Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #321207 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-16 17:58 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-09-25 08:40 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 262 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-16 17:58 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 05:03 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 10:36 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 10:42 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 10:58 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-24 12:34 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 10:59 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 11:12 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 11:18 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 11:23 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 11:45 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 12:06 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 12:18 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 12:28 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 13:13 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 05:03 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-18 07:55 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 08:49 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-18 08:57 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-18 16:06 +0000
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 09:19 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-18 10:02 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-18 19:10 +0200
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-18 10:27 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-18 19:49 +0200
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-18 11:31 -0700
Snit has significant issues Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-18 23:43 +0200
Re: Snit has significant issues Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-18 15:40 -0700
Re: Snit has significant issues Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-19 00:56 +0200
Re: Snit has significant issues Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-18 16:12 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 10:19 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 10:22 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 10:34 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 10:37 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-18 11:22 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 11:48 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-18 12:01 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 12:21 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-18 13:04 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 05:14 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-21 10:14 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 12:09 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 12:12 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-21 12:35 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-22 10:55 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 11:10 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-21 12:34 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-22 10:50 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 11:03 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-22 21:21 +0000
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 14:59 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 15:22 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-22 23:38 +0000
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 17:00 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-23 01:50 +0000
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 19:02 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 14:43 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-22 22:18 -0500
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-23 03:35 +0000
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 20:56 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-23 05:13 +0000
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 22:20 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-23 05:35 +0000
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 22:47 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-23 05:54 +0000
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 23:04 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-23 06:51 +0000
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 scooz <scooz@myemailisspamfree.net> - 2015-09-23 09:00 -0400
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 09:20 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-23 18:34 +0200
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 09:51 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 09:19 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-23 17:30 +0000
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 10:44 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-23 18:06 +0000
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 11:27 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-23 18:38 +0000
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 11:47 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-23 19:07 +0000
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 12:16 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 14:43 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 22:13 +0000
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 15:29 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-24 00:45 +0200
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-23 18:50 -0400
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-24 10:54 -0500
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-24 12:21 -0400
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-24 09:27 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-24 17:32 -0500
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-24 16:58 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-25 10:11 -0400
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 09:26 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 12:35 -0400
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-25 12:08 -0500
"Nobody" looking for perky balls? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 10:37 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-26 15:03 -0500
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 13:12 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-27 05:06 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 08:44 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-27 09:04 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 11:25 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-27 12:57 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-10-26 22:33 +0000
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-26 05:06 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 13:04 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-25 10:07 -0400
