Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #451234 > unrolled thread
| Started by | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-12 12:38 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-05-13 05:17 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 527 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-12 12:38 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-12 14:35 +0000
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-13 00:48 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-12 19:02 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-13 04:28 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-12 21:42 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-12 22:52 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-13 16:58 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-13 10:13 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-13 18:22 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-13 11:28 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 13:33 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-13 13:43 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 14:16 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-13 16:48 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 17:59 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 18:33 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-13 19:50 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 20:40 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-13 21:49 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 22:46 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 10:15 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 11:15 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 11:27 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 18:30 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 13:09 -0700
Does anyone here know of a proud bot owner who'd... Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-14 13:36 -0700
Re: Does anyone here know of a proud bot owner who'd... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 14:13 -0700
Re: Does anyone here know of a proud bot owner who'd... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 14:45 -0700
Re: Does anyone here know of a proud bot owner who'd... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 14:43 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 14:42 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 15:22 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 15:41 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 16:54 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 17:00 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 19:53 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 20:04 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 20:22 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 20:34 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 20:37 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 20:50 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 20:56 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 23:24 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 21:00 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 21:18 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:01 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 11:25 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:58 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 12:15 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 13:10 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 13:47 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 13:59 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 14:08 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 14:30 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 15:48 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 16:17 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 16:26 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 17:38 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 20:14 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 16:18 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 16:43 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 16:50 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 17:22 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 17:26 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 17:36 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 18:05 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 20:55 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-13 20:48 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-13 14:06 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-15 18:41 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:58 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-15 19:31 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 12:08 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-15 19:54 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 13:07 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 13:44 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 13:43 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-15 21:33 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 14:36 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-15 21:53 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 14:56 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-16 00:49 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 17:59 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-16 01:47 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 18:52 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-16 02:05 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 19:09 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 01:10 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 19:11 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 19:07 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 19:06 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-16 23:20 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-16 19:47 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-17 05:45 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 06:02 +0000
Re: Observations Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-17 09:01 -0400
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 07:14 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-17 15:16 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 08:46 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-17 16:26 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 09:42 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 10:21 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 09:57 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 10:26 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 10:33 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 11:08 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 14:07 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 14:14 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 14:45 -0700
Re: Observations chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-17 11:57 -0500
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 10:22 -0700
Re: Observations Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-17 13:44 -0400
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 10:52 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-17 18:33 +0000
Re: Observations chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-17 14:26 -0500
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 14:13 -0700
Re: Observations Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-17 16:43 -0400
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 14:44 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 14:09 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 14:16 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 14:46 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-17 22:29 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 15:40 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 12:53 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 14:36 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 15:30 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 15:42 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-17 23:14 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 17:07 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-18 00:39 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 18:02 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-18 01:17 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 18:30 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 11:57 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 12:52 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 14:45 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 15:39 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 18:27 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 19:21 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 19:49 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 20:08 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 20:17 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 20:25 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 20:37 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 20:53 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 21:10 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 21:22 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 21:31 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 12:04 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 13:03 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 13:12 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 13:34 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 13:50 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 14:02 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 15:37 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 15:47 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 15:50 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 17:04 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 17:53 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 18:29 -0700
