Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #483774 > unrolled thread
| Started by | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-01-10 21:00 +0000 |
| Last post | 2019-01-12 10:10 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 192 — 22 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-10 21:00 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-10 13:18 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-10 14:48 -0700
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-10 14:05 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-10 14:49 -0700
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-11 02:33 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-10 19:49 -0500
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-10 17:50 -0700
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-10 17:14 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-11 02:02 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-11 08:48 -0600
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-11 15:52 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-11 09:04 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-11 12:16 -0500
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-01-12 13:34 -0500
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 12:13 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-13 02:32 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-01-13 12:42 -0500
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-13 18:50 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-13 12:41 -0700
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-01-17 05:23 -0500
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 04:21 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 04:54 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-01-19 08:19 -0500
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 06:12 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 19:26 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 21:35 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-11 17:15 -0700
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-11 16:24 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-11 17:26 -0700
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-11 16:53 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-12 17:37 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-12 12:49 -0700
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 12:46 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-01-12 13:33 -0500
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 11:09 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-13 02:31 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-01-13 12:41 -0500
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-13 13:59 -0500
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-13 12:24 -0700
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-13 22:00 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-13 22:32 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-01-17 05:19 -0500
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-17 09:24 -0500
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 04:38 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-01-19 08:17 -0500
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 05:57 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-19 11:11 -0500
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-19 17:22 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-19 18:10 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 10:37 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-01-19 13:22 -0500
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-19 14:26 -0500
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 19:35 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-19 19:58 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 12:11 -0800
I got "rich" by lowering my expenses. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-19 12:47 -0800
Re: I got "rich" by lowering my expenses. Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-19 21:17 +0000
Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-19 13:23 -0800
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). Jeff-Relf.Me@ - 2019-01-19 14:32 -0700
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-19 21:36 +0000
I can edge for hours. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-19 13:45 -0800
Re: I can edge for hours. Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-19 21:53 +0000
PeeScent ( not Amanda nor me ). Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-19 14:04 -0800
Re: PeeScent ( not Amanda nor me ). Jeff-Relf.Me@. - 2019-01-19 15:15 -0700
Re: PeeScent ( not Amanda nor me ). Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-19 22:28 +0000
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 13:45 -0800
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 21:51 +0000
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 14:53 -0700
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 22:01 +0000
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 15:07 -0700
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 22:26 +0000
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 15:30 -0700
PeeScent is unimaginably illiterate; he can't use a browser. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-19 15:00 -0800
Re: PeeScent is unimaginably illiterate; he can't use a browser. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2019-01-20 00:05 +0100
PeeScent is unimaginably illiterate; he can't use a browser. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-19 15:10 -0800
Re: PeeScent is unimaginably illiterate; he can't use a browser. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 16:14 -0700
Re: PeeScent is unimaginably illiterate; he can't use a browser. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 16:19 -0700
Re: PeeScent is unimaginably illiterate; he can't use a browser. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 16:13 -0700
Re: PeeScent is unimaginably illiterate; he can't use a browser. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 16:08 -0700
Re: PeeScent is unimaginably illiterate; he can't use a browser. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 18:09 -0500
Re: PeeScent is unimaginably illiterate; he can't use a browser. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 16:15 -0700
Re: PeeScent is unimaginably illiterate; he can't use a browser. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 15:19 -0800
Re: PeeScent is unimaginably illiterate; he can't use a browser. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 16:13 -0700
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 14:32 -0800
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-19 22:29 +0000
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-21 01:27 -0800
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 01:52 -0800
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-21 20:15 +0000
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 12:30 -0800
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-21 14:07 -0800
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 14:51 -0800
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 17:20 -0700
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 20:10 -0500
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-21 18:44 -0800
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 20:03 -0700
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-21 20:59 -0800
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-22 04:36 -0700
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 03:52 -0800
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-22 02:16 +0000
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-21 18:29 -0800
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 19:34 -0700
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 20:18 -0800
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 22:39 -0800
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-01-22 19:20 -0500
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 17:08 -0800
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 19:29 -0800
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-23 01:58 -0800
Re: Happiness is an empty bladder ( not a warm gun ). Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-19 21:55 +0000
Bungee Dance Fitness. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-19 14:51 -0800
Re: Bungee Dance Fitness. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 15:03 -0800
Re: I got "rich" by lowering my expenses. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 00:06 +0000
Legal Drugs and Privilege. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-20 03:21 -0800
Re: Legal Drugs and Privilege. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 04:05 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 23:58 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-20 00:13 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 20:00 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 04:46 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 21:19 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-20 12:18 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 05:38 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-20 08:40 -0500
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-20 15:56 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 08:15 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-20 17:21 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 09:32 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-20 12:39 -0500
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-20 18:42 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 11:06 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-20 17:21 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 23:03 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-22 12:32 -0500
" Heroin + Fentanyl + ??? " injections, XanaX pills, and alcoholic drinks. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-20 04:13 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-20 12:18 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-20 12:18 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-19 22:31 -0500
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 04:47 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-20 12:18 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-20 12:18 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 04:36 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-20 12:18 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-19 20:37 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-19 22:39 -0500
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-19 12:43 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-19 21:09 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-01-22 09:42 -0500
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-01-19 13:21 -0500
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-19 14:27 -0500
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-01-20 09:26 -0500
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 06:56 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 07:11 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-20 12:17 -0500
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 09:48 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-20 09:53 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-20 18:42 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-20 19:48 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 12:08 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-22 10:52 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 11:09 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 15:18 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 23:05 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-22 12:34 -0500
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 10:06 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 19:09 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-01-20 09:26 -0500
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-20 15:38 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 07:59 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 23:07 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-01-21 07:12 -0500
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 05:14 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 13:24 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-21 07:47 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-21 17:28 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 19:25 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 11:43 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-21 22:22 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-21 19:57 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-22 14:10 -0500
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-21 16:54 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-01-22 19:23 -0500
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-23 20:30 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-20 12:18 -0500
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-01-21 07:14 -0500
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-22 12:40 -0500
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 23:06 +0000
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 15:29 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-13 10:47 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-13 19:40 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 00:06 -0800
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-11 11:56 -0500
Re: OT: Black, 7 year-old Houston Girl Murdered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-11 09:37 -0800
Go eat some yellow snow, RonB! Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 10:10 -0800
Page 2 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 10 Next page →
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-17 05:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q1pmed$639$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #484232 |
RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> I don't think Trump is any more corrupt than any politician. He's just more
> blunt about it than the average slimy, sneak-behind-your-back, reptilian
> politician. Trump is definitely less slimy than Hillary Clinton, who was
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
LMAO. You've been watching too many "Apprentice" episodes.
