Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #694697 > unrolled thread
| Started by | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-08-13 14:28 -0400 |
| Last post | 2025-09-02 10:52 -0400 |
| Articles | 17 on this page of 137 — 10 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-13 14:28 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jaworski1978@adres.pl> - 2025-08-13 21:16 +0200
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-13 15:40 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jaworski1978@adres.pl> - 2025-08-13 23:15 +0200
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-13 20:39 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jaworski1978@adres.pl> - 2025-08-13 23:34 +0200
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-13 20:46 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jaworski1978@adres.pl> - 2025-08-14 06:25 +0200
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-14 07:31 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-14 08:16 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-14 07:29 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-14 11:13 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-14 23:51 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-14 20:27 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-15 08:51 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 07:07 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-17 00:17 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-15 08:07 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-15 18:56 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-15 15:28 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 07:09 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-15 19:35 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-15 17:31 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-15 22:18 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-15 20:34 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 07:16 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-16 10:33 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 07:14 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 07:13 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-16 10:32 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-17 00:28 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 07:12 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-16 10:32 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-15 19:17 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-15 15:31 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-15 20:24 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-15 16:02 -0500
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-15 22:58 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-16 08:36 -0500
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-16 14:44 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-16 11:06 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-16 14:44 -0500
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-17 08:45 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-17 03:26 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-17 09:15 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-17 22:15 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 10:36 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-18 08:41 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-17 09:16 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-17 22:16 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 10:56 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-18 08:43 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-16 14:41 -0500
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-17 08:43 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-17 00:48 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-17 09:04 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 10:26 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-18 08:58 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-19 00:36 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 06:35 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-08-16 18:16 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-17 00:54 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 07:34 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-16 10:36 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-17 09:21 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-17 09:36 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-20 01:46 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 21:52 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-20 22:33 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-20 23:12 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 07:50 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-08-21 15:03 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-21 23:44 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-08-22 13:00 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-22 18:08 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 07:49 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-21 08:15 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-21 08:10 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-23 09:48 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-26 07:31 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-26 19:08 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-30 09:10 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-31 08:27 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-20 03:59 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 06:30 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-20 08:17 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-20 08:14 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-17 20:02 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-15 17:34 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-16 08:11 -0500
