Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #328947 > unrolled thread
| Started by | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-27 21:39 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-10-30 15:44 -0600 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 116 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
allol akbar owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-27 21:39 +0000
Re: allol akbar Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-27 17:41 -0400
Re: allol akbar Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 15:14 -0700
Re: allol akbar Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-27 18:56 -0400
Re: allol akbar Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-28 00:14 +0100
Re: allol akbar Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 16:54 -0700
Re: allol akbar Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-27 20:04 -0400
Re: allol akbar Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 17:31 -0700
Re: allol akbar Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 17:59 -0700
Re: allol akbar Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 08:39 -0400
Re: allol akbar Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 08:46 -0700
Re: allol akbar Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 09:46 -0700
Re: allol akbar Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 13:18 -0400
Re: allol akbar Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 10:44 -0700
Re: allol akbar GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-28 18:46 -0600
Re: allol akbar Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 17:52 -0700
Re: allol akbar GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-28 18:43 -0600
Re: allol akbar Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 17:55 -0700
Re: allol akbar GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 12:30 -0600
Re: allol akbar Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 11:41 -0700
Re: allol akbar GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 20:00 -0600
Re: allol akbar GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-28 18:41 -0600
Re: allol akbar Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 16:52 -0700
Re: allol akbar Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-28 00:55 +0100
Re: allol akbar owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 00:21 +0000
Re: allol akbar Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 08:38 -0400
Re: allol akbar owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 15:08 +0000
Re: allol akbar Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 08:14 -0700
Re: allol akbar Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 12:47 -0400
Re: allol akbar vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-10-27 21:46 +0000
Re: allol akbar owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-27 22:09 +0000
Re: allol akbar DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-27 17:52 -0400
Re: allol akbar owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-27 22:13 +0000
Re: allol akbar Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 15:15 -0700
Re: allol akbar owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-27 22:21 +0000
Re: allol akbar Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-27 18:56 -0400
Re: allol akbar DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-27 19:40 -0400
Re: allol akbar Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-27 20:08 -0400
Re: allol akbar DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-27 22:41 -0400
Re: allol akbar owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 03:42 +0000
Re: allol akbar DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-27 19:20 -0400
Re: allol akbar owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-27 23:25 +0000
Re: allol akbar Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 15:14 -0700
Re: allol akbar Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-27 18:53 -0400
Re: allol akbar Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 15:13 -0700
Re: allol akbar Marti van Lin <martivanlin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 21:14 -0700
Re: allol akbar Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-10-29 06:18 -0400
Re: allol akbar William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-10-29 11:28 +0000
Re: allol akbar chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-29 06:55 -0500
Re: allol akbar "Rockinghorse Winnner" <rockhorse@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 13:13 +0100
Re: allol akbar chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-29 09:31 -0500
Re: allol akbar ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 15:25 +0000
Re: allol akbar Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 12:25 -0400
Re: allol akbar "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-10-29 12:57 -0400
Re: allol akbar Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-29 12:59 -0400
Make that +2! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 15:32 -0600
Re: allol akbar JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 10:23 -0500
Re: allol akbar ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 15:43 +0000
Re: allol akbar chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-29 11:03 -0500
Re: allol akbar ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 16:24 +0000
Re: allol akbar JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 11:18 -0500
Re: allol akbar ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 17:04 +0000
