Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #690046 > unrolled thread
| Started by | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-05-07 10:02 -0400 |
| Last post | 2025-05-08 01:29 +0000 |
| Articles | 4 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Canonical (Ubuntu) Requiring Applicants Take "DEI and Belonging" Class CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-07 10:02 -0400
Re: Canonical (Ubuntu) Requiring Applicants Take "DEI and Belonging" Class RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-05-08 00:21 +0000
Re: Canonical (Ubuntu) Requiring Applicants Take "DEI and Belonging" Class CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-07 20:25 -0400
Re: Canonical (Ubuntu) Requiring Applicants Take "DEI and Belonging" Class Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-08 01:29 +0000
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-07 10:02 -0400 |
| Subject | Canonical (Ubuntu) Requiring Applicants Take "DEI and Belonging" Class |
| Message-ID | <GJJSP.468$lbbb.283@fx18.iad> |
Yep, yet another one to throw in the bin. A few weeks ago, Lunduke suggested that they were alright except for the Snap and Mir controversies. It looks like that changed. <https://lunduke.substack.com/p/canonical-ubuntu-requiring-applicants> -- God be with you, CrudeSausage KDE & LibreOffice supporter John 14:6
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-08 00:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrn101nu7s.54eb.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home> |
| In reply to | #690046 |
On 2025-05-07, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > Yep, yet another one to throw in the bin. A few weeks ago, Lunduke > suggested that they were alright except for the Snap and Mir > controversies. It looks like that changed. > ><https://lunduke.substack.com/p/canonical-ubuntu-requiring-applicants> You also have to take into account where Canonical is located. In South Africa. That might have some effect on what's required of companies by the government. -- Jesus sat with sinners: He didn't sin with them. Know the difference.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-07 20:25 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <qSSSP.27902$9uW6.26402@fx47.iad> |
| In reply to | #690078 |
On 2025-05-07 20:21, RonB wrote: > On 2025-05-07, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >> Yep, yet another one to throw in the bin. A few weeks ago, Lunduke >> suggested that they were alright except for the Snap and Mir >> controversies. It looks like that changed. >> >> <https://lunduke.substack.com/p/canonical-ubuntu-requiring-applicants> > > You also have to take into account where Canonical is located. In South > Africa. That might have some effect on what's required of companies by the > government. > That's a good point. I just wonder why Canonical would be worried about there not being enough negroes in the company when that's the majority of South Africa. Of course, I imagine that very few of them can do anything other than murder and rape. Reading must be a real struggle. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage KDE & LibreOffice supporter John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-08 01:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrn101o26u.3f2.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> |
| In reply to | #690046 |
On 2025-05-07, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > Yep, yet another one to throw in the bin. A few weeks ago, Lunduke > suggested that they were alright except for the Snap and Mir > controversies. It looks like that changed. > ><https://lunduke.substack.com/p/canonical-ubuntu-requiring-applicants> I don't use it, but I'm going to change the only person I know who uses Ubuntu to switch. He would definately not be happy about this move from Canonical, and would be more than happy I'm sure, to move to an alternative like LMDE.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web