Re: Observations Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-19 01:33 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 18:39 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 19:12 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 20:13 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 23:03 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 08:16 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-19 08:28 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 08:47 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-19 08:50 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 09:00 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-19 09:03 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 09:25 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-19 09:27 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 09:32 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 17:39 -0700
Re: Observations chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 07:16 -0500
Re: Observations Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-21 09:20 -0400
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 07:23 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 08:41 -0700
Re: Observations chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-22 08:22 -0500
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-21 09:31 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 09:59 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 11:23 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-21 19:28 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 14:39 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 20:21 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 00:31 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 09:09 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 09:47 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 10:04 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 10:17 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 10:29 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 10:42 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 10:38 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 10:58 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 11:05 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 11:36 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 11:44 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 12:32 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 12:36 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 12:44 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 12:48 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 13:20 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 13:31 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 14:36 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 15:04 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 15:23 -0700
Don't expect a good response. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-22 15:12 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 15:53 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 16:46 -0700
innerText Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-22 16:59 -0700
Re: innerText Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 17:39 -0700
Re: innerText Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 18:06 -0700
Re: innerText Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-23 01:18 +0000
Re: innerText Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 18:21 -0700
Re: innerText Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 18:32 -0700
Re: innerText Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 18:32 -0700
Re: innerText Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 18:49 -0700
Re: innerText RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 20:09 +0000
Why ? What's the goal ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-22 18:46 -0700
Re: Why ? What's the goal ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 19:10 -0700
Re: Why ? What's the goal ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 19:30 -0700
Re: Why ? What's the goal ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 19:28 -0700
Re: Why ? What's the goal ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 20:37 -0700
Re: innerText Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 17:46 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 18:05 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 19:13 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 19:31 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 07:45 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 08:43 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 09:12 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 09:24 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 09:49 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 12:34 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 12:56 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 13:34 -0700
Tables Within Tables. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-23 13:56 -0700
Re: Tables Within Tables. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 14:10 -0700
If not a .CSV file, then what ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-23 14:47 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 15:19 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 17:59 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 19:14 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 19:42 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 12:23 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> - 2018-05-24 14:42 -0500
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 13:13 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> - 2018-05-25 09:21 -0500
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:13 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 09:22 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> - 2018-05-25 12:08 -0500
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 10:20 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 10:28 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 10:38 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 10:49 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 10:56 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 20:41 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 21:08 -0700
Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-25 11:22 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 11:50 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 11:55 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 12:45 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 14:12 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 14:42 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 15:23 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 15:39 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 16:12 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 18:25 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 18:56 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-26 02:24 +0000
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 19:35 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 19:46 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 19:51 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 19:05 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 15:26 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 16:13 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 18:42 -0700
Michael's PlanetKilling carbon dioxide. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-26 02:27 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 15:32 -0700
"trolling and flooding" your way to freedom, divorce. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-26 02:12 -0700
Re: "trolling and flooding" your way to freedom, divorce. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 02:36 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 12:01 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 11:13 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 09:14 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:17 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 09:31 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:43 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 09:53 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 10:18 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 09:54 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 20:40 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 10:11 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 20:39 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> - 2018-05-25 12:09 -0500
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 10:16 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 10:24 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 10:43 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 10:50 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 14:15 -0700
Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-26 02:44 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 09:53 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 10:15 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 11:48 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 11:58 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 12:06 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 12:13 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 12:41 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 20:21 +0000
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 14:05 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 14:46 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 16:04 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 16:27 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 16:31 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 16:40 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 16:58 -0700
Tech question for Carroll Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 17:14 -0700
Re: Tech question for Carroll Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 12:27 -0700
Re: Tech question for Carroll Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 12:50 -0700
Re: Tech question for Carroll Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-29 08:52 -0700
Re: Tech question for Carroll Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 09:18 -0700
Re: Tech question for Carroll Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-29 20:41 +0000