Re: allol akbar JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 13:46 -0500
Re: allol akbar cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-29 12:31 -0700
Re: allol akbar GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 20:03 -0600
Re: allol akbar GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 15:38 -0600
Re: allol akbar GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 12:52 -0600
Re: allol akbar Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-10-29 16:19 -0400
Re: allol akbar owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 20:52 +0000
Re: allol akbar "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-10-29 19:23 -0400
Re: allol akbar owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 01:32 +0000
Re: allol akbar GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 20:04 -0600
Re: allol akbar "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-10-30 10:06 -0400
Re: allol akbar Marti van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2015-10-31 11:30 +0100
Re: allol akbar Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-10-31 07:32 -0400
You got that right! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 15:31 -0600
Re: allol akbar Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 12:19 -0400
Re: allol akbar Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-29 12:24 -0400
Re: allol akbar Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 09:30 -0700
Re: allol akbar Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 12:32 -0400
Re: allol akbar Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-29 12:41 -0400
Re: allol akbar Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 12:49 -0400
Re: allol akbar Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-29 12:51 -0400
Re: allol akbar Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 13:17 -0400
Re: allol akbar Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 11:45 -0700
Re: allol akbar cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-29 10:00 -0700
Re: allol akbar Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 10:01 -0700
Re: allol akbar cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-29 09:55 -0700
Re: allol akbar Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-29 12:57 -0400
Re: allol akbar Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-10-29 16:18 -0400
Re: allol akbar Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 17:18 -0400
Re: allol akbar "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-10-29 19:37 -0400
Re: allol akbar GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 20:06 -0600
Re: allol akbar "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-10-29 11:39 -0400
Re: allol akbar GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 15:35 -0600
Re: allol akbar Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 08:35 -0400
Re: allol akbar Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 09:31 -0700
Re: allol akbar ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 15:17 +0000
Re: allol akbar Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-29 22:07 -0500
Re: allol akbar Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 09:31 -0400
Re: allol akbar GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 15:40 -0600
Re: allol akbar owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 15:49 +0000
Re: allol akbar DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-05 13:17 -0500
Re: allol akbar Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-10-29 17:09 +0000
Re: allol akbar GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 13:05 -0600
Re: allol akbar owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 22:26 +0000
Re: allol akbar owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 02:15 +0000
Re: allol akbar owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 05:18 +0000
Re: allol akbar Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-30 09:43 -0700
Re: allol akbar owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 17:01 +0000
Re: allol akbar owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 17:25 +0000
Re: allol akbar owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 17:35 +0000
Re: allol akbar owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 18:25 +0000
Re: allol akbar Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 11:32 -0700
Re: allol akbar GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 20:08 -0600
Re: allol akbar GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 15:44 -0600
Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 Next page →
| From | JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 11:18 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <slrnn34hn5.4rj.jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
| In reply to | #329438 |
On 2015-10-29, ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:23:47 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: > >> On 2015-10-29, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> Rockinghorse Winnner wrote: >>> >>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Why? He's an insulting, arrogant, rich bastard who cares only about >>>>> himself. >>>> >>>>Thank you. I finally found a *PERFECT* description of Hillary Clinton. >>> >>> Well, no one can argue with that. Hillary might actually make a decent >>> president, but she's a *really* bad person. >>> >>> >> You don't want a "nice girl", you want an "iron bitch". >> >> ...speak softly, carry a big stick, and know how to use it. > > I don't want a lying, "iron bitch." I want someone who upholds the > Constitution instead of trampling it under foot. > She was secretary of state. What opportunity did she actually have? Obama and his caucus on the other hand did trample the constitution. So did the law enforcement and intellegence wing of the executive.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 17:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n0tjjc$4lt$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #329466 |
