Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #722223 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2026-09-15 21:48 -0400 |
| Last post | 2026-09-18 18:25 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 707 — 37 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Killer price on a mini PC "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-09-15 21:48 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-09-16 03:17 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-09-15 23:35 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-18 21:29 -0700
Re: Killer price on a mini PC c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-19 01:51 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-09-19 09:36 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-19 12:03 -0700
Re: Killer price on a mini PC c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-20 01:49 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-21 02:44 -0700
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-09-21 20:29 +1000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-21 22:45 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-22 02:30 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-09-22 20:38 +1000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-22 12:43 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-09-22 21:47 +1000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-22 12:54 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-22 17:59 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-09-21 11:38 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-21 18:13 -0700
Re: Killer price on a mini PC rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-22 03:22 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-22 01:54 -0700
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-22 06:56 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-22 07:19 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-22 01:54 -0700
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-09-16 07:24 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-09-16 12:36 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-09-16 10:11 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-09-17 12:20 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-09-17 12:58 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-09-17 13:26 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-18 00:49 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-09-18 08:10 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-18 20:01 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-09-18 16:23 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-09-18 17:42 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-09-18 18:09 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-18 23:02 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-09-18 19:27 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-19 01:08 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-19 00:33 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-18 21:20 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Hank Rogers <Hank@nospam.invalid> - 2026-09-18 16:05 -0500
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-09-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-09-18 17:19 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-09-18 17:47 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-18 23:13 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-09-19 19:56 +1000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-09-19 09:42 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-09-20 21:24 +1000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-20 19:18 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-09-21 04:51 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-09-21 19:18 +1000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Chris Abraham <chris@gerriscorp.com> - 2026-09-21 13:13 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-21 23:33 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Chris Abraham <chris@gerriscorp.com> - 2026-09-21 18:46 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-22 03:12 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-09-22 20:52 +1000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-22 20:02 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-09-23 21:21 +1000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Mark Lloyd <not.email@all.invalid> - 2026-09-19 18:33 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-19 21:24 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-09-20 04:03 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-20 04:21 -0400
screen shape/orientation (was: Re: Killer price on a mini PC) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-20 10:31 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-20 10:45 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-20 10:57 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-20 10:39 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-20 15:04 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-20 19:29 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-20 22:47 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-09-20 20:36 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-21 12:14 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2026-09-20 11:26 -0500
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-20 19:32 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-09-21 06:16 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-21 12:41 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-21 14:30 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-09-22 20:57 +1000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-09-21 12:01 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-21 17:19 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2026-09-21 16:02 -0500
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-09-21 19:23 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-22 03:30 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2026-09-22 06:14 -0500
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-22 18:12 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-22 14:12 +0200
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-22 13:47 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-22 19:29 +0200
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Mark Lloyd <not.email@all.invalid> - 2026-09-21 14:26 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-21 16:36 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-09-21 18:44 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-21 22:29 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-21 23:34 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-09-22 08:28 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-22 13:49 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-22 19:40 +0200
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-23 07:43 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-23 12:38 +0200
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-23 12:11 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-23 19:55 +0200
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-09-23 19:20 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-24 00:27 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2026-09-24 23:31 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-09-25 09:18 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-25 11:05 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-25 21:18 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 04:13 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-26 18:55 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-09-25 20:43 +1000
Gigaset M740AV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-23 20:25 +0200
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-24 13:43 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-24 20:39 +0200
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-25 06:51 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-25 09:24 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-25 12:11 +0200
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-25 11:18 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-25 12:41 +0200
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-09-25 11:57 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-25 12:48 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-25 14:25 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-25 15:46 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-25 16:47 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-25 21:28 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-26 04:33 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-25 14:03 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-25 15:42 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-25 21:34 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-26 04:36 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-26 20:14 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-26 20:39 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Hank Rogers <Hank@nospam.invalid> - 2026-09-26 17:14 -0500
Re: Killer price on a mini PC c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 22:16 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 08:24 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 09:37 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 12:42 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 13:32 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-09-27 18:56 +1000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 12:46 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-27 14:03 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-27 19:16 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-28 07:19 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-27 16:37 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 17:38 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-28 22:32 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-29 00:10 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Joe Makowiec <makowiec@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-28 21:46 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-28 23:27 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-29 08:12 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-27 19:05 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-09-28 20:46 +1000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-28 12:03 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-28 17:37 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Chris Abraham <chris@gerriscorp.com> - 2026-09-26 19:14 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-26 12:10 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-09-22 02:20 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-22 07:50 +0100
OT - TV (was: Re: Killer price on a mini PC) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-22 18:59 +0100
Re: OT - TV (was: Re: Killer price on a mini PC) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-22 19:52 +0000
Re: OT - TV Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-09-23 02:29 -0400
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-23 09:50 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-23 12:40 +0200
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-23 13:38 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-09-24 19:46 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-23 00:04 -0400
OT - TV (was: Re: Killer price on a mini PC) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-23 06:45 +0100
Re: OT - TV c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-24 04:10 -0400
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-24 12:39 +0100
Re: OT - TV Abandoned Trolley <that.bloke@microsoft.com> - 2026-09-24 13:17 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-24 14:23 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-24 19:44 +0100
Re: OT - TV Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-24 23:17 +0000
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-25 20:39 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-26 12:11 +0200
Re: OT - TV Abandoned Trolley <that.bloke@microsoft.com> - 2026-09-26 11:47 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-26 19:08 +0100
Re: OT - TV Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> - 2026-09-26 19:58 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-26 20:30 +0100
Re: OT - TV Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-09-26 19:10 +0000
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-26 21:02 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-26 21:03 +0100
Re: OT - TV Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-09-27 18:20 +0000
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-28 16:26 +0100
Re: OT - TV Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-09-28 15:45 +0000
Re: OT - TV Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-28 16:30 +0000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-28 17:46 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-28 22:25 +0100