> able to walk away after purposely disobeying the law and exposing classified
> information on her personal email server. But slimy Comey thought that was
> "A-OK."
No he didn't. He probably cost Hillary the election.
And yet General Petraeus, who gave away classified information deliberately,
is, AFAIK, a television pundit.
Go figure.
--
Be free and open and breezy! Enjoy! Things won't get any better so
get used to it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-18 04:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q1rk8q$s81$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #484751 |
On 2019-01-17, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> I don't think Trump is any more corrupt than any politician. He's just more >> blunt about it than the average slimy, sneak-behind-your-back, reptilian >> politician. Trump is definitely less slimy than Hillary Clinton, who was > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > LMAO. You've been watching too many "Apprentice" episodes. Sorry, never watched a single episode. I do know, however, that Hillary Clinton oozes slime. I've known it for years, long before she felt entitled to run for president with basically zero qualifications. >> able to walk away after purposely disobeying the law and exposing classified >> information on her personal email server. But slimy Comey thought that was >> "A-OK." > > No he didn't. He probably cost Hillary the election. Hillary Clinton should be in prison for this. > And yet General Petraeus, who gave away classified information deliberately, > is, AFAIK, a television pundit. > > Go figure. Back to the beginning ... all politicians (and military generals are politicians) are slime. You judge a politician by its level of sliminess. None are more slimy than Hillary Clinton, except maybe her slimy husband. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-18 04:54 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <36542a8b-ab91-4de1-97f8-deb877c77af6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #484823 |
On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 9:21:48 PM UTC-7, RonB wrote: > On 2019-01-17, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > > RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > > > >> I don't think Trump is any more corrupt than any politician. He's just more > >> blunt about it than the average slimy, sneak-behind-your-back, reptilian > >> politician. Trump is definitely less slimy than Hillary Clinton, who was > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > LMAO. You've been watching too many "Apprentice" episodes. > > Sorry, never watched a single episode. I do know, however, that Hillary > Clinton oozes slime. I've known it for years, long before she felt entitled > to run for president with basically zero qualifications. > > >> able to walk away after purposely disobeying the law and exposing classified > >> information on her personal email server. But slimy Comey thought that was > >> "A-OK." > > > > No he didn't. He probably cost Hillary the election. > > Hillary Clinton should be in prison for this. > > > And yet General Petraeus, who gave away classified information deliberately, > > is, AFAIK, a television pundit. > > > > Go figure. > > Back to the beginning ... all politicians (and military generals are > politicians) are slime. You judge a politician by its level of sliminess. > None are more slimy than Hillary Clinton, except maybe her slimy husband. > > -- > The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux. Total rot by a delusional, fibbing, agenda driven, collaborating twit who would not tell the truth even if you paid him to. Nobody is being controlled by the MSM. Frankly I do not really give a shit. Oh goodness, that is just tons of kvetching. DFS suffers from paranoid drug trips so, to him, everything, even people ignoring him, are "libel". Who *doesn't* know this? Does Klaus Schadenfreude believe the nonsense DFS is spewing? Klaus Schadenfreude obviously has plenty of know-how to teach and he seems to want to provide screencasts to help others. Sadly this is arguably the least appropriate group for doing that because much of the responses are insulting, misleading, and other bunkum. Open source is only cost effective if your time has no value. -- Best CMS Solution of 2017 http://www.5z8.info/mercenary_w5v9dl_open.exe http://www.5z8.info/nic_cage_naked_y8b5qk_torrentEverything https://redd.it/6sfkup Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 08:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q1v9fl$idr$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #484823 |
RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On 2019-01-17, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >> RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> I don't think Trump is any more corrupt than any politician. He's just more >>> blunt about it than the average slimy, sneak-behind-your-back, reptilian >>> politician. Trump is definitely less slimy than Hillary Clinton, who was >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> >> LMAO. You've been watching too many "Apprentice" episodes. > > Sorry, never watched a single episode. I do know, however, that Hillary > Clinton oozes slime. I've known it for years, long before she felt entitled > to run for president with basically zero qualifications. If you don't count having been a lawyer, a First Lady, a Senator, and a Secretary of State. >>> able to walk away after purposely disobeying the law and exposing classified >>> information on her personal email server. But slimy Comey thought that was >>> "A-OK." >> >> No he didn't. He probably cost Hillary the election. > > Hillary Clinton should be in prison for this. What, for hiring an idiot to administer her IT systems? >> And yet General Petraeus, who gave away classified information deliberately, >> is, AFAIK, a television pundit. >> >> Go figure. > > Back to the beginning ... all politicians (and military generals are > politicians) are slime. You judge a politician by its level of sliminess. > None are more slimy than Hillary Clinton, except maybe her slimy husband. Heh. Hillary was, for awhile, "The most admired woman in America". -- Q: How many members of the U.S.S. Enterprise does it take to change a light bulb? A: Seven. Scotty has to report to Captain Kirk that the light bulb in the Engineering Section is getting dim, at which point Kirk will send Bones to pronounce the bulb dead (although he'll immediately claim that he's a doctor, not an electrician). Scotty, after checking around, realizes that they have no more new light bulbs, and complains that he "canna" see in the dark. Kirk will make an emergency stop at the next uncharted planet, Alpha Regula IV, to procure a light bulb from the natives, who, are friendly, but seem to be hiding something. Kirk, Spock, Bones, Yeoman Rand and two red shirt security officers beam down to the planet, where the two security officers are promply killed by the natives, and the rest of the landing party is captured. As something begins to develop between the Captain and Yeoman Rand, Scotty, back in orbit, is attacked by a Klingon destroyer and must warp out of orbit. Although badly outgunned, he cripples the Klingon and races back to the planet in order to rescue Kirk et. al. who have just saved the natives' from an awful fate and, as a reward, been given all light bulbs they can carry. The new bulb is then inserted and the Enterprise continues on its five year mission.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 06:12 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5f7adf2c-2fcf-4abe-a3b9-944b2a222e54@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #485007 |
On Saturday, January 19, 2019 at 6:42:16 AM UTC-7, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
> > On 2019-01-17, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
> >> RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> >>
> >>> I don't think Trump is any more corrupt than any politician. He's just more
> >>> blunt about it than the average slimy, sneak-behind-your-back, reptilian
> >>> politician. Trump is definitely less slimy than Hillary Clinton, who was
> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >>
> >> LMAO. You've been watching too many "Apprentice" episodes.
