Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #687302 > unrolled thread
| Started by | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-03-10 15:17 -0400 |
| Last post | 2025-03-24 08:03 -0600 |
| Articles | 10 on this page of 50 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-10 15:17 -0400
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children Hank Rogers <Hank@nospam.invalid> - 2025-03-10 16:52 -0500
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-10 20:07 -0400
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children Hank Rogers <Hank@nospam.invalid> - 2025-03-10 19:27 -0500
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 21:00 -0400
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-10 21:18 -0400
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-03-11 07:45 -0500
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-11 08:53 -0400
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-03-23 14:50 +0000
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-24 08:48 -0400
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-03-24 17:20 +0000
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-24 14:19 -0400
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 20:59 -0400
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-11 01:00 +0000
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-10 21:19 -0400
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children Philip Herlihy <nothing@invalid.com> - 2025-03-11 11:36 +0000
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> - 2025-03-11 12:39 +0000
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children Dr No <noreply@noreply.com> - 2025-03-11 16:47 +0000
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-11 13:15 -0400
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-03-13 05:56 +0000
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-13 08:45 -0400
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 06:30 +0000
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-14 08:40 -0400
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 17:10 +0000
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-14 13:55 -0400
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 11:08 -0700
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-03-15 06:34 +0000
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-03-15 06:42 +0000
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-15 08:27 -0400
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-03-15 20:06 +0000
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-15 20:39 -0400
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-03-16 05:27 +0000
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-03-16 07:41 +0000
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-16 08:53 -0400
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-15 08:26 -0400
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-03-15 20:05 +0000
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-15 20:38 -0400
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-03-16 08:35 -0500
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-16 10:08 -0400
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-03-16 05:39 +0000
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-03-16 07:46 +0000
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-16 08:55 -0400
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-03-16 05:38 +0000
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-03-16 07:52 +0000
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-16 09:02 -0400
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-03-17 07:16 +0000
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-17 08:46 -0400
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-03-17 20:39 +0000
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-03-12 00:45 -0400
Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children focoloco@proton.me - 2025-03-24 08:03 -0600
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-16 07:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m3ndu5F4am8U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #687527 |
On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 05:39:44 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote: > What is it with Woke morons that they all want to be control freaks? TBH it isn't always the woke. Ever been in a dry county or state? To be consistent I have no problem with Mule Ass County declaring itself dry or Minnesota deciding it wants to use sharia law. I have a real problem with the Federal government making blanket laws for the states.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-16 08:55 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <eTzBP.571664$OrR5.177124@fx18.iad> |
| In reply to | #687527 |