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-26 14:55 -0500
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 13:14 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-26 18:50 -0400
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-26 21:38 -0500
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-27 07:59 -0400
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-27 16:13 -0600
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-26 14:58 -0500
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 13:13 -0700
More FUD. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-26 17:11 -0600
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-26 20:14 -0400
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-26 20:57 -0400
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-26 21:42 -0500
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 20:33 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 19:14 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 23:15 -0400
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 16:33 +0000
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-10-24 19:12 +0100
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-25 11:50 -0500
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-23 19:28 -0400
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 20:56 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 22:53 +0000
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 21:01 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-24 18:15 +0000
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-24 12:20 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-24 23:12 +0000
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-24 16:51 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 00:03 +0000
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-24 17:10 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 00:20 +0000
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-24 17:45 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-26 05:23 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 08:40 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-26 10:12 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-26 13:21 -0400
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-26 11:01 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-23 07:32 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-23 18:26 +0200
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 09:39 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-23 10:07 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 10:37 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-23 10:59 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 11:28 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-23 11:38 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-23 18:45 +0000
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 11:48 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2015-09-24 15:54 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-23 11:48 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 11:55 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-23 12:02 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 12:13 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 11:53 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-23 12:00 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 12:13 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 09:45 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-22 21:15 -0500
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 19:23 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 19:30 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-09-23 04:53 +0200
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-09-23 05:03 +0200
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-23 03:31 +0000
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-09-23 05:46 +0200
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-23 04:50 +0000
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-23 09:58 -0400
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 09:27 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-23 12:36 -0400
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 09:53 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-23 10:12 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 10:35 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-23 11:03 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 11:28 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-23 11:39 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 11:50 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-23 11:54 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 12:03 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-23 12:09 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 12:16 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-23 12:23 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 12:30 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-24 04:54 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-24 09:20 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-24 09:32 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-24 09:39 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-24 11:46 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-24 12:07 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-24 12:28 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-24 13:00 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-25 04:39 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-25 08:40 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2015-09-24 11:06 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-24 12:47 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-24 12:59 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-24 15:45 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-25 09:33 -0400
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-25 08:43 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-25 10:02 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-25 10:18 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2015-09-24 15:53 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-23 12:03 -0600
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 11:29 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-22 10:58 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 11:09 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-22 11:38 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 12:06 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-22 12:59 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 13:17 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-23 07:31 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 09:11 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 11:57 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-18 13:05 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 05:20 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-21 10:04 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-21 20:45 +0200