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 07:27 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 07:23 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-16 10:35 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-17 00:34 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-17 09:18 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-17 20:20 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 11:02 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-18 09:04 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-19 03:12 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 07:05 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-19 09:33 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 06:42 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 07:19 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-17 00:25 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-17 09:06 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-17 00:58 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-17 09:08 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-17 09:45 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-17 10:15 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-17 09:50 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-17 22:13 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 10:17 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-18 08:54 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 06:28 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-18 08:37 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 06:23 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-19 09:41 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 06:27 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 09:45 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 06:14 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-19 03:10 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 07:13 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-17 09:10 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-17 22:07 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 10:34 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-18 08:31 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-17 19:55 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-14 07:28 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-14 11:12 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-14 18:10 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-14 00:39 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-17 01:01 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-17 09:11 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-17 22:19 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-18 08:46 -0400
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-02 06:50 +0000
Re: BcacheFS Dev Might be Banned from Linux for Being Blunt & Rude CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-09-02 10:52 -0400
Page 7 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]
| From | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-19 03:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1080pvd$3ge1k$8@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #695115 |
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 06:14:55 -0400, Joel W. Crump wrote: > On 8/18/25 5:45 AM, RonB wrote: >> >> Murdering unborn babies is evil. > > Abortion rights protect women from harm, and cancel rape-babies. It’s well-known that banning abortions doesn’t reduce their occurrence. It just means they are no longer being done safely. But here’s the real question: if abortion is considered to be “murdering unborn babies”, then what about IVF? Shouldn’t that be banned as well, on the same grounds? Or is “life begins at conception” only applicable in a woman’s body, not in a Petri dish?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-19 07:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1081865$3io6f$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #695188 |
On 2025-08-19, Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: > On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 06:14:55 -0400, Joel W. Crump wrote: > >> On 8/18/25 5:45 AM, RonB wrote: >>> >>> Murdering unborn babies is evil. >> >> Abortion rights protect women from harm, and cancel rape-babies. > > It’s well-known that banning abortions doesn’t reduce their occurrence. It > just means they are no longer being done safely. It's widely reported, but it's not factual or "well known" or true. And it doesn't change the fact that abortion kills innocent living human babies. > But here’s the real question: if abortion is considered to be “murdering > unborn babies”, then what about IVF? Shouldn’t that be banned as well, on > the same grounds? Or is “life begins at conception” only applicable in a > woman’s body, not in a Petri dish? It is banned in the Catholic Church. You should so some studying before lecturing us on these subjects. -- Definition of Insanity: Thinking you can beat the Bear on his own territory.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-17 09:10 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MwkoQ.162454$jNpf.137233@fx09.iad> |
| In reply to | #695013 |
On 2025-08-16 8:58 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > On Thu, 14 Aug 2025 11:13:14 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > >> To me, all muslims are shit ... > > But you need their oil, don’t you. No, we don't. We have more than enough _ethical_ oil in Alberta. If Venezuela can get rid of the asshole holding onto power there despite clearly being voted out, there would be another enormous source of oil nearby. Finally, if we can make peace with Russia and ensure that they behave, there is yet another source for oil. Impoverishing the muslims by refusing to buy their oil would be a smart policy. > Which means you have to be nice to > them. No. > Some Christian folk don’t understand any principle other than “money > talks” ... I understand that trying to work with people who conquered our lands, kidnapped our children to turn them into janissaries or sex slaves whether through war or coastal raids and constantly pushed into European borders with the intent of converting us by force is idiotic. Trading with these monsters is bad policy. Let them die by the sword they swung at us for over 1,400 years. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage Islam is the enemy John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-17 22:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <107tjr3$2kffr$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #695060 |
