Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #331772 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-09 02:20 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-11-16 11:41 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 327 — 27 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 02:20 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 18:55 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-08 20:02 -0700
Circus Alert.. Don't take the bait Fabian Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-08 22:11 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 04:22 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-08 21:50 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 05:13 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-08 22:38 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 10:45 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-16 09:25 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-16 19:09 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2015-11-16 18:59 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-09 04:38 -0800
Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-08 21:30 -0800
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 06:18 +0000
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-09 12:43 +0000
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 12:09 -0700
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 11:28 -0800
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:03 -0700
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-09 20:26 +0000
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:27 -0700
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-09 15:39 -0500
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 15:45 -0500
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-11-09 21:53 +0100
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 16:01 -0500
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 17:14 -0500
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 15:18 -0700
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 17:48 -0500
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-11-10 01:58 +0100
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:28 -0700
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-11-10 02:30 +0100
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:24 -0700
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-10 22:50 +0000
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 06:31 +0000
Fabian Russell is disabled. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-08 23:12 -0800
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:03 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 03:12 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:04 -0700
Rot in Hell, Russell. There Moi fixed your 1st post. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 02:31 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-09 12:39 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 06:47 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-09 15:35 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 07:51 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-09 16:31 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 11:32 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:01 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 20:04 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 15:18 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 21:01 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 16:08 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:35 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 13:54 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 20:54 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 21:13 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 17:17 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-09 23:24 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 17:36 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:37 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:32 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 13:04 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:30 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 18:44 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 03:58 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 21:38 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 08:18 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 15:15 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 10:49 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 07:54 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 11:21 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 08:46 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:27 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:25 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 12:45 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 22:30 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 17:37 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 18:04 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 01:30 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 18:59 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 03:15 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-11 07:22 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 10:20 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-12 21:32 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 14:51 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-12 22:13 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-12 23:17 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 15:28 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-12 22:38 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-12 18:40 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-12 23:24 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-13 00:33 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-13 10:57 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-13 12:21 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-13 12:26 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-13 14:57 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-13 17:04 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-13 07:25 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 11:48 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-13 17:09 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-13 20:39 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 15:43 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-13 21:30 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-16 09:27 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-13 22:18 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-16 09:29 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-12 18:39 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-13 10:55 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 10:26 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 15:26 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-12 22:42 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-12 16:06 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-12 23:25 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-12 23:36 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-12 18:46 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-13 00:35 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-13 14:54 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-13 14:53 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 15:36 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 