Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #694697 > unrolled thread
| Started by | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-08-13 14:28 -0400 |
| Last post | 2025-09-02 10:52 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 137 — 10 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-13 14:28 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jaworski1978@adres.pl> - 2025-08-13 21:16 +0200
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-13 15:40 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jaworski1978@adres.pl> - 2025-08-13 23:15 +0200
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-13 20:39 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jaworski1978@adres.pl> - 2025-08-13 23:34 +0200
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-13 20:46 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jaworski1978@adres.pl> - 2025-08-14 06:25 +0200
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-14 07:31 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-14 08:16 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-14 07:29 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-14 11:13 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-14 23:51 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-14 20:27 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-15 08:51 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 07:07 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-17 00:17 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-15 08:07 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-15 18:56 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-15 15:28 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 07:09 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-15 19:35 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-15 17:31 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-15 22:18 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-15 20:34 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 07:16 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-16 10:33 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 07:14 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 07:13 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-16 10:32 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-17 00:28 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 07:12 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-16 10:32 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-15 19:17 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-15 15:31 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-15 20:24 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-15 16:02 -0500
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-15 22:58 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-16 08:36 -0500
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-16 14:44 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-16 11:06 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-16 14:44 -0500
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-17 08:45 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-17 03:26 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-17 09:15 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-17 22:15 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 10:36 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-18 08:41 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-17 09:16 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-17 22:16 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 10:56 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-18 08:43 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-16 14:41 -0500
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-17 08:43 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-17 00:48 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-17 09:04 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 10:26 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-18 08:58 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-19 00:36 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 06:35 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-08-16 18:16 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-17 00:54 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 07:34 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-16 10:36 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-17 09:21 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-17 09:36 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-20 01:46 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 21:52 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-20 22:33 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-20 23:12 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 07:50 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-08-21 15:03 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-21 23:44 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-08-22 13:00 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-22 18:08 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 07:49 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-21 08:15 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-21 08:10 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-23 09:48 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-26 07:31 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-26 19:08 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-30 09:10 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-31 08:27 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-20 03:59 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 06:30 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-20 08:17 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-20 08:14 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-17 20:02 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-15 17:34 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-16 08:11 -0500
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 07:27 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 07:23 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-16 10:35 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-17 00:34 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-17 09:18 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-17 20:20 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 11:02 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-18 09:04 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-19 03:12 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 07:05 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-19 09:33 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 06:42 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 07:19 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-17 00:25 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-17 09:06 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-17 00:58 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-17 09:08 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-17 09:45 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-17 10:15 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-17 09:50 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-17 22:13 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 10:17 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-18 08:54 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 06:28 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-18 08:37 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 06:23 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-19 09:41 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 06:27 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 09:45 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 06:14 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-19 03:10 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 07:13 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-17 09:10 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-17 22:07 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 10:34 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-18 08:31 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-17 19:55 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-14 07:28 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-14 11:12 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-14 18:10 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-14 00:39 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-17 01:01 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-17 09:11 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-17 22:19 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-18 08:46 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-02 06:50 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-09-02 10:52 -0400
