Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #690105 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-05-08 19:18 +0000 |
| Last post | 2025-05-12 03:40 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 46 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
GNU/Linux System Clock Drift Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-05-08 19:18 +0000
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-05-09 19:50 +0000
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-05-09 15:56 -0400
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-05-09 21:19 +0000
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-05-09 17:25 -0400
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-10 03:23 +0000
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-05-10 10:25 +0000
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-10 19:51 +0000
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-05-10 21:55 +0000
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-05-11 19:00 +0000
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-05-10 10:59 +0000
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-05-10 07:03 -0400
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-05-10 12:58 +0000
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-05-10 13:29 +0000
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-05-10 10:26 -0400
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-05-10 16:09 +0000
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-05-10 21:40 +0000
Re: Farley Fucktard brags about setting his clock (was: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift) Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-05-11 14:51 +0000
Re: Farley Fucktard brags about setting his clock (was: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift) Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> - 2025-05-11 15:40 +0000
Re: Farley Fucktard brags about setting his clock (was: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 15:02 -0400
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-12 01:26 +0000
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-05-16 20:32 +0000
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-05-16 13:41 -0700
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> - 2025-05-11 07:02 -0400
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 08:01 -0400
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> - 2025-05-11 09:24 -0400
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 15:01 -0400
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> - 2025-05-11 16:14 -0400
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 16:21 -0400
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> - 2025-05-12 03:39 -0400
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 03:45 -0400
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> - 2025-05-12 04:14 -0400
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 04:26 -0400
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> - 2025-05-12 09:27 -0400
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-05-12 10:26 +0000
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> - 2025-05-12 09:28 -0400
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-05-12 14:05 +0000
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> - 2025-05-12 10:27 -0400
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-05-12 14:51 +0000
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift Scott Doty <doty@dooty.net> - 2025-05-12 11:00 -0400
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> - 2025-05-12 12:01 -0400
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> - 2025-05-12 11:03 -0400
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-12 20:30 -0400
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-05-11 20:28 -0400
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 20:32 -0400
Re: GNU/Linux System Clock Drift Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> - 2025-05-12 03:40 -0400
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
| From | Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-12 01:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vvrioj$npn4$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #690145 |
On 10 May 2025 16:09:58 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: > Now, the solution is to check for an atomic clock who doesn't drift > because at the same time it's more precise and there are more than one > clock, so they can average the drift and stay stable. Every clock drifts. It’s just that an atomic clock drifts less than a quartz one. You can reduce the random error by averaging over multiple clocks. For example, if you have 10 clocks, all with the same random error rate, then by averaging their readings, you can achieve greater accuracy by a factor of √10 ≅ 3.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-16 20:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <6827a0e0$0$433$426a74cc@news.free.fr> |
| In reply to | #690180 |