On 2025-03-16 1:39 a.m., RonB wrote: > On 2025-03-15, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: >> On Sat, 15 Mar 2025 08:26:46 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >> >>> The movement still exists, and I would bet that if Trump made a decent >>> offer to Alberta for it to become a state, they would at least vote on >>> it. Alberta generally gets no benefit from being within Canada, mostly >>> because of how resistant Quebec ecologists are to Alberta's main export: >>> oil. America wouldn't prevent the province from enriching itself. >> >> I have a campaign button from the Reform Party of Alberta that says "It's >> Your Country, Not Theirs". That was the Reform Party of the '90s, not the >> current one. >> >> Ottawa did quite a bit to piss off Alberta on really important issues. >> Calgary Export at the time was a local beer. Their blimp was inadvertently >> captured on TV as it floated over a ballgame. They were fined for >> advertising beer on TV. I think it was also Calgary Ex that used bottles >> shaped like little kegs and were told they had to conform to the Uniform >> Beer Bottle Act of 1989 or whatever the BS was. > > What is it with Woke morons that they all want to be control freaks? The woke community is usually made up of people who were bullied or rejected in high school for being weaker or uglier than the rest. They eventually figured out that by banding together, they would have the numbers and could force the world to obey them and accept every one of their stupid ideas. Instead of telling themselves that it was high school and that it is usually never a fun time for anyone, they have decided to make everyone pay. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-16 05:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnvtcouv.d0tu.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home> |
| In reply to | #687487 |
On 2025-03-15, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > On 2025-03-15 2:34 a.m., RonB wrote: >> On 2025-03-14, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>> On 3/14/25 13:10, RonB wrote: >>>> On 2025-03-14, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On 2025-03-13, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>> On 3/13/25 01:56, RonB wrote: >>>>>>> On 2025-03-11, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 3/11/25 12:47, Dr No wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 10/03/2025 19:17, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>>>>>>> <https://lunduke.substack.com/p/microsoft-still-promoting-and-funding> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Mandatory corporate insurance for "Gender Affirming Care" for children >>>>>>>>>> as young as 3 years old. Microsoft employees encouraged to administer >>>>>>>>>> puberty blockers quickly. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You can now send your children and get free sex change all paid for by >>>>>>>>> Microsoft. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Now go and fuck off, you Canadian bastard. 51st American state will get >>>>>>>>> a new governor by the name of Mark Carney who is not a politician, let >>>>>>>>> alone not an elected MP. How daft Canadians can be!! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I agree with that last part. The way the Liberals have mocked democratic >>>>>>>> values over the past decades is alarming. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It will be nice that Tradeua will be gone. (And Canada can quit being the >>>>>>> butt of the joke whenever their leader comes up). But Carney looks to be an >>>>>>> Epstein client. So, just another member of the Rothschild cabal replacing a >>>>>>> member of the Rosthschild cabal. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yep. In fact, Trudeau hand-picked Carney to be his successor and it >>>>>> looks like the leader vote a week ago was as fraudulent as the 2020 >>>>>> American election. 200,000 votes were disqualified and nobody from "The >>>>>> Party" can tell anyone why. Just trust them when they tell you that >>>>>> Carney got 85% or more of the vote. >>>>> >>>>> Sorry to hear that. In Romania the leading candidate can't even run. This >>>>> is called "democracy." >>>> >>>> On Carney from a Telegram Channel... >>>> >>>> Mark Carney: Trudeau’s Successor & Keeper of the Woke Purse Strings? >>>> >>>> Mark Carney’s biggest challenge won’t be fixing Canada’s crumbling >>>> economy, securing its borders, or even figuring out how to navigate U.S. >>>> tariffs under Trump 2.0. Nope. His real mission? Carrying the torch for >>>> Trudeau’s woke crusade, where “gender equality” isn’t about equal >>>> opportunity but rather a blank check for social engineering on a global >>>> scale—to the tune of $11 billion. >>>> >>>> 🔹 Trudeau’s Gender Agenda: Over the past decade, Canada burned through >>>> billions funding “overseas gender initiatives,” lining the pockets of >>>> international NGOs while Canadians faced soaring inflation, housing >>>> crises, and skyrocketing debt. >>>> >>>> 🔹 Carney’s Next Move? Will he double down on Trudeau’s obsession with >>>> “gender empowerment” abroad, or will he dare to reverse course and put >>>> Canadian taxpayers before woke vanity projects? >>>> >>>> 🔹 Follow the Money: The Liberals aren’t just about “gender equity.” >>>> They’re about ideological capture. Their “progressive” policies always >>>> seem to end up as