> >
> > Sorry, never watched a single episode. I do know, however, that Hillary
> > Clinton oozes slime. I've known it for years, long before she felt entitled
> > to run for president with basically zero qualifications.
>
> If you don't count having been a lawyer, a First Lady, a Senator, and
> a Secretary of State.
>
> >>> able to walk away after purposely disobeying the law and exposing classified
> >>> information on her personal email server. But slimy Comey thought that was
> >>> "A-OK."
> >>
> >> No he didn't. He probably cost Hillary the election.
> >
> > Hillary Clinton should be in prison for this.
>
> What, for hiring an idiot to administer her IT systems?
>
> >> And yet General Petraeus, who gave away classified information deliberately,
> >> is, AFAIK, a television pundit.
> >>
> >> Go figure.
> >
> > Back to the beginning ... all politicians (and military generals are
> > politicians) are slime. You judge a politician by its level of sliminess.
> > None are more slimy than Hillary Clinton, except maybe her slimy husband.
>
> Heh. Hillary was, for awhile, "The most admired woman in America".
>
> --
> Q: How many members of the U.S.S. Enterprise does it take to change a
> light bulb?
> A: Seven. Scotty has to report to Captain Kirk that the light bulb in
> the Engineering Section is getting dim, at which point Kirk will send
> Bones to pronounce the bulb dead (although he'll immediately claim
> that he's a doctor, not an electrician). Scotty, after checking
> around, realizes that they have no more new light bulbs, and complains
> that he "canna" see in the dark. Kirk will make an emergency stop at
> the next uncharted planet, Alpha Regula IV, to procure a light bulb
> from the natives, who, are friendly, but seem to be hiding something.
> Kirk, Spock, Bones, Yeoman Rand and two red shirt security officers
> beam down to the planet, where the two security officers are promply
> killed by the natives, and the rest of the landing party is captured.
> As something begins to develop between the Captain and Yeoman Rand,
> Scotty, back in orbit, is attacked by a Klingon destroyer and must
> warp out of orbit. Although badly outgunned, he cripples the Klingon
> and races back to the planet in order to rescue Kirk et. al. who have
> just saved the natives' from an awful fate and, as a reward, been
> given all light bulbs they can carry. The new bulb is then inserted
> and the Enterprise continues on its five year mission.
Do you have a high school diploma? It was Melzzz who forged me (and Rudy Canoza) and bragged about it. If Rudy Canoza has 'file.pdf' open in an application such as sc and Melzzz wants to change its name to 'c.doc' via a preset script, Rudy Canoza's suggestion might be OK, if only to build a set of script tools.
Just some names Carroll has used
"Evil" John *
"Evil" Snit *
Big Crotch on a Small Fish
Cornelius Munshower
CSMA Moderator
Edward Stanfield
Fretwiz *
Hitman Hero
Measles
Petruzzellis Kids
Sigmond
Slaveen
Smit
Steve C *
Steve Camoll *
Steve Carroll <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> *
Steve Carroll <stevecarroll@xxxxxxxxxxx> *
Steve Carroll <trollkiller@xxxxxx> *
Steve Carroll's Dog *
Steve Carrolll *
Steve Carrroll *
Yevette Owens
Yobo_Obyo
--
Puppy Videos
http://jeff-relf.me/Cola_Regs.HTM
http://www.5z8.info/stalin-will-rise-again_j3h5uj_nakedgrandmas.jpg
Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 19:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q1vtkf$g39$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #485007 |
On 2019-01-19, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On 2019-01-17, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>> RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>> >>>> I don't think Trump is any more corrupt than any politician. He's just more >>>> blunt about it than the average slimy, sneak-behind-your-back, reptilian >>>> politician. Trump is definitely less slimy than Hillary Clinton, who was >>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>> >>> LMAO. You've been watching too many "Apprentice" episodes. >> >> Sorry, never watched a single episode. I do know, however, that Hillary >> Clinton oozes slime. I've known it for years, long before she felt entitled >> to run for president with basically zero qualifications. > > If you don't count having been a lawyer, a First Lady, a Senator, and > a Secretary of State. I don't count being a lawyer or First Lady as qualifications to be president. She became a Senator because she was a former "First Lady." (Whoop-dee-doo.) As a Senator she basically did nothing. And she was named Secretary of State because of her political connections, it had nothing to do with her qualifications. As it turned out, she was a terrible and corrupt Secretary of State, using her position to enrich the Clinton Foundation, which is why she used an illegal, private e-mail server to hide emails from government oversight. No, she was not qualified to be president. Her vindictive, small-minded personality makes her even less qualified. She has all the sleaze of her husband without his charisma. Terrible choice by the Democrats. She is WHY there is a President Trump. >>>> able to walk away after purposely disobeying the law and exposing classified >>>> information on her personal email server. But slimy Comey thought that was >>>> "A-OK." >>> >>> No he didn't. He probably cost Hillary the election. >> >> Hillary Clinton should be in prison for this. > > What, for hiring an idiot to administer her IT systems? No, for purposely breaking the law by putting classified government email on a private server. Quit pretending to be obtuse about this fact. >>> And yet General Petraeus, who gave away classified information deliberately, >>> is, AFAIK, a television pundit. >>> >>> Go figure. >> >> Back to the beginning ... all politicians (and military generals are >> politicians) are slime. You judge a politician by its level of sliminess. >> None are more slimy than Hillary Clinton, except maybe her slimy husband. > > Heh. Hillary was, for awhile, "The most admired woman in America". Right. Named so by the liars in the mainstream media. They also gave her an above 95% probability of winning the presidency, even though NO ONE was coming to her rallies. She even had to pay people to come to the Democrat Convention. In the real world she was seen as vindictive and small-minded (and a sleazy liar) whose sledge-hammer corruption got her the nomination (the second, after failing the first time). -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-17 21:35 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <6d0c4e8e-0e17-441f-b62e-6049c477668c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #484751 |
On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 3:46:39 AM UTC-7, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
> > I don't think Trump is any more corrupt than any politician. He's just more
> > blunt about it than the average slimy, sneak-behind-your-back, reptilian
> > politician. Trump is definitely less slimy than Hillary Clinton, who was
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> LMAO. You've been watching too many "Apprentice" episodes.