On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 11:18:45 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: > On 2015-10-29, ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:23:47 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >> >>> On 2015-10-29, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> Rockinghorse Winnner wrote: >>>> >>>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Why? He's an insulting, arrogant, rich bastard who cares only >>>>>> about himself. >>>>> >>>>>Thank you. I finally found a *PERFECT* description of Hillary >>>>>Clinton. >>>> >>>> Well, no one can argue with that. Hillary might actually make a >>>> decent president, but she's a *really* bad person. >>>> >>>> >>> You don't want a "nice girl", you want an "iron bitch". >>> >>> ...speak softly, carry a big stick, and know how to use it. >> >> I don't want a lying, "iron bitch." I want someone who upholds the >> Constitution instead of trampling it under foot. >> >> > She was secretary of state. What opportunity did she actually have? > > Obama and his caucus on the other hand did trample the constitution. > > So did the law enforcement and intellegence wing of the executive. If you really believe Hillary Clinton would make a good president, by all means vote for the lying bitch. I won't be joining you. She couldn't even obey her own rules in the State Department about confidential emails. And while she was working her Secretary of State gig, she was panhandling for funds for her Clinton Foundation. (Which, I'm guessing, is why she didn't want her email on a State Department server.) -- Zero tolerance for WinDrones and iCultists
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 13:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <slrnn34qc9.rjp.jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
| In reply to | #329497 |
On 2015-10-29, ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 11:18:45 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: > >> On 2015-10-29, ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:23:47 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-10-29, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> Rockinghorse Winnner wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why? He's an insulting, arrogant, rich bastard who cares only >>>>>>> about himself. >>>>>> >>>>>>Thank you. I finally found a *PERFECT* description of Hillary >>>>>>Clinton. >>>>> >>>>> Well, no one can argue with that. Hillary might actually make a >>>>> decent president, but she's a *really* bad person. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> You don't want a "nice girl", you want an "iron bitch". >>>> >>>> ...speak softly, carry a big stick, and know how to use it. >>> >>> I don't want a lying, "iron bitch." I want someone who upholds the >>> Constitution instead of trampling it under foot. >>> >>> >> She was secretary of state. What opportunity did she actually have? >> >> Obama and his caucus on the other hand did trample the constitution. >> >> So did the law enforcement and intellegence wing of the executive. > > If you really believe Hillary Clinton would make a good president, by all Red Herring. > means vote for the lying bitch. I won't be joining you. She couldn't even > obey her own rules in the State Department about confidential emails. And That is in dispute and even Republicans are disputing it (Powell). > while she was working her Secretary of State gig, she was panhandling for > funds for her Clinton Foundation. (Which, I'm guessing, is why she didn't > want her email on a State Department server.) > Ever worked in a Fortune 100 company? Once you do, it's very easy to see why someone would be tempted to wander off the reservation. Once companies get that large, they become their worst enemy in general. That includes the IT department. Government is not likely to be better.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 12:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d6b89536-e825-45f4-a294-4547e1233423@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #329497 |
On Thursday, October 29, 2015 at 2:46:32 PM UTC-4, Snit wrote: > > I do not support her... but she is BY FAR better than any of the > Republicans. I think you'll find many people, such as myself, who traditionally vote democrat would disagree. I don't think she's BY FAR better than any of them, better than some, and worse than a few. And my other option on the democrat side is a straight up socialist. As a wise man once said, "Yeah... well... that's just like... your opinion, man."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 20:03 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <QfydnRLZbI9CUq_LnZ2dnUU7-IudnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #329497 |