On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 09:10:01 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > On 2025-08-16 8:58 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: >> >> Some Christian folk don’t understand any principle other than “money >> talks” ... > > I understand that trying to work with people who conquered our lands ... You conquered theirs, remember. Think about why, to this day, “Crusade” remains a bad word in the Middle East.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-18 10:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <107uvjp$2vqpe$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #695098 |
On 2025-08-17, Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: > On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 09:10:01 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > >> On 2025-08-16 8:58 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: >>> >>> Some Christian folk don’t understand any principle other than “money >>> talks” ... >> >> I understand that trying to work with people who conquered our lands ... > > You conquered theirs, remember. Think about why, to this day, “Crusade” > remains a bad word in the Middle East. "Theirs" (so-called) was originally Christian lands. Islam is a Christian heresy. It came AFTER Christianity. And when it came it enslaved Christians demanding ransom from families who were forced to buy their family members back from slavery. This is what the Crusaders tried to stop. (Unfortunately there was too much infighting among the Europeans.) You're grasp of history seems to be as skewed and myopic as your grasp of the Bible. Another self-loathing white liberal, it appears. -- Definition of Insanity: Thinking you can beat the Bear on his own territory.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-18 08:31 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <43FoQ.111708$CQJe.93633@fx14.iad> |
| In reply to | #695098 |
On 2025-08-17 6:07 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 09:10:01 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > >> On 2025-08-16 8:58 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: >>> >>> Some Christian folk don’t understand any principle other than “money >>> talks” ... >> >> I understand that trying to work with people who conquered our lands ... > > You conquered theirs, remember. Think about why, to this day, “Crusade” > remains a bad word in the Middle East. The Crusades were defensive wars that followed centuries of muslim conquests. The sand niggers will tell you that they were peaceful and that we Christians were the oppressors, but they also consider the wars they fought to conquer the lands around them to be defensive too. There is no mention of how anyone attacked or threatened them, but they call them defensive anyway. I imagine the sand niggers raping women in the West also call those assaults defensive. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage Islam is the enemy John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-17 19:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mgeqefF32aU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #695013 |
On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 00:58:00 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > On Thu, 14 Aug 2025 11:13:14 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > >> To me, all muslims are shit ... > > But you need their oil, don’t you. Which means you have to be nice to > them. Not really. We need their CHEAP oil.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-14 07:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <107k36b$bk35$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #694728 |
On 2025-08-13, 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jaworski1978@adres.pl> wrote: > W dniu 13.08.2025 o 21:40, CrudeSausage pisze: >> Nevertheless, I repeat that islam is the enemy. > > I don't agree. The reason is that, "fish is rotten from head". This > mean, that in most cases I blame the governments, and not specific > people. Normal people wants the same in every place they live: "live in > love and peace". But governments wants something opposite "rule World > for ever, for all costs". The governments are insane greedy - I don't > hear about government without credits. That greedy lead governments to > establish "secret police". Probably when you say "these monsters" you > mean "secret police agents". But as I say - they are not normal people - > they are agents. Isn't it the "normal" Muslims who are raping children and women in European countries? Or are all these migrants the leaders of Muslim countries? Crime in Sweden was almost unknown until the Muslim migrants arrived. -- Definition of Insanity: Thinking you can beat the Bear on his own territory.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-14 11:12 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <B1nnQ.104522$Fhs6.35206@fx17.iad> |
| In reply to | #694755 |
On 2025-08-14 3:28 a.m., RonB wrote: > On 2025-08-13, 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jaworski1978@adres.pl> wrote: >> W dniu 13.08.2025 o 21:40, CrudeSausage pisze: >>> Nevertheless, I repeat that islam is the enemy. >> >> I don't agree. The reason is that, "fish is rotten from head". This >> mean, that in most cases I blame the governments, and not specific >> people. Normal people wants the same in every place they live: "live in >> love and peace". But governments wants something opposite "rule World >> for ever, for all costs". The governments are insane greedy - I don't >> hear about government without credits. That greedy lead governments to >> establish "secret police". Probably when you say "these monsters" you >> mean "secret police agents". But as I say - they are not normal people - >> they are agents. > > Isn't it the "normal" Muslims who are raping children and women in European > countries? Or are all these migrants the leaders of Muslim countries? Crime > in Sweden was almost unknown until the Muslim migrants arrived. And no one can deny that the muslims are behind it. They have also taken over parts of the country and turned them into ghettos where police can't do their job. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage Islam is the enemy John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-14 18:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mg6n44Fjo2rU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #694755 |
