Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #319079 > unrolled thread

Leave Snit and his Mac behind in the 20th Century

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  Leave Snit and his Mac behind in the 20th Century Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-05 14:44 +0000
    Re: Leave Snit and his Mac behind in the 20th Century Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 08:43 -0700
      Re: Leave Snit and his Mac behind in the 20th Century Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-05 17:18 +0000
        Re: Leave Snit and his Mac behind in the 20th Century owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-05 17:45 +0000
          Re: Leave Snit and his Mac behind in the 20th Century Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-05 17:54 +0000
            Re: Leave Snit and his Mac behind in the 20th Century owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-05 18:00 +0000
              Re: Leave Snit and his Mac behind in the 20th Century Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-05 11:07 -0700
                Re: Leave Snit and his Mac behind in the 20th Century Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-05 18:59 +0000
              Re: Leave Snit and his Mac behind in the 20th Century Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-05 18:58 +0000
            Re: Leave Snit and his Mac behind in the 20th Century Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-05 11:06 -0700
          Re: Leave Snit and his Mac behind in the 20th Century "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-05 16:14 -0400
            Re: Leave Snit and his Mac behind in the 20th Century owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-05 20:46 +0000
              Re: Leave Snit and his Mac behind in the 20th Century dunno <dunno@dunno.dunno> - 2015-09-05 22:18 +0000
              Re: Leave Snit and his Mac behind in the 20th Century "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-05 18:55 -0400
                Re: Leave Snit and his Mac behind in the 20th Century Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-06 00:56 +0200
                  Re: Leave Snit and his Mac behind in the 20th Century Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-05 20:42 -0400
                    Re: Leave Snit and his Mac behind in the 20th Century Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-06 09:39 +0200
                      Re: Leave Snit and his Mac behind in the 20th Century Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-06 10:50 -0700
                    Re: Leave Snit and his Mac behind in the 20th Century William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-09-06 13:21 +0100
                Re: Leave Snit and his Mac behind in the 20th Century owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-05 23:20 +0000
                  Re: Leave Snit and his Mac behind in the 20th Century "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-05 19:34 -0400
                    Re: Leave Snit and his Mac behind in the 20th Century Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-09-06 01:37 +0200
                      Re: Leave Snit and his Mac behind in the 20th Century "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-05 19:53 -0400
                      Re: Leave Snit and his Mac behind in the 20th Century dunno <dunno@dunno.dunno> - 2015-09-06 04:00 +0000
              Re: Leave Snit and his Mac behind in the 20th Century Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-06 06:51 +0000
                Re: Leave Snit and his Mac behind in the 20th Century owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-06 07:33 +0000
                  Re: Leave Snit and his Mac behind in the 20th Century Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-06 09:54 +0200
                    Re: Leave Snit and his Mac behind in the 20th Century Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-06 10:52 -0700
                  Re: Leave Snit and his Mac behind in the 20th Century owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-06 08:28 +0000
                    Re: Leave Snit and his Mac behind in the 20th Century Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-06 11:05 +0200
              Snit outs his "A.M" sock Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-06 06:58 +0000
            Re: Leave Snit and his Mac behind in the 20th Century "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-05 18:49 -0400