Re: OT - TV NY <me@privacy.net> - 2026-09-29 16:40 +0100
OT - Lehrer (was: Re: OT - TV) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-29 16:58 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer (was: Re: OT - TV) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-29 18:19 +0000
Re: OT - Lehrer "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-29 20:57 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer Charles Hope <clh@candehope.me.uk> - 2026-09-29 20:00 +0000
Re: OT - Lehrer (was: Re: OT - TV) André Coutanche <acoutanche@gmx.co.uk> - 2026-09-29 21:50 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer NY <me@privacy.net> - 2026-09-29 22:33 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-29 22:48 +0000
Re: OT - Lehrer "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-30 01:07 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-09-30 15:51 -0700
Re: OT - Lehrer c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-30 21:02 -0400
Re: OT - Lehrer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2026-10-01 06:22 -0500
Re: OT - Lehrer The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 13:01 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer NY <me@privacy.net> - 2026-10-01 10:57 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer NY <me@privacy.net> - 2026-09-30 08:10 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-30 01:39 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2026-09-30 00:46 +0000
Re: OT - Lehrer NY <me@privacy.net> - 2026-09-29 22:39 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-09-30 12:25 +0000
Re: OT - Lehrer "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-30 13:34 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-30 14:31 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer NY <me@privacy.net> - 2026-09-30 14:47 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-09-30 14:58 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-01 02:36 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer NY <me@privacy.net> - 2026-10-01 11:12 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-10-01 14:35 +0000
Re: OT - Lehrer NY <me@privacy.net> - 2026-10-01 16:14 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-10-01 17:35 +0000
Re: OT - Lehrer Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-01 17:53 +0000
Re: OT - Lehrer John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-10-01 19:03 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-01 21:50 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:25 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 11:13 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer NY <me@privacy.net> - 2026-10-01 11:51 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-09-30 14:55 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer Charles Hope <clh@candehope.me.uk> - 2026-09-30 14:15 +0000
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-09-27 19:58 +1000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 12:52 +0100
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-09-27 22:13 +1000
Re: OT - TV Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-09-27 11:56 -0400
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-27 19:28 +0200
Re: OT - TV Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-09-27 15:28 -0400
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-28 10:19 +0200
[OT] - audio distribution, Rediffusion-style (was: Re: OT - TV) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-28 16:43 +0100
Re: OT - TV Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2026-09-27 11:44 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-27 16:12 +0100
Re: OT - TV Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2026-09-27 18:12 +0100
Re: OT - TV Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-09-27 18:23 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 18:34 +0100
Re: OT - TV Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2026-09-28 14:03 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-28 16:46 +0100
Re: OT - TV Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2026-09-29 12:01 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-29 13:05 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-29 14:13 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Other John <nomail@here.org> - 2026-09-29 16:53 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-29 17:12 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-30 11:23 +0200
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-30 11:48 +0100
Re: OT - TV Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-09-30 07:37 -0400
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-30 14:28 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-01 00:35 +0200
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-01 02:15 +0100
Re: OT - TV Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-10-01 00:15 -0400
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 12:50 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-01 14:24 +0200
Re: OT - TV Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2026-10-01 17:17 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 12:48 +0100
Re: OT - TV John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-10-01 13:32 +0100
Re: OT - TV Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-10-01 14:52 +0000
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-03 21:10 +1000
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-03 13:39 +0200
Re: OT - TV Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-10-03 09:11 -0400
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-04 21:26 +1100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 13:19 +0200
Re: OT - TV Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-10-04 10:36 -0400
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 19:18 +0200
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 12:47 +0100
Re: OT - TV John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-10-03 12:50 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 13:09 +0100
Re: OT - TV John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-10-03 15:59 +0100
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-10-03 15:56 +0000
Re: OT - TV John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-10-03 17:19 +0100
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-10-04 10:54 +0000
Re: OT - TV c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-05 01:27 -0400
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-10-05 07:55 +0000
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-05 14:54 +0200
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-10-05 15:17 +0000
Re: OT - TV John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-10-05 11:29 +0100
Re: OT - TV Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-10-05 11:46 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-05 12:47 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-06 00:23 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 18:41 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-03 22:52 +0100
Re: OT - TV Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-10-03 21:24 -0400
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-10-04 08:08 +0000
Re: OT - TV John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-10-04 09:29 +0100
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-29 15:54 +0000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-29 17:15 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-30 11:27 +0200
Re: OT - TV John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-09-30 11:13 +0100
Re: OT - TV John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-09-30 11:19 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-30 11:57 +0100
Re: OT - TV John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-09-30 13:54 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-30 14:34 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-01 02:22 +0100
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-10-01 06:37 +0000
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-01 00:37 +0200
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-30 11:50 +0100
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-30 13:08 +0000
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-01 00:50 +0200
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-10-01 06:12 +0000
Re: OT - TV c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-01 03:29 -0400
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-01 14:53 +0200
Re: OT - TV Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-10-01 03:32 -0400
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-01 14:49 +0200
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 12:57 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-01 15:19 +0200
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-10-01 14:34 +0000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 15:51 +0100
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-10-02 06:52 +0000
Re: OT - TV Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-10-04 07:52 +0100
Re: OT - TV c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-04 03:15 -0400
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-04 15:51 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 18:16 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-27 13:12 +0200
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-25 10:06 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-25 20:50 +0100
Re: OT - TV Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-26 01:31 +0000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-26 04:21 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-26 19:26 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-26 20:26 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-26 20:37 +0100
Re: OT - TV Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-26 20:36 +0000
Re: OT - TV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-27 00:03 +0000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 08:15 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-27 10:16 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 12:48 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-27 16:16 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 08:07 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-27 10:20 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-27 13:18 +0200
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 13:06 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-27 14:25 +0200
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 17:32 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-27 16:22 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 17:34 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 12:50 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-27 14:25 +0200
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-27 16:25 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 17:32 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 17:30 +0100
Re: OT - TV Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-09-27 15:04 +0000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 17:39 +0100
Re: OT - TV Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-09-27 19:58 +0000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-28 09:13 +0100
Re: OT - TV Abandoned Trolley <that.bloke@microsoft.com> - 2026-09-28 09:39 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-28 11:26 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-28 13:04 +0200
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-28 16:42 +0100
Re: OT - TV Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-09-28 16:45 +0000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-28 17:53 +0100
Re: OT - TV Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-09-28 19:26 +0000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-29 10:25 +0100
Re: OT - TV Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-09-29 09:43 +0000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-29 10:56 +0100
Re: OT - TV Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-09-29 10:41 +0000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-29 13:02 +0100
Re: OT - TV Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-09-29 13:39 +0000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-29 15:04 +0100
Re: OT - TV Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-09-29 14:19 +0000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-29 15:47 +0100
Re: OT - TV Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-09-29 20:01 +0000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-30 01:06 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-30 01:25 +0100
Re: OT - TV Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-09-30 01:15 +0000
Re: OT - TV Carlos <crazyhotwrse8@stinty.org> - 2026-10-03 20:41 -0400
Re: OT - TV "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-10-03 21:28 -0400
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-29 17:16 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-29 18:50 +0100
[OT] - power (was: Re: OT - TV) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-29 19:05 +0100
