Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #485936 > unrolled thread
| Started by | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-01-25 03:21 +0000 |
| Last post | 2019-01-25 22:16 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 165 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
OT: Satan's Playground — New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 03:21 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-25 07:03 -0600
Expecting to get facts from a fruit is pure insanity Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 05:24 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground — New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 13:33 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-25 09:19 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-25 15:27 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 16:18 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 20:15 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-25 13:59 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 22:02 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-25 14:18 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 22:39 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-25 15:10 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 23:23 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-25 16:22 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-26 07:19 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-26 17:36 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-30 07:22 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-30 14:45 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:14 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-30 15:56 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 08:02 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-30 16:13 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 08:16 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 02:25 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-30 10:19 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-30 16:00 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-31 07:05 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-30 10:18 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-30 10:24 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-30 16:01 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 02:27 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 08:34 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-30 15:59 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-03 19:25 -0700
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-30 15:56 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-03 19:23 -0700
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 02:23 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 02:21 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-30 15:53 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-31 07:20 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 16:22 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 02:20 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 22:07 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-26 21:51 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground — New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 07:31 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-25 10:06 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground — New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 09:10 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground — New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 16:17 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-25 12:33 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 20:12 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-25 16:44 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 23:17 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-28 08:11 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 20:04 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-25 16:42 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 21:50 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 23:11 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 23:25 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 23:29 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-26 22:03 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 04:13 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-27 05:49 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 07:44 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-27 09:40 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-27 09:54 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 10:27 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-27 18:43 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-27 15:16 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 16:45 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-28 04:33 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 08:17 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-28 10:05 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 12:44 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-28 18:21 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 20:00 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-29 03:32 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-29 08:41 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 17:45 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 08:14 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-29 09:44 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 10:44 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-29 20:25 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 07:58 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-30 09:42 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 11:04 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-31 05:19 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 06:50 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 06:58 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-31 08:58 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 10:39 