grants for well-connected activists, think tanks, and >>>> UN-backed slush funds—while working-class Canadians struggle to make ends >>>> meet. >>>> >>>> Carney was hand-picked for a reason. Not to fix Trudeau’s wreckage, but >>>> to keep the same neoliberal-globalist agenda alive. >>>> >>>> The woke mind virus has already cost Canada dearly. Will Carney be the >>>> one to finally pull the plug, or will he just keep feeding the beast? >>>> >>>> 🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews >>>> >>>> Again, sorry. The Canadians need to clear out these Woke morons completely — >>>> probably would if they could have fair elections. >>>> >>> >>> At this point, I would actually love for Trump to go ahead with the >>> threat and take the country over. I have no faith whatsoever in our >>> people's ability to elect competent representatives. >> >> When I lived in Montana in the 70s, there was a movement for Western Canada >> to break away from Eastern Canada. Too bad they didn't do it. > > The movement still exists, and I would bet that if Trump made a decent > offer to Alberta for it to become a state, they would at least vote on > it. Alberta generally gets no benefit from being within Canada, mostly > because of how resistant Quebec ecologists are to Alberta's main export: > oil. America wouldn't prevent the province from enriching itself. I'm guessing Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba (maybe?). One of my favorite TV shows is Corner Gas, so Saskatchewan has to be included. I actually worked in Saskatchewan putting up grain elevators when I was a kid (late teens). Apparently they couldn't get any Canadians to work, they all got 40 hours of minimum wage on welfare (that's what we were told anyhow). (This was in the early 70s.) > Provinces Trump would definitely not want as part of the United States > are British Columbia (the cities are extremely woke even if the regions > are conservative), Ontario (their brand of conservatism resembles the > centre-left at best) and Quebec (there is no appeasing the French > Canadians). The others would probably benefit from being a part of the > United States. Yeah, I guess British Columbia is just continuation of the Left Coast, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Portland and Seattle. Some beautiful country in British Columbia, however (also in Washington, Oregon and California). -- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-16 07:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m3nea5F4am8U4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #687526 |
On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 05:38:27 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote: > I'm guessing Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba (maybe?). One of my > favorite TV shows is Corner Gas, so Saskatchewan has to be included. I > actually worked in Saskatchewan putting up grain elevators when I was a > kid (late teens). Apparently they couldn't get any Canadians to work, > they all got 40 hours of minimum wage on welfare (that's what we were > told anyhow). (This was in the early 70s.) WE set up molding equipment in both Ontario and Quebec in the '70s. If I brought in tools I would sometimes be asked to state I was not performing work that could be done by a Canadian. Like now the attitude of the customs people depended a lot on what sort of pissing contest the US and Canada were in. > Yeah, I guess British Columbia is just continuation of the Left Coast, > Los Angeles, San Francisco, Portland and Seattle. Some beautiful country > in British Columbia, however (also in Washington, Oregon and > California). I've been through Banff with a big truck and always wanted to go back with something that wasn't 65' long. My timing sucked. I got the passport card and was planning my trip when the covid scam shut the border down tighter than a squirrel's asshole. I'm not sure how the border is now.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-16 09:02 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <7_zBP.388592$gmf6.386236@fx45.iad> |
| In reply to | #687526 |
On 2025-03-16 1:38 a.m., RonB wrote: > On 2025-03-15, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >> On 2025-03-15 2:34 a.m., RonB wrote: >>> On 2025-03-14, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>> On 3/14/25 13:10, RonB wrote: >>>>> On 2025-03-14, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 2025-03-13, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>>> On 3/13/25 01:56, RonB wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2025-03-11, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 3/11/25 12:47, Dr No wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 10/03/2025 19:17, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> <https://lunduke.substack.com/p/microsoft-still-promoting-and-funding> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Mandatory corporate insurance for "Gender Affirming Care" for children >>>>>>>>>>> as young as 3 years old. Microsoft employees encouraged to administer >>>>>>>>>>> puberty blockers quickly. