muslims *can* be good people despite
their religions. Heck, many religious groups do not even teach those things
and the religious groups can help promote morality.
>>>> Answer: nothing. You know NOTHING of her. You use her as a scapegoat and
>>>> are
>>>> doing EXACTLY what Sanders talks about. You are, sadly, proving him right.
>>>
>>> I know I would not trust her not to blow herself up in a crowd.
>>
>> Right: you are a bigot. That is the point.
>
> He's not. If anything, owl sees the world for what it is whereas you
> seem to see it with rose-coloured glasses.
<http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bigot>
-----
a person who strongly and unfairly dislikes other people, ideas,
etc. : a bigoted person; especially : a person who hates or
refuses to accept the members of a particular group (such as a
racial or religious group)
-----
When you point to a whole racial or religious group as being "bad" you are,
by definition, showing bigotry. This is esp. true when we are talking a
group with over a billion people and painting them all with the same brush.
--
* OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-01 14:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n15pge$rs3$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #330070 |
On 2015-11-01 12:42 PM, owl wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 11/1/15, 10:32 AM, in article seug943.gkai@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 11/1/15, 10:03 AM, in article fhsnv83.f0ae@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 10/31/15, 11:21 PM, in article sfhue8fa.aerf@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> http://www.jta.org/?p=1086888> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What other candidate is willing to be this direct and honest. Amazing. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For those in COLA who attack Muslims *this* is what I wish you would >>>>>>>> learn >>>>>>>> from. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Fuck Bernie Sanders and all the rest of you radical left-wing appeasers. >>>>>>> That hunchback freak must feel right at home with the muslim rapists >>>>>>> that are currently destroying Europe. It's ok though -- women like a >>>>>>> good rape, right Bernie? I notice that the girl didn't seem to want to >>>>>>> get too close to him. I don't blame her. He was a bit creepy with all >>>>>>> that touchy-feely business. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://barbwire.com/2014/12/09/christian-children-murdered-refusing-islami >>>>>>> c- >>>>>>> co >>>>>>> nversion-love-jesus/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Payback is coming soon, bitches. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I said I *wish* you would learn to give up your bigotry, not that I >>>>>> expected >>>>>> you to. Sanders is *exactly* right on this, and you are *exactly* wrong. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Prove it. >>>>> >>>> To me equal rights is a starting premise that needs no proof... >>> >>> Strawman. >>> >>>> but we can >>>> see from around the world how scape-goating and blaming minorities in a >>>> society causes problems. >>> >>> Pointing the blame at those responsible is not scapegoating. >> >> The woman in the video is, apparently, a Muslim. Explain what you know SHE >> has done wrong. >> > > She starts out her rant describing Republican candidates as "islamophobic" > and calling Ben Carson and Donald Trump "bigots." So she's a fucking liar > out of the gate. Agreed. As far as I know, Trump never made any comments on Islam or on Muslims. He targeted Mexicans and said that a good proportion of those coming over to the United States, illegally, are criminals but he was correct in saying that anyway. >> Answer: nothing. You know NOTHING of her. You use her as a scapegoat and are >> doing EXACTLY what Sanders talks about. You are, sadly, proving him right. >> > > I know I would not trust her not to blow herself up in a crowd. Until she removes her ninja outfit, I don't trust her either. -- Charmed Tuna
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 8 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web