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#319216

On 2015-09-05 7:20 PM, owl wrote:
> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>> On 2015-09-05 4:46 PM, owl wrote:
>>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>>>> On 2015-09-05 1:45 PM, owl wrote:
>>>>> Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 05 Sep 2015 08:43:07 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Saturday, September 5, 2015 at 8:44:38 AM UTC-6, Nobody wrote:
>>>>>>>> If you want to save recipes from www.food.com use their Recipe Box
>>>>>>>> feature.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No need to save as PDF in a recipe folder on your HD.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No need to dig the recipe back out of a folder and attach it to an
>>>>>>>> email to share it with a friend.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Food.com will let you share it out of your Recipe Box via Email or any
>>>>>>>> of the popular social media sites such as Face Book or Twitter.  Add
>>>>>>>> any comments you like.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Or just share directly from the site without going into your Recipe
>>>>>>>> Box.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Good points. That aside, I'd still rather see Snit get tied up the way
>>>>>>> owl has him tied up with that stuff as opposed to the other BS Snit
>>>>>>> does.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Now if we could get the two of them to take it to email...
>>>>>
>>>>> 115      Nobody <nobody@invalid.com>
>>>>> 80       Peter K??hlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de>
>>>>> 76       John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com>
>>>>> 74       Tommy Troll <elkabong99@Itroll.org>
>>>>> 71       DFS <nospam@dfs.com>
>>>>> 58       ronb <ronbNOSPAM@gmail.com>
>>>>> 39       owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
>>>>>
>>>>> PKB
>>>
>>>> Wow! Am I the only one who was bored of your thread before it turned
>>>> into a circus? It just seems like every few days, a new topic comes up
>>>> and Snit finds SOMEONE
>>>
>>> Such as Nobody, hence the PKB...
>>>
>>>> to engage him ad nauseum for something like 300
>>>> posts. It then turns into a Snit vs. Whoever thread where Snit
>>>> eventually repeats the same post around 60 times and his opponent tries
>>>> to convince the guy knowing full well that convincing Snit is about as
>>>> likely as getting a knowledgeable statement from Peter the Klöwn.
>>>
>>> And dude, you've got a lot of gall to be making judgements on *anyone*'s
>>> posts/threads.  Go back and read some of the crap you posted, mostly
>>> slightly edited repeats of the same childish insults.  Over and over
>>> and over.  What's that word you used?  Oh yeah, "ad nauseum."
> 
>> If you're requesting that I stop making childish (but realistic) insults
>> about Linux, I can stop. However, I'll wait until Chris Ahlstrom,
>> William Poaster and Peter the Klöwn do it first.
> 
>> As long as they keep lying and acting like children on their end, I will
>> respond with the same kind of behaviour.
> 
> Because it's your duty, right?

Nah, but the same way that you can't control me being here, you can't
control me leaving. I honestly have no interest in remaining and will
probably end up leaving either way. However, I encourage the Linux
losers to stop lying all the time; Linux has a lot going for it and
doesn't need the lies in its defense. It might not be ready for the
desktop and will probably never be, but it's the only one which makes an
effort to respect your privacy. True advocates should remind the
"trolls" of that fact and simply give up if they insist on trolling
anyway. Teach them, make a small attempt to convince them that your
choice is the right one and give up otherwise. Else, it's an endless
back and forth of people calling each other names, lying, propagandizing
and frustration.

Either way, I don't really care if you like me and I won't defend
myself; I have every right to be here as you do.

-- 
A.M

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#319217

On Sat, 5 Sep 2015 19:34:47 -0400
"A.M" <.m@nsn.s> wrote:

> On 2015-09-05 7:20 PM, owl wrote:
> > A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
> >> On 2015-09-05 4:46 PM, owl wrote:
> >>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
> >>>> On 2015-09-05 1:45 PM, owl wrote:
> >>>>> Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> On Sat, 05 Sep 2015 08:43:07 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Saturday, September 5, 2015 at 8:44:38 AM UTC-6, Nobody
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> If you want to save recipes from www.food.com use their
> >>>>>>>> Recipe Box feature.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> No need to save as PDF in a recipe folder on your HD.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> No need to dig the recipe back out of a folder and attach it
> >>>>>>>> to an email to share it with a friend.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Food.com will let you share it out of your Recipe Box via
> >>>>>>>> Email or any of the popular social media sites such as Face
> >>>>>>>> Book or Twitter.  Add any comments you like.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Or just share directly from the site without going into your
> >>>>>>>> Recipe Box.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Good points. That aside, I'd still rather see Snit get tied
> >>>>>>> up the way owl has him tied up with that stuff as opposed to
> >>>>>>> the other BS Snit does.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Now if we could get the two of them to take it to email...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 115      Nobody <nobody@invalid.com>
> >>>>> 80       Peter K??hlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de>
> >>>>> 76       John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com>
> >>>>> 74       Tommy Troll <elkabong99@Itroll.org>
> >>>>> 71       DFS <nospam@dfs.com>
> >>>>> 58       ronb <ronbNOSPAM@gmail.com>
> >>>>> 39       owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> PKB
> >>>
> >>>> Wow! Am I the only one who was bored of your thread before it
> >>>> turned into a circus? It just seems like every few days, a new
> >>>> topic comes up and Snit finds SOMEONE
> >>>
> >>> Such as Nobody, hence the PKB...
> >>>
> >>>> to engage him ad nauseum for something like 300
> >>>> posts. It then turns into a Snit vs. Whoever thread where Snit
> >>>> eventually repeats the same post around 60 times and his
> >>>> opponent tries to convince the guy knowing full well that
> >>>> convincing Snit is about as likely as getting a knowledgeable
> >>>> statement from Peter the Klöwn.
> >>>
> >>> And dude, you've got a lot of gall to be making judgements on
> >>> *anyone*'s posts/threads.  Go back and read some of the crap you
> >>> posted, mostly slightly edited repeats of the same childish
> >>> insults.  Over and over and over.  What's that word you used?  Oh
> >>> yeah, "ad nauseum."
> > 
> >> If you're requesting that I stop making childish (but realistic)
> >> insults about Linux, I can stop. However, I'll wait until Chris
> >> Ahlstrom, William Poaster and Peter the Klöwn do it first.
> > 
> >> As long as they keep lying and acting like children on their end,
> >> I will respond with the same kind of behaviour.
> > 
> > Because it's your duty, right?
> 
> Nah, but the same way that you can't control me being here, you can't
> control me leaving.

Usenet is last oasis of freedom on internet... I hate censorship and
propaganda...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#319218

On 2015-09-05 7:37 PM, Melzzzzz wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Sep 2015 19:34:47 -0400
> "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
> 
>> On 2015-09-05 7:20 PM, owl wrote:
>>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>>>> On 2015-09-05 4:46 PM, owl wrote:
>>>>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2015-09-05 1:45 PM, owl wrote:
>>>>>>> Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 05 Sep 2015 08:43:07 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, September 5, 2015 at 8:44:38 AM UTC-6, Nobody
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> If you want to save recipes from www.food.com use their
>>>>>>>>>> Recipe Box feature.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No need to save as PDF in a recipe folder on your HD.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No need to dig the recipe back out of a folder and attach it
>>>>>>>>>> to an email to share it with a friend.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Food.com will let you share it out of your Recipe Box via
>>>>>>>>>> Email or any of the popular social media sites such as Face
>>>>>>>>>> Book or Twitter.  Add any comments you like.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Or just share directly from the site without going into your
>>>>>>>>>> Recipe Box.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Good points. That aside, I'd still rather see Snit get tied
>>>>>>>>> up the way owl has him tied up with that stuff as opposed to
>>>>>>>>> the other BS Snit does.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now if we could get the two of them to take it to email...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 115      Nobody <nobody@invalid.com>
>>>>>>> 80       Peter K??hlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de>
>>>>>>> 76       John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> 74       Tommy Troll <elkabong99@Itroll.org>
>>>>>>> 71       DFS <nospam@dfs.com>
>>>>>>> 58       ronb <ronbNOSPAM@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> 39       owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> PKB
>>>>>
>>>>>> Wow! Am I the only one who was bored of your thread before it
>>>>>> turned into a circus? It just seems like every few days, a new
>>>>>> topic comes up and Snit finds SOMEONE
>>>>>
>>>>> Such as Nobody, hence the PKB...
>>>>>
>>>>>> to engage him ad nauseum for something like 300
>>>>>> posts. It then turns into a Snit vs. Whoever thread where Snit
>>>>>> eventually repeats the same post around 60 times and his
>>>>>> opponent tries to convince the guy knowing full well that
>>>>>> convincing Snit is about as likely as getting a knowledgeable
>>>>>> statement from Peter the Klöwn.
>>>>>
>>>>> And dude, you've got a lot of gall to be making judgements on
>>>>> *anyone*'s posts/threads.  Go back and read some of the crap you
>>>>> posted, mostly slightly edited repeats of the same childish
>>>>> insults.  Over and over and over.  What's that word you used?  Oh
>>>>> yeah, "ad nauseum."
>>>
>>>> If you're requesting that I stop making childish (but realistic)
>>>> insults about Linux, I can stop. However, I'll wait until Chris
>>>> Ahlstrom, William Poaster and Peter the Klöwn do it first.
>>>
>>>> As long as they keep lying and acting like children on their end,
>>>> I will respond with the same kind of behaviour.
>>>
>>> Because it's your duty, right?
>>
>> Nah, but the same way that you can't control me being here, you can't
>> control me leaving.
> 
> Usenet is last oasis of freedom on internet... I hate censorship and
> propaganda...