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-31 11:33 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 11:58 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 12:23 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-31 12:31 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-31 21:11 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-31 13:20 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-31 21:47 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 22:48 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 06:52 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 07:25 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-01 11:08 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 11:36 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 11:50 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-01 13:24 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 11:15 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 11:52 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-03 19:27 -0700
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-03 19:28 -0700
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-01 20:25 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-01 14:31 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-01 13:28 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 13:56 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-01 22:04 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 14:27 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Tommy B <riceornice8p@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 23:11 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 15:15 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 21:48 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 07:42 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-04 07:11 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York flyer <snowflyer09o@gmail.com> - 2019-02-04 13:53 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-02 04:49 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 05:22 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-02 16:06 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 08:29 -0800
You can't forge the "Path:" line. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-02 10:51 -0800
Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-02 10:57 -0800
Re: Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 11:21 -0800
Re: Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 12:08 -0800
Re: Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-05 00:20 -0600
Re: Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-04 22:49 -0800
Re: Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-04 23:52 -0800
ProtonMail. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-04 23:05 -0800
Re: PutinMail. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-05 01:07 -0600
Re: ProtonMail. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-04 23:21 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-02 12:16 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 12:39 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-02 20:58 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-02 14:12 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 14:29 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-03 18:46 +0000
Google Groups doesn't let you alter the IP adress. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-02 10:45 -0800
Re: Google Groups doesn't let you alter the IP adress. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-02 19:02 +0000
You can't forge the "Path:" line, grasshopper. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-02 11:06 -0800
Re: You can't forge the "Path:" line, grasshopper. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-02 19:08 +0000
_YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-02 11:28 -0800
Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-05 00:29 -0600
_YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-04 22:58 -0800
Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-05 14:11 -0600
Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-05 13:16 -0500
Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-05 13:59 -0800
Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-05 17:31 -0500
Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2019-02-05 22:47 +0000
Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-05 14:54 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 12:54 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-31 17:48 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-31 22:32 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-28 12:16 -0700
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-27 23:39 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 08:31 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-28 07:18 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-25 12:31 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-25 12:26 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground — New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-25 14:09 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground — New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 22:16 +0000
Page 1 of 9 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 03:21 +0000 |
| Subject | OT: Satan's Playground — New York |
| Message-ID | <q2dvbg$ioo$1@dont-email.me> |
This is how much I don't follow the news. I didn't even know (until a relative told me) that New York now allows full term babies to be murdered. They murder them with a lethal injection (so long as the baby is still inside the mother). Lethal injection is not even allowed for murderers in New York. But, in New York it is now legal for the ghouls give the baby a lethal injection. And, if the baby somehow survives, in excruciating pain, they give him or her another lethal injection in 24 hours. And the liberal libtard ghouls who voted for this bullshit have the gall to take Trump to task for allowing illegal alien children to separated from their illegal alien parents. The ultimate in lying hypocrisy. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 07:03 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York |