>
> > able to walk away after purposely disobeying the law and exposing classified
> > information on her personal email server. But slimy Comey thought that was
> > "A-OK."
>
> No he didn't. He probably cost Hillary the election.
>
> And yet General Petraeus, who gave away classified information deliberately,
> is, AFAIK, a television pundit.
>
> Go figure.
>
> --
> Be free and open and breezy! Enjoy! Things won't get any better so
> get used to it.
Carroll, 4/10/2015 4:04 PM:
-----
Cute trick... To the guy who hacked my Google account.
-----
No details. Seems to treat it as a joke.
Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:02 PM, <https://goo.gl/51rsmZ>:
-----
Email Hacking Is A Serious Crime
-----
No longer "cute"... now it is a serious crime. OK.
Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:07 PM:
By now he is posting more links to how serious this crime against him is.
Carroll, 4/10/2015 7:25 PM:
-----
I didn't write that.
-----
Now he is denying the posts from his own account. OK, he was "hacked". Someone else posted this. Hard to hack a gmail account given how they use two-step authentication and someone would need access to his phone or the like... but at least POSSIBLE.
Even then, though, if someone tries to guess your password Google alerts you and lets you know what IP address and other info. I know because someone in a Denver internet cafe has tried mine on several occasions.
Google even forces you to change your password when this happens. Very hard to hack these days.
So already Carroll's story is unlikely.
But let us accept it... someone somehow hacked his account bypassing the two step verification. This person did not, however, change his password and Carroll posted within an hour of the "hacker". Before that, unless he is an idiot, he changed his password and the "hacker" was locked out. The "hacker" got one post in.
But Carroll could not leave his story there.
Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:36 PM, <https://goo.gl/NJ2bMH>:
-----
Someone hacked my fretwizzer gmail acct so, for the time being,
don't trust anything from it.
-----
Wait. What? Even after Carroll figured out this "hacker" who was too stupid to change his password had broken into his account and Carroll *surely* must have changed his own password, he is saying the "hacker" might still have access. Might be able to break Google's two-step verification process *again*.
This is *very* unlikely... to the point of being unbelievable.
Even worse for him: he notes which of his accounts he is claiming was hacked - but in the past he has denied even using the other accounts! LOL! He screwed up and made it very clear he has multiple accounts and felt the need to note which one. He made the same mistake in the next quote where he speaks of WHICH of his gmail accounts he is claiming was hacked. Oops! If he only posts with one there would be no need to specify which one!
He has completely screwed up in his game to pretend he posts with only one gmail account. Completely idiotic of him, too!
Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:38 PM, <https://goo.gl/YA7gMO>:
-----
Some mentally deficient child hacked my 'fretwizzer' gmail account
so I may have to kill it. For the time being, don't assume
anything that's coming from it was written by me.
-----
He is still saying that he may have to kill the account instead of just changing the password which anyone with half a brain would have already done (and Google *forces* you to do when someone even tries to hack your account... I know because someone in the Denver area has tried to hack mine multiple times... likely Carroll but I have no proof of this). And he specifies WHICH of his accounts! He is directly admitting he uses more than one account! His claim of being "forged" with his second account is a lie. Proved.
Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:40 PM, <https://goo.gl/j6yCuV>:
-----
Looks like it's still being hacked despite me taking precautions,
I may have to kill the account.
-----
What makes it look like its still being hacked? And what precautions other than changing the two-step verification options does he need? And how would someone bypass this... is he really on the NSA watch list? Seems you would need someone at that level to be doing this. He watches too much TV where they computer hackers spend thirty seconds and bypass all security.
Just nonsense.
Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:05 PM:
-----
Apparently Google is having issues with their accounts to the
point where they're ready to undertake some additional measures.
-----
But, of course, no evidence of this... and what measures? They already alert users if someone else tries to guess your password and use two-step authentication and even force you to make a new password if it seems someone is trying to hack you.
-----
They're now involving several federal agencies in things they
didn't bother with previously in an effort to deal with people who
hack into accounts. They've asked me to leave the account open.
-----
So now Google is letting Carroll know how they are handling these things - and asking him to leave a *hacked* account open... one someone can be using to steal his identity. No. This does not pass the sniff test in any way. Even if they were doing this for some bizarre sting operation, which is in itself far fetched, they would have told Carroll to not make it public information so the hacker would not know.
Just insanity. His own story is so idiotic and full of idiotic claims it simply cannot be true. Carroll uses his secondary Google account - the one he accesses via Tor and is referred to as his Tor account - to have plausible deniability for things he says there. Now he is working to do the same thing with his main account. Maybe Carroll read a report like this: <http://cnnmon.ie/111QeT8> [money.com]. If so he missed the part where they note if you are *really* hacked, which is rare, the hackers change your password and lock you out. Why would they not?
-----
There's some new legislation that will help them deal with this
issue... which probably means more BS for us ;)
-----
Yes, new legislation to make sure Carroll does not have to deal with "hackers" and "forgers" which do not even exist.
The funny part is, this happened shortly after someone in the Denver area, likely Carroll, tried to guess *my* passwords and they did it from an Internet café (Google tells you the IP and that can be used to trace back).
My guess: Carroll is the one who was working to guess my password and figured this new lie of his was a good way to deny his own words even more than he does with his Tor account *and* a way to make it so if I had talked about him trying to hack my account he could say I was just copying his comments. "Proving" I read his posts... which for now I am to see how absurd his lies are. :)
Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:25 PM:
-----
The person who hacked into my Gmail acct. changed the wording on
this post. I've removed the others but Google asked me to leave
one standing for some odd reason.
-----
Here Carroll claims the hacker changed the wording on a post of his from *before* he had even claimed he was hacked. So this hacker not only can *post* for him but edit his old Usenet posts.
