Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #694697 > unrolled thread
| Started by | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-08-13 14:28 -0400 |
| Last post | 2025-09-02 10:52 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 137 — 10 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-13 14:28 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jaworski1978@adres.pl> - 2025-08-13 21:16 +0200
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-13 15:40 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jaworski1978@adres.pl> - 2025-08-13 23:15 +0200
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-13 20:39 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jaworski1978@adres.pl> - 2025-08-13 23:34 +0200
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-13 20:46 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jaworski1978@adres.pl> - 2025-08-14 06:25 +0200
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-14 07:31 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-14 08:16 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-14 07:29 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-14 11:13 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-14 23:51 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-14 20:27 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-15 08:51 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 07:07 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-17 00:17 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-15 08:07 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-15 18:56 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-15 15:28 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 07:09 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-15 19:35 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-15 17:31 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-15 22:18 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-15 20:34 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 07:16 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-16 10:33 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 07:14 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 07:13 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-16 10:32 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-17 00:28 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 07:12 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-16 10:32 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-15 19:17 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-15 15:31 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-15 20:24 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-15 16:02 -0500
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-15 22:58 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-16 08:36 -0500
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-16 14:44 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-16 11:06 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-16 14:44 -0500
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-17 08:45 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-17 03:26 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-17 09:15 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-17 22:15 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 10:36 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-18 08:41 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-17 09:16 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-17 22:16 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 10:56 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-18 08:43 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-16 14:41 -0500
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-17 08:43 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-17 00:48 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-17 09:04 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 10:26 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-18 08:58 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-19 00:36 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 06:35 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-08-16 18:16 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-17 00:54 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 07:34 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-16 10:36 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-17 09:21 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-17 09:36 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-20 01:46 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 21:52 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-20 22:33 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-20 23:12 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 07:50 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-08-21 15:03 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-21 23:44 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-08-22 13:00 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-22 18:08 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 07:49 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-21 08:15 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-21 08:10 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-23 09:48 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-26 07:31 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-26 19:08 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-30 09:10 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-31 08:27 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-20 03:59 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 06:30 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-20 08:17 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-20 08:14 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-17 20:02 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-15 17:34 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-16 08:11 -0500