You and me both, bro. Like I said in alt.comp.os.windows-10, keyloggers
is where I draw the line.

-- 
A.M

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#319239

Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Sep 2015 19:34:47 -0400
> "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
> 
>> On 2015-09-05 7:20 PM, owl wrote:
>>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>>>> On 2015-09-05 4:46 PM, owl wrote:
>>>>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2015-09-05 1:45 PM, owl wrote:
>>>>>>> Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 05 Sep 2015 08:43:07 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, September 5, 2015 at 8:44:38 AM UTC-6, Nobody
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> If you want to save recipes from www.food.com use their
>>>>>>>>>> Recipe Box feature.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> No need to save as PDF in a recipe folder on your HD.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> No need to dig the recipe back out of a folder and attach it
>>>>>>>>>> to an email to share it with a friend.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Food.com will let you share it out of your Recipe Box via
>>>>>>>>>> Email or any of the popular social media sites such as Face
>>>>>>>>>> Book or Twitter.  Add any comments you like.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Or just share directly from the site without going into your
>>>>>>>>>> Recipe Box.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Good points. That aside, I'd still rather see Snit get tied
>>>>>>>>> up the way owl has him tied up with that stuff as opposed to
>>>>>>>>> the other BS Snit does.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Now if we could get the two of them to take it to email...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 115      Nobody <nobody@invalid.com>
>>>>>>> 80       Peter K??hlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de>
>>>>>>> 76       John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> 74       Tommy Troll <elkabong99@Itroll.org>
>>>>>>> 71       DFS <nospam@dfs.com>
>>>>>>> 58       ronb <ronbNOSPAM@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> 39       owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> PKB
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Wow! Am I the only one who was bored of your thread before it
>>>>>> turned into a circus? It just seems like every few days, a new
>>>>>> topic comes up and Snit finds SOMEONE
>>>>> 
>>>>> Such as Nobody, hence the PKB...
>>>>> 
>>>>>> to engage him ad nauseum for something like 300
>>>>>> posts. It then turns into a Snit vs. Whoever thread where Snit
>>>>>> eventually repeats the same post around 60 times and his
>>>>>> opponent tries to convince the guy knowing full well that
>>>>>> convincing Snit is about as likely as getting a knowledgeable
>>>>>> statement from Peter the Klöwn.
>>>>> 
>>>>> And dude, you've got a lot of gall to be making judgements on
>>>>> *anyone*'s posts/threads.  Go back and read some of the crap you
>>>>> posted, mostly slightly edited repeats of the same childish
>>>>> insults.  Over and over and over.  What's that word you used?  Oh
>>>>> yeah, "ad nauseum."
>>> 
>>>> If you're requesting that I stop making childish (but realistic)
>>>> insults about Linux, I can stop. However, I'll wait until Chris
>>>> Ahlstrom, William Poaster and Peter the Klöwn do it first.
>>> 
>>>> As long as they keep lying and acting like children on their end,
>>>> I will respond with the same kind of behaviour.
>>> 
>>> Because it's your duty, right?
>> 
>> Nah, but the same way that you can't control me being here, you can't
>> control me leaving.
> 
> Usenet is last oasis of freedom on internet... I hate censorship and
> propaganda...

No, it's not. There are other places, too.