Re: [OT] - power The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-29 19:15 +0100
Re: [OT] - power "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-30 11:48 +0200
Re: [OT] - power The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-30 12:00 +0100
Re: [OT] - power c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-30 15:30 -0400
Re: [OT] - power The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 12:47 +0100
Re: [OT] - power Chris Abraham <chris@gerriscorp.com> - 2026-09-30 13:28 -0400
Re: [OT] - power The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 12:24 +0100
Re: OT - TV Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-09-29 14:58 -0400
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-30 01:04 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-30 11:52 +0200
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-30 12:01 +0100
Re: OT - TV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-30 17:36 +0000
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-01 00:55 +0200
Re: OT - TV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-01 03:57 +0000
Re: OT - TV Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-10-04 10:40 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 11:29 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-04 15:59 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 18:25 +0100
[OT] energy (was: Re: OT - TV) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-04 23:54 +0100
Re: [OT] energy (was: Re: OT - TV) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-05 00:57 +0000
Re: [OT] energy The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-05 08:51 +0100
Re: [OT] energy c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-05 04:40 -0400
Re: [OT] energy "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-05 15:19 +0200
Re: [OT] energy The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-05 16:20 +0100
Re: [OT] energy "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-05 19:32 +0200
Re: [OT] energy The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-05 20:02 +0100
Re: [OT] energy rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-05 19:03 +0000
Re: [OT] energy (was: Re: OT - TV) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2026-10-05 06:40 -0500
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-09-27 20:18 +1000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 12:54 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-26 03:52 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-26 19:41 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-26 20:36 +0100
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-09-25 20:58 +1000
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-25 20:56 +0100
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-09-24 22:24 +1000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-24 14:07 +0100
Re: OT - TV Abandoned Trolley <that.bloke@microsoft.com> - 2026-09-24 12:53 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-24 14:09 +0100
Re: OT - TV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 18:56 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-23 10:01 +0100
OT - TV (was: Re: Killer price on a mini PC) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-23 14:42 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-23 15:04 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-23 15:55 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-24 12:18 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-24 19:50 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-25 10:34 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-25 21:10 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-26 04:29 +0100
Re: OT - TV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-26 05:12 +0000
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-09-25 21:30 +1000
Re: OT - TV Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-09-25 19:54 +0000
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-25 21:14 +0100
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-26 12:38 +0000
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-26 20:06 +0100
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-27 09:16 +0000
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-27 10:30 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-27 13:24 +0200
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-27 14:35 +0000
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-28 14:02 +0200
Re: OT - TV Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-09-27 19:09 +0000
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-28 14:03 +0200
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-28 14:46 +0000
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-29 09:22 +0200
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-29 09:00 +0000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-29 10:49 +0100
Re: OT - TV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-29 18:46 +0000
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-30 11:55 +0200
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-30 12:50 +0000
Re: OT - TV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-30 17:35 +0000
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-10-01 06:19 +0000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 12:27 +0100
Re: OT - TV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-01 20:22 +0000
Re: OT - TV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-01 20:20 +0000
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-10-02 06:57 +0000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 13:22 +0100
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:43 +0000
Re: OT - TV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 19:21 +0000
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-02 20:19 +0200
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-02 20:25 +0200
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 20:12 +0100
Re: OT - TV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-03 00:48 +0000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 20:09 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-02 21:49 +0200
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 21:02 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-02 22:18 +0200
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 21:33 +0100
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-10-02 07:07 +0000
Re: OT - TV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 18:33 +0000
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-01 00:59 +0200
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-10-01 06:12 +0000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 13:02 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-01 15:28 +0200
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-10-01 14:28 +0000
Re: OT - TV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-01 21:03 +0000
Re: OT - TV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-30 17:27 +0000
Re: OT - TV (was: Re: Killer price on a mini PC) Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-23 15:04 +0000
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-23 16:28 +0100
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-23 15:51 +0000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-24 12:20 +0100
Re: OT - TV Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-24 18:26 +0000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-25 09:20 +0100
Re: OT - TV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 18:44 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Mark Lloyd <not.email@all.invalid> - 2026-09-22 16:05 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-22 18:31 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-23 09:45 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Mark Lloyd <not.email@all.invalid> - 2026-09-23 14:41 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-24 12:09 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 03:14 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-26 12:10 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 21:55 -0400
OT - TV (now radio) (was: Re: Killer price on a mini PC) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-27 09:49 +0100
Re: OT - TV (now radio) "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-27 13:32 +0200
Re: OT - TV (now radio) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-27 16:30 +0100
Re: OT - TV (now radio) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 17:36 +0100
Re: OT - TV (now radio) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-28 16:55 +0100
Re: OT - TV (now radio) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-28 17:10 +0100
Re: OT - TV (now radio) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-28 22:09 +0100
Re: OT - TV (now radio) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-29 10:45 +0100
Re: OT - TV (now radio) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-29 18:16 +0000
Re: OT - TV (now radio) "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-30 11:58 +0200
Re: OT - TV (now radio) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-30 12:05 +0100
Re: OT - TV (now radio) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-30 17:07 +0000
Re: OT - TV (now radio) c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-30 15:28 -0400
Re: OT - TV (now radio) "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-01 01:07 +0200
Re: OT - TV (now radio) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-01 02:41 +0100
Re: OT - TV (now radio) c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-30 22:27 -0400
Re: OT - TV (now radio) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-01 03:10 +0000
Re: OT - TV (now radio) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 12:39 +0100
Re: OT - TV (now radio) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-01 19:36 +0100
Re: OT - TV (now radio) Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-10-01 18:27 -0400
Re: OT - TV (now radio) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:27 +0100
Re: OT - TV (now radio) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-02 13:38 +0100
Re: OT - TV (now radio) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 15:15 +0100
Re: OT - TV (now radio) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 17:52 +0000
Re: OT - TV (now radio) c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 23:49 -0400
[OT] = X-rays and medical costs (was: Re: OT - TV (now radio)) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-01 20:16 +0100
Re: [OT] = X-rays and medical costs (was: Re: OT - TV (now radio)) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-01 22:35 +0000
Re: [OT] = X-rays and medical costs c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-01 23:22 -0400
Re: [OT] = X-rays and medical costs "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-02 06:58 +0100
Re: [OT] = X-rays and medical costs c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 02:21 -0400
Re: [OT] = X-rays and medical costs The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:33 +0100
Re: [OT] = X-rays and medical costs Abandoned Trolley <that.bloke@microsoft.com> - 2026-10-02 13:47 +0100
Re: [OT] = X-rays and medical costs The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 15:17 +0100
Re: [OT] = X-rays and medical costs Abandoned Trolley <that.bloke@microsoft.com> - 2026-10-02 16:07 +0100
Re: [OT] = X-rays and medical costs c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-03 01:54 -0400
Re: [OT] = X-rays and medical costs The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 10:06 +0100
Re: [OT] = X-rays and medical costs c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-03 01:53 -0400
Re: [OT] = X-rays and medical costs c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 23:55 -0400
Re: [OT] = X-rays and medical costs c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 23:33 -0400
Re: [OT] = X-rays and medical costs "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-02 13:51 +0100
Re: [OT] = X-rays and medical costs c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-03 00:14 -0400
Re: [OT] = X-rays and medical costs rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 17:34 +0000
Re: [OT] = X-rays and medical costs "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-02 11:35 +0200
Re: [OT] = X-rays and medical costs c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 20:57 -0400
Re: [OT] = X-rays and medical costs "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 12:31 +0200
Re: [OT] = X-rays and medical costs "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-04 15:26 +0100
Re: [OT] = X-rays and medical costs "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 19:24 +0200
Re: [OT] = X-rays and medical costs "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-04 23:39 +0100
Re: [OT] = X-rays and medical costs "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-05 02:14 +0200
Re: [OT] = X-rays and medical costs c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-05 02:40 -0400
Re: [OT] = X-rays and medical costs c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-05 01:02 -0400