Page 4 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 Next page →
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-16 18:16 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <107r005$1t1mb$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #694954 |
On 8/16/25 09:36, chrisv wrote: > Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: > >> chrisv wrote: >>> >>> Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: >>>> >>>> I care about what people are doing today. >>> >>> Same here, which is why it's so perplexing that the West is >>> welcoming-in hoards of Muslim invaders who hate their society and >>> would/will gladly subjugate or kill them, when they have a chance. >> >> As I said, the west tries to help people who's life is unsafe in their >> countries. Which is a good thing. > > But you should know that that is not what is happening. What is > happening is hordes of mostly military-aged men are allowed to flood > in, with almost all of them are "economic" refuges (if not, in fact, > the Vanguard of an invasion). Median age for refugees is ~16 years old; roughly half of the global median age. And for US refugees specifically, here's a chart: <https://www.statista.com/statistics/247063/number-of-refugees-arriving-in-the-us-by-age/> Using 50/50 for gender and ages 20-39 for military age, gender excludes 18% of those within-age and 63% are excluded as too young or too old: 18% + 63% = 81% = ~80% of refugees just aren't "military-aged men". >> all Muslims are not the same, but it's a to difficult concept >> for a limited far right guy to understand. > > Everyone understands that. But in every Muslim society, the radicals > run the show and make the rules. Iran, Afghanistan, Gaza, you name > it. A small group of violent men control the direction of those > societies. Any particular reason why the country with the largest Muslim population was neglected from being mentioned? Or did they not fit your stereotype of a bunch of radical dictators? Or was it because their per capita crime rate is lower than the USA... FWIW, I've even been to this particular country & didn't have any problems & found the locals to be quite pleasant...what's been your personal experience there? No, watching Faux gNews doesn't count. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-17 00:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mgcnhgFjqp7U6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #694983 |
On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 18:16:37 -0400, -hh wrote: > Using 50/50 for gender and ages 20-39 for military age, gender excludes > 18% of those within-age and 63% are excluded as too young or too old: > 18% + 63% = 81% = ~80% of refugees just aren't "military-aged men". Have you seen photos of the hordes lined up at the border? Were those exceedingly ugly Lesbians in the crowd?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-16 07:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <107pcb0$1iojo$10@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #694868 |
On 2025-08-15, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: > >> I care about what people are doing today. > > Same here, which is why it's so perplexing that the West is > welcoming-in hoards of Muslim invaders who hate their society and > would/will gladly subjugate or kill them, when they have a chance. It's right in their "holy books." Tolerate other religions until you're in the majority. The self-loathing Europeans are starting to experience Muslims in the majority now — things will get worse, unless they grow spines and fight back. -- Definition of Insanity: Thinking you can beat the Bear on his own territory.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-16 10:36 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <8I0oQ.98928$_vf6.85052@fx12.iad> |
| In reply to | #694915 |
On 2025-08-16 3:34 a.m., RonB wrote: > On 2025-08-15, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: >> >>> I care about what people are doing today. >> >> Same here, which is why it's so perplexing that the West is >> welcoming-in hoards of Muslim invaders who hate their society and >> would/will gladly subjugate or kill them, when they have a chance. > > It's right in their "holy books." Tolerate other religions until you're in > the majority. The self-loathing Europeans are starting to experience Muslims > in the majority now — things will get worse, unless they grow spines and > fight back. I think France needs to be conquered for seven centuries like Spain was to eventually realize why muslims shouldn't be in the West. Of course, I say that but the Spanish are themselves letting this garbage in. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage Islam is the enemy John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-17 09:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <107s6tu$26kgt$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #694961 |
On 2025-08-16, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > On 2025-08-16 3:34 a.m., RonB wrote: >> On 2025-08-15, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: >>> >>>> I care about what people are doing today. >>> >>> Same here, which is why it's so perplexing that the West is >>> welcoming-in hoards of Muslim invaders who hate their society and >>> would/will gladly subjugate or kill them, when they have a chance. >> >> It's right in their "holy books." Tolerate other religions until you're in >> the majority. The self-loathing Europeans are starting to experience Muslims >> in the majority now — things will get worse, unless they grow spines and >> fight back. > > I think France needs to be conquered for seven centuries like Spain was > to eventually realize why muslims shouldn't be in the West. Of course, I > say that but the Spanish are themselves letting this garbage in. They have been letting them in, but there seems to a rumblings of revolt against this policy in Spain recently. Even the Germans seem to be waking up a little (probably too late). -- Definition of Insanity: Thinking you can beat the Bear on his own territory.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-17 09:36 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <uVkoQ.88233$fST5.39631@fx18.iad> |
| In reply to | #695034 |