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-21 11:48 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-21 21:03 +0200
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-21 12:17 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-21 22:39 +0200
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-21 13:42 -0700
Not just thing has significant issues... look at ccretin chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-21 14:14 -0500
Re: Not just thing has significant issues... look at ccretin Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-21 12:35 -0700
Turdv has never been credbile. You're a Troll, Turdv. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-21 14:54 -0600
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 12:01 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-21 12:16 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-18 09:57 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-18 19:02 +0200
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-18 10:28 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-21 16:47 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-22 09:42 +0200
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 06:29 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-22 20:37 +0200
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 scooz <scooz@myemailisspamfree.net> - 2015-09-18 13:38 -0400
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-18 11:15 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-24 12:50 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2015-09-17 14:47 -0500
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 13:13 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 20:32 +0000
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 13:36 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 20:38 +0000
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 14:27 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 scooz <scooz@myemailisspamfree.net> - 2015-09-17 18:54 -0400
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 16:06 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 11:34 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 11:41 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 11:46 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 12:09 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 12:18 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-24 12:47 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-24 12:46 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-24 12:40 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-24 12:40 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-24 12:19 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-24 12:33 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-24 12:43 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-24 12:51 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-24 13:06 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-25 04:47 -0700
Re: Not just Linux has significant UI issues... a first look at Windows 10 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-25 08:40 -0700
Page 4 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 14 Next page →
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-23 05:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fdsa0ae.kig@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #322202 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 9/22/15, 8:35 PM, in article fad3fa3.ef@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> Gee, Notepad had that limit on Windows 95 and 98 but not since. LOL! >>>> >>>> Still good to go with a 215MB file. >>>> >>>> https://vid.me/9wA1 >>>> >>>> It goes into a "Not Responding" state for a while and takes an unreasonable >>>> amount of time to load, but it works eventually. It also allocates nearly >>>> 500MB for whatever reason. >> >>> According to this site: >>> http://www.gn.apc.org/support/understanding-file-sizes >> >>> 25MB is enough to hold the "approximate size of the 26-volume 1911 >>> edition of Encyclopaedia Britannica." >> >>> Why the hell would I need my WP to open a file nine times the size of >>> the entire Encyclopaedia Britannica? >> >> Why wouldn't you? > Because except for some edge cases there is absolutely no need for the > general user. So you are the arbiter of what everyone needs/wants in their editor of choice? > For huge logs and the like there may be occasional use for system > administrators, etc. You can edit binary files with vim. It is not uncommon for binary files to be huge.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-22 22:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D22784C7.5CC6A%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #322221 |
On 9/22/15, 10:13 PM, in article fdsa0ae.kig@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> Why the hell would I need my WP to open a file nine times the size of >>>> the entire Encyclopaedia Britannica? >>> >>> Why wouldn't you? > >> Because except for some edge cases there is absolutely no need for the >> general user. > > So you are the arbiter of what everyone needs/wants in their editor > of choice? Non sequitur insults do not impress. >> For huge logs and the like there may be occasional use for system >> administrators, etc. > > You can edit binary files with vim. It is not uncommon for binary > files to be huge. Not in contention. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-23 05:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <feal3.f02@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #322224 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 9/22/15, 10:13 PM, in article fdsa0ae.kig@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> Why the hell would I need my WP to open a file nine times the size of >>>>> the entire Encyclopaedia Britannica? >>>> >>>> Why wouldn't you? >> >>> Because except for some edge cases there is absolutely no need for the >>> general user. >> >> So you are the arbiter of what everyone needs/wants in their editor >> of choice? > Non sequitur insults do not impress. Neither does imagining non-existent non sequiturs. >>> For huge logs and the like there may be occasional use for system >>> administrators, etc. >> >> You can edit binary files with vim. It is not uncommon for binary >> files to be huge. > Not in contention. So did you have a point to make at all?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-22 22:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D2278AEA.5CC77%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #322232 |