| Message-ID | <a62m4etsodlug0h26ljd13d0nbhkm79kdf@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #485936 |
RonB wrote: >New York now allows full term babies to be murdered. Evidence, please. -- 'You (the lame Linux "community") have always decided on one "best distro".' - DumFSck, lying shamelessly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 05:24 -0800 |
| Subject | Expecting to get facts from a fruit is pure insanity |
| Message-ID | <3808c31c-69cf-4fd8-843b-4ebd70ba7557@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #485939 |
On Friday, January 25, 2019 at 8:03:51 AM UTC-5, chrisv wrote: > RonB wrote: > > >New York now allows full term babies to be murdered. > > Evidence, please. Facts don't matter to the IMMORAL LEFT. RonB is a resident Fruit on COLA. Expecting to get facts from a fruit is pure insanity.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 13:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q2f37c$169n$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #485939 |
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 07:03:48 -0600, chrisv wrote: > RonB wrote: > >>New York now allows full term babies to be murdered. > > Evidence, please. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/new-york-celebrates-legalizing-abortion- until-birth-as-catholic-bishops-question-cuomos-faith
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 09:19 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York |
| Message-ID | <9u9m4edc545a7ganotvp57feiqv40rk0fp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #485941 |
Amanda KoXXX wrote: > chrisv wrote: >> >> Evidence, please. > >https://www.foxnews.com/politics/new-york-celebrates-legalizing-abortion-until-birth-as-catholic-bishops-question-cuomos-faith "if the woman's health is endangered or if the fetus is not viable." Changes things, a bit, eh? -- "If Linux had gotten to the market on time and would have been presented in an effective way, many more people would be using it, too. But that did not happen and the chance is forever lost." - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 15:27 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <9z0b93ga.ahu7@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #485944 |
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > Amanda KoXXX wrote: > >> chrisv wrote: >>> >>> Evidence, please. >> >>https://www.foxnews.com/politics/new-york-celebrates-legalizing-abortion-until-birth-as-catholic-bishops-question-cuomos-faith > > "if the woman's health is endangered or if the fetus is not viable." > > Changes things, a bit, eh? > http://www.bpnews.net/52299/ny-abortion-bill--alarming-in-every-sense <quote> The new law legalizes abortion until birth for the mother's "health," which is not defined and has been interpreted by the Supreme Court to include, in essence, any reason. ... While the Supreme Court struck down state laws in its Roe decision in 1973, a companion ruling -- Doe v. Bolton -- had the effect of legalizing abortion "on demand," as pro-lifers have described it. In Doe, the high court provided an exception from state regulations of abortion for "maternal health," which it defined as "all factors -- physical, emotional, psychological, familial and the woman's age -- relevant to the well-being of the patient." </quote>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 16:18 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <q2fcsr$169n$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #485945 |
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 15:27:16 +0000, owl wrote: > chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> Amanda KoXXX wrote: >> >>> chrisv wrote: >>>> >>>> Evidence, please. >>> >>>https://www.foxnews.com/politics/new-york-celebrates-legalizing- abortion-until-birth-as-catholic-bishops-question-cuomos-faith >> >> "if the woman's health is endangered or if the fetus is not viable." >> >> Changes things, a bit, eh? >> >> > http://www.bpnews.net/52299/ny-abortion-bill--alarming-in-every-sense > <quote> > The new law legalizes abortion until birth for the mother's "health," > which is not defined and has been interpreted by the Supreme Court to > include, in essence, any reason. > ... > While the Supreme Court struck down state laws in its Roe decision in > 1973, a companion ruling -- Doe v. Bolton -- had the effect of > legalizing abortion "on demand," as pro-lifers have described it. In > Doe, the high court provided an exception from state regulations of > abortion for "maternal health," which it defined as "all factors -- > physical, emotional, psychological, familial and the woman's age -- > relevant to the well-being of the patient." > </quote> Exactly. Thank you for posting this.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 20:15 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <q2fqpi$q4u$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #485945 |
On 2019-01-25, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> Amanda KoXXX wrote: >> >>> chrisv wrote: >>>> >>>> Evidence, please. >>> >>>https://www.foxnews.com/politics/new-york-celebrates-legalizing-abortion-until-birth-as-catholic-bishops-question-cuomos-faith >> >> "if the woman's health is endangered or if the fetus is not viable." >> >> Changes things, a bit, eh? >> > > http://www.bpnews.net/52299/ny-abortion-bill--alarming-in-every-sense ><quote> > The new law legalizes abortion until birth for the mother's "health," > which is not defined and has been interpreted by the Supreme Court to > include, in essence, any reason. > ... > While the Supreme Court struck down state laws in its Roe decision in > 1973, a companion ruling -- Doe v. Bolton -- had the effect of legalizing > abortion "on demand," as pro-lifers have described it. In Doe, the > high court provided an exception from state regulations of abortion > for "maternal health," which it defined as "all factors -- physical, > emotional, psychological, familial and the woman's age -- relevant to > the well-being of the patient." ></quote> In other words, murdering unborn babies is now legal at ANY time in the pregnancy in New York. And a doctor doesn't even have to be involved any longer. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 13:59 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <dafb46ef-b7c7-4690-bfd1-be991525ed14@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #485964 |
