Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #687077 > unrolled thread

Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-04 22:22 -0600
    Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-03-05 06:04 +0000
      Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) - 2025-03-10 03:05 +0000
    Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-04 23:45 -0800
      Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-05 06:09 -0500
        Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-05 11:11 -0800
          Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-05 15:39 -0500
            Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-05 13:36 -0800
              Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-05 17:35 -0500
                Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-03-06 04:57 +0000
                  Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-06 09:06 -0500
          Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-05 15:18 -0800
        Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-05 13:54 -0600
          Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-05 16:01 -0500
    Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 14:30 -0500
      Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 13:43 -0500
        Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-03-11 19:32 +0000
          Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-03-11 12:58 -0700
          Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 16:27 -0500
        Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-12 14:42 -0500
          Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-12 12:45 -0700
            Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-12 15:35 -0500
              Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-12 13:37 -0700
            Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-03-12 13:57 -0700
              Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-12 16:58 -0500
                Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-12 16:00 -0700
                  Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-03-12 16:51 -0700
                    Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-12 21:47 -0500
                    Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-12 21:55 -0500
          Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 14:52 -0500
            Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 13:22 -0700
            Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 15:53 -0500
      Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-15 18:17 -0500
        Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) - 2025-03-16 00:10 +0000
          Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-15 19:49 -0500
            Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-16 02:53 +0000
              Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-16 00:09 -0500
                Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-16 21:59 +0000
                  Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-16 17:50 -0500
                    Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-16 22:54 +0000

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#687077 — Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)

Poor "Jim Pennino".. If he was alive he'd be holding his dick 
(originally Arindam's dick) in his hand for the entire 100 minutes of 
Trump talk...


Trump didn't dare mentioning Iran. Do you know why? It would ruin all 
credibility he tried to build in stuff he talked about tonight.

Sometimes you cannot bullshit about Iran no matter who and where you are.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#687079

On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 4:22:16 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:

>
>
> Poor "Jim Pennino".. If he was alive he'd be holding his dick
> (originally Arindam's dick) in his hand for the entire 100 minutes of
> Trump talk...

Not possible, Roachie. Arindam's balls (too big for any cannon barrel)
are on proud display in the Kremlin. Just imagine how heavy the
corresponding organ will be. A thousandth of that would crush that puny
penisnino.
>
>
> Trump didn't dare mentioning Iran. Do you know why? It would ruin all
> credibility he tried to build in stuff he talked about tonight.
>
> Sometimes you cannot bullshit about Iran no matter who and where you
> are.

Nothing great after Nader Shah, eh, Roachie?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687258

On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 6:04:06 +0000, Bertietaylor wrote:

> On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 4:22:16 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Poor "Jim Pennino".. If he was alive he'd be holding his dick
>> (originally Arindam's dick) in his hand for the entire 100 minutes of
>> Trump talk...
>
> Not possible, Roachie. Arindam's balls (too big for any cannon barrel)
> are on proud display in the Kremlin. Just imagine how heavy the
> corresponding organ will be. A thousandth of that would crush that puny
> penisnino.
>>
>>
>> Trump didn't dare mentioning Iran. Do you know why? It would ruin all
>> credibility he tried to build in stuff he talked about tonight.
>>
>> Sometimes you cannot bullshit about Iran no matter who and where you
>> are.
>
> Nothing great after Nader Shah, eh, Roachie?

Quiet now, the supercilious roach Roachie.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687086

Physfitfreak wrote:
> 
> Poor "Jim Pennino".. If he was alive he'd be holding his dick
> (originally Arindam's dick) in his hand for the entire 100 minutes of
> Trump talk...
> 
> Trump didn't dare mentioning Iran. Do you know why? It would ruin all
> credibility he tried to build in stuff he talked about tonight.
> 
> Sometimes you cannot bullshit about Iran no matter who and where you are.


Iran is what they call...the final solution to the Israeli problem.


Let Iran do what the world has been trying to do since the beginning of
time...



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687087

The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)


You ever consider buying a new computer?

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687088

Joel wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
> >X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
> 
> You ever consider buying a new computer?


https://www.google.com/search?q=military+still+uses+windows+xp&oq=military+still+using&aqs


(it is a secret that Microsoft still gives xp win updates to the
military...)



Mozilla 4.00 Gold doesn't work well for me...

i'll stick to 3.04


What is WinNT????



Would you like to upgrade the military's computers to win 11???? 


you would be arrested for ...sabotage.


treason.


death by hanging!


fuckem shoot him...






> 
> --
> Joel W. Crump
> 
> Amendment XIV
> Section 1.
> 
> [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
> abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
> United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
> life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
> nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
> protection of the laws.
> 
> Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
> liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687091

The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>> >X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
>> 
>> You ever consider buying a new computer?
>
>https://www.google.com/search?q=military+still+uses+windows+xp&oq=military+still+using&aqs
>
>
>(it is a secret that Microsoft still gives xp win updates to the
>military...)
>
>
>
>Mozilla 4.00 Gold doesn't work well for me...
>
>i'll stick to 3.04
>
>
>What is WinNT????