On 9/22/15, 10:35 PM, in article feal3.f02@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 9/22/15, 10:13 PM, in article fdsa0ae.kig@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>>>>> Why the hell would I need my WP to open a file nine times the size of >>>>>> the entire Encyclopaedia Britannica? >>>>> >>>>> Why wouldn't you? >>> >>>> Because except for some edge cases there is absolutely no need for the >>>> general user. >>> >>> So you are the arbiter of what everyone needs/wants in their editor >>> of choice? > >> Non sequitur insults do not impress. > > Neither does imagining non-existent non sequiturs. > >>>> For huge logs and the like there may be occasional use for system >>>> administrators, etc. >>> >>> You can edit binary files with vim. It is not uncommon for binary >>> files to be huge. > >> Not in contention. > > So did you have a point to make at all? > Yes, the one I made above. And then you changed topics away from technology to... me... or, really, your fantasies of me. First you note how you are uncomfortable with your own homosexual tendencies then you start publicly fantasizing about me. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-23 05:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sad9.fao3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #322235 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 9/22/15, 10:35 PM, in article feal3.f02@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 9/22/15, 10:13 PM, in article fdsa0ae.kig@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>>>>>> Why the hell would I need my WP to open a file nine times the size of >>>>>>> the entire Encyclopaedia Britannica? >>>>>> >>>>>> Why wouldn't you? >>>> >>>>> Because except for some edge cases there is absolutely no need for the >>>>> general user. >>>> >>>> So you are the arbiter of what everyone needs/wants in their editor >>>> of choice? >> >>> Non sequitur insults do not impress. >> >> Neither does imagining non-existent non sequiturs. >> >>>>> For huge logs and the like there may be occasional use for system >>>>> administrators, etc. >>>> >>>> You can edit binary files with vim. It is not uncommon for binary >>>> files to be huge. >> >>> Not in contention. >> >> So did you have a point to make at all? >> > Yes, the one I made above. What point was that? The one where you made a proclamation about what the general user needs in an editor, and then tried to hide behind the "non sequitur" smoke screen when called out on it? > And then you changed topics away from technology > to... me... or, really, your fantasies of me. It was you who changed the topic from technology to sociology. > First you note how you are uncomfortable with your own homosexual tendencies > then you start publicly fantasizing about me. So you're taking drugs tonight. OK. Party on then.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-22 23:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D2278EE7.5CC7D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #322236 |
On 9/22/15, 10:54 PM, in article sad9.fao3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 9/22/15, 10:35 PM, in article feal3.f02@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 9/22/15, 10:13 PM, in article fdsa0ae.kig@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>> Why the hell would I need my WP to open a file nine times the size of >>>>>>>> the entire Encyclopaedia Britannica? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why wouldn't you? >>>>> >>>>>> Because except for some edge cases there is absolutely no need for the >>>>>> general user. >>>>> >>>>> So you are the arbiter of what everyone needs/wants in their editor >>>>> of choice? >>> >>>> Non sequitur insults do not impress. >>> >>> Neither does imagining non-existent non sequiturs. >>> >>>>>> For huge logs and the like there may be occasional use for system >>>>>> administrators, etc. >>>>> >>>>> You can edit binary files with vim. It is not uncommon for binary >>>>> files to be huge. >>> >>>> Not in contention. >>> >>> So did you have a point to make at all? >>> >> Yes, the one I made above. > > What point was that? The one where you made a proclamation about what > the general user needs in an editor, and then tried to hide behind the > "non sequitur" smoke screen when called out on it? The one where you asked a question, I answered, and then you responded with fantasizes about me. Now can you actually get back to the topic of technology and PLEASE stop talking about your fantasizes of me. >> And then you changed topics away from technology >> to... me... or, really, your fantasies of me. > > It was you who changed the topic from technology to sociology. > >> First you note how you are uncomfortable with your own homosexual tendencies >> then you start publicly fantasizing about me. > > So you're taking drugs tonight. OK. Party on then. And you share MORE of your fantasizes about me. Please: try to talk about technology. Here, to help you: You asked why Notepad, a low end consumer focused text tool, would not handle huge files that most people would never encounter or use... and those that would, as even you note, would be more likely to use an actual feature-rich text editor such as vim. I noted that the developers likely would not take much time to make sure it can handle such files because the use-cases of such would be rare: the general user would have no need or desire for such a tool, not that it doing so would harm them in any way and I certainly would not be against it working with such files. Got it... or are you too busy dealing with your discomfort of your homosexual feelings and your fantasizes about me? -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-23 06:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <serf.df9@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #322239 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 9/22/15, 10:54 PM, in article sad9.fao3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 9/22/15, 10:35 PM, in article feal3.f02@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 9/22/15, 10:13 PM, in article fdsa0ae.kig@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>> Why the hell would I need my WP to open a file nine times the size of >>>>>>>>> the entire Encyclopaedia Britannica? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why wouldn't you? >>>>>> >>>>>>> Because except for some edge cases there is absolutely no need for the >>>>>>> general user. >>>>>> >>>>>> So you are the arbiter of what everyone needs/wants in their editor >>>>>> of choice? >>>> >>>>> Non sequitur insults do not impress. >>>> >>>> Neither does imagining non-existent non sequiturs. >>>> >>>>>>> For huge logs and the like there may be occasional use for system >>>>>>> administrators, etc. >>>>>> >>>>>> You can edit binary files with vim. It is not uncommon for binary >>>>>> files to be huge. >>>> >>>>> Not in contention. >>>> >>>> So did you have a point to make at all? >>>> >>> Yes, the one I made above. >> >> What point was that? The one where you made a proclamation about what >> the general user needs in an editor, and then tried to hide behind the >> "non sequitur" smoke screen when called out on it? > The one where you asked a question, I answered, and then you responded with > fantasizes about me. > Now can you actually get back to the topic of technology and PLEASE stop > talking about your fantasizes of me. >>> And then you changed topics away from technology >>> to... me... or, really, your fantasies of me. >> >> It was you who changed the topic from technology to sociology. >> >>> First you note how you are uncomfortable with your own homosexual tendencies >>> then you start publicly fantasizing about me. >> >> So you're taking drugs tonight. OK. Party on then. > And you share MORE of your fantasizes about me. Please: try to talk about > technology. Here, to help you: > You asked why Notepad, a low end consumer focused text tool, would not > handle huge files that most people would never encounter or use... and those > that would, as even you note, would be more likely to use an actual > feature-rich text editor such as vim. I guess since you are drowning in froth you failed to notice that notepad actually *does* handle files of that size. Just not very efficiently. > I noted that the developers likely would not take much time to make sure it > can handle such files What makes you think that any effort is required to "make sure it can handle such files"? In less than 30 lines of code, including error checking, you can have an app that can open (instantly) a file of arbitrary size and write to an arbitrary position in that file without even allocating memory. > because the use-cases of such would be rare: the > general user would have no need or desire for such a tool, not that it doing > so would harm them in any way and I certainly would not be against it > working with such files. You wouldn't be against it. That's the important thing, right? Snit's approval? LOL. > Got it... or are you too busy dealing with your discomfort of your > homosexual feelings and your fantasizes about me? You're all gay'ed up tonight aren't you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | scooz <scooz@myemailisspamfree.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-23 09:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <8o79fsn7k9d0.l4ocnrmyw26x.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #322245 |
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 06:51:10 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 9/22/15, 10:54 PM, in article sad9.fao3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 9/22/15, 10:35 PM, in article feal3.f02@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 9/22/15, 10:13 PM, in article fdsa0ae.kig@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Why the hell would I need my WP to open a file nine times the size of >>>>>>>>>> the entire Encyclopaedia Britannica? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why wouldn't you? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Because except for some edge cases there is absolutely no need for the >>>>>>>> general user. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So you are the arbiter of what everyone needs/wants in their editor >>>>>>> of choice? >>>>> >>>>>> Non sequitur insults do not impress. >>>>> >>>>> Neither does imagining non-existent non sequiturs. >>>>> >>>>>>>> For huge logs and the like there may be occasional use for system >>>>>>>> administrators, etc. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can edit binary files with vim. It is not uncommon for binary >>>>>>> files to be huge. >>>>> >>>>>> Not in contention. >>>>> >>>>> So did you have a point to make at all? >>>>> >>>> Yes, the one I made above. >>> >>> What point was that? The one where you made a proclamation about what >>> the general user needs in an editor, and then tried to hide behind the >>> "non sequitur" smoke screen when called out on it? > >> The one where you asked a question, I answered, and then you responded with >> fantasizes about me. > >> Now can you actually get back to the topic of technology and PLEASE stop >> talking about your fantasizes of me. > >>>> And then you changed topics away from technology >>>> to... me... or, really, your fantasies of me. >>> >>> It was you who changed the topic from technology to sociology. >>> >>>> First you note how you are uncomfortable with your own homosexual tendencies >>>> then you start publicly fantasizing about me. >>> >>> So you're taking drugs tonight. OK. Party on then. > >> And you share MORE of your fantasizes about me. Please: try to talk about >> technology. Here, to help you: > >> You asked why Notepad, a low end consumer focused text tool, would not >> handle huge files that most people would never encounter or use... and those >> that would, as even you note, would be more likely to use an actual >> feature-rich text editor such as vim. > > I guess since you are drowning in froth you failed to notice that > notepad actually *does* handle files of that size. Just not very > efficiently. > >> I noted that the developers likely would not take much time to make sure it >> can handle such files > > What makes you think that any effort is required to "make sure it can > handle such files"? In less than 30 lines of code, including error > checking, you can have an app that can open (instantly) a file of > arbitrary size and write to an arbitrary position in that file without > even allocating memory. > >> because the use-cases of such would be rare: the >> general user would have no need or desire for such a tool, not that it doing >> so would harm them in any way and I certainly would not be against it >> working with such files. > > You wouldn't be against it. That's the important thing, right? > Snit's approval? LOL. > >> Got it... or are you too busy dealing with your discomfort of your >> homosexual feelings and your fantasizes about me? > > You're all gay'ed up tonight aren't you. After getting caught posting as Joel Crump in the Windows 10 group, snit's been hitting the glue big time. It's all the same routine with him. It's called projection and he uses it to diffuse his own insecurities. Statements like "you are fantasizing about me" or "your fear of homosexuality" are techniques he uses for projecting his own insecurities on others in order to shut down the conversation that where he is currently losing the argument. He must have gone sky high on glue last night. At least based upon his massive meltdown.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-23 09:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D2281F4B.5CD25%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #322263 |