17:40 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-12 18:37 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-13 00:40 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 18:01 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 01:29 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 18:47 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 02:29 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 19:34 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-12 21:45 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 19:05 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-12 21:03 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 02:26 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 19:35 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 02:51 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-12 22:00 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 03:36 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-12 22:41 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 19:46 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 20:00 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 03:18 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 01:49 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 10:27 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 11:15 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-13 11:30 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 11:32 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 08:45 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 12:12 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 10:25 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 12:27 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 10:41 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 12:40 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 10:47 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 12:52 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 10:06 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 10:25 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 10:28 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 11:52 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 10:02 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 12:15 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 08:24 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 12:52 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-12 21:44 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 10:24 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-14 01:01 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 20:08 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 20:17 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 02:07 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-09 21:48 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 14:23 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 21:25 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 14:37 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:41 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 21:07 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 04:05 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 21:48 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 08:20 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 15:18 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:29 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:28 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 12:46 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:36 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 18:32 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:39 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 18:46 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 04:09 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 21:47 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 08:21 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-10 14:48 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 10:34 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-10 18:27 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:31 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 20:51 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 21:21 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 21:49 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 15:12 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:48 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 04:14 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 21:47 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:33 -0700
GhostScipt works well on Windows. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-09 16:09 -0800
Re: GhostScipt works well on Windows. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 19:54 -0500
Re: GhostScipt works well on Windows. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:49 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-11-10 03:23 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-11 09:42 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-11 13:29 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-11 13:08 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 16:58 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:43 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 04:18 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 21:46 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:49 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:48 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 04:56 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-08 22:15 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 05:27 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-08 22:43 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-09 04:35 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 06:46 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-09 10:14 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 18:02 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 12:15 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:06 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 14:13 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-09 06:13 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-09 12:32 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 11:38 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-09 07:51 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-09 09:48 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-09 10:03 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 18:05 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-09 13:19 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 14:24 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:08 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 16:35 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 13:52 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 12:17 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:07 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-09 21:46 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 14:26 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:52 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-11-10 02:54 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:51 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-10 10:27 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 06:52 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-10 13:21 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 07:39 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:55 -0700