Re: [OT] = X-rays and medical costs Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-06 03:52 +0000
Re: [OT] = X-rays and medical costs The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:28 +0100
Re: OT - TV (now radio) "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-01 21:55 +0200
Re: OT - TV (now radio) c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-01 23:28 -0400
Re: OT - TV (now radio) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-01 03:04 +0000
Re: OT - TV (now radio) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 12:39 +0100
Re: OT - TV (now radio) "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-01 22:03 +0200
Re: OT - TV (now radio) c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-01 23:33 -0400
Re: OT - TV (now radio) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-02 07:08 +0100
Re: OT - TV (now radio) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:55 +0100
Re: OT - TV (now radio) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 18:31 +0000
Re: OT - TV (now radio) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 18:08 +0000
Re: OT - TV (now radio) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:41 +0100
Re: OT - TV (now radio) c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 23:46 -0400
Re: OT - TV (now radio) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 09:52 +0100
Re: OT - TV (now radio) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:40 +0100
Re: OT - TV (now radio) c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 23:44 -0400
Re: OT - TV (now radio) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-03 05:00 +0000
Re: OT - TV (now radio) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 09:48 +0100
Re: OT - TV (now radio) "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 12:35 +0200
Re: OT - TV (now radio) c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-05 01:12 -0400
Re: OT - TV (now radio) "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-05 14:19 +0200
Re: OT - TV (now radio) "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-01 15:34 +0200
Re: OT - TV (now radio) c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-30 21:46 -0400
Re: OT - TV (now radio) Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-10-04 16:07 +0100
Re: OT - TV (now radio) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 18:27 +0100
Re: OT - TV (now radio) c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-05 02:42 -0400
Re: OT - TV (now radio) Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-10-01 06:50 +0000
Re: OT - TV (now radio) c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-01 03:32 -0400
Re: OT - TV (now radio) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 12:37 +0100
Re: OT - TV (now radio) "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-01 22:10 +0200
Re: OT - TV (now radio) c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-01 23:45 -0400
Re: OT - TV (now radio) "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-02 11:41 +0200
Re: OT - TV (now radio) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 13:08 +0100
Re: OT - TV (now radio) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 13:06 +0100
Re: OT - TV (now radio) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 12:33 +0100
Re: OT - TV (now radio) (was: Re: Killer price on a mini PC) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-27 16:23 +0000
Re: OT - TV (now radio) "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-27 19:34 +0200
Re: OT - TV (now radio) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-28 16:59 +0100
Re: OT - TV (now radio) Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-09-28 13:37 -0400
Re: OT - TV (now radio) "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-29 09:27 +0200
Re: OT - TV (now radio) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-29 14:29 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-27 08:55 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-28 01:28 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-28 07:12 +0000
OT - electronic tinkering (was: Re: Killer price on a mini PC) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-28 17:19 +0100
Re: OT - electronic tinkering (was: Re: Killer price on a mini PC) Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-29 09:26 +0000
Re: OT - electronic tinkering (was: Re: Killer price on a mini PC) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-29 18:57 +0000
Re: OT - electronic tinkering (was: Re: Killer price on a mini PC) Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-30 05:51 +0000
Re: OT - electronic tinkering (was: Re: Killer price on a mini PC) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-30 17:47 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-28 09:18 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-23 17:28 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-24 12:21 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-24 18:26 +0000
OT - TV (was: Re: Killer price on a mini PC) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-24 20:08 +0100
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-09-25 21:45 +1000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 20:05 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-25 09:22 +0100
OT - TV (was: Re: Killer price on a mini PC) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-25 21:43 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-26 04:43 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-24 14:25 +0000
OT - TV (was: Re: Killer price on a mini PC) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-24 19:57 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-24 21:13 +0200
Re: OT - TV Hank Rogers <Hank@nospam.invalid> - 2026-09-24 17:47 -0500
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-25 10:53 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-25 10:51 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-22 08:22 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-22 19:01 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-23 07:19 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-09-23 13:32 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-23 14:50 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-23 18:40 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-09-22 21:10 +1000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-22 12:49 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-22 14:20 +0200
OT - TV (was: Re: Killer price on a mini PC) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-22 19:13 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-09-22 13:59 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-22 02:20 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-09-22 21:16 +1000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-22 12:52 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-22 15:35 +0000
OT - TV (was: Re: Killer price on a mini PC) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-22 19:51 +0100
Re: OT - TV (was: Re: Killer price on a mini PC) Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-23 08:16 +0000
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-23 15:07 +0100
Re: OT - TV Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-09-23 14:28 +0000
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-23 15:30 +0000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-24 12:07 +0100
Re: OT - TV Mark Lloyd <nomail@here.invalid> - 2026-09-25 21:52 +0000
Re: OT - TV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-25 22:15 +0000
Re: OT - TV c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 02:17 -0400
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-26 10:11 +0100
Re: OT - TV (was: Re: Killer price on a mini PC) Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-10-03 08:20 +0000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 10:10 +0100
Re: OT - TV c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-03 23:18 -0400
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-10-04 07:41 +0000
Re: OT - TV c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-04 23:44 -0400
Re: OT - TV Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-10-05 00:45 -0400
Re: OT - TV c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-05 03:06 -0400
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-10-05 07:34 +0000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-05 09:10 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-05 14:28 +0200
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-05 16:00 +0100
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-10-05 15:03 +0000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-05 16:33 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-05 23:44 +0100
Re: OT - TV Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-06 03:52 +0000
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 12:39 +0200
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-23 09:53 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-23 09:44 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-23 12:11 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-23 13:47 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-23 14:46 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-24 12:13 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-24 14:22 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 03:23 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-26 10:17 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 21:36 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 08:27 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-27 03:59 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-27 10:08 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-27 19:39 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 12:40 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-09-27 22:28 +1000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-27 19:43 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-27 19:26 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-27 09:55 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 12:43 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-28 01:31 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-23 19:05 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-22 15:50 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-09-23 22:26 +1000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-23 13:56 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-09-23 23:35 +1000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-09-20 21:29 +1000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Mark Lloyd <not.email@all.invalid> - 2026-09-20 16:56 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-09-20 18:20 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-09-20 18:22 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-09-20 20:14 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-09-21 06:34 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-20 19:57 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-20 23:56 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-21 22:34 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-21 23:35 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Mark Lloyd <not.email@all.invalid> - 2026-09-21 14:20 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-21 16:32 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-09-18 17:45 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-18 22:52 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-19 00:37 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-09-19 20:02 +1000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-09-19 07:45 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-19 19:50 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-18 22:43 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam2616@zugschl.us> - 2026-09-19 08:52 +0200
Re: Killer price on a mini PC rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-18 22:41 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-09-19 17:48 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-19 18:56 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-09-19 14:45 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-20 10:37 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-19 21:42 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-20 01:35 +0000
Reminiscing re laptops (was: Re: Killer price on a mini PC) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-20 10:45 +0100
Re: Reminiscing re laptops (was: Re: Killer price on a mini PC) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-20 17:52 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-20 09:46 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-17 13:59 -0700
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-09-17 17:06 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-17 18:30 -0700
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-09-17 21:37 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-18 00:39 -0700
Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-18 09:06 +0100
Re: Killer price on a mini PC "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-09-18 04:19 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-18 14:28 -0700
