Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #288691 > unrolled thread
| Started by | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-04-09 15:59 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-04-10 19:41 +0000 |
| Articles | 9 on this page of 29 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
fucking chrome owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-09 15:59 +0000
Re: fucking chrome owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-09 16:06 +0000
Re: fucking chrome DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-09 12:14 -0400
Re: fucking chrome owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-09 16:25 +0000
Re: fucking chrome "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-09 12:31 -0400
Re: fucking chrome Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-09 18:35 +0200
Re: fucking chrome chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-09 12:21 -0500
Re: fucking chrome GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-09 12:01 -0600
Re: fucking chrome "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-09 14:12 -0400
Re: fucking chrome GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-09 20:06 -0600
Re: braindead wintrolls & icultists ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-09 20:28 +0000
Re: fucking chrome DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-09 13:19 -0400
Re: fucking chrome owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-09 17:26 +0000
Re: fucking chrome Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-09 14:20 -0400
Re: fucking chrome Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-09 09:36 -0700
Re: fucking chrome owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-09 17:36 +0000
Re: fucking chrome Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-09 11:32 -0700
Re: fucking chrome owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-09 19:11 +0000
Re: fucking chrome Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-09 18:15 +0200
Re: fucking chrome owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-09 16:23 +0000
More puling about obvious behavior Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-09 13:25 -0400
married to a praying mantis owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-09 17:56 +0000
Re: married to a praying mantis Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-09 11:00 -0700
Chris Ahlstrom Is Married To A Praying Mantis JermGerm <jeremywalmartprescottaz@gmail.com> - 2015-04-09 11:17 -0700
Re: Chris Ahlstrom Is Married To A Praying Mantis Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-09 14:25 -0400
Re: More puling about obvious behavior chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-09 19:34 +0000
Re: fucking chrome ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-09 20:26 +0000
Re: fucking chrome DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-09 19:56 -0400
Re: fucking chrome owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-10 19:41 +0000
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-09 13:25 -0400 |
| Subject | More puling about obvious behavior |
| Message-ID | <mg6ckm$5rt$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #288701 |
Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On Thu, 9 Apr 2015 15:59:11 +0000 (UTC) > owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Why does chrome not want to obey the window manager settings? >> I have windows set to "roll up" when I double-click the title bar. >> Chrome, alone among all apps, insists on maximizing instead. Works fine on Fluxbox. With or without "Use system titlebar and borders set". If unset, you have both Fluxbox caption bar and the Chrome caption bar. And two different behaviors. > I don't use chrome any more but isn't it that you can set to use > window manager or not? He's a puling idiot. -- Dear Ms. Postnews: I couldn't get mail through to somebody on another site. What should I do? -- Eager Beaver Dear Eager: No problem, just post your message to a group that a lot of people read. Say, "This is for John Smith. I couldn't get mail through so I'm posting it. All others please ignore." This way tens of thousands of people will spend a few seconds scanning over and ignoring your article, using up over 16 man-hours their collective time, but you will be saved the terrible trouble of checking through usenet maps or looking for alternate routes. Just think, if you couldn't distribute your message to 9000 other computers, you might actually have to (gasp) call directory assistance for 60 cents, or even phone the person. This can cost as much as a few DOLLARS (!) for a 5 minute call! And certainly it's better to spend 10 to 20 dollars of other people's money distributing the message than for you to have to waste $9 on an overnight letter, or even 25 cents on a stamp! Don't forget. The world will end if your message doesn't get through, so post it as many places as you can. -- Emily Postnews Answers Your Questions on Netiquette
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-09 17:56 +0000 |
| Subject | married to a praying mantis |
| Message-ID | <mvngjib93.jgi@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #288713 |
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> On Thu, 9 Apr 2015 15:59:11 +0000 (UTC) >> owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Why does chrome not want to obey the window manager settings? >>> I have windows set to "roll up" when I double-click the title bar. >>> Chrome, alone among all apps, insists on maximizing instead. > Works fine on Fluxbox. With or without "Use system titlebar and borders > set". If unset, you have both Fluxbox caption bar and the Chrome caption > bar. And two different behaviors. >> I don't use chrome any more but isn't it that you can set to use >> window manager or not? > He's a puling idiot. Get back to work wiping pee pees Chris Ahlstrom.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-09 11:00 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: married to a praying mantis |
| Message-ID | <9bd4a864-3d4c-46bb-8850-137bc2850736@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #288718 |
