Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #288633 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Charlie Croyden <charlescroyden3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-04-08 19:51 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-04-09 16:12 +0000 |
| Articles | 9 — 8 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Desktop Linux Is Shit. Charlie Croyden <charlescroyden3@gmail.com> - 2015-04-08 19:51 -0700
Re: Desktop Linux Is Shit. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-09 09:57 +0200
Desktop Linux Is Whatever You Want to Make It Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-09 06:02 -0400
Jayne Ahlstrom, the Anal Whore. JermsGerms <jeremywalmartprescottaz@gmail.com> - 2015-04-09 05:51 -0700
Re: Jayne Ahlstrom, the Anal Whore. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-09 10:24 -0400
Re: Jayne Ahlstrom, the Anal Whore. Donald Miller <donaldmiller955@mail.com> - 2015-04-09 11:36 -0400
Re: Desktop Linux Is Shit. Donald Miller <donaldmiller955@mail.com> - 2015-04-09 11:37 -0400
Re: Desktop Linux Is Shit. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-04-09 05:11 -0700
Re: Desktop Linux Is Shit. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-09 16:12 +0000
| From | Charlie Croyden <charlescroyden3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-08 19:51 -0700 |
| Subject | Desktop Linux Is Shit. |
| Message-ID | <a58b467f-c873-479b-8860-6fd338750a8b@googlegroups.com> |
Why not just admit it and either improve it or move on? The fact that it still sits at 1 percent of the market even though it's free should say it all. Why not take the not so subtle hint? Seriously it's time to move on. When Microsoft can release such shit as Windows ME, and Windows 8 and still Linux can't compete it's time to reconsider the Linux desktop as a viable entity. I've tried Linux and so have millions of other people who are looking for a free alternative to Microsoft or Apple. The problem is, the vast majority of us, something like 99 percent, have reached the same conclusion and that is Linux sucks. You Linux freaks can squawk all you want about how Linux us superior but you are wasting your time because the public has spoken and they realize Linux sucks. The truth is Linux sucks. It really does and when pressed for direct application vs application comparisons you Linux oddballs run away and hide. Fact.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-09 09:57 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mg5bbi$88o$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #288633 |
Charlie Croyden wrote: > Why not just admit it and either improve it or move on? Hi flatfish Still that lying rat you have always been
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-09 06:02 -0400 |
| Subject | Desktop Linux Is Whatever You Want to Make It |
| Message-ID | <mg5il7$ue$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #288637 |
Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> Charlie Croyden wrote:
>
>> Why not just admit it and either improve it or move on?
>
> Hi flatfish
>
> Still that lying rat you have always been
Indeed.
--
<Knghtbrd> "The currency collectors are offline." "I'm rerouting though
the secondary couplings. If we re-align the phase manifold we
should be able to use the plasma inductor matrix to manually
launch a new cheesy spinoff series."
* ShadwDrgn sighs
<Phase> you leave my manifolds alone
<Phase> !
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JermsGerms <jeremywalmartprescottaz@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-09 05:51 -0700 |
| Subject | Jayne Ahlstrom, the Anal Whore. |
| Message-ID | <a04405a9-10e8-4a8a-b5f0-7e2485c40cc5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #288644 |
On Thursday, April 9, 2015 at 6:02:09 AM UTC-4, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > Indeed. > Still changing subject lines? Well you have just verified that you care more about being the big man in COLA than you do about your wife. That's sad. https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=jayne%20ahlstrom%20the%20anal%20whore
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-09 10:24 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Jayne Ahlstrom, the Anal Whore. |
| Message-ID | <mg620j$pp4$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #288665 |
On 2015-04-09 8:51 AM, JermsGerms wrote: > On Thursday, April 9, 2015 at 6:02:09 AM UTC-4, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >> Indeed. >> > > Still changing subject lines? > Well you have just verified that you care more about being the big man in COLA than you do about your wife. > That's sad. > https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=jayne%20ahlstrom%20the%20anal%20whore Thank you for saving us from the Chris AssStorm subject-line-changing menace. -- Slimer OpenMedia, GreenPeace Supporter & SPCA Paw Partner Encrypt.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Donald Miller <donaldmiller955@mail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-09 11:36 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Jayne Ahlstrom, the Anal Whore. |
| Message-ID | <vn6diat7ug40cbdard8ecsit4kaukd4siu@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #288665 |
On Thu, 9 Apr 2015 05:51:33 -0700 (PDT), JermsGerms <jeremywalmartprescottaz@gmail.com> wrote: >On Thursday, April 9, 2015 at 6:02:09 AM UTC-4, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >> Indeed. >> > >Still changing subject lines? >Well you have just verified that you care more about being the big man in COLA than you do about your wife. >That's sad. >https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=jayne%20ahlstrom%20the%20anal%20whore Why not just ignore him? Obviously he has some mental issues so why aggravate him? It's not nice to attack his family either. They aren't involved in this group and besides, they are suffering enough just having to deal with a full blown idiot like him. If you want to make a point about him changing the subject line use his name in the subject and change it back.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Donald Miller <donaldmiller955@mail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-09 11:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <q47dial9io389vd5k8c82jl93upjhjtms9@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #288637 |
On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 09:57:30 +0200, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >Charlie Croyden wrote: > >> Why not just admit it and either improve it or move on? > >Hi flatfish > >Still that lying rat you have always been That's a blast from the past. Is he still around?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-09 05:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <434e3933-dab9-4546-a39f-75fb2e3e2846@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #288633 |
On Wednesday, April 8, 2015 at 10:51:16 PM UTC-4, Charlie Croyden wrote: > Why not just admit it and either improve it or move on? > The fact that it still sits at 1 percent of the market even though it's free should say it all. Why not take the not so subtle hint? > > Seriously it's time to move on. > When Microsoft can release such shit as Windows ME, and Windows 8 and still Linux can't compete it's time to reconsider the Linux desktop as a viable entity. > > I've tried Linux and so have millions of other people who are looking for a free alternative to Microsoft or Apple. The problem is, the vast majority of us, something like 99 percent, have reached the same conclusion and that is Linux sucks. > > You Linux freaks can squawk all you want about how Linux us superior but you are wasting your time because the public has spoken and they realize Linux sucks. > > The truth is Linux sucks. > It really does and when pressed for direct application vs application comparisons you Linux oddballs run away and hide. > Fact. Moi ran FlatAss out of town, long ago. Go back to your dirt nap, Honey.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-09 16:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nvhfir0t.bji@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #288659 |
John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, April 8, 2015 at 10:51:16 PM UTC-4, Charlie Croyden wrote: >> Why not just admit it and either improve it or move on? >> The fact that it still sits at 1 percent of the market even though it's free should say it all. Why not take the not so subtle hint? >> >> Seriously it's time to move on. >> When Microsoft can release such shit as Windows ME, and Windows 8 and still Linux can't compete it's time to reconsider the Linux desktop as a viable entity. >> >> I've tried Linux and so have millions of other people who are looking for a free alternative to Microsoft or Apple. The problem is, the vast majority of us, something like 99 percent, have reached the same conclusion and that is Linux sucks. >> >> You Linux freaks can squawk all you want about how Linux us superior but you are wasting your time because the public has spoken and they realize Linux sucks. >> >> The truth is Linux sucks. >> It really does and when pressed for direct application vs application comparisons you Linux oddballs run away and hide. >> Fact. > Moi ran FlatAss out of town, long ago. That did actually seem to happen. > Go back to your dirt nap, Honey. Maybe suicide after realizing she actually bought a Miata.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web