Re: Killer price on a mini PC rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-18 22:59 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-18 17:06 -0700
Re: Killer price on a mini PC pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2026-09-19 00:23 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-19 11:00 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-19 11:09 +0000
Re: Killer price on a mini PC T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-18 18:04 -0700
Re: Killer price on a mini PC Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-09-19 08:21 -0400
Re: Killer price on a mini PC T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-18 18:25 -0700
Page 28 of 36 — ← Prev page 1 … 26 27 [28] 29 30 … 36 Next page →
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-02 12:41 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: OT - TV (now radio) |
| Message-ID | <119o59i$21k2o$12@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #723119 |
On 02/10/2026 04:33, c186282 wrote: > Anyway, if your dentist is still giving you > a 100X dose using FILM So what? You probably get more radiation from eating a banana https://xkcd.com/radiation/ -- Climate is what you expect but weather is what you get. Mark Twain
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-02 23:46 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: OT - TV (now radio) |
| Message-ID | <cR-dna1thaUB5133nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #723135 |
On 10/2/26 07:41, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 02/10/2026 04:33, c186282 wrote: >> Anyway, if your dentist is still giving you >> a 100X dose using FILM > > So what? You probably get more radiation from eating a banana > > https://xkcd.com/radiation/ Ummm ... not SURE about that at all. IMHO, the less ionizing radiation the better.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-03 09:52 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: OT - TV (now radio) |
| Message-ID | <119qfoj$2qdqt$15@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #723169 |
On 03/10/2026 04:46, c186282 wrote: > On 10/2/26 07:41, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 02/10/2026 04:33, c186282 wrote: >>> Anyway, if your dentist is still giving you >>> a 100X dose using FILM >> >> So what? You probably get more radiation from eating a banana >> >> https://xkcd.com/radiation/ > > Ummm ... not SURE about that at all. > > IMHO, the less ionizing radiation the better. > There is SOME evidence that a little is actually good for you. Google 'radiation hormesis' There is solid evidence that up to a level possibly 100 times 'regulatory limits' there is no detectable effect from chronic low dose radiation. As the saying goes, more people died at Chappaquiddick than at Three Mile Island... -- All political activity makes complete sense once the proposition that all government is basically a self-legalising protection racket, is fully understood.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-02 12:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: OT - TV (now radio) |
| Message-ID | <119o56h$21k2o$11@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #723106 |
On 01/10/2026 21:03, Carlos E. R. wrote: > On 2026-10-01 13:39, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 01/10/2026 02:41, J. P. Gilliver wrote: >>> I'm pretty sure my dentist still uses film and X-rays, though they seem >>> to develop (and scan) them_amazingly_ quickly - but they still go out >>> of the room (same principle as the shoe salesmen, I think) to fire the >>> machine. >> >> The changeover to all digital stared about 20 years ago and is not >> yet complete. Because the kit is very expensive and photos work pretty >> well > > The private clinic I go to some times (covered by my insurance) changed > the to digital plates maybe a year ago. I was very surprised when I > noticed them reusing the plate without changing the film, and asked. > > I did not know there were sensor plates suitable for X-rays. > I am not totally sure, but I think that you can use a standard light sensor in conjunction with a a fluorescent screen. There may well be semiconductor arrays that resonnd directly to X rays as well Umm.... goggle google google... "Flat Panel Detectors (FPDs) Direct Conversion FPDs: Use a semiconductor material (like amorphous selenium) to convert X-ray photons directly into electrical charges. They offer high spatial resolution and sharp image clarity. Indirect Conversion FPDs: Use a scintillator layer (like caesium iodide) to turn X-rays into visible light first. A photodetector array (like amorphous silicon) then converts that light into an electrical signal. Solid-State Dental Sensors (CCD and CMOS) Charge-Coupled Device (CCD) Sensors: Couple a scintillator to a silicon chip to transport and read out charges. They provide high sensitivity and low noise, but tend to cost more and use more power. Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor (CMOS) Sensors: Feature individual amplifiers at every pixel, allowing faster readout, lower power usage, and smaller designs. They are standard in modern digital intraoral imaging" Well there you go. -- Microsoft : the best reason to go to Linux that ever existed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-02 23:44 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: OT - TV (now radio) |
| Message-ID | <cR-dnbJthaWh5133nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #723134 |
On 10/2/26 07:40, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 01/10/2026 21:03, Carlos E. R. wrote: >> On 2026-10-01 13:39, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> On 01/10/2026 02:41, J. P. Gilliver wrote: >>>> I'm pretty sure my dentist still uses film and X-rays, though they seem >>>> to develop (and scan) them_amazingly_ quickly - but they still go out >>>> of the room (same principle as the shoe salesmen, I think) to fire the >>>> machine. >>> >>> The changeover to all digital stared about 20 years ago and is not >>> yet complete. Because the kit is very expensive and photos work >>> pretty well >> >> The private clinic I go to some times (covered by my insurance) >> changed the to digital plates maybe a year ago. I was very surprised >> when I noticed them reusing the plate without changing the film, and >> asked. >> >> I did not know there were sensor plates suitable for X-rays. >> > I am not totally sure, but I think that you can use a standard light > sensor in conjunction with a a fluorescent screen. > > There may well be semiconductor arrays that resonnd directly to X rays > as well > > Umm.... goggle google google... > > "Flat Panel Detectors (FPDs) > > Direct Conversion FPDs: Use a semiconductor material (like amorphous > selenium) to convert X-ray photons directly into electrical charges. > They offer high spatial resolution and sharp image clarity. > > Indirect Conversion FPDs: Use a scintillator layer (like caesium iodide) > to turn X-rays into visible light first. A photodetector array (like > amorphous silicon) then converts that light into an electrical signal. > > Solid-State Dental Sensors (CCD and CMOS) > > Charge-Coupled Device (CCD) Sensors: Couple a scintillator to a silicon > chip to transport and read out charges. They provide high sensitivity > and low noise, but tend to cost more and use more power. > > > Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor (CMOS) Sensors: Feature > individual amplifiers at every pixel, allowing faster readout, lower > power usage, and smaller designs. They are standard in modern digital > intraoral imaging" > > > > Well there you go. Of note, such high-rez/high-sensitivity sensors have been around for over a decade. They keep getting better. Even the first were better than the usual film pix. I *think*, but am not sure, that 'direct' is the tech of choice now. The sharpness suggests that they aren't lighting-up phosphors. The thickness of the sensors seems to preclude using fiber-optic inserts to isolate off-axis glow. Anyway, if YOUR dentist is still using film and that big x-ray rig ......... Do they keep a jar of leeches too ... ? A foot- powered low speed drill ....... ? Somewhere I found a 'restored' version of one of those 19th century drills. All pretty. Tempted to buy it for my dentists to keep under glass in the lobby :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-03 05:00 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: OT - TV (now radio) |
| Message-ID | <UZ%vS.2223$ygUb.1947@fx23.iad> |
| In reply to | #723168 |
On 2026-10-03, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:
> Somewhere I found a 'restored' version of one of
> those 19th century drills. All pretty. Tempted to
> buy it for my dentists to keep under glass in
> the lobby :-)
It's an antique. They don't make them like this anymore.
Heavy... sturdy... dull.
-- Little Shop of Horrors (Steve Martin)
--
/~\ Charlie Gibbs | In this world there are
\ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | two kinds of people:
X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | 1. Those who can extrapolate
/ \ if you read it the right way. | from incomplete data.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-03 09:48 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: OT - TV (now radio) |
| Message-ID | <119qfgu$2qdqt$14@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #723168 |
On 03/10/2026 04:44, c186282 wrote: > Anyway, if YOUR dentist is still using film and > that big x-ray rig ......... I no longer bother paying a dentist to fuck my teeth up, such that are left. -- All political activity makes complete sense once the proposition that all government is basically a self-legalising protection racket, is fully understood.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-04 12:35 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: OT - TV (now radio) |
| Message-ID | <nieoftF1toqU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #723168 |
On 2026-10-03 05:44, c186282 wrote:
> On 10/2/26 07:40, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>> On 01/10/2026 21:03, Carlos E. R. wrote:
>>> On 2026-10-01 13:39, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>> On 01/10/2026 02:41, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
>>>>> I'm pretty sure my dentist still uses film and X-rays, though they
>>>>> seem
>>>>> to develop (and scan) them_amazingly_ quickly - but they still go out
>>>>> of the room (same principle as the shoe salesmen, I think) to fire the
>>>>> machine.
>>>>
>>>> The changeover to all digital stared about 20 years ago and is not
>>>> yet complete. Because the kit is very expensive and photos work
>>>> pretty well
>>>
>>> The private clinic I go to some times (covered by my insurance)
>>> changed the to digital plates maybe a year ago. I was very surprised
>>> when I noticed them reusing the plate without changing the film, and
>>> asked.
>>>
>>> I did not know there were sensor plates suitable for X-rays.
>>>
>> I am not totally sure, but I think that you can use a standard light
>> sensor in conjunction with a a fluorescent screen.
>>
>> There may well be semiconductor arrays that resonnd directly to X rays
>> as well
>>
>> Umm.... goggle google google...
>>
>> "Flat Panel Detectors (FPDs)
>>
>> Direct Conversion FPDs: Use a semiconductor material (like amorphous
>> selenium) to convert X-ray photons directly into electrical charges.
>> They offer high spatial resolution and sharp image clarity.
>>
>> Indirect Conversion FPDs: Use a scintillator layer (like caesium
>> iodide) to turn X-rays into visible light first. A photodetector array
>> (like amorphous silicon) then converts that light into an electrical
>> signal.
>>
>> Solid-State Dental Sensors (CCD and CMOS)
>>
>> Charge-Coupled Device (CCD) Sensors: Couple a scintillator to a
>> silicon chip to transport and read out charges. They provide high
>> sensitivity and low noise, but tend to cost more and use more power.
>>
>>
>> Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor (CMOS) Sensors: Feature
>> individual amplifiers at every pixel, allowing faster readout, lower
>> power usage, and smaller designs. They are standard in modern digital
>> intraoral imaging"
>>
>>
>>
>> Well there you go.
>
> Of note, such high-rez/high-sensitivity sensors
> have been around for over a decade. They keep
> getting better. Even the first were better than
> the usual film pix.
>
> I *think*, but am not sure, that 'direct' is the
> tech of choice now. The sharpness suggests that
> they aren't lighting-up phosphors. The thickness
> of the sensors seems to preclude using fiber-optic
> inserts to isolate off-axis glow.
>
> Anyway, if YOUR dentist is still using film and
> that big x-ray rig .........
>
> Do they keep a jar of leeches too ... ? A foot-
> powered low speed drill ....... ?
>
> Somewhere I found a 'restored' version of one of
> those 19th century drills. All pretty. Tempted to
> buy it for my dentists to keep under glass in
> the lobby :-)
I see one clinic nearby that has cushioned seats shaped as molars.
Surely they fin them cute, but they shoo me away. I will never enter
that place.
No, I would be endeared to finding an old drill in a glass case.