I call utter bullshit on this. Out and out lie from Carroll. And then Carroll says Google asked him to not delete these "hacked" posts... this is nonsense. Why would Google want him to leave forged posts in the public and why would Google not just keep their own copy? Even Carroll notes it is for "some odd reason" - yeah, because Carroll is telling stories that make *no* sense at all.
Carroll is lying. Maybe there is some kernel of truth to his stories? Even if so - and frankly it is unlikely he will ever show any evidence to back his claims - the details he is posting are absurd.
Carroll, 4/11/2015 2:10 PM:
-----
And he's so high he thinks people still have to manually enter all
their passwords in whenever they want to use anything that's been
password protected ;)
-----
Nobody had suggested, hinted, implied, or said anything like what Carroll says they did.
Maybe his story will be someone stole his laptop (or mobile device) and he had his passwords saved? If so why not have the device deactivated remotely? Why has he not said anything about this?
My guess: he realizes he screwed up when trying to guess my passwords and is now building a story so he can say his computer was stolen and it was not him. Or, LOL, maybe someone broke into his house and did it.
This unknown hacker knew he was obsessed with me and carried on acting like him. Makes complete sense, eh?
Carroll, 4/12/2015 8:45 AM, <https://goo.gl/KMf4pa>:
-----
The first one, that has since been deleted. My bad for having such
a feeble password on this account.
-----
Now he suggests it was merely from someone guessing his password - which contradicts his above insinuations that it could have been from a saved password on a device he had.
His story changes with the telling.
But as noted, when someone tries to guess your password Google has ways to deal with it. I know - Carroll or someone in his neck of the woods recently tried it with me.
Carroll, 4/12/2015 9:29 AM:
-----
The account in question here is a gmail account. Contrary to
Snit's delusions, I have no idea what a TOR account looks like but
it's a good bet it doesn't bear much of a resemblance to a gmail
account.
-----
Here Carroll plays stupid and pretends that if when he or anyone uses the Tor browser *Carroll* pointed to this somehow changes the way the gmail interface looks. Um, no. Worse it might do is make Google think you are in another country and you would have to set it back to English. But the basic look stays the same.
He is playing stupid and pretending to not know how the Tor browser he pointed to works. Just idiotic of him.
-----
That idiocy aside, I love how Snit has repeatedly, for years,
feigned ignorance about gmail accounts, yet, he keeps disclosing
info that proves he knows about them. Some fools do stuff like
this when they believe people are as stupid as the fool needs them
to be ;)
-----
I do not think Google would allow you to edit your Usenet / groups posts but I do not use it much and do not know for sure. Seems absurd that they would... and others have now said they do not. But given how I do not use Google Groups for posting why would I know the details of their system for certain?
Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:47 PM:
-----
Your obsession with me is insane. Working with Google I now have
proof you and ebot worked together to hack me. Clever. If I press
charges against you I have to also include her so you remain safe
for now.
Do not think this is over.
-----
No evidence of working with Google on this (and all out and out lies). Carroll is making public threats based on lies.
Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:50 PM:
-----
I promised COLA your trolling days were over so you contacted ebot
and worked with her to hack my account. I might not be able to get
your ass handed to you in court over this but wait until your boss
at Yavapai College contacts you.
Maybe you should make that call first. Ask about your comments on
incest.
See if those can not be quoted.
-----
Direct lies and threats by Carroll.
Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:51 PM:
-----
You went too far this time Snit. We have trolled each other for
years but to contact ebot and get her to help you hack my account
was over a line.
-----
A complete and utter lie from Carroll.
Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:52 PM:
-----
The above post is Snit hacking my account.
-----
A complete and utter lie... more false accusations from him.
Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:53 PM:
-----
You edited those posts when you hacked my account. Do not trust
anything from my fretwizzer account now that Snit and ebot have
access to it.
-----
More unsupported claims and attacks by Carroll.
Carroll, 4/16/2015 8:56 PM:
-----
Working with Google I now have proof Snit and ebot hacked the
account. Many of the older posts were edited. You can see evidence
of this by Snit pointing to "old" posts which have been modified to
say I claimed I was his "personal newsgroup rapist", a phrase I
have never used.
-----
No evidence of Carroll working with Google. No evidence of any older posts being edited.
--
I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened!
https://youtu.be/0ZNxaaKD7-c
http://comp.os.linux.advocacy.narkive.com/711dskzA/steven-petruzzellis-admits-he-can-not-back-his-claims-about-snit
http://tinyurl.com/kmqe66h
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-11 17:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9spshFqb68U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #483907 |
On 1/11/19 8:52 AM, owl wrote: > chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> RonB wrote: >> >>> As it stands, there's no race-baiting value in this story, so it >>> just fizzled away. >>> >>> Why am I not surprised? >>> >>> RIP, Jazmine Barnes. Your black life mattered a LOT more when they thought >>> your killer was white. >> >> You're absolutely right. Immediately after the shooting, some a-holes >> were speculating that the shooting was "racially motivated", even >> though they didn't have a fscking clue as to who did it or why. >> >> I mean, since when does "whitey" drive-around shooting-up the black >> folks, especially children? It's just fscking unbelievable! >> > > I predict you will be a Republican by year's end. Just remember, as > you fight your internal battle, that it was the Democrat Party's great > Progressive icon, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who forced Japanese Americans > into concentration camps during WWII. (This of course came decades after > the Democrats' other great achievement: founding the KKK). > Hey, you want to blame Democrats for the Southern bigotry... then surely you have no issue with Democrats working to remove the symbols of slavery and oppression that have been in the national spotlight over the last few years. Right? You want those horrid symbols taken out of areas of respect and put into the museums they belong in to teach the history we should never repeat. Right? Right? No. Of course not. And your argument just blew up. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-11 16:24 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <896c2cc9-c4ae-495e-9266-c22add0b4428@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #483907 |
On Friday, January 11, 2019 at 8:52:54 AM UTC-7, owl wrote: > chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > > RonB wrote: > > > >>As it stands, there's no race-baiting value in this story, so it > >>just fizzled away. > >> > >>Why am I not surprised? > >> > >>RIP, Jazmine Barnes. Your black life mattered a LOT more when they thought > >>your killer was white. > > > > You're absolutely right. Immediately after the shooting, some a-holes > > were speculating that the shooting was "racially motivated", even > > though they didn't have a fscking clue as to who did it or why. > > > > I mean, since when does "whitey" drive-around shooting-up the black > > folks, especially children? It's just fscking unbelievable! > > > > I predict you will be a Republican by year's end. Just remember, as > you fight your internal battle, that it was the Democrat Party's great > Progressive icon, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who forced Japanese Americans > into concentration camps during WWII. (This of course came decades after > the Democrats' other great achievement: founding the KKK). <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XU0Cb9mNCPs>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-11 17:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9sqhjFqg10U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #483994 |