Le 12-05-2025, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> a écrit : > On 10 May 2025 16:09:58 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: > >> Now, the solution is to check for an atomic clock who doesn't drift >> because at the same time it's more precise and there are more than one >> clock, so they can average the drift and stay stable. > > Every clock drifts. It’s just that an atomic clock drifts less than a > quartz one. Yes. I should have said more precisely, that the ntp doesn't check about one atomic cloak hardware but to the atomic clock system, which is more precise. > You can reduce the random error by averaging over multiple clocks. For > example, if you have 10 clocks, all with the same random error rate, then > by averaging their readings, you can achieve greater accuracy by a factor > of √10 ≅ 3. Agreed, but it's so precise, I will never been able to see the drift during my life. In practice, I can consider it doesn't drift. -- Si vous avez du temps à perdre : https://scarpet42.gitlab.io
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <pursent100@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-16 13:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fsidnSiFQI9tP7r1nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #690309 |
Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: > Le 12-05-2025, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> a écrit : >> On 10 May 2025 16:09:58 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: >> >>> Now, the solution is to check for an atomic clock who doesn't drift >>> because at the same time it's more precise and there are more than one >>> clock, so they can average the drift and stay stable. >> >> Every clock drifts. It’s just that an atomic clock drifts less than a >> quartz one. > > Yes. I should have said more precisely, that the ntp doesn't check about > one atomic cloak hardware but to the atomic clock system, which is more > precise. > >> You can reduce the random error by averaging over multiple clocks. For >> example, if you have 10 clocks, all with the same random error rate, then >> by averaging their readings, you can achieve greater accuracy by a factor >> of √10 ≅ 3. > > Agreed, but it's so precise, I will never been able to see the drift > during my life. In practice, I can consider it doesn't drift. > i could drift you if you like
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-11 07:02 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <183e7418c9553300$229185$735129$6cdd666a@news.thecubenet.com> |
| In reply to | #690142 |
Joel wrote: > Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote: >> On 10 May 2025 12:58:18 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: >> >>>> Yes it does. All PCs will drift. >>> >>> Nonononono. You precisely said you were speaking about systems and not >>> about hardware. >> >> Yesyesyesyesyes. >> >> The implication, as any INTELLIGENT person would discern, is that >> any PC that is running GNU/Linux will drift in both the hardware >> clock and the system clock. >> >> The original question was: "How much drift?" >> >> But you cannot answer because you don't control your own system. >> Your distro does all the work. You are just a helpless observer. >> >> I should also ask: "Does the clock correction include leap seconds?" >> >> Again, you cannot answer. You could not ever know if your system time >> includes leap seconds or not. >> >> You are BLIND and HELPLESS. Your distro is your guide dog: >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guide_dog > > > Get a fucking life, sheesh. > > Get a fucking job, you lazy wankstain.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-11 08:01 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <vc412kda8vmhcc3sfc2ldihmqm1m16uiic@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #690161 |
Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote: >Get a fucking job, you lazy wankstain. I work very hard, dumbshit. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-11 09:24 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <183e7bdd1883d33a$160963$5831$66dd6c6a@news.thecubenet.com> |
| In reply to | #690163 |
Joel wrote: > Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote: > >> Get a fucking job, you lazy wankstain. > > > I work very hard, dumbshit. > > You collect welfare you fucking mooch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-11 15:01 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <uvs12kl5ursq5tka8huirodn5emr7732dm@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #690164 |
Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote: >>> Get a fucking job, you lazy wankstain. >> >> I work very hard, dumbshit. >> >You collect welfare you fucking mooch. It's not welfare, you fucking moron, it's earned, I earned the SSDI when I worked, my parents earned the rest. Fuck you. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-11 16:14 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <183e923ac58bd6d0$161926$5831$66dd6c6a@news.thecubenet.com> |
| In reply to | #690168 |
Joel wrote: > Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote: > >>>> Get a fucking job, you lazy wankstain. >>> >>> I work very hard, dumbshit. >>> >> You collect welfare you fucking mooch. > > > It's not welfare, you fucking moron, it's earned, I earned the SSDI > when I worked, my parents earned the rest. Fuck you. > > You're a mooch on society you lazy pillow biter.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-11 16:21 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <9i122kl5tj6gf4djgqgtk2becs279f7743@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #690172 |
Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote: >>>>> Get a fucking job, you lazy wankstain. >>>> >>>> I work very hard, dumbshit. >>>> >>> You collect welfare you fucking mooch. >> >> It's not welfare, you fucking moron, it's earned, I earned the SSDI >> when I worked, my parents earned the rest. Fuck you. >> >You're a mooch on society you lazy pillow biter. No, I'm not. I'm doing what I'm supposed to be doing. You are just a fucking dumbshit cracker running Win8 without even the 8.1 update, you're a doofus. You're nothing. I'm on the front lines of what's happening in the world, you're trolling Usenet in 2025 like a goofball. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-12 03:39 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <183eb7938a0f5fd2$48624$15763$24dd2e6e@news.thecubenet.com> |
| In reply to | #690173 |
Joel wrote: > Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote: > >>>>>> Get a fucking job, you lazy wankstain. >>>>> >>>>> I work very hard, dumbshit. >>>>> >>>> You collect welfare you fucking mooch. >>> >>> It's not welfare, you fucking moron, it's earned, I earned the SSDI >>> when I worked, my parents earned the rest. Fuck you. >>> >> You're a mooch on society you lazy pillow biter. > > > No, I'm not. I'm doing what I'm supposed to be doing. You are just a > fucking dumbshit cracker running Win8 without even the 8.1 update, > you're a doofus. You're nothing. I'm on the front lines of what's > happening in the world, you're trolling Usenet in 2025 like a > goofball. > > You're not only a lazy mooch on society you're also clueless since I'm on Windows 10, not 8. And even if you were right it wouldn't change the fact that you sit on your lazy ass mooching instead of getting a job.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-12 03:45 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <2j932k5638qdhkrl3h8d8q45so384ots54@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #690181 |
Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote: >User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20 >> >You're not only a lazy mooch on society you're also >clueless since I'm on Windows 10, not 8. And even if >you were right it wouldn't change the fact that you >sit on your lazy ass mooching instead of getting a >job. Why does your header say you're running Win8 if you aren't? Are you trying to hide something? I'm being very real about who and what I am, what I use, you're claiming I'm ASSuming yet it's right fucking there, your info says you're running Win8. Why? -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-12 04:14 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <183eb98280bdbe81$93449$2706$26dd2c6e@news.thecubenet.com> |
| In reply to | #690183 |
Joel wrote: Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote: > >> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20 >>> >> You're not only a lazy mooch on society you're also >> clueless since I'm on Windows 10, not 8. And even if >> you were right it wouldn't change the fact that you >> sit on your lazy ass mooching instead of getting a >> job. > > > Why does your header say you're running Win8 if you aren't?> > Here's my OS capture after running the winver command: https://postimg.cc/GHRLSbkV Now, stop changing the topic from you being a lazy SSI collecting mooch on society, you clueless wanker.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-12 04:26 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <vtb32k9s60pfkj3kbsobc5un3b6n8djn6d@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #690184 |
Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote: > > Why does your header say you're running Win8 if you aren't?> > > >Here's my OS capture after running the winver command: > >https://postimg.cc/GHRLSbkV If you say so. >Now, stop changing the topic from you being >a lazy SSI collecting mooch on society, you >clueless wanker. I *DON'T* get SSI, I make too much *earned* income for that, because of my parents. You are an ignoramus of the system. You just spew these canned "welfare" phrases, not knowing *anything* about how this works. You're a fucking moron. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-12 09:27 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <183eca992dad4b6f$89331$647894$2add206e@news.thecubenet.com> |
| In reply to | #690185 |
Joel wrote: > Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote: > >>> Why does your header say you're running Win8 if you aren't?> >>> >> Here's my OS capture after running the winver command: >> >> https://postimg.cc/GHRLSbkV > > > If you say so. > > >> Now, stop changing the topic from you being >> a lazy SSI collecting mooch on society, you >> clueless wanker. > > > I *DON'T* get SSI, I make too much *earned* income for that, because > of my parents. > > You've admitted to mooching off the government dole, so what's your supposed disability, a mental one, you lazy wankstain?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-12 10:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m8e0muFpt6iU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #690184 |