It sounds like you are at least using XP, which is OK, sort of.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687093

Joel wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
> >> >X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
> >>
> >> You ever consider buying a new computer?
> >
> >https://www.google.com/search?q=military+still+uses+windows+xp&oq=military+still+using&aqs
> >
> >
> >(it is a secret that Microsoft still gives xp win updates to the
> >military...)
> >
> >
> >
> >Mozilla 4.00 Gold doesn't work well for me...
> >
> >i'll stick to 3.04
> >
> >
> >What is WinNT????
> 
> It sounds like you are at least using XP, which is OK, sort of.
> 
> --
> Joel W. Crump


It is good enough for the military... J.R. Crumb




-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687094

The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>> >> >X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
>> >>
>> >> You ever consider buying a new computer?
>> >
>> >https://www.google.com/search?q=military+still+uses+windows+xp&oq=military+still+using&aqs
>> >
>> >
>> >(it is a secret that Microsoft still gives xp win updates to the
>> >military...)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >Mozilla 4.00 Gold doesn't work well for me...
>> >
>> >i'll stick to 3.04
>> >
>> >
>> >What is WinNT????
>> 
>> It sounds like you are at least using XP, which is OK, sort of.
>
>It is good enough for the military... J.R. Crumb


I am more of the cutting-edge user.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687100

On Wed, 05 Mar 2025 17:35:58 -0500, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
<8bkhsjti8hfotd8v1hq5e803ff4jrjk7gb@4ax.com>:

> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
>>> >> >X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
>>> >>
>>> >> You ever consider buying a new computer?
>>> >
>>> >https://www.google.com/search?
q=military+still+uses+windows+xp&oq=military+still+using&aqs
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >(it is a secret that Microsoft still gives xp win updates to the
>>> >military...)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >Mozilla 4.00 Gold doesn't work well for me...
>>> >
>>> >i'll stick to 3.04
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >What is WinNT????
>>> 
>>> It sounds like you are at least using XP, which is OK, sort of.
>>
>>It is good enough for the military... J.R. Crumb
> 
> 
> I am more of the cutting-edge user.

Oh?  What kernel are you running?

-- 
-v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
   OS: Linux 6.14.0-rc5 Release: Mint 22.1 Mem: 258G
   "Despite the high cost of living, it remains popular."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687109

vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:

>> I am more of the cutting-edge user.
>
>Oh?  What kernel are you running?


The one supported by my distro.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687095

On 3/5/2025 11:11 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Joel wrote:
>>
>> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>
>>> X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
>>
>> You ever consider buying a new computer?
> 
> 
> https://www.google.com/search?q=military+still+uses+windows+xp&oq=military+still+using&aqs
> 
> 
> (it is a secret that Microsoft still gives xp win updates to the
> military...)
> 
> 
> 
> Mozilla 4.00 Gold doesn't work well for me...
> 
> i'll stick to 3.04
> 
> 
> What is WinNT????[...]

Basically a workstation and server version of Windows. Last time I used 
it was WinNT 4.0.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687090

On 3/5/25 5:09 AM, Joel wrote:
> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
>> X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
> 
> 
> You ever consider buying a new computer?
> 


When it's a matter of getting all the juice of everything out, Star has 
no equal :)

He isn't yet done with 1940s comics!... I like that a lot.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687092

Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote:

>>> X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
>> 
>> You ever consider buying a new computer?
>
>When it's a matter of getting all the juice of everything out, Star has 
>no equal :)
>
>He isn't yet done with 1940s comics!... I like that a lot.


It made me think even Linux was too bulky for their PC.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687229

On 3/4/25 10:22 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
> 
> 
> Poor "Jim Pennino".. If he was alive he'd be holding his dick 
> (originally Arindam's dick) in his hand for the entire 100 minutes of 
> Trump talk...
> 
> 
> Trump didn't dare mentioning Iran. Do you know why? It would ruin all 
> credibility he tried to build in stuff he talked about tonight.
> 
> Sometimes you cannot bullshit about Iran no matter who and where you are.
> 



So he kept the "bullshit" for later. He's busy bullshitting it now, 
thinking dealing with Iran is a poker game.

Oh he'll wake up and smell the coffee. Then he shuts up about Iran till 
the end of his term. His team makes sure Sheep's attention go elsewhere.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687334

On 3/9/25 2:30 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
> On 3/4/25 10:22 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>>
>>
>> Poor "Jim Pennino".. If he was alive he'd be holding his dick 
>> (originally Arindam's dick) in his hand for the entire 100 minutes of 
>> Trump talk...
>>
>>
>> Trump didn't dare mentioning Iran. Do you know why? It would ruin all 
>> credibility he tried to build in stuff he talked about tonight.
>>
>> Sometimes you cannot bullshit about Iran no matter who and where you are.
>>
> 
> 
> 
> So he kept the "bullshit" for later. He's busy bullshitting it now, 
> thinking dealing with Iran is a poker game.
> 
> Oh he'll wake up and smell the coffee. Then he shuts up about Iran till 
> the end of his term. His team makes sure Sheep's attention go elsewhere.
> 
> 
> 
> 


Pezeshkian, today addressing Trump, said, "I won't negotiate with you. 
Do whatever the hell that you want."