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 16:53 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 17:21 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 17:45 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 22:59 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 17:35 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 21:26 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 09:28 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:42 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 10:33 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 11:31 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 10:42 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 11:04 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 11:19 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 11:43 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 11:59 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 12:51 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 12:56 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:06 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 13:12 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:36 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 14:11 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 14:56 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 15:59 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 16:05 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 16:27 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 17:01 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 20:12 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 21:22 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 06:41 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 18:12 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-28 19:06 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 11:48 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 11:55 -0700
Tech question for Carroll Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-29 14:41 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-29 12:12 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:13 -0700
Tech question for Carroll Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-29 14:40 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:36 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 19:28 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 13:02 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:12 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 13:27 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:48 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:37 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 12:18 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 15:56 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 14:23 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 14:48 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 15:30 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 17:43 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 20:03 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 10:21 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 13:09 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 14:00 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 16:51 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 20:17 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 20:53 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 21:30 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 21:47 -0700
The head shrinker. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-24 22:13 -0700
Re: The head shrinker. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 22:18 -0700
Re: The head shrinker. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 22:22 -0700
Re: The head shrinker. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 22:24 -0700
"kinder" is German for "children". Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-24 22:39 -0700
Re: "kinder" is German for "children". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 23:26 -0700
Re: "kinder" is German for "children". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 08:58 -0700
Re: "kinder" is German for "children". quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> - 2018-05-25 09:15 -0500
Re: "kinder" is German for "children". Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 07:35 -0700
Re: "kinder" is German for "children". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 08:55 -0700
Re: "kinder" is German for "children". Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 09:24 -0700
Re: The head shrinker. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 22:19 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 22:04 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 22:10 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 22:16 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 22:22 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 22:25 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 20:19 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 20:25 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 21:06 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 23:26 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 02:35 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 13:16 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 15:30 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 15:44 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 16:32 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 18:53 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 19:28 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 19:42 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 19:57 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 20:01 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 20:10 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 20:13 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 20:37 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 20:44 -0700
Ping Carroll: Why all the trolling? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 19:03 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-23 07:15 -0500
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 07:16 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 07:19 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 07:48 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-23 07:45 -0400
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 04:58 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 12:48 +0000
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 06:17 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 07:19 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 07:35 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 07:53 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 08:17 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 08:52 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 09:22 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 09:34 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 10:01 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 12:36 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 13:28 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 13:39 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 10:09 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 09:38 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 12:37 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 13:01 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 14:52 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 10:37 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 17:13 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 17:14 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 10:21 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-19 10:25 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 18:24 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 18:25 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 08:48 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 09:12 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 09:09 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 09:16 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 09:37 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 10:19 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-17 18:55 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 14:12 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-17 22:09 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 15:18 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-17 22:41 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 15:44 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-17 23:08 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 16:19 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-17 23:29 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 17:10 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 12:34 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 14:34 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 15:23 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 15:40 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 16:39 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 18:20 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 19:06 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 19:44 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 20:02 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 20:13 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 20:55 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 21:15 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 22:19 -0700
Re: Observations Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-16 07:38 -0400
Re: Observations chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-16 07:53 -0500
Re: Observations Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-16 09:00 -0400