On 9/23/15, 6:00 AM, in article 8o79fsn7k9d0.l4ocnrmyw26x.dlg@40tude.net, "scooz" <scooz@myemailisspamfree.net> wrote: > On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 06:51:10 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 9/22/15, 10:54 PM, in article sad9.fao3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 9/22/15, 10:35 PM, in article feal3.f02@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 9/22/15, 10:13 PM, in article fdsa0ae.kig@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Why the hell would I need my WP to open a file nine times the size >>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>> the entire Encyclopaedia Britannica? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Why wouldn't you? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Because except for some edge cases there is absolutely no need for the >>>>>>>>> general user. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So you are the arbiter of what everyone needs/wants in their editor >>>>>>>> of choice? >>>>>> >>>>>>> Non sequitur insults do not impress. >>>>>> >>>>>> Neither does imagining non-existent non sequiturs. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For huge logs and the like there may be occasional use for system >>>>>>>>> administrators, etc. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You can edit binary files with vim. It is not uncommon for binary >>>>>>>> files to be huge. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Not in contention. >>>>>> >>>>>> So did you have a point to make at all? >>>>>> >>>>> Yes, the one I made above. >>>> >>>> What point was that? The one where you made a proclamation about what >>>> the general user needs in an editor, and then tried to hide behind the >>>> "non sequitur" smoke screen when called out on it? >> >>> The one where you asked a question, I answered, and then you responded with >>> fantasizes about me. >> >>> Now can you actually get back to the topic of technology and PLEASE stop >>> talking about your fantasizes of me. >> >>>>> And then you changed topics away from technology >>>>> to... me... or, really, your fantasies of me. >>>> >>>> It was you who changed the topic from technology to sociology. >>>> >>>>> First you note how you are uncomfortable with your own homosexual >>>>> tendencies >>>>> then you start publicly fantasizing about me. >>>> >>>> So you're taking drugs tonight. OK. Party on then. >> >>> And you share MORE of your fantasizes about me. Please: try to talk about >>> technology. Here, to help you: >> >>> You asked why Notepad, a low end consumer focused text tool, would not >>> handle huge files that most people would never encounter or use... and those >>> that would, as even you note, would be more likely to use an actual >>> feature-rich text editor such as vim. >> >> I guess since you are drowning in froth you failed to notice that >> notepad actually *does* handle files of that size. Just not very >> efficiently. >> >>> I noted that the developers likely would not take much time to make sure it >>> can handle such files >> >> What makes you think that any effort is required to "make sure it can >> handle such files"? In less than 30 lines of code, including error >> checking, you can have an app that can open (instantly) a file of >> arbitrary size and write to an arbitrary position in that file without >> even allocating memory. >> >>> because the use-cases of such would be rare: the >>> general user would have no need or desire for such a tool, not that it doing >>> so would harm them in any way and I certainly would not be against it >>> working with such files. >> >> You wouldn't be against it. That's the important thing, right? >> Snit's approval? LOL. >> >>> Got it... or are you too busy dealing with your discomfort of your >>> homosexual feelings and your fantasizes about me? >> >> You're all gay'ed up tonight aren't you. > > After getting caught posting as Joel Crump in the Windows 10 group, > snit's been hitting the glue big time. > It's all the same routine with him. > It's called projection and he uses it to diffuse his own > insecurities. > Statements like "you are fantasizing about me" or "your fear of > homosexuality" are techniques he uses for projecting his own > insecurities on others in order to shut down the conversation that > where he is currently losing the argument. > > He must have gone sky high on glue last night. At least based upon > his massive meltdown. What the hell are you even babbling about? -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-23 18:34 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mtuk7t$ekb$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #322301 |
Snit wrote: >> >> After getting caught posting as Joel Crump in the Windows 10 group, >> snit's been hitting the glue big time. >> It's all the same routine with him. >> It's called projection and he uses it to diffuse his own >> insecurities. >> Statements like "you are fantasizing about me" or "your fear of >> homosexuality" are techniques he uses for projecting his own >> insecurities on others in order to shut down the conversation that >> where he is currently losing the argument. >> >> He must have gone sky high on glue last night. At least based upon >> his massive meltdown. > > What the hell are you even babbling about? > > Your continuous use of socks,, naturally. And your constant lies. Which according to a single person (you) are not real. Now that is a little difficult: Who should be believed? You, a liar and usenet kook or anybody else. Choices...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-23 09:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D22826BC.5CD69%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #322310 |
On 9/23/15, 9:34 AM, in article mtuk7t$ekb$3@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > Snit wrote: > >>> >>> After getting caught posting as Joel Crump in the Windows 10 group, >>> snit's been hitting the glue big time. >>> It's all the same routine with him. >>> It's called projection and he uses it to diffuse his own >>> insecurities. >>> Statements like "you are fantasizing about me" or "your fear of >>> homosexuality" are techniques he uses for projecting his own >>> insecurities on others in order to shut down the conversation that >>> where he is currently losing the argument. >>> >>> He must have gone sky high on glue last night. At least based upon >>> his massive meltdown. >> >> What the hell are you even babbling about? >> >> > > Your continuous use of socks,, naturally. And your constant lies. > > Which according to a single person (you) are not real. > > Now that is a little difficult: Who should be believed? You, a liar and > usenet kook or anybody else. Choices... Everyone is Snit. Snit tells unquotable lies. Come up with new material, Peter! -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-23 09:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D2281F21.5CD24%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #322245 |