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 07:27 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 07:23 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-16 10:35 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-17 00:34 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-17 09:18 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-17 20:20 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 11:02 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-18 09:04 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-19 03:12 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 07:05 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-19 09:33 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 06:42 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 07:19 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-17 00:25 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-17 09:06 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-17 00:58 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-17 09:08 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-17 09:45 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-17 10:15 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-17 09:50 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-17 22:13 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 10:17 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-18 08:54 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 06:28 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-18 08:37 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 06:23 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-19 09:41 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 06:27 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 09:45 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 06:14 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-19 03:10 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 07:13 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-17 09:10 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-17 22:07 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 10:34 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-18 08:31 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-17 19:55 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-14 07:28 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-14 11:12 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-14 18:10 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-14 00:39 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-17 01:01 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-17 09:11 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-17 22:19 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-18 08:46 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-02 06:50 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-09-02 10:52 -0400
Page 3 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 Next page →
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-16 11:06 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <Q71oQ.63698$fST5.32400@fx18.iad> |
| In reply to | #694964 |
On 2025-08-16 10:44 a.m., Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: > Le 16-08-2025, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> a écrit : >> Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: >> >>> chrisv wrote: >>>> >>>> Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I care about what people are doing today. >>>> >>>> Same here, which is why it's so perplexing that the West is >>>> welcoming-in hoards of Muslim invaders who hate their society and >>>> would/will gladly subjugate or kill them, when they have a chance. >>> >>> As I said, the west tries to help people who's life is unsafe in their >>> countries. Which is a good thing. >> >> But you should know that that is not what is happening. What is >> happening is hordes of mostly military-aged men are allowed to flood >> in, with almost all of them are "economic" refuges (if not, in fact, >> the Vanguard of an invasion). > > Yes, but it's a secret, nobody should know about it. In France we aren't > seventy millions anymore. We are two hundred millions. The Muslims took > control of everything. All the French women are raped twice a day by > Muslims. All the churches have been either burned or replaced by > Mosques. All Christians have been killed, only Muslims stay here. I'm > hiding to stay alive. But it's too difficult to say aloud, it must be > kept as a secret. Still waiting for you to provide biblical passages condoning pedophilia, Stéphane. >>> all Muslims are not the same, but it's a to difficult concept >>> for a limited far right guy to understand. >> >> Everyone understands that. > > No. The Canadian don't and your message proves you don't. CrudeSausage, or SaucisseCrue if you prefer. It's just a matter of time before like your countrymen, you flee the consequence of your arrogance to Québec and become a Canadian too. I should warn you though: our government doesn't care for white immigrants; they open their arms to niggers (both the tropical and sand varieties) and spics. You might want to start preparing for the fact that muhammad and his friends muhammad, muhammad, muhammad, muhammad, muhammad, Amine, muhammad, muhammad, muhammad and Ayoub will be beheading you. >> But in every Muslim society, the radicals run the show and make the >> rules. Iran, Afghanistan, Gaza, you name it. > > You see? You don't make the difference. From what I read here I guess > you have been operated to change your sex. If that's right, you should > be careful with the body you choose to side on. Because, if that's > right, far right people want to kill you as much as Islamists. > > In France Islamists don't come from Islamists societies. They come from > Muslims societies like Morocco and Egypt from which they are fought. Provide evidence that the "far right" is killing people. Then, provide evidence that the number of murders they are responsible for is comparable to the number of murders attributed to muslims. >> A small group of >> violent men control the direction of those societies. >> >>> So with their hatred they help Islamists to gather every Muslims. >> >> It's the Muslims who are the haters. > > You mean RonB and the Canadian are Muslims? Because all of their > messages