On 1/11/19 5:24 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Friday, January 11, 2019 at 8:52:54 AM UTC-7, owl wrote: >> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> RonB wrote: >>> >>>> As it stands, there's no race-baiting value in this story, so it >>>> just fizzled away. >>>> >>>> Why am I not surprised? >>>> >>>> RIP, Jazmine Barnes. Your black life mattered a LOT more when they thought >>>> your killer was white. >>> >>> You're absolutely right. Immediately after the shooting, some a-holes >>> were speculating that the shooting was "racially motivated", even >>> though they didn't have a fscking clue as to who did it or why. >>> >>> I mean, since when does "whitey" drive-around shooting-up the black >>> folks, especially children? It's just fscking unbelievable! >>> >> >> I predict you will be a Republican by year's end. Just remember, as >> you fight your internal battle, that it was the Democrat Party's great >> Progressive icon, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who forced Japanese Americans >> into concentration camps during WWII. (This of course came decades after >> the Democrats' other great achievement: founding the KKK). > > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XU0Cb9mNCPs> > How the Republican Party went from Lincoln to Trump https://youtu.be/s8VOM8ET1WU -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-11 16:53 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <f949647e-fc4d-4903-9e60-09fcff4bad44@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #483994 |
On Friday, January 11, 2019 at 5:24:54 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Friday, January 11, 2019 at 8:52:54 AM UTC-7, owl wrote: > > chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > > > RonB wrote: > > > > > >>As it stands, there's no race-baiting value in this story, so it > > >>just fizzled away. > > >> > > >>Why am I not surprised? > > >> > > >>RIP, Jazmine Barnes. Your black life mattered a LOT more when they thought > > >>your killer was white. > > > > > > You're absolutely right. Immediately after the shooting, some a-holes > > > were speculating that the shooting was "racially motivated", even > > > though they didn't have a fscking clue as to who did it or why. > > > > > > I mean, since when does "whitey" drive-around shooting-up the black > > > folks, especially children? It's just fscking unbelievable! > > > > > > > I predict you will be a Republican by year's end. Just remember, as > > you fight your internal battle, that it was the Democrat Party's great > > Progressive icon, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who forced Japanese Americans > > into concentration camps during WWII. (This of course came decades after > > the Democrats' other great achievement: founding the KKK). > > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XU0Cb9mNCPs> If Klaus Schadenfreude has 'some_file.pdf' open in a user space program such as vim and you want to change its name to 'c.txt' via a bash script, Klaus Schadenfreude's method might be good. Unity is perhaps my second favorite DE and the only one I recommend to Windows users. Primary interface is Enlightenment, though. A large number of core applications is all you need after all. What did you hope for from the lying imbecile? That Just Wondering knuckle-dragger has nothing to squander but time. He has nothing else. Especially not ambition. -- Top 15 Ways Just Wondering Trolls https://youtu.be/qwb1Ez0GWMA http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/BilkHelp.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4xD43Khhkw Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-12 17:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <s9a0b80t.a3o@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #483994 |
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, January 11, 2019 at 8:52:54 AM UTC-7, owl wrote: >> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> > RonB wrote: >> > >> >>As it stands, there's no race-baiting value in this story, so it >> >>just fizzled away. >> >> >> >>Why am I not surprised? >> >> >> >>RIP, Jazmine Barnes. Your black life mattered a LOT more when they thought >> >>your killer was white. >> > >> > You're absolutely right. Immediately after the shooting, some a-holes >> > were speculating that the shooting was "racially motivated", even >> > though they didn't have a fscking clue as to who did it or why. >> > >> > I mean, since when does "whitey" drive-around shooting-up the black >> > folks, especially children? It's just fscking unbelievable! >> > >> >> I predict you will be a Republican by year's end. Just remember, as >> you fight your internal battle, that it was the Democrat Party's great >> Progressive icon, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who forced Japanese Americans >> into concentration camps during WWII. (This of course came decades after >> the Democrats' other great achievement: founding the KKK). > > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XU0Cb9mNCPs> Great interview. Unfortunately, the people who need to watch it most will be too blinded by their own preconceptions to bother.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-12 12:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9uum8Fa7ouU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #484065 |
On 1/12/19 10:37 AM, owl wrote: > Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Friday, January 11, 2019 at 8:52:54 AM UTC-7, owl wrote: >>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> RonB wrote: >>>> >>>>> As it stands, there's no race-baiting value in this story, so it >>>>> just fizzled away. >>>>> >>>>> Why am I not surprised? >>>>> >>>>> RIP, Jazmine Barnes. Your black life mattered a LOT more when they thought >>>>> your killer was white. >>>> >>>> You're absolutely right. Immediately after the shooting, some a-holes >>>> were speculating that the shooting was "racially motivated", even >>>> though they didn't have a fscking clue as to who did it or why. >>>> >>>> I mean, since when does "whitey" drive-around shooting-up the black >>>> folks, especially children? It's just fscking unbelievable! >>>> >>> >>> I predict you will be a Republican by year's end. Just remember, as >>> you fight your internal battle, that it was the Democrat Party's great >>> Progressive icon, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who forced Japanese Americans >>> into concentration camps during WWII. (This of course came decades after >>> the Democrats' other great achievement: founding the KKK). >> >> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XU0Cb9mNCPs> > > Great interview. Unfortunately, the people who need to watch it most > will be too blinded by their own preconceptions to bother. > The guy is insane. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinesh_D%27Souza#Mocking_survivors_of_school_shootings ----- In February 2018, D'Souza was widely criticized for a series of tweets which mocked the survivors of the Stoneman Douglas High School shooting.[113][114] In response to a photo of survivors reacting to Florida lawmakers voting down a proposed ban on assault weapons in the aftermath of the shooting, D'Souza tweeted "worst news since their parents told them to get summer jobs".[114][115] D'Souza's comments were condemned by both liberal and conservative commentators. Jonathan M. Katz wrote, "Let it never be said that Dinesh does not actively root for the death of children."[114] Others accused D'Souza of "trolling kids".[114][116][117] D'Souza was also denounced by Conservative Political Action Conference, which removed him from the roster of speakers, and called his comments "indefensible".[114] ----- -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-12 12:46 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <cdc45d84-4cb2-4541-9399-746f6574564c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #484065 |