RonB wrote: >On 2019-01-25, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> Amanda KoXXX wrote: >>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Evidence, please. >>>> >>>>https://www.foxnews.com/politics/new-york-celebrates-legalizing-abortion-until-birth-as-catholic-bishops-question-cuomos-faith >>> >>> "if the woman's health is endangered or if the fetus is not viable." >>> >>> Changes things, a bit, eh? It changes things entirely. First, it means that RonB’s original claim contained critical omissions, which is ironic considering that he accused others of doing that. Second, others are failing to understand why there’s the law and then there’s the regulations which is where the details of implementation are defined. As such, to claim “no doctor involved” is false until such time that the implementing regs have been written, undergone public review/comment, & finalized. >> http://www.bpnews.net/52299/ny-abortion-bill--alarming-in-every-sense >><quote> >> The new law legalizes abortion until birth for the mother's "health," >> which is not defined and has been interpreted by the Supreme Court to >> include, in essence, any reason. >> ... >> While the Supreme Court struck down state laws in its Roe decision in >> 1973, a companion ruling -- Doe v. Bolton -- had the effect of legalizing >> abortion "on demand," as pro-lifers have described it. In Doe, the >> high court provided an exception from state regulations of abortion >> for "maternal health," which it defined as "all factors -- physical, >> emotional, psychological, familial and the woman's age -- relevant to >> the well-being of the patient." >></quote> So? Just because something hasn’t been defined at the SCOTUS doesn't mean that it hasn’t been defined by someone, somewhere. But of course because the SCOTUS has reviewed the subject, this is a pretty good indicator that they found that whatever definition didn’t rise to a point of contention needing comment. > In other words, murdering unborn babies is now legal at ANY time in the > pregnancy in New York. Factually incorrect...but if you really wish to put this to the test, I’ll pay for your mom to bring you with her to NYC and because of all the mental anguish & distress you’ve caused her, your interpretation allows her to legally put you to death at age 63 (or whatever age you are now). Feeling lucky, punk? /s > And a doctor doesn't even have to be involved any longer. Only if it explicitly authorized someone to make a medical decision in lieu of a doctor, so just where is that written? -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 22:02 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <q2g11r$1kn6$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #485970 |
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 13:59:34 -0800, -hh wrote: > RonB wrote: >>On 2019-01-25, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> Amanda KoXXX wrote: >>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Evidence, please. >>>>> >>>>>https://www.foxnews.com/politics/new-york-celebrates-legalizing- abortion-until-birth-as-catholic-bishops-question-cuomos-faith >>>> >>>> "if the woman's health is endangered or if the fetus is not viable." >>>> >>>> Changes things, a bit, eh? > > It changes things entirely. First, it means that RonB’s original claim > contained critical omissions, which is ironic considering that he > accused others of doing that. > > Second, others are failing to understand why there’s the law and then > there’s the regulations which is where the details of implementation are > defined. As such, > to claim “no doctor involved” is false until such time that the > implementing regs have been written, undergone public review/comment, & > finalized. > >>> http://www.bpnews.net/52299/ny-abortion-bill--alarming-in-every-sense >>><quote> >>> The new law legalizes abortion until birth for the mother's "health," >>> which is not defined and has been interpreted by the Supreme Court to >>> include, in essence, any reason. >>> ... >>> While the Supreme Court struck down state laws in its Roe decision in >>> 1973, a companion ruling -- Doe v. Bolton -- had the effect of >>> legalizing abortion "on demand," as pro-lifers have described it. In >>> Doe, the high court provided an exception from state regulations of >>> abortion for "maternal health," which it defined as "all factors -- >>> physical, emotional, psychological, familial and the woman's age -- >>> relevant to the well-being of the patient." >>></quote> > > So? Just because something hasn’t been defined at the SCOTUS doesn't > mean that it hasn’t been defined by someone, somewhere. But of course > because the SCOTUS has reviewed the subject, this is a pretty good > indicator that they found that whatever definition didn’t rise to a > point of contention needing comment. > >> In other words, murdering unborn babies is now legal at ANY time in the >> pregnancy in New York. > > Factually incorrect...but if you really wish to put this to the test, > I’ll pay for your mom to bring you with her to NYC and because of all > the mental anguish & distress you’ve caused her, your interpretation > allows her to legally put you to death at age 63 (or whatever age you > are now). Feeling lucky, punk? /s > >> And a doctor doesn't even have to be involved any longer. > > Only if it explicitly authorized someone to make a medical decision in > lieu of a doctor, so just where is that written? > > -hh Whoooooooooooooooooooooooosh. Way to miss the point. You can't see the forest for the trees, hh. It's baby killing, plain and simple. Why do you write dissertations as replies to posts? Do you think you get extra credit based upon the number of words?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 14:18 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <817df8b2-b4c6-40ce-aeea-e6e6e67d3c2a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #485971 |