-- 
dunno

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#319250

On Sat, 05 Sep 2015 20:46:39 +0000, owl wrote:

> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>> On 2015-09-05 1:45 PM, owl wrote:
>>> Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 05 Sep 2015 08:43:07 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> On Saturday, September 5, 2015 at 8:44:38 AM UTC-6, Nobody wrote:
>>>>>> If you want to save recipes from www.food.com use their Recipe Box
>>>>>> feature.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No need to save as PDF in a recipe folder on your HD.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No need to dig the recipe back out of a folder and attach it to an
>>>>>> email to share it with a friend.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Food.com will let you share it out of your Recipe Box via Email or
>>>>>> any of the popular social media sites such as Face Book or Twitter.
>>>>>>  Add any comments you like.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or just share directly from the site without going into your Recipe
>>>>>> Box.
>>>>>
>>>>> Good points. That aside, I'd still rather see Snit get tied up the
>>>>> way owl has him tied up with that stuff as opposed to the other BS
>>>>> Snit does.
>>> 
>>>> Now if we could get the two of them to take it to email...
>>> 
>>> 115      Nobody <nobody@invalid.com>
>>> 80       Peter K??hlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de>
>>> 76       John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com>
>>> 74       Tommy Troll <elkabong99@Itroll.org>
>>> 71       DFS <nospam@dfs.com>
>>> 58       ronb <ronbNOSPAM@gmail.com>
>>> 39       owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
>>> 
>>> PKB
> 
>> Wow! Am I the only one who was bored of your thread before it turned
>> into a circus? It just seems like every few days, a new topic comes up
>> and Snit finds SOMEONE
> 
> Such as Nobody, hence the PKB...

The majority of what I post is not replies to Snit or his socks.

>> to engage him ad nauseum for something like 300 posts. It then turns
>> into a Snit vs. Whoever thread where Snit eventually repeats the same
>> post around 60 times and his opponent tries to convince the guy knowing
>> full well that convincing Snit is about as likely as getting a
>> knowledgeable statement from Peter the Klöwn.
> 
> And dude, you've got a lot of gall to be making judgements on *anyone*'s
> posts/threads.  Go back and read some of the crap you posted, mostly
> slightly edited repeats of the same childish insults.  Over and over and
> over.  What's that word you used?  Oh yeah, "ad nauseum."

How could you not know you're replying to Snit's sock?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#319258

Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Sep 2015 20:46:39 +0000, owl wrote:

>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>>> On 2015-09-05 1:45 PM, owl wrote:
>>>> Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 05 Sep 2015 08:43:07 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>> On Saturday, September 5, 2015 at 8:44:38 AM UTC-6, Nobody wrote:
>>>>>>> If you want to save recipes from www.food.com use their Recipe Box
>>>>>>> feature.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No need to save as PDF in a recipe folder on your HD.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No need to dig the recipe back out of a folder and attach it to an
>>>>>>> email to share it with a friend.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Food.com will let you share it out of your Recipe Box via Email or
>>>>>>> any of the popular social media sites such as Face Book or Twitter.
>>>>>>>  Add any comments you like.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Or just share directly from the site without going into your Recipe
>>>>>>> Box.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good points. That aside, I'd still rather see Snit get tied up the
>>>>>> way owl has him tied up with that stuff as opposed to the other BS
>>>>>> Snit does.
>>>> 
>>>>> Now if we could get the two of them to take it to email...
>>>> 
>>>> 115      Nobody <nobody@invalid.com>
>>>> 80       Peter K??hlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de>
>>>> 76       John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com>
>>>> 74       Tommy Troll <elkabong99@Itroll.org>
>>>> 71       DFS <nospam@dfs.com>
>>>> 58       ronb <ronbNOSPAM@gmail.com>
>>>> 39       owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
>>>> 
>>>> PKB
>> 
>>> Wow! Am I the only one who was bored of your thread before it turned
>>> into a circus? It just seems like every few days, a new topic comes up
>>> and Snit finds SOMEONE
>> 
>> Such as Nobody, hence the PKB...

> The majority of what I post is not replies to Snit or his socks.