On 10/29/15 12:46, Snit wrote: > On 10/29/15, 10:04 AM, in article n0tjjc$4lt$4@dont-email.me, "ronb" > <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > > ... >>>> I don't want a lying, "iron bitch." I want someone who upholds the >>>> Constitution instead of trampling it under foot. >>>> >>>> >>> She was secretary of state. What opportunity did she actually have? >>> >>> Obama and his caucus on the other hand did trample the constitution. >>> >>> So did the law enforcement and intellegence wing of the executive. >> >> If you really believe Hillary Clinton would make a good president, by all >> means vote for the lying bitch. I won't be joining you. She couldn't even >> obey her own rules in the State Department about confidential emails. And >> while she was working her Secretary of State gig, she was panhandling for >> funds for her Clinton Foundation. (Which, I'm guessing, is why she didn't >> want her email on a State Department server.) > > I do not support her... but she is BY FAR better than any of the > Republicans. As far as her emails - the fact that is an issue at all, where > Jeb Bush's email issue is not, completely destroys the idea of a liberal > media. > > It isn't so much about her having her own private email server, it is about National Security. The chinese or the russians could easily have intercepted these emails and most likely already have. It is known as a security breach. She may as well just handed over all her emails to them. -- When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the bottom, and have a longer blanket."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-30 15:38 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <GN-dneYDLd7Vfq7LnZ2dnUU7-f-dnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #329640 |
On 10/29/15 20:18, Snit wrote: > On 10/29/15, 7:03 PM, in article > QfydnRLZbI9CUq_LnZ2dnUU7-IudnZ2d@bresnan.com, "GreyCloud"<cumulus@mist.com> > wrote: > > ... >>>> If you really believe Hillary Clinton would make a good president, by all >>>> means vote for the lying bitch. I won't be joining you. She couldn't even >>>> obey her own rules in the State Department about confidential emails. And >>>> while she was working her Secretary of State gig, she was panhandling for >>>> funds for her Clinton Foundation. (Which, I'm guessing, is why she didn't >>>> want her email on a State Department server.) >>> >>> I do not support her... but she is BY FAR better than any of the >>> Republicans. As far as her emails - the fact that is an issue at all, where >>> Jeb Bush's email issue is not, completely destroys the idea of a liberal >>> media. >>> >> It isn't so much about her having her own private email server, it is >> about National Security. The chinese or the russians could easily have >> intercepted these emails and most likely already have. It is known as a >> security breach. She may as well just handed over all her emails to them. > > Right. I do not defend her on it. But why is Bush's scandal where he had Top > Secret stuff in his emails AND let out lots of SSNs and it is tied to > something like 10 times as many emails. The media pretty much ignores this - > just as they ignored Bush II's email scandal where he lost tens of MILLIONS > of emails. I am sure there was plenty of stuff tied to Iraq which will never > come to light. > From my perspective, a lot of the presidents since JFK have made huge mistakes. Bush was a turncoat and traitor to this country. So is Obama. Both of them signed onto bills that the public isn't allowed to read, let alone any of the members of Congress. Something really wrong is going on. -- When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the bottom, and have a longer blanket."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-31 12:52 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <lpqdnVSO56h8kKjLnZ2dnUU7-fednZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #329856 |
On 10/30/15 17:00, Snit wrote: > On 10/30/15, 2:38 PM, in article > GN-dneYDLd7Vfq7LnZ2dnUU7-f-dnZ2d@bresnan.com, "GreyCloud"<cumulus@mist.com> > wrote: > >> On 10/29/15 20:18, Snit wrote: >>> On 10/29/15, 7:03 PM, in article >>> QfydnRLZbI9CUq_LnZ2dnUU7-IudnZ2d@bresnan.com, "GreyCloud"<cumulus@mist.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> ... >>>>>> If you really believe Hillary Clinton would make a good president, by all >>>>>> means vote for the lying bitch. I won't be joining you. She couldn't even >>>>>> obey her own rules in the State Department about confidential emails. And >>>>>> while she was working her Secretary of State gig, she was panhandling for >>>>>> funds for her Clinton Foundation. (Which, I'm guessing, is why she didn't >>>>>> want her email on a State Department server.) >>>>> >>>>> I do not support her... but she is BY FAR better than any of the >>>>> Republicans. As far as her emails - the fact that is an issue at all, where >>>>> Jeb Bush's email issue is not, completely destroys the idea of a liberal >>>>> media. >>>>> >>>> It isn't so much about her having her own private email server, it is >>>> about National Security. The chinese or the russians could easily have >>>> intercepted these emails and most likely already have. It is known as a >>>> security breach. She may as well just handed over all her emails to them. >>> >>> Right. I do not defend her on it. But why is Bush's scandal where he had Top >>> Secret stuff in his emails AND let out lots of SSNs and it is tied to >>> something like 10 times as many emails. The media pretty much ignores this - >>> just as they ignored Bush II's email scandal where he lost tens of MILLIONS >>> of emails. I am sure there was plenty of stuff tied to Iraq which will never >>> come to light. >>> >> From my perspective, a lot of the presidents since JFK have made huge >> mistakes. Bush was a turncoat and traitor to this country. So is >> Obama. Both of them