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-16 07:14 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-16 07:03 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-16 07:16 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 10:45 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-16 11:54 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 12:04 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 12:33 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 12:03 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-16 12:24 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 12:29 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 08:15 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 08:38 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 08:47 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 09:08 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 08:15 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 09:10 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-12 17:20 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 10:34 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-12 17:46 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 11:02 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-13 04:34 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 10:17 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-13 18:26 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 12:49 -0700
Re: Observations "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-13 19:26 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-13 12:34 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 12:48 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 12:51 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 12:52 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 13:39 -0700
Re: Observations "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-13 21:03 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 14:11 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 17:16 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 13:49 -0700
Re: Observations "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-12 19:41 +0000
Re: Observations Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-12 16:06 -0400
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-12 13:23 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-12 20:52 +0000
Re: Observations "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-12 21:12 +0000
Re: Observations Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-05-12 23:52 +0200
Re: Observations Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-12 21:04 -0400
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-12 18:38 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-12 19:03 -0700
Re: Observations chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-14 07:05 -0500
Re: Observations Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-05-14 23:48 +0200
Re: Observations chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-15 09:27 -0500
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 07:43 -0700
Wintroll predictions chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-22 08:06 -0500
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-13 05:17 +0000
Page 25 of 27 — ← Prev page 1 … 23 24 [25] 26 27 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 07:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fm2sp9F47u7U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #451506 |
On 5/16/18 4:38 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote: > On Wed, 16 May 2018 01:47:29 +0000 (UTC), owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> > wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 5/15/18 5:49 PM, owl wrote: >>> ... >>>>> In >>>>> short they are made for very different purposes. >>>>> >>>> >>>> They are both spreadsheets. They are made for the same purpose. >>> >>> They are both spreadsheets, sure, but they are each made with a very >>> different focus in terms of use cases. >>> >>> >> >> How so? > > Translating Snittalk: > > "I am wrong but I am still right." > If you disagree that is fine... but TRY to show some thought and not just whining. Really, it makes conversations flow better. For the record, here was my actual reply: ----- Some of the things we have been discussing and have in the past. sc is made more for scripting and "heftier" number crunching, and to run "light" on a system. Numbers is made more for ease of use, flexibility in layout, integration with other media (images and text boxes, as examples), and for simple formatting. As examples of the types of things Numbers is designed for, you can look at the templates. Was going to list them here but easier to just show a video. :) <https://youtu.be/rT6R_sHnyYM> Or the real world example I used with you before: <https://youtu.be/VzVKlou6byU> -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 10:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <24969dfc-ff58-4cff-8810-f97d5cd94022@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451515 |
On Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 8:16:13 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 5/16/18 4:38 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote: > > On Wed, 16 May 2018 01:47:29 +0000 (UTC), owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> > > wrote: > > > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>> On 5/15/18 5:49 PM, owl wrote: > >>> ... > >>>>> In > >>>>> short they are made for very different purposes. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> They are both spreadsheets. They are made for the same purpose. > >>> > >>> They are both spreadsheets, sure, but they are each made with a very > >>> different focus in terms of use cases. > >>> > >>> > >> > >> How so? > > > > Translating Snittalk: > > > > "I am wrong but I am still right." > > > If you disagree that is fine... but TRY to show some thought and not > just whining. Whining, or not, that's definitely your MO.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 11:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fm3d2hF7t70U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #451526 |
On 5/16/18 10:45 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 8:16:13 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 5/16/18 4:38 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote: >>> On Wed, 16 May 2018 01:47:29 +0000 (UTC), owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 5/15/18 5:49 PM, owl wrote: >>>>> ... >>>>>>> In >>>>>>> short they are made for very different purposes. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> They are both spreadsheets. They are made for the same purpose. >>>>> >>>>> They are both spreadsheets, sure, but they are each made with a very >>>>> different focus in terms of use cases. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> How so? >>> >>> Translating Snittalk: >>> >>> "I am wrong but I am still right." >>> >> If you disagree that is fine... but TRY to show some thought and not >> just whining. Really, it makes conversations flow better. For the >> record, here was my actual reply: >> >> ----- >> >> Some of the things we have been discussing and have in the past. sc >> is made more for scripting and "heftier" number crunching, and to run >> "light" on a system. Numbers is made more for ease of use, >> flexibility in layout, integration with other media (images and text >> boxes, as examples), and for simple formatting. >> >> As examples of the types of things Numbers is designed for, you can >> look at the templates. Was going to list them here but easier to just >> show a video. :) >> >> <https://youtu.be/rT6R_sHnyYM> >> >> Or the real world example I used with you before: >> >> <https://youtu.be/VzVKlou6byU> > > Whining, or not, that's definitely your MO. > To make a point and back it with evidence merely to have you snip it and share your fantasies about me... sure, except it is not only our MOs, it is what you and I did here. I focus on tech. You focus on me. Not much either of us can do to change the other. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 12:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ec0c688b-2e29-4163-a622-2b092767f8f9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451529 |
On Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 11:54:12 AM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 5/16/18 10:45 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 8:16:13 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 5/16/18 4:38 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote: > >>> On Wed, 16 May 2018 01:47:29 +0000 (UTC), owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>>> On 5/15/18 5:49 PM, owl wrote: > >>>>> ... > >>>>>>> In > >>>>>>> short they are made for very different purposes. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> They are both spreadsheets. They are made for the same purpose. > >>>>> > >>>>> They are both spreadsheets, sure, but they are each made with a very > >>>>> different focus in terms of use cases. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> How so? > >>> > >>> Translating Snittalk: > >>> > >>> "I am wrong but I am still right." > >>> > >> If you disagree that is fine... but TRY to show some thought and not > >> just whining. Really, it makes conversations flow better. For the > >> record, here was my actual reply: > >> > >> ----- > >> > >> Some of the things we have been discussing and have in the past. sc > >> is made more for scripting and "heftier" number crunching, and to run > >> "light" on a system. Numbers is made more for ease of use, > >> flexibility in layout, integration with other media (images and text > >> boxes, as examples), and for simple formatting. > >> > >> As examples of the types of things Numbers is designed for, you can > >> look at the templates. Was going to list them here but easier to just > >> show a video. :) > >> > >> <https://youtu.be/rT6R_sHnyYM> > >> > >> Or the real world example I used with you before: > >> > >> <https://youtu.be/VzVKlou6byU> > > > > Whining, or not, that's definitely your MO. > > > To make a point and back it with evidence merely to have you snip it and > share your fantasies about me... sure, except it is not only our MOs, it > is what you and I did here. > > I focus on tech. You focus on me. Not much either of us can do to change > the other. > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> Both F. Russell and Oppenheimer had their shortfalls and their awkward moments. One played it as supernatural and didn't do anything too shocking that could not be backed with peer reviews. F. Russell's computer has more hard drives than David Empson's. F. Russell wins. David Empson loses. Turns out David Empson's persistent referencing of F. Russell met his own definition of trolling, so he accused F. Russell of making that up. You never take responsibility for your own actions. Quotes that are easily found in a search. David Empson can only think from the viewpoint of a sociopath. -- I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened! http://www.5z8.info/racist-raps_r6r3wf_best-russian-sites-for-bootleg-everything Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 12:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2fadc56a-d192-465d-aa26-8077cde66a85@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451531 |
On Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 12:04:22 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 11:54:12 AM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > > On 5/16/18 10:45 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > On Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 8:16:13 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > >> On 5/16/18 4:38 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote: > > >>> On Wed, 16 May 2018 01:47:29 +0000 (UTC), owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > >>>>> On 5/15/18 5:49 PM, owl wrote: > > >>>>> ... > > >>>>>>> In > > >>>>>>> short they are made for very different purposes. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> They are both spreadsheets. They are made for the same purpose. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> They are both spreadsheets, sure, but they are each made with a very > > >>>>> different focus in terms of use cases. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> How so? > > >>> > > >>> Translating Snittalk: > > >>> > > >>> "I am wrong but I am still right." > > >>> > > >> If you disagree that is fine... but TRY to show some thought and not > > >> just whining. Really, it makes conversations flow better. For the > > >> record, here was my actual reply: > > >> > > >> ----- > > >> > > >> Some of the things we have been discussing and have in the past. sc > > >> is made more for scripting and "heftier" number crunching, and to run > > >> "light" on a system. Numbers is made more for ease of use, > > >> flexibility in layout, integration with other media (images and text > > >> boxes, as examples), and for simple formatting. > > >> > > >> As examples of the types of things Numbers is designed for, you can > > >> look at the templates. Was going to list them here but easier to just > > >> show a video. :) > > >> > > >> <https://youtu.be/rT6R_sHnyYM> > > >> > > >> Or the real world example I used with you before: > > >> > > >> <https://youtu.be/VzVKlou6byU> > > > > > > Whining, or not, that's definitely your MO. > > > > > To make a point and back it with evidence merely to have you snip it and > > share your fantasies about me... sure, except it is not only our MOs, it > > is what you and I did here. > > > > I focus on tech. You focus on me. Not much either of us can do to change > > the other. > > > > -- > > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> > > > > Both F. Russell and Oppenheimer had their shortfalls and their awkward moments. One played it as supernatural and didn't do anything too shocking that could not be backed with peer reviews. F. Russell's computer has more hard drives than David Empson's. F. Russell wins. David Empson loses. Turns out David Empson's persistent referencing of F. Russell met his own definition of trolling, so he accused F. Russell of making that up. You never take responsibility for your own actions. Quotes that are easily found in a search. David Empson can only think from the viewpoint of a sociopath. > > -- > I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened! > http://www.5z8.info/racist-raps_r6r3wf_best-russian-sites-for-bootleg-everything > Jonas Eklundh Communication Having to tolerate the use of Bash would just confuse the general user. The teller of untruths AKA God does it every time. Then the flood begins. Because the wimp just has to run to other groups to get the attention he's not getting here. Who *doesn't* know that this kind of codswallop is God's approach, not the modus operandi of RonB? It's all just nonsense... the flooding, the sock puppets, the writing of nonsense, the anger... the panties in a twist and eagerness to show how ashamed he is over being kicked from the playground for pissing in it again... all of it ;) -- What Every Entrepreneur Must Know!! http://prescottcomputerguy.com/screenflow Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 12:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9029cfde-44ba-4eda-8858-850621e232fa@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451526 |
On Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 11:45:20 AM UTC-6, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 8:16:13 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > On 5/16/18 4:38 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote: > > > On Wed, 16 May 2018 01:47:29 +0000 (UTC), owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > >>> On 5/15/18 5:49 PM, owl wrote: > > >>> ... > > >>>>> In > > >>>>> short they are made for very different purposes. > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> They are both spreadsheets. They are made for the same purpose. > > >>> > > >>> They are both spreadsheets, sure, but they are each made with a very > > >>> different focus in terms of use cases. > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> How so? > > > > > > Translating Snittalk: > > > > > > "I am wrong but I am still right." > > > > > If you disagree that is fine... but TRY to show some thought and not > > just whining. > > Whining, or not, that's definitely your MO. <https://streamable.com/cqy3r> But I didn't ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 12:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fm3errF8cirU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #451530 |
On 5/16/18 12:03 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 11:45:20 AM UTC-6, Steve Carroll wrote: >> On Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 8:16:13 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>> On 5/16/18 4:38 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote: >>>> On Wed, 16 May 2018 01:47:29 +0000 (UTC), owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 5/15/18 5:49 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>> ... >>>>>>>> In >>>>>>>> short they are made for very different purposes. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They are both spreadsheets. They are made for the same purpose. >>>>>> >>>>>> They are both spreadsheets, sure, but they are each made with a very >>>>>> different focus in terms of use cases. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> How so? >>>> >>>> Translating Snittalk: >>>> >>>> "I am wrong but I am still right." >>>> >>> If you disagree that is fine... but TRY to show some thought and not >>> just whining. >> >> Whining, or not, that's definitely your MO. > > <https://streamable.com/cqy3r> > > But I didn't ;) > Link to the post you snipped the tech content away and replied with your usual focus on me: <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/2FxzZ-3FTys/RKSxoKmiCQAJ> OR <http://bit.ly/2KqMLE0> And now this has gone from you snipping tech info to babble about me, to me calling you out on it, to you pushing an absurd meta-debate where you deny it. Why the hell do you do this shit? And I guess it is just as fair to ask: why the hell do I give you attention over such nonsense trolling? Why not just focus on tech. Here, to get back to the answer I gave to Owl's question: ----- Some of the things we have been discussing and have in the past. sc is made more for scripting and "heftier" number crunching, and to run "light" on a system. Numbers is made more for ease of use, flexibility in layout, integration with other media (images and text boxes, as examples), and for simple formatting. As examples of the types of things Numbers is designed for, you can look at the templates. Was going to list them here but easier to just show a video. :) <https://youtu.be/rT6R_sHnyYM> Or the real world example I used with you before: <https://youtu.be/VzVKlou6byU> ----- Do you have any comment about the tech side of the conversation or are you just going to keep obsessing over me? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 12:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fb45514e-318d-4618-bc4f-6e3b923c462f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451532 |
On Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 12:24:47 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 5/16/18 12:03 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 11:45:20 AM UTC-6, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> On Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 8:16:13 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>> On 5/16/18 4:38 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote: > >>>> On Wed, 16 May 2018 01:47:29 +0000 (UTC), owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>>>> On 5/15/18 5:49 PM, owl wrote: > >>>>>> ... > >>>>>>>> In > >>>>>>>> short they are made for very different purposes. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> They are both spreadsheets. They are made for the same purpose. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> They are both spreadsheets, sure, but they are each made with a very > >>>>>> different focus in terms of use cases. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> How so? > >>>> > >>>> Translating Snittalk: > >>>> > >>>> "I am wrong but I am still right." > >>>> > >>> If you disagree that is fine... but TRY to show some thought and not > >>> just whining. > >> > >> Whining, or not, that's definitely your MO. > > > > <https://streamable.com/cqy3r> > > > > But I didn't ;) > > > Link to the post you snipped the tech content away and replied with your > usual focus on me: > > <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/2FxzZ-3FTys/RKSxoKmiCQAJ> > OR <http://bit.ly/2KqMLE0> > > And now this has gone from you snipping tech info to babble about me, to > me calling you out on it, to you pushing an absurd meta-debate where you > deny it. > > Why the hell do you do this shit? > > And I guess it is just as fair to ask: why the hell do I give you > attention over such nonsense trolling? > > Why not just focus on tech. Here, to get back to the answer I gave to > Owl's question: > > ----- > > Some of the things we have been discussing and have in the past. sc is > made more for scripting and "heftier" number crunching, and to run > "light" on a system. Numbers is made more for ease of use, flexibility > in layout, integration with other media (images and text boxes, as > examples), and for simple formatting. > > As examples of the types of things Numbers is designed for, you can look > at the templates. Was going to list them here but easier to just show a > video. :) > > <https://youtu.be/rT6R_sHnyYM> > > Or the real world example I used with you before: > > <https://youtu.be/VzVKlou6byU> > > ----- > > Do you have any comment about the tech side of the conversation or are > you just going to keep obsessing over me? > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> You do realize that the massive floods ending up in multiple groups started out in COLA, right? It was Peter the Klöwn who flooded Melzzzzz's site millions of times and denied it. What do you get out of lying, Peter the Klöwn? Just look at your videos and look at mine, there is nothing for us to learn from a fool like Peter the Klöwn. But whatever, let him keep making an imbecile of himself. He can make another sock to pat himself on the back. Peter the Klöwn asked to be rated according to objective trolling criteria, which Melzzzzz indulged. Richard Stallman is a false advocate's biggest fear. His "technical support talents" diverted his attention from an extension he needs that does exist on Red Hat. The only thing malfunctioning here is Peter the Klöwn. I am an obsessed advocate of Red Hat, because that's where all the compelling breakthroughs are happening. -- Puppy Videos https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100012978552519 Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-17 08:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c2ba1edf-4871-4520-b58e-eee21313ca24@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451532 |
On Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 1:24:47 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 5/16/18 12:03 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 11:45:20 AM UTC-6, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> On Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 8:16:13 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>> On 5/16/18 4:38 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote: > >>>> On Wed, 16 May 2018 01:47:29 +0000 (UTC), owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>>>> On 5/15/18 5:49 PM, owl wrote: > >>>>>> ... > >>>>>>>> In > >>>>>>>> short they are made for very different purposes. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> They are both spreadsheets. They are made for the same purpose. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> They are both spreadsheets, sure, but they are each made with a very > >>>>>> different focus in terms of use cases. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> How so? > >>>> > >>>> Translating Snittalk: > >>>> > >>>> "I am wrong but I am still right." > >>>> > >>> If you disagree that is fine... but TRY to show some thought and not > >>> just whining. > >> > >> Whining, or not, that's definitely your MO. > > > > <https://streamable.com/cqy3r> > > > > But I didn't ;) > > > Link to the post ... that also contains irrelevant crap I don't care about and didn't respond to. Who *hasn't* noticed your MO of being "right"? > Why the hell do you do this shit? At least I still respond to you, most people don't even bother ;) > And I guess it is just as fair to ask: why the hell do I give you > attention over such nonsense trolling? 'Cuz you like to play 'victim', obviously. > Why not just focus on tech. LOL! Here's the reality on that... That screencast proves I focus on doing tech, unlike you, who talks about it here and there to facilitate trolling. Owl focuses on tech by doing, not just talking. Your use of tech is limited, for the most part, to the use of things that are pre-configured for you. This is why you just don't 'get' the use of the CLI in the hands of a person capable of using it well. You do have AppleScript to get you past some of that limitation so why don't you put it to use? The reason is it would take "actual" learning. Owl said that Numbers can't interact with external sheets, which seems to be true. But isn't there a way around that limitation? Couldn't you grab data from a GoogleSheet and bring it into Numbers using AppleScript? Seems like a worthwhile thing that might in come in handy to know. To me (and to owl) focusing on tech also means doing it... which can be limited to the use of pre-configured solutions but they don't provide much of a learning experience (the other reason you claim to come here).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-17 08:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fm5luvFnam3U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #451577 |
On 5/17/18 8:15 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: ... >>> But I didn't ;) >>> >> Link to the post > > .... that also contains irrelevant crap I don't care about and didn't > respond to. Who *hasn't* noticed your MO of being "right"? OK, so we agree you think tech discussions are "irrelevant crap". ----- Some of the things we have been discussing and have in the past. sc is made more for scripting and "heftier" number crunching, and to run "light" on a system. Numbers is made more for ease of use, flexibility in layout, integration with other media (images and text boxes, as examples), and for simple formatting. As examples of the types of things Numbers is designed for, you can look at the templates. Was going to list them here but easier to just show a video. :) <https://youtu.be/rT6R_sHnyYM> Or the real world example I used with you before: <https://youtu.be/VzVKlou6byU> ----- And then as you spew nonsense about me you, of course, blame me. That is what you do: blame me for EVERYTHING wrong in your life, even your own bad habits. ... >> Why not just focus on tech. > > LOL! Here's the reality on that... > > That screencast proves I focus on doing tech, To automate flooding of COLA (and other groups). But above you showed you consider discussions of tech to be "irrelevant crap". Then you jump into trying to judge the value of different forms of focusing on tech, placing scripting / programming above other forms. Whatever. And you go back to your bragging about how you do things I do not. Guess what: my world does not revolve around you. You and I make different use of tech. Owl and I make different use of tech. I have NO issue with this. ... > Owl said that Numbers can't interact with external sheets, which > seems to be true. But isn't there a way around that limitation? > Couldn't you grab data from a GoogleSheet and bring it into > Numbers using AppleScript? Seems like a worthwhile thing that > might in come in handy to know. If that interests you then look into it. I think that would be awesome and MUCH better than your scripted trolling of COLA and other groups. > To me (and to owl) focusing > on tech also means doing it... which can be limited to the use of > pre-configured solutions but they don't provide much of a > learning experience (the other reason you claim to come here). Ah, you show no real understanding of what I do even as you obsess over me for over a decade of your life. What a shock! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-17 08:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8c4f2784-5f2c-4c73-af83-a7af6a70c58d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451580 |
On Thursday, May 17, 2018 at 9:38:11 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 5/17/18 8:15 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > ... > >>> But I didn't ;) > >>> > >> Link to the post > > > > .... that also contains irrelevant crap I don't care about and didn't > > respond to. Who *hasn't* noticed your MO of being "right"? > > OK, so we agree you think tech discussions are "irrelevant crap". When they are *your* discussions, usually ;) > >> Why not just focus on tech. > > > > LOL! Here's the reality on that... > > > > That screencast proves I focus on doing tech, > > To automate flooding of COLA (and other groups). But above you showed > you consider discussions of tech to be "irrelevant crap". Then you jump > into trying to judge the value of different forms of focusing on tech, > placing scripting / programming above other forms. Whatever. And you go > back to your bragging about how you do things I do not. > > Guess what: my world does not revolve around you. You, doing tech instead of just talking about it here and there to facilitate your trolling, has nothing to do with me; the only connection to me is that I'm the one pointing it out. But you can't *not* focus on me... of course, then you project that trait onto me, which is expected by you. Who *hasn't* seen this by you? > > Owl said that Numbers can't interact with external sheets, which > > seems to be true. But isn't there a way around that limitation? > > Couldn't you grab data from a GoogleSheet and bring it into > > Numbers using AppleScript? Seems like a worthwhile thing that > > might in come in handy to know. > > If that interests you then look into it. I already have, as I showed in a screencast. Owl does, I do, you talk. Who *hasn't* seen this? > > To me (and to owl) focusing > > on tech also means doing it... which can be limited to the use of > > pre-configured solutions but they don't provide much of a > > learning experience (the other reason you claim to come here). > > Ah, you show no real understanding of what I do LOL! Everyone has a "real understanding of what" you do, Snit, that you believe you've hidden it is where comedy lives ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-17 09:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fm5nneFnlnsU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #451582 |