Some new sock puppet writes: > Whoooooooooooooooooooooooosh. > > Way to miss the point. Nope: I saw that RonB was not only lying, but doing so in a way that he’s a hypocrite. >You can't see the forest for the trees, hh. > It's baby killing, plain and simple. Oh, I know what it is. And the Pope also said that the holier-than-thou assholes who preach only about abortions are off base: “Francis also argued that while opposition to abortion is an important hallmark of the Catholic faith, it shouldn’t be used as a wedge issue, or replace a wider concern for Catholic social justice. Critiquing those for whom “the only thing that counts is one particular ethical issue or cause that they themselves defend,” Francis wrote: Our defence of the innocent unborn, for example, needs to be clear, firm and passionate, for at stake is the dignity of a human life, which is always sacred and demands love for each person, regardless of his or her stage of development. Equally sacred, however, are the lives of the poor, those already born, the destitute, the abandoned and the underprivileged, the vulnerable infirm and elderly exposed to covert euthanasia, the victims of human trafficking, new forms of slavery, and every form of rejection.” <https://www.vox.com/2018/4/11/17220108/pope-francis-catholics-conservative-abortion-gaudete-exsultate-twitter-church-apostolic-exhortation> TL;DR: stop fucking cherry-picking...shove it up your “Wall”. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 22:39 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <q2g36n$1kn6$5@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #485975 |
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 14:18:12 -0800, -hh wrote: > Some new sock puppet writes: >> Whoooooooooooooooooooooooosh. >> >> Way to miss the point. > > Nope: I saw that RonB was not only lying, but doing so in a way that > he’s a hypocrite. Save it. It's murdering babies and if you can't see that you have a serious problem. You can try and explain it away but it is what it is. Like I said, you'll make a great stand up philosopher. You were just born ~ 2000 years too late. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oBIxGjSHzF8
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 15:10 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <7d23973c-5a8e-49d3-aca9-a9dc564bc8dd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #485976 |
Amanda KoXXX soxkpippet wrote: >-hh wrote: >> Some new sock puppet writes: >>> Whoooooooooooooooooooooooosh. >>> Way to miss the point. >> >> Nope: I saw that RonB was not only lying, but doing so in a way that >> he’s a hypocrite. > >Save it. > It's murdering babies and if you can't see that you have a serious > problem. Quite the opposite: I recognize it is a problem, particularly in how the current Administration’s policies are perversely increasing the abortion rate. > You can try and explain it away but it is what it is. Nope. I just recognize the holistic nature of the topic. Case in point, if you’re a “save them” at all costs, where have you supported policies which minimizes all starving children in America? Including safe drinking water too, right? Or are you YA hypocrite who demands the birth for the supposed good of society Air something, but if the Mother does that but can’t adequately care for the child and asks society to help, then promptly screams “fuck ‘em! Not a dime of my money!”. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 23:23 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <q2g5p8$48h$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #485977 |
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 15:10:33 -0800, -hh wrote: > Amanda KoXXX soxkpippet wrote: >>-hh wrote: >>> Some new sock puppet writes: >>>> Whoooooooooooooooooooooooosh. >>>> Way to miss the point. >>> >>> Nope: I saw that RonB was not only lying, but doing so in a way that >>> he’s a hypocrite. >> >>Save it. >> It's murdering babies and if you can't see that you have a serious >> problem. > > Quite the opposite: I recognize it is a problem, particularly in how > the current Administration’s policies are perversely increasing the > abortion rate. Fail. Stop playing stand up philosopher and look at what is happening. This is murder, plain and simple. If you agree, I applaud you. If you don't. You will have to someday answer to a higher being. Good luck.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 16:22 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <09a03e8f-b89c-4264-9d7d-e99b04964e64@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #485980 |
Amanda KoXXX wrote: > -hh wrote: >> Amanda KoXXX sockpuppet wrote: >>>-hh wrote: >>>> Some new sock puppet writes: >>>>> Whoooooooooooooooooooooooosh. >>>>> Way to miss the point. >>>> >>>> Nope: I saw that RonB was not only lying, but doing so in a way that >>>> he’s a hypocrite. >>> >>>Save it. >>> It's murdering babies and if you can't see that you have a serious >>> problem. >> >> Quite the opposite: I recognize it is a problem, particularly in how >> the current Administration’s policies are perversely increasing the >> abortion rate. > > Fail. > Stop playing stand up philosopher and look at what is happening. Indeed, you did fail because of what you chose to delete. Here it is again: “i just recognize the holistic nature of the topic. Case in point, if you’re a “save them” at all costs, where have you supported policies which minimizes all starving children in America? Including safe drinking water too, right? Or are you YA hypocrite who demands the birth for the supposed good of society Air something, but if the Mother does that but can’t adequately care for the child and asks society to help, then promptly screams “fuck ‘em! Not a dime of my money!”.” >This is murder, plain and simple. > If you agree, I applaud you. > If you don't. > You will have to someday answer to a higher being. > Good luck. I have no qualms with answering to my maker, for I already know that I’ve passed. Of course you, with your scare tactics attempts ... won’t. You’d better wear shorts in your coffin, as it’s hot in Hell. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 07:19 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <d46017b8-22f7-4aec-97cf-2f6b336b5a3c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #485984 |