On Mon, 12 May 2025 04:14:35 -0400, Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote in <183eb98280bdbe81$93449$2706$26dd2c6e@news.thecubenet.com>: > Joel wrote: > Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote: > > > >> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:128.0) > Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20 > >>> > >> You're not only a lazy mooch on society you're also clueless since > >> I'm on Windows 10, not 8. And even if you were right it wouldn't > >> change the fact that you sit on your lazy ass mooching instead of > >> getting a job. > > > > > > Why does your header say you're running Win8 if you aren't?> > > > Here's my OS capture after running the winver command: > > https://postimg.cc/GHRLSbkV Better get off the stick and upgrade before your OS goes EOL. BTW: Win11 isn't an upgrade, you're going to want to go with Linux. (You know you do.) -- -v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti OS: Linux 6.14.6 Release: Mint 22.1 Mem: 258G "Linux, the choice of a GNU generation."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-12 09:28 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <183ecaa465e86492$85888$647894$2add206e@news.thecubenet.com> |
| In reply to | #690187 |
vallor wrote: > On Mon, 12 May 2025 04:14:35 -0400, Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote in > <183eb98280bdbe81$93449$2706$26dd2c6e@news.thecubenet.com>: > >> Joel wrote: >> Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote: >> > >> >> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:128.0) >> Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20 >> >>> >> >> You're not only a lazy mooch on society you're also clueless since >> >> I'm on Windows 10, not 8. And even if you were right it wouldn't >> >> change the fact that you sit on your lazy ass mooching instead of >> >> getting a job. >> > >> > >> > Why does your header say you're running Win8 if you aren't?> >> > >> Here's my OS capture after running the winver command: >> >> https://postimg.cc/GHRLSbkV > > Better get off the stick and upgrade before your OS goes EOL. > > BTW: Win11 isn't an upgrade, you're going to want to go with > Linux. (You know you do.) > > Better fuck off, asshat.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-12 14:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m8edhfFrh2oU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #690191 |
On Mon, 12 May 2025 09:28:33 -0400, Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote in <183ecaa465e86492$85888$647894$2add206e@news.thecubenet.com>: > vallor wrote: >> On Mon, 12 May 2025 04:14:35 -0400, Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote >> in <183eb98280bdbe81$93449$2706$26dd2c6e@news.thecubenet.com>: >> >>> Joel wrote: >>> Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote: >>> > >>> >> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:128.0) >>> Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20 >>> >>> >>> >> You're not only a lazy mooch on society you're also clueless >>> >> since I'm on Windows 10, not 8. And even if you were right it >>> >> wouldn't change the fact that you sit on your lazy ass mooching >>> >> instead of getting a job. >>> > >>> > >>> > Why does your header say you're running Win8 if you aren't?> >>> > >>> Here's my OS capture after running the winver command: >>> >>> https://postimg.cc/GHRLSbkV >> >> Better get off the stick and upgrade before your OS goes EOL. >> >> BTW: Win11 isn't an upgrade, you're going to want to go with Linux. >> (You know you do.) >> >> > Better fuck off, asshat. Is that the best you can do? You know you want to run Linux like all the cool kids do. Failing to even try it only shows the weakness of your technical prowess...such as it is. -- -v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti OS: Linux 6.14.6 Release: Mint 22.1 Mem: 258G "Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room!"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-12 10:27 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <183ecdd5c410e8c8$51003$4491$6add606a@news.thecubenet.com> |
| In reply to | #690192 |
vallor wrote: > On Mon, 12 May 2025 09:28:33 -0400, Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote in > <183ecaa465e86492$85888$647894$2add206e@news.thecubenet.com>: > >> vallor wrote: >>> On Mon, 12 May 2025 04:14:35 -0400, Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote >>> in <183eb98280bdbe81$93449$2706$26dd2c6e@news.thecubenet.com>: >>> >>>> Joel wrote: >>>> Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:128.0) >>>> Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20 >>>> >>> >>>> >> You're not only a lazy mooch on society you're also clueless >>>> >> since I'm on Windows 10, not 8. And even if you were right it >>>> >> wouldn't change the fact that you sit on your lazy ass mooching >>>> >> instead of getting a job. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Why does your header say you're running Win8 if you aren't?> >>>> > >>>> Here's my OS capture after running the winver command: >>>> >>>> https://postimg.cc/GHRLSbkV >>> >>> Better get off the stick and upgrade before your OS goes EOL. >>> >>> BTW: Win11 isn't an upgrade, you're going to want to go with Linux. >>> (You know you do.) >>> >>> >> Better fuck off, asshat. > > Is that the best you can do? > > You know you want to run Linux like all the cool kids do. > > You mean like that pillow biting Joel queer, *you* may consider that lazy SSI mooching poofter cool but I certainly don't.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-12 14:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m8eg7bFrh2oU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #690195 |