On 2025-08-17 5:21 a.m., RonB wrote: > On 2025-08-16, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >> On 2025-08-16 3:34 a.m., RonB wrote: >>> On 2025-08-15, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: >>>> >>>>> I care about what people are doing today. >>>> >>>> Same here, which is why it's so perplexing that the West is >>>> welcoming-in hoards of Muslim invaders who hate their society and >>>> would/will gladly subjugate or kill them, when they have a chance. >>> >>> It's right in their "holy books." Tolerate other religions until you're in >>> the majority. The self-loathing Europeans are starting to experience Muslims >>> in the majority now — things will get worse, unless they grow spines and >>> fight back. >> >> I think France needs to be conquered for seven centuries like Spain was >> to eventually realize why muslims shouldn't be in the West. Of course, I >> say that but the Spanish are themselves letting this garbage in. > > They have been letting them in, but there seems to a rumblings of revolt > against this policy in Spain recently. Even the Germans seem to be waking > up a little (probably too late). The hot-headedness of the typical Spanish person might actually help them get rid of the garbage that's flowing into their borders. Nevertheless, the Spanish might have a lot of difficulty getting rid of them since identifying these people is going to be doubly difficult. After all, the Spanish themselves share genes with the invaders and look a lot like them, having been conquered by these monsters for so many centuries. Also, even if you do decide to deport, the countries that allowed these people to migrate to Europe won't want them back since they have already been identified as being garbage. Short of sending them to some uninhabited island or shooting them in the back of the head, there is not much than can be done. That's why it is important to never let them in. As for Germany, it is definitely too late. They will surrender to the muslims before long. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage Islam is the enemy John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-20 01:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <10839eb$2gt2$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #695067 |
On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 09:36:24 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > After all, the Spanish themselves share genes with the invaders and look > a lot like them ... Had a DNA test yourself? I can remember a bunch of white supremacists in the USA getting DNA testing a few years ago to prove their “whiteness”, only to discover that part of their ancestry came, not just from slaveowners, but from their slaves as well. Big surprise, that when you put people living and working side-by-side over centuries, that in spite of any kind of ideological indoctrination and insistence that one side is inferior and isn’t even supposed to be considered human, they start creating some offspring together? They were furious and in major denial, claiming the DNA testing was all lies. Of course it wasn’t.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-19 21:52 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nT9pQ.3$Csge.0@fx02.iad> |
| In reply to | #695275 |
On 8/19/25 9:46 PM, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 09:36:24 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > >> After all, the Spanish themselves share genes with the invaders and look >> a lot like them ... > > Had a DNA test yourself? > > I can remember a bunch of white supremacists in the USA getting DNA > testing a few years ago to prove their “whiteness”, only to discover that > part of their ancestry came, not just from slaveowners, but from their > slaves as well. > > Big surprise, that when you put people living and working side-by-side > over centuries, that in spite of any kind of ideological indoctrination > and insistence that one side is inferior and isn’t even supposed to be > considered human, they start creating some offspring together? > > They were furious and in major denial, claiming the DNA testing was all > lies. Of course it wasn’t. Yup, I have a tiny shred of black DNA myself, one of my many personalities is a Nubian prince, the idea of racial purity is pretty dumb when one looks at the simple fact that "interracial" people have in reality a superior, healthier, more resilient genome. -- Joel W. Crump
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-20 22:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1085ig9$j3am$10@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #695276 |
On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 21:52:19 -0400, Joel W. Crump wrote: > Yup, I have a tiny shred of black DNA myself, one of my many > personalities is a Nubian prince, the idea of racial purity is pretty > dumb when one looks at the simple fact that "interracial" people have in > reality a superior, healthier, more resilient genome. I have blood relatives of just about every shade of the human spectrum. If anybody were to accuse me of having “racist” beliefs, I would say I am a “culturist”, not a “racist”. Different cultures can have some characteristics that are superior to others (and some characteristics that are inferior), that’s not a genetic thing. Anyway, “culture” is not something you are born into (like the genes you get from your parents), it is something you acquire. Cultures pick up things from each other over time, that’s inherent in the human capacity for learning new ideas. And besides, “race” is not a scientific concept.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-20 23:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mgn323Fc31mU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #695379 |
On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 22:33:46 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > And besides, “race” is not a scientific concept. Then what, exactly, is affirmative action, reparations, and so forth based on?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-21 07:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1086j3u$qb6r$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #695394 |
On 2025-08-20, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 22:33:46 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > >> And besides, “race” is not a scientific concept. > > Then what, exactly, is affirmative action, reparations, and so forth based > on? Good question. I wonder if you'll get an answer. -- Definition of Insanity: Thinking you can beat the Bear on his own territory.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-21 15:03 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <1087qhd$14787$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #695394 |
rbowman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code: > On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 22:33:46 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > >> And besides, “race” is not a scientific concept. > > Then what, exactly, is affirmative action, reparations, and so forth based > on? Uh, Lawrence merely noted it is not a scientific concept. It's just a rough grouping of people by various characterstics. Race depends on who is doing the categorizing. -- Because I do, Because I do not hope, Because I do not hope to survive Injustice from the Palace, death from the air, Because I do, only do, I continue... -- T. S. Pynchon
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-21 23:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mgppbrFpunbU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #695499 |
On Thu, 21 Aug 2025 15:03:08 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > rbowman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code: > >> On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 22:33:46 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: >> >>> And besides, “race” is not a scientific concept. >> >> Then what, exactly, is affirmative action, reparations, and so forth >> based on? > > Uh, Lawrence merely noted it is not a scientific concept. > > It's just a rough grouping of people by various characterstics. > > Race depends on who is doing the categorizing. Thank you for the non-answer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-22 13:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <108a7ni$1lr35$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #695533 |
rbowman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2025 15:03:08 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> rbowman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
>>
>>> On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 22:33:46 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
>>>
>>>> And besides, “race” is not a scientific concept.