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You can now send your children and get free sex change all paid for by >>>>>>>>>> Microsoft. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Now go and fuck off, you Canadian bastard. 51st American state will get >>>>>>>>>> a new governor by the name of Mark Carney who is not a politician, let >>>>>>>>>> alone not an elected MP. How daft Canadians can be!! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I agree with that last part. The way the Liberals have mocked democratic >>>>>>>>> values over the past decades is alarming. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It will be nice that Tradeua will be gone. (And Canada can quit being the >>>>>>>> butt of the joke whenever their leader comes up). But Carney looks to be an >>>>>>>> Epstein client. So, just another member of the Rothschild cabal replacing a >>>>>>>> member of the Rosthschild cabal. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yep. In fact, Trudeau hand-picked Carney to be his successor and it >>>>>>> looks like the leader vote a week ago was as fraudulent as the 2020 >>>>>>> American election. 200,000 votes were disqualified and nobody from "The >>>>>>> Party" can tell anyone why. Just trust them when they tell you that >>>>>>> Carney got 85% or more of the vote. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sorry to hear that. In Romania the leading candidate can't even run. This >>>>>> is called "democracy." >>>>> >>>>> On Carney from a Telegram Channel... >>>>> >>>>> Mark Carney: Trudeau’s Successor & Keeper of the Woke Purse Strings? >>>>> >>>>> Mark Carney’s biggest challenge won’t be fixing Canada’s crumbling >>>>> economy, securing its borders, or even figuring out how to navigate U.S. >>>>> tariffs under Trump 2.0. Nope. His real mission? Carrying the torch for >>>>> Trudeau’s woke crusade, where “gender equality” isn’t about equal >>>>> opportunity but rather a blank check for social engineering on a global >>>>> scale—to the tune of $11 billion. >>>>> >>>>> 🔹 Trudeau’s Gender Agenda: Over the past decade, Canada burned through >>>>> billions funding “overseas gender initiatives,” lining the pockets of >>>>> international NGOs while Canadians faced soaring inflation, housing >>>>> crises, and skyrocketing debt. >>>>> >>>>> 🔹 Carney’s Next Move? Will he double down on Trudeau’s obsession with >>>>> “gender empowerment” abroad, or will he dare to reverse course and put >>>>> Canadian taxpayers before woke vanity projects? >>>>> >>>>> 🔹 Follow the Money: The Liberals aren’t just about “gender equity.” >>>>> They’re about ideological capture. Their “progressive” policies always >>>>> seem to end up as grants for well-connected activists, think tanks, and >>>>> UN-backed slush funds—while working-class Canadians struggle to make ends >>>>> meet. >>>>> >>>>> Carney was hand-picked for a reason. Not to fix Trudeau’s wreckage, but >>>>> to keep the same neoliberal-globalist agenda alive. >>>>> >>>>> The woke mind virus has already cost Canada dearly. Will Carney be the >>>>> one to finally pull the plug, or will he just keep feeding the beast? >>>>> >>>>> 🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews >>>>> >>>>> Again, sorry. The Canadians need to clear out these Woke morons completely — >>>>> probably would if they could have fair elections. >>>>> >>>> >>>> At this point, I would actually love for Trump to go ahead with the >>>> threat and take the country over. I have no faith whatsoever in our >>>> people's ability to elect competent representatives. >>> >>> When I lived in Montana in the 70s, there was a movement for Western Canada >>> to break away from Eastern Canada. Too bad they didn't do it. >> >> The movement still exists, and I would bet that if Trump made a decent >> offer to Alberta for it to become a state, they would at least vote on >> it. Alberta generally gets no benefit from being within Canada, mostly >> because of how resistant Quebec ecologists are to Alberta's main export: >> oil. America wouldn't prevent the province from enriching itself. > > I'm guessing Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba (maybe?). One of my favorite > TV shows is Corner Gas, so Saskatchewan has to be included. I actually > worked in Saskatchewan putting up grain elevators when I was a kid (late > teens). Apparently they couldn't get any Canadians to work, they all got 40 > hours of minimum wage on welfare (that's what we were told anyhow). (This > was in the early 70s.) This is why I don't believe the welfare system should even exist. If you want to survive, work. If you don't want to, you are free to become a burden to your family for as long as they can tolerate your parasitic behaviour. The welfare system does little more than make able-bodied people lazy and attract third-world parasites. >> Provinces Trump would definitely not want as part of the United States >> are British Columbia (the cities are extremely woke even if the regions >> are conservative), Ontario (their brand of conservatism resembles the >> centre-left at best) and Quebec (there is no appeasing the