Well that's a statement.  Not sure if it's a fact.  Don't really care.
I'm not the net nanny here.  But for the record, I'm about to plonk
Snit if he continues to refuse to show a looping netstat window
while he runs his whatever it is PDF thing.  It looks like I was
right to question his video the first time.

>>> to engage him ad nauseum for something like 300 posts. It then turns
>>> into a Snit vs. Whoever thread where Snit eventually repeats the same
>>> post around 60 times and his opponent tries to convince the guy knowing
>>> full well that convincing Snit is about as likely as getting a
>>> knowledgeable statement from Peter the Klöwn.
>> 
>> And dude, you've got a lot of gall to be making judgements on *anyone*'s
>> posts/threads.  Go back and read some of the crap you posted, mostly
>> slightly edited repeats of the same childish insults.  Over and over and
>> over.  What's that word you used?  Oh yeah, "ad nauseum."

> How could you not know you're replying to Snit's sock?

I agree.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#319267

The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser snotted:

> On 9/6/15, 12:33 AM, in article sadsf.kvz03@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
> 
>>>>> Wow! Am I the only one who was bored of your thread before it turned
>>>>> into a circus? It just seems like every few days, a new topic comes up
>>>>> and Snit finds SOMEONE
>>>> 
>>>> Such as Nobody, hence the PKB...
>> 
>>> The majority of what I post is not replies to Snit or his socks.
>> 
>> Well that's a statement.  Not sure if it's a fact.  Don't really care.
>> I'm not the net nanny here.  But for the record, I'm about to plonk
>> Snit if he continues to refuse to show a looping netstat window
>> while he runs his whatever it is PDF thing.  It looks like I was
>> right to question his video the first time.
> 
> Are you stating it is a fake? A direct accusation?

I am certain it is a fake.
That you steadfastly refuse to do such a simple thing Owl requested proves 
it to be faked.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#319369

On 9/6/15, 12:54 AM, in article msgrcg$17j$5@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann"
<peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:

> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser snotted:
> 
>> On 9/6/15, 12:33 AM, in article sadsf.kvz03@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>>>>> Wow! Am I the only one who was bored of your thread before it turned
>>>>>> into a circus? It just seems like every few days, a new topic comes up
>>>>>> and Snit finds SOMEONE
>>>>> 
>>>>> Such as Nobody, hence the PKB...
>>> 
>>>> The majority of what I post is not replies to Snit or his socks.
>>> 
>>> Well that's a statement.  Not sure if it's a fact.  Don't really care.
>>> I'm not the net nanny here.  But for the record, I'm about to plonk
>>> Snit if he continues to refuse to show a looping netstat window
>>> while he runs his whatever it is PDF thing.  It looks like I was
>>> right to question his video the first time.
>> 
>> Are you stating it is a fake? A direct accusation?
> 
> I am certain it is a fake.

You think you "know" things which are not true. Yup.

> That you steadfastly refuse to do such a simple thing Owl requested proves
> it to be faked.

LOL! I had no obligation to do it... but did it anyway *and* educated him
about where the "?internalSource..." stuff came from (he thought it was hard
coded by me).

-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#319271

Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 9/6/15, 12:33 AM, in article sadsf.kvz03@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:

>>>>> Wow! Am I the only one who was bored of your thread before it turned
>>>>> into a circus? It just seems like every few days, a new topic comes up
>>>>> and Snit finds SOMEONE
>>>> 
>>>> Such as Nobody, hence the PKB...
>> 
>>> The majority of what I post is not replies to Snit or his socks.
>> 
>> Well that's a statement.  Not sure if it's a fact.  Don't really care.
>> I'm not the net nanny here.  But for the record, I'm about to plonk
>> Snit if he continues to refuse to show a looping netstat window
>> while he runs his whatever it is PDF thing.  It looks like I was
>> right to question his video the first time.

> Are you stating it is a fake? A direct accusation?

I'm saying you refuse to show a netstat loop which would go a long
way toward proving it is not a local archive you are working with.
But hey, remember the other day when I told you that your reputation
is not my fault?  Ten points if you can guess what opportunity you
are missing right now.

> You already admitted you cannot figure out how I get the URLs. Kinda funny.