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-05 01:12 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: OT - TV (now radio) |
| Message-ID | <QOKdnfmWqNgprF73nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #723231 |
On 10/4/26 06:35, Carlos E. R. wrote: > On 2026-10-03 05:44, c186282 wrote: >> On 10/2/26 07:40, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> On 01/10/2026 21:03, Carlos E. R. wrote: >>>> On 2026-10-01 13:39, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>>> On 01/10/2026 02:41, J. P. Gilliver wrote: >>>>>> I'm pretty sure my dentist still uses film and X-rays, though they >>>>>> seem >>>>>> to develop (and scan) them_amazingly_ quickly - but they still go >>>>>> out >>>>>> of the room (same principle as the shoe salesmen, I think) to fire >>>>>> the >>>>>> machine. >>>>> >>>>> The changeover to all digital stared about 20 years ago and is not >>>>> yet complete. Because the kit is very expensive and photos work >>>>> pretty well >>>> >>>> The private clinic I go to some times (covered by my insurance) >>>> changed the to digital plates maybe a year ago. I was very surprised >>>> when I noticed them reusing the plate without changing the film, and >>>> asked. >>>> >>>> I did not know there were sensor plates suitable for X-rays. >>>> >>> I am not totally sure, but I think that you can use a standard light >>> sensor in conjunction with a a fluorescent screen. >>> >>> There may well be semiconductor arrays that resonnd directly to X >>> rays as well >>> >>> Umm.... goggle google google... >>> >>> "Flat Panel Detectors (FPDs) >>> >>> Direct Conversion FPDs: Use a semiconductor material (like amorphous >>> selenium) to convert X-ray photons directly into electrical charges. >>> They offer high spatial resolution and sharp image clarity. >>> >>> Indirect Conversion FPDs: Use a scintillator layer (like caesium >>> iodide) to turn X-rays into visible light first. A photodetector >>> array (like amorphous silicon) then converts that light into an >>> electrical signal. >>> >>> Solid-State Dental Sensors (CCD and CMOS) >>> >>> Charge-Coupled Device (CCD) Sensors: Couple a scintillator to a >>> silicon chip to transport and read out charges. They provide high >>> sensitivity and low noise, but tend to cost more and use more power. >>> >>> >>> Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor (CMOS) Sensors: Feature >>> individual amplifiers at every pixel, allowing faster readout, lower >>> power usage, and smaller designs. They are standard in modern digital >>> intraoral imaging" >>> >>> >>> >>> Well there you go. >> >> Of note, such high-rez/high-sensitivity sensors >> have been around for over a decade. They keep >> getting better. Even the first were better than >> the usual film pix. >> >> I *think*, but am not sure, that 'direct' is the >> tech of choice now. The sharpness suggests that >> they aren't lighting-up phosphors. The thickness >> of the sensors seems to preclude using fiber-optic >> inserts to isolate off-axis glow. >> >> Anyway, if YOUR dentist is still using film and >> that big x-ray rig ......... >> >> Do they keep a jar of leeches too ... ? A foot- >> powered low speed drill ....... ? >> >> Somewhere I found a 'restored' version of one of >> those 19th century drills. All pretty. Tempted to >> buy it for my dentists to keep under glass in >> the lobby :-) > > I see one clinic nearby that has cushioned seats shaped as molars. > Surely they fin them cute, but they shoo me away. I will never enter > that place. Ok ... that IS a little weird ........ > No, I would be endeared to finding an old drill in a glass case. What, NO sense of history ? You put the antique drill in a glass case and then a nice color pic/description of the LATEST units and advantages. A little "depth" never hurts IMHO. "Medicine" in general however, a LOT to be kind of embarrassed about. Old bullshit just would NOT die and generations suffered.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-05 14:19 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: OT - TV (now radio) |
| Message-ID | <nihiujFfekcU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #723278 |
On 2026-10-05 07:12, c186282 wrote:
> On 10/4/26 06:35, Carlos E. R. wrote:
>> On 2026-10-03 05:44, c186282 wrote:
>>> On 10/2/26 07:40, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>> On 01/10/2026 21:03, Carlos E. R. wrote:
>>>>> On 2026-10-01 13:39, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>>>> On 01/10/2026 02:41, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
>>>>>>> I'm pretty sure my dentist still uses film and X-rays, though
>>>>>>> they seem
>>>>>>> to develop (and scan) them_amazingly_ quickly - but they still
>>>>>>> go out
>>>>>>> of the room (same principle as the shoe salesmen, I think) to
>>>>>>> fire the
>>>>>>> machine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The changeover to all digital stared about 20 years ago and is
>>>>>> not yet complete. Because the kit is very expensive and photos
>>>>>> work pretty well
>>>>>
>>>>> The private clinic I go to some times (covered by my insurance)
>>>>> changed the to digital plates maybe a year ago. I was very
>>>>> surprised when I noticed them reusing the plate without changing
>>>>> the film, and asked.
>>>>>
>>>>> I did not know there were sensor plates suitable for X-rays.
>>>>>
>>>> I am not totally sure, but I think that you can use a standard light
>>>> sensor in conjunction with a a fluorescent screen.
>>>>
>>>> There may well be semiconductor arrays that resonnd directly to X
>>>> rays as well
>>>>
>>>> Umm.... goggle google google...
>>>>
>>>> "Flat Panel Detectors (FPDs)
>>>>
>>>> Direct Conversion FPDs: Use a semiconductor material (like amorphous
>>>> selenium) to convert X-ray photons directly into electrical charges.
>>>> They offer high spatial resolution and sharp image clarity.
>>>>
>>>> Indirect Conversion FPDs: Use a scintillator layer (like caesium
>>>> iodide) to turn X-rays into visible light first. A photodetector
>>>> array (like amorphous silicon) then converts that light into an
>>>> electrical signal.
>>>>
>>>> Solid-State Dental Sensors (CCD and CMOS)
>>>>
>>>> Charge-Coupled Device (CCD) Sensors: Couple a scintillator to a
>>>> silicon chip to transport and read out charges. They provide high
>>>> sensitivity and low noise, but tend to cost more and use more power.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor (CMOS) Sensors: Feature
>>>> individual amplifiers at every pixel, allowing faster readout, lower
>>>> power usage, and smaller designs. They are standard in modern
>>>> digital intraoral imaging"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well there you go.
>>>
>>> Of note, such high-rez/high-sensitivity sensors
>>> have been around for over a decade. They keep
>>> getting better. Even the first were better than
>>> the usual film pix.
>>>
>>> I *think*, but am not sure, that 'direct' is the
>>> tech of choice now. The sharpness suggests that
>>> they aren't lighting-up phosphors. The thickness
>>> of the sensors seems to preclude using fiber-optic
>>> inserts to isolate off-axis glow.
>>>
>>> Anyway, if YOUR dentist is still using film and
>>> that big x-ray rig .........
>>>
>>> Do they keep a jar of leeches too ... ? A foot-
>>> powered low speed drill ....... ?
>>>
>>> Somewhere I found a 'restored' version of one of
>>> those 19th century drills. All pretty. Tempted to
>>> buy it for my dentists to keep under glass in
>>> the lobby :-)
>>
>> I see one clinic nearby that has cushioned seats shaped as molars.
>> Surely they fin them cute, but they shoo me away. I will never enter
>> that place.
>
> Ok ... that IS a little weird ........
>
>> No, I would be endeared to finding an old drill in a glass case.
(I would not be endeared... typo.
>
> What, NO sense of history ?
>
> You put the antique drill in a glass case and
> then a nice color pic/description of the LATEST
> units and advantages. A little "depth" never
> hurts IMHO.
I prefer not to know too much about what they do to me. I take a
tranquillizer pill, and I close my eyes. I had bad experiences, so they
make me nervous.
>
> "Medicine" in general however, a LOT to be kind of
> embarrassed about. Old bullshit just would NOT die
> and generations suffered.
My old doctor had a felt case with old scalpels and tools, maybe medieval.
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-01 15:34 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: OT - TV (now radio) |
| Message-ID | <ni75r7Fpqe0U11@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #723051 |
On 2026-10-01 03:41, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
> On 2026/10/1 0:7:51, Carlos E. R. wrote:
>> On 2026-09-30 21:28, c186282 wrote:
>>> On 9/30/26 05:58, Carlos E.R. wrote:
>>>> On 2026-09-29 20:16, rbowman wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2026 10:45:58 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> None of this was 'science' - it was just fiddling with things to see
>>>>>> what happened and teaching the useful results to the next generation.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://ethw.org/Edison_Effect
>>>>>
>>>>> Almost all of Edison's successes resulted from intense fiddling. He even
>>>>> played a part in the development of the fluoroscope but gave up the
>>>>> project when one of assistants died from exposure. The risks weren't
>>>>> well
>>>>> known. I remember the machines in shoe stores in the '50s where you
>>>>> could
>>>>> peer at an x-ray of your feet to see how well the shoes fit.