On 9/22/15, 11:51 PM, in article serf.df9@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: ... >>> So you're taking drugs tonight. OK. Party on then. > >> And you share MORE of your fantasizes about me. Please: try to talk about >> technology. Here, to help you: > >> You asked why Notepad, a low end consumer focused text tool, would not >> handle huge files that most people would never encounter or use... and those >> that would, as even you note, would be more likely to use an actual >> feature-rich text editor such as vim. > > I guess since you are drowning in froth you failed to notice that > notepad actually *does* handle files of that size. Just not very > efficiently. Turn of word wrap and it opens then much faster. I played the other day and for a file at 2.02 GB it just says it cannot handle it. But with these larger files people generally open them because they want to do text processing... something Notepad does poorly. For file such as that people are much more likely to use vim. I noted this and you just continued to fantasize about ME and shared your fantasizes. I find that creepy and weird. Please focus on technology. >> I noted that the developers likely would not take much time to make sure it >> can handle such files > > What makes you think that any effort is required to "make sure it can > handle such files"? In less than 30 lines of code, including error > checking, you can have an app that can open (instantly) a file of > arbitrary size and write to an arbitrary position in that file without > even allocating memory. So show such a program: one that has the features of Notepad but can do as you say. >> because the use-cases of such would be rare: the >> general user would have no need or desire for such a tool, not that it doing >> so would harm them in any way and I certainly would not be against it >> working with such files. > > You wouldn't be against it. That's the important thing, right? > Snit's approval? LOL. Again: NOT interested in your fantasizes about me. >> Got it... or are you too busy dealing with your discomfort of your >> homosexual feelings and your fantasizes about me? > > You're all gay'ed up tonight aren't you. You are the one fantasizing about ME... and doing so right after you displayed what is almost surely discomfort at your own homosexual tendencies. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-23 17:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fdsa.9r3qrf@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #322299 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 9/22/15, 11:51 PM, in article serf.df9@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> I noted that the developers likely would not take much time to make sure it >>> can handle such files >> >> What makes you think that any effort is required to "make sure it can >> handle such files"? In less than 30 lines of code, including error >> checking, you can have an app that can open (instantly) a file of >> arbitrary size and write to an arbitrary position in that file without >> even allocating memory. > So show such a program: one that has the features of Notepad but can do as > you say. It only needs the features I described in order to be "such a program."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-23 10:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D22832F8.5CD98%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #322332 |
On 9/23/15, 10:30 AM, in article fdsa.9r3qrf@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 9/22/15, 11:51 PM, in article serf.df9@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > >>>> I noted that the developers likely would not take much time to make sure it >>>> can handle such files >>> >>> What makes you think that any effort is required to "make sure it can >>> handle such files"? In less than 30 lines of code, including error >>> checking, you can have an app that can open (instantly) a file of >>> arbitrary size and write to an arbitrary position in that file without >>> even allocating memory. > >> So show such a program: one that has the features of Notepad but can do as >> you say. > > It only needs the features I described in order to be "such a program." > Ah, so you moved goal posts again. OK. When you do that you should be more open about it. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-23 18:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fsad.k933@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #322339 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 9/23/15, 10:30 AM, in article fdsa.9r3qrf@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 9/22/15, 11:51 PM, in article serf.df9@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >> >>>>> I noted that the developers likely would not take much time to make sure it >>>>> can handle such files >>>> >>>> What makes you think that any effort is required to "make sure it can >>>> handle such files"? In less than 30 lines of code, including error >>>> checking, you can have an app that can open (instantly) a file of >>>> arbitrary size and write to an arbitrary position in that file without >>>> even allocating memory. >> >>> So show such a program: one that has the features of Notepad but can do as >>> you say. >> >> It only needs the features I described in order to be "such a program." >> > Ah, so you moved goal posts again. OK. When you do that you should be more > open about it. *You* are moving the goal posts. I described a program. You challenged me to show "such a program" but with the added caveat that it have the "features of Notepad." This is another sign of your ignorance, thinking that any of the "features of Notepad," other than its ability to open and write to files, is relevant to its ability to open and write to *huge* files, and you show no understanding of this "effort" that you claimed the "developers" decided was not warranted in a program designed for "general users." $ ls -l nptest.txt -rw-r--r-- 1 owl owl 459703367 2015-09-23 14:00 nptest.txt $ ./loo usage: ./loo <filename> <byte offset> $ date; ./loo nptest.txt 100000000; date Wed Sep 23 14:01:23 EDT 2015 At byte offset 100000000 Write some stuff... hit <Ctrl> D to close... BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH closing "nptest.txt" Wed Sep 23 14:01:30 EDT 2015 $ grep -A 3 -B 3 BLAH nptest.txt line 7777775 line 7777776 line 7777777 linBLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH ne 7777780 line 7777781 line 7777782 line 7777783 $ wc -l loo.c 23 loo.c $
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-23 11:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D2283D11.5CDD4%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #322344 |
On 9/23/15, 11:06 AM, in article fsad.k933@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 9/23/15, 10:30 AM, in article fdsa.9r3qrf@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 9/22/15, 11:51 PM, in article serf.df9@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>> I noted that the developers likely would not take much time to make sure >>>>>> it >>>>>> can handle such files >>>>> >>>>> What makes you think that any effort is required to "make sure it can >>>>> handle such files"? In less than 30 lines of code, including error >>>>> checking, you can have an app that can open (instantly) a file of >>>>> arbitrary size and write to an arbitrary position in that file without >>>>> even allocating memory. >>> >>>> So show such a program: one that has the features of Notepad but can do as >>>> you say. >>> >>> It only needs the features I described in order to be "such a program." >>> >> Ah, so you moved goal posts again. OK. When you do that you should be more >> open about it. > > *You* are moving the goal posts. Ah, I forced you to change the topic to what NOTEPAD should