On Thursday, April 9, 2015 at 11:56:04 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: > Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > > Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > > >> On Thu, 9 Apr 2015 15:59:11 +0000 (UTC) > >> owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> > >>> Why does chrome not want to obey the window manager settings? > >>> I have windows set to "roll up" when I double-click the title bar. > >>> Chrome, alone among all apps, insists on maximizing instead. > > > Works fine on Fluxbox. With or without "Use system titlebar and borders > > set". If unset, you have both Fluxbox caption bar and the Chrome caption > > bar. And two different behaviors. > > >> I don't use chrome any more but isn't it that you can set to use > >> window manager or not? > > > He's a puling idiot. > > Get back to work wiping pee pees Chris Ahlstrom. Try "pee pee", glue" or your favorite COLAite's name: http://demsites.atwebpages.com/site/demo/ (I'm testing angular in a WP theme)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JermGerm <jeremywalmartprescottaz@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-09 11:17 -0700 |
| Subject | Chris Ahlstrom Is Married To A Praying Mantis |
| Message-ID | <580c9190-db8a-447a-be81-d933adc3a92a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #288713 |
On Thursday, April 9, 2015 at 1:25:36 PM UTC-4, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > > > On Thu, 9 Apr 2015 15:59:11 +0000 (UTC) > > owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > > >> Why does chrome not want to obey the window manager settings? > >> I have windows set to "roll up" when I double-click the title bar. > >> Chrome, alone among all apps, insists on maximizing instead. > > Works fine on Fluxbox. With or without "Use system titlebar and borders > set". If unset, you have both Fluxbox caption bar and the Chrome caption > bar. And two different behaviors. > > > I don't use chrome any more but isn't it that you can set to use > > window manager or not? > > He's a puling idiot. Still changing subject lines Chris "Little Beaver" Ahlstrom. Jayne Ahlstrom isn't going to be happy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-09 14:25 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Chris Ahlstrom Is Married To A Praying Mantis |
| Message-ID | <mg6g4k$ki6$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #288731 |
On 2015-04-09 2:17 PM, JermGerm wrote: > On Thursday, April 9, 2015 at 1:25:36 PM UTC-4, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> On Thu, 9 Apr 2015 15:59:11 +0000 (UTC) >>> owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Why does chrome not want to obey the window manager settings? >>>> I have windows set to "roll up" when I double-click the title bar. >>>> Chrome, alone among all apps, insists on maximizing instead. >> >> Works fine on Fluxbox. With or without "Use system titlebar and borders >> set". If unset, you have both Fluxbox caption bar and the Chrome caption >> bar. And two different behaviors. >> >>> I don't use chrome any more but isn't it that you can set to use >>> window manager or not? >> >> He's a puling idiot. > > Still changing subject lines Chris "Little Beaver" Ahlstrom. > Jayne Ahlstrom isn't going to be happy. It's his favourite activity after wiping dicks and agreeing with any stupid comment a Linux loser makes. I've lost hope that the guy will ever grow a pair and had no choice but to filter him. -- Slimer OpenMedia, GreenPeace Supporter & SPCA Paw Partner Encrypt.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-09 19:34 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: More puling about obvious behavior |
| Message-ID | <5526d45b$0$10768$4c5efc6d@fastusenet.org> |
| In reply to | #288713 |
Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >> bowel wrote: >>> >>> Why does chrome not want to obey the window manager settings? >>> I have windows set to "roll up" when I double-click the title bar. >>> Chrome, alone among all apps, insists on maximizing instead. > > Works fine on Fluxbox. With or without "Use system titlebar and borders > set". If unset, you have both Fluxbox caption bar and the Chrome > caption bar. And two different behaviors. Works fine here, on Mint. > He's a puling idiot. Bowel has been smoking crack again. -- "What monopoly?" - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-09 20:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mg6n8p$h8m$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #288701 |
On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 18:15:00 +0200, Melzzzzz wrote: > On Thu, 9 Apr 2015 15:59:11 +0000 (UTC) > owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Why does chrome not want to obey the window manager settings? >> I have windows set to "roll up" when I double-click the title bar. >> Chrome, alone among all apps, insists on maximizing instead. LINUX GET >> YOUR SHIT TOGETHER! >> >> > I don't use chrome any more but isn't it that you can set to use window > manager or not? Dang "owl" has a rough life. Poor thing. It's like the whole world is conspiring against him. -- To WinDrones and iCultists obsessed with Linux. Get a life.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-09 19:56 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mg73ha$1vk$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #288691 |
On 04/09/2015 11:59 AM, owl wrote: > Why does chrome not want to obey the window manager settings? > I have windows set to "roll up" when I double-click the title bar. That's a gay thing, right? > Chrome, alone among all apps, insists on maximizing instead. > LINUX GET YOUR SHIT TOGETHER! Same here on xfce: everything else rolls up (it's called 'shade window' on xfce), but Chrome maximizes on dbl-click. Chrome also doesn't inherit the chosen xfce window manager style (I found a nice one called Gtk).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-10 19:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hgbvye0.3a@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #288691 |
Tralfaz <directly_above_the_center_of_the_earth@santas_deer_poop_too_much.org> wrote: > On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 15:59:11 +0000, owl wrote: >> Why does chrome not want to obey the window manager settings? >> I have windows set to "roll up" when I double-click the title bar. >> Chrome, alone among all apps, insists on maximizing instead. LINUX GET >> YOUR SHIT TOGETHER! > You've never been accused of being intelligent, right? In other words, you can't answer the question.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web