Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #288633 > unrolled thread

Desktop Linux Is Shit.

Started byCharlie Croyden <charlescroyden3@gmail.com>
First post2015-04-08 19:51 -0700
Last post2015-04-09 16:12 +0000
Articles 9 — 8 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy


Contents

  Desktop Linux Is Shit. Charlie Croyden <charlescroyden3@gmail.com> - 2015-04-08 19:51 -0700
    Re: Desktop Linux Is Shit. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-09 09:57 +0200
      Desktop Linux Is Whatever You Want to Make It Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-09 06:02 -0400
        Jayne Ahlstrom, the Anal Whore. JermsGerms <jeremywalmartprescottaz@gmail.com> - 2015-04-09 05:51 -0700
          Re: Jayne Ahlstrom, the Anal Whore. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-09 10:24 -0400
          Re: Jayne Ahlstrom, the Anal Whore. Donald Miller <donaldmiller955@mail.com> - 2015-04-09 11:36 -0400
      Re: Desktop Linux Is Shit. Donald Miller <donaldmiller955@mail.com> - 2015-04-09 11:37 -0400
    Re: Desktop Linux Is Shit. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-04-09 05:11 -0700
      Re: Desktop Linux Is Shit. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-09 16:12 +0000

#288633 — Desktop Linux Is Shit.

FromCharlie Croyden <charlescroyden3@gmail.com>
Date2015-04-08 19:51 -0700
SubjectDesktop Linux Is Shit.
Message-ID<a58b467f-c873-479b-8860-6fd338750a8b@googlegroups.com>
Why not just admit it and either improve it or move on?
The fact that it still sits at 1 percent of the market even though it's free should say it all. Why not take the not so subtle hint? 

Seriously it's time to move on.
When Microsoft can release such shit as Windows ME, and Windows 8 and still Linux can't compete it's time to reconsider the Linux desktop as a viable entity.

I've tried Linux and so have millions of other people who are looking for a free alternative to Microsoft or Apple. The problem is, the vast majority of us, something like 99 percent, have reached the same conclusion and that is Linux sucks.

You Linux freaks can squawk all you want about how Linux us superior but you are wasting your time because the public has spoken and they realize Linux sucks.

The truth is Linux sucks.
It really does and when pressed for direct application vs application comparisons you Linux oddballs run away and hide.
Fact.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#288637

FromPeter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de>
Date2015-04-09 09:57 +0200
Message-ID<mg5bbi$88o$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#288633
Charlie Croyden wrote:

> Why not just admit it and either improve it or move on?

Hi flatfish

Still that lying rat you have always been

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#288644 — Desktop Linux Is Whatever You Want to Make It

FromChris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>
Date2015-04-09 06:02 -0400
SubjectDesktop Linux Is Whatever You Want to Make It
Message-ID<mg5il7$ue$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#288637
Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Charlie Croyden wrote:
>
>> Why not just admit it and either improve it or move on?
>
> Hi flatfish
>
> Still that lying rat you have always been

Indeed.

-- 
<Knghtbrd> "The currency collectors are offline."  "I'm rerouting though
           the secondary couplings.  If we re-align the phase manifold we
           should be able to use the plasma inductor matrix to manually
           launch a new cheesy spinoff series."
* ShadwDrgn sighs
<Phase> you leave my manifolds alone
<Phase> !

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#288665 — Jayne Ahlstrom, the Anal Whore.

FromJermsGerms <jeremywalmartprescottaz@gmail.com>
Date2015-04-09 05:51 -0700
SubjectJayne Ahlstrom, the Anal Whore.
Message-ID<a04405a9-10e8-4a8a-b5f0-7e2485c40cc5@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#288644
On Thursday, April 9, 2015 at 6:02:09 AM UTC-4, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> Indeed.
> 

Still changing subject lines?
Well you have just verified that you care more about being the big man in COLA than you do about your wife.
That's sad.
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=jayne%20ahlstrom%20the%20anal%20whore

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#288678 — Re: Jayne Ahlstrom, the Anal Whore.

FromSlimer <slvrslmr@lv.c>
Date2015-04-09 10:24 -0400
SubjectRe: Jayne Ahlstrom, the Anal Whore.
Message-ID<mg620j$pp4$4@dont-email.me>
In reply to#288665
On 2015-04-09 8:51 AM, JermsGerms wrote:
> On Thursday, April 9, 2015 at 6:02:09 AM UTC-4, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>> Indeed.
>>
>
> Still changing subject lines?
> Well you have just verified that you care more about being the big man in COLA than you do about your wife.
> That's sad.
> https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=jayne%20ahlstrom%20the%20anal%20whore

Thank you for saving us from the Chris AssStorm subject-line-changing 
menace.