>>>>
>>>> Progress :-)
>>>
>>> I remember those machines ! By the time I might
>>> have needed one though they'd all been unplugged
>>> and shoved into a corner.
>>>
>>> Apparently the prob wasn't with the customers, but
>>> with the salesmen who might get a dozen doses a day.
>>>
>>> Now ... MIGHT replace the net effect using some kind
>>> of ultra-sound image.
>>
>> X-Ray machines were high power, not even doctors use them nowdays. They
>> use photos instead, now made with a electronic sensors, not chemicals.
>> So very low power.
>>
> I'm pretty sure my dentist still uses film and X-rays, though they seem
> to develop (and scan) them _amazingly_ quickly - but they still go out
> of the room (same principle as the shoe salesmen, I think) to fire the
> machine.
Mine uses what looks the same machine, but the result is a 3D
computerized scan. He can look up a single tooth in the computer and
rotate it, find how deep goes the caries...
I don't believe they use chemicals.
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-30 21:46 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: OT - TV (now radio) |
| Message-ID | <f7adnU7RVOkbJiD3nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #723043 |
On 9/30/26 19:07, Carlos E. R. wrote: > On 2026-09-30 21:28, c186282 wrote: >> On 9/30/26 05:58, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>> On 2026-09-29 20:16, rbowman wrote: >>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2026 10:45:58 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>> >>>>> None of this was 'science' - it was just fiddling with things to see >>>>> what happened and teaching the useful results to the next generation. >>>> >>>> https://ethw.org/Edison_Effect >>>> >>>> Almost all of Edison's successes resulted from intense fiddling. He >>>> even >>>> played a part in the development of the fluoroscope but gave up the >>>> project when one of assistants died from exposure. The risks weren't >>>> well >>>> known. I remember the machines in shoe stores in the '50s where you >>>> could >>>> peer at an x-ray of your feet to see how well the shoes fit. >>> >>> Progress :-) >> >> I remember those machines ! By the time I might >> have needed one though they'd all been unplugged >> and shoved into a corner. >> >> Apparently the prob wasn't with the customers, but >> with the salesmen who might get a dozen doses a day. >> >> Now ... MIGHT replace the net effect using some kind >> of ultra-sound image. > > X-Ray machines were high power, not even doctors use them nowdays. They > use photos instead, now made with a electronic sensors, not chemicals. > So very low power. A sensitive grid of pressure sensors could likely do a fair job of it - but might not show "pinched toes" quite as well. Some 'hybrid' tech - pressure sensors PLUS low-rez ultrasound - would surely do the trick quite well and maybe cheaper than those old X-ray units. Have seen some news on medical devices that use triple-tech ... low-field MRI plus ultrasound plus low-rez CAT. Computers can now easily combine the results and create a much higher rez and richer result than any alone. Even Linux has some standard packages for doing MRIs and similar. I wonder if any of those old x-ray units are stored anywhere. Might be useful for imaging other materials and devices and such. At 'salvage' prices, great ! Just keep yer distance a bit :-) Bound to be lots of old DENTAL units in some surplus warehouse too. Building a relatively 'soft' x-ray tube using lab glassware does not seem so difficult. Need a fairly good vac pump. but nothing TOO extreme. You can buy thin little moly metal squares. A 50KV DC supply and you're set. Hey, it is 19th-century tech ...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-04 16:07 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: OT - TV (now radio) |
| Message-ID | <nif8djF4q5gU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #723053 |
c186282 wrote: > I wonder if any of those old x-ray units are stored anywhere. Might > be useful for imaging other materials and devices and such. At > 'salvage' prices, great ! > > Just keep yer distance a bit 🙂 Lots of NOS x-ray tubes in Ukraine <https://www.ebay.com.au/sch/i.html?_nkw=x-ray+tube&_sacat=0&_from=R40&Country%2520of%2520Origin=Ukraine&_dcat=64627>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-04 18:27 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: OT - TV (now radio) |
| Message-ID | <119u2a3$3glq$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #723246 |
On 04/10/2026 16:07, Andy Burns wrote: > > c186282 wrote: > >> I wonder if any of those old x-ray units are stored anywhere. Might >> be useful for imaging other materials and devices and such. At >> 'salvage' prices, great ! >> >> Just keep yer distance a bit 🙂 > > Lots of NOS x-ray tubes in Ukraine > > <https://www.ebay.com.au/sch/i.html?_nkw=x-ray+tube&_sacat=0&_from=R40&Country%2520of%2520Origin=Ukraine&_dcat=64627> > > X-ray 'tubes' are not very dangerous. Its those Cobalt 60 sources used to burn cancers to a crisp you should avoid... -- Civilization exists by geological consent, subject to change without notice. – Will Durant
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-05 02:42 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: OT - TV (now radio) |
| Message-ID | <QOKdnfqWqNhQ2173nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #723246 |
On 10/4/26 11:07, Andy Burns wrote: > > c186282 wrote: > >> I wonder if any of those old x-ray units are stored anywhere. Might >> be useful for imaging other materials and devices and such. At >> 'salvage' prices, great ! >> >> Just keep yer distance a bit 🙂 > > Lots of NOS x-ray tubes in Ukraine > > <https://www.ebay.com.au/sch/i.html?_nkw=x- > ray+tube&_sacat=0&_from=R40&Country%2520of%2520Origin=Ukraine&_dcat=64627> Good ... but nowhere near Ukraine. My greatest interest, getting a few shots of kinda 'sealed' devices.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-01 06:50 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: OT - TV (now radio) |
| Message-ID | <119kvrq$u9er$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #723043 |
>"Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>wrote: >>On 2026-09-30 21:28, c186282 wrote: >> On 9/30/26 05:58, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>> On 2026-09-29 20:16, rbowman wrote: >>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2026 10:45:58 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>> >>>>> None of this was 'science' - it was just fiddling with things to see >>>>> what happened and teaching the useful results to the next generation. >>>> >>>> https://ethw.org/Edison_Effect >>>> >>>> Almost all of Edison's successes resulted from intense fiddling. He even >>>> played a part in the development of the fluoroscope but gave up the >>>> project when one of assistants died from exposure. The risks weren't >>>> well >>>> known. I remember the machines in shoe stores in the '50s where you >>>> could >>>> peer at an x-ray of your feet to see how well the shoes fit. >>> >>> Progress :-) >> >> I remember those machines ! By the time I might >> have needed one though they'd all been unplugged >> and shoved into a corner. >> >> Apparently the prob wasn't with the customers, but >> with the salesmen who might get a dozen doses a day. >> >> Now ... MIGHT replace the net effect using some kind >> of ultra-sound image. > >X-Ray machines were high power, not even doctors use them nowdays. They >use photos instead, now made with a electronic sensors, not chemicals. >So very low power. Old tube color TVs had a PD500 stabilizer tube in parallel with the high voltage. Those emitted xrays and were always housed in a metal case. At work some guy got some burn in his face after working on a monitor with the metal shield removed. All monitors at work were tested for radiation after that! You can make your own Xray machine with those tubes: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=PD500+make+your+own+xray+generator http://www.qrp.gr/page/xrays/pd500.htm
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-01 03:32 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: OT - TV (now radio) |
| Message-ID | <bNGdndQjQvbnkSP3nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #723063 |