are full of hatred. How shocking that we would hate people who intend to kill us! We are no better than the people who literally rape children and behead Christians in large numbers in Africa. >> They are the invaders, not us. > > I guessed you are living in the US. If so, you are an invader. Ask the > native what they think about it. Well ask the natives you didn't kill > because they are not that many today. The Natives lost a series of wars. That's how war works. muslims understand this which is why they are already preparing for the civil war which will take your land away from you. >> We must fight back, > > You are a Muslim? Because it's a hatred message and you claim that the > haters are the Muslims. The US are the enemy of the rest of the world. > They developed drug trafic in Latin America and in Afghanistan. They > invaded Irak for fun pretending they have mass destruction weapons but > stay there when they didn't found any. They help Israel kill people for > fun to reinforce Hamas. Provide evidence that Israel is killing people for fun and make sure that the newspaper articles you will cite are not getting their "evidence" from Hamas directly. Their allegations and approximations are not evidence. >> before it's too late, or they will run right over us. > > If you are an American, as I believe, keep away from other countries. You > only help Islamists and I don't want advise from people who are happy > with Trump. > > But remember: if you have been operated to change your sexe, the far > right are not your friends. You'll discover it the hard way one day. No matter how many operations you go through, you can't change your sex. A man who believes himself to be a woman will not be able to get pregnant no matter what he does. Similarly, a woman who believes herself a man will not be able to impregnate a woman no matter what she does. At best, they are deluding themselves and whoever encourages their delusions is a monster. Get a clue, Stéphane. You're embarrassing yourself here. Find God. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage Islam is the enemy John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-16 14:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <4qn1ak5mp1qckbbumqfms2ghqgpio74gci@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #694968 |
CrudeSausage wrote: >Get a clue, Stéphane. You're embarrassing yourself here. Find God. I'm wondering if he has a daughter or a sister that he could ask about the Muslim creeps that make it unsafe for them to walk outside. Or maybe he's out in the rural areas where things are still OK.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-17 08:45 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <D9koQ.206091$Bui1.79161@fx10.iad> |
| In reply to | #694978 |
On 2025-08-16 3:44 p.m., chrisv wrote: > CrudeSausage wrote: > >> Get a clue, Stéphane. You're embarrassing yourself here. Find God. > > I'm wondering if he has a daughter or a sister that he could ask about > the Muslim creeps that make it unsafe for them to walk outside. Or > maybe he's out in the rural areas where things are still OK. He's probably right outside the city in the suburbs. Since the problem hasn't yet reached him, he's happily repeating liberal narratives. If he has a son or daughter and one gets beaten and the other raped, I would bet that he would be the first to say that it was his son's fault for not showing respect or his daughter's fault for dressing inappropriately. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage Islam is the enemy John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-17 03:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <107ri50$22lcn$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #694968 |
On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 11:06:24 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > Still waiting for you to provide biblical passages condoning > pedophilia ... <https://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/says_about/Pedophilia.html> Numbers 31:1-18: “But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.” Deuteronomy 20:10-14: “But the women, and the little ones, and the cattle, and all that is in the city, even all the spoil thereof, shalt thou take unto thyself.” Judges 21:7-11: “And they found among the inhabitants of Jabeshgilead four hundred young virgins, that had known no man by lying with any male: and they brought them unto the camp to Shiloh.” Judges 21:20-23: “Go and lie in wait in the vineyards; And see, and, behold, if the daughters of Shiloh come out to dance in dances, then come ye out of the vineyards, and catch you every man his wife of the daughters of Shiloh ... And the children of Benjamin did so, and took them wives, according to their number, of them that danced, whom they caught.” Exodus 21:7-10: “if a man sell his daughter to be a maidservant ... If she please not her master, who hath betrothed her to himself, then shall he let her be redeemed ... If he take him another wife; her food, her raiment, and her duty of marriage, shall he not diminish.”
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-17 09:15 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <XBkoQ.113371$_vf6.92513@fx12.iad> |
| In reply to | #695020 |
On 2025-08-16 11:26 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 11:06:24 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > >> Still waiting for you to provide biblical passages condoning >> pedophilia ... > > <https://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/says_about/Pedophilia.html> > > Numbers 31:1-18: “But all the women children, that have not known a man by > lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.” > > Deuteronomy 20:10-14: “But the women, and the little ones, and the cattle, > and all that is in the city, even all the spoil thereof, shalt thou take > unto thyself.” > > Judges 21:7-11: “And they found among the inhabitants of Jabeshgilead four > hundred young virgins, that had known no man by lying with any male: and > they brought them unto the camp to Shiloh.” > > Judges 21:20-23: “Go and lie in wait in the vineyards; And see, and, > behold, if the daughters of Shiloh come out to dance in dances, then come > ye out of the vineyards, and catch you every man his wife of the daughters > of Shiloh ... And the children of Benjamin did so, and took them wives, > according to their number, of them that danced, whom they caught.” > > Exodus 21:7-10: “if a man sell his daughter to be a maidservant ... If she > please not her master, who hath betrothed her to himself, then shall he > let her be redeemed ... If he take him another wife; her food, her > raiment, and her duty of marriage, shall he not diminish.” Pray tell, which of those is from the New Testament? Also, which of those quotes encourages pedophilia or even sleeping with a child? -- God be with you, CrudeSausage Islam is the enemy John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-17 22:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <107tka2$2kffr$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #695063 |