Are the FOSS community "suckers", Kreep? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-10 07:12 -0600
Re: Are the FOSS community "suckers", Kreep? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-10 08:22 -0500
Re: Are the FOSS community "suckers", Kreep? GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:58 -0700
Re: Are the FOSS community "suckers", Kreep? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-11 09:27 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:58 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-10 22:01 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-10 23:15 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:38 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-11 00:45 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-11 14:15 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 18:10 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 17:33 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-12 21:58 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-12 23:15 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-12 22:19 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 15:30 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 00:37 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 18:00 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 01:24 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 18:46 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 02:28 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 19:34 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-13 10:27 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 02:41 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 09:44 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 10:23 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 11:06 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 17:27 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 15:24 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 15:33 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-11 10:05 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-11 11:20 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-11 13:27 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 10:36 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-12 22:58 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 15:15 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-11 06:15 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:37 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 09:31 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:55 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:54 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-11-11 20:05 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-12 10:03 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-12 10:18 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-12 11:40 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-12 11:40 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 21:14 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:53 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-10 18:00 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:39 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-11 18:00 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-11-11 20:02 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-12 06:46 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-12 11:41 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-12 09:22 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-12 11:43 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-12 18:07 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-13 07:35 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-13 14:58 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-13 14:57 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-14 07:30 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-14 12:18 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-14 22:09 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-14 20:12 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-15 03:31 +0000
To dvus. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-16 11:40 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-15 10:46 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-16 11:38 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-16 14:47 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-16 20:26 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-16 14:43 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-16 14:19 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-16 15:39 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-16 15:38 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-16 15:37 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-17 05:30 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-11-17 14:57 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-17 20:04 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-11-17 19:26 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 08:14 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-11-09 06:52 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-15 11:05 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-16 11:41 -0700
Page 14 of 17 — ← Prev page 1 … 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 Next page →
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 00:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <seraf0.af@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #332726 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 11/12/15, 3:15 PM, in article n232sv$sid$3@dont-email.me, "Peter > Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > >> Fabian Russell wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:33:17 -0800, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> >>>>> >>>>> Blanks? OS X handles *spaces* just fine... but what is a blank? >>>> >>>> LOL! You have a 'Master in IT' and you've never heard (blank) spaces >>>> referred to as blanks? >>>> >>> >>> You are both fscked. >>> >>> The correct term in this case is "white space." >>> >>> The term "white space" refers to anything that would be invisible >>> in a editor or in output. It could be a TAB or other non-printable >>> char. >> >> Except that a space (blank) *is* visible in an editor as well as in output. >> It is *not* a control-char > > Again correct. And I have noted I may have been too harsh on you for your > terminology of "blank". It is not common but I accept you do not speak > English as your primary language and it was not hard to understand. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_character https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitespace_character https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Control_characters https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Blank_characters
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 18:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26A844C.63B29%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #332757 |