French >> Canadians). The others would probably benefit from being a part of the >> United States. > > Yeah, I guess British Columbia is just continuation of the Left Coast, Los > Angeles, San Francisco, Portland and Seattle. Some beautiful country in > British Columbia, however (also in Washington, Oregon and California). It's too bad that such beautiful land has to be ruined by progressives. I fully believe that the people living in the regions outsides of big cities are productive members of society. However, the cities themselves attract lots of progressives who believe that being a barista is a career. These people settle in large number inside of those cities and their vote tends to neutralize that of hard-working suburbanites. The result is that taxes increase as does crime, and life in general becomes much worse for everyone. Californians see this in their high taxes, dangerous, excrement-covered cities. The people of Oregon see the same thing. Obviously, the people in British Columbia are feeling it too. Progressives should be forced to live in places like the Northwest Territories where they are free to show us how progressive politics can turn a barren wasteland into a utopia. They should be barred from settling in places that are already beautiful since they do nothing more than destroy them. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-17 07:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnvtfj2r.ff5u.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home> |
| In reply to | #687537 |
On 2025-03-16, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > On 2025-03-16 1:38 a.m., RonB wrote: >> On 2025-03-15, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>> On 2025-03-15 2:34 a.m., RonB wrote: >>>> On 2025-03-14, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>> On 3/14/25 13:10, RonB wrote: >>>>>> On 2025-03-14, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2025-03-13, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 3/13/25 01:56, RonB wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-11, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 3/11/25 12:47, Dr No wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 10/03/2025 19:17, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://lunduke.substack.com/p/microsoft-still-promoting-and-funding> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mandatory corporate insurance for "Gender Affirming Care" for children >>>>>>>>>>>> as young as 3 years old. Microsoft employees encouraged to administer >>>>>>>>>>>> puberty blockers quickly. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You can now send your children and get free sex change all paid for by >>>>>>>>>>> Microsoft. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Now go and fuck off, you Canadian bastard. 51st American state will get >>>>>>>>>>> a new governor by the name of Mark Carney who is not a politician, let >>>>>>>>>>> alone not an elected MP. How daft Canadians can be!! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I agree with that last part. The way the Liberals have mocked democratic >>>>>>>>>> values over the past decades is alarming. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It will be nice that Tradeua will be gone. (And Canada can quit being the >>>>>>>>> butt of the joke whenever their leader comes up). But Carney looks to be an >>>>>>>>> Epstein client. So, just another member of the Rothschild cabal replacing a >>>>>>>>> member of the Rosthschild cabal. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yep. In fact, Trudeau hand-picked Carney to be his successor and it >>>>>>>> looks like the leader vote a week ago was as fraudulent as the 2020 >>>>>>>> American election. 200,000 votes were disqualified and nobody from "The >>>>>>>> Party" can tell anyone why. Just trust them when they tell you that >>>>>>>> Carney got 85% or more of the vote. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sorry to hear that. In Romania the leading candidate can't even run. This >>>>>>> is called "democracy." >>>>>> >>>>>> On Carney from a Telegram Channel... >>>>>> >>>>>> Mark Carney: Trudeau’s Successor & Keeper of the Woke Purse Strings? >>>>>> >>>>>> Mark Carney’s biggest challenge won’t be fixing Canada’s crumbling >>>>>> economy, securing its borders, or even figuring out how to navigate U.S. >>>>>> tariffs under Trump 2.0. Nope. His real mission? Carrying the torch for >>>>>> Trudeau’s woke crusade, where “gender equality” isn’t about equal >>>>>> opportunity but rather a blank check for social engineering on a global >>>>>> scale—to the tune of $11 billion. >>>>>> >>>>>> 🔹 Trudeau’s Gender Agenda: Over the past decade, Canada burned through >>>>>> billions funding “overseas gender initiatives,” lining the pockets of >>>>>> international NGOs while Canadians faced soaring inflation, housing >>>>>> crises, and skyrocketing debt. >>>>>> >>>>>> 🔹 Carney’s Next Move? Will he double down on Trudeau’s obsession with >>>>>> “gender empowerment” abroad, or will he dare to reverse course and put >>>>>> Canadian taxpayers before woke vanity