On Mon, 12 May 2025 10:27:04 -0400, Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote in <183ecdd5c410e8c8$51003$4491$6add606a@news.thecubenet.com>: > vallor wrote: >> On Mon, 12 May 2025 09:28:33 -0400, Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote >> in <183ecaa465e86492$85888$647894$2add206e@news.thecubenet.com>: >> >>> vallor wrote: >>>> On Mon, 12 May 2025 04:14:35 -0400, Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> >>>> wrote in <183eb98280bdbe81$93449$2706$26dd2c6e@news.thecubenet.com>: >>>> >>>>> Joel wrote: >>>>> Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> >> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:128.0) >>>>> Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20 >>>>> >>> >>>>> >> You're not only a lazy mooch on society you're also clueless >>>>> >> since I'm on Windows 10, not 8. And even if you were right it >>>>> >> wouldn't change the fact that you sit on your lazy ass >>>>> >> mooching instead of getting a job. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Why does your header say you're running Win8 if you aren't?> >>>>> > >>>>> Here's my OS capture after running the winver command: >>>>> >>>>> https://postimg.cc/GHRLSbkV >>>> >>>> Better get off the stick and upgrade before your OS goes EOL. >>>> >>>> BTW: Win11 isn't an upgrade, you're going to want to go with Linux. >>>> (You know you do.) >>>> >>>> >>> Better fuck off, asshat. >> >> Is that the best you can do? >> >> You know you want to run Linux like all the cool kids do. >> >> > You mean like that pillow biting Joel queer, *you* may consider that > lazy SSI mooching poofter cool but I certainly don't. You left out the part of my post that read: ] Failing to even try it only shows the weakness of your technical ] prowess...such as it is. Because you're _scared_, aren't you? Huh? Right? Big tough keyboard warrior won't even boot a Mint stick. Bwahahaha. -- -v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti OS: Linux 6.14.6 Release: Mint 22.1 Mem: 258G "Does killing time damage eternity?"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Scott Doty <doty@dooty.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-12 11:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.428bd725991e6fc99898cb@news.usenetexpress.com> |
| In reply to | #690198 |
In article <m8eg7bFrh2oU3@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org says... > > On Mon, 12 May 2025 10:27:04 -0400, Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote in > <183ecdd5c410e8c8$51003$4491$6add606a@news.thecubenet.com>: > > > vallor wrote: > >> On Mon, 12 May 2025 09:28:33 -0400, Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote > >> in <183ecaa465e86492$85888$647894$2add206e@news.thecubenet.com>: > >> > >>> vallor wrote: > >>>> On Mon, 12 May 2025 04:14:35 -0400, Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> > >>>> wrote in <183eb98280bdbe81$93449$2706$26dd2c6e@news.thecubenet.com>: > >>>> > >>>>> Joel wrote: > >>>>> Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote: > >>>>> > > >>>>> >> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:128.0) > >>>>> Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20 > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >> You're not only a lazy mooch on society you're also clueless > >>>>> >> since I'm on Windows 10, not 8. And even if you were right it > >>>>> >> wouldn't change the fact that you sit on your lazy ass > >>>>> >> mooching instead of getting a job. > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Why does your header say you're running Win8 if you aren't?> > >>>>> > > >>>>> Here's my OS capture after running the winver command: > >>>>> > >>>>> https://postimg.cc/GHRLSbkV > >>>> > >>>> Better get off the stick and upgrade before your OS goes EOL. > >>>> > >>>> BTW: Win11 isn't an upgrade, you're going to want to go with Linux. > >>>> (You know you do.) > >>>> > >>>> > >>> Better fuck off, asshat. > >> > >> Is that the best you can do? > >> > >> You know you want to run Linux like all the cool kids do. > >> > >> > > You mean like that pillow biting Joel queer, *you* may consider that > > lazy SSI mooching poofter cool but I certainly don't. > > You left out the part of my post that read: > > ] Failing to even try it only shows the weakness of your technical > ] prowess...such as it is. > > Because you're _scared_, aren't you? Huh? Right? > > Big tough keyboard warrior won't even boot a Mint stick. Bwahahaha. > > I've been using that new mint flavored contraceptive taken before sex, it's called predickamints.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web