On 11/12/15, 5:37 PM, in article seraf0.af@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 11/12/15, 3:15 PM, in article n232sv$sid$3@dont-email.me, "Peter >> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >> >>> Fabian Russell wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:33:17 -0800, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Blanks? OS X handles *spaces* just fine... but what is a blank? >>>>> >>>>> LOL! You have a 'Master in IT' and you've never heard (blank) spaces >>>>> referred to as blanks? >>>>> >>>> >>>> You are both fscked. >>>> >>>> The correct term in this case is "white space." >>>> >>>> The term "white space" refers to anything that would be invisible >>>> in a editor or in output. It could be a TAB or other non-printable >>>> char. >>> >>> Except that a space (blank) *is* visible in an editor as well as in output. >>> It is *not* a control-char >> >> Again correct. And I have noted I may have been too harsh on you for your >> terminology of "blank". It is not common but I accept you do not speak >> English as your primary language and it was not hard to understand. >> > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_character > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitespace_character > https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Control_characters > https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Blank_characters > I am open to when you think you have a point to make. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 01:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sfea03a.f@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #332764 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 11/12/15, 5:37 PM, in article seraf0.af@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 11/12/15, 3:15 PM, in article n232sv$sid$3@dont-email.me, "Peter >>> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>> >>>> Fabian Russell wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:33:17 -0800, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Blanks? OS X handles *spaces* just fine... but what is a blank? >>>>>> >>>>>> LOL! You have a 'Master in IT' and you've never heard (blank) spaces >>>>>> referred to as blanks? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You are both fscked. >>>>> >>>>> The correct term in this case is "white space." >>>>> >>>>> The term "white space" refers to anything that would be invisible >>>>> in a editor or in output. It could be a TAB or other non-printable >>>>> char. >>>> >>>> Except that a space (blank) *is* visible in an editor as well as in output. >>>> It is *not* a control-char >>> >>> Again correct. And I have noted I may have been too harsh on you for your >>> terminology of "blank". It is not common but I accept you do not speak >>> English as your primary language and it was not hard to understand. >>> >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_character >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitespace_character >> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Control_characters >> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Blank_characters >> > > I am open to when you think you have a point to make. > Read the last link. The one that describes "blank characters."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 18:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26A8F19.63B59%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #332771 |
On 11/12/15, 6:24 PM, in article sfea03a.f@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 11/12/15, 5:37 PM, in article seraf0.af@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 11/12/15, 3:15 PM, in article n232sv$sid$3@dont-email.me, "Peter >>>> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:33:17 -0800, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Blanks? OS X handles *spaces* just fine... but what is a blank? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> LOL! You have a 'Master in IT' and you've never heard (blank) spaces >>>>>>> referred to as blanks? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You are both fscked. >>>>>> >>>>>> The correct term in this case is "white space." >>>>>> >>>>>> The term "white space" refers to anything that would be invisible >>>>>> in a editor or in output. It could be a TAB or other non-printable >>>>>> char. >>>>> >>>>> Except that a space (blank) *is* visible in an editor as well as in >>>>> output. >>>>> It is *not* a control-char >>>> >>>> Again correct. And I have noted I may have been too harsh on you for your >>>> terminology of "blank". It is not common but I accept you do not speak >>>> English as your primary language and it was not hard to understand. >>>> >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_character >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitespace_character >>> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Control_characters >>> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Blank_characters >>> >> >> I am open to when you think you have a point to make. >> > > Read the last link. The one that describes "blank characters." I am open to when you think you have a point to make. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 02:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hfaua0.a3r@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #332779 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 11/12/15, 6:24 PM, in article sfea03a.f@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 11/12/15, 5:37 PM, in article seraf0.af@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 11/12/15, 3:15 PM, in article n232sv$sid$3@dont-email.me, "Peter >>>>> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:33:17 -0800, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Blanks? OS X handles *spaces* just fine... but what is a blank? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> LOL! You have a 'Master in IT' and you've never heard (blank) spaces >>>>>>>> referred to as blanks? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You are both fscked. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The correct term in this case is "white space." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The term "white space" refers to anything that would be invisible >>>>>>> in a editor or in output. It could be a TAB or other non-printable >>>>>>> char. >>>>>> >>>>>> Except that a space (blank) *is* visible in an editor as well as in >>>>>> output. >>>>>> It is *not* a control-char >>>>> >>>>> Again correct. And I have noted I may have been too harsh on you for your >>>>> terminology of "blank". It is not common but I accept you do not speak >>>>> English as your primary language and it was not hard to understand. >>>>> >>>> >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_character >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitespace_character >>>> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Control_characters >>>> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Blank_characters >>>> >>> >>> I am open to when you think you have a point to make. >>> >> >> Read the last link. The one that describes "blank characters." > > I am open to when you think you have a point to make. > Damn you are dense.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 19:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26A9A5B.63B88%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #332793 |