On Saturday, January 12, 2019 at 10:37:42 AM UTC-7, owl wrote: > Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Friday, January 11, 2019 at 8:52:54 AM UTC-7, owl wrote: > >> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >> > RonB wrote: > >> > > >> >>As it stands, there's no race-baiting value in this story, so it > >> >>just fizzled away. > >> >> > >> >>Why am I not surprised? > >> >> > >> >>RIP, Jazmine Barnes. Your black life mattered a LOT more when they thought > >> >>your killer was white. > >> > > >> > You're absolutely right. Immediately after the shooting, some a-holes > >> > were speculating that the shooting was "racially motivated", even > >> > though they didn't have a fscking clue as to who did it or why. > >> > > >> > I mean, since when does "whitey" drive-around shooting-up the black > >> > folks, especially children? It's just fscking unbelievable! > >> > > >> > >> I predict you will be a Republican by year's end. Just remember, as > >> you fight your internal battle, that it was the Democrat Party's great > >> Progressive icon, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who forced Japanese Americans > >> into concentration camps during WWII. (This of course came decades after > >> the Democrats' other great achievement: founding the KKK). > > > > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XU0Cb9mNCPs> > > Great interview. Unfortunately, the people who need to watch it most > will be too blinded by their own preconceptions to bother. This guy has also pointed out how pervasive the left's 'lockstep' is now, if you dare to veer from it in any way you'll be targeted for elimination/ruin/shaming, etc. If they do bother to engage it'll be with 'facts', 'evidence' and 'stats' that are full of the phrase 'most likely' and similar wishy washiness. Cited articles all have this sort of language because they know damn well that the numbers are questionable... and we all know this... but that doesn't stop people from claiming *their* cited stat is the accurate one. Some of these people can't even differentiate between a number you obviously can't possibly know and a much harder number that shows over half of the murders in the country are committed by a small percentage of the population. There's really no way to discuss anything with such a person, they're too blinded by their ideologies. I think I'd pay to see these federal employees go on a 'woe is me' tour of Black neighborhoods whining about how they aren't getting paychecks for the time being ;) They don't even realize how insulting their hypocritical whining is, nor does the media who push it. Weird.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-12 13:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q1dd80$kou$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #483907 |
owl wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> RonB wrote: >> >>>As it stands, there's no race-baiting value in this story, so it >>>just fizzled away. >>> >>>Why am I not surprised? >>> >>>RIP, Jazmine Barnes. Your black life mattered a LOT more when they thought >>>your killer was white. >> >> You're absolutely right. Immediately after the shooting, some a-holes >> were speculating that the shooting was "racially motivated", even >> though they didn't have a fscking clue as to who did it or why. >> >> I mean, since when does "whitey" drive-around shooting-up the black >> folks, especially children? It's just fscking unbelievable! > > I predict you will be a Republican by year's end. Just remember, as > you fight your internal battle, that it was the Democrat Party's great > Progressive icon, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who forced Japanese Americans > into concentration camps during WWII. (This of course came decades after > the Democrats' other great achievement: founding the KKK). Why don't you concentrate on what's happening now? Throughout America's history, the various parties (what a party!) have come and gone or morphed into something different. And they've all taken turns doing shitty policy. Today, we have Republicans abdicating their responsibility to restrain an authoritarian prexy, just as Democrats did with Obama, though Obama was far from the wackjob who currently soils the Oval Office. And Democrats? They mean well, but are forced to crappy, desperate tactics due to not having enough people in the Senate. It's a mess, dysfunctional, and giving wayyyyy too much power to the executive, who is currently unfit for any kind of public office. -- There is a fly on your nose.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-12 11:09 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <e94134cf-494a-4a70-a47c-bc9adcad28a8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #484077 |
On Saturday, January 12, 2019 at 11:56:02 AM UTC-7, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > owl wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > > > chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >> RonB wrote: > >> > >>>As it stands, there's no race-baiting value in this story, so it > >>>just fizzled away. > >>> > >>>Why am I not surprised? > >>> > >>>RIP, Jazmine Barnes. Your black life mattered a LOT more when they thought > >>>your killer was white. > >> > >> You're absolutely right. Immediately after the shooting, some a-holes > >> were speculating that the shooting was "racially motivated", even > >> though they didn't have a fscking clue as to who did it or why. > >> > >> I mean, since when does "whitey" drive-around shooting-up the black > >> folks, especially children? It's just fscking unbelievable! > > > > I predict you will be a Republican by year's end. Just remember, as > > you fight your internal battle, that it was the Democrat Party's great > > Progressive icon, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who forced Japanese Americans > > into concentration camps during WWII. (This of course came decades after > > the Democrats' other great achievement: founding the KKK). > > Why don't you concentrate on what's happening now? > > Throughout America's history, the various parties (what a party!) have come > and gone or morphed into something different. And they've all taken turns > doing shitty policy. > > Today, we have Republicans abdicating their responsibility to restrain an > authoritarian prexy, just as Democrats did with Obama, though Obama was far > from the wackjob who currently soils the Oval Office. > > And Democrats? They mean well, but are forced to crappy, desperate tactics > due to not having enough people in the Senate. > > It's a mess, dysfunctional, and giving wayyyyy too much power to the > executive, who is currently unfit for any kind of public office. > > -- > There is a fly on your nose. Steven Petruzzellis can create a virtual machine. Of course that is not possible on anything but Linux! He is as incompetent as Sandman. Good grief, just recently Sandman was declaring himself the only "true Linux advocate", and claiming that "advocates" (in mockery-quotes just to annoy Steven Petruzzellis) are actively working against the success of desktop Linux. Why the task to view data via direct input in a mobile system? No matter, Sandman didn't list this as part of his, what would undoubtedly be, continually changing 'needs'. Sandman and Steven Petruzzellis both lie endlessly and outrageously and continue to do so. So no point in showing any further respect or restraint. By being taught by 'social warriors' like that you get phrases like 'equality'. Carried to its ultimate conclusion, the media position that it's 'partisan' for a heterosexual dude to not wish to date a child is born. -- My Snoring Solution! http://www.5z8.info/php-start_GPS_tracking-user_j3m3lg_whitepower http://comp.os.linux.advocacy.narkive.com/711dskzA/steven-petruzzellis-admits-he-can-not-back-his-claims-about-snit http://www.5z8.info/add-worm_z4r9qk_fakelogin Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-13 02:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q1e7t7$g8m$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #484077 |