-- 
Slimer
OpenMedia, GreenPeace Supporter & SPCA Paw Partner
Encrypt.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#288685 — Re: Jayne Ahlstrom, the Anal Whore.

FromDonald Miller <donaldmiller955@mail.com>
Date2015-04-09 11:36 -0400
SubjectRe: Jayne Ahlstrom, the Anal Whore.
Message-ID<vn6diat7ug40cbdard8ecsit4kaukd4siu@4ax.com>
In reply to#288665
On Thu, 9 Apr 2015 05:51:33 -0700 (PDT), JermsGerms
<jeremywalmartprescottaz@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Thursday, April 9, 2015 at 6:02:09 AM UTC-4, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>> Indeed.
>> 
>
>Still changing subject lines?
>Well you have just verified that you care more about being the big man in COLA than you do about your wife.
>That's sad.
>https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=jayne%20ahlstrom%20the%20anal%20whore

Why not just ignore him?
Obviously he has some mental issues so why aggravate him?
It's not nice to attack his family either. They aren't involved in
this group and besides, they are suffering enough just having to deal
with a full blown idiot like him.
If you want to make a point about him changing the subject line use
his name in the subject and change it back.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#288686

FromDonald Miller <donaldmiller955@mail.com>
Date2015-04-09 11:37 -0400
Message-ID<q47dial9io389vd5k8c82jl93upjhjtms9@4ax.com>
In reply to#288637
On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 09:57:30 +0200, Peter Köhlmann
<peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:

>Charlie Croyden wrote:
>
>> Why not just admit it and either improve it or move on?
>
>Hi flatfish
>
>Still that lying rat you have always been

That's a blast from the past.
Is he still around?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#288659

FromJohn Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com>
Date2015-04-09 05:11 -0700
Message-ID<434e3933-dab9-4546-a39f-75fb2e3e2846@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#288633
On Wednesday, April 8, 2015 at 10:51:16 PM UTC-4, Charlie Croyden wrote:
> Why not just admit it and either improve it or move on?
> The fact that it still sits at 1 percent of the market even though it's free should say it all. Why not take the not so subtle hint? 
> 
> Seriously it's time to move on.
> When Microsoft can release such shit as Windows ME, and Windows 8 and still Linux can't compete it's time to reconsider the Linux desktop as a viable entity.
> 
> I've tried Linux and so have millions of other people who are looking for a free alternative to Microsoft or Apple. The problem is, the vast majority of us, something like 99 percent, have reached the same conclusion and that is Linux sucks.
> 
> You Linux freaks can squawk all you want about how Linux us superior but you are wasting your time because the public has spoken and they realize Linux sucks.
> 
> The truth is Linux sucks.
> It really does and when pressed for direct application vs application comparisons you Linux oddballs run away and hide.
> Fact.


Moi ran FlatAss out of town, long ago.  Go back to your dirt nap, Honey.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#288699

Fromowl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date2015-04-09 16:12 +0000
Message-ID<nvhfir0t.bji@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to#288659
John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 8, 2015 at 10:51:16 PM UTC-4, Charlie Croyden wrote:
>> Why not just admit it and either improve it or move on?
>> The fact that it still sits at 1 percent of the market even though it's free should say it all. Why not take the not so subtle hint? 
>> 
>> Seriously it's time to move on.
>> When Microsoft can release such shit as Windows ME, and Windows 8 and still Linux can't compete it's time to reconsider the Linux desktop as a viable entity.
>> 
>> I've tried Linux and so have millions of other people who are looking for a free alternative to Microsoft or Apple. The problem is, the vast majority of us, something like 99 percent, have reached the same conclusion and that is Linux sucks.
>> 
>> You Linux freaks can squawk all you want about how Linux us superior but you are wasting your time because the public has spoken and they realize Linux sucks.
>> 
>> The truth is Linux sucks.
>> It really does and when pressed for direct application vs application comparisons you Linux oddballs run away and hide.
>> Fact.


> Moi ran FlatAss out of town, long ago.

That did actually seem to happen.

> Go back to your dirt nap, Honey.

Maybe suicide after realizing she actually bought a Miata.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy


csiph-web