signed onto bills that the public isn't allowed to >> read, let alone any of the members of Congress. > > What bills? The last one is called TPP. Trans Pacific Partnership. We can't read it, as it is classified, and only certain members of congress were allowed to read it. http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/11/politics/trade-deal-secrecy-tpp/ "Washington (CNN)Two copies of the biggest free trade deal in history are sitting in reading rooms -- one at each end of the Capitol. The document is classified. Only members of Congress and staffers with security clearance can access it. And they can't make copies or even carry their own handwritten notes out the door." > >> Something really wrong is going on. >> >> > > > -- When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the bottom, and have a longer blanket."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 16:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0tut3$316$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #329438 |
ronb wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:23:47 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: > >> On 2015-10-29, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> Rockinghorse Winnner wrote: >>> >>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Why? He's an insulting, arrogant, rich bastard who cares only about >>>>> himself. >>>> >>>>Thank you. I finally found a *PERFECT* description of Hillary Clinton. >>> >>> Well, no one can argue with that. Hillary might actually make a decent >>> president, but she's a *really* bad person. >>> >>> >> You don't want a "nice girl", you want an "iron bitch". >> >> ...speak softly, carry a big stick, and know how to use it. > > I don't want a lying, "iron bitch." I want someone who upholds the > Constitution instead of trampling it under foot. Good luck wit dat dese days. -- You have a strong desire for a home and your family interests come first.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 20:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dfshvn9g.av@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #329557 |
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > ronb wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:23:47 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >> >>> On 2015-10-29, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> Rockinghorse Winnner wrote: >>>> >>>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Why? He's an insulting, arrogant, rich bastard who cares only about >>>>>> himself. >>>>> >>>>>Thank you. I finally found a *PERFECT* description of Hillary Clinton. >>>> >>>> Well, no one can argue with that. Hillary might actually make a decent >>>> president, but she's a *really* bad person. >>>> >>>> >>> You don't want a "nice girl", you want an "iron bitch". >>> >>> ...speak softly, carry a big stick, and know how to use it. >> >> I don't want a lying, "iron bitch." I want someone who upholds the >> Constitution instead of trampling it under foot. > > Good luck wit dat dese days. > More ebonics from the racist Chris Ahlstrom.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 19:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0u9kp$fc7$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #329564 |
"owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote in message news:dfshvn9g.av@rooftop.invalid... > Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >> >> >> Good luck wit dat dese days. > > More ebonics from the racist Chris Ahlstrom. > LOL. You see, when someone else does this sort of thing they're racist. But when he does it then it's so incredibly funny. -- "Knowing 'Word or Excel' is a hindrance." <KLJcr.103621$4c4.97437@news.usenetserver.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-30 01:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sdne7.a3f@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #329590 |
Ezekiel <zeke@nosuchemail.com> wrote: > > "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote in message > news:dfshvn9g.av@rooftop.invalid... >> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Good luck wit dat dese days. >> >> More ebonics from the racist Chris Ahlstrom. >> > > LOL. > > You see, when someone else does this sort of thing they're racist. But when > he does it then it's so incredibly funny. > Ahlstrom's favorite racist reading material: http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2011-12-05-Cover.jpg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 20:04 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <QfydnQ3ZbI-3Ta_LnZ2dnUU7-IudnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #329619 |
On 10/29/15 19:32, owl wrote: > Ezekiel<zeke@nosuchemail.com> wrote: >> >> "owl"<owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote in message >> news:dfshvn9g.av@rooftop.invalid... >>> Chris Ahlstrom<OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Good luck wit dat dese days. >>> >>> More ebonics from the racist Chris Ahlstrom. >>> >> >> LOL. >> >> You see, when someone else does this sort of thing they're racist. But when >> he does it then it's so incredibly funny. >> > > Ahlstrom's favorite racist reading material: > http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2011-12-05-Cover.jpg > BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA!!!! -- When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the bottom, and have a longer blanket."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-30 10:06 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0vtd2$b7i$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #329619 |
"owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote in message news:sdne7.a3f@rooftop.invalid... > Ezekiel <zeke@nosuchemail.com> wrote: >> >> "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote in message >> news:dfshvn9g.av@rooftop.invalid... >>> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Good luck wit dat dese days. >>> >>> More ebonics from the racist Chris Ahlstrom. >>> >> >> LOL. >> >> You see, when someone else does this sort of thing they're racist. But >> when >> he does it then it's so incredibly funny. >> > > Ahlstrom's favorite racist reading material: > http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2011-12-05-Cover.jpg > LOL - It's "Mad Magazine" and little beaver just "loves" Mad Magazine. With a magazine cover like that it's no surprise. I bet he has that issue somewhere in his collection. -- "Another one who seems to think an MD5 sum is an MD5 hash" Chris Ahlstrom - trying hard to be technical Message-ID: <ku2h12$lr3$1@dont-email.me> 9 Aug 2013
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marti van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-31 11:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n1257l$f0k$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #329557 |
Op 29-10-15 om 21:19 schreef Chris Ahlstrom: > ronb wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:23:47 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >> >>> On 2015-10-29, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> Rockinghorse Winnner wrote: >>>> >>>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Why? He's an insulting, arrogant, rich bastard who cares only about >>>>>> himself. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you. I finally found a *PERFECT* description of Hillary Clinton. >>>> >>>> Well, no one can argue with that. Hillary might actually make a decent >>>> president, but she's a *really* bad person. >>>> >>>> >>> You don't want a "nice girl", you want an "iron bitch". >>> >>> ...speak softly, carry a big stick, and know how to use it. >> >> I don't want a lying, "iron bitch." I want someone who upholds the >> Constitution instead of trampling it under foot. > > Good luck wit dat dese days. > I have *never* seen a conservative Christian dropping LGBT from a high building so far ... Just saying... -- Marti van Lin Devuan GNU/Linux Debian (Jessie) with System V Init
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-31 07:32 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n128pb$snh$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #329907 |
Marti van Lin wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > Op 29-10-15 om 21:19 schreef Chris Ahlstrom: > >> ronb wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:23:47 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-10-29, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> Rockinghorse Winnner wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why? He's an insulting, arrogant, rich bastard who cares only about >>>>>>> himself. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you. I finally found a *PERFECT* description of Hillary Clinton. >>>>> >>>>> Well, no one can argue with that. Hillary might actually make a decent >>>>> president, but she's a *really* bad person. >>>>> >>>> You don't want a "nice girl", you want an "iron bitch". >>>> >>>> ...speak softly, carry a big stick, and know how to use it. >>> >>> I don't want a lying, "iron bitch." I want someone who upholds the >>> Constitution instead of trampling it under foot. >> >> Good luck wit dat dese days. >> > I have *never* seen a conservative Christian dropping LGBT from a high > building so far ... Just saying... Oh, defenestration is a fine tradition with Christians. "The defenestration of Prague", for example. For what its worth, history is *full* of egregious acts committed by just about every denomination you can think of. Is man good? I don't think so. -- Bridge ahead. Pay troll.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 15:31 -0600 |
| Subject | You got that right! |
| Message-ID | <FJCdnYiXrPCkDa_LnZ2dnUU7-emdnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #329438 |
On 10/29/15 09:43, ronb wrote: > On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:23:47 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: > >> On 2015-10-29, chrisv<chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> Rockinghorse Winnner wrote: >>> >>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Why? He's an insulting, arrogant, rich bastard who cares only about >>>>> himself. >>>> >>>> Thank you. I finally found a *PERFECT* description of Hillary Clinton. >>> >>> Well, no one can argue with that. Hillary might actually make a decent >>> president, but she's a *really* bad person. >>> >>> >> You don't want a "nice girl", you want an "iron bitch". >> >> ...speak softly, carry a big stick, and know how to use it. > > I don't want a lying, "iron bitch." I want someone who upholds the > Constitution instead of trampling it under foot. > -- When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the bottom, and have a longer blanket."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 12:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0tgr4$4fd$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #329405 |