On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 09:15:33 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > On 2025-08-16 11:26 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: >> >> On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 11:06:24 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >> >>> Still waiting for you to provide biblical passages condoning >>> pedophilia ... >> >> <https://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/says_about/Pedophilia.html> > > Pray tell, which of those is from the New Testament? You did ask for “biblical passages”, did you not? Is the Old Testament somehow less “Biblical” than the New? <https://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/contra/otlaw.html>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-18 10:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <107uvn0$2vqpe$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #695100 |
On 2025-08-17, Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: > On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 09:15:33 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > >> On 2025-08-16 11:26 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 11:06:24 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >>> >>>> Still waiting for you to provide biblical passages condoning >>>> pedophilia ... >>> >>> <https://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/says_about/Pedophilia.html> >> >> Pray tell, which of those is from the New Testament? > > You did ask for “biblical passages”, did you not? Is the Old Testament > somehow less “Biblical” than the New? > ><https://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/contra/otlaw.html> It's definitely less relevant to Christianity. Yes. -- Definition of Insanity: Thinking you can beat the Bear on his own territory.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-18 08:41 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <7cFoQ.42050$fpLb.14421@fx44.iad> |
| In reply to | #695100 |
On 2025-08-17 6:15 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 09:15:33 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > >> On 2025-08-16 11:26 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 11:06:24 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >>> >>>> Still waiting for you to provide biblical passages condoning >>>> pedophilia ... >>> >>> <https://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/says_about/Pedophilia.html> >> >> Pray tell, which of those is from the New Testament? > > You did ask for “biblical passages”, did you not? Is the Old Testament > somehow less “Biblical” than the New? > > <https://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/contra/otlaw.html> The entirety of Christianity is based on what's written in the New Testament. While the Old Testament (in Psalms 22 written 700 years before Christ's emergence) predicts Jesus's coming and Christ himself referred to it, it is not at the core of the religion. Besides, absolutely none of the passages you brought forward encourage or endorse pedophilia. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage Islam is the enemy John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-17 09:16 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <HCkoQ.52379$hYw5.24010@fx11.iad> |
| In reply to | #695020 |
On 2025-08-16 11:26 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 11:06:24 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > >> Still waiting for you to provide biblical passages condoning >> pedophilia ... > > <https://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/says_about/Pedophilia.html> > > Numbers 31:1-18: “But all the women children, that have not known a man by > lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.” > > Deuteronomy 20:10-14: “But the women, and the little ones, and the cattle, > and all that is in the city, even all the spoil thereof, shalt thou take > unto thyself.” > > Judges 21:7-11: “And they found among the inhabitants of Jabeshgilead four > hundred young virgins, that had known no man by lying with any male: and > they brought them unto the camp to Shiloh.” > > Judges 21:20-23: “Go and lie in wait in the vineyards; And see, and, > behold, if the daughters of Shiloh come out to dance in dances, then come > ye out of the vineyards, and catch you every man his wife of the daughters > of Shiloh ... And the children of Benjamin did so, and took them wives, > according to their number, of them that danced, whom they caught.” > > Exodus 21:7-10: “if a man sell his daughter to be a maidservant ... If she > please not her master, who hath betrothed her to himself, then shall he > let her be redeemed ... If he take him another wife; her food, her > raiment, and her duty of marriage, shall he not diminish.” Also, first line right at the top of your link: The Bible has nothing to say against pedophilia. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage Islam is the enemy John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-17 22:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <107tkbb$2kffr$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #695064 |