On Friday, January 25, 2019 at 5:22:42 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote: > Amanda KoXXX wrote: > > -hh wrote: > >> Amanda KoXXX sockpuppet wrote: > >>>-hh wrote: > >>>> Some new sock puppet writes: > >>>>> Whoooooooooooooooooooooooosh. > >>>>> Way to miss the point. > >>>> > >>>> Nope: I saw that RonB was not only lying, but doing so in a way that > >>>> he’s a hypocrite. > >>> > >>>Save it. > >>> It's murdering babies and if you can't see that you have a serious > >>> problem. > >> > >> Quite the opposite: I recognize it is a problem, particularly in how > >> the current Administration’s policies are perversely increasing the > >> abortion rate. > > > > Fail. > > Stop playing stand up philosopher and look at what is happening. > > Indeed, you did fail because of what you chose to delete. Here it is again: > > “i just recognize the holistic nature of the topic. Case in point, if you’re > a “save them” at all costs, where have you supported policies which minimizes > all starving children in America? Including safe drinking water too, right? You support it by placing America first for awhile again... so we'll still able to help people in other places in the future. Right now, our future doesn't look like we'll be doing much of that. You have to be able to acknowledge when you've taken on too much water. You can look at all the issues I've mentioned and not see that, an 'ability' that's becoming too commonplace by people calling themselves "liberals". CA is 'the lab', you *should* be able to see how things aren't working the way Dems said they would in that state. CA had *everything* going for it, especially the chance to show the world how the Dem party's vision could solve issues. What ended up happening is the exact opposite.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 17:36 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <gb3k4nFco01U8@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #485994 |
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, January 25, 2019 at 5:22:42 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote: >> Amanda KoXXX wrote: >>> -hh wrote: >>>> Amanda KoXXX sockpuppet wrote: >>>>> -hh wrote: >>>>>> Some new sock puppet writes: >>>>>>> Whoooooooooooooooooooooooosh. >>>>>>> Way to miss the point. >>>>>> >>>>>> Nope: I saw that RonB was not only lying, but doing so in a way that >>>>>> he’s a hypocrite. >>>>> >>>>> Save it. >>>>> It's murdering babies and if you can't see that you have a serious >>>>> problem. >>>> >>>> Quite the opposite: I recognize it is a problem, particularly in how >>>> the current Administration’s policies are perversely increasing the >>>> abortion rate. >>> >>> Fail. >>> Stop playing stand up philosopher and look at what is happening. >> >> Indeed, you did fail because of what you chose to delete. Here it is again: >> >> “i just recognize the holistic nature of the topic. Case in point, if you’re >> a “save them” at all costs, where have you supported policies which minimizes >> all starving children in America? Including safe drinking water too, right? > > You support it by placing America first for awhile again... America first. Clean water in Flint and elsewhere. Healthcare for all. Free college for those who qualify. Better power infrastructure. Better data infrastructure. Raise the minimum wage. Yes. America first would be fine. But conservatives fight against it. > so we'll > still able to help people in other places in the future. We can do both. False dichotomy on your part. > Right now, > our future doesn't look like we'll be doing much of that. You have > to be able to acknowledge when you've taken on too much water. So fight against the corporate crap that pushes that. Back Sanders. But you will not. > > You can look at all the issues I've mentioned and not see that, an > 'ability' that's becoming too commonplace by people calling > themselves "liberals". CA is 'the lab', you *should* be able to see > how things aren't working the way Dems said they would in that > state. CA had *everything* going for it, especially the chance to > show the world how the Dem party's vision could solve issues. > What ended up happening is the exact opposite. > CA is still a part of the USA. How can you not know that?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 07:22 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <hu835e9anculbodvjjj9rmjm2nb7khcto6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #485984 |
-hh wrote: >Of course you, with your scare tactics attempts ... won’t. >You’d better wear shorts in your coffin, as it’s hot in Hell. A right-winger will talk of the "sanctity of life" in the morning, and OK the carpet-bombing of a country in the afternoon. It's OK, you see, if it's not "us" who are dying. -- "Remember: I have never posted to COLA with any name other than Snit. Never. Your accusation is 100% unsupportable. It is a lie." - some thing, lying shamelessly (but no one can quote it lying)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 14:45 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <s5zb0803.aghou4@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #486148 |
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > -hh wrote: > >>Of course you, with your scare tactics attempts ... won?t. >>You?d better wear shorts in your coffin, as it?s hot in Hell. > > A right-winger will talk of the "sanctity of life" in the morning, and > OK the carpet-bombing of a country in the afternoon. > > It's OK, you see, if it's not "us" who are dying. > Like Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 09:14 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <tjf35epuok28roj3fs7mnbdci7hjjo1skd@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #486150 |
owl wrote: > chrisv wrote: >> >> A right-winger will talk of the "sanctity of life" in the morning, and >> OK the carpet-bombing of a country in the afternoon. >> >> It's OK, you see, if it's not "us" who are dying. > > Like Hiroshima and Nagasaki? I was thinking more of Vietman, but examples can be be found all over the world. Iraq, for example. -- "Why would I engage in in-depth debates when I can post 8 flames/insults and anti-Linux rhetoric in the same time period?" - some dumb fsck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 9 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web