On 11/12/15, 7:28 PM, in article hfaua0.a3r@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 11/12/15, 6:24 PM, in article sfea03a.f@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 11/12/15, 5:37 PM, in article seraf0.af@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 11/12/15, 3:15 PM, in article n232sv$sid$3@dont-email.me, "Peter >>>>>> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:33:17 -0800, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Blanks? OS X handles *spaces* just fine... but what is a blank? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> LOL! You have a 'Master in IT' and you've never heard (blank) spaces >>>>>>>>> referred to as blanks? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You are both fscked. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The correct term in this case is "white space." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The term "white space" refers to anything that would be invisible >>>>>>>> in a editor or in output. It could be a TAB or other non-printable >>>>>>>> char. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Except that a space (blank) *is* visible in an editor as well as in >>>>>>> output. >>>>>>> It is *not* a control-char >>>>>> >>>>>> Again correct. And I have noted I may have been too harsh on you for your >>>>>> terminology of "blank". It is not common but I accept you do not speak >>>>>> English as your primary language and it was not hard to understand. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_character >>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitespace_character >>>>> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Control_characters >>>>> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Blank_characters >>>>> >>>> >>>> I am open to when you think you have a point to make. >>>> >>> >>> Read the last link. The one that describes "blank characters." >> >> I am open to when you think you have a point to make. >> > > Damn you are dense. > LOL! You are the one posting over and over and failing to make a point. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 10:27 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n24aaf$gmh$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #332779 |
The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > On 11/12/15, 6:24 PM, in article sfea03a.f@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 11/12/15, 5:37 PM, in article seraf0.af@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 11/12/15, 3:15 PM, in article n232sv$sid$3@dont-email.me, "Peter >>>>> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:33:17 -0800, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Blanks? OS X handles *spaces* just fine... but what is a blank? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> LOL! You have a 'Master in IT' and you've never heard (blank) >>>>>>>> spaces referred to as blanks? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You are both fscked. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The correct term in this case is "white space." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The term "white space" refers to anything that would be invisible >>>>>>> in a editor or in output. It could be a TAB or other non-printable >>>>>>> char. >>>>>> >>>>>> Except that a space (blank) *is* visible in an editor as well as in >>>>>> output. >>>>>> It is *not* a control-char >>>>> >>>>> Again correct. And I have noted I may have been too harsh on you for >>>>> your terminology of "blank". It is not common but I accept you do not >>>>> speak English as your primary language and it was not hard to >>>>> understand. >>>>> >>>> >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_character >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitespace_character >>>> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Control_characters >>>> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Blank_characters >>>> >>> >>> I am open to when you think you have a point to make. >>> >> >> Read the last link. The one that describes "blank characters." > > I am open to when you think you have a point to make. > > The point is clear: The "IT specialist" Snit Michael Glasser hasn't the foggiest about IT
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 02:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26AFE51.63C2B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #332844 |
On 11/13/15, 2:27 AM, in article n24aaf$gmh$1@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > >> On 11/12/15, 6:24 PM, in article sfea03a.f@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 11/12/15, 5:37 PM, in article seraf0.af@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 11/12/15, 3:15 PM, in article n232sv$sid$3@dont-email.me, "Peter >>>>>> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:33:17 -0800, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Blanks? OS X handles *spaces* just fine... but what is a blank? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> LOL! You have a 'Master in IT' and you've never heard (blank) >>>>>>>>> spaces referred to as blanks? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You are both fscked. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The correct term in this case is "white space." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The term "white space" refers to anything that would be invisible >>>>>>>> in a editor or in output. It could be a TAB or other non-printable >>>>>>>> char. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Except that a space (blank) *is* visible in an editor as well as in >>>>>>> output. >>>>>>> It is *not* a control-char >>>>>> >>>>>> Again correct. And I have noted I may have been too harsh on you for >>>>>> your terminology of "blank". It is not common but I accept you do not >>>>>> speak English as your primary language and it was not hard to >>>>>> understand. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_character >>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitespace_character >>>>> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Control_characters >>>>> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Blank_characters >>>>> >>>> >>>> I am open to when you think you have a point to make. >>>> >>> >>> Read the last link. The one that describes "blank characters." >> >> I am open to when you think you have a point to make. >> >> > > The point is clear: The "IT specialist" Snit Michael Glasser hasn't the > foggiest about IT Yet you could not figure out what the "Quit" command did in Linux programs. Somehow your view on my skills is really not relevant. :) -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 09:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <shfu0q.afppe@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #332848 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 11/13/15, 2:27 AM, in article n24aaf$gmh$1@dont-email.me, "Peter > Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > >> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: >> >>> On 11/12/15, 6:24 PM, in article sfea03a.f@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 11/12/15, 5:37 PM, in article seraf0.af@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/12/15, 3:15 PM, in article n232sv$sid$3@dont-email.me, "Peter >>>>>>> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:33:17 -0800, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Blanks? OS X handles *spaces* just fine... but what is a blank? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> LOL! You have a 'Master in IT' and you've never heard (blank) >>>>>>>>>> spaces referred to as blanks? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You are both fscked. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The correct term in this case is "white space." >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The term "white space" refers to anything that would be invisible >>>>>>>>> in a editor or in output. It could be a TAB or other non-printable >>>>>>>>> char. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Except that a space (blank) *is* visible in an editor as well as in >>>>>>>> output. >>>>>>>> It is *not* a control-char >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Again correct. And I have noted I may have been too harsh on you for >>>>>>> your terminology of "blank". It is not common but I accept you do not >>>>>>> speak English as your primary language and it was not hard to >>>>>>> understand. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_character >>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitespace_character >>>>>> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Control_characters >>>>>> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Blank_characters >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I am open to when you think you have a point to make. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Read the last link. The one that describes "blank characters." >>> >>> I am open to when you think you have a point to make. >>> >>> >> >> The point is clear: The "IT specialist" Snit Michael Glasser hasn't the >> foggiest about IT > > Yet you could not figure out what the "Quit" command did in Linux programs. > Somehow your view on my skills is really not relevant. :) > LOL. The man who makes 400 posts a week to cola accuses someone of not knowing what "quit" means.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 10:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26B6AB0.63CB1%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #332849 |
On 11/13/15, 2:44 AM, in article shfu0q.afppe@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> The point is clear: The "IT specialist" Snit Michael Glasser hasn't the >>> foggiest about IT >> >> Yet you could not figure out what the "Quit" command did in Linux programs. >> Somehow your view on my skills is really not relevant. :) >> > > LOL. The man who makes 400 posts a week to cola accuses someone of not > knowing what "quit" means. And you miss the point. Whatever. You are in freak out mode over my not accepting your view that Christians deserve special entitlements. Boo hoo for you. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 11:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n251lm$a2f$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #332844 |
On 2015-11-13 4:27 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > >> On 11/12/15, 6:24 PM, in article sfea03a.f@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 11/12/15, 5:37 PM, in article seraf0.af@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 11/12/15, 3:15 PM, in article n232sv$sid$3@dont-email.me, "Peter >>>>>> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:33:17 -0800, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Blanks? OS X handles *spaces* just fine... but what is a blank? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> LOL! You have a 'Master in IT' and you've never heard (blank) >>>>>>>>> spaces referred to as blanks? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You are both fscked. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The correct term in this case is "white space." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The term "white space" refers to anything that would be invisible >>>>>>>> in a editor or in output. It could be a TAB or other non-printable >>>>>>>> char. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Except that a space (blank) *is* visible in an editor as well as in >>>>>>> output. >>>>>>> It is *not* a control-char >>>>>> >>>>>> Again correct. And I have noted I may have been too harsh on you for >>>>>> your terminology of "blank". It is not common but I accept you do not >>>>>> speak English as your primary language and it was not hard to >>>>>> understand. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_character >>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitespace_character >>>>> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Control_characters >>>>> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Blank_characters >>>>> >>>> >>>> I am open to when you think you have a point to make. >>>> >>> >>> Read the last link. The one that describes "blank characters." >> >> I am open to when you think you have a point to make. >> >> > > The point is clear: The "IT specialist" Snit Michael Glasser hasn't the > foggiest about IT Neither do you. Luckily, Germans doesn't need IT experts as much as it needs butt wipers for the migrants. Now wipe your "refugee" asses and make yourself useful, Klöwn. -- Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 17:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <75c13587-a071-40e7-a698-92324b853e4a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #332726 |
On Thursday, November 12, 2015 at 3:30:12 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 11/12/15, 3:15 PM, in article n232sv$sid$3@dont-email.me, "Peter > Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > > > Fabian Russell wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:33:17 -0800, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> > >>>> > >>>> Blanks? OS X handles *spaces* just fine... but what is a blank? > >>> > >>> LOL! You have a 'Master in IT' and you've never heard (blank) spaces > >>> referred to as blanks? > >>> > >> > >> You are both fscked. > >> > >> The correct term in this case is "white space." > >> > >> The term "white space" refers to anything that would be invisible > >> in a editor or in output. It could be a TAB or other non-printable > >> char. > > > > Except that a space (blank) *is* visible in an editor as well as in output. > > It is *not* a control-char > > Again correct. And I have noted I may have been too harsh on you for your > terminology of "blank". It is not common but I accept you do not speak > English as your primary language and it was not hard to understand. LOL! Snit... trying to be 'clever' again... way too funny ;) Fact: His primary language isn't relevant at all, *you* could either understand what he wrote or you couldn't. Earlier you made it clear you couldn't understand something that you are now admitting "was not hard to understand". See how reality works YET?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 15:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26A5F9B.63AB6%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #332712 |
On 11/12/15, 2:58 PM, in article pan.2015.11.12.21.57.07@localhost.localdomain, "Fabian Russell" <root@localhost.localdomain> wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:33:17 -0800, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> >>> Blanks? OS X handles *spaces* just fine... but what is a blank? >> >> LOL! You have a 'Master in IT' and you've never heard (blank) spaces referred >> to as blanks? > > You are both fscked. > > The correct term in this case is "white space." > > The term "white space" refers to anything that would be invisible > in a editor or in output. It could be a TAB or other non-printable > char. Hence the reason it is not specific. The term "space" is. To be fair to Peter I have sometimes heard the term "blank" to mean a space or similar character - it is just not common. Given English is not his first language I should have perhaps been more forgiving with him on that. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 15:33 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <4f66895d-708f-4d19-afc1-f86b81846be3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #332712 |
On Thursday, November 12, 2015 at 2:57:25 PM UTC-7, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:33:17 -0800, Steve Carroll wrote: > > >> > >> Blanks? OS X handles *spaces* just fine... but what is a blank? > > > > LOL! You have a 'Master in IT' and you've never heard (blank) spaces referred to as blanks? > > > > You are both fscked. > > The correct term in this case is "white space." LOL! You're almost as stupid as Snit is and that's quite a feat ;) But hey, I'll bite, can always use another laugh. Under what authority is the term "white space" the only "correct term"?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-11 10:05 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n1v092$rno$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #332478 |