On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 09:16:22 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > Also, first line right at the top of your link: The Bible has nothing to > say against pedophilia. You freely admit that??
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-18 10:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <107v0t4$2vqpe$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #695101 |
On 2025-08-17, Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: > On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 09:16:22 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > >> Also, first line right at the top of your link: The Bible has nothing to >> say against pedophilia. > > You freely admit that?? The Bible teaches that scandalizing the "little ones" deserves a millstone being hung around the scandalizers' necks while they're tossed into the ocean. So, yeah, the Bible is definitely anti pedophile perverts. And apparently you're unaware that the Catholic Church has both the Bible and the Authoritative Magisterium, with its _Ex Cathedra_ pronouncements. These words from Jesus on children can also be mentioned... Let the children come to me, do not hinder them; for to such belongs to the Kingdom of heaven.” —Matthew 19 Up until recently no one had to speak out in favor of childhood innocence, it was assumed in Christendom. (And yes, I know there were abuses in Europe as well in the lands of the Muslims. The difference was it was a shameful thing for the Catholics, it was an accepted practice by the Muslims, because their "holy book" allowed it.) -- Definition of Insanity: Thinking you can beat the Bear on his own territory.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-18 08:43 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <4eFoQ.42051$fpLb.35782@fx44.iad> |
| In reply to | #695101 |
On 2025-08-17 6:16 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 09:16:22 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > >> Also, first line right at the top of your link: The Bible has nothing to >> say against pedophilia. > > You freely admit that?? If it has nothing to say about pedophilia, then it neither speaks for or against it. However, Jesus himself said in Matthew 18:6 "But whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened around his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea." -- God be with you, CrudeSausage Islam is the enemy John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-16 14:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <e9n1akdi6k20hhtkj8vrh5u4s2bhe843f2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #694964 |
Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: > (idiocy snipped) The only thing in your post that wasn't complete gibberish was about the whites being the invaders in North America. But how about England? How about Germany? How about France? How about Portugal? The Muslims are invading and ruining every Western democracy that has allowed it. All the other points that I made you side-stepped by spewing gibberish. Since you clearly have no interest in reasoned debate, your response will be deleted, unread.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-17 08:43 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <G7koQ.206090$Bui1.176030@fx10.iad> |
| In reply to | #694977 |
On 2025-08-16 3:41 p.m., chrisv wrote: > Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: > >> (idiocy snipped) > > The only thing in your post that wasn't complete gibberish was about > the whites being the invaders in North America. But how about > England? How about Germany? How about France? How about Portugal? > The Muslims are invading and ruining every Western democracy that has > allowed it. > > All the other points that I made you side-stepped by spewing > gibberish. > > Since you clearly have no interest in reasoned debate, your response > will be deleted, unread. I'm glad you mentioned Portugal. When we visited Lisbon n 2017, one of the people we talked to in a store seemed to believe that a socialist government was the right choice for the people. After visiting the Portuguese Azores in July though, it seems that the people of Portugal are now regretting their decision. In exchange for bribes, the socialists let in a ton of Africans and muslims over the past few years. Lisbon, which was still quite beautiful in 2017 but ravaged by graffiti just about everywhere, has now turned into a cesspool filled with muslim criminals, African thieves and Indian and Bangladeshi filth everywhere else. According to the news we watched, it looks like the government is already taking serious steps to get rid of the garbage, partly because the Portuguese are very proudly Catholic and don't intend to sacrifice their culture to the islamic sewage which aims to conquer it. I could only hope that the Portuguese people themselves, the Spanish and the French could look to their history and _remember_ how many battles they had to fight against these people to hold onto their countries. muslims haven't changed; they are the same kind of trash they always were. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage Islam is the enemy John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-17 00:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mgcn68Fjqp7U5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #694964 |
On 16 Aug 2025 14:44:29 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: > Yes, but it's a secret, nobody should know about it. In France we aren't > seventy millions anymore. We are two hundred millions. The Muslims took > control of everything. All the French women are raped twice a day by > Muslims. All the churches have been either burned or replaced by > Mosques. All Christians have been killed, only Muslims stay here. I'm > hiding to stay alive. But it's too difficult to say aloud, it must be > kept as a secret. Jean Raspail wrote the book over 50 years ago but you didn't listen. He did have the wrong group of invaders though. India was in dire straits in the '70s but it survived and has prospered, at least some of the classes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-17 09:04 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <%rkoQ.113370$_vf6.63433@fx12.iad> |
| In reply to | #695011 |