On 2015-10-29 10:31 AM, chrisv wrote: > Rockinghorse Winnner wrote: > >> Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>> >>> Why? He's an insulting, arrogant, rich bastard >>> who cares only about himself. >> >> Thank you. I finally found a *PERFECT* description of Hillary Clinton. > > Well, no one can argue with that. Hillary might actually make a > decent president, but she's a *really* bad person. I hear that Hillary runs on the Linux kernel. -- Charmed Tuna
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 12:24 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <1atpyq0j6yshp$.uhhuuwtki4h1$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #329455 |
On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 12:19:54 -0400, Charmed Tuna wrote: > On 2015-10-29 10:31 AM, chrisv wrote: >> Rockinghorse Winnner wrote: >> >>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>>> >>>> Why? He's an insulting, arrogant, rich bastard >>>> who cares only about himself. >>> >>> Thank you. I finally found a *PERFECT* description of Hillary Clinton. >> >> Well, no one can argue with that. Hillary might actually make a >> decent president, but she's a *really* bad person. > > I hear that Hillary runs on the Linux kernel. She's a liar who's only interest is lining her own pocket. Also the number of people associated with the Clinton's who have disappeared under "interesting" circumstances is troubling. On another note, I watched the Republican debate last night which was run by MSNBC, aka the Hillary / Obama Channel, and it was so obvious how biased the media is against the Republicans. The questioning last night revealed that extreme bias. Compare it to the questioning in the Democratic debate where Hillary was barely questioned on her email / Benghazi problems. It's getting sickening how the mainstream media is in bed with the Democrats. Last night was confirmation of that for sure. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 09:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D25797B1.61ED7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #329457 |
On 10/29/15, 9:24 AM, in article 1atpyq0j6yshp$.uhhuuwtki4h1$.dlg@40tude.net, "Big Fish in a Small Crotch" <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: > On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 12:19:54 -0400, Charmed Tuna wrote: > >> On 2015-10-29 10:31 AM, chrisv wrote: >>> Rockinghorse Winnner wrote: >>> >>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Why? He's an insulting, arrogant, rich bastard >>>>> who cares only about himself. >>>> >>>> Thank you. I finally found a *PERFECT* description of Hillary Clinton. >>> >>> Well, no one can argue with that. Hillary might actually make a >>> decent president, but she's a *really* bad person. >> >> I hear that Hillary runs on the Linux kernel. > > She's a liar who's only interest is lining her own pocket. > Also the number of people associated with the Clinton's who have > disappeared under "interesting" circumstances is troubling. > > On another note, I watched the Republican debate last night which was run > by MSNBC, aka the Hillary / Obama Channel, and it was so obvious how biased > the media is against the Republicans. > > The questioning last night revealed that extreme bias. > Compare it to the questioning in the Democratic debate where Hillary was > barely questioned on her email / Benghazi problems. I have not watched the debate yet. How many questions were there about Bush's email problems? I am going to guess: zero. As far a Benghazi: seven investigations and no wrong doing found. What do you ask her about: how does she feel about the Republican witch hunt pushed by political nonsense? Um, she thinks it is silly but cannot stop it. What else is she supposed to say? It is a non-issue. > It's getting sickening how the mainstream media is in bed with the > Democrats. Yet I bet you do not even know about Bush's email issues or Carson's history with violence. > Last night was confirmation of that for sure. > -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 12:32 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0thip$4fd$10@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #329457 |
On 2015-10-29 12:24 PM, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: > On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 12:19:54 -0400, Charmed Tuna wrote: > >> On 2015-10-29 10:31 AM, chrisv wrote: >>> Rockinghorse Winnner wrote: >>> >>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Why? He's an insulting, arrogant, rich bastard >>>>> who cares only about himself. >>>> >>>> Thank you. I finally found a *PERFECT* description of Hillary Clinton. >>> >>> Well, no one can argue with that. Hillary might actually make a >>> decent president, but she's a *really* bad person. >> >> I hear that Hillary runs on the Linux kernel. > > She's a liar who's only interest is lining her own pocket. > Also the number of people associated with the Clinton's who have > disappeared under "interesting" circumstances is troubling. > > On another note, I watched the Republican debate last night which was run > by MSNBC, aka the Hillary / Obama Channel, and it was so obvious how biased > the media is against the Republicans. > > The questioning last night revealed that extreme bias. > Compare it to the questioning in the Democratic debate where Hillary was > barely questioned on her email / Benghazi problems. > > It's getting sickening how the mainstream media is in bed with the > Democrats. > Last night was confirmation of that for sure. I heard about it but didn't watch. I imagine that clips of it will be everywhere on the web if they aren't already. -- Charmed Tuna
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web