On 5/17/18 8:47 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, May 17, 2018 at 9:38:11 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 5/17/18 8:15 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> ... >>>>> But I didn't ;) >>>>> >>>> Link to the post >>> >>> .... that also contains irrelevant crap I don't care about and didn't >>> respond to. Who *hasn't* noticed your MO of being "right"? >> >> OK, so we agree you think tech discussions are "irrelevant crap". > > When they are *your* discussions, usually ;) > >>>> Why not just focus on tech. >>> >>> LOL! Here's the reality on that... >>> >>> That screencast proves I focus on doing tech, >> >> To automate flooding of COLA (and other groups). But above you showed >> you consider discussions of tech to be "irrelevant crap". Then you jump >> into trying to judge the value of different forms of focusing on tech, >> placing scripting / programming above other forms. Whatever. And you go >> back to your bragging about how you do things I do not. >> >> Guess what: my world does not revolve around you. > > You, doing tech instead of just talking about it here and there to > facilitate your trolling, has nothing to do with me; the only > connection to me is that I'm the one pointing it out. But you > can't *not* focus on me... of course, then you project that > trait onto me, which is expected by you. Who *hasn't* seen > this by you? > >>> Owl said that Numbers can't interact with external sheets, which >>> seems to be true. But isn't there a way around that limitation? >>> Couldn't you grab data from a GoogleSheet and bring it into >>> Numbers using AppleScript? Seems like a worthwhile thing that >>> might in come in handy to know. >> >> If that interests you then look into it. > > I already have, as I showed in a screencast. Owl does, I do, you talk. > Who *hasn't* seen this? > >>> To me (and to owl) focusing >>> on tech also means doing it... which can be limited to the use of >>> pre-configured solutions but they don't provide much of a >>> learning experience (the other reason you claim to come here). >> >> Ah, you show no real understanding of what I do > > LOL! Everyone has a "real understanding of what" you do, Snit, > that you believe you've hidden it is where comedy lives ;) > My use of tech does not please you, and you do not even really understand it. OH SHIT! Wait. No. I really do not care. Not one whit. Heck, you ACTIVELY seek to misunderstand and misrepresent. But you try to twist that to be MY problem. You blame EVERYTHING wrong in your life on me. What a shock! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-12 08:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <cad84267-eaaa-4dea-8e26-c209a619e8d9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451234 |
On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 5:38:19 AM UTC-7, owl wrote: > After working with vim and sc under linux on the android, I have noticed > that, as counterintuitive as it might seem, editing and spreadsheet > tasks are actually much *easier* this way than they are with the usual > touch-screen interface to typical android apps of those types. All that > frustrating touch and hold (and usually try again several times), drag, > menu choice, etc., vs simple, precise keyboard navigation and short, > powerful commands for cutting, pasting, etc. Much more efficient this > way. I had tried a while back to use Excel on my phone. After about > 10 minutes, I wanted to throw the phone against a wall. By contrast, > SC, with its vi-like navigation, is a pleasure to use on the phone. > > Vim and SC are the obvious choices for effiency when you have a physical > keyboard, but it's not so obvious that they are also the most efficient > on a touch screen with a software keyboard. Pull up a background investigation on kushal bhattacharya and you will discover that he was in a correctional facility for a long time. The probes fail to go into that amount of specificity and court reports from his jurisdiction are private unless subpoenaed. Already moved on from that. Take it as you want! These morons get their kicks out of eliciting emotional responses to their crap, which is the very definition of a troll. kushal bhattacharya was once again a hypocrite by having the pretense to not engage Steven Petruzzellis by means of emphatically broadcasting 'goodbye forever!' and then assailing him again using another poster. How is failing synaptic connections tied to the intelligence of a turnip in any way going to lead to enlightened usenet conversation? What do you get out of lying, kushal bhattacharya? -- Puppy Videos! http://www.5z8.info/lemon-party-redux_v1o7pm_nakedgrandmas.jpg http://tinyurl.com/gsleb4p Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-12 09:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7b139a8a-d6be-42ef-b4f4-f2899acfb4d4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451234 |
On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 6:38:19 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: > After working with vim and sc under linux on the android, I have noticed > that, as counterintuitive as it might seem, editing and spreadsheet > tasks are actually much *easier* this way than they are with the usual > touch-screen interface to typical android apps of those types. All that > frustrating touch and hold (and usually try again several times), drag, > menu choice, etc., vs simple, precise keyboard navigation and short, > powerful commands for cutting, pasting, etc. Much more efficient this > way. I had tried a while back to use Excel on my phone. After about > 10 minutes, I wanted to throw the phone against a wall. By contrast, > SC, with its vi-like navigation, is a pleasure to use on the phone. > > Vim and SC are the obvious choices for effiency when you have a physical > keyboard, but it's not so obvious that they are also the most efficient > on a touch screen with a software keyboard. This almost makes me want to get ahold of an Android device ;) In an environment like that, is it possible to get direct access to something like a 'Google Sheet'?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-12 17:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <aib004ga.bho@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #451245 |
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 6:38:19 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: >> After working with vim and sc under linux on the android, I have noticed >> that, as counterintuitive as it might seem, editing and spreadsheet >> tasks are actually much *easier* this way than they are with the usual >> touch-screen interface to typical android apps of those types. All that >> frustrating touch and hold (and usually try again several times), drag, >> menu choice, etc., vs simple, precise keyboard navigation and short, >> powerful commands for cutting, pasting, etc. Much more efficient this >> way. I had tried a while back to use Excel on my phone. After about >> 10 minutes, I wanted to throw the phone against a wall. By contrast, >> SC, with its vi-like navigation, is a pleasure to use on the phone. >> >> Vim and SC are the obvious choices for effiency when you have a physical >> keyboard, but it's not so obvious that they are also the most efficient >> on a touch screen with a software keyboard. > > This almost makes me want to get ahold of an Android device ;) > In an environment like that, is it possible to get direct access > to something like a 'Google Sheet'? I've never tried that, but this looks promising: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vISRn5qFrkM Also, if you can get that sheet downloaded as csv, then you can import it directly into sc.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-12 10:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6df39e2d-6d95-426d-b529-d625cdee939f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451248 |
On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 11:20:23 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: > Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 6:38:19 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: > >> After working with vim and sc under linux on the android, I have noticed > >> that, as counterintuitive as it might seem, editing and spreadsheet > >> tasks are actually much *easier* this way than they are with the usual > >> touch-screen interface to typical android apps of those types. All that > >> frustrating touch and hold (and usually try again several times), drag, > >> menu choice, etc., vs simple, precise keyboard navigation and short, > >> powerful commands for cutting, pasting, etc. Much more efficient this > >> way. I had tried a while back to use Excel on my phone. After about > >> 10 minutes, I wanted to throw the phone against a wall. By contrast, > >> SC, with its vi-like navigation, is a pleasure to use on the phone. > >> > >> Vim and SC are the obvious choices for effiency when you have a physical > >> keyboard, but it's not so obvious that they are also the most efficient > >> on a touch screen with a software keyboard. > > > > This almost makes me want to get ahold of an Android device ;) > > In an environment like that, is it possible to get direct access > > to something like a 'Google Sheet'? > > I've never tried that, but this looks promising: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vISRn5qFrkM > > Also, if you can get that sheet downloaded as csv, then you can import > it directly into sc. I've never done it but GS does have .csv export
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-12 17:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <zb8083ga.huo3t@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #451249 |
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 11:20:23 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: >> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 6:38:19 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: >> >> After working with vim and sc under linux on the android, I have noticed >> >> that, as counterintuitive as it might seem, editing and spreadsheet >> >> tasks are actually much *easier* this way than they are with the usual >> >> touch-screen interface to typical android apps of those types. All that >> >> frustrating touch and hold (and usually try again several times), drag, >> >> menu choice, etc., vs simple, precise keyboard navigation and short, >> >> powerful commands for cutting, pasting, etc. Much more efficient this >> >> way. I had tried a while back to use Excel on my phone. After about >> >> 10 minutes, I wanted to throw the phone against a wall. By contrast, >> >> SC, with its vi-like navigation, is a pleasure to use on the phone. >> >> >> >> Vim and SC are the obvious choices for effiency when you have a physical >> >> keyboard, but it's not so obvious that they are also the most efficient >> >> on a touch screen with a software keyboard. >> > >> > This almost makes me want to get ahold of an Android device ;) >> > In an environment like that, is it possible to get direct access >> > to something like a 'Google Sheet'? >> >> I've never tried that, but this looks promising: >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vISRn5qFrkM >> >> Also, if you can get that sheet downloaded as csv, then you can import >> it directly into sc. > > I've never done it but GS does have .csv export Something else to consider: If you watch that guy's video, you'll that he has a python script that interacts with a google sheet. Since sc is able to use external commands, you could possibly have sc cell values sent to a google sheet by hitting a hotkey inside of sc. If you didn't want to bother with that, at the very least you should be able to interact with a google sheet from a command line script, and use vim as your script editor.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-12 11:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <53cb2df5-2e4d-41a7-9f6d-72022522fb15@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451251 |