projects? >>>>>> >>>>>> 🔹 Follow the Money: The Liberals aren’t just about “gender equity.” >>>>>> They’re about ideological capture. Their “progressive” policies always >>>>>> seem to end up as grants for well-connected activists, think tanks, and >>>>>> UN-backed slush funds—while working-class Canadians struggle to make ends >>>>>> meet. >>>>>> >>>>>> Carney was hand-picked for a reason. Not to fix Trudeau’s wreckage, but >>>>>> to keep the same neoliberal-globalist agenda alive. >>>>>> >>>>>> The woke mind virus has already cost Canada dearly. Will Carney be the >>>>>> one to finally pull the plug, or will he just keep feeding the beast? >>>>>> >>>>>> 🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews >>>>>> >>>>>> Again, sorry. The Canadians need to clear out these Woke morons completely — >>>>>> probably would if they could have fair elections. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> At this point, I would actually love for Trump to go ahead with the >>>>> threat and take the country over. I have no faith whatsoever in our >>>>> people's ability to elect competent representatives. >>>> >>>> When I lived in Montana in the 70s, there was a movement for Western Canada >>>> to break away from Eastern Canada. Too bad they didn't do it. >>> >>> The movement still exists, and I would bet that if Trump made a decent >>> offer to Alberta for it to become a state, they would at least vote on >>> it. Alberta generally gets no benefit from being within Canada, mostly >>> because of how resistant Quebec ecologists are to Alberta's main export: >>> oil. America wouldn't prevent the province from enriching itself. >> >> I'm guessing Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba (maybe?). One of my favorite >> TV shows is Corner Gas, so Saskatchewan has to be included. I actually >> worked in Saskatchewan putting up grain elevators when I was a kid (late >> teens). Apparently they couldn't get any Canadians to work, they all got 40 >> hours of minimum wage on welfare (that's what we were told anyhow). (This >> was in the early 70s.) > > This is why I don't believe the welfare system should even exist. If you > want to survive, work. If you don't want to, you are free to become a > burden to your family for as long as they can tolerate your parasitic > behaviour. The welfare system does little more than make able-bodied > people lazy and attract third-world parasites. > >>> Provinces Trump would definitely not want as part of the United States >>> are British Columbia (the cities are extremely woke even if the regions >>> are conservative), Ontario (their brand of conservatism resembles the >>> centre-left at best) and Quebec (there is no appeasing the French >>> Canadians). The others would probably benefit from being a part of the >>> United States. >> >> Yeah, I guess British Columbia is just continuation of the Left Coast, Los >> Angeles, San Francisco, Portland and Seattle. Some beautiful country in >> British Columbia, however (also in Washington, Oregon and California). > > It's too bad that such beautiful land has to be ruined by progressives. > I fully believe that the people living in the regions outsides of big > cities are productive members of society. However, the cities themselves > attract lots of progressives who believe that being a barista is a > career. These people settle in large number inside of those cities and > their vote tends to neutralize that of hard-working suburbanites. The > result is that taxes increase as does crime, and life in general becomes > much worse for everyone. Californians see this in their high taxes, > dangerous, excrement-covered cities. The people of Oregon see the same > thing. Obviously, the people in British Columbia are feeling it too. > > Progressives should be forced to live in places like the Northwest > Territories where they are free to show us how progressive politics can > turn a barren wasteland into a utopia. They should be barred from > settling in places that are already beautiful since they do nothing more > than destroy them. There's some empty, alkaline desert land in Nevada just waiting for the Woke. They should be happy there. There's not much they can do to ruin the enverionment — it's pretty much already ruined. -- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-17 08:46 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <cQUBP.118099$8rz3.91614@fx37.iad> |
| In reply to | #687580 |