be able to do to what you think some completely different program could do. Not buying it. > I described a program. You challenged me to show "such a program" but with > the added caveat that it have the "features of Notepad." Evil that I wanted you to stay on topic. Man, how can you handle it? > This is another sign of your ignorance, thinking that any of the "features of > Notepad," other than its ability to open and write to files, is relevant to > its ability to open and write to *huge* files, and you show no understanding > of this "effort" that you claimed the "developers" decided was not warranted > in a program designed for "general users." > So I talked about Notepad and you noted a program which was not like Notepad could do what Notepad cannot, or at least cannot do well. Then you went off topic and whined about me. LOL! ... -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-23 18:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fdsdli93.aef3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #322359 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 9/23/15, 11:06 AM, in article fsad.k933@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 9/23/15, 10:30 AM, in article fdsa.9r3qrf@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 9/22/15, 11:51 PM, in article serf.df9@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>>> I noted that the developers likely would not take much time to make sure >>>>>>> it >>>>>>> can handle such files >>>>>> >>>>>> What makes you think that any effort is required to "make sure it can >>>>>> handle such files"? In less than 30 lines of code, including error >>>>>> checking, you can have an app that can open (instantly) a file of >>>>>> arbitrary size and write to an arbitrary position in that file without >>>>>> even allocating memory. >>>> >>>>> So show such a program: one that has the features of Notepad but can do as >>>>> you say. >>>> >>>> It only needs the features I described in order to be "such a program." >>>> >>> Ah, so you moved goal posts again. OK. When you do that you should be more >>> open about it. >> >> *You* are moving the goal posts. > Ah, I forced you to change the topic to what NOTEPAD should be able to do to > what you think some completely different program could do. A completely different program that does easily what notepad does poorly, namely opening and editing huge files. > Not buying it. Because you have no clue how programs work with files. >> I described a program. You challenged me to show "such a program" but with >> the added caveat that it have the "features of Notepad." > Evil that I wanted you to stay on topic. Man, how can you handle it? The topic is opening and editing huge files. Try to keep up. >> This is another sign of your ignorance, thinking that any of the "features of >> Notepad," other than its ability to open and write to files, is relevant to >> its ability to open and write to *huge* files, and you show no understanding >> of this "effort" that you claimed the "developers" decided was not warranted >> in a program designed for "general users." >> > So I talked about Notepad and you noted a program which was not like Notepad > could do what Notepad cannot, or at least cannot do well. Notepad opens and edits files. This one opens and edits files. > Then you went off topic and whined about me. > LOL! So you don't understand how programs work with files. Got it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-23 11:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D22841C8.5CE08%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #322374 |
On 9/23/15, 11:38 AM, in article fdsdli93.aef3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: ... >>> *You* are moving the goal posts. > >> Ah, I forced you to change the topic to what NOTEPAD should be able to do to >> what you think some completely different program could do. > > A completely different program that does easily what notepad does poorly, > namely opening and editing huge files. Yes, there are programs that are not Notepad that have different pros and cons. But why are you moving the goal post to this completely off topic idea which is not in contention? Wait: you answer this below! >> Not buying it. > > Because you have no clue how programs work with files. Oh, you moved goal posts to help with you making up stories about ME. You wanted to talk about ME again and not technology. Your obsession with me is not flattering. ... -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-23 19:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <feso93.f830@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #322380 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 9/23/15, 11:38 AM, in article fdsdli93.aef3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > ... >>>> *You* are moving the goal posts. >> >>> Ah, I forced you to change the topic to what NOTEPAD should be able to do to >>> what you think some completely different program could do. >> >> A completely different program that does easily what notepad does poorly, >> namely opening and editing huge files. > Yes, there are programs that are not Notepad that have different pros and > cons. But why are you moving the goal post to this completely off topic idea > which is not in contention? > Wait: you answer this below! >>> Not buying it. >> >> Because you have no clue how programs work with files. > Oh, you moved goal posts to help with you making up stories about ME. You > wanted to talk about ME again and not technology. > Your obsession with me is not flattering. 30 day plonk. Wed Sep 23 15:05:48 EDT 2015
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-23 12:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D22848B7.5CE34%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #322393 |
On 9/23/15, 12:07 PM, in article feso93.f830@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 9/23/15, 11:38 AM, in article fdsdli93.aef3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> ... >>>>> *You* are moving the goal posts. >>> >>>> Ah, I forced you to change the topic to what NOTEPAD should be able to do >>>> to >>>> what you think some completely different program could do. >>> >>> A completely different program that does easily what notepad does poorly, >>> namely opening and editing huge files. > >> Yes, there are programs that are not Notepad that have different pros and >> cons. But why are you moving the goal post to this completely off topic idea >> which is not in contention? > >> Wait: you answer this below! > >>>> Not buying it. >>> >>> Because you have no clue how programs work with files. > >> Oh, you moved goal posts to help with you making up stories about ME. You >> wanted to talk about ME again and not technology. > >> Your obsession with me is not flattering. > > 30 day plonk. > Wed Sep 23 15:05:48 EDT 2015 > THANK YOU! Not that I believe you... but I commend you for working to get over your obsession with me. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 14 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web