On Thu, 14 Aug 2025 07:28:11 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote: > On 2025-08-13, 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jaworski1978@adres.pl> wrote: >> W dniu 13.08.2025 o 21:40, CrudeSausage pisze: >>> Nevertheless, I repeat that islam is the enemy. >> >> I don't agree. The reason is that, "fish is rotten from head". This >> mean, that in most cases I blame the governments, and not specific >> people. Normal people wants the same in every place they live: "live in >> love and peace". But governments wants something opposite "rule World >> for ever, for all costs". The governments are insane greedy - I don't >> hear about government without credits. That greedy lead governments to >> establish "secret police". Probably when you say "these monsters" you >> mean "secret police agents". But as I say - they are not normal people >> - >> they are agents. > > Isn't it the "normal" Muslims who are raping children and women in > European countries? Or are all these migrants the leaders of Muslim > countries? Crime in Sweden was almost unknown until the Muslim migrants > arrived. They did have the eastern Europeans but that was more traditional crime than that introduced by the vibrant Moslem culture.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-14 00:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mg4pioF9n13U7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #694705 |
On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 21:16:45 +0200, 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 wrote: > W dniu 13.08.2025 o 20:28, CrudeSausage pisze: >> Islam is the enemy John 14:6 > > Did you know that Pope say the same about Jude?!? That was for many > centuries. > Did you know that Pope and some kings made 9 crusades against Muslims in > Palestine, but Pope with Deutschland made nearly 50 crusades against > Poland? > Did you know that you wrongly call Deutschland as Germany? Did you know > that true Germans were part of Slavic federation under Polish hegemony? > The same is true about Praust (for many years they were part of Slavic > federation under Polish hegemony) and was nothing related with Prussia > Kingdom. Simply because Praust was entirely annihilated by Deutschland. The Northern Crusades happened after fighting Muslims dropped out of favor. Poland would probably be Orthodox rather than Catholic without them. They lost momentum after the Battle on the Ice. Nevsky is still a hero in Russia today.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-17 01:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <107r9lt$20k71$11@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #694697 |
On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 14:28:21 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > ... Linux development nowadays can't handle the truth. > > <https://lunduke.substack.com/p/bcachefs-dev-might-be-banned-from> No doubt there is no shortage of suitably right-wing-subscribing developers ready to step forward and fill the breach. You could fork the entire Linux kernel, and name it “Lundix”, after your favourite Thought Leader. Go over the code line by line, purging any that you cannot guarantee was produced by 100% heterosexual, binary-gendered hands.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-17 09:11 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <fykoQ.162455$jNpf.69372@fx09.iad> |
| In reply to | #695014 |
On 2025-08-16 9:01 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 14:28:21 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > >> ... Linux development nowadays can't handle the truth. >> >> <https://lunduke.substack.com/p/bcachefs-dev-might-be-banned-from> > > No doubt there is no shortage of suitably right-wing-subscribing > developers ready to step forward and fill the breach. > > You could fork the entire Linux kernel, and name it “Lundix”, after your > favourite Thought Leader. Go over the code line by line, purging any that > you cannot guarantee was produced by 100% heterosexual, binary-gendered > hands. I prefer to stick to an operating system that I know works well and sit this one out. Inevitably, the Marxists and homosexuals who took over Linux development will eat one another before long, once it becomes clear that truly productive developers have no more interest in doing any of the work. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage Islam is the enemy John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-17 22:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <107tki1$2kffr$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #695062 |
On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 09:11:38 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > On 2025-08-16 9:01 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > >> On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 14:28:21 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >> >>> ... Linux development nowadays can't handle the truth. >>> >>> <https://lunduke.substack.com/p/bcachefs-dev-might-be-banned-from> >> >> No doubt there is no shortage of suitably right-wing-subscribing >> developers ready to step forward and fill the breach. >> >> You could fork the entire Linux kernel, and name it “Lundix”, after >> your favourite Thought Leader. Go over the code line by line, purging >> any that you cannot guarantee was produced by 100% heterosexual, >> binary-gendered hands. > > I prefer to stick to an operating system that I know works well and sit > this one out. Pragmatism wins out over ideaology, eh? That attitude won’t go down well with the current regime in power in Dumbfuckistan, that’s for sure. > Inevitably, the Marxists and homosexuals who took over > Linux development will eat one another before long, once it becomes > clear that truly productive developers have no more interest in doing > any of the work. It does seem to be going the other way, doesn’t it? Judging from how you try to keep infesting these newsgroups with more and more examples of your ideological cant. So where are the right-wing-subscribing developers with the knowledge and skills to do the work? Because the right-wingers seem to be more and more preoccupied with “culture wars”, instead of doing useful work. They are the ones eating themselves.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-18 08:46 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <JgFoQ.42052$fpLb.38025@fx44.iad> |