The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > On 11/10/15, 3:15 PM, in article n1tq50$gbl$1@dont-email.me, "Peter > Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > >>>> My post was to the cretinous claims of a dimbulb calling itself >>>> "GreyCloud" >>>> >>>> He actually is stupid enough to claim that OSX cli parser is "smart" >>>> enough to recognize this all by itself. >>> >>> He's a clown. The "OSX cli parser" is just bash. >>> >>> _[/Users/scott]_(scott@OSX)_ >>> $ set | grep VERSION >>> BASH_VERSION='3.2.53(1)-release' >>> >>> _[/home/scott]_(scott@LINUX)_ >>> $ set | grep VERSION >>> BASH_VERSION='4.3.11(1)-release' >>> >>> >> >> He certainly is a very deluded clown. He does not even know that OSX cli >> is just a very standard bash console. >> And he is stupid enough to claim that OSX does not share the problems >> (which are present on all OS) with blanks in filenames. > > Blanks? OS X handles *spaces* just fine... but what is a blank? So you are a IT "specialist", knowing everything. According to your claims. You know linux better than linux users, you know windows better than actual windows users, and your OSX knowledge is (maybe) only surpassed by the OSX developers And you know jack shit about naming conventions in IT Yes, that figures... >> They are not difficult to >> overcome (usually), but can be a PITA if you generate filenames like that >> with regular expressions > > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-11 11:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <120588989468933414.683506usenet-gallopinginsanity.com@news.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #332509 |
Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > >> On 11/10/15, 3:15 PM, in article n1tq50$gbl$1@dont-email.me, "Peter >> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >> >>>>> My post was to the cretinous claims of a dimbulb calling itself >>>>> "GreyCloud" >>>>> >>>>> He actually is stupid enough to claim that OSX cli parser is "smart" >>>>> enough to recognize this all by itself. >>>> >>>> He's a clown. The "OSX cli parser" is just bash. >>>> >>>> _[/Users/scott]_(scott@OSX)_ >>>> $ set | grep VERSION >>>> BASH_VERSION='3.2.53(1)-release' >>>> >>>> _[/home/scott]_(scott@LINUX)_ >>>> $ set | grep VERSION >>>> BASH_VERSION='4.3.11(1)-release' >>>> >>>> >>> >>> He certainly is a very deluded clown. He does not even know that OSX cli >>> is just a very standard bash console. >>> And he is stupid enough to claim that OSX does not share the problems >>> (which are present on all OS) with blanks in filenames. >> >> Blanks? OS X handles *spaces* just fine... but what is a blank? > > So you are a IT "specialist", knowing everything. According to your claims. > You know linux better than linux users, That is your claim - I never said it. So YOU describe me as knowing Linux better than (other) Linux users. > you know windows better than actual > windows users, Again: your claim, not mine. > and your OSX knowledge is (maybe) only surpassed by the OSX > developers Again: your claim, not mine.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-11 13:27 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n1vc2d$514$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #332518 |
The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: >> >>> On 11/10/15, 3:15 PM, in article n1tq50$gbl$1@dont-email.me, "Peter >>> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>> >>>>>> My post was to the cretinous claims of a dimbulb calling itself >>>>>> "GreyCloud" >>>>>> >>>>>> He actually is stupid enough to claim that OSX cli parser is "smart" >>>>>> enough to recognize this all by itself. >>>>> >>>>> He's a clown. The "OSX cli parser" is just bash. >>>>> >>>>> _[/Users/scott]_(scott@OSX)_ >>>>> $ set | grep VERSION >>>>> BASH_VERSION='3.2.53(1)-release' >>>>> >>>>> _[/home/scott]_(scott@LINUX)_ >>>>> $ set | grep VERSION >>>>> BASH_VERSION='4.3.11(1)-release' >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> He certainly is a very deluded clown. He does not even know that OSX >>>> cli is just a very standard bash console. >>>> And he is stupid enough to claim that OSX does not share the problems >>>> (which are present on all OS) with blanks in filenames. >>> >>> Blanks? OS X handles *spaces* just fine... but what is a blank? >> >> So you are a IT "specialist", knowing everything. According to your >> claims. You know linux better than linux users, > > That is your claim - I never said it. So YOU describe me as knowing Linux > better than (other) Linux users. No. I describe you as the imbecile you really are. You think that you are clever and know more than most people. In reality you are just simply a deluded dimbulb >> you know windows better than actual >> windows users, > > Again: your claim, not mine. > >> and your OSX knowledge is (maybe) only surpassed by the OSX >> developers > > Again: your claim, not mine.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 10:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26A1C1A.63A0C%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #332521 |
On 11/11/15, 5:27 AM, in article n1vc2d$514$1@dont-email.me, "Peter
Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled:
>
>> Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>>> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled:
>>>
>>>> On 11/10/15, 3:15 PM, in article n1tq50$gbl$1@dont-email.me, "Peter
>>>> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> My post was to the cretinous claims of a dimbulb calling itself
>>>>>>> "GreyCloud"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He actually is stupid enough to claim that OSX cli parser is "smart"
>>>>>>> enough to recognize this all by itself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He's a clown. The "OSX cli parser" is just bash.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _[/Users/scott]_(scott@OSX)_
>>>>>> $ set | grep VERSION
>>>>>> BASH_VERSION='3.2.53(1)-release'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _[/home/scott]_(scott@LINUX)_
>>>>>> $ set | grep VERSION
>>>>>> BASH_VERSION='4.3.11(1)-release'
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> He certainly is a very deluded clown. He does not even know that OSX
>>>>> cli is just a very standard bash console.
>>>>> And he is stupid enough to claim that OSX does not share the problems
>>>>> (which are present on all OS) with blanks in filenames.
>>>>
>>>> Blanks? OS X handles *spaces* just fine... but what is a blank?
>>>
>>> So you are a IT "specialist", knowing everything. According to your
>>> claims. You know linux better than linux users,
>>
>> That is your claim - I never said it. So YOU describe me as knowing Linux
>> better than (other) Linux users.
>
> No. I describe you as the imbecile you really are.
These are the phrases YOU described me with:
Peter Köhlmann, referring to Snit:
-----
You know linux better than linux users, you know windows better
than actual windows users, and your OSX knowledge is (maybe) only
surpassed by the OSX developers
-----
Yes, you falsely attributed these ideas to me, but the reality is these are
your ideas and your ideas alone. I did not suggest, hint, say, or imply
these were true in any way.
It shows how YOU think of me.
> You think that you are clever and know more than most people.
Again: this is YOUR view of me. You put me down because it is clear to YOU I
know more than YOU.