>>>
>>> Then what, exactly, is affirmative action, reparations, and so forth
>>> based on?
>>
>> Uh, Lawrence merely noted it is not a scientific concept.
>>
>> It's just a rough grouping of people by various characterstics.
>>
>> Race depends on who is doing the categorizing.
>
> Thank you for the non-answer.
"Then what, exactly, is affirmative action, reparations, and
so forth based on?"
Thank you for the unanswerable question.
--
If I traveled to the end of the rainbow
As Dame Fortune did intend,
Murphy would be there to tell me
The pot's at the other end.
-- Bert Whitney
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-22 18:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mgrq06F5phpU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #695639 |
On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 13:00:34 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > rbowman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code: > >> On Thu, 21 Aug 2025 15:03:08 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >> >>> rbowman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code: >>> >>>> On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 22:33:46 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: >>>> >>>>> And besides, “race” is not a scientific concept. >>>> >>>> Then what, exactly, is affirmative action, reparations, and so forth >>>> based on? >>> >>> Uh, Lawrence merely noted it is not a scientific concept. >>> >>> It's just a rough grouping of people by various characterstics. >>> >>> Race depends on who is doing the categorizing. >> >> Thank you for the non-answer. > > "Then what, exactly, is affirmative action, reparations, and so > forth based on?" > > Thank you for the unanswerable question. So, since 1965, the US government has singled out classes of people for preferential treatment with no objective criteria? Understood. The Communists had their nomenklatura, the US has its special snowflakes. I've noticed the Kiwi rapidly dropped the thread leaving his left hand man to continue it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-21 07:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1086j2j$qb6r$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #695379 |
On 2025-08-20, Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: > On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 21:52:19 -0400, Joel W. Crump wrote: > >> Yup, I have a tiny shred of black DNA myself, one of my many >> personalities is a Nubian prince, the idea of racial purity is pretty >> dumb when one looks at the simple fact that "interracial" people have in >> reality a superior, healthier, more resilient genome. > > I have blood relatives of just about every shade of the human spectrum. So do I. Most of us do. We're all mongrels. It doesn't change the fact that Muslim thugs are overruning Europe and raping and killing the native population. > If anybody were to accuse me of having “racist” beliefs, I would say I am > a “culturist”, not a “racist”. Different cultures can have some > characteristics that are superior to others (and some characteristics that > are inferior), that’s not a genetic thing. Anyway, “culture” is not > something you are born into (like the genes you get from your parents), it > is something you acquire. Cultures pick up things from each other over > time, that’s inherent in the human capacity for learning new ideas. > > And besides, “race” is not a scientific concept. -- Definition of Insanity: Thinking you can beat the Bear on his own territory.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-21 08:15 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <B5EpQ.9$9wA1.3@fx36.iad> |
| In reply to | #695452 |
On 2025-08-21 3:49 a.m., RonB wrote: > On 2025-08-20, Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: >> On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 21:52:19 -0400, Joel W. Crump wrote: >> >>> Yup, I have a tiny shred of black DNA myself, one of my many >>> personalities is a Nubian prince, the idea of racial purity is pretty >>> dumb when one looks at the simple fact that "interracial" people have in >>> reality a superior, healthier, more resilient genome. >> >> I have blood relatives of just about every shade of the human spectrum. > > So do I. Most of us do. We're all mongrels. It doesn't change the fact that > Muslim thugs are overruning Europe and raping and killing the native > population. And the only appropriate punishment, especially if their true origins can't be identified, is a bullet to the back of the head. They purposely get rid of their papers to make it impossible to deport them, particularly the migrants coming into the United States or Canada, so they might as well be destined to death if caught. Besides, no legal consequence has so far deterred them, and muslims are particularly happy to go to prison since they will be surrounded by like-minded cretins there. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage Islam is the enemy John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-21 08:10 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <A0EpQ.46589$P2c3.29387@fx12.iad> |