On 2025-08-16 8:48 p.m., rbowman wrote: > On 16 Aug 2025 14:44:29 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: > >> Yes, but it's a secret, nobody should know about it. In France we aren't >> seventy millions anymore. We are two hundred millions. The Muslims took >> control of everything. All the French women are raped twice a day by >> Muslims. All the churches have been either burned or replaced by >> Mosques. All Christians have been killed, only Muslims stay here. I'm >> hiding to stay alive. But it's too difficult to say aloud, it must be >> kept as a secret. > > Jean Raspail wrote the book over 50 years ago but you didn't listen. He > did have the wrong group of invaders though. India was in dire straits in > the '70s but it survived and has prospered, at least some of the classes. I think that he didn't specifically target the Muslims because he knew that they would gladly cut off his head for criticizing him in the slightest. However, what he imagined has turned to reality and the world's garbage is now flooding the West looking for a handout. They expect us to happily give them money and a free home because that's what the traffickers tell them to expect upon their arrival. Since they also believe that white women exist solely for their amusement, it shouldn't be surprising that they're harassing them looking for "a kiss" which always translates to free sex. Meanwhile, you have emasculated people believing that it is the West's responsibility to take them in because we somehow caused their poverty. Somehow, we were the ones telling them to have ten children per woman despite having no way of taking care of themselves much less children. We were also the ones telling them to eat the seeds we sent them to plant rather than do any kind of agriculture. Apparently, we were also the ones telling them to pray five times a day and kill anyone who prayed slightly differently. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage Islam is the enemy John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-18 10:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <107uv58$2vqpe$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #695059 |
On 2025-08-17, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > On 2025-08-16 8:48 p.m., rbowman wrote: >> On 16 Aug 2025 14:44:29 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: >> >>> Yes, but it's a secret, nobody should know about it. In France we aren't >>> seventy millions anymore. We are two hundred millions. The Muslims took >>> control of everything. All the French women are raped twice a day by >>> Muslims. All the churches have been either burned or replaced by >>> Mosques. All Christians have been killed, only Muslims stay here. I'm >>> hiding to stay alive. But it's too difficult to say aloud, it must be >>> kept as a secret. >> >> Jean Raspail wrote the book over 50 years ago but you didn't listen. He >> did have the wrong group of invaders though. India was in dire straits in >> the '70s but it survived and has prospered, at least some of the classes. > > I think that he didn't specifically target the Muslims because he knew > that they would gladly cut off his head for criticizing him in the > slightest. However, what he imagined has turned to reality and the > world's garbage is now flooding the West looking for a handout. They > expect us to happily give them money and a free home because that's what > the traffickers tell them to expect upon their arrival. Since they also > believe that white women exist solely for their amusement, it shouldn't > be surprising that they're harassing them looking for "a kiss" which > always translates to free sex. > > Meanwhile, you have emasculated people believing that it is the West's > responsibility to take them in because we somehow caused their poverty. > Somehow, we were the ones telling them to have ten children per woman > despite having no way of taking care of themselves much less children. > We were also the ones telling them to eat the seeds we sent them to > plant rather than do any kind of agriculture. Apparently, we were also > the ones telling them to pray five times a day and kill anyone who > prayed slightly differently. This was planned by the Rothschilds to destroy the West. The destruction of Libya and the following "Arab Spring" revolts were yet more engineered mob uprisings by the same slimeballs who engineered the mob uprising against Jesus, nearly 2000 years ago. Their methods never change. Satan and his myrmidons are nothing if not monotonous. (See Revelation 2:9 and 3:9) -- Definition of Insanity: Thinking you can beat the Bear on his own territory.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-18 08:58 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ArFoQ.151833$Fhs6.132804@fx17.iad> |
| In reply to | #695117 |
On 2025-08-18 6:26 a.m., RonB wrote: > On 2025-08-17, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >> On 2025-08-16 8:48 p.m., rbowman wrote: >>> On 16 Aug 2025 14:44:29 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, but it's a secret, nobody should know about it. In France we aren't >>>> seventy millions anymore. We are two hundred millions. The Muslims took >>>> control of everything. All the French women are raped twice a day by >>>> Muslims. All the churches have been either burned or replaced by >>>> Mosques. All Christians have been killed, only Muslims stay here. I'm >>>> hiding to stay alive. But it's too difficult to say aloud, it must be >>>> kept as a secret. >>> >>> Jean Raspail wrote the book over 50 years ago but you didn't listen. He >>> did have the wrong group of invaders though. India was in dire straits in >>> the '70s but it survived and has prospered, at least some of the classes. >> >> I think that he didn't specifically target the Muslims because he knew >> that they would gladly cut off his head for criticizing him in the >> slightest. However, what he imagined has turned to reality and the >> world's garbage is now flooding the West looking for a handout. They >> expect us to happily give them money and a free home because that's what >> the traffickers tell them to expect upon their arrival. Since they also >> believe