> In reality you are just simply a deluded dimbulb
And yet you describe me this way:
Peter Köhlmann, referring to Snit:
-----
You know linux better than linux users, you know windows better
than actual windows users, and your OSX knowledge is (maybe) only
surpassed by the OSX developers
-----
--
* OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 22:58 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n231tj$po0$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #332666 |
The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > On 11/11/15, 5:27 AM, in article n1vc2d$514$1@dont-email.me, "Peter > Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > >> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: >> >>> Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: >>>> >>>>> On 11/10/15, 3:15 PM, in article n1tq50$gbl$1@dont-email.me, "Peter >>>>> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>> My post was to the cretinous claims of a dimbulb calling itself >>>>>>>> "GreyCloud" >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> He actually is stupid enough to claim that OSX cli parser is >>>>>>>> "smart" enough to recognize this all by itself. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> He's a clown. The "OSX cli parser" is just bash. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _[/Users/scott]_(scott@OSX)_ >>>>>>> $ set | grep VERSION >>>>>>> BASH_VERSION='3.2.53(1)-release' >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _[/home/scott]_(scott@LINUX)_ >>>>>>> $ set | grep VERSION >>>>>>> BASH_VERSION='4.3.11(1)-release' >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> He certainly is a very deluded clown. He does not even know that OSX >>>>>> cli is just a very standard bash console. >>>>>> And he is stupid enough to claim that OSX does not share the problems >>>>>> (which are present on all OS) with blanks in filenames. >>>>> >>>>> Blanks? OS X handles *spaces* just fine... but what is a blank? >>>> >>>> So you are a IT "specialist", knowing everything. According to your >>>> claims. You know linux better than linux users, >>> >>> That is your claim - I never said it. So YOU describe me as knowing >>> Linux >>> better than (other) Linux users. >> >> No. I describe you as the imbecile you really are. > > These are the phrases YOU described me with: > > Peter Köhlmann, referring to Snit: > ----- > You know linux better than linux users, you know windows better > than actual windows users, and your OSX knowledge is (maybe) only > surpassed by the OSX developers > ----- > > Yes, you falsely attributed these ideas to me, but the reality is these > are your ideas and your ideas alone. I did not suggest, hint, say, or > imply these were true in any way. > > It shows how YOU think of me. > >> You think that you are clever and know more than most people. > > Again: this is YOUR view of me. You put me down because it is clear to YOU > I know more than YOU. > >> In reality you are just simply a deluded dimbulb > > And yet you describe me this way: > > Peter Köhlmann, referring to Snit: > ----- > You know linux better than linux users, you know windows better > than actual windows users, and your OSX knowledge is (maybe) only > surpassed by the OSX developers > ----- > Idiot. I don't "describe" you that way. It is your own view of yourself. You are a retard who thinks of himself as a genius And that you are competely unable to understand simple sentences have you just proven beyond any doubt
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 15:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26A5D8D.63AAC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #332713 |
On 11/12/15, 2:58 PM, in article n231tj$po0$1@dont-email.me, "Peter
Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>> And yet you describe me this way:
>>
>> Peter Köhlmann, referring to Snit:
>> -----
>> You know linux better than linux users, you know windows better
>> than actual windows users, and your OSX knowledge is (maybe) only
>> surpassed by the OSX developers
>> -----
>>
>
> Idiot.
And that is how you repeatedly describe yourself. Sure. This is your
issue... you see yourself as that word you have made be synonymous with your
own name, and you work to tear down those you see as better than you. With
me, YOUR exact description was:
Peter Köhlmann, referring to Snit:
-----
You know linux better than linux users, you know windows better
than actual windows users, and your OSX knowledge is (maybe) only
surpassed by the OSX developers
-----
Sure, you falsely attributed your OWN ideas to me. No doubt. Not saying you
did not. But it is not a claim I ever made or even suggested or hinted was
true. It came fully from you.
> I don't "describe" you that way.
Those are your exact words. You can deny it all you wish, but those are YOUR
words.
> It is your own view of yourself.
Yet you cannot show me ever describing myself that way because I never have.
You are getting very defensive here!
> You are a retard who thinks of himself as a genius
See: you work to put me down to try to feel better about yourself. And you
do so again, below. Repeatedly you attack those you see as being your
betters.
> And that you are competely unable to understand simple sentences have you
> just proven beyond any doubt
--
* OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 14 of 17 — ← Prev page 1 … 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web