On 10/1/26 02:50, Jan Panteltje wrote: >> "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>wrote: >>> On 2026-09-30 21:28, c186282 wrote: >>> On 9/30/26 05:58, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>>> On 2026-09-29 20:16, rbowman wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2026 10:45:58 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> None of this was 'science' - it was just fiddling with things to see >>>>>> what happened and teaching the useful results to the next generation. >>>>> >>>>> https://ethw.org/Edison_Effect >>>>> >>>>> Almost all of Edison's successes resulted from intense fiddling. He even >>>>> played a part in the development of the fluoroscope but gave up the >>>>> project when one of assistants died from exposure. The risks weren't >>>>> well >>>>> known. I remember the machines in shoe stores in the '50s where you >>>>> could >>>>> peer at an x-ray of your feet to see how well the shoes fit. >>>> >>>> Progress :-) >>> >>> I remember those machines ! By the time I might >>> have needed one though they'd all been unplugged >>> and shoved into a corner. >>> >>> Apparently the prob wasn't with the customers, but >>> with the salesmen who might get a dozen doses a day. >>> >>> Now ... MIGHT replace the net effect using some kind >>> of ultra-sound image. >> >> X-Ray machines were high power, not even doctors use them nowdays. They >> use photos instead, now made with a electronic sensors, not chemicals. >> So very low power. > > Old tube color TVs had a PD500 stabilizer tube in parallel with the high voltage. > Those emitted xrays and were always housed in a metal case. > At work some guy got some burn in his face after working on a monitor > with the metal shield removed. > All monitors at work were tested for radiation after that! > > You can make your own Xray machine with those tubes: > https://duckduckgo.com/?q=PD500+make+your+own+xray+generator > > http://www.qrp.gr/page/xrays/pd500.htm Had a very old color TV ... it had nearly an INCH of lead-glass over the tube to cut the X-rays. The glass had become a bit cloudy due to long exposure :-) Yea, THAT bad.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-01 12:37 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: OT - TV (now radio) |
| Message-ID | <119lgmd$147lq$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #723043 |
On 01/10/2026 00:07, Carlos E. R. wrote: > On 2026-09-30 21:28, c186282 wrote: >> On 9/30/26 05:58, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>> On 2026-09-29 20:16, rbowman wrote: >>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2026 10:45:58 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>> >>>>> None of this was 'science' - it was just fiddling with things to see >>>>> what happened and teaching the useful results to the next generation. >>>> >>>> https://ethw.org/Edison_Effect >>>> >>>> Almost all of Edison's successes resulted from intense fiddling. He >>>> even >>>> played a part in the development of the fluoroscope but gave up the >>>> project when one of assistants died from exposure. The risks weren't >>>> well >>>> known. I remember the machines in shoe stores in the '50s where you >>>> could >>>> peer at an x-ray of your feet to see how well the shoes fit. >>> >>> Progress :-) >> >> I remember those machines ! By the time I might >> have needed one though they'd all been unplugged >> and shoved into a corner. >> >> Apparently the prob wasn't with the customers, but >> with the salesmen who might get a dozen doses a day. >> >> Now ... MIGHT replace the net effect using some kind >> of ultra-sound image. > > X-Ray machines were high power, not even doctors use them nowdays. They > use photos instead, now made with a electronic sensors, not chemicals. > So very low power. > ITYM fluoroscopes. Not x-ray machines. We still use x-ray machines Plenty of older photo style machines still in use. Although fluoroscopes (real time x-ray imagers) are now pulsed digital for less radiactioacvity -- There’s a mighty big difference between good, sound reasons and reasons that sound good. Burton Hillis (William Vaughn, American columnist)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-01 22:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: OT - TV (now radio) |
| Message-ID | <ni7t1mFe6mU8@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #723077 |
On 2026-10-01 13:37, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 01/10/2026 00:07, Carlos E. R. wrote:
>> On 2026-09-30 21:28, c186282 wrote:
>>> On 9/30/26 05:58, Carlos E.R. wrote:
>>>> On 2026-09-29 20:16, rbowman wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2026 10:45:58 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> None of this was 'science' - it was just fiddling with things to see
>>>>>> what happened and teaching the useful results to the next generation.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://ethw.org/Edison_Effect
>>>>>
>>>>> Almost all of Edison's successes resulted from intense fiddling. He
>>>>> even
>>>>> played a part in the development of the fluoroscope but gave up the
>>>>> project when one of assistants died from exposure. The risks
>>>>> weren't well
>>>>> known. I remember the machines in shoe stores in the '50s where you
>>>>> could
>>>>> peer at an x-ray of your feet to see how well the shoes fit.
>>>>
>>>> Progress :-)
>>>
>>> I remember those machines ! By the time I might
>>> have needed one though they'd all been unplugged
>>> and shoved into a corner.
>>>
>>> Apparently the prob wasn't with the customers, but
>>> with the salesmen who might get a dozen doses a day.
>>>
>>> Now ... MIGHT replace the net effect using some kind
>>> of ultra-sound image.
>>
>> X-Ray machines were high power, not even doctors use them nowdays.
>> They use photos instead, now made with a electronic sensors, not
>> chemicals. So very low power.
>>
> ITYM fluoroscopes. Not x-ray machines. We still use x-ray machines
>
> Plenty of older photo style machines still in use.
>
> Although fluoroscopes (real time x-ray imagers) are now pulsed digital
> for less radiactioacvity
I have not seen doctors using them in ages.
My old doctor, now retired, had a bronze plate at the entrance to the
building (his clinic was in a residential flat) that said he had an
X-Ray machine. As a kid those things were used often (on me). This
doctor never used the machine in the XXI century. I don't know if he
removed the machine or not.
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-01 23:45 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: OT - TV (now radio) |
| Message-ID | <U-6cnfcZmrh7tSL3nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #723107 |
On 10/1/26 16:10, Carlos E. R. wrote: > On 2026-10-01 13:37, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 01/10/2026 00:07, Carlos E. R. wrote: >>> On 2026-09-30 21:28, c186282 wrote: >>>> On 9/30/26 05:58, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>>>> On 2026-09-29 20:16, rbowman wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2026 10:45:58 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> None of this was 'science' - it was just fiddling with things to see >>>>>>> what happened and teaching the useful results to the next >>>>>>> generation. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://ethw.org/Edison_Effect >>>>>> >>>>>> Almost all of Edison's successes resulted from intense fiddling. >>>>>> He even >>>>>> played a part in the development of the fluoroscope but gave up the >>>>>> project when one of assistants died from exposure. The risks >>>>>> weren't well >>>>>> known. I remember the machines in shoe stores in the '50s where >>>>>> you could >>>>>> peer at an x-ray of your feet to see how well the shoes fit. >>>>> >>>>> Progress :-) >>>> >>>> I remember those machines ! By the time I might >>>> have needed one though they'd all been unplugged >>>> and shoved into a corner. >>>> >>>> Apparently the prob wasn't with the customers, but >>>> with the salesmen who might get a dozen doses a day. >>>> >>>> Now ... MIGHT replace the net effect using some kind >>>> of ultra-sound image. >>> >>> X-Ray machines were high power, not even doctors use them nowdays. >>> They use photos instead, now made with a electronic sensors, not >>> chemicals. So very low power. >>> >> ITYM fluoroscopes. Not x-ray machines. We still use x-ray machines >> >> Plenty of older photo style machines still in use. >> >> Although fluoroscopes (real time x-ray imagers) are now pulsed digital >> for less radiactioacvity > > I have not seen doctors using them in ages. Really WAY WAY too much radiation, and not just for the patient. Enough rays to light up a screen the human eye can see - extreme. I think there are alt-approach solutions now, like if they're trying to place a cardiac stent or whatever. The docs do NOT stand in the radiation path anymore though. But, through the 50s, radiation was measured in friendly "sunshine units" :-) > My old doctor, now retired, had a bronze plate at the entrance to the > building (his clinic was in a residential flat) that said he had an X- > Ray machine. As a kid those things were used often (on me). This doctor > never used the machine in the XXI century. I don't know if he removed > the machine or not. I'll buy it if it's still in a storage closet ! :-) Modern 'devices' are more compact and CLOSED than ever. WOULD like to be able to see into them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 28 of 36 — ← Prev page 1 … 26 27 [28] 29 30 … 36 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web