On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 11:46:37 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: > Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 11:20:23 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: > >> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 6:38:19 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: > >> >> After working with vim and sc under linux on the android, I have noticed > >> >> that, as counterintuitive as it might seem, editing and spreadsheet > >> >> tasks are actually much *easier* this way than they are with the usual > >> >> touch-screen interface to typical android apps of those types. All that > >> >> frustrating touch and hold (and usually try again several times), drag, > >> >> menu choice, etc., vs simple, precise keyboard navigation and short, > >> >> powerful commands for cutting, pasting, etc. Much more efficient this > >> >> way. I had tried a while back to use Excel on my phone. After about > >> >> 10 minutes, I wanted to throw the phone against a wall. By contrast, > >> >> SC, with its vi-like navigation, is a pleasure to use on the phone. > >> >> > >> >> Vim and SC are the obvious choices for effiency when you have a physical > >> >> keyboard, but it's not so obvious that they are also the most efficient > >> >> on a touch screen with a software keyboard. > >> > > >> > This almost makes me want to get ahold of an Android device ;) > >> > In an environment like that, is it possible to get direct access > >> > to something like a 'Google Sheet'? > >> > >> I've never tried that, but this looks promising: > >> > >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vISRn5qFrkM > >> > >> Also, if you can get that sheet downloaded as csv, then you can import > >> it directly into sc. > > > > I've never done it but GS does have .csv export > > Something else to consider: If you watch that guy's video, you'll that > he has a python script that interacts with a google sheet. Since sc is > able to use external commands, you could possibly have sc cell values sent > to a google sheet by hitting a hotkey inside of sc. If you didn't want > to bother with that, at the very least you should be able to interact > with a google sheet from a command line script, and use vim as your > script editor. Were I to do this I probably would mess around with external commands. Excel is even opening itself up to the bane that is JavaScript (a new thing for Feeb to have a fit over): <https://www.wired.com/story/microsoft-excel-javascript/> I just now watched that video, I didn't know Google Drive had an API! This is pretty handy and it solves a problem with some data by a client of mine who is afraid of computers but has managed to work their way up to using Google Docs (a little, enough for this to be useful to me).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-13 04:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sbz899b73.aghui4@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #451252 |
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 11:46:37 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: >> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 11:20:23 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: >> >> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 6:38:19 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: >> >> >> After working with vim and sc under linux on the android, I have noticed >> >> >> that, as counterintuitive as it might seem, editing and spreadsheet >> >> >> tasks are actually much *easier* this way than they are with the usual >> >> >> touch-screen interface to typical android apps of those types. All that >> >> >> frustrating touch and hold (and usually try again several times), drag, >> >> >> menu choice, etc., vs simple, precise keyboard navigation and short, >> >> >> powerful commands for cutting, pasting, etc. Much more efficient this >> >> >> way. I had tried a while back to use Excel on my phone. After about >> >> >> 10 minutes, I wanted to throw the phone against a wall. By contrast, >> >> >> SC, with its vi-like navigation, is a pleasure to use on the phone. >> >> >> >> >> >> Vim and SC are the obvious choices for effiency when you have a physical >> >> >> keyboard, but it's not so obvious that they are also the most efficient >> >> >> on a touch screen with a software keyboard. >> >> > >> >> > This almost makes me want to get ahold of an Android device ;) >> >> > In an environment like that, is it possible to get direct access >> >> > to something like a 'Google Sheet'? >> >> >> >> I've never tried that, but this looks promising: >> >> >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vISRn5qFrkM >> >> >> >> Also, if you can get that sheet downloaded as csv, then you can import >> >> it directly into sc. >> > >> > I've never done it but GS does have .csv export >> >> Something else to consider: If you watch that guy's video, you'll that >> he has a python script that interacts with a google sheet. Since sc is >> able to use external commands, you could possibly have sc cell values sent >> to a google sheet by hitting a hotkey inside of sc. If you didn't want >> to bother with that, at the very least you should be able to interact >> with a google sheet from a command line script, and use vim as your >> script editor. > > Were I to do this I probably would mess around with external commands. > Excel is even opening itself up to the bane that is JavaScript (a new thing > for Feeb to have a fit over): > > <https://www.wired.com/story/microsoft-excel-javascript/> > > I just now watched that video, I didn't know Google Drive had an API! > This is pretty handy and it solves a problem with some data by a client > of mine who is afraid of computers but has managed to work their way > up to using Google Docs (a little, enough for this to be useful to me). Damnit, now I have to go back and look at python again. If DFS were here, he could be a big help in quickly translating some bash to python to get SC working with gspread.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-13 10:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a2fcea91-32d1-492d-8aa4-e6554e0a2224@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451272 |
On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 10:34:33 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: > Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 11:46:37 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: > >> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 11:20:23 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: > >> >> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 6:38:19 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: > >> >> >> After working with vim and sc under linux on the android, I have noticed > >> >> >> that, as counterintuitive as it might seem, editing and spreadsheet > >> >> >> tasks are actually much *easier* this way than they are with the usual > >> >> >> touch-screen interface to typical android apps of those types. All that > >> >> >> frustrating touch and hold (and usually try again several times), drag, > >> >> >> menu choice, etc., vs simple, precise keyboard navigation and short, > >> >> >> powerful commands for cutting, pasting, etc. Much more efficient this > >> >> >> way. I had tried a while back to use Excel on my phone. After about > >> >> >> 10 minutes, I wanted to throw the phone against a wall. By contrast, > >> >> >> SC, with its vi-like navigation, is a pleasure to use on the phone. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Vim and SC are the obvious choices for effiency when you have a physical > >> >> >> keyboard, but it's not so obvious that they are also the most efficient > >> >> >> on a touch screen with a software keyboard. > >> >> > > >> >> > This almost makes me want to get ahold of an Android device ;) > >> >> > In an environment like that, is it possible to get direct access > >> >> > to something like a 'Google Sheet'? > >> >> > >> >> I've never tried that, but this looks promising: > >> >> > >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vISRn5qFrkM > >> >> > >> >> Also, if you can get that sheet downloaded as csv, then you can import > >> >> it directly into sc. > >> > > >> > I've never done it but GS does have .csv export > >> > >> Something else to consider: If you watch that guy's video, you'll that > >> he has a python script that interacts with a google sheet. Since sc is > >> able to use external commands, you could possibly have sc cell values sent > >> to a google sheet by hitting a hotkey inside of sc. If you didn't want > >> to bother with that, at the very least you should be able to interact > >> with a google sheet from a command line script, and use vim as your > >> script editor. > > > > Were I to do this I probably would mess around with external commands. > > Excel is even opening itself up to the bane that is JavaScript (a new thing > > for Feeb to have a fit over): > > > > <https://www.wired.com/story/microsoft-excel-javascript/> > > > > I just now watched that video, I didn't know Google Drive had an API! > > This is pretty handy and it solves a problem with some data by a client > > of mine who is afraid of computers but has managed to work their way > > up to using Google Docs (a little, enough for this to be useful to me). > > Damnit, now I have to go back and look at python again. If DFS > were here, he could be a big help in quickly translating some bash > to python to get SC working with gspread. Where the hell is that guy? There's definitely some value in learning a language like Python and, given your knowledge, I doubt you'd have much trouble with doing this. If you're more accustomed to C syntax I think you can also do it with JavaScript.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 25 of 27 — ← Prev page 1 … 23 24 [25] 26 27 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web