| In reply to | #695102 |
On 2025-08-17 6:19 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 09:11:38 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > >> On 2025-08-16 9:01 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 14:28:21 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >>> >>>> ... Linux development nowadays can't handle the truth. >>>> >>>> <https://lunduke.substack.com/p/bcachefs-dev-might-be-banned-from> >>> >>> No doubt there is no shortage of suitably right-wing-subscribing >>> developers ready to step forward and fill the breach. >>> >>> You could fork the entire Linux kernel, and name it “Lundix”, after >>> your favourite Thought Leader. Go over the code line by line, purging >>> any that you cannot guarantee was produced by 100% heterosexual, >>> binary-gendered hands. >> >> I prefer to stick to an operating system that I know works well and sit >> this one out. > > Pragmatism wins out over ideaology, eh? Ideology. While I believe in software freedom, I am strongly against Communism. If the people developing free software subscribe to the latter, then I have no interest in using it. > That attitude won’t go down well > with the current regime in power in Dumbfuckistan, that’s for sure. Is Dumbfuckistan where you live? Are you and Larry Pietraskiewicz the only citizens there? >> Inevitably, the Marxists and homosexuals who took over >> Linux development will eat one another before long, once it becomes >> clear that truly productive developers have no more interest in doing >> any of the work. > > It does seem to be going the other way, doesn’t it? Judging from how you > try to keep infesting these newsgroups with more and more examples of your > ideological cant. So where are the right-wing-subscribing developers with > the knowledge and skills to do the work? Because the right-wingers seem to > be more and more preoccupied with “culture wars”, instead of doing useful > work. They are the ones eating themselves. The right-wing developers are employed at top dollar producing software for big companies that make profits. They live in big houses with their large families. They don't feel like sacrificing that to please some freeloaders who subscribe to Communsim. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage Islam is the enemy John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-09-02 06:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <109642t$bco7$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #695133 |
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 08:46:30 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > On 2025-08-17 6:19 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: >> >> On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 09:11:38 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >> >>> On 2025-08-16 9:01 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 14:28:21 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>> >>>>> ... Linux development nowadays can't handle the truth. >>>>> >>>>> <https://lunduke.substack.com/p/bcachefs-dev-might-be-banned-from> >>>> >>>> No doubt there is no shortage of suitably right-wing-subscribing >>>> developers ready to step forward and fill the breach. >>>> >>>> You could fork the entire Linux kernel, and name it “Lundix”, >>>> after your favourite Thought Leader. Go over the code line by >>>> line, purging any that you cannot guarantee was produced by 100% >>>> heterosexual, binary-gendered hands. >>> >>> I prefer to stick to an operating system that I know works well >>> and sit this one out. >> >> Pragmatism wins out over ideaology, eh? > > Ideology. While I believe in software freedom, I am strongly against > Communism. If the people developing free software subscribe to the > latter, then I have no interest in using it. Then why are you still here? >>> Inevitably, the Marxists and homosexuals who took over Linux >>> development will eat one another before long, once it becomes >>> clear that truly productive developers have no more interest in >>> doing any of the work. >> >> It does seem to be going the other way, doesn’t it? Judging from >> how you try to keep infesting these newsgroups with more and more >> examples of your ideological cant. So where are the >> right-wing-subscribing developers with the knowledge and skills to >> do the work? Because the right-wingers seem to be more and more >> preoccupied with “culture wars”, instead of doing useful work. They >> are the ones eating themselves. > > The right-wing developers are employed at top dollar producing > software for big companies that make profits. They live in big > houses with their large families. They don't feel like sacrificing > that to please some freeloaders who subscribe to Communsim. Why are you not with them, then, basking in your success, and theirs? Why are you still here, continuing to try our patience with your vacuous and feckless moaning?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-09-02 10:52 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <qwDtQ.843863$6hp4.31785@fx17.iad> |
| In reply to | #696386 |
On 2025-09-02 2:50 a.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: >> Ideology. While I believe in software freedom, I am strongly against >> Communism. If the people developing free software subscribe to the >> latter, then I have no interest in using it. > > Then why are you still here? Because I like RonB and hope that the rest of you grow a pair to become like him one day. >> The right-wing developers are employed at top dollar producing >> software for big companies that make profits. They live in big >> houses with their large families. They don't feel like sacrificing >> that to please some freeloaders who subscribe to Communsim. > > Why are you not with them, then, basking in your success, and theirs? > Why are you still here, continuing to try our patience with your > vacuous and feckless moaning? I don't develop software. Never in my life have I been interested in producing a program of my own, even when I took programming classes. I do, however, believe in software freedom, even now that the developers of free software have been conquered by the homosexuals. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage Islam is the enemy John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web