You don't need that mousever "?internalSource" string to spot the URLs.
Everything you need is on the main page.  Yet in your mind having
paparazzi go after that string on a known linked page is not "cheating"
but knowing that there are three URLs for the main page is "hard-coding"
and "cheating."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#319274

The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser snotted:

> On 9/6/15, 1:28 AM, in article admv73l9a.jie@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 9/6/15, 12:33 AM, in article sadsf.kvz03@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>>>>>> Wow! Am I the only one who was bored of your thread before it turned
>>>>>>> into a circus? It just seems like every few days, a new topic comes
>>>>>>> up and Snit finds SOMEONE
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Such as Nobody, hence the PKB...
>>>> 
>>>>> The majority of what I post is not replies to Snit or his socks.
>>>> 
>>>> Well that's a statement.  Not sure if it's a fact.  Don't really care.
>>>> I'm not the net nanny here.  But for the record, I'm about to plonk
>>>> Snit if he continues to refuse to show a looping netstat window
>>>> while he runs his whatever it is PDF thing.  It looks like I was
>>>> right to question his video the first time.
>> 
>>> Are you stating it is a fake? A direct accusation?
>> 
>> I'm saying you refuse to show a netstat loop which would go a long
>> way toward proving it is not a local archive you are working with.
> 
> Good grief.
> 
> First you blamed me of copying the files locally. I proved you wrong

You proved nothing.

What you are proving right now is that you are lying (again)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#319251 — Snit outs his "A.M" sock

On Sat, 05 Sep 2015 14:05:07 -0700, Snit wrote:

> On 9/5/15, 1:46 PM, in article famnvcxz803.af@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
> 
>>> Wow! Am I the only one who was bored of your thread before it turned
>>> into a circus? It just seems like every few days, a new topic comes up
>>> and Snit finds SOMEONE
>> 
>> Such as Nobody, hence the PKB...
>> 
>>> to engage him ad nauseum for something like 300 posts. It then turns
>>> into a Snit vs. Whoever thread where Snit eventually repeats the same
>>> post around 60 times and his opponent tries to convince the guy
>>> knowing full well that convincing Snit is about as likely as getting a
>>> knowledgeable statement from Peter the Klöwn.
>> 
>> And dude, you've got a lot of gall to be making judgements on
>> *anyone*'s posts/threads.  Go back and read some of the crap you
>> posted, mostly slightly edited repeats of the same childish insults. 
>> Over and over and over.  What's that word you used?  Oh yeah, "ad
>> nauseum."
> 
> Still, he is right that I have a much stronger tendency to respond to
> those who troll me.

He wrote that to "A.M," and you're replying as if he wrote it to you.

Yet another of "Drew P. Bawls" socks has been busted!

How's it hanging, Droopy?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#319201

On 2015-09-05 4:54 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 9/5/15, 1:14 PM, in article msfib4$frv$2@dont-email.me, "A.M" <.m@nsn.s>
> wrote:
> 
>>>> Now if we could get the two of them to take it to email...
>>>
>>> 115      Nobody <nobody@invalid.com>
>>> 80       Peter K??hlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de>
>>> 76       John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com>
>>> 74       Tommy Troll <elkabong99@Itroll.org>
>>> 71       DFS <nospam@dfs.com>
>>> 58       ronb <ronbNOSPAM@gmail.com>
>>> 39       owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
>>>
>>> PKB
>>
>> Wow! Am I the only one who was bored of your thread before it turned
>> into a circus? It just seems like every few days, a new topic comes up
>> and Snit finds SOMEONE to engage him ad nauseum for something like 300
>> posts. It then turns into a Snit vs. Whoever thread where Snit
>> eventually repeats the same post around 60 times and his opponent tries
>> to convince the guy knowing full well that convincing Snit is about as
>> likely as getting a knowledgeable statement from Peter the Klöwn.
> 
> Hey, the conversation I am having with Owl is pretty good - we are both
> actually focusing on a task and how well we can do it and comparing OSs /
> environments.

I'm sure it is, not interested though.


-- 
A.M

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web