On 3/17/25 03:16, RonB wrote: > On 2025-03-16, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >> On 2025-03-16 1:38 a.m., RonB wrote: >>> On 2025-03-15, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>> On 2025-03-15 2:34 a.m., RonB wrote: >>>>> On 2025-03-14, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>> On 3/14/25 13:10, RonB wrote: >>>>>>> On 2025-03-14, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2025-03-13, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 3/13/25 01:56, RonB wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-11, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 3/11/25 12:47, Dr No wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/03/2025 19:17, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://lunduke.substack.com/p/microsoft-still-promoting-and-funding> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mandatory corporate insurance for "Gender Affirming Care" for children >>>>>>>>>>>>> as young as 3 years old. Microsoft employees encouraged to administer >>>>>>>>>>>>> puberty blockers quickly. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You can now send your children and get free sex change all paid for by >>>>>>>>>>>> Microsoft. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Now go and fuck off, you Canadian bastard. 51st American state will get >>>>>>>>>>>> a new governor by the name of Mark Carney who is not a politician, let >>>>>>>>>>>> alone not an elected MP. How daft Canadians can be!! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I agree with that last part. The way the Liberals have mocked democratic >>>>>>>>>>> values over the past decades is alarming. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It will be nice that Tradeua will be gone. (And Canada can quit being the >>>>>>>>>> butt of the joke whenever their leader comes up). But Carney looks to be an >>>>>>>>>> Epstein client. So, just another member of the Rothschild cabal replacing a >>>>>>>>>> member of the Rosthschild cabal. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yep. In fact, Trudeau hand-picked Carney to be his successor and it >>>>>>>>> looks like the leader vote a week ago was as fraudulent as the 2020 >>>>>>>>> American election. 200,000 votes were disqualified and nobody from "The >>>>>>>>> Party" can tell anyone why. Just trust them when they tell you that >>>>>>>>> Carney got 85% or more of the vote. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sorry to hear that. In Romania the leading candidate can't even run. This >>>>>>>> is called "democracy." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Carney from a Telegram Channel... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Mark Carney: Trudeau’s Successor & Keeper of the Woke Purse Strings? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Mark Carney’s biggest challenge won’t be fixing Canada’s crumbling >>>>>>> economy, securing its borders, or even figuring out how to navigate U.S. >>>>>>> tariffs under Trump 2.0. Nope. His real mission? Carrying the torch for >>>>>>> Trudeau’s woke crusade, where “gender equality” isn’t about equal >>>>>>> opportunity but rather a blank check for social engineering on a global >>>>>>> scale—to the tune of $11 billion. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 🔹 Trudeau’s Gender Agenda: Over the past decade, Canada burned through >>>>>>> billions funding “overseas gender initiatives,” lining the pockets of >>>>>>> international NGOs while Canadians faced soaring inflation, housing >>>>>>> crises, and skyrocketing debt. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 🔹 Carney’s Next Move? Will he double down on Trudeau’s obsession with >>>>>>> “gender empowerment” abroad, or will he dare to reverse course and put >>>>>>> Canadian taxpayers before woke vanity projects? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 🔹 Follow the Money: The Liberals aren’t just about “gender equity.” >>>>>>> They’re about ideological capture. Their “progressive” policies always >>>>>>> seem to end up as grants for well-connected activists, think tanks, and >>>>>>> UN-backed slush funds—while working-class Canadians struggle to make ends >>>>>>> meet. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Carney was hand-picked for a reason. Not to fix Trudeau’s wreckage, but >>>>>>> to keep the same neoliberal-globalist agenda alive. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The woke mind virus has already cost Canada dearly. Will Carney be the >>>>>>> one to finally pull the plug, or will he just keep feeding the beast? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Again, sorry. The Canadians need to clear out these Woke morons completely — >>>>>>> probably would if they could have fair elections. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> At this point, I would actually love for Trump to go ahead with the >>>>>> threat and take the country over. I have no faith whatsoever in our >>>>>> people's ability to elect competent representatives. >>>>> >>>>> When I lived in Montana in the 70s, there was a movement for Western Canada >>>>> to break away from Eastern Canada. Too bad they didn't do it. >>>> >>>> The movement still exists, and I would bet that if Trump made a decent >>>> offer to Alberta for it to become a state, they would at least vote on >>>> it. Alberta generally gets no benefit from being within Canada, mostly >>>> because of how resistant Quebec ecologists are to Alberta's main export: >>>> oil. America wouldn't prevent the province from enriching itself. >>> >>> I'm guessing Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba (maybe?). One of my favorite >>> TV shows is Corner Gas, so Saskatchewan has to be included. I actually >>> worked in Saskatchewan putting up grain elevators