| In reply to | #695379 |
On 2025-08-20 6:33 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 21:52:19 -0400, Joel W. Crump wrote: > >> Yup, I have a tiny shred of black DNA myself, one of my many >> personalities is a Nubian prince, the idea of racial purity is pretty >> dumb when one looks at the simple fact that "interracial" people have in >> reality a superior, healthier, more resilient genome. > > I have blood relatives of just about every shade of the human spectrum. > > If anybody were to accuse me of having “racist” beliefs, I would say I am > a “culturist”, not a “racist”. Different cultures can have some > characteristics that are superior to others (and some characteristics that > are inferior), that’s not a genetic thing. Anyway, “culture” is not > something you are born into (like the genes you get from your parents), it > is something you acquire. Cultures pick up things from each other over > time, that’s inherent in the human capacity for learning new ideas. > > And besides, “race” is not a scientific concept. The leftists want you to believe that, but race is indeed a scientific concept. The facts are inconvenient to them, but there are significant differences between negroids and mongoloids and between caucasians and indigenous. No mongoloid would want to be told that he has the intelligence potential of a negroid though it would be a humongous compliment to the negroid to be told the opposite. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage Islam is the enemy John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-23 09:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <68a98e88$0$3369$426a34cc@news.free.fr> |
| In reply to | #695379 |
Le 20-08-2025, Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> a écrit : > On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 21:52:19 -0400, Joel W. Crump wrote: > >> Yup, I have a tiny shred of black DNA myself, one of my many >> personalities is a Nubian prince, the idea of racial purity is pretty >> dumb when one looks at the simple fact that "interracial" people have in >> reality a superior, healthier, more resilient genome. > > I have blood relatives of just about every shade of the human spectrum. You are sure about that? The human spectrum is huge. In some parts of Africa, there is more diversity than in the rest of the all world combined. I know, some guys here believe that all black people are the same but that doesn't make them right. And you shouldn't be proud about that. The purity is the most important thing in the world. Look at the purest finest king Charles II of Spain proved it only by existing. The ultimate proof: the purest, the best. -- Si vous avez du temps à perdre : https://scarpet42.gitlab.io
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-26 07:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <108jnrv$3tb4m$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #695694 |
On 23 Aug 2025 09:48:56 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: > Le 20-08-2025, Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> a écrit : >> >> On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 21:52:19 -0400, Joel W. Crump wrote: >> >>> Yup, I have a tiny shred of black DNA myself, one of my many >>> personalities is a Nubian prince, the idea of racial purity is pretty >>> dumb when one looks at the simple fact that "interracial" people have >>> in reality a superior, healthier, more resilient genome. >> >> I have blood relatives of just about every shade of the human spectrum. > > You are sure about that? The human spectrum is huge. In some parts of > Africa, there is more diversity than in the rest of the all world > combined. Genetic diversity, yes. Skin colour ... how much blacker than black can you get? They seem no darker than many South Indians, to me. > And you shouldn't be proud about that. The purity is the most important > thing in the world. Look at the purest finest king Charles II of Spain > proved it only by existing. The ultimate proof: the purest, the best. Whereas someone like me or my rellies, on the other hand, could have been right in the gas ovens if we had been around the wrong place at the wrong time ...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web