Hehe :)

This is Iranians' voice "friendly" to USA! People who want to have 
"brotherly" relations with the Americans. Do you smell some coffee out 
there in White House? ..

Trump thinks Iranians are Russians. Trump thinks Iranians are Chinese. 
Trump thinks Iranians are Bitches of Americans. Hehe :)

He's not used to deal with people who aren't Bitches of Americans.

Be rude and Iranians fucking discard your ass. Now bye bye till the end 
of your term :)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687335

On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 13:43:38 -0500, Physfitfreak wrote:

>>>
>>> Poor "Jim Pennino".. If he was alive 
>>>

Is it true?  Is jimp no longer with us?

When I was a frequenter of sci.physics I had many a fruitful
discussion and also many an argument with jimp.  He was a very
knowledgeable and passionate practitioner of physics and of
science in general.

If true then I am very saddened by his passing. 



-- 
Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687336

In sci.physics Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 13:43:38 -0500, Physfitfreak wrote:
> 
>>>>
>>>> Poor "Jim Pennino".. If he was alive 
>>>>
> 
> Is it true?  Is jimp no longer with us?
> 
> When I was a frequenter of sci.physics I had many a fruitful
> discussion and also many an argument with jimp.  He was a very
> knowledgeable and passionate practitioner of physics and of
> science in general.
> 
> If true then I am very saddened by his passing. 

Thanks for that, but like most everything this poster boy for the
Dunning-Kruger effect posts, it is not true.

Likely he doesn't understand that his posts are such a waste of time
that I plonked him over a year ago and haven't seen a word he has posted
since then other than some snippets in his kook fight with the poster
boy for multiple personality disorder and barking mad crackpot
Arindam/Bertie.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687342

On 3/11/25 2:32 PM, Farley Flud wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 13:43:38 -0500, Physfitfreak wrote:
> 
>>>>
>>>> Poor "Jim Pennino".. If he was alive
>>>>
> 
> Is it true?  Is jimp no longer with us?
> 
> When I was a frequenter of sci.physics I had many a fruitful
> discussion and also many an argument with jimp.  He was a very
> knowledgeable and passionate practitioner of physics and of
> science in general.
> 
> If true then I am very saddened by his passing.
> 
> 
> 


As I said before, I must've kill filed you in physics forum early on, 
cause I don't remember one post from you here.

"Jim Pennino" died in 2020. He never uttered a word of physics worth 
reading for me.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687359

On 3/11/25 1:43 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
> On 3/9/25 2:30 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>> On 3/4/25 10:22 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Poor "Jim Pennino".. If he was alive he'd be holding his dick 
>>> (originally Arindam's dick) in his hand for the entire 100 minutes of 
>>> Trump talk...
>>>
>>>
>>> Trump didn't dare mentioning Iran. Do you know why? It would ruin all 
>>> credibility he tried to build in stuff he talked about tonight.
>>>
>>> Sometimes you cannot bullshit about Iran no matter who and where you 
>>> are.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> So he kept the "bullshit" for later. He's busy bullshitting it now, 
>> thinking dealing with Iran is a poker game.
>>
>> Oh he'll wake up and smell the coffee. Then he shuts up about Iran 
>> till the end of his term. His team makes sure Sheep's attention go 
>> elsewhere.
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> Pezeshkian, today addressing Trump, said, "I won't negotiate with you. 
> Do whatever the hell that you want."
> 
> Hehe :)
> 
> This is Iranians' voice "friendly" to USA! People who want to have 
> "brotherly" relations with the Americans. Do you smell some coffee out 
> there in White House? ..
> 
> Trump thinks Iranians are Russians. Trump thinks Iranians are Chinese. 
> Trump thinks Iranians are Bitches of Americans. Hehe :)
> 
> He's not used to deal with people who aren't Bitches of Americans.
> 
> Be rude and Iranians fucking discard your ass. Now bye bye till the end 
> of your term :)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



Trump's so-called "letter" addressed to Iran's leader was at last handed 
to Iran's foreign minister by some Arab Bitches of Americans today.

The contents aren't published yet. But the answer to it was quick. And 
Trump is incapable of turning time go back to May 8, 2018, so he can 
this time know what he's doing.

USA will not be part of the nuclear negotiations. Neither is Europe. 
Iran has arranged negotiations with Russia and China only.

The three countries conducted war practices inside Persian Gulf in the 
past week in the anticipation of possible attack from USA on Iranian 
nuclear facilities. Anything happens there, will happen to all Arab 
nations south of Persian Gulf with American bases in them, also. 
Certainly including Saudis and especially the Emarate.

If Israel acts alone, it will be seen as American action against Iran.

So brace for some very interesting times :)

I'm looking forward to it because this matter should get into using 
H-bombs. Many, many of them. And that means Israelis paying dearly for 
their high crimes against humanity and literally all the American 
military bases in the region turning into very hot dust. This must 
happen. Iran knows it must happen. That's why Iran as lately as last 
week disagreed with Arab nations' proposal for a two-state solution in 
Israel. For Iran it is not a solution.

The solution, is tied with what must be done with the USA.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web