that white women exist solely for their amusement, it shouldn't >> be surprising that they're harassing them looking for "a kiss" which >> always translates to free sex. >> >> Meanwhile, you have emasculated people believing that it is the West's >> responsibility to take them in because we somehow caused their poverty. >> Somehow, we were the ones telling them to have ten children per woman >> despite having no way of taking care of themselves much less children. >> We were also the ones telling them to eat the seeds we sent them to >> plant rather than do any kind of agriculture. Apparently, we were also >> the ones telling them to pray five times a day and kill anyone who >> prayed slightly differently. > > This was planned by the Rothschilds to destroy the West. The destruction of > Libya and the following "Arab Spring" revolts were yet more engineered > mob uprisings by the same slimeballs who engineered the mob uprising against > Jesus, nearly 2000 years ago. Their methods never change. Satan and his > myrmidons are nothing if not monotonous. > > (See Revelation 2:9 and 3:9) I have to admit that when I read Revelation as a teenager, I could not imagine how any of the things described could come to pass. Now, I am shaken by how accurate much of it turned out to be. What's more shocking is that people like Lawrence could have access to this prophecy, see it happening before his eyes and _still_ deny that there is validity to the Bible. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage Islam is the enemy John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-19 00:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mghv94FgalmU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #695136 |
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 08:58:05 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > I have to admit that when I read Revelation as a teenager, I could not > imagine how any of the things described could come to pass. Now, I am > shaken by how accurate much of it turned out to be. What's more shocking > is that people like Lawrence could have access to this prophecy, see it > happening before his eyes and _still_ deny that there is validity to the > Bible. Apocalypse wasn't on the menu. When I finally got around to reading in I wondered what sort of herb they grew on Patmos.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-19 06:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <10815um$3io6f$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #695136 |
On 2025-08-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> On 2025-08-18 6:26 a.m., RonB wrote:
>> On 2025-08-17, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>> On 2025-08-16 8:48 p.m., rbowman wrote:
>>>> On 16 Aug 2025 14:44:29 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yes, but it's a secret, nobody should know about it. In France we aren't
>>>>> seventy millions anymore. We are two hundred millions. The Muslims took
>>>>> control of everything. All the French women are raped twice a day by
>>>>> Muslims. All the churches have been either burned or replaced by
>>>>> Mosques. All Christians have been killed, only Muslims stay here. I'm
>>>>> hiding to stay alive. But it's too difficult to say aloud, it must be
>>>>> kept as a secret.
>>>>
>>>> Jean Raspail wrote the book over 50 years ago but you didn't listen. He
>>>> did have the wrong group of invaders though. India was in dire straits in
>>>> the '70s but it survived and has prospered, at least some of the classes.
>>>
>>> I think that he didn't specifically target the Muslims because he knew
>>> that they would gladly cut off his head for criticizing him in the
>>> slightest. However, what he imagined has turned to reality and the
>>> world's garbage is now flooding the West looking for a handout. They
>>> expect us to happily give them money and a free home because that's what
>>> the traffickers tell them to expect upon their arrival. Since they also
>>> believe that white women exist solely for their amusement, it shouldn't
>>> be surprising that they're harassing them looking for "a kiss" which
>>> always translates to free sex.
>>>
>>> Meanwhile, you have emasculated people believing that it is the West's
>>> responsibility to take them in because we somehow caused their poverty.
>>> Somehow, we were the ones telling them to have ten children per woman
>>> despite having no way of taking care of themselves much less children.
>>> We were also the ones telling them to eat the seeds we sent them to
>>> plant rather than do any kind of agriculture. Apparently, we were also
>>> the ones telling them to pray five times a day and kill anyone who
>>> prayed slightly differently.
>>
>> This was planned by the Rothschilds to destroy the West. The destruction of
>> Libya and the following "Arab Spring" revolts were yet more engineered
>> mob uprisings by the same slimeballs who engineered the mob uprising against
>> Jesus, nearly 2000 years ago. Their methods never change. Satan and his
>> myrmidons are nothing if not monotonous.
>>
>> (See Revelation 2:9 and 3:9)
>
> I have to admit that when I read Revelation as a teenager, I could not
> imagine how any of the things described could come to pass. Now, I am
> shaken by how accurate much of it turned out to be. What's more shocking
> is that people like Lawrence could have access to this prophecy, see it
> happening before his eyes and _still_ deny that there is validity to the
> Bible.
13 Therefore do I speak to them in parables: because seeing they see
not, and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand. 14 And the
prophecy of Isaias is fulfilled in them, who saith: By hearing you
shall hear, and shall not understand: and seeing you shall see, and
shall not perceive. 15 For the heart of this people is grown gross, and
with their ears they have been dull of hearing, and their eyes they
have shut: lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear
with their ears, and understand with their heart, and be converted, and
I should heal them. —St. Matthew 13
--
Definition of Insanity: Thinking you can
beat the Bear on his own territory.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web