when I was a kid (late >>> teens). Apparently they couldn't get any Canadians to work, they all got 40 >>> hours of minimum wage on welfare (that's what we were told anyhow). (This >>> was in the early 70s.) >> >> This is why I don't believe the welfare system should even exist. If you >> want to survive, work. If you don't want to, you are free to become a >> burden to your family for as long as they can tolerate your parasitic >> behaviour. The welfare system does little more than make able-bodied >> people lazy and attract third-world parasites. >> >>>> Provinces Trump would definitely not want as part of the United States >>>> are British Columbia (the cities are extremely woke even if the regions >>>> are conservative), Ontario (their brand of conservatism resembles the >>>> centre-left at best) and Quebec (there is no appeasing the French >>>> Canadians). The others would probably benefit from being a part of the >>>> United States. >>> >>> Yeah, I guess British Columbia is just continuation of the Left Coast, Los >>> Angeles, San Francisco, Portland and Seattle. Some beautiful country in >>> British Columbia, however (also in Washington, Oregon and California). >> >> It's too bad that such beautiful land has to be ruined by progressives. >> I fully believe that the people living in the regions outsides of big >> cities are productive members of society. However, the cities themselves >> attract lots of progressives who believe that being a barista is a >> career. These people settle in large number inside of those cities and >> their vote tends to neutralize that of hard-working suburbanites. The >> result is that taxes increase as does crime, and life in general becomes >> much worse for everyone. Californians see this in their high taxes, >> dangerous, excrement-covered cities. The people of Oregon see the same >> thing. Obviously, the people in British Columbia are feeling it too. >> >> Progressives should be forced to live in places like the Northwest >> Territories where they are free to show us how progressive politics can >> turn a barren wasteland into a utopia. They should be barred from >> settling in places that are already beautiful since they do nothing more >> than destroy them. > > There's some empty, alkaline desert land in Nevada just waiting for the > Woke. They should be happy there. There's not much they can do to ruin the > enverionment — it's pretty much already ruined. That's exactly it. Instead of changing something that's already been built to fit their idiocy, they can build something anew where there is nothing. Every millimetre of land there will be settled by people who adhere to the Church of Woke, and they will show us just how brilliant they all are. Doing otherwise will simply prove what we already know: that conservatives, mostly white, build whereas progressives destroy. Even Malcolm X believed that a white person identifying as a liberal was the most dangerous force. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-17 20:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m3rfj7Fn89eU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #687580 |
On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 07:16:30 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote: > There's some empty, alkaline desert land in Nevada just waiting for the > Woke. They should be happy there. There's not much they can do to ruin > the enverionment — it's pretty much already ruined. I've got just the place! https://www.protectthackerpass.org/ They better be careful though. If you start drawing Venn diagrams radical environmentalism and woke don't completely overlap. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Green_Resistance#Anti-trans_views
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-12 00:45 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <fb42tjpakvmoa63d128uop0a0e28hm5nfl@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #687302 |
In alt.comp.os.windows-11, on Mon, 10 Mar 2025 15:17:38 -0400, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: ><https://lunduke.substack.com/p/microsoft-still-promoting-and-funding> > >Mandatory corporate insurance for "Gender Affirming Care" for children >as young as 3 years old. Microsoft employees encouraged to administer >puberty blockers quickly. That's nothing. Android has an app that will do that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | focoloco@proton.me |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-24 08:03 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <kgp2ujtne06m6kt8lj85qhli4ei2e47hec@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #687302 |
On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 15:17:38 -0400, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: ><https://lunduke.substack.com/p/microsoft-still-promoting-and-funding> > >Mandatory corporate insurance for "Gender Affirming Care" for children >as young as 3 years old. Microsoft employees encouraged to administer >puberty blockers quickly. Thanks for the report from Dimwit Dynasty.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web