On 2019-01-12, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > Why don't you concentrate on what's happening now? > > Throughout America's history, the various parties (what a party!) have come > and gone or morphed into something different. And they've all taken turns > doing shitty policy. Yep. And both parties still are. > Today, we have Republicans abdicating their responsibility to restrain an > authoritarian prexy, just as Democrats did with Obama, though Obama was far > from the wackjob who currently soils the Oval Office. What, exactly, do you suggest the Republicans do? And why? If you're talking about the partial government shutdown, the last two Democrat presidents both had FULL government shutdowns to try to force their policies through. It's one of the "tools" of the presidency. But people tend to have short memories. > And Democrats? They mean well, but are forced to crappy, desperate tactics > due to not having enough people in the Senate. I question that they mean well. They're bought and sold just like the Republicans. Especially when they say things like, "impeach the mother****." > It's a mess, dysfunctional, and giving wayyyyy too much power to the > executive, who is currently unfit for any kind of public office. Yep. It's non-functional. Kind of like the Roman Senate before the emperors took over. The one Democrat that I might be able to support is Gabbard, at least on her foreign policy views. But I see the Democrats are already attacking her, in the same way as they attack Trump. The Democrats don't have much room for tolerance. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-13 12:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q1fui6$7h4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #484134 |
RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On 2019-01-12, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >> Why don't you concentrate on what's happening now? >> >> Throughout America's history, the various parties (what a party!) have come >> and gone or morphed into something different. And they've all taken turns >> doing shitty policy. > > Yep. And both parties still are. > >> Today, we have Republicans abdicating their responsibility to restrain an >> authoritarian prexy, just as Democrats did with Obama, though Obama was far >> from the wackjob who currently soils the Oval Office. > > What, exactly, do you suggest the Republicans do? Impeach and kick out the corrupt SOB and his corrupt family. He never should have been allowed to run. He's been a corrupt bastard since long before now. >> And Democrats? They mean well, but are forced to crappy, desperate tactics >> due to not having enough people in the Senate. > > I question that they mean well. They're bought and sold just like the > Republicans. Especially when they say things like, "impeach the mother****." Not a good thing. But remember who screamed out "Fuck. You." while on the campaign trail? >> It's a mess, dysfunctional, and giving wayyyyy too much power to the >> executive, who is currently unfit for any kind of public office. > > Yep. It's non-functional. Kind of like the Roman Senate before the emperors > took over. > > The one Democrat that I might be able to support is Gabbard, at least on her > foreign policy views. But I see the Democrats are already attacking her, in > the same way as they attack Trump. The Democrats don't have much room for > tolerance. None of them (Republican, Democratic) do. Kind of funny... Joe Cunningham (D-SC) brought a six-pack to the House floor because he wanted to give it a particular person to promote laws helping craft breweries, and some Republican doofus claimed it proves Democrats are not serious. -- So so is good, very good, very excellent good: and yet it is not; it is but so so. -- William Shakespeare, "As You Like It"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | silverslimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-13 13:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <bh2n3e5t9lcsfh1sungj41nlrto68ad5r7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #484226 |
On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 12:41:00 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On 2019-01-12, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>> Why don't you concentrate on what's happening now? >>> >>> Throughout America's history, the various parties (what a party!) have come >>> and gone or morphed into something different. And they've all taken turns >>> doing shitty policy. >> >> Yep. And both parties still are. >> >>> Today, we have Republicans abdicating their responsibility to restrain an >>> authoritarian prexy, just as Democrats did with Obama, though Obama was far >>> from the wackjob who currently soils the Oval Office. >> >> What, exactly, do you suggest the Republicans do? > >Impeach and kick out the corrupt SOB and his corrupt family. >He never should have been allowed to run. He's been a corrupt bastard since >long before now. 1) You can't impeach a sitting President unless he committed some sort of crime while in office. He hasn't and there is no evidence that he has. 2) The American political system allows anyone to run, even Tyrone the street corner drug dealer as long as they are a citizen. Only leftists believe that only select people should be "allowed" to run.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-13 12:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ga1himFrpjpU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #484235 |
On 1/13/19 11:59 AM, silverslimer wrote: > On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 12:41:00 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom > <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > >> RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> On 2019-01-12, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>>> Why don't you concentrate on what's happening now? >>>> >>>> Throughout America's history, the various parties (what a party!) have come >>>> and gone or morphed into something different. And they've all taken turns >>>> doing shitty policy. >>> >>> Yep. And both parties still are. >>> >>>> Today, we have Republicans abdicating their responsibility to restrain an >>>> authoritarian prexy, just as Democrats did with Obama, though Obama was far >>>> from the wackjob who currently soils the Oval Office. >>> >>> What, exactly, do you suggest the Republicans do? >> >> Impeach and kick out the corrupt SOB and his corrupt family. >> He never should have been allowed to run. He's been a corrupt bastard since >> long before now. > > 1) You can't impeach a sitting President unless he committed some sort > of crime while in office. He hasn't and there is no evidence that he > has. There is evidence he and his team worked with the Russians. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_investigations_into_Trump_and_Russia_(2018)> And there is more just in 2019: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_investigations_into_Trump_and_Russia_(2019)> > 2) The American political system allows anyone to run, even Tyrone the > street corner drug dealer as long as they are a citizen. Only leftists > believe that only select people should be "allowed" to run. The idea that your claim represents the general view of people on the left is unsupported. And, of course, you will never support it. Remember: you lie about as often, and as poorly, as does Trump. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web